Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Resolution 8323 (Masonry Building Program Services)follows: RESOLUTION NO. 8 3 2 3 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF AN AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CHECKING SERVICES - UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDING PROGRAM THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL RESOLVES as The DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS and THE CITY CLERK are authorized to execute, on behalf of the City of San Rafael, an agreement with Willdan Associates for structural engineering checking services as described in the attached proposal, dated December 21, 1990; form of agreement shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney. I, JEANNE. M. LEONCINI, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of said City on Monday, the 7th day of January, 1991, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Boro, Breiner, Shippey, Thayer & Mayor Mulrya NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None JE M. LEONC ' I, City Clerk J �� AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR PROFESSIONAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES This Agreement is made and entered into this 7th day of January 1991 by and between the CITY OF SAN RAFAEL (hereinafter called City) and WILLDAN ASSOCIATES (hereinafter called Consultant). A. SCOPE OF WORK In accordance with this Agreement, the Consultant will provide professional structural engineering services to review and check engineering calculations and cost estimates submitted in accordance with the City's "Unreinforced Masonry Ordinance", as outlined in the Proposal from Consultant for the subject project, dated December 21, 1990, marked Exhibit "A", attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. The Consultant agrees to be available and perform the work specified in this agreement in the time frame as specified and as shown in Exhibit "N'. B. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR It is understood and agreed that the Consultant is, and at all times shall be, an independent contractor and nothing contained herein shall be construed as making the Consultant, or any individual whose compensation for services is paid by the Consultant, an agent or employee of the City, or authorizing the Consultant to create or assume an obligation for or on behalf of the City. C. PAYMENT For the payments specified herein, which the City agrees to make, the Consultant will undertake the above noted work. Payment for Professional Engineering services will be made as follows: (1) The Consultant shall receive payment on a time and material basis for services rendered in accordance with the rates shown on his current fee schedule, set out in Exhibit "A". (2) The total payment made for any individual work task will not exceed the amounts shown on the Proposal Budget, set out in Exhibit "A", without prior authorization by the City. (3) Consultant's professional service fees shall be invoiced on a monthly basis. (4) Payments made by the City shall be made within 15 days of receipt of invoice. P y ENGINEERING AGREEME1 • Page 2 D. TERM The terms of this Agreement shall be from the date of execution to December 31, 1991. Either party may terminate this Agreement by giving other party thirty (30) days written notice. In the event of termination, City shall pay Consultant all sums then due and unpaid as of the date of receipt of notice. Payment by City of such compensation shall be considered full and final settlement for all work performed by the Consultant under this Agreement. All completed reports and other documents and materials described in Exhibit "A" shall become the property of the City. E. ARBITRATION All claims or disputes between the City and the Consultant relating to this Agreement shall be decided by arbitration pursuant to the current provisions of the California Code of Civil Procedure and any successor statutes. The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on the parties. In interpreting the provisions of this Agreement, the arbitrator may make an award of costs and fees, including attorney's fees necessitated by arbitration. F. ALTERATIONS This Agreement may be modified, as necessary, for the successful and timely completion of the services to be provided. Any alteration shall be expressed in writing, as an amendment to this Agreement, and shall be executed by both parties. Amendments to Exhibit "A", may be made by mutual agreement, in writing, signed by Consultant and the Director of Public Works, or the Director's appointed representative. G. ASSIGNMENT No assignment of this Agreement, either in whole or in part, shall be made by Consultant without the prior written consent of City. H. NOTICE Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been given when the same is sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the respective parties as follows: City of San Rafael Willdan Associates Dept. of Public Works 141 Stoney Circle #260 P. O. Box 151560 Santa Rosa, Ca. 95401 San Rafael, Ca. 94915-1560 Attn: Mark Setterland Attn: Fred Vincenti ENGINEERING AGREEMEN i • Page 3 of 3 I.. INSURANCE During the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain: comprehensive general liability insurance with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 for bodily or personal injury or property damage as the result of any single occurrence and $2,000,000 per annual aggregate; Consultant shall also maintain professional liability insurance with a limit of liability of not less than $500,000 per claim, and in the aggregate. City shall be added as a named insured on the general and comprehensive general liability insurance. Prior to beginning work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide the City with evidence that the insurance described above is in place. J. INDEMNITY Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from and against liability arising from Consultant's negligent acts, errors, or omissions in performance of the work, or for willful or intentional misconduct relating to activities carried out pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have caused their authorized representatives to execute this Agreement the day and year first written above. ATTEST: JE � NE M. LEON NI�-.� City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: GARY T. RAGGHIANT1 City Attorney CIT SAN RAFAEL: M. BERNARDI Director of Public Works CONSULTANT: WILLDAN ASSOCIATESI Attachment ( 1 ): 1. Exhibit "A" - Proposal from Consultant. "roressionol Consulting Sen i.: es once No. December 21, 1990 Mr. Fred Vincenti Senior Engineer Department of Public Works CITY OF SAN RAFAEL 1400 Fifth Avenue San Rafael, CA 94901 Subject: PROPOSAL FOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION OF URM BUILDINGS FOR THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Dear Fred: In response to your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal to perform structural engineering evaluation review services to the City for assistance in your development process for mitigation of the hazards proposed by URM buildings contained within your City. During the past two weeks, we have reviewed your ordinance, your resolution, the inventory of suspected unreinforced masonry buildings, and your request for proposal. In addition, we have met and discussed with you and Mr. Lloyd Strom some specific issues relative to this proposal. We have assembled a highly qualified team of individuals and subconsultants to complete the plan review and computer informational matrix development services as outlined in your request for proposal. We have prepared for your consideration, a proposal that describes our understanding of the project and the key issues, a detailed description of our proposed