HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Resolution 8323 (Masonry Building Program Services)follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 8 3 2 3
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF
AN AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CHECKING SERVICES -
UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDING PROGRAM
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL RESOLVES as
The DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS and THE CITY CLERK are
authorized to execute, on behalf of the City of San Rafael, an agreement with
Willdan Associates for structural engineering checking services as described in the
attached proposal, dated December 21, 1990; form of agreement shall be subject to
approval by the City Attorney.
I, JEANNE. M. LEONCINI, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted
at a regular meeting of the Council of said City on Monday, the 7th day of January,
1991, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Boro, Breiner, Shippey, Thayer & Mayor Mulrya
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
JE M. LEONC ' I, City Clerk
J
��
AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
FOR PROFESSIONAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
This Agreement is made and entered into this 7th day of January 1991 by
and between the CITY OF SAN RAFAEL (hereinafter called City) and WILLDAN
ASSOCIATES (hereinafter called Consultant).
A. SCOPE OF WORK
In accordance with this Agreement, the Consultant will provide
professional structural engineering services to review and check
engineering calculations and cost estimates submitted in accordance
with the City's "Unreinforced Masonry Ordinance", as outlined in the
Proposal from Consultant for the subject project, dated December 21,
1990, marked Exhibit "A", attached hereto, and incorporated herein
by this reference. The Consultant agrees to be available and perform
the work specified in this agreement in the time frame as specified
and as shown in Exhibit "N'.
B. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
It is understood and agreed that the Consultant is, and at all times
shall be, an independent contractor and nothing contained herein
shall be construed as making the Consultant, or any individual whose
compensation for services is paid by the Consultant, an agent or
employee of the City, or authorizing the Consultant to create or assume
an obligation for or on behalf of the City.
C. PAYMENT
For the payments specified herein, which the City agrees to make, the
Consultant will undertake the above noted work. Payment for
Professional Engineering services will be made as follows:
(1) The Consultant shall receive payment on a time and material
basis for services rendered in accordance with the rates shown
on his current fee schedule, set out in Exhibit "A".
(2) The total payment made for any individual work task will not
exceed the amounts shown on the Proposal Budget, set out in
Exhibit "A", without prior authorization by the City.
(3) Consultant's professional service fees shall be invoiced on a
monthly basis.
(4) Payments made by the City shall be made within 15 days of
receipt of invoice.
P y
ENGINEERING AGREEME1 • Page 2
D. TERM
The terms of this Agreement shall be from the date of execution to
December 31, 1991. Either party may terminate this Agreement by
giving other party thirty (30) days written notice. In the event of
termination, City shall pay Consultant all sums then due and unpaid as
of the date of receipt of notice. Payment by City of such compensation
shall be considered full and final settlement for all work performed by
the Consultant under this Agreement. All completed reports and
other documents and materials described in Exhibit "A" shall become
the property of the City.
E. ARBITRATION
All claims or disputes between the City and the Consultant relating to
this Agreement shall be decided by arbitration pursuant to the current
provisions of the California Code of Civil Procedure and any successor
statutes. The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on
the parties. In interpreting the provisions of this Agreement, the
arbitrator may make an award of costs and fees, including attorney's
fees necessitated by arbitration.
F. ALTERATIONS
This Agreement may be modified, as necessary, for the successful and
timely completion of the services to be provided. Any alteration shall
be expressed in writing, as an amendment to this Agreement, and
shall be executed by both parties. Amendments to Exhibit "A", may be
made by mutual agreement, in writing, signed by Consultant and the
Director of Public Works, or the Director's appointed representative.
G. ASSIGNMENT
No assignment of this Agreement, either in whole or in part, shall be
made by Consultant without the prior written consent of City.
H. NOTICE
Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall
be deemed to have been given when the same is sent by certified mail,
postage prepaid, addressed to the respective parties as follows:
City of San Rafael
Willdan Associates
Dept. of Public Works
141 Stoney Circle #260
P. O. Box 151560
Santa Rosa, Ca. 95401
San Rafael, Ca. 94915-1560
Attn: Mark Setterland
Attn: Fred Vincenti
ENGINEERING AGREEMEN i • Page 3 of 3
I.. INSURANCE
During the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain:
comprehensive general liability insurance with a combined single limit
of not less than $1,000,000 for bodily or personal injury or property
damage as the result of any single occurrence and $2,000,000 per
annual aggregate; Consultant shall also maintain professional liability
insurance with a limit of liability of not less than $500,000 per claim,
and in the aggregate. City shall be added as a named insured on the
general and comprehensive general liability insurance. Prior to
beginning work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide the
City with evidence that the insurance described above is in place.
J. INDEMNITY
Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from
and against liability arising from Consultant's negligent acts, errors, or
omissions in performance of the work, or for willful or intentional
misconduct relating to activities carried out pursuant to or in
connection with this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have caused their
authorized representatives to execute this Agreement the day and year first
written above.
ATTEST:
JE � NE M. LEON NI�-.�
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
GARY T. RAGGHIANT1
City Attorney
CIT SAN RAFAEL:
M. BERNARDI
Director of Public Works
CONSULTANT:
WILLDAN ASSOCIATESI
Attachment ( 1 ):
1. Exhibit "A" - Proposal from Consultant.
"roressionol Consulting Sen i.: es once No.
December 21, 1990
Mr. Fred Vincenti
Senior Engineer
Department of Public Works
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
1400 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, CA 94901
Subject: PROPOSAL FOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION OF URM
BUILDINGS FOR THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Dear Fred:
In response to your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal
to perform structural engineering evaluation review services to the
City for assistance in your development process for mitigation of
the hazards proposed by URM buildings contained within your City.
During the past two weeks, we have reviewed your ordinance, your
resolution, the inventory of suspected unreinforced masonry
buildings, and your request for proposal. In addition, we have met
and discussed with you and Mr. Lloyd Strom some specific issues
relative to this proposal. We have assembled a highly qualified
team of individuals and subconsultants to complete the plan review
and computer informational matrix development services as outlined
in your request for proposal.
We have prepared for your consideration, a proposal that describes
our understanding of the project and the key issues, a detailed
description of our proposed scope of services, a description of our
project team and management hierarchy, information describing our
qualifications and related experience, and a discussion about our
proposed fee structure.
We appreciate the opportunity to offer this proposal to your City
to provide structural analysis review services for the evaluation
of URM buildings contained within your City. Willdan Associates is
committed to providing a quality service to our clients. We
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 1 of 35
.1' 'I, CIRCLE • SUITE 26:1 9 SANTA ROSA CA 95401 0 (707) 542-6822 • FAX (707) 542-6830
Mr. Fred Vincenti
Page 2
December 21, 1990
encourage you to contact any of the references contained within
this proposal and to check on our past performance. If you have
any questions, please do not hesitate to'contact me. We look
forward to working with you to complete this important project.
