HomeMy WebLinkAboutCD Greenwood Ave Lot DedicationC/TYOF Agenda Item No: 5.b
n4 Meeting Date: October 3, 2016
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: Community Development, Community Services
Prepared by: Paul Jensen, Carlene McCart City Manager Approval:
TOPIC: Greenwood Avenue Lots — Offer of Dedication
SUBJECT: Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Rafael Accepting the Offer of
Dedication from Marin Open Space Trust (MOST) of Two Vacant Lots at the End of Greenwood
Avenue, APNs 012-320-01 and -10, to the City in Fee for Permanent Open Space; Authorizing the
City Manager to Execute, on Behalf of the City, all Documents Required to Effectuate Such
Conveyance; and Directing Staff to Initiate Corresponding Amendments to the City's General
Plan and Zoning Ordinance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Marin Open Space Trust proposes to dedicate two parcels of vacant
residential land comprising three (3) acres, in fee to the City of San Rafael for use as permanent public
open space. The land connects the existing thirty-three (33) acres of City -held Oakwood Open Space
to the terminus of Greenwood Avenue in the Gerstle Park Neighborhood.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Resolution
BACKGROUND:
Propertv Description and History
The subject property consists of two residential lots of record (Oakwood Subdivision Unit 2, Lots 21 and
22) located at the terminus of Greenwood Avenue. Greenwood Avenue is located in the southwest
corner of the Gerstle Park neighborhood. The lots are vacant and heavily vegetated. A graded trail/fire
road traverses the two lots, commencing at Greenwood Avenue and continuing upslope into City -
owned open space (Oakwood Open Space). Each lot is approximately 1.5 acres in size and the
parcels include the following:
• A public utility easement is recorded on the lower Lot 21 along the graded trail/fire road that
contains both storm water and sewer/wastewater improvements.
• A private sewer easement and sewer line recorded on Lot 22.
• Each lot contains a portion of the historic Makin Grade trail, which was the San Rafael-Bolinas
stage -coach route leading to Downtown San Rafael.
FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
File No.: 2-1-67
Council Meeting: 10/03/2016
Disposition: Resolution 14211
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 2
The lots are located in the R1a-H (Single -Family Residential/Hillside Overlay) zoning district, which
requires a minimum lot size of one acre. The San Rafael General Plan 2020 land use map designates
the lots as Hillside Residential (0.5-2.0 dwelling units per acre). The lots are bordered by developed
residential lots to the north and east and undeveloped land to the west and south.
The two lots are part of the Oakwood Subdivision, which was recorded in the mid -1980. The Oakwood
Subdivision contains 45 residential lots and 30+ acres of preserved open space. All but the two subject
lots in this subdivision are developed with single-family homes. Over the years, there have been
several planning applications filed for the development of the two lots; however, no permits have ever
been approved for development.
The two lots are immediately contiguous to the preserved Oakwood Open Space. The open space was
dedicated to and accepted by the City as part of the Oakwood Subdivision approval and recordation
process. The land dedication and acceptance by the City was done at a time when dedication in fee
title of such offers was common and preferred.
Attachment 1 provides various maps of the subject lots, as well as the Oakwood Subdivision.
Proposal:
The Marin Open Space Trust (MOST) has been contacted by two private parties to assist them in the
acquisition of the two vacant lots. Following purchase of the property, MOST desires to transfer
ownership of the lots to the City of San Rafael so that the lots can be preserved as permanent public
open space, serving as an extension to the 33 -acre Oakwood Open Space. The transfer, which
involves a three -party closing of escrow, is offered free of acquisition costs to the City. The offer of
proposed dedication is summarized in the attached letter from MOST to the City of San Rafael, dated
July 20, 2016 (Attachment 2). The letter is supported by additional history, background information and
objectives for the offer.
Public Hearings:
The City Council held a hearing to receive information on the proposal at the regular meeting on
September 6, 2016. Eleven speakers, representing residents, MOST, the Gerstle Park Neighborhood
Association, and San Rafael Heritage, spoke in support of the proposal. Correspondence was received
from six parties in support of the proposal. A petition supporting the proposal and signed by over 100
members of the public was also submitted.
The City Council gave direction to staff for further actions and a report back to the Council on the
following issues:
• Review a Soils Report.
• Review Title Reports for the two parcels.
• Contact the residents on adjacent properties to the proposed land for dedication.
• Direct the Park and Recreation Commission to hold a hearing on the proposed dedication and
to make recommendations to the City Council.
• Analyze alternative ownership structures for the proposed dedication.
• Determine if there are ADA requirements for access to the proposed dedication.
• Quantify the additional maintenance and liability costs to the City of the proposed dedication.
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT I Page: 3
ANALYSIS:
1. Relationship to San Rafael General Plan 2020
As noted above, the General Plan 2020 designates the two lots in the "Hillside Residential" land use
category. The contiguous Oakwood Open Space is designated "Open Space." If the offered lots were
accepted for permanent open space, the policies and programs of the General Plan 2020 Open Space
Element would be relevant. The following are key Open Space Element policies and programs to
consider in this offer:
Policy OS -1. Open Space Preservation. Preserve, through a variety of methods, the open space
areas identified in the Inventory of Potential Open Space Sites (See Appendix I). Retain and
protect open space areas that serve as delineators between neighborhoods and between adjacent
communities, as wildlife habitat, and as visual assets for the community. Open space areas can
also function as connections between neighborhoods, for example with the creation of pathways in
environmentally appropriate areas.
Response: Overall, the City of San Rafael has done a good job in preserving land in permanent
open space. The City contains over 3,285 acres of land in permanent open space, along with an
additional 7,300 acres of permanent open space within the City's planning area. The Oakwood
Open Space that is contiguous to the subject lots was preserved through the development review
process. This open space provides wildlife habitat and a pathway connection between
neighborhoods, and serves as a visual backdrop to several neighborhoods. The subject lots are not
on the inventory of potential open space.
Program OS -1b. Preservation Opportunities. Through the development review process, preserve
open space areas identified on the Open Space Inventory. Encourage the dedication of open
space areas that are adjacent to public open space. Possibilities also include acquisition of fee title
or requiring easements for preserving open space. When potential open space is not contiguous to
existing public open space, the preference is to retain open space in private ownership....
Response: The City's development review process for creating the two subject lots resulted in
securing the contiguous Oakwood Open Space. As this policy encourages the dedication of open
space areas that are adjacent to public open space, preserving the subject lots and accepting a
dedication in -fee title would be consistent with this policy.
Program OS -2a. Open Space Management Plan(s). Establish a committee with representatives
from neighborhood associations, environmental organizations, user groups and other stakeholders
to prepare an open space management plan. The management plan should address appropriate
access points, parking areas, public information signage, trail extensions, restoration of erosion and
other degraded areas, and guidelines for the location of amenities such as picnic tables and
benches...
Response: To date, the City has not developed or adopted an open space management plan. At
present, the City does not provide any active maintenance of City -owned open space, including
Oakwood Open Space and this practice is not likely to change in the short-term.
Policy OS- 3. Open Space Use.
Protect and preserve the natural value of open space and wildlife habitat areas while permitting
educational and recreational uses compatible with these resources. Specific use objectives include:
a. Open space areas should be maintained in a natural state.
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 4
b. Open space areas are a community resource for use and enjoyment by the residents of San
Rafael.
c. Uses of open space areas shall be secondary to open space preservation, and limited to those
uses with a minimal impact on the environment.
Response: The preservation of the subject lots would be consistent with this policy and would
ensure that the lots will stay in a natural state.
Policy OS- 4. Access to Open Space.
Encourage provision of access to open space areas in the design of adjacent development. Secure
access paths shown on Exhibit 34 as part of subdivision approvals and design access paths to
avoid or minimize neighborhood and user conflicts with sensitive wildlife habitat areas.
Response: Exhibit 34 identifies the terminus of Greenwood Avenue as a potential access to the
Oakwood open space. The preservation of the subject lots would memorialize this access for
public use. At present, the sole access to the Oakwood Open Space from this location is through
the subject lots. Should the lots be accepted for permanent open space, there will be the potential
for increase in use, which typically brings an increase in traffic, parking, pedestrian and biking use.
In addition to the Open Space Element, the General Plan 2020 Safety and Housing Elements should be
considered in reviewing the proposal. First, the City's resource maps that support the Safety Element
identify that the lots are located in an area of slope instability. A site inspection found steep slopes with
some signs of erosion and failure along the edges of the graded trail. This characteristic is common to
hillsides in San Rafael.
Second, preserving these lots as open space would eliminate them from the City's inventory of vacant
residential lots that support new housing opportunities. As noted above, these lots are the only lots in
the Oakwood Subdivision that are vacant.
Should the City accept this offer of dedication, several follow-up actions will be required. An
amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map will be required to change the land use designation
from the current Hillside Residential to Parks/Open Space (P/OS). Second, a rezoning of the two lots
would be required to change the current R -1a -H District to P/OS District. Lastly, a lot consolidation
would need to be recorded to combine these lots with the contiguous Oakwood Open Space.
2. Current Policy on City Acceptance of Land In Fee Title:
About 20 years ago, the City changed its policy (unwritten) regarding the acceptance of in -fee title
offers of land for permanent open space and parkland. This policy change was largely due to an
increase in the City's liability associated with accepting land with slope hazards (landslides/unstable
sloped) and fire hazards (limited ability to provide adequate vegetation management), as well as
reduced enforcement (policing use and encampment abatement). As the City is now self-insured, the
liability exposure is even higher.
In recent years, permanent open space has been secured through easements with the underlying fee
title to such property retained in private ownership. This current policy has even been applied to the
more recent rejection of active park land (e.g. Village at Loch Lomond Marina publicly -accessible
shoreline park).
Historically, when potential open space land has been deemed to be of County -wide significance and
contiguous to County -owned open space, fee title was transferred to the County of Marin. As the 30+
acre Oakwood Open Space is isolated and not contiguous to County open space, the County would not
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 5
be an available steward. The proposal for the City to accept the subject lots in fee title would not be
consistent with the current unwritten policy.
3. City Staff Review and Summary:
City staff from Community Services, Police, Public Works, Fire, City Attorney's Office and Community
Development met to discuss the proposal, the City's current policies and the property conditions and
characteristics. The following is a summary and outcome of City staff review:
Accepting an offer of dedication in fee title would NOT be consistent with City's unwritten policy
that has been followed for many years.
If City were to accept the proposed offer, such acceptance might NOT compromise or conflict
with our longstanding policy in that:
o 1) the two subject lots are contiguous to what we already own and manage;
o 2) dedication of these lots would be a 10% land addition to the current Oakwood Open
Space holdings (33+ acres) of the City;
0 3) these lots serve as City/public access to City -owned public open space; and
o 4) the City already has utility infrastructure and access easements on these lots which
the City maintains. Further, the preservation of these lots and acceptance of ownership
in fee title would be consistent with Open Space Element Program OS -1 b (Preservation
Opportunities) in that these lots are contiguous to open space land that is presently
owned by the City of San Rafael.
The addition of the proposed properties will increase City responsibility for vegetation
management; property management, security, and enforcement, requiring more staff and
resources or alternatively, proportionately fewer resources for existing open space holdings.
The neighboring property owners and residents should be contacted to inform them of this offer
of dedication. Should the lots be accepted for public open space, open space access signs may
be posted, which could increase usage and parking at the terminus of Greenwood Avenue.
The Parks & Recreation Commission should review the offer and provide a recommendation to
the City Council.
4. Response to City Council Issues
The City Council in its informational review on September 6, 2016, directed staff to return with more
information on the following issues:
A. Review of Site Geology and Soil Conditions
The City received a copy of the geotechnical investigation (Geotechnical Investigation Lee
Property Development- San Rafael, Miller Pacific Engineering Group, May 29, 2002), which was
commissioned by the property owner and prepared in 2002. This investigation was prepared to
assess the site geology and soil conditions and to present recommendations for lot grading and
development. Included in the investigation are the results of soil sampling and test borings, as
well as documentation of observed slope stability and landslides. The following is a summary of
the investigation findings:
• The report notes that there are areas of sluffing along the cut banks of the graded trail,
but the condition is not critical. This sluffing is apparent when walking the trail and was
created as a result of the grading for the trail.
• There is one slide at the south end of the upper lot (Lot 22A), which extends 50 feet up
the slope. This slide is localized.
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 6
There is a larger slide upslope on the City -owned Oakwood Open Space.
Based on the geotechnical engineer's observation, the potential for rapid slide
movement and debris avalanches associated with the small slide on Lot 22A and larger
slide located on the City -owned Open Space is not high. However, the report notes that
there were no other observations of slope instability except that creep forces (slow
movement) may exist.
The recommendations presented in the report are focused on and specific to measures
for grading and construction. While there are no recommendations that are specific to
separate slope or landslide repair for addressing life/safety, the report recommends the
installation of a debris flow catchment basin at the base of the drainage swale that is
between the two subject lots. The purpose of the basin is to catch debris to reduce the
risk of damaging planned improvements on these lots and downslope property.
The Public Works Director has reviewed the above findings and recommendations of the
investigations. As the recommended debris flow catchment basin is primarily recommended for
the benefit of protecting the improvements resulting from lot development, its need is not critical
if the lots are not developed. The Public Works Director suggests that the City can provide
localized maintenance of the sluffed areas with periodic "touch-ups," as necessary to ensure
there is a clear water path on the upslope of the dirt road. The cost of installing the debris flow
catchment basin will far exceed its value as the greater slide area that is upslope of these lots is
on City -owned Open Space, where the City presently holds liability.
The Soils Report appears as Attachment 3.
B. Review of Preliminary Title Report
The City received a copy of the Preliminary Title Report, prepared by Stewart Title of California
(July 6, 2016), included in this Report as Attachment 4 The two lots are encumbered by a
number of easements for varying purposes. The City Attorney's Office reviewed the Report and
the documents referred to therein, and determined no outstanding title issues exist.
C. Outreach to Residents of the neighboring properties to the subject parcels
The community was notified of the Park and Recreation Commission meeting through posting of
the meeting Agenda, direct mail to MOST and the donors, Gerstle Park Neighborhood
Association web site and membership distribution, along with social media.
A notice of the October 3, 2016 City Council Meeting with invitation to attend and/or contact City
staff regarding issues or concerns, was mailed to addresses within 300 feet of the subject
properties. The Notice was mailed on September 21, 2016. Response and additional
correspondence is attached to this report as Attachment 5 and will be updated if necessary at
the City Council Meeting. To date no issues have been raised by immediate neighbors to the
subject properties, nor has the City received expressed opposition to the proposal.
City staff directly contacted two of the immediately contiguous properties downslope from the
subject lots (owners of 169 Greenwood Avenue and 14 Sierra Circle). Neither property owner is
opposed to the City's acceptance of these lots for open space or the memorialization of public
trail access. Further, neither property owner reported any problems of slope instability.
However, the property owner of 14 Sierra Circle noted that he installed a debris catchment
basin a number of years ago to provide protection from the inactive slide that is located on a
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 7
portion of the upper Greenwood Avenue lot (referenced above). The property owner noted that
catchment structure has worked well and there has been no slide activity for many years.
D. Ownership Structure
MOST responded to the Council inquiry regarding alternative ownership structures to the City
receiving full title. The copy of their response is attached as Attachment 6.
MOST is not a land management entity. It has no legal or organizational capacity to hold fee
title to the subject properties or maintain it going forward.
Marin County Open Space District (MCOSD) is the only public entity identified qualified to hold
fee title and manage open space lands. In the past the District has accepted dedication of
Open Space from the City of San Rafael where such land is contiguous to land already held by
the County. The subject properties do not meet that criterion. Transfer of ownership to MCOSD
is not a viable option.
Marin Agricultural Land Trust (MALT) operates within an ownership model that partners with
LLCs who hold title to agricultural lands. The LLCs, ranchers and farmers for instance, deed
over the development rights to their properties to MALT, which in turn exercises those rights to
preserve the lands for future public use. MOST does not have the capacity to hold development
rights.
The donors of the subject properties are not willing to take title and grant a public easement
over the property, as this option requires the individuals, or possibly an LLC, to accept liability
for the management and maintenance of the property in addition to the tax liability on the two
parcels.
In the recent past, there have been examples of Special Assessment Districts (Sun Valley),
Lighting and Landscape Districts, (Peacock, Glenwood, Loch Lomond neighborhoods) and a
Mello -Roos District (Village at Loch Lomond developer) formulated to purchase property, install
and maintain median landscape, and maintain public areas such as in the new amenities within
the Loch Lomond development. These user assessment models are subject to 66% voter
approval within the defined assessment areas. They have far reaching community interest and
value, and add priority improvements to the assessment areas.
The subject properties are much smaller in scale and community impact. They increase the
existing Open Space held by the City by less than 10%. There are no significant improvements
required or requested by the community to continue access to the Oakwood Open Space. To
date no constituency or organization has approached the City with interest in ownership or
financial support to offset the City costs for liability and maintenance of the subject properties.
If the City is not prepared or willing to accept the offer of dedication from MOST in its current
structure, MOST will withdraw the offer. The subject properties will remain in private ownership
and subject to development.
E. ADA Access Requirements
No improvements are anticipated to the subject properties if accepted by the City, with the
exception of signage. No required ADA access requirements are triggered by the change in
ownership.
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 8
F. Estimated Liability and Maintenance Costs
The City has no formal management infrastructure for Open Space. Police, Fire, and Public
Works Departments respond to emergency calls for service in Open Space. There is no
landscape or environmental remediation on Open Space lands, unless there is impact on
surrounding properties. The Wild Land Urban Interface program, under San Rafael Fire
Department, for example, addresses fuel reduction defensible space on Open Space, with
adjacent property owners. The Police Department seasonal Park Rangers survey Open Space
areas for encampment activity. Public Works performs routine annual clean outs of City
drainage systems in Open Space, including the catch basin on the utility easement across the
subject properties. These functions are currently absorbed in the budgets of the three
departments. The addition of 3 acres to the existing Oakwood Open Space will minimally, if at
all affect the cost of the current levels of service.
Acceptance of the dedication of the subject lots will potentially expose the City to additional
liability. However, there is no history of claims against the current owner for impacts to adjacent
properties, nor is the City aware of information that any interface on the subject properties
resulted in injury or damage. There is no indication that the acquisition will impose substantial
additional liability risk or cost.
5. Commission Review
The Park and Recreation Commission convened on September 15, 2016 and held a hearing on the
proposed dedication. There were 26 members of the public in attendance for the hearing. MOST
made the presentation on the proposal. Statements of support were made by 8 residents.
Correspondence was received from 11 proponents of the proposal. There were no comments or
correspondence received in opposition to the proposal. At the conclusion of the discussion the
Commission voted unanimously to recommend acceptance of MOST's in fee dedication of the land to
the City of San Rafael.
The Minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission Meeting, September 15, 2016 are included in this
report in Attachment 7.
Staff concludes the dedication of the two vacant lots at the terminus of Greenwood Avenue will not
significantly impact the City financially and, by supplementing the existing Oakwood Open Space, will
benefit the public with direct and legal access to the Open Space while preserving the environmental
and recreation value of the property. The proposal has support of neighbors, community residents, and
three community organizations: the Gerstle Park Neighborhood Association, San Rafael Heritage, and
the Marin Conservation League. The Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City
accept the proposal for dedication of the land for permanent open space. No opposition to the proposal
has been expressed.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The offer of land dedication and property transfer tasks would be of negligible cost to the City.
However, with this action, the City would accept the legal liability and maintenance responsibilities for
these lots, a minimal increase of City resources as described above.
At this time, it is uncertain whether there would be a longer-term fiscal impact on the City.
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 9
OPTIONS:
The City Council has the following options to consider on this matter:
1. Approve the Resolution
2. Request an extension of the MOST proposal and direct staff to return with more information
3. Reject the proposal
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Resolution Accepting the Offer of
Dedication from Marin Open Space Trust of Two Vacant Lots at the End of Greenwood Avenue, APNs
012-320-01 and -10, to the City in Fee for Permanent Open Space; Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute, on Behalf of the City, all Documents Required to Effectuate Such Conveyance; and Directing
Staff to Initiate Corresponding Amendments to the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Attachment 7
Greenwood Avenue Lots, Vicinity Map, Aerial Phot of Lots, Oakwood
Subdivision Map, Assessor's Parcel Map
Letter to the City of San Rafael from MOST Summarizing Offer of Dedication,
July 20, 2016
Soils Report, Geotechnical Investigation Lee Property Development -San
Rafael, Miller Pacific Engineering Group, May 29, 2002
Title Report, Preliminary Title Report, prepared by Stewart Title of California,
July 6, 2016
Correspondence to the City Council and the Park and Recreation Commission
and Meeting Notice
MOST Response to City Council
Minutes, Park and Recreation Commission, September 15, 2016 Pages 1-5
RESOLUTION NO. 14211
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF DEDICATION FROM MARIN OPEN SPACE TRUST
(MOST) OF TWO VACANT LOTS AT THE END OF GREENWOOD AVENUE, APNS
012-320-09 AND -10, TO THE CITY IN FEE FOR PERMANENT OPEN SPACE;
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY,
ALL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO EFFECTUATE SUCH CONVEYANCE; AND
DIRECTING STAFF TO INITIATE CORRESPONDING AMENDMENTS TO THE
CITY'S GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the Oakwood Subdivision in the Gerstle Park Neighborhood was recorded in
1987; and
WHEREAS, the City accepted a donation of 33 acres of the Oakwood Subdivision for
permanent Open Space; and
WHEREAS, of the 47 residential parcels in the Oakwood Subdivision, all but two were
developed and sold; and
WHEREAS, the undeveloped, Lots 2 1 A and 22A, comprise approximately 3 acres located
at the terminus of Greenwood Avenue and contain a fire road and a footpath; and
WHEREAS, the foot path is utilized by the public to access the City -owned Oakwood
Open Space contiguous to Lots 2 1 A and 22A; and
WHEREAS, Marin Open Space Trust (MOST) received an offer of donation of Lots 21A
and 22A and now proposes to transfer title, in fee, to the City of San Rafael for use as permanent
open space as part of the Oakwood Open Space; and
WHEREAS, the dedication proposal was reviewed by the City Council at a regular
meeting on September 6, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposal at a regular
meeting on September 15, 2016, and recommended acceptance of the dedication by the City
Council; and
WHEREAS, the public comments at those public meetings, and correspondence prior and
after, were unanimously in support of the City accepting the proposed dedication; and
WHEREAS, staff of the Police, Fire, Public Works, Community Development,
Community Services and City Attorney's Office deemed the acceptance of the donation to be of
minimal impact to City resources.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Rafael
as follows:
1. The City Council hereby accepts the offer of dedication from Marin Open Space Trust
(MOST) of two vacant lots at the end of Greenwood Avenue, A.P.N.'s 012-320-09 and
-10, to the City in fee, for permanent open space.
2. The City Manager is hereby authorized, on behalf of the City, to execute all documents
required to effectuate such conveyance.
City Staff is hereby directed to initiate any amendments to the City's General Plan and
Zoning Ordinance required as a consequence of the dedication of the parcels to the City
for permanent open space.
I, Esther Beirne, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the San Rafael
City Council held on October 3, 2016 by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers: Bushey, Gamblin, McCullough & Mayor Phillips
NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: Colin
oe
ESTHER C. BEIRNE, City Clerk
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
11 Stewart Title of California, Inc.
11/ [-a re -c v -L h,-7 c -
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
MAIL TAX STATEMENT TO:
The Ciy of San Rafael
1300 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, CA 94901
ORDER NO.
ESCROW NO. 01180-202165
APN: 012-320-09 & 012-320-10
`017-0001 aa4
Recorded
Official Records
County of
Marin
RICHARD N. BENSON
Assessor -Recorder
County Clerk
01:53PM 10 -Jan -2017
REC FEE 0.00
KS
Page 1 of 5
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE
GRANT DEED
THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s) DECLARE(s) R&T 11922 GC 27383
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX is: $' CITY TAX $"
Monument Preservation Fee is: $`
computed on full value of property conveyed, or
computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances
remaining at time of sale.
Unincorporated area: ` City of San Rafael
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Vincent H. Lee, a married man, as his sole and separate property
e -g da--,
hereby GRANT(S) to The Ziy-of San Rafael, a municipal corporation
M
the following described real property in the City of San Rafael, County of Marin, State of California:
Fi3n P1ErRMIIAHENT OPEC\! SPACE
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO and EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO
Date: Dece Ker 19, 2016
Vincent H. Lee
,2—i_4=, -?t
File No.: 01180-202165
Grant Deed Sale BP SCE
U
MAILTAX STATEMENTAS DIRECTEDABOVE
Page 1 of 3
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the
identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate
is attached and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of d�e�
County of `)�L� (,c i-
f 1"
Q . % 0--q 10-016 before me JckC- tx • ��CCa Notary Public personally appeared
` V L4L eil[ f H , 4–ex-- , who proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence to be the person(&), whose name) is/afe subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/
-ahefthey executed the same in his/heFAheir authorized capacity(tes), and that by his/her/their signature on the instrument the person
N or the entity upon behalf of which the person(t) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
U (seal)
`;"'��• JACKIE L. SOCCABELLA !�
• � °-1 COMM. #2100322 M
`' •`` gg� NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA A
5t;r LU
MARIN COUNTY
� fR;Sii. fr
My Comm. Expires Feb. 18, 2019
t�,..y..w..,n,.,.,,..V...r,...,,,...r,..,..�,.
File No.: 01180-202165 Page 2 of 3
Grant Deed Sale BP SCE
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lots 21A and 22A, as shown upon that certain Parcel Map entitled "Parcel Map Showing Lot Line
Adjustments of Lots 18 through 22 of Map of Oakwood Unit 2, filed in Book 19 of Maps, at Page 11,
etc., City of San Rafael, County of Marin, State of California", filed for record September 14, 1988 in
Book 24 of Parcel Maps. at Paae 29, Marin County Records.
File No.: 01180-202165 Page 3 of 3
Grant Deed Sale BP SCE
RECORDING REQUESTED BY -
Stewart T le of California, Inc.
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
MAIL TAX. STATEMENT TO:
The Ciy of San Rafael
1300 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, CA 94901
ORDER NO.
ESCROW NO. 01180-202165
APN: 012-320-09 & 012-320-10
0/7- 460/9-7"
STEWARTUifiX
Qf CALIFORNIA
here byy((cet► b a VLjkand cokBy
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE
GRANT DEED
THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s) DECLARE(s)
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX is: $• CITY TAX $•
Monument Preservation Fee is: S'
computed on full value of property conveyed, or
computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances
remaining at time of sale.
' Unincorporated area: • City of San Rafael
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Vincent H. Lee, a married man, as his sole and separate property
hereby GRANT(S) to The Ciy of San Rafael, a municipal corporation
the following described real property in the City of San Rafael, County of Marin, State of California
FOR PERMANENT OPEN SPACE
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO and
Date: Dece er 19, 2016
Vincent H. Lee
F'de No 01180.202165
Grant Deed Sale BP SCE
EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO
MAIL TAX STATEMENT AS DIRECTED ABOVE
Page 1 of 3
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the
Identlty of the Individual who signed the document to which this certificate
II Is attached and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of '✓ ,t ( �" / ( - ! 1c( e'_
County of ` ) k /t. i r 1-
On �� "Z �� '=� G before me J<kc ' c L Oc fC a. bi-L l)&.. Nolary Puhlir. nersnnaliv annuarcrl
I+, Ij-k N who proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence to be the person(s), whose nameN is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/
-sheithey executed the same in his/herftheir authorized capacity(tes) and that by his/her/their signatureN on the instrument the person
(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the personN acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Ignature Ito k-,(
File No 01180-202165
Grant Deed Sale BP SCE
fi c c ttSL 0111
(seal)
JACKIE L. t30CCABELLA
COMM. #2100322 m
NOTARY PU[1LIC - CALlFCRNEA
-Wj MARIN COUNTY -+
1 '45 My Comm. Expkee Feb. 18, 2019
Page 2 of 3
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lots 21A and 22A, as shown upon that certain Parcel Map entitled "Parcel Map Showing Lot Line
Adjustments of Lots 18 through 22 of Map of Oakwood Unit 2, filed in Book 19 of Maps, at Page 11,
etc., City of San Rafael, County of Marin, State of California", filed for record September 14, 1988 in
Book 24 of Parcel Maps. at Paae 29, Marin County Records.