scope of services, a description of our project team and management hierarchy, information describing our qualifications and related experience, and a discussion about our proposed fee structure. We appreciate the opportunity to offer this proposal to your City to provide structural analysis review services for the evaluation of URM buildings contained within your City. Willdan Associates is committed to providing a quality service to our clients. We EXHIBIT "A" • Page 1 of 35 .1' 'I, CIRCLE • SUITE 26:1 9 SANTA ROSA CA 95401 0 (707) 542-6822 • FAX (707) 542-6830 Mr. Fred Vincenti Page 2 December 21, 1990 encourage you to contact any of the references contained within this proposal and to check on our past performance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to'contact me. We look forward to working with you to complete this important project. Respectfully Submitted, WILLDAN ASSOCIATES ,411W A MET WIRRI-4plaw—W.W1,' < Mar:: Setterland, P.E. Division Manager/Building Services MS/arf EXHIBIT "A" • Page 2 of 35 TABLE OF CONTENT1 PROJECT APPROACH • Statement of Understanding • Key Issues and Objectives • Special Qualifications SCOPE OF WORK • Introduction • Description of Services • Time Estimate • Conflict of Interest • Additional Services Available PROJECT MANAGEMENT • Responsible Personnel • Additional Support Staff • Project Organizational Chart • Resumes RELATED EXPERIENCE • General • Specific Qualifications • Relevant Projects • URM References • Statement of Qualifications - Assessment Engineering • Public Finance References PROJECT FEE • Discussion of Fees • Schedule of Hourly Rates EXHIBIT "A" - Page 3 of 35 PROJECT APPROACH Statement of Understandinq In June of 1986, Governor George Deukmejian signed into law Senate Bill 547, otherwise known as the Unreinforced Masonry Building Law. This law requires cities and counties within California's Seismic Hazard Zone No. 4 to do two things. First, they must inventory all unreinforced masonry buildings in their jurisdictions; and second, they must establish local programs to mitigate the earthquake hazards in those buildings. This law also requires that jurisdic- tions notify the owners of the potential hazards of these buildings and establish a program to mitigate the hazards posed by these buildings within their communities. The City of San Rafael has completed the f irst major requirement of this law - the inventory of all buildings within the City. As the initial step in formulating a complete Hazard Mitigation Program, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1587 in May of 1990 requiring all owners of buildings identified under the inventory to prepare an engineering analysis of the structure in accordance with the criteria set forth in the Ordinance and a subsequent Resolution numbered 8171. In addition to the engineering analysis, each building owner was also required to prepare and submit a proposed cost estimate for bringing the building into conformance with the criteria contained in the Resolution. The next step in this hazard mitigation process is to perform a uniform and equitable review of the analysis and cost estimates to develop demographic information into a comprehensive data base to assist City Staff and the City Council in developing the second phase of their Hazard Mitigation Program. Rey Issues and Objectives Following is a brief description of some of the key issues and objectives that, we believe, must be given special attention in order to ensure a successful project: 1. Consistencv,. In an effort to be fair and equitable to all building owners, it is the City's desire that all review of engineering analysis and proposed cost estimates be performed by the same subconsulting firm using a consistent established approach and identical criteria for each building. 2. Timeframe. It is important to the City Staff that the timeframe allotted for completion of this project not be excessive. EXHIBIT "A.. 0 Page 4 of 35 3. Informational MF -ix. It is desired by t City that all information obta...ed during the review process be collated and collected into an electronic informational matrix with subsequent reports that will enable the City Staff to develop specific recommendations for proposal to the City Council for direction in completing the Hazard Mitigation Program. 4. Review of Cost Estimates.. The potential cost of upgrading a URM building could be staggering for many property owners. In light of this, it is imperative that a responsible, realistic review of proposed cost estimates be performed in order to develop a level of confidence associated with the actual cost for providing these retrofits for each individual building and for the group of buildings as a whole contained within the downtown area. 5. Conflict of Interest. In order to ensure that the structural analysis reviews are conducted in an objective and equitable manner, it is the City's desire that the consultant performing these services not be employed or connected in any way with any of the building owners or performing any private structural design work to clients within the City of San Rafael. special Oualifications Following are a few of the reasons, we believe, we are especially well qualified to undertake this URM review project for the City of San Rafael: 1. Staff Exnerience. Every member of our Building Services Staff within the Santa Rosa office has experience relative to the design of masonry buildings, the review of structural drawings of masonry buildings, the development of URM Standards, the inspection of URM buildings, or assistance in policy develop- ment at the jurisdiction level. Two members of our staff currently serve as Committee Members on the Hazardous Buildings Subcommittee of the Seismology Committee of the Structural Engineers Association of Northern California. This is one of the committees that worked in consort with CALBO to develop retrofit design standards for URM buildings that will be contained in the 1991 Uniform Code for Building conserva- tion. Two other members of our staff have been involved at the staff level in various jurisdictions in the development of URM inventory and mitigation programs. In addition, Willdan Associates has retained an exclusive agreement with Mr. James Russell, Building Codes Consultant. Mr. Russell is one of the most knowledgeable and well known experts in the field of URM Hazard Reduction Programs in the Bay Area today. In addition to these credentials, our staff members have experience in performing plan reviews on URM buildings both in the Town of Corte Madera and in the City of Napa. EXHIBIT "A" - Page 5 of 35 2. Turnaround Tir on Plan Reviews. We fee- we have sufficient staff within c z Santa Rosa office and wi...i the assistance of our URM Consultant to perform these plan reviews in a timely equitable manner . However, if we do receive a large volume of submittals at one time, we do have additional resources in our Pleasanton office and in our Roseville office to assist us in reviewing these submittals in a timely fashion. 3. Computer Support. Since Willdan Associates has a separate Computer Support Division staffed primarily with programmers and analyst specialists, we feel we can provide an electronic informational matrix that is specifically tailored for this project. 