Respectfully Submitted,
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
,411W A
MET WIRRI-4plaw—W.W1,' <
Mar:: Setterland, P.E.
Division Manager/Building Services
MS/arf
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 2 of 35
TABLE OF CONTENT1
PROJECT APPROACH
• Statement of Understanding
• Key Issues and Objectives
• Special Qualifications
SCOPE OF WORK
• Introduction
• Description of Services
• Time Estimate
• Conflict of Interest
• Additional Services Available
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
• Responsible Personnel
• Additional Support Staff
• Project Organizational Chart
• Resumes
RELATED EXPERIENCE
• General
• Specific Qualifications
• Relevant Projects
• URM References
• Statement of Qualifications - Assessment Engineering
• Public Finance References
PROJECT FEE
• Discussion of Fees
• Schedule of Hourly Rates
EXHIBIT "A" - Page 3 of 35
PROJECT APPROACH
Statement of Understandinq
In June of 1986, Governor George Deukmejian signed into law Senate
Bill 547, otherwise known as the Unreinforced Masonry Building Law.
This law requires cities and counties within California's Seismic
Hazard Zone No. 4 to do two things. First, they must inventory all
unreinforced masonry buildings in their jurisdictions; and second,
they must establish local programs to mitigate the earthquake
hazards in those buildings. This law also requires that jurisdic-
tions notify the owners of the potential hazards of these buildings
and establish a program to mitigate the hazards posed by these
buildings within their communities.
The City of San Rafael has completed the f irst major requirement of
this law - the inventory of all buildings within the City. As the
initial step in formulating a complete Hazard Mitigation Program,
the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1587 in May of 1990
requiring all owners of buildings identified under the inventory to
prepare an engineering analysis of the structure in accordance with
the criteria set forth in the Ordinance and a subsequent Resolution
numbered 8171. In addition to the engineering analysis, each
building owner was also required to prepare and submit a proposed
cost estimate for bringing the building into conformance with the
criteria contained in the Resolution.
The next step in this hazard mitigation process is to perform a
uniform and equitable review of the analysis and cost estimates to
develop demographic information into a comprehensive data base to
assist City Staff and the City Council in developing the second
phase of their Hazard Mitigation Program.
Rey Issues and Objectives
Following is a brief description of some of the key issues and
objectives that, we believe, must be given special attention in
order to ensure a successful project:
1. Consistencv,. In an effort to be fair and equitable to all
building owners, it is the City's desire that all review of
engineering analysis and proposed cost estimates be performed
by the same subconsulting firm using a consistent established
approach and identical criteria for each building.
2. Timeframe. It is important to the City Staff that the
timeframe allotted for completion of this project not be
excessive.
EXHIBIT "A.. 0 Page 4 of 35
3. Informational MF -ix. It is desired by t City that all
information obta...ed during the review process be collated and
collected into an electronic informational matrix with
subsequent reports that will enable the City Staff to develop
specific recommendations for proposal to the City Council for
direction in completing the Hazard Mitigation Program.
4. Review of Cost Estimates.. The potential cost of upgrading a
URM building could be staggering for many property owners. In
light of this, it is imperative that a responsible, realistic
review of proposed cost estimates be performed in order to
develop a level of confidence associated with the actual cost
for providing these retrofits for each individual building and
for the group of buildings as a whole contained within the
downtown area.
5. Conflict of Interest. In order to ensure that the structural
analysis reviews are conducted in an objective and equitable
manner, it is the City's desire that the consultant performing
these services not be employed or connected in any way with
any of the building owners or performing any private
structural design work to clients within the City of San
Rafael.
special Oualifications
Following are a few of the reasons, we believe, we are especially
well qualified to undertake this URM review project for the City of
San Rafael:
1. Staff Exnerience. Every member of our Building Services Staff
within the Santa Rosa office has experience relative to the
design of masonry buildings, the review of structural drawings
of masonry buildings, the development of URM Standards, the
inspection of URM buildings, or assistance in policy develop-
ment at the jurisdiction level. Two members of our staff
currently serve as Committee Members on the Hazardous
Buildings Subcommittee of the Seismology Committee of the
Structural Engineers Association of Northern California. This
is one of the committees that worked in consort with CALBO to
develop retrofit design standards for URM buildings that will
be contained in the 1991 Uniform Code for Building conserva-
tion. Two other members of our staff have been involved at
the staff level in various jurisdictions in the development of
URM inventory and mitigation programs. In addition, Willdan
Associates has retained an exclusive agreement with Mr. James
Russell, Building Codes Consultant. Mr. Russell is one of the
most knowledgeable and well known experts in the field of URM
Hazard Reduction Programs in the Bay Area today. In addition
to these credentials, our staff members have experience in
performing plan reviews on URM buildings both in the Town of
Corte Madera and in the City of Napa.
EXHIBIT "A" - Page 5 of 35
2. Turnaround Tir on Plan Reviews. We fee- we have sufficient
staff within c z Santa Rosa office and wi...i the assistance of
our URM Consultant to perform these plan reviews in a timely
equitable manner . However, if we do receive a large volume of
submittals at one time, we do have additional resources in our
Pleasanton office and in our Roseville office to assist us in
reviewing these submittals in a timely fashion.
3. Computer Support. Since Willdan Associates has a separate
Computer Support Division staffed primarily with programmers
and analyst specialists, we feel we can provide an electronic
informational matrix that is specifically tailored for this
project.
4. Conflict of Interest. Willdan Associates provides services
specifically to municipalities and other public jurisdictions
only. Neither Willdan nor any of its staff members currently
works for any private client in the general Bay Area or within
the city limits pf San Rafael.
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 6 of 35
SCOPE OF WORK
Introduction
Willdan Associates specializes in providing a full range of
municipal engineering, planning and building services. We serve
our clients through a network of 19 offices with a staff of over
630 employees. Our business approach is to tailor our services
specifically to the needs of our clients and to provide a great
deal of personal service. We believe we offer the most complete
and responsive Building Services available in California today. We
believe we can provide your City with URM plan review services that
meet your technical requirements as well as the scheduling require-
ments in keeping with the level of service goals that your City has
established.
Description of Services
It is our understanding that the submittals required by your
ordinance for the URM Program consists of the following:
1. A structural analysis performed by a licensed engineer or
architect outlining the existence, nature, and extent of
structural deficiencies within a building which could result
in collapse or partial collapse of the particular building.
2. Conceptual plans and details consisting of dimensioned floor
and roof plans, wall elevations, repair details and other plan
sections and details as necessary to complete the analysis.
