HomeMy WebLinkAboutFin Budget Proposed FY2012-13CITY OF,r'��Z
Agenda Item No: 5 a.
Meeting Date: June 18, 2012
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: Finance
Prepared by: Mark Moses,
Interim Finance Director
City Manager Approval) iw"4
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED CITY BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR
2012-2013
RECOMMENDATION: Accept report.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to provide the City Council and community with
the proposed city-wide budget for fiscal year 2012-2013.
The City Council conducted budget workshops on April 2, April 16, and May 14, 2012. The
purpose of these workshops was to review the City's three-year forecast, and to discuss program
priorities and key fiscal policies that should shape the development of the fiscal year 2012-2013
budget. One significant outcome is that staff was directed to prepare the preliminary general fund
budget without resorting to the use of reserves or borrowed funds to balance the budget. A
number of potential programs that could be reduced or eliminated to preserve resources were
also discussed.
At the City Council meeting of June 4, 2012, staff presented a preliminary general fund budget
with a $1,062,000 deficit, and provided recommended solutions totaling $1,095,000. Following
discussion by and direction from City Council, a $327,000 deficit remained. Staff was directed to
return with a proposed balanced budget that would preserve the street crimes unit in the Police
Department.
This report will focus on the following key areas.
1. Proposed, balanced budget for General Fund.
2. Proposed budgets for other City Funds.
3. Next steps for adoption of fiscal year 2012-2013 budget.
File No.: 1 -
Council Meeting: %t�d
Disposition:
FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT l Paze: 2
ANALYSIS:
GENERAL FUND
Of the $1,095,000 in proposed budget -balancing solutions that were presented at the June 4,
2012 City Council meeting, $735,000 were accepted; this direction reduced the deficit from
$1,062,000 to $327,000. Since that time, staff identified the following two sources that, when
taken together, successfully resolve the shortfall.
1. Since the preparation of the June 4, 2012 preliminary budget staff report, staff received
additional information regarding revenue from fines and permit fees that will increase
fiscal year 2012-2013 projections by $250,000.
2. After reviewing the likely gap between the police officer retirements and the start date of
new hires to backfill these positions, there will be vacancy savings in the Police
Department of approximately $90,000.
These adjustments have a combined $340,000 impact on the general fund operating budget.
When combined with the adjustments previously approved, the proposed budget has positive
operating results of $13,000.
Key budget assumptions for fiscal year 2012-2013:
Although, in fiscal year 2012-2013, general fund revenues are projected to grow by $1.5 million,
or 2.7%, expenditures have been reduced by $750K ($660K on June 4 and $90K on June 18)
from the preliminary budget, in order to balance the budget without the use of borrowed funds or
reserves.
Revenue Factors
Sales tax and the transactions and use tax (Measure "S") account for 75% of the $1.5 million
increase in revenues over the previous fiscal year (from $54.5 million to $56.0 million). Sales tax
is projected to increase by approximately $840,000, or 5%, from $1613 million to $16.97
million. Transactions and use tax is projected to increase by approximately $250,000, or 4%.
from $6.20 million to $6.45 million. All other revenues, including business tax, franchise tax,
charges for services and permit fees are expected to be flat or experience very modest increases.
One exception is property tax, which is expected to decrease by approximately 0.5%, or $69,000.
Preliminary
FY 2012-2013
Budget
Balancing
June 4
Budget
Balancing
June 18
Proposed
Budget
Revenues
55,611,000
75,000
$250,000
55,936,000
Transfers in
1,378,000
0
0
1,378,000
Total Resources
$56,989,000
$75,000
$250,000
$57,314,000
Expenditures
56,532,000
(660,000)
(90,000)
55,782,000
Transfers out
1,519,000
0
0
1,519,000
Total Uses
$58,051,000
$660,000
($90,000)
$57,301,000
Net Operating
$1,062,000
$735,000
$340,000
$13,000
Key budget assumptions for fiscal year 2012-2013:
Although, in fiscal year 2012-2013, general fund revenues are projected to grow by $1.5 million,
or 2.7%, expenditures have been reduced by $750K ($660K on June 4 and $90K on June 18)
from the preliminary budget, in order to balance the budget without the use of borrowed funds or
reserves.
Revenue Factors
Sales tax and the transactions and use tax (Measure "S") account for 75% of the $1.5 million
increase in revenues over the previous fiscal year (from $54.5 million to $56.0 million). Sales tax
is projected to increase by approximately $840,000, or 5%, from $1613 million to $16.97
million. Transactions and use tax is projected to increase by approximately $250,000, or 4%.
from $6.20 million to $6.45 million. All other revenues, including business tax, franchise tax,
charges for services and permit fees are expected to be flat or experience very modest increases.
One exception is property tax, which is expected to decrease by approximately 0.5%, or $69,000.
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 3
Expenditure Factors
Increases in pension contributions and retiree medical funding account for the entire $1.5 million
increase in expenditures over the previous year (from $54.3 million to $55.8 million).