File No 01180-202165 Page 3 of 3
Grant Oeed Sale BP SCE
stewart title-
January
12, 2017
The Ciy of San Rafael
1300 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, CA 94901
RE: Escrow No. 01180-202165
PropertyAddress APN: 012-320-09&012-320-10, San Rafael, CA
Stewart Title of California, Inc.
300A Drakes Landing Rd, Suite 100
Greenbrae, CA 94904
Phone (415) 461-7474
Fax
The above escrow closed on January 10, 2017; in connection therewith we enclose the following:
Check in the amount of $181.54
Final Closing Statement (PLEASE RETAIN FOR TAX PURPOSES)
Recorded documents to which you are entitled will be mailed to you by the County Recorder's Office.
Any other documents to which you may be entitled will be forwarded to you as soon as they are available
COUNTY TAXES ON REAL PROPERTY ARE DUE AS FOLLOWS:
First installment due November 1st and delinquent after December 10th - and Second installment due
February 1 st and delinquent after April 10th. If you do not receive a Tax Bill one month prior to the due
date, please contact your County Tax Collector.
Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you in this transaction. We look forward to working with
you again.
Sincerely,
Stewart Title of California, Inc.
Deana Jerejian
Branch Operations Manager
A R-4 r-5
F5CY30i
Escrow No.: 01180-202165 Page 1 of 1
Close Letter Buyer 1 BP SCE
Al T'ACHMENS' 1
Greenwood Avenue Lots
Vicinity Map, Aerial Phot® of Lots, Oakwood Subdivision Map,
Assessor's Parcel Map
7/20/2016 SanRafad
13251.94x9659.42 (ft)
K: —, Y: -- 1 feature(s) selected on 1 byer(s)
httpJ/gis.city.local/sarrafael/ 1/1
N
�U
_O
�U
N
.�
PO Li Pl-r H
GREEN p -it_ -C70 AVE
ST eND AVE -
Lots I th"a 17 "GlDlrin8d'
U M Ir LO-rS 18 iiiir#All "GreemjocA
Unit S Lots 23 21 Uepe-ir OV)SI
QIP Onir5 4$j
with L o -r 5 26 tkrq 3Z P -44'a vt aa to fv%', game
131010 1 Preserve Areas
hots -6%r Wklc-� Design Review
goes to PI&VIVII'VJ) comNistlon
oe� FO
cr.ESP'
Ox
(ORI
Mat
'34A
-j
Y
W.
CSo'�c yew / A ,r� \�'�v�`".
Dr
J12
0 100 200 300 400 500 �9c
Sr -AL -E IN FEET Z.
pk,dzfv.la by Savi AILkel elpAn,vii,
DeYOA'C'ryt)CYlT 3/3/97 .3.37
Miis NlApy-d4-IeCTS L6T- Cov)-J�OI&vix-rion
as 0-�- 1/21/0'7
J^0TA K
V IWA� MAP F5 13 2
Eel
W�
Baa.
QakwoodUnit2, R.M B*. 19-P9.11
---
01
rax Rate Area
8-000
i2 -
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Assessor's Map Bk. I2—Pg.32
County of Marin, Calif.
ATTCHMENT 2
Letter to the City of San Rafael From Most Summarizing Offer of
Dedication, July 20, 2016
Board Members
Bill Long, Chair
David Hansen, Vice Chair
Ralph Mihan, Secretary
Ann Thomas, Treasurer
Joyce Applen, Member
Jonathan Braun, Member
Don Dickenson, Member
-Marin Open Space Trust
James Schutz,
City Manager, City of San Rafael
July 20, 2016
The Marin Open Space Trust (MOST) had been contacted to assist in the acquisition
of two undeveloped lots at the end of Greenwood Ave, referred to as the Makin Grade
lots, in San Rafael.
The MOST Board authorized the entering into an Offer to Purchase for $399,000 the
two lots from the seller (Lee) and deposited $20,000 to secure the offer. The offer
expires 90 days from July 7. The funding for the acquisition is from a neighborhood
source and MOST is picking up the related acquisition costs.
MOST desires to transfer the lots to the City, free of any costs, at the close of escrow,
to add to The City's adjoining existing Open Space.
ADVISORY COUNCIL
Al Boro
Al Baumann
Barry Spitz
Connie Serto
Dan Rheiner
Dennis Scremin
Douglas Ferguson
Fran Brigmann
Gail Wilhelm
Gary Giacomini
Jared Huffman
Jean Starkweather
Jeff Saperstein
Fred Kanter
Samaria Jaffee
John Leonard
John Leydecker
Ron Miska
Liza Crosse
Karen Wilson
L. Martin Griffin
Leland Jordan
Linda Novy
Michael Dvbeck
Mimi Newton
Patty Garbarino
Sharon McNamee
Susan Ives
Susan Stompe
George Brewster.
Tom Forster
Terry Toner
Ideally MOST would like to have title transfer to the City in a three party closing of
escrow. MOST has done that with the Marin County Open Space District for the acquisition
of the Pacheco Meadows addition to the Loma Verde Open Space Preserve. Title passed
directly from the private seller to the County while MOST deposited the purchase price
into the escrow.
MOST looks forward to a timely acceptance of title by the City to the lots.
Please advise if there is anything further that MOST needs to do to complete this transaction.
Bill Long, Board Ch�
cc Ralph Mihan, Board Secretary
Don Dickerson, Board Member
www.marinopenspacetrust.org
415-884 2270
P.O. Sox 4133
San Rafael, CA 94913
"SAVXX(3 1424R_191_,� OPEN SPACE"
At no acquisition cost to the City, acquire two undeveloped lots on Makin
Grade to add to the contiguous San Rafael Open Space above Greenwood
Avenue, providing neighborhood trail access to open space along the historic
route of the San Rafael- Bolinas stagecoach line.
The lots (3.11 acres) will be acquired by the Marin Open Space Trust
(MOST) and conveyed directly to the City at close of escrow as an addition
to the existing City Open Space lands (30.35 acres).
II History of the sale of the lots:
The lots were purchased by the present owner (Lee) in 1999 for
$450,000. He sold the lots for $730,000 in 2006 just before the
real estate market crash of 2008 but that sale resulted in a default
and Lee took title back and put the lots back on the market again.
With the lots on the market on and off for over 16 nears, the seller
became very anxious to sell them and in June reduced the price
to $399,000.
With this recent reduction, the neighbors who have long sought to
preserve the property's natural beauty, ecological values and historic
resources decided that this opportunity should not be ignored.
Realizing that the City was not in a position to purchase the land,
the neighbors contacted MOST to assist in the acquisition.
In 2010 the neighborhood and other City residents met a number of
times to discuss how to retain public access along the old stagecoach
route that runs through the lots, referred to as the Makin Grade trail,
as well as the possible acquisition of the properties to enhance the
existing open space. The neighbors approached the City and were
advised that the Makin Grade Trail was under private ownership per
Paul Felton's Oakwood Subdivision Agreement and the City did not
have the money to purchase the lots.
MOST has entered into a contract to purchase with the present owner
(Lee), the purchase to be completed within 90 dans from the execution
(July 7) of the contract to purchase. MOST intends to transfer title to
the City at the closing of escrow.
V. Source of Funding:
Gerstle Park neighbors have provided the initial deposit of $20,000 to
secure the right to purchase and have committed to the funding of the
purchase price of $399,000. MOST has agreed to cover the transaction
costs related to the acquisition.
VI. Reasons for seeking to preserve the land:
a. It is directly contiguous to adjacent existing 30.38 acres of
City Open Space Lands. (See attached map)
b. It is a logical addition to existing City Open Space at no acquisition
cost to the City. This would be in accord with City's 2020
General Plan (See V below)
c. It will preserve the land for public use. The land contains portions
of a very frequently used trail (Historic Makin Grade) that is directly
linked to the existing City Open Space trail network. The trail network
is used extensively by neighbors and other City residents enjoying
the City Open Space lands and Gerstle Park itself.
(See attached map.)
d. It will preserve the wildlife activities both on the property and on
the adjacent existing open space and biological reserves. Wildlife
observed in the area include spotted owl, gray fox, coyote, bobcat,
deer, pileated woodpecker, winter wren, Wilson and orange
crowned warblers, red -shouldered hawk and numerous other
species.
e. It will prevent disruptions that would otherwise occur. The property
is steeply sloped and any construction would be extremely disruptive
to the natural terrain, cause severe degradation of the existing flora
and disruption of the abundant fauna living on or foraging on the lots.
Acquisition would preserve a pristine natural canyon including an
ephemeral stream natural watercourse.
Vii Citv 2020 General Plan
The San Rafael 2020 General Plan in subsection OS -1b Preservation
Opportunities provides in pertinent part:
".... Encourage the dedication of open space areas that are adjacent to
public open space. Possibilities also include acquisition of fee title or
acquiring easements for preserving open space....."
(The complete subsection is attached.)
Vlll Public Utilities
Makin Grade Trail contains existing public sewer lines and a storm
drain culvert and storm drain pipes linked to Greenwood Ave pipes
and storm drains.
IX History
The two lots are an integral part of the historic Makin Grade
Stagecoach Road that once ran from San Rafael to the town
of Bolinas. The stagecoach road was established about 1878. From
Bolinas it made its way over many ridges and eventually through
what is now the town of Ross. It then ran along a portion of present
day Laurel Grove Ave then across the Makin property.* From there
it wound up Makin Grade Road in Ross (now a street in Ross)
and then across Upper Toyon and down what is the present last
remnant of the unpaved Makin Grade Stagecoach Road (now a
hiking trail) to Greenwood Avenue. (On Greenwood it passed
what was at one time the Bowen & Goert San Rafael Brewery. * )
The stagecoach road then followed along portions of what are
now Madera, Clorinda, Reservoir, and Ross St, then up D Street
to stables near San Rafael's main street, 4t" Street.
NOTE: As Makin Grade Road comes down from the ridge it
crosses the two lots that are the subject of this acquisition.
* The Makin Family, the granddaughter of the famed James Ross,
pioneer of the Ross Valley, gave permission for the stagecoach
road to cross their land. Hence the name Makin Grade was given
to the stagecoach road.
** See attached map of 1878 showing the location of the brewery.
San Rafael 2020 General Plan
OS -1b. Preservation Opportunities. Through the development review process,
preserve open space areas identified on the Open Space Inventory. Encourage
the dedication of oven space areas that are adjacent to public open space.
Possibilities also include acquisition of fee title or acquiring easements for
Preservina open space. When potential open space is not contiguous to existing
public open space, the preference is to retain the open space in private
ownership_ When portions of a site are retained as private open space, ensure
the preservation and management of that open space through appropriate
means, including required maintenance, as determined though development
review. Work with other public and non-profit agencies to identify sources for
acquisition and maintenance of open space. Responsibility: Community
Development, Public Works, City Manager Timeframe: Ongoing Resources: Fees,
Grants, Donations, Bonds
\J1
ATTCHMENT 3
Soils Report
Geotechnical Investigation Lee Property Development — San Rafael,
Miller Pacific Engineering Group, May 29, 2002
504 Redwood Blvd.
Suite 220
Novato, California 94947
T 415 1382-3444
F 4151382-3450
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
LEE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA
May 29, 2002
Job No. 912.01
Prepared For:
Vince Lee
74 Grove Lane
San Rafael, California
CERTIFICATION
This document is an instrument of service, prepared by or under the direction of the undersigned professionals, in accordance with
the current ordinary standard of care. The service specifically excludes the investigation of polychlorinated byphenols, radon,
asbestos or any other hazardous materials. The document is for the sole use of the client and consultants on this project. No other
use is authorized. If the project" changes, or more than two years have passed since issuance of this report, the findings and
recommendations must be updated.
MILLER PACIFIC ENGINEERING GROUP
(a California corporation)
Ian A. Maclean
Civil Engineer No. 61721
(Expires 6/30/05)
�-.,,t/lichael J. Dvo6r
Certified Engineering Geologist No. 782
(Expires 3/31/03)
REVIEWED BY
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
LEE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
Page 1
A.
Purpose and Scope of Services
1
B.
Previous Site Geologic and Geotechnical Reconnaissance
1
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3
III. SITE
CONDITIONS
4
A.
Regional Geologic Setting
4
B.
Previous Regional Geologic Studies
4
C.
Aerial Photograph Interpretation
4
D.
Site Geology
4
E.
Seismicity
6
F.
Geotechnical Exploration and Subsurface Conditions
8
G.
Laboratory Testing
9
H.
Groundwater
9
IV. GEOLOGIC
HAZARDS EVALUATION
10
A.
Summary
10
B.
Fault Surface Rupture
10
C.
Seismic Shaking
10
D.
Lurching and Ground Cracking
11
E.
Liquefaction Potential and Related Impacts
12
F.
Erosion
12
G.
Expansive Soils
12
H.
Settlement
13
I.
Flooding
13
J.
Slope Stability
13
K.
Debris Flow
14
V. CONCLUSIONS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
15
A.
Conclusions
15
B.
Seismic Design
15
C.
Site Grading
15
D.
Site Drainage
17
E.
Crawlspace and Foundation Drainage
18
F.
Foundation Recommendations
19
G.
Retaining Wall Design
19
H.
Concrete Slabs
22
I.
Utility Trench Excavations and Backfill
22
J.
Driveway Subgrade Preparation and Pavement Structural Section
23
VI. PLAN REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
24
LIST OF REFERENCES
25
FIGURES
Site Location Map
Figure 1
Site Plan
2
Active Fault Map
3
Typical Hillside Fill Construction
4
Typical Subdrain Detail for Buttress Keyways and Benches
5
Typical Foundation Drain Detail
6
Typical Crawlspace Drainage Plan
7
Reinforced Earthwall for Roadway
8
Retaining Wall Backdrain Criteria
9
APPENDIX A, SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
Soil Classification Chart Figure A-1
Rock Classification Chart A-2
Boring Logs A-3 to A-10
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
LEE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Purpose and Scope of Services
This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed Lee property
development in San Rafael, California. The project site is located beyond the end of
Greenwood Avenue in San Rafael. The site location is shown on Figure 1. This report was
prepared for the exclusive use of Vince Lee and the design team for this project and site. No
other use is authorized without written consent of Miller Pacific Engineering Group.
The purpose of our investigation was to explore subsurface conditions and develop
geotechnical criteria for design of the residence foundations, driveway extension, and site
grading. The scope of our geotechnical investigation included review of stereo -paired air
photographs, review of available geologic reports, reconnaissance -level geologic mapping,
subsurface exploration with 8 test borings, laboratory testing, engineering evaluation, and
development of recommendations appropriate for the project and site. The following
geotechnical considerations were addressed:
(1) Brief summary of local geology and expected subsurface conditions.
(2) Geologic hazards including slope stability and seismicity.
(3) Recommendations for site preparation, grading and compaction and imported fill (if
needed).
(4) Subsurface drainage requirements.
(5) Seismic Design Criteria, including 1997 UBC Coefficients and near -source factors.
(6) Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria.
(7) Criteria for retaining wall design, including active pressures, passive pressure, at -rest
soil pressure, and allowable bearing pressures.
(8) Preliminary pavement design sections.
(9) Recommendations for backfill of utility trenches.
B. Previous Site Geoloqic and Geotechnical Reconnaissance
We have reviewed previous geotechnical and geologic reports made available to the owner, Vince
Lee, by the previous owner of the property. The geologic and geotechnical reconnaissance were
conducted for the site as part of a larger development project known as the Oakwood Residential
Village in the early 1980's. Donald Herzog and Associates presented slope stability and geologic
assessment findings for areas including the subject property in letter reports dated 5/27/83 and
1
3/8/84. Geoengineering, Inc. presented further geotechnical assessment findings in a letter report
dated 6/22/87. A complete list of geotechnical and geologic references that were reviewed as
part of this report are contained in the References section of this report.
K
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project consists of developing two hillside lots (Lot 21A and 22A) for residential
construction on a 10 -acre parcel, and extending a driveway off the end of Greenwood Avenue to
provide access to the lots. The lots range in size from about 16,000 to 27,000 square feet. The
proposed new buildings have not yet been designed however we assume they are to be one to
two-story, wood -framed with supported wood floors and slab -on -grade garage floors. A site plan
showing the lot locations and proposed driveway alignment is shown on Figure 2. Figure 2 is
based on the conceptual site plan prepared by the project architect Volkamer Architecture dated
May 31, 2000.
Building plans have not yet been prepared, but according to the conceptual plan, retaining walls
will be used to create level garage and parking areas adjacent to the sloping house pads. The
lower portion of the new driveway will follow the old Makin Grade road alignment. The new
driveway will be raised above the road grade by excavating into the hillside. Retaining walls up to
11 -feet in height are shown along the uphill and outboard sides of this portion of the driveway.
The upper portion of the driveway diverges from the existing road. This portion will utilizing a
bridge to span an existing drainage way and retaining walls up to 9 -feet in height are shown along
the uphill and outboard sides.
3
III. SITE CONDITIONS
A. Reqional Geologic Settinq
The project site is within the northern part of the Coast Range Geomorphic Province of
California. This region is characterized by northwest- to southeast -trending mountain ranges
and intervening valleys. The origin of the Province is closely associated with tectonic activity
related to large-scale fault translations between the Pacific and the North American Plates. This
fault activity is concentrated along the San Andreas Fault and its numerous related faults. The
hilly and mountainous terrain of the Province is typically rugged, of high relief, and comprised of
diverse bedrock formations that are often broken, complexly deformed, and subject to various
types of landsliding.
B. Previous Reqional Geoloqic Studies
Rice et al. (1976) prepared geologic and slope stability maps for Central and Southeastern
Marin County. This information, which includes the project site, was reviewed by MPEG. The
maps show the project to be underlain by sandstone and shale bedrock. They describe this
bedrock as mainly thickly bedded, medium- to coarse-grained, with interbeds of dark gray shale.
These rocks belong to the Franciscan Complex. This Complex is the predominant bedrock
formation throughout the California Coast Ranges.
C. Aerial Photograph Interpretation
To observe changes in geologic conditions within and close to the project over time, a series of
stereo -paired aerial photographs taken between 1950 and 2000, were reviewed. An inventory
of these aerial photographs is contained in the References section of this report.
D. Site Geoloqv
Bedrock Geoloqv - Bedrock exposures in the Makin Grade road cuts along the downslope
periphery of the project reveal sandstone in the upper 8 to10 feet to be yellow-brown to pale
gray, massively bedded, highly weathered, closely fractured and soft to medium in rock
hardness. Shale interbeds within the sandstone were not observed in the road cuts.
Soils - With the exception of bedrock exposed in road cuts near the base of the project and in
natural and road cut exposures upslope of the project, widespread soil cover is present. Where
4
exposed along the base of the project, these soils are generally about 2 feet thick and are
clayey with included gravel -size fragments of weathered sandstone. Due to slope steepness,
the soils are probably undergoing some seasonal downslope creep movement.
Springs - Seepages or springs were not observed within the area to be developed.
Landslidina - A number of cut slope failures were observed along Makin Grade, which runs
peripheral to the project on the downslope end. These failures have involved the soil mantle
and underlying, weathered sandstone bedrock. The sliding has resulted from overly steep road
cuts that range from about 8 to nearly 20 feet in height. With one exception, these slides do not
extend upslope more than a few tens of feet from the top of the road cut. The exception is
located at the south end of Lot 22A. This slide extends upslope approximately 50 feet and may
be a combination of natural slope as well as cut slope failure. It is located outside of the area of
improvements as shown on the conceptual plan. Over time, additional cut slope failures may
develop and some of these may progress upslope a few tens of feet or slightly more. Areas of
landsliding identified during our site geologic reconnaissance are shown on Figure 2.
A landslide involving loose fractured bedrock and overlying soil was observed near the
headwaters of the drainage course. This slide, located upslope of the project, in the open space
property, deposited rock and soil into the drainage course. There is also debris in the upper
reaches of the drainage course that appears to be sidecast material from construction of Upper
Toyon Drive. Further down the drainage course and within Lot 22A, there is an isolated deposit
of landslide debris that has partially blocked the drainage course. This mass is approximately 30
feet long, 15 feet wide, and less than 10 feet in thickness. The presence of these debris
deposits suggests that slides travel down the drainage course at some widely separated time
intervals. The past failures probably occurred during wetter -than -normal winters when the soil
and near surface loose bedrock became highly saturated. The potential for, and return interval
of rapidly moving slides or debris avalanches in the drainage course is not known. Based on
our field observations, the potential does not appear to be high.
Landslides were not observed directly upslope of the building areas, including those areas
upslope beyond the lot boundaries.
5
E. Seismicitv
The site is located within the seismically active San Francisco Bay Region. It is expected that
the site will experience the effects of future earthquakes. Such earthquakes could occur on or
near any of several active faults within the region. The California Geological Survey (formerly
California Division of Mines and Geology, or CDMG) has mapped active faults in the region
(CDMG, 1994). The locations of these faults relative to the project site are shown on the Active
Fault Map, Figure 3. An "active" fault (for residential construction purposes) is one that has
been active within the last 11,000 years and therefore, is considered more likely to generate a
future earthquake than a fault that shows no sign of recent activity.
The closest known active faults to the site are the North Coast segment of the San Andreas
Fault (approximately 14 kilometers southwest) and the North branch of the Hayward fault
(approximately 16 kilometers northeast). A large magnitude earthquake on the North Coast
segment of the San Andreas could result in a median peak ground acceleration (PGA) of about
0.36g for the bedrock, resulting in strong ground shaking at the site.
Historic Fault Activitv - Numerous earthquakes have been felt in the region within historic times.
The results of our computer database search indicate that 31 earthquakes (Richter Magnitude
5.0 or larger) have occurred within 100 kilometers of the site area between 1836 and 2000.
Using empirical attenuation relationships, the maximum historic bedrock acceleration (median
peak) within the study area is approximately 0.27g. The five most significant historic
earthquakes to affect the project site are summarized in Table A.
A
TABLE A
References: Sources: USGS (2001), Iddss (1995)
The calculated bedrock accelerations should only be considered as reasonable estimates.
Many factors (soil conditions, orientation to the fault, etc.) can influence the actual ground
surface accelerations. Significant deviation from the values presented is possible due to
geotechnical and geologic variations from the typical conditions used in the empirical
correlations.
Probabilitv of Future Earthquakes - The historical records do not directly indicate either the
maximum credible earthquake or the probability of such a future event. To evaluate earthquake
probability in this region, the United States Geological Survey (USGS, 1999) has assembled a
group of researchers into the "Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities" to
estimate the probabilities of earthquakes on active faults. Potential sources were analyzed
considering fault geometry, geologic slip rates, geodetic strain rates, historic activity, and micro -
seismicity, to arrive at estimates of probabilities of earthquakes with a Moment Magnitude
greater than 6.7 by 2030.
The probability studies focus on seven "fault systems" within the Bay Area. Fault systems are
composed of different, interacting fault segments capable of producing earthquakes within the
individual segment or in combination with other segments of the same fault system. The
probabilities for the individual fault segments in the San Francisco Bay Area are presented on
Figure 3.
VA
SIGNIFICANT EARTHQUAKE ACTIVITY
SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA
REGION
Historic
Median Peak
Richter
Bedrock
Fault
Magnitude
Year
Distance
Acceleration
San Andreas
8.3
1906
29 km
0.27 g
Hayward
6.8
1836
35 km
0.11 g
San Andreas
7.0
1838
42 km
0.08 g
Rodgers Creek
6.4
1892
67 km
0.04 g
Hayward
6.8
1868
48 km
0.06 g
References: Sources: USGS (2001), Iddss (1995)
The calculated bedrock accelerations should only be considered as reasonable estimates.
Many factors (soil conditions, orientation to the fault, etc.) can influence the actual ground
surface accelerations. Significant deviation from the values presented is possible due to
geotechnical and geologic variations from the typical conditions used in the empirical
correlations.
Probabilitv of Future Earthquakes - The historical records do not directly indicate either the
maximum credible earthquake or the probability of such a future event. To evaluate earthquake
probability in this region, the United States Geological Survey (USGS, 1999) has assembled a
group of researchers into the "Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities" to
estimate the probabilities of earthquakes on active faults. Potential sources were analyzed
considering fault geometry, geologic slip rates, geodetic strain rates, historic activity, and micro -
seismicity, to arrive at estimates of probabilities of earthquakes with a Moment Magnitude
greater than 6.7 by 2030.
The probability studies focus on seven "fault systems" within the Bay Area. Fault systems are
composed of different, interacting fault segments capable of producing earthquakes within the
individual segment or in combination with other segments of the same fault system. The
probabilities for the individual fault segments in the San Francisco Bay Area are presented on
Figure 3.
VA
In addition to the seven fault systems, the studies included probabilities of "background
earthquakes." These earthquakes are not associated with the identified fault systems and may
occur on lesser faults (i.e., West Napa) or previously unknown faults (i.e., the 1989 Loma Prieta
and 1994 Northridge earthquakes). When the probabilities on all seven fault systems and the
background earthquakes are combined mathematically, there is a 70 percent chance for a
magnitude 6.7 or larger earthquake to occur in the Bay Area by the year 2030. Smaller
earthquakes (between magnitudes 6.0 and 6.7), capable of considerable damage depending on
proximity to urban areas, have about an 80 percent chance of occurring in the Bay Area by
2030 (USGS, 1999).
Additional studies by the USGS regarding the probability of large earthquakes in the Bay Area
are ongoing. These current evaluations include data from additional active faults and updated
geological data.
F. Geotechnical Exploration and Subsurface Conditions
Eight test borings were excavated at the site on March 19, 2002 using portable drilling equipment.
The boring locations are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. The soils encountered were logged
and samples were obtained for laboratory testing. The test borings were backfilled with soil the
same day they were excavated. The subsurface exploration program is discussed in more detail
in Appendix A. A Soil Classification Chart, Rock Classification Chart and Boring Logs are
presented on Figures A-1 through A-10 of the Appendix.
Borings 1 and 2 were excavated within Lot 22A to provide information for the planned main
residence. Borings 3 through 4 were excavated on opposite sides of the drainage course
between Lots 22A and 21A to provide information for the planned bridge crossing. Borings 5
and 8 were excavated along the lower portion of the driveway alignment to provide information
for planned retaining walls. Boring 6 and 7 were excavated within Lot 21A to provide
information for the planned second residence.
The subsurface exploration generally confirms the geologic mapping. The soils encountered in
the borings generally are shallow and consist of stiff silty and sandy clays that typically range
11
from 1 to 4 feet in thickness. The soils are underlain by variably weathered and fractured to
sheared Franciscan Complex bedrock as described above.
G. Laboratory Testing
Laboratory testing of both disturbed and relatively undisturbed samples from the test borings
includes moisture content and dry density. The results of the in-place moisture and density tests
are presented on the boring logs. The laboratory testing program is described in detail in
Appendix A.
H. Groundwater
Neither groundwater nor flowing springs were observed in our borings, which were backfilled the
day they were excavated. The "ridge" type topography in the vicinity of the proposed residences
should limit the presence of groundwater in relatively shallow excavations. However,
groundwater levels will likely fluctuate throughout the year and there is some potential for
perched water and seepage at the soil/rock interface during or after periods of intense rainfall.