4. Conflict of Interest. Willdan Associates provides services specifically to municipalities and other public jurisdictions only. Neither Willdan nor any of its staff members currently works for any private client in the general Bay Area or within the city limits pf San Rafael. EXHIBIT "A" • Page 6 of 35 SCOPE OF WORK Introduction Willdan Associates specializes in providing a full range of municipal engineering, planning and building services. We serve our clients through a network of 19 offices with a staff of over 630 employees. Our business approach is to tailor our services specifically to the needs of our clients and to provide a great deal of personal service. We believe we offer the most complete and responsive Building Services available in California today. We believe we can provide your City with URM plan review services that meet your technical requirements as well as the scheduling require- ments in keeping with the level of service goals that your City has established. Description of Services It is our understanding that the submittals required by your ordinance for the URM Program consists of the following: 1. A structural analysis performed by a licensed engineer or architect outlining the existence, nature, and extent of structural deficiencies within a building which could result in collapse or partial collapse of the particular building. 2. Conceptual plans and details consisting of dimensioned floor and roof plans, wall elevations, repair details and other plan sections and details as necessary to complete the analysis. 3. Cost estimate of the proposed work to bring the structure in conformance with the City's ordinance. It is also our understanding that this plan review is not for the purpose of obtaining a building permit and showing strict conformance with the design provisions outlined in the resolution. This submittal is intended to be a conceptual only submittal to outline the nature and degree of problems within each building and to develop a reasonable cost estimate associated with providing this work. Based on the above assumptions, our services under this agreement shall consist of review of the submitted plans, structural analysis, cost estimates and any other supporting data submitted for conformance with the requirements outlined in the resolution. In addition, we will collate and arrange the information for all submittals into an information matrix on electronic form for submittal to you for use in future decision-making processes. EXHIBIT "A" • Page 7 of 35 The following is a mor detailed breakdown of our lope of Services for each part of our c.-rvices: A. METHOD OF CHECKING 1. Review of structural analvsis. We will provide a compre- hensive review of the structural analysis submitted on each individual project based on Sections III and IV of the analysis and design requirements contained in the resolution. This portion of the review will be performed by engineers licensed in the State of California and experienced in structural design provisions and the provisions contained within your resolution. Each engineer will develop a comprehensive checklist clearly identifying deficiencies in the design procedure relative to specific sections contained within the design requirements contained in the resolution. 2. Review of the conceptual plan submittal,. We will perform a review of the submitted plans, details and specifications for consistency with the structural analysis noted above and the specific requirements contained in Section I of the resolution. A detailed checklist will be developed for each specific project indicating all deficiencies and requirements based on the submittal and inconsistencies between the plans and the accompanying structural analysis. 3. Review of the proposed cost estimates,. We will provide a cursory review of the proposed cost estimates submitted by each building owner. This review is not intended to be a definitive support of actual construction costs, but a general review based on consistency with the submitted structural analysis and plans in order to establish a degree of confidence or lack thereof in the proposed cost estimate. B. INFORMATION MATRIX 1. Development of informational matrix. We will collate all the information obtained from all the individual projects submitted for review into a comprehensive, informational matrix containing categories developed by our staff in conjunction with recommendations and requirements of your staff. These categories may include (but are not limited to) : owner, AP number, occupancy classification, inventory number, proposed cost, proposed cost per square foot, etc. This matrix could be developed in many different forms using various types of software available on the market today. We would recommend that this matrix be developed using a relational data base program supported with structured query language to give the greatest amount of flexibility in dealing with this informational matrix. Since we have a computer support division in our corporate office, we have the capability to provide this matrix on almost any type of EXHIBIT "A" • Page 8 of 35 software curd `_ly available on the mar] : today. We will develop this d«..a base matrix in such a manner that it will be usable on a Macintosh Computer as required in your RFP. We will work closely with your staff to develop this program so that it is user friendly and easily accessible by any of your staff. We propose that the review portions of this, under Section A above, be accomplished by providing an initial check to determine consis- tency with the resolution, development of a subsequent checklist outlining inconsistencies with the requirements in the resolution, return of this checklist to the applicant, and review of his resubmittal. After completion of this second review, we will list all specific information relative to each individual project on standard forms that we will develop for this purpose. The information contained in these standard forms will be the information we will include in the electronic informational matrix. This will result in hard copies of information for each individual project in addition to a micro -disc supported data base of information relating all projects together. Time Estimate Based on the assumptions and the detailed breakdown of Section A, noted above, we anticipate that plan review time for each specific individual submittal will vary between 5 to 10 hours per submittal. Depending upon the actual software program identified for use in the informational matrix and what form the matrix may take, we anticipate between 30 to 40 hours of time to program the matrix, input the information, and develop and review all the reports. Assuming timely receipt of all submittals from the City, we anticipate that our internal staff can complete the initial review of all 45 plus projects in approximately 6 to 8 weeks. We assume there will be approximately 2 to 3 weeks turn -around time on the applicant's part, and an additional 2 to 4 weeks for recheck of the individual submittals. We assume the total timeframe for project review to be approximately 3 to 4 months. Initially, we plan to consult with the City to determine the requirements and the structured form of the data base for the informational matrix. We assume this form can be developed and programmed within the first 4 months - concurrent with the actual review process. After the review process is complete, it is assumed it will take 1 to 2 weeks to input all the information into the data base and to develop specific forms/printouts as required by the City. Therefore, we estimate the total timeframe for completion of this project to be between 4 and 6 months. In the event that we receive several submittals in our office at one time, we have various methods of handling the workload anticipated. We may authorize overtime and weekend time for our in-house staff to perform the reviews. We may decide to use engineers in other Willdan Building Service Division offices such EXHIBIT "A" - Page 9 of 35 as our Pleasanton off a or our Roseville offic( :o assist us in the review of these submittals. Both options are available to us and actual distribution of workload will be dependent upon actual workload unrelated to the City of San Rafael's work in our office in Santa Rosa at the time submittals are received. Conflict