3. Cost estimate of the proposed work to bring the structure in
conformance with the City's ordinance.
It is also our understanding that this plan review is not for the
purpose of obtaining a building permit and showing strict
conformance with the design provisions outlined in the resolution.
This submittal is intended to be a conceptual only submittal to
outline the nature and degree of problems within each building and
to develop a reasonable cost estimate associated with providing
this work.
Based on the above assumptions, our services under this agreement
shall consist of review of the submitted plans, structural
analysis, cost estimates and any other supporting data submitted
for conformance with the requirements outlined in the resolution.
In addition, we will collate and arrange the information for all
submittals into an information matrix on electronic form for
submittal to you for use in future decision-making processes.
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 7 of 35
The following is a mor detailed breakdown of our lope of Services
for each part of our c.-rvices:
A. METHOD OF CHECKING
1. Review of structural analvsis. We will provide a compre-
hensive review of the structural analysis submitted on each
individual project based on Sections III and IV of the
analysis and design requirements contained in the resolution.
This portion of the review will be performed by engineers
licensed in the State of California and experienced in
structural design provisions and the provisions contained
within your resolution. Each engineer will develop a
comprehensive checklist clearly identifying deficiencies in
the design procedure relative to specific sections contained
within the design requirements contained in the resolution.
2. Review of the conceptual plan submittal,. We will perform a
review of the submitted plans, details and specifications for
consistency with the structural analysis noted above and the
specific requirements contained in Section I of the
resolution. A detailed checklist will be developed for each
specific project indicating all deficiencies and requirements
based on the submittal and inconsistencies between the plans
and the accompanying structural analysis.
3. Review of the proposed cost estimates,. We will provide a
cursory review of the proposed cost estimates submitted by
each building owner. This review is not intended to be a
definitive support of actual construction costs, but a general
review based on consistency with the submitted structural
analysis and plans in order to establish a degree of
confidence or lack thereof in the proposed cost estimate.
B. INFORMATION MATRIX
1. Development of informational matrix. We will collate all the
information obtained from all the individual projects
submitted for review into a comprehensive, informational
matrix containing categories developed by our staff in
conjunction with recommendations and requirements of your
staff. These categories may include (but are not limited to) :
owner, AP number, occupancy classification, inventory number,
proposed cost, proposed cost per square foot, etc. This
matrix could be developed in many different forms using
various types of software available on the market today. We
would recommend that this matrix be developed using a
relational data base program supported with structured query
language to give the greatest amount of flexibility in dealing
with this informational matrix. Since we have a computer
support division in our corporate office, we have the
capability to provide this matrix on almost any type of
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 8 of 35
software curd `_ly available on the mar] : today. We will
develop this d«..a base matrix in such a manner that it will be
usable on a Macintosh Computer as required in your RFP. We
will work closely with your staff to develop this program so
that it is user friendly and easily accessible by any of your
staff.
We propose that the review portions of this, under Section A above,
be accomplished by providing an initial check to determine consis-
tency with the resolution, development of a subsequent checklist
outlining inconsistencies with the requirements in the resolution,
return of this checklist to the applicant, and review of his
resubmittal. After completion of this second review, we will list
all specific information relative to each individual project on
standard forms that we will develop for this purpose. The
information contained in these standard forms will be the
information we will include in the electronic informational matrix.
This will result in hard copies of information for each individual
project in addition to a micro -disc supported data base of
information relating all projects together.
Time Estimate
Based on the assumptions and the detailed breakdown of Section A,
noted above, we anticipate that plan review time for each specific
individual submittal will vary between 5 to 10 hours per submittal.
Depending upon the actual software program identified for use in
the informational matrix and what form the matrix may take, we
anticipate between 30 to 40 hours of time to program the matrix,
input the information, and develop and review all the reports.
Assuming timely receipt of all submittals from the City, we
anticipate that our internal staff can complete the initial review
of all 45 plus projects in approximately 6 to 8 weeks. We assume
there will be approximately 2 to 3 weeks turn -around time on the
applicant's part, and an additional 2 to 4 weeks for recheck of the
individual submittals. We assume the total timeframe for project
review to be approximately 3 to 4 months.
Initially, we plan to consult with the City to determine the
requirements and the structured form of the data base for the
informational matrix. We assume this form can be developed and
programmed within the first 4 months - concurrent with the actual
review process. After the review process is complete, it is
assumed it will take 1 to 2 weeks to input all the information into
the data base and to develop specific forms/printouts as required
by the City. Therefore, we estimate the total timeframe for
completion of this project to be between 4 and 6 months.
In the event that we receive several submittals in our office at
one time, we have various methods of handling the workload
anticipated. We may authorize overtime and weekend time for our
in-house staff to perform the reviews. We may decide to use
engineers in other Willdan Building Service Division offices such
EXHIBIT "A" - Page 9 of 35
as our Pleasanton off a or our Roseville offic( :o assist us in
the review of these submittals. Both options are available to us
and actual distribution of workload will be dependent upon actual
workload unrelated to the City of San Rafael's work in our office
in Santa Rosa at the time submittals are received.
Conflict of Interest
Willdan Associates does not provide building design services for
any public or private client. Furthermore, our office in Santa
Rosa is exclusively limited to providing services to, or on behalf
of, public entities. Neither Willdan Associates nor any of our
staff members are currently employed by anyone (including URM
building owners) within the City for the purpose of structural
engineering.
Additional Services Available
In addition to the work previously identified, Willdan Associates
specializes in providing public financing services to many juris-
dictions throughout the State. For this proposal, we have
identified a financing mechanism that would not only aid the
private property owner but also the City of San Rafael. We propose
that the City consider funding improvements for the seismic retro-
fitting of the buildings through the Mello -Roos Community
Facilities Act of 1982.
In the past, the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act has only
provided financing for public facilities. However, in August of
this year, Senate Bill 27 amending Section 53313.5 of the
Government Code (the Mello -Roos Act) was revised to permit
financing seismic improvements on public and private property. In
general, improvements necessary to bring buildings into compliance
with seismic safety standards or regulations, certified as such by
local building officials, may be financed. The only improvement
which would not be allowed to be financed by this act would be if
an existing building needs to be dismantled and a new building con-
structed.
Additionally, there is some information regarding this act that the
City should be aware of. With this act, there are special voting
requirements for this type of financing. For improvements on
privately owned buildings, 100% positive vote of those voting is
required and only the lots that the buildings are on may be
included in the district. It should be noted that a Mello -Roos
District could be formed for a single property owner if necessary;
however, the more properties involved in a district, the more the
process could be streamlined. Bonds issued for this type of
financing will not be exempt from Federal income tax, but may be
exempt from California State tax. The California exemption should
provide a favorable interest rate to the building owner and a new
source of funds.