IV. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS EVALUATION
A. Summary
The principal geologic hazards that could potentially affect the site are ground shaking,
landsliding, shallow soil creep, erosion and debris flow. These and other geologic hazards that
are less likely such as lurching and ground cracking, liquefaction, expansive soils, settlement,
and flooding are described below. Geologic hazards, their impacts and recommended
mitigation measures are discussed below.
B. Fault Surface Rupture
The proposed development area is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone'.
We therefore judge the potential for fault surface rupture in the development area to be low.
No mitigation measures are required for structures in the development area.
C. Seismic Shakino
The site will likely experience seismic ground shaking similar to other areas in the seismically
active Bay Area. The intensity of ground shaking will depend on the characteristics of the
causative fault, distance from the fault, the earthquake magnitude and duration, and site-
specific geologic conditions. Estimates of peak ground accelerations are based on either
deterministic or probabilistic methods.
Deterministic methods use empirical relations developed for rock sites (Abrahamson & Silva,
1997) to provide approximate estimates of median peak ground accelerations. A summary of the
active faults that could affect the subdivision, their maximum credible magnitude, closest distance
to the site, and probable peak ground accelerations are summarized in Table B.
The Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act prohibits placing most structures for human occupancy
across traces of active faults. "these fault zones are shown on maps issued by the Department of
Conservation's Division of Mines and Geology.
10
TABLE B
ESTIMATED PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION
FOR PRINCIPAL ACTIVE FAULTS
LEE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA
(1) Determined from attenuation relationship by Abrahamson & Silva (1997) for rock sites.
Reference: USGS (1999), Caltrans (1996)
The calculated bedrock accelerations should only be considered as reasonable estimates. Many
factors (soil conditions, orientation to the fault, etc.) can influence the actual ground surface
accelerations.
The potential for strong seismic shaking at the project site is high. Due to their close proximity,
the San Andreas, Hayward and Rodgers Creek faults present the highest potential for severe
ground shaking. The significant adverse impact associated with strong seismic shaking is
potential damage to structures and improvements.
Seismic Shaking Mitigation Measures — Minimum mitigation measures should include designing
the improvements and structures in accordance with the most recent (1997) version of the
Uniform Building Code. Recommended UBC seismic coefficients and seismic design criteria
are provided in Section V of this report.
D. Lurching and Ground Cracking
Lurching and associated ground cracking can occur during strong ground shaking. Ground
cracking generally occurs along the tops of slopes where stiff soils are underlain by soft
deposits or along steep channel banks. Since there are some relatively steep banks along the
11
Moment Magnitude
Closest Estimated
Median
for Characteristic
Distance
Peak Ground
Fault
Earthquake
(kilometers)
Acceleration (g)(')
San Andreas
7.9
14
0.36
Hayward
7.1
16
0.25
Rodgers Creek
7.0
23
0.19
San Gregorio
7.3
19
0.23
West Napa
6.5
35
0.09
(1) Determined from attenuation relationship by Abrahamson & Silva (1997) for rock sites.
Reference: USGS (1999), Caltrans (1996)
The calculated bedrock accelerations should only be considered as reasonable estimates. Many
factors (soil conditions, orientation to the fault, etc.) can influence the actual ground surface
accelerations.
The potential for strong seismic shaking at the project site is high. Due to their close proximity,
the San Andreas, Hayward and Rodgers Creek faults present the highest potential for severe
ground shaking. The significant adverse impact associated with strong seismic shaking is
potential damage to structures and improvements.
Seismic Shaking Mitigation Measures — Minimum mitigation measures should include designing
the improvements and structures in accordance with the most recent (1997) version of the
Uniform Building Code. Recommended UBC seismic coefficients and seismic design criteria
are provided in Section V of this report.
D. Lurching and Ground Cracking
Lurching and associated ground cracking can occur during strong ground shaking. Ground
cracking generally occurs along the tops of slopes where stiff soils are underlain by soft
deposits or along steep channel banks. Since there are some relatively steep banks along the
11
seasonal drainage course and along the existing Makin Grade road cut, there is some (small)
potential for ground cracking near the top of the banks.
Mitigation measures include structure setbacks from the drainage course and top of road cuts.
Assuming that the proposed building areas will remain setback at least 20 -feet away from these
areas as indicated by the conceptual plan, this hazard should not affect the structures and no
additional mitigation is required.
E. Liquefaction Potential and Related Impacts
Liquefaction refers to the sudden, temporary loss of soil strength during strong ground shaking.
This phenomenon can occur where there are saturated, loose, granular (sandy) deposits
subjected to seismic shaking. Liquefaction -related phenomena include seismically induced
settlement, flow failure, and lateral spreading. Based on the results of our test borings, we do
not anticipate liquefiable soils at the site.
No liquefaction mitigation measures are necessary.
F. Erosion
Sandy soils on moderate slopes or clayey soils on steep slopes are susceptible to erosion when
exposed to concentrated surface water flows. Within the proposed lot areas, the site soils are
relatively clayey, the slopes are relatively steep, and accelerated erosion is currently occurring
along the existing road cut.
Mitigation measures include the project Civil Engineer designing a site drainage system to
collect surface water into a tight pipe storm drain system and discharge water at an appropriate
location. Re-establishing vegetation on disturbed slopes will also be required to minimize
erosion.
G. Expansive Soils
Clays and silts of moderate to high plasticity, when located near the ground surface, can exhibit
expansive characteristics (shrink -swell behavior) that can be detrimental to structures and
flatwork during periods of fluctuating soil moisture content. Field identification of site soils
indicates low expansion potential.
12
No mitigation measures are anticipated for expansive soils.
H. Settlement
Soils encountered during our exploration were generally soft to medium stiff. Building
foundations should either bear directly on firm soil/weathered rock or the softer surficial soils
should be removed during grading and replaced with compacted fill. Providing this, and that
building foundations are designed in accordance with the recommended criteria provided in
Section V of this report, settlement should not be a hazard at the site.
No special mitigation measures are required. Foundations should be designed in accordance
with Section V.
I. Floodinq
The site is not shown to be within the FEMA 100 -year flood zone. The project Civil Engineer is
responsible for site drainage and should evaluate local flooding potential and provide
appropriate mitigation.
Flooding Mitigation Measures - The project Civil Engineer should evaluate site drainage and
localized flooding potential and provide appropriate mitigation measures.
J. Slone Stability
The proposed building areas consist of moderate to steeply sloping topography with no
observed indications of slope instability. However, due to the soft condition of the shallow
surficial soils, creep forces may exist. As stated previously, landsliding was observed along the
upslope side of the Makin Grade road cut. Due to their distance from the building areas, the
slides do not appear to pose a constraint to the project.
Slope Stability Mitigation Measures — Mitigation measures include design of cut and fill slopes
and other aspects of site grading in the development area as recommended in Section V.
Careful control of site drainage and constructing appropriately designed retaining walls will also
be required for site development. During grading, the minor landslides along the upslope side
of the existing road should be excavated and replaced with compacted fill and possibly
13
subsurface drainage in accordance with the cut and fill slope recommendations provided in
Section V of this report. Disturbance of vegetation on steeply sloped hillsides outside the
building area should be minimized to reduce the risk of shallow stuffing and landsliding during
wetter periods of the year.
K. Debris Flow
As stated previously, a mass of landslide debris is located at the headwater of the drainage
course running between the two lots. This area is within the open space located directly upslope
to the west of the property and adjacent to Upper Toyon Drive. A smaller debris mass on the
property and within the drainage course is located about one hundred feet upslope of the existing
Makin Grade road. The potential for these debris masses to mobilize and inundate planned
improvements as well as the adjacent property directly below is not known. However, we feel
there is sufficient risk to warrant mitigation.
Debris Flow Mitigation Measures — We recommend a debris flow catchment basin be constructed
on the property within the drainage course to reduce the risk of a large debris flow inundating the
planned improvements in this area and the property directly below it. We suggest the current
concept of spanning the drainage course with a bridge be reconsidered. Utilizing fill generated
from onsite excavations, a suitably large catchment dam could be created on which the new
driveway could be built. The catchment dam should be constructed to create a catchment basin of
at least 300 cubic yards in volume to provide adequate capacity for potential debris flows. The
project Civil Engineer should provide for drainage of storm runoff that collects within the catchment
basin. The side slopes of the catchment dam should be constructed at a maximum inclination of
2:1. Alternatively, a reinforced earth wall that uses geogrid inclusions within compacted soil and
modular concrete block facing can be utilized to steepen these side slopes if necessary.
Reinforced earth walls are discussed in Section V of this report.
14
V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Conclusions
Based on our investigation and previous experience with similar sites and projects, we conclude
that the site is suitable for the planned development. The primary geotechnical concerns are
uniform foundation support on the site bedrock, appropriate design to resist strong seismic
ground shaking and minimizing the debris flow hazard. In addition, isolated areas of sloughing
cut slopes should be remediated. Design recommendations for these and other geotechnical
issues are provided below.
B. Seismic Desian
The site is underlain by relatively shallow deposits of soils over variable bedrock, therefore,
seismic ground motions at the site may be slightly attenuated or amplified from the ground motions
experienced in adjacent bedrock areas. The magnitude and character of these ground motions
will depend on the particular earthquake and the site response characteristics. Based on the
interpreted subsurface conditions, we recommend the following UBC (1997) coefficients for
calculating the design base shear of the new buildings:
TABLE C
1997 UBC FACTORS
LEE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA
Seismic Zone Factor:
Seismic Source Type:
Soil Profile Type:
Seismic Coefficients:
Near Source Seismic Factors:
Z = 0.40
Type A
Sc — Very Dense Soil & Soft Rock
CA = 0.40, Cv = 0.57
NA = 1.0, Nv = 1.02
The effects of earthquake shaking (i.e. protection of life safety) can be mitigated by close
adherence to the seismic provisions of the current edition of the UBC. However, some building
damage may still occur during strong ground shaking.
C. Site Grading
1. Site Preparation. Site preparation should include removing grass, weeds and their root
crowns from the ground surface in the areas to be graded. Any rubbish encountered should also
15
be removed. Trees that will be removed (in structural areas) must also include removal of stumps
and roots larger than 4 inches in diameter. Excavated areas (i.e., excavations for stump removal)
should be restored with properly moisture conditioned and compacted fill as described in the
following sections. Debris and vegetation strippings will not be suitable for structural fill and should
be removed from the site. Alternatively, vegetation scrapings may be used in landscape areas.
Where fills are planned, the subgrade surface should be moisture conditioned to near the optimum
moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D-1557).
Relative compaction, maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of fill materials should
be determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method D 1557, "Moisture -Density Relations of
Soils and Soil -Aggregate Mixtures Using a 10-1b. Rammer and 18 -in. Drop."
2. Fill Materials. The on-site materials appear suitable for use as compacted fill. All fill
material must meet the criteria presented in Table D.
3. Imported Fill. If imported fill is used to raise building site grades or driveways, we
recommend using non -expansive materials spread uniformly and continuously over the entire
building pad. Imported fill shall be free of organic matter, and conform to the requirements in
Table D.
TABLE D
FILL GRADATION LIMITS
LEE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
SAN RAFAEL. CALIFORNIA
Particle Percent Finer
Size by Dry Weight
4 inch 100
No. 4 sieve 20-100
No. 200 sieve 0-50
Restrictions: Liquid Limit < 40, Plasticity Index < 20, R -value >_ 40
4. Compaction. All on-site and imported fill and backfill should be conditioned to near
optimum moisture content. Properly moisture conditioned and cured materials should
subsequently be placed in loose horizontal lifts of 8 inches thick or less, and uniformly compacted
to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction to produce a firm non -yielding surface.
16
5. Cut and Fill Slope Construction. The shallow landsliding of steep slopes noted in our
geologic reconnaissance indicates that new cut slopes into highly weathered rock should be
inclined at a maximum of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) and existing cut slopes should be trimmed
back to 2:1. If during construction excavations expose hard rock, as determined by the project
Geotechnical Engineer, cuts can be made with a maximum inclination of 1:1. Additionally, the top
of cut and fill slopes should be rounded to improve stability.
If sloping grades are to be modified by placing fill, benching into firm materials and subdrainage
will be required. Maximum inclination of fill slopes should be 2:1. A typical detail for hillside fills is
included on Figure 4. Typical details for subsurface drainage are included on Figure 5. The
keyway depths, benching and need for and location of subdrains should be determined during
construction by the project Geotechnical Engineer.
D. Site Drainaqe
Although the site currently includes slopes that will drain, planned grading could result in adverse
drainage patterns causing water to pond around the buildings. Careful consideration should be
given to design of finished grades at the site. We recommend that the building areas be raised
slightly and that the adjoining landscaped areas be sloped downward at least 0.25 feet for 5 feet (5
percent) from the perimeter of building foundations. Where hard surfaces, such as concrete or
asphalt adjoin foundations, slope these surfaces at least 0.10 feet in the first 5 feet (2 percent).
Roof gutter downspouts may discharge onto the pavements, but should not discharge onto any
landscaped areas. Area drains should be provided for landscape planters adjacent to buildings
and parking areas and downspouts should discharge into a tight pipe collection system. In
addition, site improvements should be protected from surface runoff from higher elevations by
concrete lined V -ditches (per Marin County Standard Drawing No. 260, Type "A").
Site drainage should be discharged away from the building area and outlets should be designed to
reduce erosion of the soils immediately downslope. Site drainage improvements should be
connected into the storm drainage system, or tight pipes that discharge in the seasonal drainage
course.
E. Crawlspace and Foundation Drainaqe
17
Structures built on sloping pads have the potential to accumulate moisture within their
crawlspaces due to seepage of subsurface water. This seepage is typically due to natural
groundwater migration or excessive irrigation of areas on the upslope side of the structure. A
wet crawlspace can lead to mold growth that may be hazardous to the health of the occupants.
Also, the cost to remediate a wet crawlspace is generally much more than the cost of providing
adequate crawlspace drainage during construction. With this in mind, we recommend the
following details be included in the site drainage plan.
To minimize the likelihood of subsurface water entering the crawl space, a foundation drain
should be constructed along the upslope perimeter of the structure and elsewhere along the
perimeter foundation where landscape irrigation is planned. A typical foundation drain detail is
shown on Figure 6. Additionally, the crawlspace surface should be sloped at least 2 percent to
an area drain or drains. The area drain should connect into the storm drainage system, or tight
pipes that discharge in the seasonal drainage course. Drain inlets and outlets should have locking
grates to prevent small animals from entering the crawlspace. For foundation systems that utilize
a grid of continuous interior grade beams, a PVC pipe sleeve through the grade beam should be
installed adjacent to low points to allow water to exit. A typical crawlspace drainage plan for a
grid foundation system is shown on Figure 7. The sloping crawlspace and PVC sleeves should
direct water to a drain inlet or inlets within the crawlspace. A layer of black visqueen should
cover all exposed soil surfaces. All seams and edges should be sealed with waterproof
adhesive tape.
It is difficult to predict the location or quantity of subsurface seepage that may be present during
the wetter periods of the year. Therefore, we recommend that MPEG inspect the crawlspace of
the structure during the first rainy season to determine whether additional moisture control
measures are required. These measures typically include a concrete slab poured on the
crawlspace ground surface, shallow french drains through areas of excessive seepage, lights,
fans or increasing the number of vents to reduce the ambient moisture content within the
crawlspace.
F. Foundation Recommendations
The surface soils encountered by our exploration are typically soft to medium stiff. The underlying
bedrock has variable weathering and is moderately hard to very hard. Based on these soil and
ill
rock conditions and the relatively light foundation loads anticipated from one and two-story wood -
framed structures, shallow spread footings are judged to be an appropriate foundation type for the
majority of the project. Drilled piers should be used if structures extend into the drainage course
shown on Figure 2, or if deepening of footings on slopes per Table E is deemed unacceptable.
In order to reduce the potential for differential settlements, if portions of a structure require drilled
piers, the entire structure should be founded on piers. Alternatively, localized deepening of
shallow foundations may be required so that foundation support is obtained from relatively similar
materials.
Shallow spread footings should be bottomed on rock, and drilled piers should derive support from
soil and bedrock, in accordance with Table E.
19
TABLE E
FOUNDATION DESIGN CRITERIA
SHALLOW SPREAD FOOTINGS AND DRILLED PIERS
LEE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
SAN RAFAEL. CALIFORNIA
Shallow Footings:
Minimum width ):
Minimum embedment depths (below lowest adjacent grade) (2):
Allowable bearing pressure:
Dead plus live loads:
Total design loads (includes wind and seismic):
Base friction coefficient:
Lateral Passive Resistance (2,3,4.7)
Compacted Fill or Stiff Soils
Weathered or Hard Rock
Drilled Piers:
Minimum diameter:
Skin Friction (5)
Compacted Fill or Stiff Soils
Weathered or Hard Rock
Minimum penetration:
Lateral Passive Resistance (3.4,6.7)
Compacted Fill or Stiff Soils
Weathered or Hard Rock
12 inches
18 inches
2,500 psf
3,000 psf
0.35
Level
2:1 slope
400 pcf
300 pcf
500 pcf
400 pcf
16 inches
500 psf
800 psf
5 feet into
rock
Level
2:1 slope
400 pcf 300pcf
500 pcf 400pcf
(1) Load all shallow foundations to similar bearing pressures, i.e. size footing widths to design
loads rather than a uniform foundation width.
(2) For sloping terrain, maintain at least 7 feet horizontal distance from base of foundation to
face of slope.
(3) Ignore upper 12 -inches of passive support for footings, upper 36 -inches for piers
(4) Equivalent Fluid Pressure, not to exceed 3000 psf.
(5) May increase design values by 1/3 for total design loads including seismic.
(6) Apply values over effective width of 2 pier diameters.
(7) Interpolate values for intermediate slopes.
G. Retaininq Wall Desiqn
The retaining walls for garage pads and the upper portions of the new driveway can be
constructed using several different construction methods. One method of construction is a
oil]
reinforced earth wall that utilizes geogrid inclusions within compacted soil and modular concrete
block facing. A typical reinforced earth wall design is shown on Figure 8. Altematively, a
conventional concrete wall supported with a spread footing, drilled piers or a soldier pile retaining
wall could be used. The retaining wall along the downslope side of the lower portion of the
driveway (up to the first lot entrance) should be supported on drilled piers.
The wall foundations should be designed in accordance with Table E. The majority of retaining
walls at the site can be supported on spread footings. Drilled piers should be used if deepening
of footings on slopes per Table E is deemed unacceptable. Additional design criteria for
retaining walls are included in Table F:
TABLE F
RETAINING WALL DESIGN CRITERIA
LEE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA
Foundation Design Per Shallow Footings, Table E
Lateral Active Pressure 1,2:
Level Backfill
40 pcf
2:1 Sloping Backfill
55 pcf
Lateral "At -rest" pressures 2,3:
Level Backfill
50 pcf
2:1 Sloping Backfill
70 pcf
Creep Surcharge':
20 pcf
Earthquake Surcharge 4'5:
15 x H,, psf
Traffic Surcharge 5,6:
50 psf
(1) Equivalent Fluid Pressure, assumes small rotation can occur at the top of the wall.
(2) Interpolate active pressure for intermediate slopes.
(3) Assumes rotation cannot occur at the top of the wall and level backfill
(4) Ha = exposed wall height in feet, Design for Factor of Safety > 1.0
(5) Uniform Rectangular Pressure Distribution.
(6) 'Apply to upper 4 feet of walls supporting driveway/parking areas.
(7) For upslope retaining walls along driveway and garage pads, apply to upper 3 -feet
of wall
Wall drainage should be collected in a 4 -inch, perforated, Schedule 40 PVC drain line placed at
the base of the wall as shown on Figure 9. Seepage collected in the drain line should be
conveyed in a closed pipe to a suitable discharge outlet well away from the retaining wall
21
foundation. To maintain the wall drainage system, a clean-out must be provided for the perforated
pipe at the upstream end. Sweep fittings should be used at all major changes in direction.
H. Concrete Slabs
Exterior concrete walkway slabs should be underlain with 4 inches or more of Class 2 Aggregate
Base (Caltrans, 1999) over a prepared subgrade that was previously discussed. The aggregate
base should be moisture conditioned and compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction.
Reinforced concrete slabs -on -grade are also judged to be appropriate for garages and driveways.
We recommend that concrete slabs have a minimum thickness of 4 inches and be reinforced with
steel reinforcing bars or wire mesh as specified by the Structural Engineer. We recommend crack
control joints no farther than 6 feet apart in both directions and that the reinforcing bars, extend
through the control joints. For improved performance, slabs may be thickened to 5 -inches.
Concrete slabs for garages and driveways should be underlain by at least 4 -inches of Class 2
Aggregate Base compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction over a properly prepared
subgrade.
I. Utilitv Trench Excavations and Backfill
Excavations for utilities will likely be in weathered or hard sandstone rock at depths greater than
about 3 feet. Trench excavations having a depth of 5 feet or more must be excavated and shored
in accordance with OSHA regulations. Pursuant to OSHA classifications, on-site soils are a Type
B.
Bedding materials for utility pipes should be well -graded sand with 90 to 100 percent of particles
passing the No. 4 sieve and no more than 5 percent finer than the No. 200 sieve. Provide the
minimum bedding beneath the pipe in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendation,
typically 3 to 6 inches. Trench backfill may consist of on-site soils, moisture conditioned and
placed in thin lifts and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. Use equipment and
methods that are suitable for work in confined areas without damaging utility conduits.
J. Drivewav Subprade Preparation and Preliminary Pavement Section
Site grading for the driveway should be performed as described in Section V -C, including benching
and subsurface drainage where driveways will be placed on fill. Table G presents several
preliminary pavement sections based on an assumed R -value of 35.
M
TABLE G
PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT SECTIONS
LEE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA
Asphalt Concrete Class 2 Aggregate Base
Traffic Index (inches) inches
4.0 2.5 5.0
4.5 2.5 6.0
5.0 3.0 5.0
5.5 3.0 6.0
The R -value of pavement subgrade should be confirmed during construction and when the
subgrade soils are exposed in the roadway areas. If site grading operations (either cut or fill)
result in pavement areas having a subgrade material significantly different than the existing near -
surface soil, we should perform R -value testing to determine if the recommended pavement
sections will be appropriate.
The upper 6 inches of subgrade in pavement areas must be scarified, moisture conditioned to
near the optimum water content, and then compacted to a minimum 95 percent relative
compaction. The compacted surface must also be non -yielding when proof -rolled with heavy
construction equipment.
The base rock should consist of compacted Class 2 Aggregate Base (Caltrans, 1999) compacted
to achieve at least 95 percent relative compaction and a non -yielding surface when proof -rolled
with heavy construction equipment.
23
VI. PLAN REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
We must review the grading plans and specifications for site development and foundation design
when they are nearing completion to confirm that the intent of our recommendations has been
understood and incorporated, and to provide supplemental recommendations if needed.
During construction, we must inspect site preparation and foundation excavations. We must verify
subgrade preparation and compaction, proper moisture conditioning of soils, and fill placement
and compaction. We should also inspect pavement subgrade preparation and placement and
compaction of base rock materials.
24
LIST OF REFERENCES
American Society for Testing and Materials; 2000 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 4,
Construction, Volume 04.08, Soil and Rock; Dimension Stone; Geosynthetics, ASTM,
Philadelphia, 1999.
Blake Jr., M.C., Bartow, J.A., Frizzell, Jr., V.A., Schlocker, J., Sorg, D., Wentworth, C.M., and
Wright, R.H., Preliminary Geoloaic Map of Marin and San Francisco Counties and Parts of
Alameda, Contra Cost and Sonoma Counties, California: U.S. Geologically Survey.
Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF574, 1974.
California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Fault Activitv of California
and Adiacent Areas. Map No. 6, 1994.
California Department of Transportation, Caltrans Standard Specifications, 1999.
Donald Herzog & Associates, Slope Stabilitv Assessment and Mitigations. Oakwood Residential
Villaqe, San Rafael. California, May 27, 1983.
Donald Herzog & Associates, Geologic Assessment. Open Space at South End. Oakwood
Subdivision, San Rafael. California, March 8, 1984.
Geoengineering, Inc., Geotechnical Assessment, Proposed Extension of Greenwood Avenue and
Adioinina UDSIoDe Residential Building Sites. Oakwood Subdivision. Unit 2. San Rafael. California,
March 23, 1987.
Geoengineering, Inc., Supplemental Recommendations and Discussions. Oakwood Subdivision.,
Unit 2, on Makin Way (Projected) off Greenwood Avenue Extension, San Rafael, California, June
22, 1987.
Hart, E. W. and Bryant, A.B. Fault Rupture Hazards Zones in California, Special Publication 42,
California Division of Mines and Geology, Revised 1997.
Mualchin, Lalliana, A Technical Report to Accompanv the Caltrans California Seismic Hazard Map
1996 (Based on Maximum Credible Earthquakes), California Department of Transportation, July
1996.
Rice, S.J., et al., Open File Report 76-2. Geoloqv for Planning: Central and Southwest Marin
Countv. California, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, 1976.
Uniform Buildina Code, 1997 Ed., International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier,
California, p. 2-30.
U.S. Geological Survey, "Database of Potential Sources for Earthquakes Larger than Magnitude 6
in Northern California," The Working Group on Northern California Earthquake Potential, Open File
Report 96-705, 1996.
U.S. Geological Survey, "Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region, 2000 to 2030
A Summary of Findings," The Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, Open File
25
Report 99-517, 1999.
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
The following stereo -paired photographs from Pacific Aerial Surveys were reviewed;
AV 6540-124, 59, 1:12,000, 5/3/00
AV 2140-5,19, 1:12,000, 5/3/82
AV 41-6,25, 1:15,000, 11/8/50
26
-MA
m
¢7p.
(PROPOSED
'�
\`
CROSSM
LOT 21 A
PARCEL MAP 587-11
24 PARCEL MAPS 29
'?[ i' ff C?
LOT 22 A t OUS
' .-moi '� H F R
HE WE
PARCEL MAP S87-11 €
24 PARCEL MAPS 29
P.
HOUSE SITE �. �V,
k.
t �
Y"
PROPOSED ;=:%a•" . .
AUGAPMENT
. • ; . 4.. 'p;=._^„' . ; : Vic% / ,.
.t .
MLEGEND
,AICW GPASIE � _,
ALE UMENT
LANDSLIDE G
BORING BY SCALE
MPEG ,
0 20 40 80 FEET
REFERENCE: FMM, LANDS OF VWCE LEE, TOPOGRAf W MAP, JANUARY 2WZ
' 317E PLAN
Lee Property Development
San Rafael, Califomia
ta�:c:3.
6.s�z.oi 5n3t02 ar. Figure
PACIPIC OCE
R'
y,
VV k.Vu'LSb
'• l'
UBC DES6RIe:PON
— — — "A"
CAPABLE OF LARGE
`
��,,
SONOMA
GOUNIY
PACIPIC OCE
R'
y,
',...-..,. .,._
FAULT TYPE
UBC DES6RIe:PON
— — — "A"
CAPABLE OF LARGE
MAGNITUDE EARTHQUAKES
AND
HIGH RATE OF SEISMIC ACTIVITY
sp-
CAPABLE OF LARGE
MAGNITUDE EARTHQUAKES
OR
HIGH RATE OF SEISMIC ACTIVITY
iK
LEGEND U,1
SEISMIC
SOURCE
',...-..,. .,._
FAULT TYPE
UBC DES6RIe:PON
— — — "A"
CAPABLE OF LARGE
MAGNITUDE EARTHQUAKES
AND
HIGH RATE OF SEISMIC ACTIVITY
••••.•••••• "B"
CAPABLE OF LARGE
MAGNITUDE EARTHQUAKES
OR
HIGH RATE OF SEISMIC ACTIVITY
PROBABILISTIC LEGEND
(0 %) - PROBABILITY OF MAGNITUDE 6.7 OR
GREATER EARTHQUAKE, 2000 TO 2030
COMBINED FAULT SYSTEM PROBABILITIES
SAN ANDREAS = 21 %
HAYWARD-RODGERS CREEK = 32%
CALAVERAS = 10%
01-
Olp
i _--o R�' ;
�I1p
CTRA O^sT .i
COU + 'e
ALAMEOA
COUNTY
Yy� `atj
SAN MATED i+ ';'r •� +��
COUNrY E
SANTA CLARAy
COUNTY
` �' � •s�iO'FY , ��
` SANTA CRUZ + '••ti T �,'r.