of Interest Willdan Associates does not provide building design services for any public or private client. Furthermore, our office in Santa Rosa is exclusively limited to providing services to, or on behalf of, public entities. Neither Willdan Associates nor any of our staff members are currently employed by anyone (including URM building owners) within the City for the purpose of structural engineering. Additional Services Available In addition to the work previously identified, Willdan Associates specializes in providing public financing services to many juris- dictions throughout the State. For this proposal, we have identified a financing mechanism that would not only aid the private property owner but also the City of San Rafael. We propose that the City consider funding improvements for the seismic retro- fitting of the buildings through the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982. In the past, the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act has only provided financing for public facilities. However, in August of this year, Senate Bill 27 amending Section 53313.5 of the Government Code (the Mello -Roos Act) was revised to permit financing seismic improvements on public and private property. In general, improvements necessary to bring buildings into compliance with seismic safety standards or regulations, certified as such by local building officials, may be financed. The only improvement which would not be allowed to be financed by this act would be if an existing building needs to be dismantled and a new building con- structed. Additionally, there is some information regarding this act that the City should be aware of. With this act, there are special voting requirements for this type of financing. For improvements on privately owned buildings, 100% positive vote of those voting is required and only the lots that the buildings are on may be included in the district. It should be noted that a Mello -Roos District could be formed for a single property owner if necessary; however, the more properties involved in a district, the more the process could be streamlined. Bonds issued for this type of financing will not be exempt from Federal income tax, but may be exempt from California State tax. The California exemption should provide a favorable interest rate to the building owner and a new source of funds. EXHIBIT "A" • Page 10 of 35 Willdan Associates mr'ntains an excellent repu' :ion in helping cities, counties anQ other jurisdictions formulate assessment districts and facilities districts such as described above. We would highly recommend that the City consider including this work in the project if you consider it a viable financing mechanism. We have included some of our relative experience in the formation of Assessment Districts and Mello -Roos Districts in the Related Experience section of this proposal. In addition to assistance to the City in public financing mechanisms for this project, Willdan Associates' Santa Rosa staff and consultants are available to assist the City in its decision- making process for further implementation of its Hazard Mitigation Program. Such additional services may include assisting the City Staff in developing Council Reports or presentations to clarify and/or present the information contained in the informational data base, development of additional information pertaining to or comparing results of this initial survey in the City of San Rafael with information developed and collated in other cities throughout the Bay Area. We can also be of assistance to the City Staff in researching, writing and implementing additional ordinances or resolutions as desired by Staff or Counsel to define the next phase of the City's Hazard Mitigation Program. Willdan Associates Bay Area Regional Office also offers a full service Planning Staff to assist local cities in planning issues. Our Planning Staff, in addition to the Building Staff and Consultants in the Santa Rosa office, are available to assist the City in assimilating the information based on the URM Inventory and Mitigation Program, and developing additional studies or reports to be included in the general downtown area plan that the City is in the process of developing. EXHIBIT "A" • Page 11 of 35 PROJECT MANAGEME1 Willdan Associates can offer the City of San Rafael a highly qualified staff to perform URM plan check and hazard mitigation support. As noted previously, our staff combines individuals with extensive experience within Building Departments relative to URM inventory and mitigation together with individuals with substantial design experience relative to the use of masonry as a structural material. This combination will be very effective in meeting the needs of the City in reviewing the URM hazard submittals and in being able to work effectively with the City Staff to develop the necessary information to present to the Council for their decision making process. Our approach in providing URM services to the City of San Rafael is a team approach. Our team will include a Project Manager who will be responsible for the overall management of the activities to the City, a Supervising Engineer who will be responsible for the day- to-day activities relative to the plan review, and a staff of engineers who will actually perform the work. In addition, our Consultant, Mr. Russell, will assist us in developing standard guidelines and standard forms that will be used to put this process together and to develop the subsequent informational matrix. After the review process is complete and the informational matrix is developed, our Project Manager and our Consultant will work closely with the City to assist them in organizing the information and developing a process for the Mitigation of Hazards for all of the buildings contained within the City. Resvonsible Personnel Mr. Mark Setterland will be the responsible person for the overall management of all services provided to the City of San Rafael. Mr. Setterland is the Division Manager of Willdan's Building Services Division in the Santa Rosa office. He is directly responsible for the management of all services including structural, non- structural, grading plan review, building inspection, and administration. Mr. Setterland, a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California, is also a member of the Hazardous Buildings Sub -Committee for the Structural Engineers Association of Northern California. Mr. Setterland has had extensive design engineering experience prior to joining Willdan, and is now one of Willdan's most experienced staff members in the area of structural plan checking. Prior to joining Willdan, Mr. Setterland worked as a design engineer with a structural design firm in the Santa Rosa area specializing in the structural design of large buildings, including masonry structures. He has considerable experience in performing building plan check services both with Willdan and prior to joining Willdan, and has considerable familiarity with local standards, conditions, and building design firms in the Redwood Empire. In addition, Mr. Setterland has been extensively involved EXHIBIT "A" • Page 12 of 35 in the State-wide effo` in the past few years to !velop specific design and detailing s'Landards for URM retrofit procedures. Mr. Setterland is also currently named as the Building Official for the Town of Corte Madera where he oversees all building services to that Town. Mr. Mark Forrest. Mr. Forrest will be the responsible individual to supervise and oversee the day-to-day operations in performing the plan review portion of our services to the City. Mr. Forrest is the Supervising Plan Check Engineer for Willdan's Plan Check Service in the Santa Rosa Office. Mr. Forrest is a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California