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 10 of 35
Willdan Associates mr'ntains an excellent repu' :ion in helping
cities, counties anQ other jurisdictions formulate assessment
districts and facilities districts such as described above. We
would highly recommend that the City consider including this work
in the project if you consider it a viable financing mechanism. We
have included some of our relative experience in the formation of
Assessment Districts and Mello -Roos Districts in the Related
Experience section of this proposal.
In addition to assistance to the City in public financing
mechanisms for this project, Willdan Associates' Santa Rosa staff
and consultants are available to assist the City in its decision-
making process for further implementation of its Hazard Mitigation
Program. Such additional services may include assisting the City
Staff in developing Council Reports or presentations to clarify
and/or present the information contained in the informational data
base, development of additional information pertaining to or
comparing results of this initial survey in the City of San Rafael
with information developed and collated in other cities throughout
the Bay Area. We can also be of assistance to the City Staff in
researching, writing and implementing additional ordinances or
resolutions as desired by Staff or Counsel to define the next phase
of the City's Hazard Mitigation Program.
Willdan Associates Bay Area Regional Office also offers a full
service Planning Staff to assist local cities in planning issues.
Our Planning Staff, in addition to the Building Staff and
Consultants in the Santa Rosa office, are available to assist the
City in assimilating the information based on the URM Inventory and
Mitigation Program, and developing additional studies or reports to
be included in the general downtown area plan that the City is in
the process of developing.
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 11 of 35
PROJECT MANAGEME1
Willdan Associates can offer the City of San Rafael a highly
qualified staff to perform URM plan check and hazard mitigation
support. As noted previously, our staff combines individuals with
extensive experience within Building Departments relative to URM
inventory and mitigation together with individuals with substantial
design experience relative to the use of masonry as a structural
material. This combination will be very effective in meeting the
needs of the City in reviewing the URM hazard submittals and in
being able to work effectively with the City Staff to develop the
necessary information to present to the Council for their decision
making process.
Our approach in providing URM services to the City of San Rafael is
a team approach. Our team will include a Project Manager who will
be responsible for the overall management of the activities to the
City, a Supervising Engineer who will be responsible for the day-
to-day activities relative to the plan review, and a staff of
engineers who will actually perform the work. In addition, our
Consultant, Mr. Russell, will assist us in developing standard
guidelines and standard forms that will be used to put this process
together and to develop the subsequent informational matrix. After
the review process is complete and the informational matrix is
developed, our Project Manager and our Consultant will work closely
with the City to assist them in organizing the information and
developing a process for the Mitigation of Hazards for all of the
buildings contained within the City.
Resvonsible Personnel
Mr. Mark Setterland will be the responsible person for the overall
management of all services provided to the City of San Rafael. Mr.
Setterland is the Division Manager of Willdan's Building Services
Division in the Santa Rosa office. He is directly responsible for
the management of all services including structural, non-
structural, grading plan review, building inspection, and
administration. Mr. Setterland, a Registered Civil Engineer in the
State of California, is also a member of the Hazardous Buildings
Sub -Committee for the Structural Engineers Association of Northern
California. Mr. Setterland has had extensive design engineering
experience prior to joining Willdan, and is now one of Willdan's
most experienced staff members in the area of structural plan
checking. Prior to joining Willdan, Mr. Setterland worked as a
design engineer with a structural design firm in the Santa Rosa
area specializing in the structural design of large buildings,
including masonry structures. He has considerable experience in
performing building plan check services both with Willdan and prior
to joining Willdan, and has considerable familiarity with local
standards, conditions, and building design firms in the Redwood
Empire. In addition, Mr. Setterland has been extensively involved
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 12 of 35
in the State-wide effo` in the past few years to !velop specific
design and detailing s'Landards for URM retrofit procedures. Mr.
Setterland is also currently named as the Building Official for the
Town of Corte Madera where he oversees all building services to
that Town.
Mr. Mark Forrest. Mr. Forrest will be the responsible individual
to supervise and oversee the day-to-day operations in performing
the plan review portion of our services to the City. Mr. Forrest
is the Supervising Plan Check Engineer for Willdan's Plan Check
Service in the Santa Rosa Office. Mr. Forrest is a Registered
Civil Engineer in the State of California with extensive structural
design and plan review experience. Mr. Forrest is also a member of
the Hazardous Buildings Committee of the Structural Engineers
Association of Northern California. Mr. Forrest is the lead team
member in our office for structural plan review. Prior to joining
Willdan, Mr. Forrest worked as a project design engineer for a
structural and civil engineering firm in the Santa Rosa area where
his responsibilities included structural design, construction field
supervision and inspection for commercial, residential and school
buildings. He has extensive design experience in large buildings
including masonry structures. Serving as a member of the Hazardous
Buildings Committee, Mr. Forrest has considerable knowledge
relative to current design and retrofit standards for unreinforced
masonry buildings.
Mr. Kelly Johnson. Mr. Johnson is a Registered Civil Engineer in
the State of California with extensive structural and non-
structural plan review experience. Prior to joining Willdan
Associates, Mr. Johnson worked as a Plan Check Engineer with the
County of Sonoma. Mr. Johnson served as the Staff Engineer Public
Liaison Officer for the County of Sonoma's URM Inventory and
Mitigation Program. In this position, he was responsible for
advising all committee members on current legislation as well as
the interpretation of specific design guidelines and making recom-
mendations for inclusion in the County's Mitigation Ordinance.
Mr. Daryl Phillips. Mr. Phillips, who recently sat for the
California State Architect's Exam, has extensive Building Depart-
ment plan review inspection and administrative experience. Mr.
Phillips, a Certified Building Official and an I.C.B.O. Certified
Inspector, has extensive experience in reviewing project plans.
Prior to joining Willdan, Mr. Phillips served as the Senior
Inspector/Plans Examiner for the City of Petaluma. Prior to
working in Petaluma, Mr. Phillips was the Building Official for the
Town of Cotati. Prior to serving in Cotati, Mr. Phillips was in
private business as a design architect.
In addition to these individuals, Mr. James Russell, also a
Registered Engineer, a Codes Consultant, and a former Chief
Building Official for a large Bay Area city, has associated
exclusively with Willdan for the purposes of URM Inventory and
developing Mitigation Programs for local cities under contract with
Willdan. As noted previously, Mr. Russell has extensive experience
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 13 of 35
regarding unreinforc ' masonry
inventories, mitigation programs,
standards for these buildings. Mr.
most preeminent consultants in the
hazard and reduction programs.
buildings -.d associated
and developing engineering
Russell is currently one of the
Bay Area regarding earthquake
We believe that the experience and qualifications of our staff in
Santa Rosa is currently unmatched by any other organization in
Northern California for support to cities relative to unreinforced
masonry hazard reduction programs. We also believe that our staff
can be a valuable resource to your City for consultation on a wide
variety of building code issues and assistance in continuing to
develop your URM Hazard Reduction Program.