COUNTY T•�4 •.y cera. : J 1
` 01. 02
NOTES:
GV GREAT VALLEY
THRUST FAULT APPROXIMATE SCALE
J
ALL COUNTIES SHOWN ON MAP 0 10 20 40 M4e0
ARE IN SEISMIC ZONE 4 1
REFERENCES: 0 is 30 MKOMMRS
1) MAPS OF KNOWN ACTIVE FAULT NEAR -SOURCE ZONES IN CALIFORNIA CDMG/SEAOCIICBO, FEBRUARY 1998
2 DATABASE OF POTENTIAL SOURCES FOR EARTHQUAKES LARGER THAW MAG. 6 IN N, CALIFORNIA, USGS OFR 96.705,1996
3) EARTHQUAKE PROBABILITIES IN THE S.F. BAY REGION, 2000 - 2030, USGS OFR 99-517,1999
COPYRIGHT 2001. MO.LER PACIFIC ENGINEERING GROUP (REV. 000]
FILE: ruA
iaii
Nil ACTIVE FAULT MAP
P Lee Propery Development 3
San Rafael, California
N9 �' 912.01 Date 5123102 BpP`� j w1 Figure
ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE
WEAK TOPSOILS
CONVEY RUNOFF TO
SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
SLOPE
TO DRAIN �.
COMPACTED
LL
90o MIN R.C..
i_
10 FEET KEYWAY
WIDTH, U.O.S.
,Y
SUBDRAIN
INTERMEDIATE STEP(S)
INTO FIRM SOIL OR ROCK
SUBDRAINS WHERE NEEDED
KEYWAY AND SU B DRAI N
FIRM SOILS OR ROCK
NOTES:
(1) NUMBER OF BENCHES AND WIDTH(S) MAY VARY
(2) R.C. = RELATIVE COMPACTION
(3) U.O.S. = UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
TYPICAL HILLSIDE FILL CONSTRUCTION
(NO SCALE)
FILE ST"OsAft
COPYFt*W 1 WO, MILLER PACIFIC ENWNEERMIO OR"
TYPICAL HILLSIDE FILL CONSTRUCTION
Lee Property Development
San Rafael, California
N' 912o..01 Data 5/23/02 App6noved /01
0
Figure
TIGHT PIPE RISER AND CAPPED CLEAN OUT
COMPACTED FILL BUTTRESS
90% MINIMUM R.C.
+++++� 5 FEET
+ + U.O.S.
WEAK SOILS �
1AftFIRM
-----------OILS OR 2 IN. MINIMUM
BEDROCK
12 IN. MIN.
U.O.S.
FILTER FABRIC
ENVELOPE
'ERMEABLE
AATERIAL
PERFORATED
PI PE
NOTES:
(1.) PIPE TO BE 4 -IN. DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PVC. PERFORATIONS DOWN,
S = 0.02 MIN., WITH TIGHT PIPE TO GRAVITY DISCHARGE.
(2.) FILTER FABRIC TO BE MIRAFI 140N OR EQUIVALENT.
(3.) PERMEABLE MATERIAL TO BE CALTRANS CLASS 1A OR 1 B.
(4.) R.C. = RELATIVE COMPACTION, ASTM 0-1557.
(5.) USE SWEEPS FOR ALL SUBDRAIN BENDS/ELBOWS.
(6.) U.O.S. = UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
TYPICAL SUBDRAIN DETAIL FOR
BUTTRESS KEYWAYS AND BENCHES
(NO SCALE)
Project
NO,
TYPICAL SUBDRAIN DETAIL FOR
BUTTRESS KEYWAY AND BENCHES
Lee Property Development
San Rafael, California
912.01 °®'� 5/23/02 � ea '
J
Figure
LIVING SPACE
CRAWL SPACE
I
18 -IN. MIN.
GRADE
BEAM
FOOTING
6 -IN. MIN. CLEARANCE
TOPSOIL
--- FILTER FABRIC
PEA GRAVEL
- SLOPE 0.2 FT. IN 5 FT.
6 -IN. t
;9' I
0
2 -IN. MINIMUM
__1-34N. DIA. RIGID
PERF, PVC PIPE
I 1 -IN.
2 -IN. CLEAR EACH SIDE
FLOW LINE TO BE 0.1 FT,
BELOW INTERIOR SUBGRADE
AT UPPER END OF FOUNDATIO
DRAIN RUN. SLOPE = 0.02 (2%)
NOTES:
(1.) DO NOT CONNECT DOWNSPOUT LEADER TO FOUNDATION DRAIN
(2.) PROVIDE CLEAN OUTS WHERE SPECIFIED BY DESIGNER
(3.) DISCHARGE THRU RIGID, NON -PERFORATED PIPE, SLOPE 0.02 (2%)
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
TYPICAL FOUNDATION DRAIN DETAIL
(NO SCALE)
SM031
COPYRIGHT MILLER PACIFlC EM618�RING GROUP
i�
ENU'INE1=i2iI�iG GjiC3uf?
Project 912.01
NG.
TYPICAL FOUNDATION DRAIN DETAIL
Lee Property Development
San Rafael, California
Date 5/23/02 By.. G,led I
on
•
Figure
TYPICAL GRADE
BEAM FOUNDATION UPSLOPE FOUNDATION
DRAIN
'�-------------------------I---------------------p
w,
o�
o�
z
a
0
fA ■
r;
PVC SLEEVE
THROUGH
GRADE BEAM
fll
DRAIN INLET
& GRATE
a
rLa+a
1
SITE STORM
DRAIN SYSTEM
TYPICAL CRAWLSPACE DRAINAGE PLAN
TYPICAL CRAWLSPACE DRAINAGE PLAN
Lee Property Development 7
RPI ER 'Roup: San Rafael, California
Npr*c' 912.01 Dale 5/23/02 Approved j Figure
UTILITY TRENCHES
COMPACTED _.---------
FILL
SEGMENTAL
REINFORCING'--
GEOGRIDS BLOCK
FACING
SUBDRAIN — --- -.%
(IF REQUIRED) -"--""- \
AGGREGATE BASE
ILLUSTRATIVE SECTION
REINFORCED EARTH WALL FOR ROADWAY
(NO SCALE)
STD -042
COPYRIGHT 2002, MILLER I'MVIC ENGINEERING CROUP
MIN+��r3�� :,
Project
No.
ILLUSTRATIVE SECTION
REINFORCED EARTH WALL FOR ROADWAY 8
Lee Property Development
San Rafael, California
912.01 oats 5/24/02 Approved I+► Figure
SURFACE DRAIN
,
12 IN. CAP
,
,
,
SOIL BACKFILL
FILTER FABRIC
PERMEABLE MATERIAL
TEMPORARY
EXCAVATION LINE
PERFORATED DRAINAGE
WITH RISER AND
CLEAN OUT AT END
—.---' ,
a'd .. .
'
REINFORCED CONCRETE
:•
' m '
OR REINFORCED
/
MASONRY BLOCK WALL
.
d
tl°tl
.
�O°O°tl
O O
SLOPE TO DRAIN
.._ /
° .• d o d �•• •a
t •� '. d
NOTES:
(1.) PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE TO BE 4 -INCH DIA. SCHEDULE 40 PVC, U.O.S.
UPSLOPE END TO HAVE CLOSED PIPE RISER, CLEAN OUT AND CAP,
DISCHARGE TO BE CLOSED PIPE THROUGH WEEP HOLE OR FREE DRAINING END.
SLOPE DISCHARGE PIPE AT 0.02 MIN.
(2.) FILTER FABRIC TO BE MIRAFI 140N, U.O.S.
(3.) PERMEABLE MATERIAL TO BE CALTRANS CLASS 1A OR 1 B
("PEA GRAVEL" OR "3l4 ROCK") COMPACTED TO 70% RELATIVE DENSITY
MAXJMIN. INDEX UNIT WEIGHT, ASTM D-4253 AND D-4254
(4.) SOIL BACKFILL TO BE SOIL; 100% <4"; 25-50% <#200 SIEVE;
COMPACTED TO 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION, ASTM D-1557
(5.) SURFACE DRAIN TO BE CARRIED TO SAFE DRAINAGE LOCATION AT END.
DO NOT DRAIN SURFACE WATER INTO WALL BACKDRAIN OR CLEAN OUT RISER.
(6.) U,O.S. = UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
RETAINING WALL BACKDRAIN CRITERIA
FILE (qure'7.dnp
COPYRIGHT Z. MILLER PACIFIC ENGGNEERINiG GROUP
RETAINING WALL BACKDRAIN CRITERIA
Lee Property Development 9
San Rafael, Califomia
N� 912.01 Date 5/23/02 B "ff.*d Figure
APPENDIX A
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
A. Soil and Rock Classification Svstems
We have classified soils for engineering purposes in general conformance with ASTM Standard D
2487, "Field Identification and Description of Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure)" and the Unified Soil
Classification System. These systems enable geotechnical engineers to correlate soil stratigraphy
and compare physical soil properties. The soil classification system and symbols used for the test
borings and in discussions throughout this report are briefly explained on Figure A-1, Soil
Classification Chart. A Rock Classification Chart is included as Figure A-2.
B. Test Borinas and Sampling
Eight test borings were excavated on March 19, 2002 at the locations shown on the Site Plan,
Figure 2. The purpose of the borings was to examine the materials encountered and obtain
representative samples for laboratory testing. The borings were excavated with limited access
drilling equipment and 4 -inch diameter solid -stem augers. The exploration was done under the
supervision of our Field Geologist who examined and logged the soil materials encountered and
obtained samples. The subsurface conditions encountered in the borings are summarized and
presented on the Boring Logs, Figures A-3 through A-10.
The depth to groundwater, if encountered, was noted during the excavating and measured before
backfilling the borings. The borings were backfilled with soil cuttings and moderately compacted
after the exploration was completed.
To obtain representative soil samples, a standard 2 1/2 -inch inner -diameter "California sampler"
was used. This sampler has a split barrel that contains 6 -inch long thin-walled brass liner tubes
and a nose with a sharpened cutting edge. The assembled sampler was lowered into the boring
and driven 18 inches into the materials at the bottom of the boring. The blow counts, 30 -inch
drops of a 140 -Ib. hammer, required to drive the sampler each 6 inches were recorded. The total
blow count for the last 12 inches is reported on the boring logs and is used as an indication of
formation density or consistency. The sampler was then withdrawn from the boring and
disassembled. The liners containing the soil "core" were removed, examined, trimmed and sealed
with tight plastic caps to prevent moisture loss.
To obtain additional correlation data for the in-place soil and rock, we drove a Standard
Penetration Test (SPT) sampler in a similar fashion to the California Sampler as described above.
Blow counts were recorded in the filed for six-inch increments and the number of blows to drive
the sampler the final 12 inches are recorded on the boring logs.
C. Laboratory Testinq
We re-examined the samples in the laboratory to confirm field classification and suitability for
testing. We conducted laboratory tests on selected intact samples to verify field identifications and
to evaluate physical engineering properties. The following laboratory tests were conducted in
general accordance with ASTM standard test methods modified as appropriate for local conditions
and practice to provide the data needed for our engineering judgment:
• Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil, Rock, and Soil -
Aggregate Mixtures, ASTM D 2216;
• Density of Soil in Place by the Drive -Cylinder Method, ASTM D 2937;
The water content, and dry density tests are reported on the boring logs, Figures A-3 through A-
10.
The boring logs, description of soils encountered and the laboratory test data reflect conditions
only at the location of the boring or sampling at the time they were excavated or retrieved.
Conditions may differ at other locations and may change with the passage of time due to a variety
of causes including natural weathering, climate and changes in surface and subsurface drainage.
SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART
MAJOR DIVISIONS
SYMBOL
DESCRIPTION
ATTERBERG LIMITS TEST
TV
GW
SA
Well -graded gravels or gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines
UC
CLEAN GRAVEL
GP
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
Poorty-graded gravels or gravel -sand mixtures, little or no tines
O La
P200
PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE
TXUU
UNCONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED TRIAXIAL
P4
PERCENT PASSING NO. 4 SIEVE
GM
Silty gravels, graveasan"It mixtures
0 v GRAVEL
UJ
with fines
GC
Clayey gravels, gravel-sarxl-clay mixtures
SW
Well -graded sands or gravely sands, little or no fines
Lu e,
CLEAN SAND
" i
SP
?H,•#+r
Poot1 gravely sands, little or no tines
y -graded sands or ra
Q
OU
SAND
SM
Silty sands, sand -sit mixtures
with fines
SC
)}IIr
Clayey sands, sand -day mixtures
ML
Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands ordayey sifts
II
I
with slight plasticity
—� Co
SILT AND CLAY
CL
/ Inorganic Gays of low to medium plasticity, gravely days, sandy days, silty days,
-V
liquid limit X50%
lean clays
m
W ..
OL
I
�
I I
I I III
Organic silts aril organic silt -clays of low plasticity
r9 r9 y P tY
Z
�aII
N
o
MH
Inorganic sits, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sands or sots, elastic silts
OC)
lL
Z
SILT AND CLAY
o
liquid limit >50%
CH
Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat Gays
�
OH
Organic days of medium to high plasticity
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
PTia
Peat, muck, and other highly organic soils
ROCK
Undifferentiated as to type or composition
KEY TO BORING AND TEST PIT SYMBOLS
CLASSIFICATION TESTS
STRENGTH TESTS
AL
ATTERBERG LIMITS TEST
TV
FIELD TORVANE (UNDRAINED SHEAR)
SA
SIEVE ANALYSIS
UC
LABORATORY UNCONFINED COMPRESSION
HYD
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
TXCU
CONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED TRIAXIAL
P200
PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE
TXUU
UNCONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED TRIAXIAL
P4
PERCENT PASSING NO. 4 SIEVE
UC, CU, UU = 1/2 Deviator Stress
SAMPLER TYPE
UNDISTURBED CORE SAMPLE: STANDARD PENETRATION
MODIFIED CALIFORNIA OR TEST SAMPLE
HYDRAULIC PISTON SAMPLE
X DISTURBED OR BULK SAMPLE X ROCK OR CORE SAMPLE
NOTE: Test boring and test pit logs are an interpretation of conditions encountered at the location and time of
exploration. Subsurface rock, soil and water conditions may differ In locations and with the passage of
time. Lines defining interface between differing soil or rock description are approximate and may
indicate a gradual transition.
FILE: Sail ClasmMq
SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART
Lee Property Development
San Rafael, California
A-1
Nit 912.01 Date 5/23/02 � rove Figure
Fracture Classification
Crushed
Intensely fractured
Closely fractured
Moderately fractured
Widely fractured
Very widely fractured
Low
Moderate
Hard
Very hard
Friable
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Very strong
FRACTURING AND BEDDING
Spacing
less than 3/4 inch
3/4 to 2-1/2 inches
2-112 to 8 inches
8 to 24 inches
2 to 6 feet
greater than 6 feet
HARDNESS
Bedding Classification
Laminated
Very thinly bedded
Thinly bedded
Medium bedded
Thickly bedded
Very thickly bedded
Carved or gouged with a knife
Easily scratched with a knife, friable
Difficult to scratch, knife scratch leaves dust trace
Rock scratches metal
STRENGTH
Crumbles by rubbing with fingers
Crumbles under light hammer blows
Indentations <1/8 inch with moderate blow with pick end of rock hammer
Withstands few heavy hammer blows, yields large fragments
Withstands many heavy hammer blows, yields dust, small fragments
WEATHERING
Complete Minerals decomposed to soll, but fabric and structure preserved
High Rock decomposition, thorough discoloration, all fractures are extensively
coated with clay, oxides or carbonates
Moderate Fracture surfaces coated with weathering minerals, moderate or localized discoloration
Slight A few stained fractures, slight discoloration, no mineral decomposition,
no affect on cementation
Fresh Rock unaffected by weathering, no change with depth, rings under hammer Impact
FILE: Rock Class.dM
COPYRIGHT 7989, MR.LER PACIFIC ENGINEERING GROUP
NCTF— Tmt t okV and I"t pk lop are an intsrplma9oo of wndibans enmrekamd m 9u lomdan wd eme d eVI"ion.
Smgorlace rock, soN and *mer condiil ms may Mer M dfw loeddm WO wMh Ow PassVe oftkT*.
ROCK CLASSIFICATION CHART
Lee Property Development A-2
San Rafael, California
Pr*ct 912.01 Date 5/23/02 BtX—"d Figure
Q
o
r
0
BORING 1
o a
�
V
EQUIPMENT: Minuteman, 4 -inch
Z
C7
a
w
solid stem augers
W
r
W
oit
z
CO ~
z
W
a_
r DATE: 3/19/02
m ELEVATION: +161 feet
O
z r i
p
m
0 0
}—
p
:?
D
`REFERENCE: HWB, Lands of Vince Lee,
---�0
_ 0
Topographic Map, January 2002
�
,� SILTY CLAY (CL)
brown, moist, soft to medium stiff, low plasticity
_-
24 14.5 117 1
5-
56 10.4 120 -
-2
50/5" 7.9
3 10..
-4 -
15-
- 5
6 20 -
FRANCISCAN MELANGE
completely weathered sandstone, brown and tan,
weak, low hardness, coarse grained, intensely
fractured
drilling rate 7 min/ft
Bottom of hole at refusal at 10.5 feet
No groundwater encountered
NOTES: (1) MLTRIC EQUIVALENT STRENGTH (kPa) a 0,0479X STRENGTH (psQ
FILE: 912.01I.oy..d o (2) METRIC EQUIVALENT DRY UNIT WEIGHT kWM3= 0.1571 x DRY UNIT WEIGHT (per)
COPYRIGHT 2603. MILLER PACIFIC ENGINEERING GROUP (3) GRAPHIC SYMBOLS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
BORING LOG
Lee Property Devolopment
A-3
San Rafael, California
912.01 Date 5!23/02 a P-ved
Figure
Q
o $ .� BORING 2
U)
CL o EQUIPMENT: Minuteman, 4 -inch
LU UJ w U, w V solid stem augers
<t w — �- w -r DATE: 3/19/02
LU o LU z 0 v ii m ELEVATION: +174 feet
O m o E "'REFERENCE: HWB, Lands of Vince Lee,
z 00 --'— — 0 -0 , Topographic Map, January 2002
SILTY CLAY (CL)
dark brown, moist, soft to medium stiff, low
plasticity, high organics
FRANCISCAN MELANGE
highly weathered sandstone, mottled tan, brown
and rust, weak to moderately strong, moderate
74 6.8 1 hardness
drilling rate 12 min/ft
77 5.2
2 - Bottom of hole at refusal at 6.5 feet
No groundwater encountered
-3 10-
-4 —
15-
-5
6 20-
NOES: (1) METRIC EQUIVALENT STRENGTH (kPa) 0,0479 x STRENGTH (psi)
FILE 9I2.011ogcd g (2) METRIC EQUIVALENT DRY UNIT WEIGHT kWm3= 0.1571 x DRY UNIT WEIGHT (Pcf
COPYRIGHTZODI, MILLER PACIFIC MINEEAING GROUP (3) GRAPHIC SYMBOLS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
BORING LOG
sy:-3I Lee Property Devolopment A_L�
',r�A�I1ct33FtSan Rafael California
Imola« 912.01 Date 5/23/02 Appmad
BY: 14WFigure
Q v o BORING 3
Cf) m LL N EQUIPMENT: Minuteman, 4 -Inch
CO w= w w w m solid stem augers
Ix Z o- Z �' o w J DATE: 3118102
ww e�W- a m ELEVATION: +144 feet
O Ir 0
- m g O o > 'REFERENCE: HWB, Lands of Vince Lee,
U)
Topographic Map, January 2002
0-0
SILTY CLAY (CL)
f% dark brown, moist, soft to medium stiff, low
plasticity, high organics
5015" 3.8 FRANCISCAN MELANGE
highly weathered sandstone, mottled tan, brown
5011" 4.6 and black, weak to moderately strong, tow
hardness, intensely fractured
less weathered with depth, drilling rate 20 min/ft
-2 Bottom of hole at refusal at 5.1 feet
- No groundwater encountered
-310-
-4
15—
_5
—6 20 --
NOTES: ((1) METRIC EQUIVALENT STRENGTH (kPa) s 0.0479 x STRENGTH (psn
FILE:012.01Loge.d" (2METRIC EQUIVALENT DRY UNIT WEIGHT kNhn3= 0.1671 x DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pen
COPYRIGHT 2001, MILLER PACIFIC Ef�.INEERINO GROUP (3; GRAPHIC SYMBOLS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
BORING LOG
�x Lee Property Devolopment A-5
a��Net' San Rafael California
2
Ct 912.01 Date 5/23/02 A t61ed Figure
Q =
-6
20--
NO rEs: (1) METRIC EQUIVALENT STRENGTH (kPa) = 0.0479 x STRENGTH (psf)
BORING 4
cn In
U.
-.
-R
N
x "
EQUIPMENT: Minuteman, 4 -inch
w W x
W
uj a_
A-6
w
San Rafael, California
solid stem augers
I— 0
W
Q-
Z
�
�" �„
o
W
DATE: 3/18/02
m ELEVATION:
w
co
oJ.
+140 feet
O
m
U
o
E °'
`REFERENCE: HWB, Lands of Vince Lee,
"� Topoqraphic Map, January 2002
0-0
SILTY CLAY (CL)
_
dark brown, moist, medium stiff, low
plasticity, high organics
MELANGE
IFRANCISCAN
highly weathered sandstone, mottled brown, gray
5014"
12.1
and rust, weak to moderately strong, moderate
hardness, drilling rate 9 min/ft
Bottom of hole at refusal at 4,0 feet
5-
No groundwater encountered
_2
-3 10-
-4 -
15-
-6
20--
NO rEs: (1) METRIC EQUIVALENT STRENGTH (kPa) = 0.0479 x STRENGTH (psf)
dxq �
2) METRIC EQUIVALENT DRY UNIT WEIGHT IcNh3m 0.1571 x DRY UNIT WEIGHT
�3) GRAPHIC SYMBOLS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
(pd)
COPYRIGHT 200
COPYRIGHT 2461, MILLER PACIFIC ENGINEERING GROUP
x "
BORING LOG
Lee Property Devolopment
A-6
San Rafael, California
912.01 Deft 5/23/02 A rovW
Figure
t
v
3
o
FILE; 912.01Loos,d q
2METRIC EQUIVALENT DRY UNIT WEIGHT kWM3= 0,1571 x DRY UNIT WEIGHT (Kn
COPYRIGHT 2001, MILLER PACIFIC ENGINEERING GRWP
BORING 5
Q
Con
a
LL
°e
..
EQUIPMENT: Minuteman, 4 -inch
U)
W W
w
W
`
wi
solid stem augers
t- z
Ir
�w
a.
�n
W z
W
�'
z
o
W a
DATE: 3/19102
5
O
BI-
O
��_
L
0.m
ELEVATION: +144 feet
`REFERENCE: Lands Vince
O u~i
in
2
o 5
E
y
0 v)
HWB, of Lee,-
0-0
Topographic Map, January 2002
SILTY CLAY (CL)
_
dark brown, moist to wet, medium stiff, low
plasticity, with rootlets and occasional sandstone
_
fragments
14
111
115
'-1
FRANCISCAN MELANGE
-
highly weathered sandstone, mottled brown, gray
and rust, weak to moderately strong, moderate
6013"
3.3
5-
hardness
drilling rate 30 min/ft
Bottom of hole at refusal at 6.0 Beet
-2
_
No groundwater encountered
METRIC EQUIVALENT STRENGTH (kPa) m 0.0479 x STRENGTH (pan
NO rES:�3'�
FILE; 912.01Loos,d q
2METRIC EQUIVALENT DRY UNIT WEIGHT kWM3= 0,1571 x DRY UNIT WEIGHT (Kn
COPYRIGHT 2001, MILLER PACIFIC ENGINEERING GRWP
GRAPHIC SYMBOLS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
BORING LOG
Lee Property Devolopment
A-7
San Rafael, California
Hoc'
912.01 Date 5123/02 Awmved
Figure
95-
-5
-6 20 -
NOTES: (1) METRIC EQ)IIVALENT STRENGTH (kPa) = 0.0479 x STRENGTH (psi}
2 METRIC EQUIVALENT DRY UNIT WEIGHT kN1m9= 0.1571 x DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pd)
PILE: 012.01LOG, &9 #3) GRAPHIC SYMBOLS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
COPYFUGHT 2001, MILLER f ACIPIC ENGINEERING GROUP
��a` ` BORING LOG
W
w , Lee Property Devolopment A-8
San Rafael, California
N° 912.01 Data 5123102 proved Figure
BORING 6
(=n a
8
O
a
EQUIPMENT: Minuteman, flinch
Cl)
LU
z
a
Lu a=
,
o
solid stem augers
= z
ul
J
DATE: 3!19!02
w It Ul
h
12
ii
®
ELEVATION: +146 feet
~
O
2 L)
o
�'
E
¢
} "REFERENCE: HWB, Lands of Vince Lee,
(n
m
cn
(n
Topographic Map, January 2002
0-0
SILTY CLAY (CL)
dark brown, moist, medium stiff to stiff, tow
plasticity, with rootlets
-
og"
_
` 1
'moo
27
21.6
-
FRANCISCAN MELANGE
5-
highly to completely weathered sandstone,
mottled brown, black and rust, weak, low
51
13.7
116
_
hardness, intensely fractured
_2
_
drilling rate 15 min/ft
75
9.3
-3
10
Bottom of hole at 10.0 feet
_
No groundwater encountered
95-
-5
-6 20 -
NOTES: (1) METRIC EQ)IIVALENT STRENGTH (kPa) = 0.0479 x STRENGTH (psi}
2 METRIC EQUIVALENT DRY UNIT WEIGHT kN1m9= 0.1571 x DRY UNIT WEIGHT (pd)
PILE: 012.01LOG, &9 #3) GRAPHIC SYMBOLS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
COPYFUGHT 2001, MILLER f ACIPIC ENGINEERING GROUP
��a` ` BORING LOG
W
w , Lee Property Devolopment A-8
San Rafael, California
N° 912.01 Data 5123102 proved Figure
QBORING
�V
7
o
c=r> n S
a
N
EQUIPMENT: Minuteman, 4 -inch
w
w
solid stem augers
H
? o- y
o
Lu DATE: 3/19/02
W
LU
W N
12
a m ELEVATION: +134 feet
zm g O
'REFERENCE: HWB, Lands of Vince Lee,
0
0
Topographic Map, January 2002
0-0
v SILTY CLAY (CL)
_
dark brown, moist, medium stiff to loose, low
plasticity, with rootlets and organics
-
SANDY CLAY (CL) (RESIDUAL SOIL)
mottled light tan and brown, moist, stiff
-1
FRANCISCAN MELANGE
31 16.9
_
completely weathered sandstone, mottled brown,
tan and gray, weak, low hardness, intensely
5-
fractured
47 15.6
113
_
-2
drilling rate 5 min/ft
-
drilling rate 10 min/ft
50/5 8,2
� 3 10-
Bottom of hole at 9,8 feet
No groundwater encountered
-4 -
15-
-6 20--
NO rES: (1) METRIC EQUIVALENT STRENGTH (kft) a 0.0479 x STRENGTH (psf)
(2) METRIC EQUIVALENT DRY UNIT WEIGHT kN1m3- 0.1571 x DRY UNIT WEIGHT' (pcf)
3 GRAPHIC SYMBOLS ARE ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY
( )
COPYRIGHT 01, MIAW9
COPYRIONT 2001, MILLER PACIFIC ENGINEERING GROUP
rte» a y,;.fu
v
BORING LOG
Lee Property Devolopment A-9
San Rafael, California
P
912.01
Dace 5/23/02 NVMved Figure
Q V
o
BORING 8
W W
U.
o
v
F
EQUIPMENT: Minuteman, 4 -inch
U) w=
w
w 0
r
w
c solid stem augers
`J
r z
a
Ix Z
U.1
�
o
w J DATE: 3119102
LU o w
a m ELEVATION: +109 feet
0 O
o
ani
2 "'REFERENCE: HWB, Lands of Vince Lee,
Topographic Map, January 2002
0-0
SILTY CLAY (CL)
_
fight brown, moist, stiff, low plasticity, with
occasional sandstone fragments to 3/4"
-
FRANCISCAN MELANGE
_
moderatly weathered sandstone, light brown,
- i
moist, moderatly strong, moderately hard,
29
6.3
_
intensely fractrured
drilling rate 10 min/ft
5 -
Bottom of hole at refusal at 4.5 feet
-
No groundwater encountered
-2
-310-
-4
15-
`5
-6 20 -
NOTES: (1) MLTRIG EQUIVALENT STRENGTH (kPa) = 0.0479 x STRENGTH (Pd)
FILE: 012.01Log..d+q (3) METRICGRAPHIC SYMBOLS AREILLUSTRATIVE
EQUIVALENT DRY UNI WEIGHT
NLYa— 0.1571 x DRY UNIT WEIGHT (PCO
COPYRIGHT 2001, MILLER PACIFIC ENGINEERING GROUP ( )
BORING LOG
Lee Property Devolopment A-1 Q
San Rafael, California
No *' 912.01 Dare 5123102 pry',., f "d f/�{� Figure
ATTCHMENT 4
Title Report, Preliminary Title Report,
Prepared by Stewart Title of California, July 6, 2016
Urn
Stewart title Be texen r1I
sm. or calAro,m., aha
2&W Cordek. Rand, Sure dao
Faefdtl, CAS4534
Ph— (415)402.1241
Fu (415) 5322721
PRELIMINARY REPORT
Order No, 01180-202186
Title Unit No. 7531
Your File No,
Buyer7Bonewer Name Marin Open Space Trust
Seller Name \Intend Lee
Property Address: APN: 012-320-09 & 012-320-10, San Rafael, CA
In response to the above referenced application for a Policy of Title Insurance, Stewart Title of California,
Inc hereby reports that It is prepared to issue, w muse to be issued, w of the date hereat, a Stewart Title
Guaranty Company Policy or Policies of Title Insurance desc ibhtg the land and the estate or Interest
therein hereinafter set font, Insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or
encumbrance not shown or referenced to as an Exception on Schedule B or not excluded from coverage
pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions, and Stipulations of said Policy forme.