with extensive structural design and plan review experience. Mr. Forrest is also a member of the Hazardous Buildings Committee of the Structural Engineers Association of Northern California. Mr. Forrest is the lead team member in our office for structural plan review. Prior to joining Willdan, Mr. Forrest worked as a project design engineer for a structural and civil engineering firm in the Santa Rosa area where his responsibilities included structural design, construction field supervision and inspection for commercial, residential and school buildings. He has extensive design experience in large buildings including masonry structures. Serving as a member of the Hazardous Buildings Committee, Mr. Forrest has considerable knowledge relative to current design and retrofit standards for unreinforced masonry buildings. Mr. Kelly Johnson. Mr. Johnson is a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California with extensive structural and non- structural plan review experience. Prior to joining Willdan Associates, Mr. Johnson worked as a Plan Check Engineer with the County of Sonoma. Mr. Johnson served as the Staff Engineer Public Liaison Officer for the County of Sonoma's URM Inventory and Mitigation Program. In this position, he was responsible for advising all committee members on current legislation as well as the interpretation of specific design guidelines and making recom- mendations for inclusion in the County's Mitigation Ordinance. Mr. Daryl Phillips. Mr. Phillips, who recently sat for the California State Architect's Exam, has extensive Building Depart- ment plan review inspection and administrative experience. Mr. Phillips, a Certified Building Official and an I.C.B.O. Certified Inspector, has extensive experience in reviewing project plans. Prior to joining Willdan, Mr. Phillips served as the Senior Inspector/Plans Examiner for the City of Petaluma. Prior to working in Petaluma, Mr. Phillips was the Building Official for the Town of Cotati. Prior to serving in Cotati, Mr. Phillips was in private business as a design architect. In addition to these individuals, Mr. James Russell, also a Registered Engineer, a Codes Consultant, and a former Chief Building Official for a large Bay Area city, has associated exclusively with Willdan for the purposes of URM Inventory and developing Mitigation Programs for local cities under contract with Willdan. As noted previously, Mr. Russell has extensive experience EXHIBIT "A" • Page 13 of 35 regarding unreinforc ' masonry inventories, mitigation programs, standards for these buildings. Mr. most preeminent consultants in the hazard and reduction programs. buildings -.d associated and developing engineering Russell is currently one of the Bay Area regarding earthquake We believe that the experience and qualifications of our staff in Santa Rosa is currently unmatched by any other organization in Northern California for support to cities relative to unreinforced masonry hazard reduction programs. We also believe that our staff can be a valuable resource to your City for consultation on a wide variety of building code issues and assistance in continuing to develop your URM Hazard Reduction Program. EXHIBIT "A" 0 Page 14 of 35 Z 0 i Mo. -j w O w .� .! v 7 V v- v V, O 4.4 i5 co O 0MO O �� A'' page 15 of 35 svjj3jT MARK SETTERLAND PRESENT POSITION: Division Manager/Building Services Willdan Associates EDUCATION: University of La Verne B.A., Engish California State Polytechnic University - Pomona, California B.S. Equivalence in Civil Engineering 2 years Graduate Study - Structural Engineering EXPERIENCE: Mr. Setterland is the Division Manager in charge of the Building Services Division of Willdan's Santa Rosa office. He is responsible for maintaining the performance and quality of the building inspection and plan check services provided to Willdan's clientele in the North Bay Area. He is also responsible for all marketing efforts to develop clientele and for all client interface and public relations. Mr. Setterland is currently acting as the Contract Building Official for the Town of Corte Madera. Prior to joining Willdan Associates, Mr. Setterland served for two (2) years as a project design engineer for Zucco Associates, structural and civil engineers in Santa Rosa, California. His responsibilities there included structural design and construction field supervision and inspection for commercial, residential and school buildings. Prior to joining Zucco Associates, Mr. Setterland served as design/plan review engineer for Sullivan Engineering in Upland. His responsibilities included structural design of commercial and residential buildings; Title 24 energy design; and UBC, structural, architectural, energy, and handicap access plan review for various local cities. EXHIBIT "A" - Page 16 of 35 Previous to that, Mr. tterland served as a design engineer for J. W. Engineering, performing municipal water line design and drafting. He has also worked in the construction industry for approximately six (6) years as a carpenter, foreman, superintendent, and project manager. MEMBERSHIPS IN ORGANIZATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Northern California International Conference of Building Officials California Building Officials Chi Epsilon - National Civil Engineering Honor Fraternity Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Conventional Construction Committee of Redwood Empire Chapter of I.C.B.O. Seismology Committee of Structural Engineers Association of N. California Hazardous Buildings Committee of SEONC REGISTRATION: California Registered Civil Engineer CE44942 EXHIBIT "A" - Page 17 of 35 MARK FORREST PRESENT POSITION: Supervising Plan Check Engineer Willdan Associates EDUCATION: California State Polytechnic University San Luis Obispo, California Architectural Engineering EXPERIENCE: Mr. Forrest is the Supervising Plan Check Engineer in the Building Services Division of Willdan's Santa Rosa office. He is responsible for managing the section which performs structural, architectural, UBC, Energy and Handicap Access plan review for commercial, industrial, and residential structures. Prior to joining Willdan Associates, Mr. Forrest served for two and a half (2k) years as a project design engineer for Zucco Associates, structural and civil engineers in Santa Rosa, California. His responsibilities there included structural design and construction field supervision and inspection for commercial, residential and school buildings. Prior to joining Zucco Associates, Mr. Forrest served f or three ( 3 ) years as a Design Engineer for Myers, Nelson and Associates, structural and civil engineers in Los Angeles, California. His responsibilities there included structural design for residential and commercial design. MEMBERSHIPS IN ORGANIZATIONS: Structural Engineers Association of Northern California Seismology Committee of SEONC Hazardous Buildings Committee of SEONC REGISTRATION: California, CE 43657 EXHIBIT "A.. 0 Page 18 of 35 KELLY JOHNSON PRESENT POSITION: EDUCATION: Plan Check Engineer Willdan Associates Sacramento State University B.S., Civil Engineering EXPERIENCE: Mr. Johnson is a Plan Check Engineer in the Building Services Division of Willdan's Santa Rosa office. He is responsible for the structural, archi- tectural, UBC, energy and handicap access plan review for commercial, industrial, and residential structures. Prior to joining Willdan Associates, Mr. Johnson served for four and a half years as a plan checker for the Sonoma County Building Inspection Department in Santa Rosa, California. His responsibilities included structural, architectural, UBC, energy and handicap access plan review for residential and commercial structures. He consulted with builders, engineers, contractors, architects and the public concerning building code and permit requirements. Prior