EXHIBIT "A" 0 Page 14 of 35
Z
0
i
Mo. -j
w
O w .�
.! v
7
V v- v V,
O
4.4
i5 co
O
0MO
O
�� A'' page 15 of 35
svjj3jT
MARK SETTERLAND
PRESENT POSITION: Division Manager/Building Services
Willdan Associates
EDUCATION: University of La Verne
B.A., Engish
California State Polytechnic University -
Pomona, California
B.S. Equivalence in Civil Engineering
2 years Graduate Study - Structural
Engineering
EXPERIENCE: Mr. Setterland is the Division Manager in
charge of the Building Services Division
of Willdan's Santa Rosa office. He is
responsible for maintaining the
performance and quality of the building
inspection and plan check services
provided to Willdan's clientele in the
North Bay Area. He is also responsible
for all marketing efforts to develop
clientele and for all client interface
and public relations. Mr. Setterland is
currently acting as the Contract Building
Official for the Town of Corte Madera.
Prior to joining Willdan Associates, Mr.
Setterland served for two (2) years as a
project design engineer for Zucco
Associates, structural and civil
engineers in Santa Rosa, California. His
responsibilities there included
structural design and construction field
supervision and inspection for
commercial, residential and school
buildings.
Prior to joining Zucco Associates, Mr.
Setterland served as design/plan review
engineer for Sullivan Engineering in
Upland. His responsibilities included
structural design of commercial and
residential buildings; Title 24 energy
design; and UBC, structural,
architectural, energy, and handicap
access plan review for various local
cities.
EXHIBIT "A" - Page 16 of 35
Previous to that, Mr. tterland served
as a design engineer for J. W.
Engineering, performing municipal water
line design and drafting. He has also
worked in the construction industry for
approximately six (6) years as a
carpenter, foreman, superintendent, and
project manager.
MEMBERSHIPS IN
ORGANIZATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers
Structural Engineers Association of
Northern California
International Conference of Building
Officials
California Building Officials
Chi Epsilon - National Civil Engineering
Honor Fraternity
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Conventional Construction Committee of
Redwood Empire Chapter of I.C.B.O.
Seismology Committee of Structural
Engineers Association of N. California
Hazardous Buildings Committee of SEONC
REGISTRATION: California Registered Civil Engineer
CE44942
EXHIBIT "A" - Page 17 of 35
MARK FORREST
PRESENT POSITION: Supervising Plan Check Engineer
Willdan Associates
EDUCATION: California State Polytechnic University
San Luis Obispo, California
Architectural Engineering
EXPERIENCE: Mr. Forrest is the Supervising Plan Check
Engineer in the Building Services
Division of Willdan's Santa Rosa office.
He is responsible for managing the
section which performs structural,
architectural, UBC, Energy and Handicap
Access plan review for commercial,
industrial, and residential structures.
Prior to joining Willdan Associates, Mr.
Forrest served for two and a half (2k)
years as a project design engineer for
Zucco Associates, structural and civil
engineers in Santa Rosa, California. His
responsibilities there included
structural design and construction field
supervision and inspection for
commercial, residential and school
buildings.
Prior to joining Zucco Associates, Mr.
Forrest served f or three ( 3 ) years as a
Design Engineer for Myers, Nelson and
Associates, structural and civil
engineers in Los Angeles, California.
His responsibilities there included
structural design for residential and
commercial design.
MEMBERSHIPS IN
ORGANIZATIONS: Structural Engineers Association of
Northern California
Seismology Committee of SEONC
Hazardous Buildings Committee of SEONC
REGISTRATION: California, CE 43657
EXHIBIT "A.. 0 Page 18 of 35
KELLY JOHNSON
PRESENT POSITION:
EDUCATION:
Plan Check Engineer
Willdan Associates
Sacramento State University
B.S., Civil Engineering
EXPERIENCE: Mr. Johnson is a Plan Check Engineer in
the Building Services Division of
Willdan's Santa Rosa office. He is
responsible for the structural, archi-
tectural, UBC, energy and handicap access
plan review for commercial, industrial,
and residential structures.
Prior to joining Willdan Associates, Mr.
Johnson served for four and a half years
as a plan checker for the Sonoma County
Building Inspection Department in Santa
Rosa, California. His responsibilities
included structural, architectural, UBC,
energy and handicap access plan review
for residential and commercial
structures. He consulted with builders,
engineers, contractors, architects and
the public concerning building code and
permit requirements.
Prior to joining the Sonoma County
Building Inspection Department, Mr.
Johnson served for six months as a design
engineer for MKM and Associates,
structural and civil engineers in Santa
Rosa, California. His responsibilities
included structural design of residential
and commercial structures.
MEMBERSHIPS IN
ORGANIZATIONS: International Conference of Building
Officials
I.C.B.O. Certified Plans Examiner
REGISTRATION: California Registered Civil Engineer
CE43674
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 19 of 35
®ARYL A. PHILLIPS
PRESENT POSITION: Senior Plans Examiner
Willdan Associates
EDUCATION: Institute of Design Engineering, Phoenix,
Arizona
International Conference of Building
Officials sponsored courses
Office of the State Architect Department
of Rehabilitation sponsored seminars on
the Title 24 Handicapped Accessibility
Regulations (yearly)
EXPERIENCE: Mr. Phillips is a Senior Plans Examiner/
Building Inspector in the Building
Services Division of Willdan's Santa Rosa
office. He is responsible for the
structural, architectural, UBC, UMC, UPC,
energy and handicap access plan review
for commercial, industrial, and
residential projects. He is also
responsible for performing residential
and commercial inspections for code
conformance and consistency with approved
project documents.
Prior to joining Willdan Associates, Mr.
Phillips served for over one year as
Plans Examiner, City of Petaluma. He was
responsible for processing, tracking, and
assessing fees for over 4, 000 permits per
year, and performing all types of
inspections as needed.
Prior to joining the City of Petaluma,
Mr. Phillips served for almost three
years as the Building Official for the
City of Cotati. He was responsible for
the entire operation of the Building
Department. This included all required
field inspections of residential,
commercial and industrial buildings, as
well as plan review, permit processing
and fiscal management.
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 20 of 35
Prior to joining the Cj of Cotati, Mr.
Phillips was self-employed for three
years as a Plans Examiner and Building
Designer in Santa Rosa, California.
MEMBERSHIPS IN
ORGANIZATIONS: Redwood Empire Chapter of I.C.B.O.