The printed Exceptions and Exclusion. from the coverage and Limitations on covered Risks of said pokey
or policies are set hath in Exhibit A attached. The policy to be Issued may contain an arbitration clause.
When the Amount of Insurance is dew than that set font In the arbitration clause, all arbitiah:e matters
shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the
parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title
Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maxlm rn Dollar Limits of Liability for certain
coverages are also set firth In Exhibit A. Copies of the policy fors should be read. They are avetable
from the office which Issued this report
Please read the exceptions sham or referred to below and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in
Exhibit A of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of
maters, which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully
considered.
It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of bele
and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land,
This report, (and any supplements or arrendments thereto) is Issued solely for the purpose of radlhating
the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability Is assumed hereby. If it Is desired that liability be
assumed prior to "issuance of a policy of title insurance a birder or mmmtment should be requested.
Dated as of July 00, 2018 at 7:30 a.m. Update No. 1
Big Curry, Tele Officer
When replying, please contact Jackie Boccabelb, Escrow OTxer
Stewart Title of California, Inc.
1701 Novato Blvd., Ste 202
Novato, CA 94947
(415) 892.5800
File rlo.: OIIMZ02163 Fc.e h a 9
Profm Report SCE
.► v:u*'Im
The tart of Policy of Title Insurance contemplated by this report is:
® CLTA Standard Cammge Policy
❑ CLTA/ALTA Homeowners Policy
❑ 2006 ALTA Owner's Policy
09 2606 ALTA Loan Policy
❑ ALTA Short For Residential Lean Polley
❑ -
SCHEDULEA,
The "tat. or interest In the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report Is:
Fee
Title to said estate or Interest at the date hereof 1s vested in:
Vmcent H. Lee, an unmarried man
Fee Ne,'. 01180.202165 Page 2IX
Pre- Rein SCE
The land relemed to herein Is situated in the State of California, County of Marin, City of San
Rafael and described as follows:
Lots 21Aand 22A. as shown upon that certain Parcel Map entlled'Parcel Map Stowing Lot Line
Adjustments of Lots 19 through 22 of Map of Oakwood Unit 2, filed in Book 19 of Maps, at Page 11,
etc., City of San Rafael, County of Merin, State of Califomla% filed for record September 14, 1966 In
Rook 24 of Pani MBs at Pace 29 Marin County Records.
APN: 012-320-09 8 012320-10
THE MAP ATTACHED THROUGH THE HYPERLINK ABOVE IS BEING PROVIDED AS A COURTESY
AND FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY, THIS MAP SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON.
FURTHERMORE, THE PARCELS SET OUT ON THIS MAP MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL
SUBDIVISION OR BUILDING ORDINANCES. THERE WILL BE NO LIABILITY, RESPONSIBILITY OR
INDEMNIFICATION RELATED TO ANY MATTERS CONCERNING THE CONTENTS OR ACCURACY
OF THE MAP.
(End of Legal Description)
Fee Na: oil o 20Z7t3 Papa 3d9
Prii Repon SCE
SCHEDULE B
At the date hereof, oxceptions to coverage M addition to the printed exceptions and exclusions,
contained In said policy or policies would be as follows:
Taxes:
A Property taxes, which are a Iron not yet due and payable, Including any assessments collected
with taxes, to be levied for the fiscal year 2016 — 2017.
B. The lien of supplemental taxes, i1 any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5
(comrincr ing with Section 75) of the revenue and taxation code of the State of California.
C. Assessments, it any, for Community Facility Districts affecting said land which may exist by virtue
of assessment maps or notices filed by said districts. Said assessments are collected with the
County Taxes.
Exceptions
1. Conditions as contained in that certain 'Covenant in Perpetuity', executed by Paul J. Felton,
recorded November 20, 1972 in Book 2632 of Official Recons at Paoe 36 Official Records.
2. Notes as shown upon that certain Map recorded April 11, 1994 in ,olu�Rq 19 of ps at Page 11.
Marin County Records, which states, 'No building permits will be saved for any lot In the
subdivision until a permanent wafer supply Is provided for each Individual parcel shown on that
pad of the final map
Said Note is also depicted upon the filled Mag referred to herein.
3. An easement or other provisions for the purpose of roadway and public utititles and rights
incidental thereto as shown on the Map recorded April 11, 1984 in Volume 19 of Maos, at Pane
-t effecting that portion of said land as shown thereon,
4. An easerni other provisions for the purpose of "City of San Rafael Public Sanitary S.S.E"
and rights incidental thereto as shown on the Map recorded April 11, 1984 in Volume 19 of Maps
at Page 11. affecting that portion of saki lard as shown thereon.
5. An easemerd or other provisions for the purpose of private sanitary sewer and rights incidental
thereto as shown on the Map recorded April 11, 1984 in Volume 19 of Mans at Pace 11affecting
that porion of said land as shown thereon.
6. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions as set forth in an Instrument, but orrotting, except to the
extent permitted by any applicable federal w state law, covenants or restrictions, if any, based on
race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, handicap, sexual orientation, marital
status, ancestry, source of income, disability, medical condition, or other unlawful basis.
Recorded: April 11, 1984 as Ipstrument No 84-017211, Oficial Records.
The conditions therein contain no express words of forfeiture or reversion of title ifviolated.
Note: Section 12956.1 of the Government Code provides the following: If this doalment contains
any restrictions based on race, color, religion, sex, familial status, marital status, disability, national
origin, or ancestry, that restriction violates state and federal fair housing laws and is void. Any
person holding an Interest in Itnls property may request that the county recorder remove tho
restrictive language pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 12956.1 of the Government Code.
Fria Na.: 01180—MI65 Pape 4 of 9
Prean Repan SCE
7. Matters contained in that certaln document entitled'Agreemenl and Gram or Easement',
dated June 14, 1984 to which reference Is made for full particulars by and between Paul Felton
and Dona R. White, recorded June 29, 1984 as Instrument No. 84-031241. Official Records,
Reference is hereby made to the public record for fug particulars
Note: Section 12956.1 of the Government Code provides the following: if this document contains
any restrictions based on race, color, religion, sex, famRW status, marital status, disabidity, national
origin, or ancestry, that resixction violates state and federal fair housing laws and is void. Any
person holding an Interest In this property may request that the county recorder reprove the
restrictive language pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 12956.1 of the Government Code.
6. An easement for Ingress and egress for vehicles and pedestrians and rights Incidental thereto as
set forth in a document recorded June 29, 1964 as Instrument No. 64-031241, Official Records,
affecting the Easterly portion of Lot 22A, described herein.
Said easement Is also depicted upon the filed Map referred to herein.
9. An easement for underground and aboveground udli0es and rights inGdentsi thereto In favor of
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation as set forth in a document recorded
August 28, 1987 as Instrument No. 87-056381, Official Records, affecting the extreme
Northeasterly portion of Lot 22A, described herein.
said easement Is also depicted upon the fled Man referred to herein.
10. An easement for pipeline or pipelines and rights incidental thereto in favor of Marin Municipal
Water District, a public corporation as set forth In a document recorded November 30, 1967
as instrument No 87-076433, Official Records, affecting the extreme Northeasterly portion of
Lot 22A, described herein.
Said easement is also depicted upon the filed Mao referred to herein.
11. An easement for private sanitary sewer purposes, 30 feel wide and rights Incidental thereto as set
forth in a document recorded May 18. 1988 as j{+s¢grmnrt Np. 88-25815. Official Records,
affecting the Easterly portion of Lot 22A, descri rein.
Said easement Is also depicted upon the fled Mao referred to herein.
12. An easement or other previsions for the purpose of 40 bot private drainage and rights Incidental
thereto affecting that portion of Lots 21A and Lot 22A as shown on the Parcel Map referred to
nerein.
13. An easement or other Previsions for the purpose of 30 foot private ingress, egress and utilities
easement appurtenant to Lot 21A and rights Incidental thereto affecting that portion of Lot 22A, as
shown on the Parcel Mao referred to herein.
14. An easament or other pmvislons for the purpose of City of San Rafael, 30 foot sanitary sewer
easement and rights incidental thereto affecting the extreme Northeasterly portion of Lot 22A, as
shown on the Parcel Mao referred to herein.
15. Terms, conditions and provisions as contained in that certain document entitled *Declaration",
recorded September 12, 1989 as Instrument No 89-052861, Official Records,
Reference is hereby made to the pudic record for full particulars.
fie Na: 011 B&M 105 Peq. S a 9
Rolm R"p sCE
Note: Section 12956.1 of the Government Code provides the following: It this document contains
any restrictions based on rata, color, religion, sex, familial status, marital status, disability, national
origin, or ancestry, that restriction violates state and federal fair housing laws and Is void. Any
person holding an interest In this property may request that the county recorder reoove the
restrictive language pursuant to subdNlslon (c) of Section 12956.1 of the Government Code.
16. Please be advised that our search did not disclose any open deeds of trust of record.
If you should have knowledge of any outstanding obligation, please comet your
Site officer Immediately for further review.
17. It the poI4 to be issued requires priority insurance, over mechanic's liens and work has or a to
be commenced prior to recording, this company wit require a sufficient and approved indenri:y
agreement from the ownerttrustor. To help avoid delays In your transaction, we should receive all
pertinent Information at least 5 working days prior to the close of escrow. Should you have any
questions or need any additional information, please contact your We officer.
18. Any lien, or right to a gen, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished,
imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records.
(End of Exceptions)
I%Nv.:0118p M W Pe9.sa9
ft" liepom SCE
NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS
For transactions where Stewart Idle of CaNiamia, Inc. is not the settlement/closing agent, a signed and
dated copy of the attached "Acknowledgment of Receipt. Understanding and Approval of Affiliated
Business Arrangement Disclosure Stalolnern and STS Privacy Notice for Stewart Title Companies", will
be required prior to recording.
A General and Special mCity andlor County taxes, including any personal property taxes and any
assessents collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2015 -2016 have been paid In full.
1st Installment $1,645.32 Paid
2nd instalment $1,645.32 Paid
Parcel No. 012.320-09
Code Area 0084M
B. General and Special City and/or County taxes, including any personal property taxes and any
assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2015 - 2016 have been paid In full.
,at installment $1,605.99 Paid
2nd Installment $1,605.99 Paid
Parcel No. : 012-320.10
Code Area : 008-000
C. According to the public records, there has been no conveyance o1 the land within a period of
twenty-four months prior to the date of this report -
D. The charge for a policy of title insurenos, when issued through this title order, will be based on the
Basic Rate.
E, The map attached, if any, may w may not be a survey of Ue land depicted hereon. Stewart Title
expressly disdains any Nobility for loss w damage which may result from reliance on this map
except to the extent coverage for such loss or damage Is expressly provided by the term; and
provisions of the title insurance policy, it any, to which thls map is attached.
F. A Preliminary Change of Ownership Report must be completed by the transferee (buyer) prior to
the transfer of property in accordance with the provisions of Section 480,3 of the Revenue and
Taxation Code. The Preliminary Change of Ownership Report should be submitted to the recorder
concurrent with the recordation of any document effecting a change of ownership. If a document
evidencing a change ofownership (i.e. Deed, Affidavit -Death Joint Tenant) is presented to the
recorder for recording without a preliminary change of ownership report, the recorder may charge
an additional $20.00
G. It your property h in San Francisco, it Is the requirement of the City and County of San Fmrciscn
that a Transfer Tax affidavit to be completed and signed by the Grantor for each deed submitted
for recording. This is an addition to a Preliminary Charge of Ownership Report
H. In addition to County Transfer Tax, any conveyance of the herein described property may be
subject to a City Transfer and/or Conveyance Tax, as follows.
Fire No.: 01156202165
Prerm Ripon SCE
Alameda
$12.00 Der thousand
Alban
$11.50 Der thousand
Barker
$1500 per thousand
Cuh; /fv
$4.50 ypr thousand
Emeryv(;ICe
$12.00 Dqf thousand
rd
$4.50 per thousand
pori of Hillsborough
$0.30 per thousand (gross sales receipt tax)
Check should be sent directly m:
Town of Hillsborough
1600 Floribunda Avenue
Hillsborough, CA 94010
Phone No. 650.375.7400
This tax does not need to be reflected on Grant Deed.
The San Mateo County Recorder does not collect for this tax.
Los Art pies
$4.50 Der thousand
Mountain View
_
$3.30 er thousand
I Oakland
$i5.� Der thousand
Pato Alto
$3.30 Dar thousand
Petaluma
Piedmont3.8�De,
Fp r�pysand
Urousand
I Pomona
1 Per I(s�cusan{�((
J8Der
I Redondo Beach
hOusand
IR 'hnmd
1$7.00 Der thousand
IRiverside
1$1.10 thousand
I Sacramento
$2.7r thousand
I San Leandro
$6.00 {{��`r thousand
City and County of
up to .000=$5.00 per thousand
San Francisca
$260,000 to $1,000,000= $6.eO per thousand
$1,000,000 to $5,000,000 = $7.50 per tlwuamd
$5,000,000 to 10,000,000 = $20.00 per thousand
Above $10,000,000 = $25.00 per thousand
(Do not add Ue additional $1.10 for County Tax, it is Included)
San Jose
$3.30 per 1Musend
San Mateo
$5.00 per thousand
ISan Rafael
$2.00 Der thousand
I Saha Monica
$3.00 Der thousand
I Santa Rosa
$2.00 Der thousand
Vaileb
$3.30 per thousand
I, and
$1.10 per thousand
I'Ve7Me
Additional Requirements for'Short Sala Transactions h which a tender wit accept less than the
outstanding balance of its ban as full satisfaction of the obligation:
The Company VAR require, prior to the issuamce of a policy of 011e insurance, evidence that the fir•.
position trust deed holder has received and acknowledged all payments to be made to subordina
position lien holders, regardless of whether such payments are to be made from proceeds or fron
contributions by real estate brokers and/or buyers In the subject transaction, lir from other third -p
spumes. Evidence shall include but not be limited to: (a) a written demand from the first -position
deed holder acknowledging and approving payments to subordinate -position lien hollers from
proceeds and otherwise; or (b) a supplemental letter of amended demand from the first -position 1
holder acknowledging pays ants to be made U subordinate lien holders from sources other then
proceeds (including broker commissions; and additional buyer deposits),
nae Ro.: wle6zo2tes Pew e a e
Preen Repon SCE
FUNDS"LAW
California Insurance Code Section 12413.1 regulates the disbursement of escrow and sub-esvow funds
by title companies. The law requires that funds be deposited in the Lige company escrow account and
available for withdrawal prior to d-abursemerkt Funds received by Stewart Tills of Cagfomia. Inc. via wire
transfer may be disbursed upon receipt Funds received via cashiers checks or teller checks drawn on a
California Bank maybe disbursed on the next business day after the day of deposit If funds arerecelved
by any other means, recording and/or disbursement may be delayed, and you should contact your bile or
escrow officer. All escrow and sub -escrow funds received will be deposited with other escrow funds in
one or more non-interest bearing escrow accounts In a financial institution selected by Stewart Tale of
California, Inc.. Stewart Title of California, Inc. my receive certain direct or h1o'ved benefits from the
financial Institution by reason of the deposit of such funds or the maintenance of such accounts with the
financial institution, and Stewart Title of California, Inc. shall have no obligation to account to the
depositing party in any manner for the value of, or to pay to such party, any benefit received by Stewan
Title of California, Inc.. Such benefits shall be deemed additional compensation to Stewart Title of
California, Inc. for its services in connection with the escrow or sub -escrow.
If any check submitted is dishonored upon presentation for payment, you are authorized to nogg all
principals and/or their respective agents of such nonpayment
FW No.: a1180.2a21M
Prt nepak SCE
Poe 9Ma
m 1�
'� a �R $g�,`i:
[
Y�
t'E,•�
!_ F'■#
®■ ..� 4i.
a
'!i�'!- -Yu3Ee
�
oma,
tsE�
isvc
� o
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Order No.: 01100.202165
Escrow Na.: 01100-202165
The land referred to herein Is situated in the State of California, County of Marin, City of San Rafael and
described as foh—:
Lots 21A and 22A, as shown upon that certain Parcel Map entiffed'Parcel Map Showing Lot Line
Adjustments of Lot'
10 through 22 of Map of Oakwood Und 2, filed In Back 19 of Maps, at Page 11,
etc., City of San Rahe), County of Marin, State of California', filed for record September 14, 1989 in
Beck 24 01 Parcel Mag;. at Page 29 Marin Comfy Records,
APN: 012-32"9&012-320-10
(End of Legal Description)
CLTA Proamfnary Report Form
Exhibit (Revised 06-03.11)
CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY —1990
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
Tim keowoq manors da e�reeely e.reded hon N wwraae or Oaf pd;cy and tlm CAmDew ab ml Pw �a or eanraR, a -b, —mll
keg wegermas wbdr m q mason a
t. (.) A" bw, wamems a parmmmdN eaaaum (hekdlna ba nor ann.a m eumrq w xormm Iowa. wdherma, w reg--)
mendhre.reaNamq.Per cwr v0)m.«o�Dmy.we,erdVw—mhnwna.Wm.mm.a...aanamknswk—fi.a
Any m48.wnaM row w Mmdbr erected en be latll (V) a sel, e In ow Np ore dhw it Bre de.embm .r me a Be IwN
wew P.nelawhdrde brd m..an..sn: wIYd e___ 'a _ or me eaed a any Ndarhn or laws. -e -sa
tlwerrmentel mo—nw or
-_V form. N.bmn weteaee vlola.n aR Ire mo Iwgicor been—ded In me wb& mord. al DNe .f P izv.
(h) Aay a0amrmemtl pa¢ purer nil eadWeO hY (.) ebosm, s. -p m Bm eater. mil. reg- a ere e.ertus Brereof a m8- d a
0610A sm w .masbama nn " hum s dob3en w ebped vldee.n dredit land nn bush rarsd.e her ps6lm reewde N
Dsee a Po§w.
(b) My patmrmenlN DdYx Dowd nor wAWadeO by (s) oboe, e.wpl m me aaea NN a nod- o(Vm s.m®e tlmmd.r rr.lss a
dekd. kn w M brmea rewb V para • Vo w eheae0 NNeeon eeetli� tlw krd nae been recwtlee es Lha m.eic mvatle s1
Oalaa Pokey
2. RWae a emwm donehr umau nodus a dm ..erose 1—d icor been mwdw h ew pWk m-rds N 0.b .l PL -y, bN M
adid'arp hum mwaaa arty t N whhe --ed prmr k Deb of Pap srneh wares Do badrq an ee r isms elf, purchewr M
wIN -moil hmwbdpe.
3. Defede.eety, enadMll-e. adxxu loon. or orad mNbm:
(e) wnebpr w rot recadad h ew pWq m -ms N Dale of Po/ey. DN veebd, avevrM,.sewnae w aa+..d b DY tle homed dammnt
(lfI rUl.nt w b aw CwnPew• k recoiled h Bm pudic nc.Na d Oek d Pd%bub firman m ira Moved 1 W. p ky nil ®..used
m wdkgbere Ca-orwemimaredd'i l vi., I. Va tlNa e1e Wumd dehnW bcuma en irmumd uMer W. paw:
(.) _hk m m mu w damage k Bb hrswod deBrmnC
(a adeclrhrawveNed subs 'bwbaPdky,w
lel m.brq h mea ar d— wM1tlr w -B rot hw. been ermbhed a Brs hmummm
d elaln nom PNe wpm fw tM Ymrvetl matpeBe w
mr en ealN. a.a.mN mN+ad W orb po&y.
a. urem.+meabah a dw Ben a de Ywwad morq.ge be-vaa a Vre huffy w fewrm d me kmwH et Dam d POB-. w me habalY .r
haat a sM s eaa4aea owmr a Bb hdebmareee, k campy ani Bre app8rsae ddre wmhcu laws a Bre Nam pr wfdtlr em Wil m
.putetl.
3. hm.Bday w caw xba y d 8e Wr d ee bwree mm�e8e, .r dmn —.l, —0.nue aril d mm manaeden s,xi— by Bre
Imured monpi;a and is bawd upon usury d spy -nNm'.r oed4 picumbw w 61eb In lend ng law.
B, MYde.n,MrMeriweeW.IBe trarmeakn ves&eh MatNABd@m OeW.ol kdweal inaWod by bMaD�'-lwm. trenuvmn wealLp
em IMdaet ails hme.d 4Mm, w reason d on otremson Dl !Metal brsuDlry, Nab W OMrrry a ehdm vedeas'rghe Ian.
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE -SCHEDULE B, PART I
TNe P...y e -a ml—re aprmrsl bw w damage (.rel be C.rmuy d nor psy cmb. aMrtey.' bee a s.pemea)'Nedl Brno by moan
1. Tata w.easmsrr x wrkh sm ml .hewn es amag bene by ma r- a AnY bxve euBerdy met leve Ieaaa a euewmems .n
a+l pl-,"or by Bm P. remde.
Pr.mcdrpa hysprCdc sae ywNCnmq aauBmlvaee waeaeemmne.wmerea.l audr pmcaedays.wlmerorw mlMPM by me
m -w a,wr eadrww w orb -aro m..roe.
2. nip lads, rpMe. Immoam, w rbwe aNm Ns torr Wwer by nom puDhc r.c.rtla ba wnAl wub be .a-naMd DY oA mepeW- a1 the
Imd w lM may be w d In pwaorm h,—eNwl memo!
3. Eesdnana. Ikna w msvenbrwees, d da'vra fmrwl, whldr en ml Nmwn M he pubBe recwde.
1. 0um, a. -neeb h Dwrd W Bnes. ahwlege In ores. emrmdvnergs. w mq darer ler'. wNm a ranau eraaey wow disd.a.
ani wads a+e ml drown by ee ISIGke m -de,
S. (e) Ilnpele a m'vr'eg clmrm, (b) memyeeom w vawptWm h Is— w h Acts srBh inrq the mean- Ll 11 (c) ..ler dqv,
damn a LNe b waif, wndna w rot ee melts —PLeJ —1 1.), (b) w (0 am — by the puhBo lewrds.
9. Aw can wnpMba Nen rw seM-a, bpawmddbl ml'nw.n by eb Pmtt__
(R.,, -11) Ppe 1 d1
FBe trm . 81186202163
CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (02-03-10)
ALTA HOMEOWNER'$ POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE
EXCLUSIONS
m saloon m M Easepll In S 0. B, You aro IN boumd "seal WB, mw..lmrmya' baa. aro eawreea reaWtiip Dam:
1. Cowmnard.l Paden purer, aM M lablenee «aWapan d 6asa parWru Pf eM by a pdennmrl repubpon L'orn-erNV-
!. Wadi";
b.Ind
c wbp um;
B. bb NvbmR
1. DRvtrpraBadel oA
Thu F"� tlwanN Ink lmpdN average dasdYatlb Lospred Riek0&, 14, 15, 18. 1e, 19, N. ]]ail.
2. Th IWue PI Yoa Bsu., avudu any wn PI _. m be mrwauticd n amomaae ween .,Deeds bumbq mtlem. lhm
p 4_nal CIA lro.-" dwdbadwCoapred R. 14 «15.
3. The d9M ID bMc pa Larltl by Cd-ArV II. TRs F G.I. does roe U. M covarape kNx ft d In Colcrod Rbk 11.
4. I91FY:
a. 1hl ere de.md, bab,In. a Bmaed m by Ya, whemv or IN Bcy "pear m IM Pfilc Resolve,
D. that are Nwmn b Vpu al M Popcy pale. WI IW b Us, unW. maY ale rewded In pa Pubic Rvsama a1 M PB6.j Oam;
D, mm rewd m ro oxer%j Io YW; a
J. vat ail 0- Ins l>Wcy I]am • ma tom IN ens M m.ereDo eBadmae m cplaree Rbk T. e.e, 25. N. v «ze,
5. rwM wwy'm wYow TAe.
6. LMr w.Ilphk
a. b any bid oubi0e me WB. apedesa0, desalted W rebind 10 n wr"roph 3 d Sdrdde k aM
D, m tlrtob, aisys, awatmreys ba11Wd1 M lend.
lhu Evtknion does nd Inde Ins mverape deavted n Launed Rest 11 a 21.
T Tlq lrarttardtlm The bYWbmaad esapreblmad p.retr or aaaheW ltr.nabr«zawryanca W.r lwmrW b., pty.
LUTAT10M pal 201IERlD PISKS
YOW]insanes br Br INIaft Cowed Rb4 b fmh 1 m Dre Ow Cwk,,e Sb -Il as More:
Fa Cg dRuk 18, te, 19, Ink 21 YWr OMugflb Anawd e+w Our k nIw-llm9 dL-.yshownm SCm A.