OTHER FUNDS
Successor Agency
Prior to the State Legislature -initiated dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency, City Council
met as the Redevelopment Agency, and approved its annual budget as part of the City-wide
budget process. Under the current legislation, the City, as Successor Agency, is not required to
prepare an annual budget. All funding of the Successor Agency follows a different process,
which is specified in the law. Funding must be approved by an Oversight Board and the
California Department of Finance for six month periods. Due to the Successor Agency's six
month fiscal horizon and the fact that its legal status is different from that of the former
Redevelopment Agency, a Successor Agency budget will not be submitted as part of the City-
wide annual budget. The former functions of the Redevelopment Agency have been transferred
to the City Managers office and the City Council approves the budget for that office.
The Oversight Board has approved the minimum allowable administrative expenses of $250,000
annually for staff time involved in the dissolution of the former Redevelopment Agency.
Therefore, $125,000 has been projected as available to the City for the first half of fiscal year
2012/13. The City as Successor Agency is scheduled to consider the budget for July 1, 2012 —
December 31, 2012 on June 18, 2012, under a separate report.
Capital Improvement Program
The Capital Improvement Program will be covered in a separate report from Public Works on the
City Council meeting of July 2nd. The new and carried -over appropriations for fiscal year 2012-
2013 are expected to equal approximately $4.4 million from special revenue, grants and other
funding sources. The chief challenges of this activity include (1) project management capacity on
active projects; (2) capital project funding shortages; (3) ensuring that grant -supported projects
have sufficient project management and matching funds to take full advantage of the grants.
Special Revenue and Grant Funds
These funds have restricted uses, based on their respective sources. Significant funds in this
group include Paramedic Tax, which as discussed at the May 7 City Council meeting, has a
balanced budget for the upcoming fiscal year. Measure C, the Library parcel tax, is included in
this group and is the subject of a separate study session on June 18. Other significant funds in
this category include Gas Tax, Sewer Maintenance, Storm Water, Recreation, and Business
Improvement District. These funds are balanced for fiscal year 2012-2013.
Enterprise Fund
The sole fund in this category is the Parking Services Fund. Although parking meter rates were
last increased in 2007, the fund has remained fairly stable operationally, primarily as a result of
reducing costs. The parking structures and lots have deferred maintenance issues that will need
to be addressed over the next few years, in order to preserve these revenue -generating assets.
Internal Service Funds and Capital Replacement Funds
These funds are used to manage services that are delivered throughout the organization. For
example, computer replacement, employee benefits, workers compensation, general liability and
vehicle replacement are funded via internal charges to the funds that utilize these respective
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 4
services. The internal service funds have sufficient resources to support services for fiscal year
2012-2013. The capital replacement funds (e.g., building maintenance and vehicle maintenance)
are significantly underfunded with respect to long-term needs.
CITY-WIDE FUND SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Q
General Fund $57,301,000
Special Revenue and Grant Funds 25,667,376
Enterprise Fund (Parking Services) 4,716,861
Internal Service & Capital Replacement 11,146,920
Misc. Capital Project Funds 568,581
Adjustment for ISF Charges & Transfers (13,096,825)
Total City-wide Appropriations $86,303,913
* Adjustment for charges and transfers included in other fund
appropriations
ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY
As discussed in the prior budget presentations; while the City has achieved significant progress
by balancing the general fund budget without the use of borrowed monies or reserves, the budget
continues to rely on unsustainable withholding of resources that need to be addressed over the
next two to five years:
1. Capital and maintenance budgets have been deferred for several years. This practice has
severely limited funding for facility maintenance, repairs and replacement. City -owned
buildings and city -operated public facilities, parks and open space risk severe reduction
in their respective values, safety and utility if they are not properly maintained. In
addition, grant funds are at risk, as a result of reductions in project management capacity.
2. The ongoing erosion of staffing levels has reduced the City's organizational capacity.
The proposed budget provides funding for total staffing of 377, down 68 positions, or
15% from fiscal year 2007-2008. Currently, there is very little capacity to proactively
manage emerging issues, or to ensure smooth and consistent continuity of services.
Similarly, although the reduced workweek from 37.5 to 36 hours for the non -safety
personnel has conserved general fund resources, it has come at a price, in the form of
exacerbating the service delivery and organizational capacity related -challenges caused
by the earlier staff reductions.
NEXT STEPS: Staff is preparing to return to Council at the meeting of July 2. 2012, with the
following items:
1. Fiscal Year 2012-2013 City-wide Budget Adoption
2. Capital Improvement Program
3. Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Adjustments
4. Measure "S" Transactions and Use Tax Committee Report
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 5
FISCAL IMPACT: The preliminary fiscal year 2012-2013 budgets are balanced for all funds.
The proposed General Fund budget does not use borrowed monies or reserves as resources with
which to fund expenditures.
RECOMMEDED ACTION: Direct staff to return on July 2, 2012 with a final citywide budget,
incorporating modifications or changes discussed at the City Council meeting of June 18.