Past Chairman, Sonoma County Codes
Advisory Board
I.C.B.O. Certified Building Inspector
#20277
CABO Certified Building Official
#1450
Architectural Registration Exam,
July, 1990 (first time)
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 21 of 35
JAMES E. RUSSELL
EXPERIENCE: Mr. Russell is a Professional Engineer and
Codes Consultant having special expertise
in Building Code Enforcement and Seismic
Hazard Reduction Management.
Mr. Russell has, served in several
Building Inspection positions including
Chief of Code Enforcement for the City of
Walnut Creek; and for four (4) years as
Seismic Hazard Program Manager, Building
Inspector, Plans Examiner, and Assistant
Building Official for the City of Palo
Alto.
Prior to joining the City of Palo Alto,
Mr. Russell was employed for three (3)
years as a Structural Designer with the
San Francisco firm of Graham & Kellam
Structural Engineers.
Mr. Russell also served for six (6) years
as a U.S. Air Force Construction Manager
and Surveyor.
MEMBERSHIP IN
ORGANIZATIONS: International Conference of Building
Officials
California Building Officials
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Bay Area Earthquake Preparedness Project
Member of the Advisory Board
REGISTRATION: California, CE 029654
I.C.B.O. Certified Building Inspector,
Plans Examiner
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 22 of 35
JAMF RUSSELL'S EXPERIENCE REGI ING
HAZARDOUS BUILDING STRENGTHENING PROGRAMS
Serving the City of Palo Alto as its Seismic Hazard Program
Manager from 1981 to 1986, Mr. Russell conducted research and
prepared advisory reports, and worked with community organizations
to resolve economic and social impact obstacles to the City's
hazard reduction program development. He drafted multiple versions
of a hazard reduction ordinance for debate by the City Council and
its appointed citizens' committee, and wrote the structural
engineering evaluation standards contained in the final ordinance.
He performed the inventory of all the unreinforced masonry (URN)
buildings and trained and supervised other staff inventorying over
800 buildings of other structural types. He has reviewed all the
engineering evaluation reports submitted to the City of Palo Alto
pursuant to their ordinance for compliance with the provisions
containted in the engineering evaluation standards.
In October, 1989, immediately after the Lome Prieta
earthquake, he provided guidance and wrote drafts of reconstruction
policy and repair standards for the Town of Los Gatos to deal with
the variety of buildings damaged by the earthquake.
During 1989-90, he worked under contract to the cities of
Burlingame, Corte Madera, Danville, Gilroy, Livermore, Los Gatos,
and Newark to inventory their URM buildings and develop
alternatives for hazard reduction including structural repair
standards.
In addition, Mr. Russell has:
• Co-authored a report on the history of the Palo Alto
Ordinance to be released by the California Seismic Safety
Commission in January 1991. (SSC Report No. 90-05)
• Researched and written for the California Seismic Safety
Commission, the first annual report to the State
Legislature on the status of SB 547 implementation. SSC
Report No. 88-03 (July 1988)
• Written and published a report for the California
Building Officials titled SB 547 : Implementation Issues,
Obstacles and Onoortunities Facincr Local Government.
(February 1988)
• Served on a panel who wrote the political, economic and
social issues section of the Federal Emergency Management
Agency, (FEMA) publication, Proposed National Action Plan
for Abatina Earthauake Hazardous Buildinas., (1985)
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 23 of 35
• Assisted th City of Morgan Hill Buil ag Official and
City Attorney to write an emergency ordinance requiring
repair of URM buildings damaged by the 1984 Hall's Valley
earthquake.
Mr. Russell is presently under contract to VSP Associates,
Inc., to perform building rehabilitation data collection and other
research in the nine cities to be studied as part of a Federal
Emergency Management Agency project titled: Cost Benefit Analyses
of Seismic Rehabilitation of Hazardous Buildings.
In July and November, 1990, he participated in two workshops
sponsored by the California Universities for Research in Earthquake
Engineering and the Kajima Corporation of Japan, on the topic of
technology transfer within the field of earthquake engineering.
Mr. Russell has also served on the Review Panel for the
following publications:
• Putting Seismic Safetv Policies to Work. and Hazardous
Building Case Studies, Bay Area Regional Earthquake
Preparedness Project.
• Procedures for Post-Earthauake Safetv Evaluation of
Buildings. ATC -20 and Post-Earthauake Building Safetv
Evaluation Field Manual. ATC -20-1 Applied Technology
Council, sponsored by the California Office of Emergency
Services. September 1989
• Handbook on Establishing Priorities for Seismic
Retrofitting of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program.
March 1989
Mr. Russell is an associate member of the California
Building Officials (CALBO) and serves on both the Seismic Safety
and Emergency Preparedness Committees of that organization. He has
also served as a member of the Policy Advisory Board of the Bay
Area Regional Earthquake Preparedness Project (BAREPP) since its
inception in 1985.
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 24 of 35
RELATED EXPERIENCI
General
Willdan Associates specializes in providing professional
engineering, planning and building services to municipalities.
Since its formation in 1964, the firm has been performing City
Engineering functions on a contract basis in a number of cities.
The firm has been providing building services to cities on a
contract basis since 1979.
All of the principals of the firm are Registered Civil Engineers
and all are former employees of public agencies. Members of the
firm hold the title of City Engineer, Building Official, Traffic
Engineer, Public Works Director, Redevelopment Agency Engineer or
Planning Director for those cities where we are retained on a
contract basis. This broad range of municipal services experience
will be of value in providing URM related services to the City of
San Rafael.
svecific Oualifications
The Building Services Staff within our Santa Rosa office contains
three engineers licensed in the State of California and experienced
in structural design and plan review. This experience extends over
a wide variety of structural systems and types but is specific to
masonry buildings. Two of the engineers on our staff have
extensive design experience including masonry as a material. These
same two engineers are members of the Structural Engineers Associa-
tion of Northern California and both serve on the Hazardous
Buildings Sub -Committee of the Seismology Committee of the
Structural Engineers Association. The Hazardous Buildings
Committee in consort with the California Building Officials
Organization is the body that developed the design provisions
recently passed at the 1990 I.C.B.O. Convention in Denver for
addition to the Uniform Code for Building Conservation. These
requirements are essentially the same as those contained within the
resolution attached to the Ordinance of the City of San Rafael.
The third engineer on our Building Services Staff in Santa Rosa, a
former employee of the County of Sonoma, has extensive experience
both in the inventory process of URM buildings and was also
involved on their committee to develop and implement a Mitigation
Program for the County of Sonoma.