to joining the Sonoma County Building Inspection Department, Mr. Johnson served for six months as a design engineer for MKM and Associates, structural and civil engineers in Santa Rosa, California. His responsibilities included structural design of residential and commercial structures. MEMBERSHIPS IN ORGANIZATIONS: International Conference of Building Officials I.C.B.O. Certified Plans Examiner REGISTRATION: California Registered Civil Engineer CE43674 EXHIBIT "A" • Page 19 of 35 ®ARYL A. PHILLIPS PRESENT POSITION: Senior Plans Examiner Willdan Associates EDUCATION: Institute of Design Engineering, Phoenix, Arizona International Conference of Building Officials sponsored courses Office of the State Architect Department of Rehabilitation sponsored seminars on the Title 24 Handicapped Accessibility Regulations (yearly) EXPERIENCE: Mr. Phillips is a Senior Plans Examiner/ Building Inspector in the Building Services Division of Willdan's Santa Rosa office. He is responsible for the structural, architectural, UBC, UMC, UPC, energy and handicap access plan review for commercial, industrial, and residential projects. He is also responsible for performing residential and commercial inspections for code conformance and consistency with approved project documents. Prior to joining Willdan Associates, Mr. Phillips served for over one year as Plans Examiner, City of Petaluma. He was responsible for processing, tracking, and assessing fees for over 4, 000 permits per year, and performing all types of inspections as needed. Prior to joining the City of Petaluma, Mr. Phillips served for almost three years as the Building Official for the City of Cotati. He was responsible for the entire operation of the Building Department. This included all required field inspections of residential, commercial and industrial buildings, as well as plan review, permit processing and fiscal management. EXHIBIT "A" • Page 20 of 35 Prior to joining the Cj of Cotati, Mr. Phillips was self-employed for three years as a Plans Examiner and Building Designer in Santa Rosa, California. MEMBERSHIPS IN ORGANIZATIONS: Redwood Empire Chapter of I.C.B.O. Past Chairman, Sonoma County Codes Advisory Board I.C.B.O. Certified Building Inspector #20277 CABO Certified Building Official #1450 Architectural Registration Exam, July, 1990 (first time) EXHIBIT "A" • Page 21 of 35 JAMES E. RUSSELL EXPERIENCE: Mr. Russell is a Professional Engineer and Codes Consultant having special expertise in Building Code Enforcement and Seismic Hazard Reduction Management. Mr. Russell has, served in several Building Inspection positions including Chief of Code Enforcement for the City of Walnut Creek; and for four (4) years as Seismic Hazard Program Manager, Building Inspector, Plans Examiner, and Assistant Building Official for the City of Palo Alto. Prior to joining the City of Palo Alto, Mr. Russell was employed for three (3) years as a Structural Designer with the San Francisco firm of Graham & Kellam Structural Engineers. Mr. Russell also served for six (6) years as a U.S. Air Force Construction Manager and Surveyor. MEMBERSHIP IN ORGANIZATIONS: International Conference of Building Officials California Building Officials Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Bay Area Earthquake Preparedness Project Member of the Advisory Board REGISTRATION: California, CE 029654 I.C.B.O. Certified Building Inspector, Plans Examiner EXHIBIT "A" • Page 22 of 35 JAMF RUSSELL'S EXPERIENCE REGI ING HAZARDOUS BUILDING STRENGTHENING PROGRAMS Serving the City of Palo Alto as its Seismic Hazard Program Manager from 1981 to 1986, Mr. Russell conducted research and prepared advisory reports, and worked with community organizations to resolve economic and social impact obstacles to the City's hazard reduction program development. He drafted multiple versions of a hazard reduction ordinance for debate by the City Council and its appointed citizens' committee, and wrote the structural engineering evaluation standards contained in the final ordinance. He performed the inventory of all the unreinforced masonry (URN) buildings and trained and supervised other staff inventorying over 800 buildings of other structural types. He has reviewed all the engineering evaluation reports submitted to the City of Palo Alto pursuant to their ordinance for compliance with the provisions containted in the engineering evaluation standards. In October, 1989, immediately after the Lome Prieta earthquake, he provided guidance and wrote drafts of reconstruction policy and repair standards for the Town of Los Gatos to deal with the variety of buildings damaged by the earthquake. During 1989-90, he worked under contract to the cities of Burlingame, Corte Madera, Danville, Gilroy, Livermore, Los Gatos, and Newark to inventory their URM buildings and develop alternatives for hazard reduction including structural repair standards. In addition, Mr. Russell has: • Co-authored a report on the history of the Palo Alto Ordinance to be released by the California Seismic Safety Commission in January 1991. (SSC Report No. 90-05) • Researched and written for the California Seismic Safety Commission, the first annual report to the State Legislature on the status of SB 547 implementation. SSC Report No. 88-03 (July 1988) • Written and published a report for the California Building Officials titled SB 547 : Implementation Issues, Obstacles and Onoortunities Facincr Local Government. (February 1988) • Served on a panel who wrote the political, economic and social issues section of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, (FEMA) publication, Proposed National Action Plan for Abatina Earthauake Hazardous Buildinas., (1985) EXHIBIT "A" • Page 23 of 35 • Assisted th City of Morgan Hill Buil ag Official and City Attorney to write an emergency ordinance requiring repair of URM buildings damaged by the 1984 Hall's Valley earthquake. Mr. Russell is presently under contract to VSP Associates, Inc., to perform building rehabilitation data collection and other research in the nine cities to be studied as part of a Federal Emergency Management Agency project titled: Cost Benefit Analyses of Seismic Rehabilitation of Hazardous Buildings. In July and November, 1990, he participated in two workshops sponsored by the California Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering and the Kajima Corporation of Japan, on the topic of technology transfer within the field of earthquake engineering. Mr. Russell has also served on the Review Panel for the following publications: • Putting Seismic Safetv Policies to Work. and Hazardous Building Case Studies, Bay Area Regional Earthquake Preparedness Project. • Procedures for Post-Earthauake Safetv Evaluation of Buildings. ATC -20 and Post-Earthauake Building Safetv Evaluation Field Manual. ATC -20-1 Applied Technology Council, sponsored by the California Office of Emergency Services. September 1989 • Handbook on Establishing Priorities for Seismic Retrofitting of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program. March 1989 Mr. Russell is an associate member of the California Building Officials (CALBO) and serves on both the Seismic Safety and Emergency Preparedness Committees of that organization. He has also served as a member of the Policy Advisory Board of the Bay Area Regional Earthquake Preparedness Project (BAREPP) since its inception in 1985. EXHIBIT "A" • Page 24 of 35 RELATED EXPERIENCI General Willdan Associates specializes in providing professional engineering, planning and building services to municipalities. Since its formation in 1964, the firm has been performing City Engineering functions on a contract basis in a number of cities. The firm has been providing building services to cities on a contract basis since 1979. All of the principals of the firm are