Tho tledaltb.mvurA nd marvman d GrtlbshownonSdudNeAnau104-
YourDeducltm Mwrrq Our lb ,I plot LDA d lmDely
Cowml Rua td: 1%ol Potlq ArrwW«s2.800.00 510.x.00
(vdWmsw b baa)
Cowrotl Rsk 1p: 1%0l R>Bty Am«mt « SS,W0.00 I25,600.00
(Wddvaprb Wal
Cawred R. 19: 1%dPAm SS,000210 (25,000.<W
(wh'die_ vmbu)
CMa�etl Rak 21' 1%P l ,4Imoada j2,pDOCd 35,03].00
(MYtlareru ala)
(Rov..60Y11) P"a 2 d4
FU Number, 611 6 6 2 021 6 5
2005 ALTA LOAN POLICY (06.17-06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
11r Mw.bp emlbd tie egreasry oad Nod Dom M cpsxv®pe of eN Pa6q, W fro LomwPY wand P+Y ba or dWn.9e, aab,.porWrya'
fees, a eMeneea NW.Me le rce.on ac
1 (a) AM law. WdIe . ponldl « DWemmmbl rcp WW (ha by Puree mMm b namnp .M zoom]) readdmp. rnbaft.
pmNDR", W aebYgb
(I) pro otaganq, use, «aryopiceN al lne land; '
(Ip BH Cared«. mnwams,«bcae'on alaM mWaanBN erecleEa Mlaro;
(If) MwbaMwnof bn0; or
lM enwpNnvron Wdacdan.
or M l.Ltl d .ny Nde c d Mu laws, ordeu�e. «pawnplmnl>J IepNnp«d Thb Eztlwlan 11a1 dose roe mbdde a drra M
A4 pa mouafe0 under CowrW Reek 3
(t) Arae
Rj awMbrvyal Pda pwW.11da Fidabn 161 dost IN modpy W imd M mwnp. provdld under Covertd Ruk d.
2. RphNolmNran mm.n. TNa btlubn does"l modq«MaMmwr"Bprovbbd Wer Cowretl RINTWB.
9. D.4tk Web, endeMnncoa, sdwne dams. m -1 madero
(a) deabd, atoned, uauns0. «"reed b by pre Naurtd Cb -,,
ib) nW Knbvm b tlr Compmy. roe rcmrd.d N M PUDh. fl c el pato d Potcy, W ✓own w m In+wed CW nv sew nal
dbWyLAManflkpb MCompaM Dy lie Insured CI _ Plmrm tlR doh th belied Ciaimani De[vie int Nsumd undo IRs polis:
(bj revetdfq m ropes «tam"! b W Muted NIq 0
Id) ale 1. «asam.weaam b D.p dPpq Dawpv.a Ou does roe moat W tent ma cowrap. "•"Naas rawer eowaed Risk
11. la, «N): W
Ie) rosutmp m faaa«damage Mtwa/d nothmbean alwedud dpu bwetl CmmbW nae poen vobe b dm Irewoa Ma�spe.
4. llrcnhvaeCNy d p1. bn of M klr k N«spga bassos d ee I My a false Wen baurtd W mnyb - eppM dohp-
bBpneM bwa of M alb Wren pr lWN u.tlY.ed.
3. In"my « In..betty m .h « m Pad W M 1. d M meted Nonage mal vase our d M harmad'mn aNdarv»d by M
mated Ml%p aMb bleednueuy or aM mraumW W dkprdedlm I h lh-V bw.
I, Arty Wbn,grtewnolpm dwramndmo wbeNmmlq, slab meslvenq,WasnOW vetllbrs'/ghb lore. dfd Mtradealhp
pea Oen of M bwwed NWlpaDe, u
(al. M1WNubnl nulwyarae «tr.wumd o -an. dr
(bj a prebrenm eemr« DR Bna'red.an nal elaWdmd m eaaprea R®k 13(b) a:nN Po&Y.
T. AM lien an pr TM b na nlue loos W aueumeda anpoud by Dewnumnbl.ulh y W dbebd al dbdv bBlnen gab d
Pdq aM M d.m of =NOV d M baured None"d kl ben P x Re It. TM Floon does rat muddy W Ilk M m Vb
pl~ ansa Co d Rba 11(b).
TN - okay brm into W uswd la a1bN .- Sbnddd Caws"e W Faferwetl Cowr.w, In .ft- m M .bow EvW ewre hmn
Cawr.p. M E.np6dm awn Caswrepe �n o SlandWd Cosmo pdwa.bo DM1WB M fodowinp &.0bb dour [average,
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
Thu pdq dose IN maws "sinal bu W dam"e lary the ampaM wa IN pay costa. aDWrrcye' Fen a espordes) nhth Woe by res"n
d
1, le) Tana br.vapPnand Cul aro "1 shown as lwW eons by ft Ism of Wry Imp sup "'-*..lavas W uusvmmb an
rcN geparty «by ft
Pu01c Rsads; (b) "maedi". by a PING a I, ma mq mull m eaum a uvessmenb. «Iatlma d suC
p..vdim.,whdhW W ral6hWvn by Mrezad. d a gena «by DbP ki8 .gtle.
2. My IPeb. dphb, ideae'a, a rLbw that an nol alawrl by Rernda Ew aW pub h .eaerbertl by an MdpeCpon d rM VM
or MImq ba ueenadq
-m m posuedm Nft I.W.
9. Gaepdnb, IsmsarancwMroncea.Wda'ons f-. W9zh.re ml[Wan byM Punk Recpda
4, MyprawUmmd,.nambanm,Noldbi,vWl.msn W Wwru ckanlbarwe eead'p M TIpe NNw id Wtliatlpacd try an auvrab
B+1tl colnpleN NM awwY d M Wb and not shcwn
by-Ft-
5-
ydr Pub9cRearde,3. (a)uTppl Winky"0a. (b) I,— a eamWWu m pa ks W M Ada rdbabap ar wu.nn memar, (wain rqN.. �dme
or 0110 m wale, shaaqur u ml Ins ma6an oaalAed vr(o), RI (c) We town by pro pubsc rtmda.
8. Aly lan«dgM.1 me6m for semens. bbaar m.bna wlsMwn by
pea pular records.
ft _0111) P.de 3 d 4
Fde Numb W: 011 9 0. 20 21 6 6
2006 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (06-17-06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The W.Ang ma oWeea ./ Uded arm ft .-.pd Wa poky. .,dBe C,e;r ,nt-tpay mss wdanape. mete, arb,reen'
area, m.apw+aa: tuan We.*
beer by neeon or.
1. (e) " iaw, oo,0—, pern'0. a g—mala lag~ (MuSkV No.a ratato0 b baling — :army) r.s untie'. lag teo g,
prdaoft'l a role" re
N are, oay.Par ). vas. alagoymwM1.1f tan:
M aetlmanaeodenenslorb, abndauof a, beleaemeM
ae4edmab larC;
(Kj eine UbaA—.fb,M;a,
fM arMnn,arnA prdeabn;
a the alba al wry vlda.bn dtivae laws. wdvwxea, orpwanmeMNraip/eGab. ThisF ofution1(e)doe.intmodifyar6rAfew
to—ge Pmsded ume, Cowed Rsk S.
Nl Ariy paammamel paJ x paw. Trw FKs•eon 1(b) dopa ata Maddy a Ibrte 0w mverapa Mn veer Covered Risk 6.
2. fayre ol.eina Boman title EarArNm tlaea rm1 modry a tnl tlw mwmge awldad veer Cow.d ftsk T or 9.
3. oekav,eaa, enamanu.a, aawme Wims,aoBm maOw
(a) oeored. s�f to a .Carol . , noU ro by0w art, P Reoer,
dro real mato to Bin re Coma y, nal racomeC o Oro Pudic Rete ft at Deb al Pairy, M Nrawn to de Imaed Clmnurar ark int
dstWeW b wn9np b By Cm4aw DY B,e ?neared Ciam,ml pMrb the dao its bsu.N GkMmt bep.aw sat bavnd under b.s policy:
(c) nmlYrV h oo bee adameP ro bra truread Gaanart;
(d) a0arM'V a ow,d wbaeau.M to Dab of Peary (namven the dine not Mouy Mimi i Ne re—aQI MWW vqm COCl Rsk 9
am /0]; br
le) mulling b mss a damage But wadd M lave Cam..— B are huvaa Clean W P. Ua. fa -TM
e. My dead, by nevem.l the nperabon of bdeeN benkrWL,.fab Cvohavy, or alines u— fV1d, tows, oral the Ireracson A-V
ger TIb as shorn, a Shadule A. la
W a beuluWB mmayarm a hamakr,l amebt: a
(D) a gvbnnlW baraM KK an/ oaten rot av,d o Cawed Piek B a bb poky.
5. My em P ire near for, out eaw. War or, a—asmed. hnpoasa by Pwmmwdal wk—ty am vested a at bang rehear, Nee a
Poky end N. dab of remoaro I - deed or Wwr bsbwnent a baatr N ave 11ok Rewda Nal —%Toe a. ahavn h Smedub I
The see ge poky ism, wy ba lasuea b armed eAw Shndao Covumpa or Fstenaad Conal, M adnkion to Ne above Esc o,,na hon
co.empe, Our rampbmaf Goarape in e SWmem eoarge P.k) wp Wo baude ma bkpg v Fimpoom Irmo Cvange;
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
ylva per" doe. red nava aga— Ma or.—, (a d Ob masa•y W Y may. aaonwys' Ms a eapanea) .hied arse by ninon
of
t. (a) Tawe a ,r by ams met era npl (b) p as gs &ns by a,e ." vl ave leeeq alaM,iy Mat b./aa have m n>eaarnmb m
real propvny or by tlw PYbBC Racomy he noenf, ops by a pud'c r by the
Nar maY neua b. uvea aasaaverroNa, a Ylms b each
pmexd'age, wheken a ml al,own by the remm➢ piwm aPnry Ur by Ba Pubye Reroms-
2. MY .., dada, eaereeb a tleb,a wdtl, as n9 Nam by de Pub/ —,ole by wdrh mWd be aam,t— by an -Pe of dw
IaM a 4 makhg BVuey of,main m poaaaaam meted.
I Fsserrante, eine or snoanbnncn, a chains bemol,—an ootahawm by Ho Ubeommms-
a. MY a,voaabnont..nmmbry—Nva Yada ons or adverse rYmmamnx Alla-V be nor, that w be dbaoud by m armee
ana ou mbar bM auaay or the Lard ane bW an, trot— by 0w Pa&pc Retards,
6. (a) uryw,mM m-, chime; (U)—,,o lone ur—p— in pebnb a in Ada wMUmdrV Bre us— Bnrm; (c) wMa raids, tla—
or odebvain.—aar a int the meh,n—P/ vim+(.),Cb) a(.)—ahoerr by 4a public eocade.
B. MY ver, w rWHW. l.n Ter, s ., boo, " —UUUu - a o by de PUlk meads.
(Roe- MOM) Pepe a ole
Fee NNnbo,; 0119 M165
STG Privacy Notice
Stewart Tide Companies
WHAT OO THE STEWART TITLE COMPANIES GO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION?
Fddand anh aPPIw atm law anal rc9Wabom She cao—m the right b link some but red ak shaop. Fedeml and epppo0b
d., few mgubgona he recur. N o ink you fww we Cpuad. $Aare, and voted ywr paramd nrormae— Plam read this notim
ove�Ay a urmer„n
ahae we utter mar pvvnal Wornabon. The, "acy nope b edau
isbfed M babaC of me wart SteToe Gutrarry
Convent' and ti bin alhYa,s (me Slewaa Tian C Penka), P—M b Tab V of are Gramm U* l-BideyA (GLBA).
The yges of pmodul Information we maid aneahem Gama M an bin Gredvd or aenha that you have Sought lh=q?, ua. 7hra
inf—libn ca exhodo aodal—Ty numbers aoadnyeya 6mose ownbee,
Ab hnona.lmmp.— , a.- m me Sbw.n Tao CO Uua., nwd be.fun vr.Wme' peraanat obrma0m to run their a-Yety
awlnens—!u pmwas banaallom, and maintain —I.— aaounh. b ke —t- bebw, we 1. the naaona that we um .fare
dratomers penamal blarrna0on; bb nevem that oma choose b Mae;.r,d whebror you can f" rhe champ.
Renaorm ave can Mara y—penarmal Inf—arti.n. Dr war chars Can y" limit this sharing?
Fw ow svoyaay bombe» purpmea—to {,mass yew
Vawaaiwa aM malMeln you aaaraLL Ttra maY a,caoe neadrp 1ne YN tis
bwebu add managig cuatomar amount. svN.. procassop
W
bars.ceg� how 1lm— add sudhln,g arnicas. arV rospondry omen
Oman .M shpafrom.
Fa ow msNsprV purpow—bORr ov pmaucb erg mrv9ra>ro Yw --.�— Pb.-- you
F.r).Jet kabgwah oda ad,a,ew eomp.nba W mo -1 um
Forow,, to ar.".usaasa purPoa.a—vfinnaaon
agora your o,r,noo W o or doncol, They ras an cpm rto
rdan-d by Corartan,amrorafup or mmol They an m Pnerrcial and Yps No
narv9rvnaal a>mpatiea. Our a!5kv(ev maymauda bem�nisa toxin e
Slawamneme: anenval as {,+er,ias burl, as srawarf TNeC part
For ops amuax'wary0ay bgoese pwP.+..—hbrmaarr 1b thY deal Na.
abevyar wtleneaa.
For our aHlSaUam markslbyou—Fa Yvu mmaNence. yen Y..'..M Ypu RnlaM Isar name.tb enaB
Swan hes developed a means for yam to epi ad Som Be M... wore, uvea b year tramat4vs Yat
mahao,V tomo —,1 sub —aNwn b nabpeay r.,— 9 ,U, Ao mamba wn ,e Slmwen omx
bcation ft, t hbnapnv your banpmm by
amaa to optou44stewan.mm or W to
1.900.3359191. 777
fpr non+IflRaba, manmibyov. NofFaghiates arc compaNas M W drnl— 1
mol'—by mammon omabNP a eonVal. They—ba Mantivl
aW non finantld mmpardas.
We moy dbdom you peeve net mkma;ron b ver eRd,ffia. or b—arr*al.a as parmte l by few. If you equeat a bansocbP w o a
om-ol to coat ere • lb" gamy imurmm —Pliny. we wA diadose your pmsvnal bformatbn b bat n Rifiate. (wt do mol mrNoh
branwbseauaoluse of intom,aaon, ane sugpe,1 you refer to mem p ocy nolaea.j
ARING PRACTICES
Haw often do the Swan Tide Compenlp rwM m. We -1 -WY you Woe oursharbp V e—when you.M—.
.bow Nal, P. baur.,
How do Rom Sle-1 Tao Companbs protect my To pro a 1 your pan" information hen unaulhw¢ed amass and Use, we
pen— Won -6-7 use —.w meafua. that mmoy wkh federal bre. Theat, meawn.l
aquae oovrcmer Poe arm bolQnm saoautms.
Hae do nom sn—i Tab Cor— comae my W. mwa rev panonN irt,rtrvgon, for esampk, wren You
ir—rud k1— -7 • requntimuranavao,dservims
• pmrOe Ium krftmU ao b ua
Yde oho moa you, pummel inbawt- from others, such .a Ne mal
.to,
awl or bolo hyaena h you, bamed'mn, ,a it —,rnB ager—,
vgAalea or ofMr cemoaroes.
What aAarte,g un I Ibnh7 AMaugh fed®nl aid W. law give you bin ,gid to b1a1 blaring (e.g.. opt -Q
o rvddn rara art, we do rwt Man yarn --enol WodmNon in ansa
nnbewe..
Coamcf us: H you here any questlaru smut rh, pmxY rwNee, p,sss eon,tt ua at S,wert Title Gwnnty eanW m,
1990 Poet Osk &Ytl., PNrab' Olfkvr, Houston, Tessa 770.56
Ftlo No..b1180.2p2165 Papel
Realm 11-19-2013
.�� a •m
e
yS
O
al
nal
tom^
6y i
t
taw
vc
eb 3 4
®
e
s
e$
p#s
3� o
8 8 i
Nq
s s
4 u
.V
N
Cis' 1 . ' y
1 ' `
�so
O l $ o
- 3\
W
L4rQ +ae
d
� m m
=1�
C C C
®
® dsw.�w�^•a
i.ua+a'p
I �,pwveo�rs� a��
m..,
it
0
1
iK�---t L `s 4L L� 9��+ f•
n
f '
WIN -
0 PW'
rot WD
Sub41'� ....
p.lb ld. �pc:
Dr�c"
Ilk
HIit I
i2
qj,41il f8niill lit I
Il Q
fat
i T
I lit ;
I
—Criptloo; a In,= SublUols bbp - JNook.Fage 19.12 Boge: I f 4
202165 Ct:
Do.=IpU tl JNN,Qk ftbdivjnan Nap - 23ook.p,g. 39.12 Page: 2 of 4
Ord— 202165 C Nnt:
till
till
I ILI
15
141ii
Q'i U
Do.=IpU tl JNN,Qk ftbdivjnan Nap - 23ook.p,g. 39.12 Page: 2 of 4
Ord— 202165 C Nnt:
ATTCHMENT 5
Correspondence to the City Council and the Park and Recreation
Commission and Meeting Notice
CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING GREENWOOD AVENUE OFFER OF DEDICATION
RECEIVED ON THURSDAY AND FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 1 AND 2, 2016
Please do everything you can to maintain the Greenwood access to the Makin Grade trail. I
purchased a home near the trail 8 years ago because it is a wonderful area for kids and dogs!
I'm sure that this trail improves property values in Gerstle Park and brings many hikers and dogs
to a beautiful part of San Rafael.
Btw, I appreciate the improvement in police presence around 4th Street!!
Carol Abrahams -
San Rafael
2. Dear Mr. Jensen,
I have lived in the Gerstle Park area for 15 years now going for a walk nearly every day.
The Makin Grade Trail is an integral part of my routine.
I understand the the City of San Rafael has the opportunity
of making the Makin Grade Trail a permanent open space,
available to the public, in perpetuity.
This trail is historically significant and continues to have importance and give pleasure to many
people on a daily basis.
This is an excellent opportunity for the City of San Rafael to step forward and preserve this trail,
continuing to enhancing the quality of life for all of us who live here.
I sincerely hope that you will give your support to ensure
that Makin Grade Trail will continue to be open to the general public.
With thanks for your attention in reading this email.
Yo u rs,
Adina Beaumont , San Rafael, Ca. 94901
3. Please... You must save this trail for open space, hiking, it has historical significance etc.! My
husband was born and raised in San Rafael and I've been here 38 years and this is a precious
part of our community! I understand some of our neighbors want to purchase it to save it and
this must be the final solution III Do not let it become a private driveway as we cannot afford to
lose this forever. This is a forever decision.
Sincerely, Caryn Papiro, G. Park, S.R.
4. Dear Paul Jensen: I have owned a home in Gerstle Park for over 25 years and
have enjoyed the use of the Mak-en Grade Trail as well as
other Open Space trails from Clark to D Street. Not only for us liumans but this
trail is iniportauit to wild life.
I have been enjoying the deer and other aiiiliials who conte through niy property
on a dally basis.
Regards,
Thonlas Butuier Sal] Rafael, GA 94901
5. Good morning, Jim and Paul: I understand that on September 6th the City Council will be
discussing the donation of two lots abutting the Greenwood Open Space Preserve that will
ensure the preservation of a portion of the historic Makin Grade and enhance access to the
aforementioned Open Space. This is an opportunity not to be missed since the donation will be
made by neighboring property owners to the City and is to be implemented with the assistance
of the Marin Open Space Trust (MOST) which will bear all the closing costs associated with the
property transfer and donation.
I , for one, believe that this proposed donation of lands that results in a modest extension
of existing Public Open Space Lands is clearly in the public interest. It will be accomplished at
no cost to the City of San Rafael , and , therefore, I urge that the City of San Rafael accept and
expedite this donation.
Sincerely,
Roger Roberts
San Rafael, Calif. 949901 Tel:
6. Dear.lim,
I hike the Makin Grade Trail every morning with my husband and two friends. We feel so luckyto
have that open space within a short walk from our house (we live on C Street). On our daily walk we
meet many people that we have come to know and chat with. We have just learned the historical
nature of the path from talking to our neighbors.
The trail is a very important piece of open space in the middle of the city. We hope San Rafael will
keep the Makin Grade Trail open for public use, it would be a great shame to lose this fabulous
asset.
Sincerely, Fran Halperin, Fran Halperin Halperin & Christ, Inc.
2
7. Paul and the City Council
As many of you know, we brought the old Brewmeister's home of the San Rafael Brewery here
atmreenwood Avenue back to life. The old Makin Grade was alive and well as a stagecoach
road to Ross and Bolinas in brewery times ... and likely a stage stop here after a long, dusty day
on the trail.
It is important to keep the Grade open as a part of the great hiking trail system here in San
Rafael and we encourage Paul and the Staff to work with the Council to approve this
opportunity to clarify ownership of the Grade.
It appears to us that the transfer of the ROW to the subdivision was inadvertent or ill advised
and have not found a paper trail that shows the City followed proper notice and procedure in
converting this public property into private hands.
This is the perfect opportunity to clarify public use of the Grade and tie it into the adjacent open
space.
Thank you for your efforts to approve this acquisition.
Ron Moore and Christie Nelson
0
8. It has come to my attention the Makin Grade Trail at the end of Greenwood Ave is being consider for
possible development. I understand there have been private donations made to purchase the land and
donate it to the city to ensure it remains undeveloped open space for years to come. I heard the city is
resisting the donation so I thought I would take the time to help those in the city better understand how
this small patch of land has united a community.
I moved into my home at 138 Greenwood Ave 15 years ago. Shortly after my arrival I was introduced to
this wonderful trail at the end of Greenwood Ave better know as Makin Grade Trail. Over the years the
trail has grow In popularity with dog walkers, elderly and families. It's been amazing to see how this small
patch of land turned I turned into a community center of sorts. It's united the neighbors in a way not
often seen in recent times. Often while in my yard I'll observe familiar faces of groups heading up the the
trail. I'd swear it gets more traffic than Gerstle Park!
I wish there was a better way to convey the importance of this trail to the community. If you were to
install a camera or two for a week I think you'd get an better idea. Hopefully you'll see a way to break
through the red tape and help these lots get converted to open space and preserve the trail for
generations to come.
Thanks,
Thomas Hogan
San Rafael
9. Dear Mr. Jensen,
I am writing as the owner of in
Gerstle Park to let you know of the importance of keeping
Makin Grade Trail open for public use. This is a
neighborhood trail that many people use as a gathering
place, recreational hiking area and dog walking. It is also
part of a historic area. This trail is linked to open space
and provides a safe passage way to hiking the other
trails. Please do everything you can to protect Makin
Grade Trail. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, Jenai Lane
10. Dear Mr Schutz,
I am writing you to implore you to keep our hiking trail open along the old stagecoach route
which is now called Makin Grade. I have been hiking there for the past 26 years, since I first
moved to Gerstle Park. The trail is only 10 minutes from my home on Ross Street, and it has
provided countless hours of relaxation and exercise and sometimes socializing with my
friends who also hike the trail. It is a treasure which we are so fortunate to have out our
back doors, and it is. enjoyed by a great number of people in this neighborhood, and
occasionally their dogs as well. We all take great pride in this trail and various people have
volunteered to keep it properly maintained, such as Hugo Landecker, my neighbor
Mitch, and an elderly gentleman named Rene'.
If this trail is closed due to someone's private driveway being constructed, I will have to get
in my car and drive elsewhere to find an equally lovely and accessible trail. If the money is
available to set this aside as open space, this seems like a no-brainer. There are many
people who use this trail for fitness, a quiet respite, and a restorative communing with
nature; you probably won't receive emails from all of them but I can vouch that the trail is
much used and loved by our neighborhood residents. Please help us save our trail!!
Sincerely,
Cynthia F Cushman
11. From: Deborah Lennon
Please keep this area open for public use. As you know one of the reasons Marin/ San Rafael is
so popular is the easy access to walking and hiking trails. As the populated areas are increasing
and the traffic becoming almost unbearable we need these areas more than ever. This particular
4
area allows my dog and I an area of respite without having to get in my car and driving
somewhere. There must be someway to keep open space available for our community Sincerely
Deborah Lennon Resident of Grestle Park for 30 years
12. From: Land Wilson
Dear Jim and Paul,
I am a San Rafael resident living in the Spring Grove Canyon. I grew up in San Rafael and came
back here in 2004 to raise my family.
I am emailing you to voice my support for protecting Gerstle Park's Makin Grade Trail and Open
Space. I use the San Rafael City Open Spaces in my canyon and the Gerstle Park canyon almost
daily. I am a children's author and I have a routine of walking and writing. For the past 14
months I've been writing a middle grade book specifically about the wildlife that inhabits the
forested areas of both Spring Grove and Gerstle Park.
Coincidentally, I am working with a coalition of other residents, the town of Ross, and Marin
Open Space Land Trust to preserve a nearby 10 acre section of the ridge not far from the Makin
Grade Trail and Open Space (404 and 444 Upper Toyon). This land was annexed out of San
Rafael into Ross in 2007 by the current owner for development. As of yesterday, I have learned
from the owner that development plans are not going to happen because it has been
documented that these forests are home to an endangered owl species.
One of the things that makes Marin such an incredible place to live and/or recreate is that over
the past century, people have stood together to protect our natural open space areas. I implore
you to support protecting the historic Makin Grade Trail and open space area. If you would like
to discuss any details about the wildlife in these areas that I have come to know and love, I
welcome your calls.
Sincerely, Land Wilson
13. Hello Mr. Jensen,
Our family has enjoyed the Makin Grade Trail for over 20 years and have spotted
both bobcats and coyotes on it. It's a neighborhood treasure and should be
preserved and enjoyed for generations to come.
Your help in making this happen would be greatly appreciated.
Kathy & Dan Slane San Rafael, CA
14. 1 am writing to strongly endorse the acquisition of the two vacant lots at the end of Greenwood
Avenue, at no cost to the city. These properties are very challenging and unsuitable for
development due to their steep hillside configuration. Conversely, they are wonderfully suited
to becoming a permanent part of the adjacent existing Open Space. As a frequent user of the
historic Makin Grade trail, which traverses the border of these lots, I have personally observed it
to be a vital wildlife corridor for most of our native species, including the endangered Northern
Spotted Owl, and neighbors have even spotted a mountain lion every few years or so. The trail
is maintained by neighbors in terms of clearing brush and annually cutting down long grasses
adjacent to the trail, reducing fire hazards. The trail is already well known to the
neighborhoods, and the posting of signs designating the entry should not appreciably increase
traffic. The existing open space does not receive any maintenance (to our knowledge) from the
city, and thus the addition of these two parcels should not add any maintenance costs to the
City. Residents stay on the developed trail, so there should not be any significant liability from
the property addition, as it is too steep for people to hike casually.
This seems to be a tremendous.win/win, allowing the City to protect a historic trail and add to
existing open space with no acquisition cost. Please approve and accept these lots and augment
the Open Space while we have the chance to preserve a few more acres from development,
protect a beloved local walking trail, and help preserve habitat for San Rafael's wild residents.
Sincerely, Susanne Lyons
Resident of Upper Toyon (adjacent to Open Space) President of the Board, WildCare
15. Email Address
Send To
Community5ervices
Please enter your questions/comments below
Save the greenwood trail!! We have lost so much history, particularly in San Rafael. We need to hold onto a trail used
by so many and with such historical relevance. I urge you to demand Marin County take on the responsibility of the
3.1 acres of property to protect the Greenwood Trail from development.
6
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2016
1. Hello,
I'd like to add my request to please help us keep our wonderful trail and access to our open space open and
available to all. This is such an important and historical community resource, and helps keep our neighborhood and
its residents, both human and canine, healthy, happy, connected, and able to avail ourselves of our beuwitful
surroundings.
Thank you for your consideration.