In addition to the above-named staff, Willdan Associates has
retained the exclusive services of Mr. James Russell, a Building
Code Consultant, to assist us in our URM Assistance Program to
cities. Mr. Russell has extensive experience in URM Inventory,
Mitigation Programs and related issues. Mr. Russell, formerly the
Seismic Hazard Program Manager for the City of Palo Alto, was
responsible for development of their ordinance. Mr. Russell has
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 25 of 35
also, in consort wi Willdan Associates, and c his own, developed
and implemented vai,,.ous URM Inventory and Mitigation Programs for
various cities throughout the Bay Area. Mr. Russell is also a
Consultant to the California Seismic Safety Commission and has
authored or co-authored many articles concerning implementation and
mitigation of URM buildings and other seismic issues relative to
buildings and structures.
Relevant Proiects
Willdan Associates, in association with Mr. Russell, has worked
under contract to the cities of Corte Madera, Danville, Gilroy,
Livermore, Los Gatos, and Newark within the greater Bay Area to
assist them in their inventory of URM buildings and help them
develop alternatives for hazard reduction including structural
repair standards. Willdan Associates has provided plan review
services for URM buildings in the City of Napa.
URM References
Mr. Robert Paul
Director of Public Works
Town of Corte Madera
(415) 927-5062
Mr. Ted Morrison
Building Official
County of Sonoma
(707) 527-2231
Mr. Graham Lang
Chief Building Inspector
City of Napa
(707) 257-9540
Mr. Scott Baker
Building Official
Town of Los Gatos
(408) 354-6834
Mr. Stan Wheeler
Building Official
City of Livermore
(415) 373-5180
Statement of Oualifications - Assessment Enaineerinq
Willdan Associates and its staff have been directly responsible, at
one time or another, for the establishment of virtually every
option available to local government for financing public projects.
This includes formation of assessment districts under the
Improvement Act of 1911, the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, the
Issuance of Bonds under the 1911 and 1915 Acts, and The Landscape
and Lighting Act of 1972, Community Facilities Districts under the
Mello -Roos Community Faciliites Act of 1982, Landscape and Lighting
Districts under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, and other
special districts such as Fire Fee Districts.
EXHIBIT "A" - Page 26 of 35
Within Willdan's Be Area Region, the staff ir. 'oth the Santa Rosa
and Pleasanton off ivas have been directly involved in the formation
of Assessment Districts, Landscaping and Lighting Districts, and
Community Facility Districts. Examples of Willdan's experience
with Assessment Districts and Mello -Roos Community Facilities
Districts are included in the following pages.
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 27 of 35
RELATED EXPERIENCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT A -) MELLO-ROOS
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS
Citv of Willits - Street Maintenance Assessment District,
Willdan Associates is currently preparing an Engineer's Report and
assessment spread for a 1982 Act Benefit Assessment District. The
City-wide District, with approximately 1800 parcels, was formed to
provide street maintenance funds.
Contact: Mr. Bill Van Orden, City Manager, City of Willits,
(707) 459-4601.
Citv of Brentwood - Landscaoina and Liahtinq Assessment District
Willdan Associates was responsible for the consolidation of
existing Landscaping & Lighting Districts into the Brentwood
Landscaping and Lighting District. In the past, the City had not
been collecting assessments from these districts. Therefore,
Willdan prepared an Engineer's Report and the assessment spread for
the new district to implement collection of assessments to cover
the costs of landscaping and lighting maintenance.
Contact: Mr. David W. Bryan, Director of Public Works/City
Engineer, City of Brentwood, (415) 634-6920.
Citv of Union Citv - Landscaping and Liahtinq Assessment District
This project involved the formation of a City-wide Landscaping and
Lighting District in Union City to cover the costs of landscaping
and lighting maintenance. Willdan was responsible for the prepara-
tion of the Engineer's Report and the assessment spread. Each year
Willdan updates this report to include new development and
additional zones of benefit.
Contact: Mr. Richard Sealana, Grounds Supervisor, City of Union
City, (415) 471-3232.
Citv of Riverside - Lusk Highlander CFD
The City of Riverside selected Willdan Associates to provide
special tax consultant services for this residential CFD. The
District was confirmed in August, 1990 with a $27,000 bond
authorization.
Contact: Ms. Barbara Steckel, City of Riverside, (714) 782-5539.
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 28 of 35
Citv of Fillmore - Cc unitv Facilities District
The City of Fillmore selected Willdan to provide special tax
apportionment services for a multi -landowner commercial
development. The District was formed in April, 1990. Construction
costs are over $6,000,000.
Citv of Fillmore - North Fillmore Industrial Park
Willdan was selected to provide special tax consulting services in
the formation of a district to provide infrastructure within a 127 -
acre industrial area. The Mello -Roos taxing formula considered
three zones of improvements and 15 property owners.
Contact: Mr. Roy L. Payne, City Manager, City of Fillmore, (805)
524-3701.
Citv of Chino - Community Facilities District No. 1
Willdan was selected to provide special tax apportionment services
for this residential/commercial/light industrial development area
to be funded by acreage fees. The district was formed to fund
improvements required by City ordinance. The district was formed
in late 1988; the project will be accomplished in multiple phases
and annexations. The first phase improvements are funded for $5
million; the first annexation is complete.
Contact: Mr. Alan Kreimeier, City of Chino, (714) 627-7577.
Citv of Moreno Vallev - Townaate
This district, involving a single landowner, was formed to fund
infrastructure for commercial development in Moreno Valley and is
on ±300 acres. It is expected that $19 million in bonds will be
sold in two issues.
Contact: City of Moreno Valley, (714) 925-7155.
Citv of Santa Ana - Community Facilities District (MacArthur Park
Willdan was selected to provide special tax apportionment services
for a proposed ±64 -acre commercial development in Santa Ana,
involving a single landowner. The district represented phased
development with an estimated $20 million in bonds over a ten -to -
twenty year development period. The developer withdrew its
petition.
Contact: Mr. George Alvarez, Public Services Agency, City of Santa
Ana, (714) 647-5659.
EXHIBIT "A" - Page 29 of 35
City of Ontario - Dav *eek Imr)rovements
This district involved the sale of approximately $15 million in
bonds for the construction of the Day Creek drainage channel. It
involved approximately 30 properties and a landowner vote which
passed by over 90 percent. It is believed to be the first Mello -
Roos Community Facilities District undertaken in the State of
California for other than a single developer. Tax apportionment
reports prepared by Willdan have been cited by several underwriters
in their efforts to promote that activity.
Contact: Mr. LeRoy Bender, City Engineer, City of Ontario, (714)
986-1151.
Citv of Rancho Cucamonga - Mello -Roos Communitv Facilities District
This district was implemented concurrently with the above-mentioned
Day Creek District in the City of Ontario. This was for extension
of the Day Creek project involving approximately $20 million and
over 100 separate property owners in a landowner vote. The voters
approved the program by a margin of over 80 percent.