Registered Civil Engineers and all are former employees of public agencies. Members of the firm hold the title of City Engineer, Building Official, Traffic Engineer, Public Works Director, Redevelopment Agency Engineer or Planning Director for those cities where we are retained on a contract basis. This broad range of municipal services experience will be of value in providing URM related services to the City of San Rafael. svecific Oualifications The Building Services Staff within our Santa Rosa office contains three engineers licensed in the State of California and experienced in structural design and plan review. This experience extends over a wide variety of structural systems and types but is specific to masonry buildings. Two of the engineers on our staff have extensive design experience including masonry as a material. These same two engineers are members of the Structural Engineers Associa- tion of Northern California and both serve on the Hazardous Buildings Sub -Committee of the Seismology Committee of the Structural Engineers Association. The Hazardous Buildings Committee in consort with the California Building Officials Organization is the body that developed the design provisions recently passed at the 1990 I.C.B.O. Convention in Denver for addition to the Uniform Code for Building Conservation. These requirements are essentially the same as those contained within the resolution attached to the Ordinance of the City of San Rafael. The third engineer on our Building Services Staff in Santa Rosa, a former employee of the County of Sonoma, has extensive experience both in the inventory process of URM buildings and was also involved on their committee to develop and implement a Mitigation Program for the County of Sonoma. In addition to the above-named staff, Willdan Associates has retained the exclusive services of Mr. James Russell, a Building Code Consultant, to assist us in our URM Assistance Program to cities. Mr. Russell has extensive experience in URM Inventory, Mitigation Programs and related issues. Mr. Russell, formerly the Seismic Hazard Program Manager for the City of Palo Alto, was responsible for development of their ordinance. Mr. Russell has EXHIBIT "A" • Page 25 of 35 also, in consort wi Willdan Associates, and c his own, developed and implemented vai,,.ous URM Inventory and Mitigation Programs for various cities throughout the Bay Area. Mr. Russell is also a Consultant to the California Seismic Safety Commission and has authored or co-authored many articles concerning implementation and mitigation of URM buildings and other seismic issues relative to buildings and structures. Relevant Proiects Willdan Associates, in association with Mr. Russell, has worked under contract to the cities of Corte Madera, Danville, Gilroy, Livermore, Los Gatos, and Newark within the greater Bay Area to assist them in their inventory of URM buildings and help them develop alternatives for hazard reduction including structural repair standards. Willdan Associates has provided plan review services for URM buildings in the City of Napa. URM References Mr. Robert Paul Director of Public Works Town of Corte Madera (415) 927-5062 Mr. Ted Morrison Building Official County of Sonoma (707) 527-2231 Mr. Graham Lang Chief Building Inspector City of Napa (707) 257-9540 Mr. Scott Baker Building Official Town of Los Gatos (408) 354-6834 Mr. Stan Wheeler Building Official City of Livermore (415) 373-5180 Statement of Oualifications - Assessment Enaineerinq Willdan Associates and its staff have been directly responsible, at one time or another, for the establishment of virtually every option available to local government for financing public projects. This includes formation of assessment districts under the Improvement Act of 1911, the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, the Issuance of Bonds under the 1911 and 1915 Acts, and The Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Community Facilities Districts under the Mello -Roos Community Faciliites Act of 1982, Landscape and Lighting Districts under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, and other special districts such as Fire Fee Districts. EXHIBIT "A" - Page 26 of 35 Within Willdan's Be Area Region, the staff ir. 'oth the Santa Rosa and Pleasanton off ivas have been directly involved in the formation of Assessment Districts, Landscaping and Lighting Districts, and Community Facility Districts. Examples of Willdan's experience with Assessment Districts and Mello -Roos Community Facilities Districts are included in the following pages. EXHIBIT "A" • Page 27 of 35 RELATED EXPERIENCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT A -) MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS Citv of Willits - Street Maintenance Assessment District, Willdan Associates is currently preparing an Engineer's Report and assessment spread for a 1982 Act Benefit Assessment District. The City-wide District, with approximately 1800 parcels, was formed to provide street maintenance funds. Contact: Mr. Bill Van Orden, City Manager, City of Willits, (707) 459-4601. Citv of Brentwood - Landscaoina and Liahtinq Assessment District Willdan Associates was responsible for the consolidation of existing Landscaping & Lighting Districts into the Brentwood Landscaping and Lighting District. In the past, the City had not been collecting assessments from these districts. Therefore, Willdan prepared an Engineer's Report and the assessment spread for the new district to implement collection of assessments to cover the costs of landscaping and lighting maintenance. Contact: Mr. David W. Bryan, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, City of Brentwood, (415) 634-6920. Citv of Union Citv - Landscaping and Liahtinq Assessment District This project involved the formation of a City-wide Landscaping and Lighting District in Union City to cover the costs of landscaping and lighting maintenance. Willdan was responsible for the prepara- tion of the Engineer's Report and the assessment spread. Each year Willdan updates this report to include new development and additional zones of benefit. Contact: Mr. Richard Sealana, Grounds Supervisor, City of Union City, (415) 471-3232. Citv of Riverside - Lusk Highlander CFD The City of Riverside selected Willdan Associates to provide special tax consultant services for this residential CFD. The District was confirmed in August, 1990 with a $27,000 bond authorization. Contact: Ms. Barbara Steckel, City of Riverside, (714) 782-5539. EXHIBIT "A" • Page 28 of 35 Citv of Fillmore - Cc unitv Facilities District The City of Fillmore selected Willdan to provide special tax apportionment services for a multi -landowner commercial development. The District was formed in April, 1990. Construction costs are over $6,000,000. Citv of Fillmore - North Fillmore Industrial Park Willdan was selected to provide special tax consulting services in the formation of a district to provide infrastructure within a 127 - acre industrial area. The Mello -Roos taxing formula considered three zones of improvements and 15 property owners. Contact: Mr. Roy L. Payne, City Manager, City of Fillmore, (805) 524-3701. Citv of Chino - Community Facilities District No. 1 Willdan was selected to provide special tax apportionment services for this residential/commercial/light industrial development area to be funded by acreage fees. The district was formed to fund improvements required by City ordinance. The district was formed in late 1988; the project will be accomplished in multiple phases and annexations. The first phase improvements are funded for $5 million; the first annexation is complete. Contact: Mr. Alan Kreimeier, City of Chino, (714) 627-7577. Citv of Moreno Vallev - Townaate This district, involving a single landowner, was formed to fund