Marney Craig
Gerstle Park Homeowner and Resident
2. Hi Paul,
I am a long time resident of San Rafael, I remember when the Montecito Shopping Center was a yacht harbor and I
remember the beautiful old court house on Fourth Street. A lot has changed over the years in San Rafael, some are
not to my liking, but others have been an improvement like the revitalization of Fourth Street and the creation of
city owned open space around Gerstle Park.
The City of San Rafael has a rare opportunity to obtain property that includes part of the Makin Grade Trail. This
trail is a vital link to access existing City of San Rafael open space and provides residents the opportunity to enjoy
this historic area. I am one of the many people that use this trail on a daily basis and It would be a tragedy for San
Rafael to lose this resource.
I encourage you and the City Council to approve the acquisition of these two lots.
Sincerely Dr. Donald Guttman
3. * Please enter your questions/comments below
Hello,
I'd like to add my request to please help us keep aur wonderful trail and access to our open space open and available to all. This
is such an important and historical community resource, and helps keep our neighborhood and its residents, both human and
canine, healthy, happy, connected, and able to avail ourselves of our beuwitful surroundings.
Thank you for your consideration.
Marney Craig
Gerstle Park Homeowner and Resident
4. This letter is a request that the commission accept the offer of 3.1 acres at the end of Greenwood Avenue. If the
property is allowed to be developed the neighborhood of Gerstle Park will be permenantly cut off from accessing the existing
30 acre open space above.
We, the citizens of San Rafael, will lose the very historic stagecoach road that many believed to be part of the open space for
many years. Please approve the addition of this small parcel to the city's open space. Leslie Simons
5. Hi Guys,
We just moved up to Clorinda and find that the area doesn't have quite the walking paths/loops that
some of other places in Marin/San Rafael have, considering it's also a fairly dense population group in
the area (although quite a fun one), it would be great to persist a walking loop by joining the open space
up in that area together. I would also assume if the loop doesn't exist, that there's a potential for usage
of the remaining land to decrease and potentially be more of a liability to the city as it would get (I think)
a lot less usage at that point from residents.
I hope you can definitely consider the proposal to include the parcels in an open space strategy,
although new to the area, we've already started walking the loop :)
'thanks,
Robyn Battle San Rafael, CA 94901
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR —SEPTEMBER 13, 2016
1. Please help us preserve access to our wonderful Open Space by protecting forever the historic and beautiful
trail on Greenwood. The historical significance, the sense of community and camaraderie it fosters In this lovely
outdoor space, the easy access for both our human and canine residents, and the protection of this parcel from
future development will have a huge impact an our neighborhood and the city now and forever. Many of us use the
trail on a daily basis and the privilege of having access to nature so close by is something we all treasure and
appreciate as one of the great benefits of living here.
That someone is willing to buy the land to preserve it is truly a wonderful gift and a special opportunity for all of us. .
We sincerely hope you will accept this generaus offer,
Thank you for your consideration, Marney Craig
2. Makin Grade Trail - please keep this trail open for public use and available to hikers. Itis a beautiful trail and
pari of San Rafael history. Please do not sell it to developers who will take the trail away. Sherry Jacobs
Regarding saving (Makin Grade Trail: I am a 100% supporter of efforts to save the historic Makin Grade Trail -- the old
stagecoach trail which now extends through private property from Greenwood to the ridge top of Makin Grade and
Upper Toyan! 1 use the trail weekly, a connector to several existing loop trails up to the ridge line, through Gerstle
Park and even extending beyond Wolfe Grade. I beg the City of San Rafael to purchase this land and add it to the
existing Open Space preserved land, for current and future residents of our fine community. It would be tragic if the
City cannot step up and honor its responsibility to preserve this beautiful and secluded (short) stretch of our shared
history which otherwise will be lost to future generations as private ownership will surely result in its demise. I'm
sure that resources can be mustered for the relatively easy maintenance that this trail will require, and count me in if
the City needs local citizenry to help with maintenance! Kark Weigl
3. Please approve the acquisition of the Open space access on Greenwood Ave! This trail is.used all day ever`/
day by many appreciative residents of Gerstle Park and San Rafael. The trail requires very little maintenance and I
believe the value of maintaining this green space is well worth the benefits to the city of San Rafael. Carol abrahams
8
4. Dear Council and Park & Recreation Commission. For the past 25 years, I have been living in and enjoying the trails
and nature that make Gerstle Park such a wonderful place to live and hike.
Please vote Yes to acquire the Makin Grade Trail. Thank You.
Thomas Buttner
San Rafael, CA
We are urging the City to accept the gift of 3.1 acres of open space at the end of Greenwood Avenue.
Keeping trail access to existing open space makes sense, and keeping our history makes even more sense.
Vicki and David Sievers
San Rafael residents since 1980
6. Please accept the gift of the 3.1 acres at the end of Greenwood Avenue! Keeping trail access to existing open space
makes sense, and keeping our history makes even more sense.
Thank you from a local Marinite and avid hiker. Sophie Fleming
I am unable to attend the Thursday hearing on the potential addition of 3.1 acres on the Makin grade to city open
space in Gerstle Park, so I would like to share my comments on the proposal via email.
The parcels the Marin Open Space Trust (MOST) is in the process of acquiring are currently being used as open space
though they have not been formally designated. These parcels would be adjacent to existing open space areas on the
hillside. The loss of the parcels as open space would block public access to existing open space areas, and cut off a
widely enjoyed trail route in the neighborhood.
In addition, the parcels would improve the existing open space's value for wildlife by increasing the area of connected
habitat on the ridge. A "Wildlife corridor" is a habitat linkage that joins two or more areas of wildlife habitat, allowing
for movement from one area to another. It is state policy in California (AB 498, signed in 2015) to promote wildlife
corridors and encourage voluntary efforts to protect their functionality. The state bill (written by our Assemblyman,
Marc Levine) describes how habitats critical to the state's natural diversity are in danger of being lose, and
connectivity between wildlife habitats is vital to preserving biological diversity.
The UpperToyon area adjacent to the open space contains a nesting site of the federal and state threatened northern
spotted owl. The US Fish and Wildlife Service map of northern spotted owl range extends from Washington state
south to Marin County -- so this nesting pair is at the southern end of its range. The species is vulnerable to human
disturbance and we are fortunate to have a nesting pair in the city. In addition to the spotted owl, San Rafael open
space is used by bobcat, mule deer, coyote, gray fox, many species of migratory birds, wood rats and other small
mammals that serve as prey to spotted owls_ Maintaining the area of habitat open to these species increases the
likelihood that they will continue to forage and make homes here.
In accepting the wonderful gift of this open space from MOST, the City of San Rafael has an opportunity to combine
preservation of a unique historic resource with preservation of an important link to existing open space for the
benefit of people, the benefit of wildlife, and the benefit of our sense of history. Liza Wozniak
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SEPTEMBER 15 THROUGH 18, 2016
1. Dear Mr. Schultz,
159
Here is our support of the inclusion of Makin Grade, San Rafael, into open space. I wrote this
piece about six years ago and have updated it to fit what we trust will be an affirmative vote
from City Council.
Thank you for reading and dispersing to City Council members.
Best wishes,
Christie Nelson and Ron Moore . San Rafael, CA 94901
Dear City of San Rafael: I am a longtime resident of San Rafael, and one of the things I love most
about my community is the easy access to natural beauty and open space. My wife and 1 bought
our home on Miramar Avenue in the Gerstle Park neighborhood in 1994. We are avid hikers,
and we especially love taking the loop from our house, either up Clorinda Street, through the
open space and Upper Toyon and back down Greenwood Avenue, or in the other direction, up
Greenwood, through the open space, and back down Clorinda.
We are extremely fortunate to have open space like this in our neighborhood, and even luckier
that the owner is willing to donate the land to the city to keep it undeveloped forever.
In Mill Valley, the city has made its lanes and stairways a hallmark of the community, with
special signs alerting walkers to secret pathways. Many of these have been lost in San Rafael.
My former neighbors, the Claxon family, bought a city path or easement that ran between our
houses in the 1950s, which once connected Miramar Avenue with Woods Street. That is now
private property. On another junction, near one of the spots where Miramar and Miraflores
avenues intersect, a stairway once connected our hillside neighborhood with Second Street, but
that has been closed since before I bought my home. No doubt the stairs are expensive to
maintain and insure, but closing them also takes a little piece of the fabric out of the community
as well -- and also eliminates a safe route off the hillside in the event of fire or other calamity.
I don't know the exact costs of insuring or maintaining the Greenwood open space if this land
becomes city property, but as a San Rafael taxpayer, I believe it is worth the cost, as giving it up
carries a cost as well. I also agree with the gentleman who spoke at the City Council meeting and
posited that the city might face increased liability if it turns down the land offer and cuts off
access to its existing open space, forcing people into unsafe routes.
I will add that I am grateful the city and its staff are considering all issues and ramifications
around this land transfer. I would love to see the next step occur and have the city establish an
open space management plan.
Thank you for your consideration. Dan Fost San Rafael, CA
10
3. Hugo -I am not returning to the office until the 26th. Carlene McCart is finalizing the Council
report so I am copying her. All correspondence should go to the City Clerk (copying Esther too).
Paul
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:26 PM -0400, "Hugo & Cynthia Landecker"
wrote:
Never too late. They will include all new info up to the last minute. You can send to Paul
Jensen.
Paul Jensen M Thanks, Hugo Landecker
On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:55 AM, Dan Fost wrote:\\
Hugo: Thanks for the update. I cannot attend tonight's meeting. Is it too late for letter writing?
Who should I write to? best,Dan
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Hugo & Cynthia Landecker wrote:
Good morning, Important Meeting Tonight
I hope to see you tonight (Thursday) at the meeting of the San Rafael Park and Recreation
Commission. From 7 to 8 PM they will have a public hearing regarding the City acquisition of 3.1
acres that includes part of the historic San Rafael to Bolinas Stage road. The most important
thing to consider is that there will be no cost to the City. This is a win-win for the community
and the City. It doesn't get any better than this. The Commission will make a decision on this
important acquisition to the City Council and on Oct 3 the subject will again be heard before the
City Council for a final decision.
Another point that has not been discussed before is access to existing open space (adjacent to
the 3.1 acres) by the Fire Department in case of need has not been mentioned. By not acquiring
the land and assuming that at some time in the future that the lands will be developed with
homes, the access will most likely be hindered by a gated access.We need your presence at this
important hearing.
4. * First Name this is an email in support of the addition of open space that is being proposed in Gerstle Park
Josh Powel
Community5ervices
* Please enter your questions/comments below
This is an email in support of the addition of open space that is being proposed in Gertle Park.
5. I am a Gerstle Park resident who uses the open space for walking almost every day. I think the value of connecting
already existing pieces of open space with a path is a no-brainer. Especially since it is being generously offered to the
city at no cost. Furthermore, how is the fire department supposed to protect the city's investment in land without
11
good fire road access.
I urge you to do the right thing and recommend that the city annex this gift of land.
Thank you, Laurie Oman
5. 1 support the city accepting the donation of the Makin Grade property. I hike the trail all the time with my family and
it would be a sharne to let such an opportunity to acquire this property go to waste.
While the hiking is great, my main concern is fire danger. This road gives the city access to better protect our
neighborhood if there was a fire on the other 30+ acres that is already city owned. Christa Gatewood
12
To: San Rafael City Council Members September 16, 2016
Re: Makin Grade
Fr: Christie Nelson,
Gerstle Park hikers and dog walkers know the trail called the Makin Grade. The shady
route beckons at the upper end of Greenwood Avenue and zigzags up through the cool, mossy
woods. At the top when your feet hit the asphalt on Upper Toyon, you leave the only part of the
historic Makin Grade that has not been paved over.
What hikers may not know is that 130 years ago the Bolinas Stagecoach thundered down
this steep course onto Greenwood Avenue past the San Rafael Brewery on the final leg of a three
hour journey delivering vacationing passengers from Bolinas to the Marin Stables on 4`h and A.
There they bordered a train to Sausalito and then a ferry home to San Francisco.
In chilly rain or dusty heat, expert horsemen like Thad Lewis and Leonard Nott drove
two or four draft horses that pulled these heavy wagons bound with passengers and goods from
Bolinas to San Rafael over twenty miles of rutted road around treacherous turns and over twenty-
nine bridges. The journey took three hours; the fare was $1.50.
In 1878 the county paid Jesse Colwell and J.H. Wilkins of San Rafael $16,000 to build
the new route from Bolinas to San Rafael. Portions of the road were laid out along the old
Miwok Trail.
Today if you walk the Makin Grade, you're traveling in history, and please stop by to see
the only remaining building of the San Rafael Brewery at 119 Greenwood Avenue, the residence
of Fritz Goerl, Brewmesiter, that we call home.
Information retrieved from "The Bolinas Stage" by Brian K. Crawford httn://i�on�e.cumcast.nsr/-
crawl'ord.b/Css,ivs/Bot ina.cSta-,ehternl
The Bolinas Stagecoach on 4`h St., San Rafael
Marin County Genealogy Society
http://www.sfgenealogy.com/marin/0urtowns/ot—sr.htm
11 "
w � a
lvr
M
S
tea:
Esther Beirne
From:
Carlene McCart
Sent:
Monday, September 19, 2016 2:07 PM
To:
Esther 8eirne
Subject:
FW: San Rafael Contact Email - 9709858
From: Mary Ryan On Behalf Of Community Services
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 10:43 AM
To: Carlene McCart
Subject: FW: San Rafael Contact Email - 9709858
From: form enctinerc fs18.Formsite,ccm fmailto:form enaine(Clfs1S.form site, coml
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 9:24 AM
To: Community Services
Subject: San Rafael Contact Email - 9709858
San Rafael Contact Form
Thank you lily visiting the City al'San Rafael weh site. This lorlt is Intended for c'ommunic'ating with City ut' Sun Rafael staff. Your input will he
rorwarded to the appropriate stal't' nlemher for their attention during* regular busincrs hours. -
Note that the City of San Rafael comiders entail to stal'f as informal conutunication. Please send a signed letler if you prefer to nrl6c tour
coninleot/gUeSLion a matter of puhhc record. Niall lornlal letters Lo PO Box 151560. San Rafael. CA. 94915.
^° First Name
Laurie
* Last Name
Oman
Address 1
Address 2
City
San Rafael
State
CA
1
Zip Code
94901
Picone. Vumber
Enrtii address
tient! To
('onununityScrNices
::: Please enter )'our questions/coninvals below
I :an a Cicrstle Park resident who ttses the open space for walking almost e%cry day. I think the �aluc oCconnecting already existing pieces ofopcn
spacc with a path is a no-hrainwe, Espcci:dly since h is Iming generfwsly offered to the city at no cosi. Funhcrnnum how is the My department
suppotied ut protect the site's inxatment in land willwut good fire road accca.
I ur:eyou In do the right Ming wW recommend that the city annm Tk OR uC land.
'1 hank )vu. (,aurin Oman
Esther Beirne
From:
Carlene McCart
Sent:
Monday, September 19, 2016 2:07 PM
To:
Esther Beirne
Subject:
FW: San Rafael Contact Email - 9709858
From: Mary Ryan On Behalf Of Community Services
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 10:43 AM
To: Carlene McCart
Subject: FW: San Rafael Contact Email - 9709858
From: form enaineWslS.formsite,com jmailto:form engine@fs18.formsite.coml
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 9:24 AM
To: Community Services
Subject: San Rafael Contact Email - 9709858
ISan Rafael Contact Form
,.., # 1
3
a
a
Thank yuu I'ur visiting the City of San Ruldel weh site. This form k intended ror comnwnicaling with City ol'San Ruiael stal'I'. Your input will be
l'orWarded to the appropriate stal'I' memher for theirattentionduring regular huffiness hours.
Note that the City of San Rafael cunsiders email to stul'I' as iniorntal communication. Please send a signed letter if' you prefer to Mahe your
comment/question a mutter of public record. Mail formal letters to PO Bu-% 151500. San Rarael. CA, 94915.
First Narne
Laurie
" Last Name
Oman
Address 1
N�m
Address 2
City
San Rafael
Slate
CA
1
Zip Code
04901
Phone number
7"11=
Send To
f.'onunu nil yservice'.
Please enter your questions/comments below
I am a (persue Park rc%ident who uses the. open space fat walking almost every day. 1 thunk (lie value of connecting aL-eauh CXitium, piccc4 of opu:n
space Willi a path is a no -blamer. F"11ccially since it is bein,t generously offered to the city at no cost. Purt.hu-ntore. how is the lite department
tiupposed to prolccl the city's inresuncnt in land withoul ��ood lire road access.
I tree you to do the 6011 lhinL, .mil recomrnend thus the city annex this ;;ifl of lnrld.
1'h:mk yuu. i.auric Unt:m
September 1, 2016
SAN RA.FAEL HERITAGGE
IPQOI�?
127 San Rafael Avenue
San Rafael, CA 94901
I III W[GI��[GI7�1�:1�
BOARD OF DIRECTORS, SAN RAFAEL HERITAGE,
IN SUPPORT OF ACCEPTANCE OF AN OPEN SPACE DONATION
FROM MARIN OPEN SPACE TRUST
At the meeting of the Board of Directors of San Rafael Heritage on August 17, 2016, the
following resolution was proposed and unanimously approved by a vote of the board:
Resolved:
WHEREAS the mission of San Rafael Heritage is to promote the preservation of San Rafael's
historic and architecturally significant resources, and
WHEREAS the City of San Rafael municipal code calls for "the protection, enhancement,
perpetuation and use of...sites and areas that are reminders of past eras ... important in
local. ..history", and
WHEREAS a significant part of Makin Grade, the last unpaved portion of the historic San
Rafael-Bolirm stage route in San Rafael, could be preserved in perpetuity for the edification,
enjoyment, and use of the citizens of San Rafael, therefore
The San Rafael Heritage Board of Directors urges the San Rafael City Council to accept the
generous gift to the City of San Rafael of 3.1 acres of open space at the end of Greenwood
Avenue by Marin Open Space Trust, at no cost to the City.
Cynthia Landecker
President, San Rafael Heritage
www.sanrafaelheritae Member, National Trust for Historic Preservation 415 456-0221
Esther Beirne
From: Paul Jensen
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 12:06 PM
To: Hugo & Cynthia Landecker; Dan Fost
Cc: Carlene McCart, Esther Beirne
Subject: Re: Gerstle Park --Open Space, Saving Makin Grade Trail
Hugo -I am not returning to the office until the 26th. Carlene McCart is finalizing the Council report so I am
copying her. All correspondence should go to the City Clerk (copying Esther too). Paul
Get Outlook for iOS
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:26 PM -0400, "Hugo & Cynthia Landecker"
wrote:
Never too late. They will include all new info up to the last minute. You can send to Paul Jensen.
Paul Jensen <
Thanks,
Hugo Landecker
On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:55 AM, Dan Fost wrote:\\
Hugo:
Thanks for the update. I cannot attend tonight's meeting. Is it too late for letter writing? Who should I write to?
best,
Dan
Dan Fost
0
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Hugo & Cynthia Landecker wrote:
Good morning,
Important Meeting Tonight
I hope to see you tonight (Thursday) at the meeting of the San Rafael Park and Recreation Commission. From
7 to 8 PM they will have a public hearing regarding the City acquisition of 3.1 acres that includes part of the
historic San Rafael to Bolinas Stage road. The most important thing to consider is that there will be no cost to
the City. This is a win-win for the community and the City. It doesn't get any better than this. The Commission
will make a decision on this important acquisition to the City Council and on Oct 3 the subject will again be
heard before the City Council for a final decision.
Another point that has not been discussed before is access to existing open space (adjacent to the 3.1 acres) by
the Fire Department in case of need has not been mentioned. By not acquiring the land and assuming that at
some time in the future that the lands will be developed with homes, the access will most likely be hindered by
a gated access.
We need your presence at this important hearing.
San Rafael Park and Recreation Commission
1400 Fifth Avenue (City Hall)
City Council Chambers
7 PM
Hugo Landecker
iI• yOu M,-GcE:stic 1''.71°k --appal space- c.� ll IiK
llolil"y witli the wm(J,, "Renu ve; I'n.,m-i Gerstie 1' irk--opcn spree entails" in the
q� el�
Mt�R1N ��
CONSERVATION
LEAGUE
September 13, 2016
San Rafael Parks and Recreation Commission
c/o Carlene McCart, Community Services Director
618 B Street,
San Rafael, CA 94901
By e-mail: carlene.mccart@cityofsanrafael.org
Subject: Greenwood Avenue Lots — Offer of Dedication for Open Space
Dear Chairperson Ralph Mihan:
The purpose of this letter from Marin Conservation League is to support the recent offer of
Dedication of two vacant lots at the end of Greenwood Avenue to the City of San Rafael for
permanent open space. Marin Conservation League's Parks and Open Space Committee recently
heard a presentation from representatives of Marin Open Space Trust, who are facilitating the
dedication and transfer of ownership to the City. We have also reviewed the September 6, 2016
Council Agenda Report and visited the property. In light of this review, we believe that the City
would miss an important opportunity if it turned down the generous offer.
Since 1934, MCL has consistently led efforts throughout Marin to preserve open spaces and, in so
doing, ensure that diverse natural habitats are protected and that community resources for the
enjoyment of present and future residents are preserved. Over the years, an incomparable wealth
of parklands and open spaces in the County has evolved. In many instances, this has resulted
from the incremental addition of small, strategically located areas of land that have been acquired
as circumstances permitted. The three -acre Greenwood Avenue property is not only strategically
located contiguous to the existing Oakwood Open Space, but it also contains a segment of the
historic Makin Grade and it provides useful trail connections between neighborhoods.
Timing is important! Two residents have offered to meet the acquisition price, leaving no
obligation to the City to raise additional funds. MCL understands why the City established a policy
some years ago not to accept offers of land for permanent open space. However, this property
presents compelling reasons to accept this offer. Notably, it meets many of the criteria for open
Morin Conservation League / September 13, 2016
Greenwood Avenue Lots -Offer of Dedicotion for Open Space
space preservation outlined in the San Rafael General Plan 2020. These include, among others,
preserving open space as wildlife habitat and as a visual asset for the community (Policy OS -1);
encouraging open space areas that are adjacent to public open space (Policy OS -1b); protecting
and preserving the natural value of open space while permitting it to serve as a community
resource for enjoyment by residents of San Rafael (Policy OS -3); and encouraging provision of
access to open space areas in the design of adjacent development (Policy OS -4).
MCL asks that the City fairly assess the limited liabilities inherent in adding these three acres to
30+ acres of existing contiguous open space. Furthermore, MCL encourages the City to move
toward fulfilling the General Plan's goal of developing a management plan for the approximate
10,000+ acres of open space that it already owns (Policy OS -2a). In the meantime, MCL urges the
City to accept this offer!
Sincerely yours,
Kate Powers
President
cc San Rafael City Council
adv—pos_GreenwoodAve_Ded iotionOffer_md_2016.09.13.pd f
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PHONE: 415485-3333
FAX: 415-485-3186
DATE: September 20, 2016
SUBJECT: Greenwood Avenue Lots - Offer. of Dedication (APNs 012-320-01 and 10)
Dear Resident,
On September 6, 2016, the San Rafael City Council reviewed a proposal made by Marin Open Space
Trust to dedicate in fee two vacant residential parcels at the terminus of Greenwood Avenue to the
City of San Rafael. The subject properties represent approximately three acres between Greenwood
Avenue and the existing City -owned Oakwood Open Space.
The matter was continued to the Monday, October 3, 2016 the City Council meeting at which time
the City Council will act on to the matter. The video and staff report from the September 6th
meeting can be viewed at www.citvofsanrafael.org/meetings by clicking on "City Council" under
"Archived Video's" and then navigating to the "September 6 "meeting and clicking on "video" and
then clicking on Agenda Item #5.b.
You are invited to attend the October 3, 2016 City Council meeting at 7 p.m. at San Rafael City Hall,
1400 Fifth Avenue. A staff report for the October 3rd meeting will be available on line (after
September 29th) by navigating to the above web site, clicking on the "agenda" link for the October
3rd City Council meeting and then clicking the staff report link for this specific agenda item
If you have additional questions about this project, you may call me directly at (415) 485-3340.
You may send comments and/or concerns about this dedication in writing to:
Esther Beirne, City Clerk
1400 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, CA 94903
citvclerk0citvofsanrafael.orey
As a neighbor to these properties, your input is valuable to the decision making process.
If you sent correspondence previously on this issue, it remains in the record for City Council
consideration on October 3.
Sincerely,
/s/
Carlene McCart
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Community Services Director
1400 FIFrH AVENUE - PO Box 151560 • SAN RAFAEL, CA 94915-1560
WWW . C ITYOFS A NRAFA E L.O RG
ATTCHNIENT 6
MOST Response to City Council
Hoard Members
Bill Long, Chair
David Hansen, Vice Chair
Halnh Mihan, Secretary
Ann Thomas, Treasurer
Joyce Applen, Member
Jonathan Braun, Member
Don Dickenson, Member
James Schutz
City Manager,
City of San Rafael
1400 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, CA 94901
September 12, 2016
Re: Proposed Donation of the Greenwood/Makin Grade lots
Dear Jim
On September 6 the City Council received an informational briefing on the proposed donation
by the Marin Open Space Trust of the two lots at the end of Greenwood as an addition to the
City's existing Open Space.
The donation would be at no cost to the City. The funding for the acquisition is being provided
by two very generous neighbors and MOST would assume the closing cost.
During the discussion by the Council, inquiries were made as to whether there were other
alternatives to preserving the lots for public use and benefit without the City taking ownership.
MOST took the inquiry seriously and explored several possibilities. Attached is a summation
of them for the City's consideration.
MOST is not aware of any feasible alternative to the City's taking ownership.
MOST trust that the City will take title and add the two lots to the City's existing Open Space
lands.
Thank you.
Don Dickenson, MOST Board Member
cc
Paul Jensen, Director of Community Development
Carlene McCart , Director of Community Services
Bill Long, Chair, MOST
Ralph Mihan, MOST Board Member
www.marinopenspacetrust.oxg
415-884 2270
P.O. Box 4133
San Rafael, CA 94913
nSA,.J2"-N'G y"2iNj72d a (jt'.,.a^_E: T vRR.0 "
ADVISORY CCULUCIL
Al Boro
Al Baumann
Barry Spitz
Connie Berto
Dan Rheiner
Dennis Scremin
Douglas Ferguson
Frac: Brigmanr_
Gail Wilhelm
Gary Giacomini
Jared Huffman
Jean Starkweather
Jeff Saperstein
.red Kanter
Samaria Jaffee
John Leonard
John Levdecker
Kon Miska
Liza Crosse
Karen Wilson
L. Martin Grif=fin
Leland Jordan
Linda Novv
Michael Dvbeck
Mimi Nelaton
Patty Garbarino
Sharon McNamee
Susan ives
Susan Stompe
George Brewster
Tom Forster
Terry Toner
Makin Grade/Greenwood Ave Lots
Alternatives to the City taking fee title
- aurin Open Space Trust (IMOST) taking title
MOST is not a land managing entity
MOST will not take fee title to the lots in order to either
- grant a trail easement to the City, or
- manage the lots long term with an easement for public use.
- Have the lots transferred to another entity for long term opera space
ownership
The County Open Space District is not interested.
There is no other known entity that will take long term ownership
of the two isolated lots.
- Donors taking fee title and granting a trail easement to the City.
The funding donors do not want to take title as private citizens. They
have no interest in owning the lots forever and paying property taxes,
liability insurance (or having any long term responsibility for the lots)
when the benefit of open space is clearly to the wider public.
- Creating an endowment to maintain the lots and cover all cost related to
them in the future.
That would require forming an entity to hold and administer the
endowment and funding such an endowment.
MOST will not raise the money for such an endowment nor administer
such an endowment.