Contact: Mr. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, City of Rancho
Cucamonga, (714) 989-1851.
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District - Mello -Roos Communitv
Facilities District
This was a combination operational and capital improvements
community facilities district for the construction and operation of
fire suppression facilities. It involved over 150 owners in a
landowners vote. The properties were mostly undeveloped but, upon
development, will deliver an estimated annual operation tax of over
$1 million.
Contact: Chief Dennis Michael, Foothill Fire Protection District,
(714) 987-2535.
Sweetwater Unified High School District - Mello -Roos Communitv
Facilities District
This single developer program proposes financing and construction
of several high schools needed to serve an increased population of
approximately 20,000 persons over the next 20 years. Bonds were
authorized in the amount of $150 million, being a partial financing
mechanism to integrate with other State funds if available.
Contact: Mr. Andy Campbell, Director of Development, Sweetwater
Unified High School District, (619) 691-5553.
EXHIBIT "A" - Page 30 of 35
Chula Vista Elementai School District - Mell Roos Communitv
Facilities District
This project involved formation of a single developer community
facilities district for the construction of elementary schools to
serve approximately 10,000 persons over a period of approximately
20 years. Bonds have been authorized in the total amount of $100
million. This program covers the same area as the Sweetwater
Unified School District. .
Contact: Mr. John Lynn, Business Manager, Chula Vista Elementary
School District, (619) 425-9600.
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 31 of 35
PROJECT FEE
It is our understanding that the City plans to collect a $1,000 fee
per building at submittal to offset the costs associated with the
plan review and information matrix development process. Based on
the inventory list dated 11/30/90, there appears to be 45 buildings
that will require a submittal and subsequent review based upon the
Ordinance.
We propose that the $1,000 fee submitted by each building owner be
divided into two categories. Category 11 would be allocated $850.
This fee would be reserved for reviewing the structural analysis,
conceptual plans, and proposed cost estimates for each individual
submittal. Category #2 would be allocated $150 from each separate
submittal to develop a total fund of approximately $6,750. This
total fee would be used to develop the informational matrix and for
project coordination.
We propose that Willdan be compensated on an hourly fee basis
consistent with Willdan's current Schedule of Hourly Rates for all
services performed. A copy of the 1990-91 schedule is enclosed
herein. In addition to our staff rates, Willdan's URM Consultant,
Mr. Russell, is charged at $90 per hour.
On individual projects where the actual cost of performing the
review is anticipated to exceed $875 as noted above, actual work in
excess of $875, will not be performed or charged without prior
authorization by the City. We will keep separate cost information
data on each specific plan submittal, information matrix
development, and project coordination.
Based upon the assumptions and Scope of Services contained herein,
it is estimated that Willdan Associates can provide all of the
services outlined in the City's Request for Proposal within the
$1,000 fee per building.
It should be noted that the cost for providing services described
in the "Additional Services Available" section of the Scope have
not been included. The specific scope and subsequent fees for
these services can be further defined if the City decides to
utilize these additional services.
Unless otherwise desired by the City, Willdan will invoice monthly
for services rendered the previous month.
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 32 of 35
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
July 1, 1990 - June 30, 1991
Fee Rate
Classification Per Hour
Enaineerina
Sr. Consultant
$ 135.00
Principal Engineer
118.00
Division Manager
108.00
City Engineer
108.00
Project Director
105.00
Sr. Engineer
88.00
Sr. Project Manager
88.00
Project Manager
80.00
Associate Engineer
80.00
Sr. Designer (CADD)
80.00
Designer (CARD)
73.00
Supervising Engineer
98.00
Engineering Associate
80.00
Sr. Designer
73.00
Sr. Design Engineer
67.00
Design Engineer
61.00
Sr. Drafter
61.00
Designer
56.00
Sr. Drafter (CADD)
61.00
Drafter (CADD)
56.00
Drafter
49.00
Technical Aide
41.00
Spvsr. - Public Works Observation
77.00
Sr. Public Works Observer
67.00
Public Works Observer
57.00
Real Property Services
Sr. Real Property Agent 98.00
Real Property Agent 80.00
Assistant Real Property Agent 67.00
Survevinq
Spvsr. Mapping Services
98.00
Sr. Survey Analyst
80.00
Sr. Calculator
80.00
Calculator II
67.00
Calculator I
56.00
Survey Analyst II
67.00
Survey Analyst I
56.00
Spvsr. - Survey
88.00
Survey Party Chief
84.00
Two -Man Field Party
145.00
Three -Man Field Party
190.00
Effective 7/1/90
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 33 of 35
Schedule of Hourly " to
July 1990
Page 2
Fee Rate
Per Hour
Special Districts
Spvsr. Special Districts Services $ 98.00
Sr. Special Districts Coordinator 88.00
Special Districts Coordinator 80.00
Special Districts Analyst II 67.00
Special Districts Analyst I 56.00
Plannina
Division Manager
108.00
Principal Planner
98.00
Sr. Planner
80.00
Planning Associate
73.00
Planning Assistant
61.00
Planning Technician
45.00
Community Development Services Coordinator
88.00
Sr. Community Development Specialist
73.00
Community Development Specialist
61.00
Buildinq
Division Manager
108.00
Supervising Plan Check Engineer
98.00
Plan Check Engineer
79.00
Plans Examiner
68.00
Plans Examiner Aide
44.00
Spvsr. Building Inspector
71.00
Building Inspector
61.00
Sr. Permit Specialist
55.00
Assistant Building Inspector
51.00
Permit Specialist
44.00
Landscape Architecture
Principal Landscape Architect 88.00
Sr. Landscape Architect 73.00
Associate Landscape Architect 67.00
Assistant Landscape Architect 56.00
Computer Services
Division Manager - Computer Services 108.00
Manager - Computer Operations 80.00
Sr. Software Engineer 67.00
Sr. Program Analyst 67.00
Program Analyst 56.00
Programmer 45.00
Computer Data Entry 42.00
Computer Time 38.00
Other
Word Processing 38.00
EXHIBIT "A" - Page 34 of 35
Schedule of Hourly Ra
July 1990
Page 3
Consultation in connection with litigation and court appearances
will be quoted separately.
Additional billing classifications may be added to the above
listing during the year as new positions are created.
The above schedule is for straight time. Overtime will be charged
at 1.25 times the standard hourly rates. Sundays and holidays will
be charged at 1.70 times the standard hourly rates.
It should be noted that the foregoing wage rates are effective
through June 30, 1991. The rates may be adjusted after that date
to compensate for labor adjustments and other increases in other
costs.
06/06/90 EFFECTIVE 7/1/90
Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT "A" • Page 35 of 35