- Defaulting back to the owner/seller
If the City will not accept the donation, MOST will withdraw its deposit
on its October 5t' contingency removal deadline, the lots will go back
the owner/seller and the lots will go back on the market for sale to a
developer. When sold the lots will eventually be developed and will
undergo major disruption and public access over the Makin Grade
Trail will be eliminated and the property will probably be gated.
- Have the donors take title, form a LLC, convey developments right to
MOST and grant the City a trail easement.
The Donors will not take title and form a LLC for personal protection.
They do not want to future tax liability for ownership of the fee title
and they do not want to the absorb the expense of forming an LLC.
They feel their donation of the money to purchase is enough.
MOST will not accept a donation of the development rights to hold
forever let alone assume any possible tax consequences.
ATTCHMENT 7
Minutes, Park and Recreation Commission Meeting, September 15, 2016
Pages 1-5
San Rafael Park and Recreation Commission
Meeting Minutes: September 21, 2016
Chair Ralph Mihan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. at San Rafael City Hall
Roll Call: Commissioners: Mark Bustillos, Eric Holm, Jeff Jones, Stacey Laumann, Mark Machado,
Ralph Mihan, Chair, Tom Obletz, Cicily Emerson, Alternate
Commissioners Present: Emmerson, Halm, Jones, Laumann, Mihan, Obletz
Commissioners Absent: Bustillos, Machado
Staff Present: Carlene McCart, Director, Community Services Department; Brendon Mitchel, Parks
Supervisor, Public Works Department
1. Action Items
A. Greenwood Avenue Lots — Offer of Dedication for Open Space
Due to conflict of interest as a current Board Member of MOST, Ralph Mihan recused himself from
this item discussion and left the meeting.
Director McCart introduced Brendon Mitchel, newly promoted Parks Supervisor and gave an
introduction to the first Agenda item.
The Oakwood Subdivision was recorded in 1987 at which time the developer donated 33 acres
within the Subdivision to the City of San Rafael for permanent Open Space. Of the original 47 lots
zoned residential, 45 of have been developed. The two remaining lots, Lots 21 and 22 are at the
end of Greenwood Avenue. Combined they are 3 acres in size and contain several public
easements for utilities as well as a fire road. The lots separate Greenwood Avenue from the
Oakwood Open Space. The public utilizes the fire road to access the Open Space.
Marin Open Space Trust has proposed the City accept a donation of the Lots, in fee, to connect to
the existing City -owned Open Space, thereby preserving the access and land now in private
ownership. Two private donors will purchase the land on behalf of MOST who will immediately
dedicate the land to the City of San Rafael for designated Open Space.
She reviewed the proposal's consistency with the General Plan 2020. The lots are not on the list of
identified potential Open Space included in the General Plan, however the access to the Oakwood
Open Space is designated as the terminus on Greenwood Avenue. The lots meet the Preservation
Options criteria, and the Open Space Use criteria in the General Plan. It was noted the General
Plan refers to an Open Space Management Plan that has not been developed or implemented.
Currently the City has an unwritten policy to reject offers of land dedication in -fee. With no
management plan, or dedicated resources to support maintenance, security or liability connected
with Open Space, the City is limited to emergency response only on the existing 3,200+ City -owned
acres of Open Space. There is the potential for increase City liability and maintenance from
additions to the current inventory of Open Space. Land preservation currently is more commonly
achieved through easements over private property. City -owned land has been transferred to the
Marin County Open Space District when contiguous with its land holdings and significant to County-
wide use.
Park and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes
September 15, 2016
Page 2
Staff from the Police, Fire, Public Works, Community Development and Community Services
Department determined that accepting the offer is not consistent with current policy, however
accepting would not compromise that policy for the following reasons:
• The Lots are contiguous to the Oakwood Open Space
• The Lots provide access to the Oakwood Open Space
• The Lots represent only a 10% increase to the land already owned by the City of San
Rafael
There is City owned infrastructure (drainage) on site that currently receives annual maintenance
There will be an increase in the City's responsibility for vegetation and property management, at an
unknown but estimated minimal cost. Staff also recommended a public review process to assure
that residents affected by the transfer are informed about and accepting of the potential for
increased traffic, parking and use of the Oakwood Open Space.
The City Council heard the proposal as an Informational Item at their meeting of September 6.
Over 40 members of the public were in attendance and 11 spoke in favor of the City accepting the
donation. There was no opposition presented. Staff was directed to provide a Title Report indicating
clear title, a Soils Report, alternative ownership structures, ADA requirements and possible
resources with the gift for ongoing maintenance and liability costs. The City Council also requested
a review of the proposal by the Commission in a formal public meeting.
The Council deliberates the findings at their meeting on October 3. The proposal is valid through
October 5.
The Title Report was reviewed and deemed clear.
The Soils Report, prepared in 2002 indicated there are some areas of sluffing along the cut banks
of the graded trail, but not significant or critical. The potential for rapid slide movement and debris
avalanches associated with on small slide on Lott 22 is not high. The Public Works Director
suggests that the City can provide localized maintenance of the sluffed areas with periodic "touch-
ups," as necessary to ensure there is a clear water path on the upslope of the dirt road. The cost
of installing the debris flow catchment basin will far exceed its value as the greater slide area that is
upslope of these lots is on City -owned Open Space, where the City presently holds liability.
MOST responded to the Council inquiry regarding alternative ownership structures to the City
receiving full title. As an entity, MOST does not have the legal or organizational capacity to hold
title to the property. Marin County Open Space District is the only public agency equipped to do so,
but the subject properties do not meet its criteria. The donors of the subject properties are not
willing to take title due to the associated costs for taxes and liability. Other ownership models such
as assessment districts are not feasible for the small amount of land with limited public impact. No
organization has expressed a willingness to support the donation financially.
If the City is not prepared or willing to accept the offer of dedication from MOST in its current
structure, MOST will withdraw the offer. The subject properties will remain in private ownership
and are subject to development.
Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes
September 15, 2016
Page 3
It was determined that no ADA compliance issues are triggered by the acceptance of the properties
by the City.
At the conclusion of the introduction, the Commission members received confirmation that the City
is not required to make payment or incur other costs for the transfer of the properties. McCart
responded no financial resources were required, however staff resources are needed to prepare an
Amendment to the General Plan, administrate the title transfer and record the merge of the
properties into the Oakwood Open Space. Commissioner Jones asked if additional Police
Department resources will be needed to support the additional Open Space. The seasonal Park
Ranger is observing these properties currently as he conducts security periodic patrols of the
Oakwood Open Space. The Fire Department will continue to respond to calls for service as it does
now on public and private property.
Public outreach thus far has included notification of the parties involved, notification of residents
through the Gerstle Park Neighborhood Association website and e-mail distribution data base, and
notification of the City Council and Commission meetings, a total of three public hearings. The
Commission received all correspondence related to the proposal to date.
Commissioner Obletz commended the donors for the opportunity to preserve more Open Space for
the community.
McCart introduced Don Dickenson, member of the Board of Directors of MOST. Mr. Dickenson
explained the mission of MOST and the recent successful acquisitions of open space property
county -wide that MOST helped secure.
MOST was contacted by two potential donors interested in securing the two vacant lots in the
Oakwood Subdivision for inclusion in the Oakwood Open Space owned by the City. The price of the
two lots recently decreased to $730,000. The donors have made an all-cash offer for the lots,
secured with a $20,000 deposit, with a 90 -day contingency to confirm the City will accept in fee
title the properties and incorporate them into the Oakwood Open Space. October 5, 2016 is the
deadline to proceed with the purchase agreement or return the security deposit.
Dickenson went on to explain the City was the only appropriate entity for ownership. There is no
viable alternative for preservation of the properties. He confirmed that MOST cannot accept title,
that an LLC with dedicated property rights to MOST is not possible. If the proposal is unacceptable
to the City there is likelihood the lots will eventually be sold and developed resulting in no public
access to the Oakwood Open Space from Greenwood Avenue.
MOST proposes a simultaneous close of escrow to transfer the title to the City. This unique
opportunity is not common. Maintenance is performed now in the form of seasonal clearing of
water drainage and would not increase. The soils report on the properties indicate slight sloughing
which should not increase the existing liability for the Oakwood Open Space significantly, but if the
lots were developed for housing the City's liability might increase. He requested endorsement of
the proposal, and a recommendation to the City Council to accept the donation.
Obletz asked if an extension to the deadline was possible in the event the City Council could not act
on the proposal on October 3. Dickenson replied the 90 day contingency was an unusual offer by
the seller and the donors are unwilling to risk the deposit if the City Council cannot respond by
Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes
September 15, 2016
Page 4
October 3. The deal will take three months to consummate as the title transfers, the lots are
merged and the General Plan amended.
Obletz asked about the viability of an LLC holding title to the properties. Dickenson replied there is
no option to maintain a public right of way under an LLC due to the taxes and liability costs that
would be the responsibility of the LLC. The lots may be subject to prescriptive rights which would
be expensive to resolve, as would the issue of trespassing and probable gating of the access if the
lots were developed.
Vice Chair Holm opened the floor for public comment. Twenty-six were in attendance, 11
addressed the Commission:
Rodger Roberts, resident: The subject properties, at a total of 3 acres represent a 10%
increase in the current City owned Oakwood Open Space and less
than .010% of the total Open Space owned by the City so the
increase cost and liability is negligible. Support preservation of
historic lands that are consistent with the General Plan 2020
goals. Support the proposal.
Ron Moore, resident: The subject properties provide a well -used access to the Open
Space now. The site is of historical significance. Support the
proposal.
Gina Silvestri, President, Gerstle Park Neighborhood Association: The Board of Directors endorsed
the proposal in a letter to the Commission.
Cynthia Landecker, San Rafael Heritage: The Board of Directors sent a resolution in support of the
proposal for the historical significance of the site.
Tamara Peters, resident: Presented a petition with 137 signatures in support of the
proposal from people who use the site to access the open space.
Forty residents attended an informational meeting about the
proposal. Support the proposal.
Bill Carney, resident: The subject properties have habitat and environmental value,
historical reference, are consistent with General Plan 2020 criterial
for open space, ample parking, drainage infrastructure, and
represent a small increase in Open Space the City already holds.
The City is the appropriate owner. 45 letters of support have
been received for the proposal.
Leslie Simons, resident: Read an interpretive piece on the stage coach operation formally
on the site. Support the proposal.
Kay Powers, Marin Conservation League: MCL endorses the proposal
Hugo Landecker, GPNA and SRH: Fire Department supports the proposal. Volunteers have cleared
and cleaned the site for over 30 years and will continue to serve.
There are other Open Space lands less stable than the subject
Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes
September 15, 2016
Page 5
lots. His organizations sent out 550 and 190 emails of notification
respectfully.
Karen Blackwell, resident: The presence of the access to the open space is a quality of life
issue and the "perfect trail". Support the proposal
Judy Milani, resident: There is no community opposition to the proposal. Acceptance
will legalize the access to the open space. Support the proposal.
After public comment concluded the Commission had the following comments
Jones: Is parking an issue now? There are no reports of complaints. This is a great opportunity.
Obletz: The audience registered 11 positive comments and no opposition. The Commission only
has authority to recommend action to the City Council where the
final decision will be made.
Holm: Appreciates the generous offer from the donors and the assistance of MOST. The proposal
is a win-win for the City and community.
It was M/s Jones/Obletz to recommend the City Council approve the offer of dedication.
AYES:
Emmerson, Holm, Jones, Laumann, Obletz
NOES:
None
RECUSED:
Mihan
ABSENT:
Bustillos, Machado
Chair Mihan returned to the meeting for the remainder of the Agenda.
ROUTING SLIP / APPROVAL FORM
INSTRUCTIONS: Use this cover sheet with each submittal of a staff report before approval
by the City Council. Save staff report (including this cover sheet) along
with all related attachments in the Team Drive (T:) --> CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEMS 4 AGENDA ITEM APPROVAL PROCESS 4 [DEPT -
AGENDA TOPIC]
Agenda Item #
Date of Meeting: 10/3/2016
From: Paul Jensen, Carlene McCart
Department: Community Development, Community Services
Date: 9/23/2016
Topic: Dedication of Open Space
Subject: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF DEDICATION FROM MARIN OPEN SPACE TRUST (MOST) OF
TWO VACANT LOTS AT THE END OF GREENWOOD AVENUE, APNS 012-320-01 AND -10, TO
THE CITY IN FEE FOR PERMANENT OPEN SPACE; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY, ALL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO EFFECTUATE
SUCH CONVEYANCE; AND DIRECTING STAFF TO INITIATE CORRESPONDING
AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE
Type: ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance
❑ Professional Services Agreement ❑ Other:
APPROVALS
® Finance Director
Remarks: MM - approved 9/24 with minor edits and two comments on staff report
® City Attorney
Remarks: LG -Approved 9/26/16 with recommended revisions.
® Author, review and accept City Attorney / Finance changes
Remarks: All edits accepted with one exception. A formal Open Space Management Plan is
very different from directing City, or Measure A funds, into projects or maintenance needs on Open
Space. The City does not have an Open Space Management Plan. I did not include that edit.
M City Manager
Zai11MWi
FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
File No.:
Council Meeting:
Disposition:
Name: Pam and Leonard Patterson
Submitted: 2016-08-25 16:30:01 UTC
Message: We live just below the trail at the end of the cul du sac of Redwood Dr. Having walked this
nearby and wonderful trail many times, and knowing first-hand how others enjoy it, we support the
acquisition of the Trail by the City of San Rafael to keep it as open space.
Name: lames W. Schmidt
Submitted: 2016-08-28 18:53:01 UTC
Message: TO THE FULL SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL: This message is to strongly urge the City of San
Rafael Council to act affirmatively and accept the Marin Open Space Trust gift of monies and to
acquire/preserve approximately 3 acres of additional open space protecting the historic Make Grade
Trail between the end of Greenwood Avenue and Upper Toyan Rd. This small parcel is part of a
priceless, wonderful walking trail that interconnects existing open space lands above Gerstle Park and
upper Clorinda Road.
Name: Deborah Lennon
Submitted: 2016-08-29 17:22:22 UTC
Message: As a native of Marin I have watched the the open areas dimish, the housing expand, the traffic
become almost intolerable. Part of the attraction of our area is to be able to take walk in a natural area
without driving there. Although we have parks there are a lot of rules and regulations especially for
those of us with dogs. Please allow the area being offered by the Gristle Park Neighborhood to remain a
respite for our area Sincerely Deborah Lennon a San Rafael resident of 30 years
Name: Tom Heinz
Submitted: 2016-08-29 20:19:10 UTC
Message: Dear City Council of San Rafael,
I am writing to ask you to accept the gift of 3.1 acres of the old Bolinas stage trail near Greenwood. We
just recently moved to San Rafael and love it's walkable size and character. We discovered this trail
while poking around our neighborhood. We would really love it to become permanent as open space in
San Rafael.
Sincerely,
Tom Heinz and Denise Van Horn
Name: D Anna Rogers
Submitted: 2016-08-29 23:22:20 UTC
Message: Do let this purchase of the important and historic trail be accepted by the City. We will raise
the money!
Name: Joanne Ritter
Submitted: 2016-08-30 17:46:10 UTC
Message: Being able to hike in nature right from my neighborhood is one of the very best things about
living here. Accept the gift!
Name: Laurie Oman
Submitted: 2016-09-02 03:26:21 UTC
Message: I am 70 years old, a resident of San Rafael for the last 30 years and a DAILY user of this
wonderful trail that allows one to make a circular hike thru redwood groves, bay trees, deer and birds.
Please vote to acquire this property for the use of us city residents. It is a treasure! Thank you.
Name: Thomas Hogan
Submitted: 2016-09-02 03:55:16 UTC
Message: Hello All,
It has come to my attention the Makin Grade Trail at the end of Greenwood Ave is being consider for
possible development. I understand there have been private donations made to purchase the land and
donate it to the city to ensure it remains undeveloped open space for years to come. I heard the city is
resisting the donation so I thought I would take the time to help those in the city better understand how
this small patch of land has united a community.
I moved into my home at 15 years ago. Shortly after my arrival I was introduced to
this wonderful trail at the end of Greenwood Ave better know as Makin Grade Trail. Over the years the
trail has grow in popularity with dog walkers, elderly and families. It's been amazing to see how this
small patch of land turned I turned into a community center of sorts. It's united the neighbors in a way
not often seen in recent times. Often while in my yard I'll observe familiar faces of groups heading up
the the trail. I'd swear it gets more traffic than Gerstle Park!
I wish there was a better way to convey the importance of this trail to the community. If you were to
install a camera or two for a week I think you'd get an better idea. Hopefully you'll see a way to break
through the red tape and help these lots get converted to open space and preserve the trail for
generations to come.
Thanks,
Thomas Hogan
Name: Jenai Lane
Submitted: 2016-09-02 03:59:15 UTC
Message: I am writing as the owner of in Gerstle Park to let you know of the
importance of keeping Makin Grade Trail open for public use. This is a neighborhood trail that many
people use as a gathering place, recreational hiking area and dog walking. It is also part of a historic
area. This trail is linked to open space and provides a safe passage way to hiking the other trails. Please
do everything you can to protect Makin Grade Trail for the use of the residents of San Rafael. It is really
a community treasure that we cannot do without. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jenai Lane
Name: Megan McFeely
Submitted: 2016-09-02 16:32:42 UTC
Message: Dear Council Members,
I would like to sincerely request that the city moves to support the continued availability of the Makin
Grade Trail to the community. It is a beloved and much used trail where neighbors meet and enjoy the
outdoors.
Thank you.
Name: Ken Homer
Submitted: 2016-09-03 14:24:28 UTC
Message: Dear Council Members,
I am writing to you to urge you to please approve the addition of the two lots at the end of Greenwood
ave to San Rafael's open space. I have lived in Gerstle Park for over 25 years and I walk up Greenwood
and thence to Makin Grade regularly. As soon as you turn off Greenwood and begin to climb the hill you
are in a little sanctuary of quiet and beauty. To lose access to this would be a great loss for the
neighborhood and to future generations of walkers and hikers.
Thanks to MOST and the generosity of concerned citizens, the land has been purchased and is ready to
be donated to the City for preservation. It is difficult to think of reasons why the City Council would not
approve this gift.
I hope you will take the time to go and walk this trail and understand what is at stake and then to
approve the gift.
Thank you for your time and consideration
Name: Leslie Simons
Submitted: 2016-09-03 16:33:55 UTC
Message: Please accept the gift of 3.1 acres at the end of Greenwood Avenue as an addition to the open
space above. If these properties are allowed to go into private hands the access to the open space above
will be cut off from the valley below beginning with the Gerstle Park neighborhood. This is a very historic
road that should be preserved.
Name: Elizabeth Ridley
Submitted: 2016-09-05 18:09:19 UTC
Message: Dear Mayor and Council,
I'd like to voice my support for the City's acquisition of the two lots at the end of Greenwood so that
they can be preserved as open space for the community. My husband and I frequently use the trail and
appreciate the access it provides to the historic Makin Grade Trail. I agree with the Staff Report that
the acceptance of in fee title can have negative implications for the City, in this case, these implications
soom negl gib o In comparison to the valva to tho commun ty In malntain•rg this access. Thank you for
your consideration.
Name Danla' Sonnet
Submitted- 2016.09-D6 03:40:25 UTC
Message Dear City Councl ,
Pease accept the gift of 3 acres o= open space that includes the historic Makin Grade. The 3 acres seem
contlguous to existFng open space, so that the addltlanal milntananca and [ab[ associated with those
.acres viou`d be minima'.
This parte` has a cdarfuI and noteworthy historical con nect=an and wouId be a wonderful addition to
San Wool's open space.
Of course acceptance would be the right thing to do.
Thanks you for all you do for the city,
Dan lei Sonnet
San Rafael
Name KovIn Stockmann
Submitted: 2016.09.15 15:54:53. UTC
Message: Dear San Rafael park and Recreation Commission & City Council, Please acceptthe two Open
Space parcels at the end of Greenwood Avenue and peeservt this walking troll and natural area. I am a
property owner and business owner in downtown San Rafael. Walking on this tra.,l is something many
peopit treasure and It is good for the health and wall being of thea neeghborhood, This acquisetion will
not increase traffic, keeping this trail accessible keeps traffic doaun because we can walk Iflca'.ly rather
than drive across town to China Camp or Mount Tam. Thank you very much.
Name: Linzy Klumpp
Submitted: 2016.09-20 06:37:37 UTC
Message: Please vets to accept the 1,3 acres of land offered by the Barin Open Space Trust. Thrs small
parcel will enhance the city's history, recreational enjoyment and wildlife preservation, These benefits
certainly outweigh and negative consideratlons. Pleast accept this gift to the cay.
Flame: Brooke Hansen
Submitted' 2016-49-2915:01:52 UTC
Message: I am hoping the city will seize the opportunity to acquire this beautiful little trail, My dog and I
use It personal y sekeral days a week. We'd be heart broken If Chas easy access to the "woods" were to
be closed. It's a beautiful thing when cities have the foresight to preserve open space and keep their
commun tics connected to the outdoors,
Thank you
Name Leslls Simons
Submitted: 2016.09-30 17:48:37 UTC
Mtssage I am submitting the transcript of a short hlstory as given to the coun*I and comenrssson at
their September 6th and 15th meetings for inclusion in the packet
Name Emose Wood
Submitted: 2016-lD-D2 16:30:13 UTC
Message: I would like to urge tete Council to p easse aquire the two parcels of land being offered fo-
o pen space at the orad of Groanwood Ave. Thow parcels are of Immense natural, racroationa and
historic interest. This is a wonderful opportunity to acquire them through the Marin Open Space Trust
At no taxpayer axponm It is a boautifu. area where I hika often, Thank you for your consideration.
Namo Padma Rao
Submitted: 2016.lD-03 07:21:00 UTC
Messago dear C-ty Councl of $on Wool,
I am along time resident of Gersffe Park, lire lived at 259 Clorinda Ave for 38 years. I Notre our
nol,ghborhood and approciate the beauty, safety, and harmony horn,
It Is vory Important to me that the path at the, and of Greonulvod Avanuo rornA ns span for puWlc
access. F walk this path most mornings, rain or shine, for health reasons, ne ghborhaoad good wi I, and
my janeral we I b�oing.
P ease considerwell and approve access to this open apace remains accessible to all.
Thank you so much,
Padma Rao
Name: Patr"cia Roberts
Submlttotl 2016-1"3 19:42:06 UTC
Massage I I ve on Clorinda Atimia and enjoy the f oautlful woodland trail to access the City's axlst ng
open space. I strongly oppose the deve'opment of the tra 1, open space, and a p ece of h'story.
N armo Jason Chan
Submitted: 2016.1D -a3 20:53:113 UTC
M9ossage City Councll,
I am a resident of Gerstlo Park and utlllzo the Marlin O"m Space in our nelghborhood frequontly with
my family. I a`so run into fellow neighbors and atber GR residents al of the time enjoyringthese beautiful
for ast trails. This Is a very speclaI area for a`I of tlha GR rosidants, PLEASE da not devolop this area, It
ivould be very disappointing if you decided to do so.
Prosorve aur land IIII
Sincerely,
Jason Chan
October 1, 2016
Mayor Gary Phillips
City of San Rafael
1400 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, California 94901
RE: Makin Grade Open Space Addition
Dear Mayor Phillips and Councilmembers:
You've heard from many people the many reasons to accept this small addition to
the City's open space system. It's a beautiful property, replete with natural values
and historical significance, providing access to and contiguous with existing public
open space, all furthering the General Plan objectives that guide our community's
decision-making.
At least 175 citizens currently enjoying this land have petitioned the City to accept
MOST's gift. At least 45 have sent letters of support, including the Gerstle Park
Neighborhood Association, San Rafael Heritage and Marin Conservation League.
The owners of the three downslope properties that might be most affected by the
acquisition all concur with it, and two of them have signed the petition.
At Council's request, City staff has completed due diligence on a range of specific
questions and provided a comprehensive report on the transaction, along with a
recommendation for approval. Likewise, after careful consideration, the Park and
Recreation Commission unanimously recommends acceptance.
While providing important natural, historic, scenic and recreational benefit, the
addition of these three acres will increase the City's open space holdings (3,285
acres) by less than 1/1000t". Any increase in maintenance expense or liability
exposure would be likewise incremental and minimal. The City's "unwritten policy"
to privatize such open space responsibilities in new developments (or when new
capital expenditures are proposed) seems of limited use in this case, when land is
being added, at no cost, to an existing open space pursuant to the General Plan.
We trust that you will find, on balance, that the preponderance of public benefit
clearly leads to the City's acceptance of MOST's straightforward offer.
Sincerely,
Bill Carney and Tamra Peters
San Rafael, CA 94901
The Federation of San Rafael Neighborhoods
P.O. Box 151485
San Rafael, CA 94915-1485
To Mayor Phillips, Councilmembers Bushy, Colin, Gamblin, McCullough
Cc: Paul Jensen, Esther Beirne
It is my honor to speak on behalf of the Federation, an umbrella group of 12
neighborhood associations from the West End Neighborhood to the Lincoln/San Rafael
Hill Neighborhood.
Our leadership group listened as the Marin Open Space Trust lay out the proposed
donation of 3.1 acres to the City of San Rafael, to the City Council at the information
session, and to the Parks & Recreation Commission at their hearing. Upon considering
the far-reaching benefits of having a complete and historic trail in our City's Open Space,
the leadership completely endorses the acquisition of this land.
We are concerned about the current practice of trespassing across 3.1 acres of private
land to access the nature and wild spaces that neighbors value. We are concerned about
safety. If the City refuses the land offer, this private property will most likely be gated,
and subsequently the San Rafael Police Department and Fire Department will not have
access at Greenwood to the Gerstle Park Open Space in case of emergency. The City has
the opportunity to complete a job they began upon acquiring the initial property, and to
right a wrong --- trespassing upon private property to access a City trail, one of the City's
gems in Gerstle Park.
We urge you all to accept the generous offer of land, and if you do, to celebrate with us
do, that the residents of San Rafael will finally be able to finally legally access their trail
at the most vital access point.
Yours truly,
Likover
Interim President
Federation of San Rafael Neighborhoods
Cell:
Gerstle park open space dedication
Case tags
Greetings, I am writing to add my voice to the conversation regarding the opportunity to
Case tags
dedicated two vacant lots at Greenwood to the existing open space. As a local resident born
Makin Grade 't Open Space x
and raised in the area, and as a wilderness loving human, I am strongly in favor of this
Makin Grade Open Space
addition. I feel it of great import to preserve what undeveloped land we can and to steward it
Feedback
in such a way that the land itself and our generations to come will benefit. Thank you very
Assigned users
much. With heart, Adrienne Chow
Assigned users
Details
�1►
Case No 41538
Tasks
Status Open
This case has no associated tasks.
Priority n.'a
Constituents
Source Form
This case has no associated tasks.
Makin Grade Trail
Dear City Counsel,
Case tags
I'm writing to support the City's acquisition of 3.1 acres of land, consisting of two vacant lots
off Greenwood Avenue leading to Makin Grade. We are raising a family a block away from the
Makin Grade 't Open Space x
trail and our young children use the trail with us regularly on hikes. To small children, the
Feedback
woods the trail leads through is special and magical, with steep slopes, enormous trees and
boulders, sparking their curiosity, imagination and interest in nature. See attached where my
Assigned users
son (3) grabbed a stick to "fish" for leaves as he hiked the trail.
The Marin Open Space Trust (MOST) has been contacted by two private parties to assist
them in the acquisition of the two vacant lots. Following purchase of the property, MOST
Tasks
desires to transfer ownership of the lots to the City of San Rafael so that the lots can be
preserved as permanent open space, serving as an extension to the 30+ acre Oakwood Open
This case has no associated tasks.
Space. The transfer will not cost anything of the city and will preserve a vital touchstone to
the past.
Constituents
---
We support the acquisition as frequent users of the trail. Thank you.