infrastructure for commercial development in Moreno Valley and is on ±300 acres. It is expected that $19 million in bonds will be sold in two issues. Contact: City of Moreno Valley, (714) 925-7155. Citv of Santa Ana - Community Facilities District (MacArthur Park Willdan was selected to provide special tax apportionment services for a proposed ±64 -acre commercial development in Santa Ana, involving a single landowner. The district represented phased development with an estimated $20 million in bonds over a ten -to - twenty year development period. The developer withdrew its petition. Contact: Mr. George Alvarez, Public Services Agency, City of Santa Ana, (714) 647-5659. EXHIBIT "A" - Page 29 of 35 City of Ontario - Dav *eek Imr)rovements This district involved the sale of approximately $15 million in bonds for the construction of the Day Creek drainage channel. It involved approximately 30 properties and a landowner vote which passed by over 90 percent. It is believed to be the first Mello - Roos Community Facilities District undertaken in the State of California for other than a single developer. Tax apportionment reports prepared by Willdan have been cited by several underwriters in their efforts to promote that activity. Contact: Mr. LeRoy Bender, City Engineer, City of Ontario, (714) 986-1151. Citv of Rancho Cucamonga - Mello -Roos Communitv Facilities District This district was implemented concurrently with the above-mentioned Day Creek District in the City of Ontario. This was for extension of the Day Creek project involving approximately $20 million and over 100 separate property owners in a landowner vote. The voters approved the program by a margin of over 80 percent. Contact: Mr. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, City of Rancho Cucamonga, (714) 989-1851. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District - Mello -Roos Communitv Facilities District This was a combination operational and capital improvements community facilities district for the construction and operation of fire suppression facilities. It involved over 150 owners in a landowners vote. The properties were mostly undeveloped but, upon development, will deliver an estimated annual operation tax of over $1 million. Contact: Chief Dennis Michael, Foothill Fire Protection District, (714) 987-2535. Sweetwater Unified High School District - Mello -Roos Communitv Facilities District This single developer program proposes financing and construction of several high schools needed to serve an increased population of approximately 20,000 persons over the next 20 years. Bonds were authorized in the amount of $150 million, being a partial financing mechanism to integrate with other State funds if available. Contact: Mr. Andy Campbell, Director of Development, Sweetwater Unified High School District, (619) 691-5553. EXHIBIT "A" - Page 30 of 35 Chula Vista Elementai School District - Mell Roos Communitv Facilities District This project involved formation of a single developer community facilities district for the construction of elementary schools to serve approximately 10,000 persons over a period of approximately 20 years. Bonds have been authorized in the total amount of $100 million. This program covers the same area as the Sweetwater Unified School District. . Contact: Mr. John Lynn, Business Manager, Chula Vista Elementary School District, (619) 425-9600. EXHIBIT "A" • Page 31 of 35 PROJECT FEE It is our understanding that the City plans to collect a $1,000 fee per building at submittal to offset the costs associated with the plan review and information matrix development process. Based on the inventory list dated 11/30/90, there appears to be 45 buildings that will require a submittal and subsequent review based upon the Ordinance. We propose that the $1,000 fee submitted by each building owner be divided into two categories. Category 11 would be allocated $850. This fee would be reserved for reviewing the structural analysis, conceptual plans, and proposed cost estimates for each individual submittal. Category #2 would be allocated $150 from each separate submittal to develop a total fund of approximately $6,750. This total fee would be used to develop the informational matrix and for project coordination. We propose that Willdan be compensated on an hourly fee basis consistent with Willdan's current Schedule of Hourly Rates for all services performed. A copy of the 1990-91 schedule is enclosed herein. In addition to our staff rates, Willdan's URM Consultant, Mr. Russell, is charged at $90 per hour. On individual projects where the actual cost of performing the review is anticipated to exceed $875 as noted above, actual work in excess of $875, will not be performed or charged without prior authorization by the City. We will keep separate cost information data on each specific plan submittal, information matrix development, and project coordination. Based upon the assumptions and Scope of Services contained herein, it is estimated that Willdan Associates can provide all of the services outlined in the City's Request for Proposal within the $1,000 fee per building. It should be noted that the cost for providing services described in the "Additional Services Available" section of the Scope have not been included. The specific scope and subsequent fees for these services can be further defined if the City decides to utilize these additional services. Unless otherwise desired by the City, Willdan will invoice monthly for services rendered the previous month. EXHIBIT "A" • Page 32 of 35 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES July 1, 1990 - June 30, 1991 Fee Rate Classification Per Hour Enaineerina Sr. Consultant $ 135.00 Principal Engineer 118.00 Division Manager 108.00 City Engineer 108.00 Project Director 105.00 Sr. Engineer 88.00 Sr. Project Manager 88.00 Project Manager 80.00 Associate Engineer 80.00 Sr. Designer (CADD) 80.00 Designer (CARD) 73.00 Supervising Engineer 98.00 Engineering Associate 80.00 Sr. Designer 73.00 Sr. Design Engineer 67.00 Design Engineer 61.00 Sr. Drafter 61.00 Designer 56.00 Sr. Drafter (CADD) 61.00 Drafter (CADD) 56.00 Drafter 49.00 Technical Aide 41.00 Spvsr. - Public Works Observation 77.00 Sr. Public Works Observer 67.00 Public Works Observer 57.00 Real Property Services Sr. Real Property Agent 98.00 Real Property Agent 80.00 Assistant Real Property Agent 67.00 Survevinq Spvsr. Mapping Services 98.00 Sr. Survey Analyst 80.00 Sr. Calculator 80.00 Calculator II 67.00 Calculator I 56.00 Survey Analyst II 67.00 Survey Analyst I 56.00 Spvsr. - Survey 88.00 Survey Party Chief 84.00 Two -Man Field Party 145.00 Three -Man Field Party 190.00 Effective 7/1/90 EXHIBIT "A" • Page 33 of 35 Schedule of Hourly " to July 1990 Page 2 Fee Rate Per Hour Special Districts Spvsr. Special Districts Services $ 98.00 Sr. Special Districts Coordinator 88.00 Special Districts Coordinator 80.00 Special Districts Analyst II 67.00 Special Districts Analyst I 56.00 Plannina Division Manager 108.00 Principal Planner 98.00 Sr. Planner 80.00 Planning Associate 73.00 Planning Assistant 61.00 Planning Technician 45.00 Community Development Services Coordinator 88.00 Sr. Community Development Specialist 73.00 Community Development Specialist 61.00 Buildinq Division Manager 108.00 Supervising Plan Check Engineer 98.00 Plan Check Engineer 79.00 Plans Examiner 68.00 Plans Examiner Aide 44.00 Spvsr. Building Inspector 71.00 Building Inspector 61.00 Sr. Permit Specialist 55.00 Assistant Building Inspector 51.00 Permit Specialist 44.00 Landscape Architecture Principal Landscape Architect 88.00 Sr. Landscape Architect 73.00 Associate Landscape Architect 67.00 Assistant Landscape Architect 56.00 Computer Services Division Manager - Computer Services 108.00 Manager - Computer Operations 80.00 Sr. Software Engineer 67.00 Sr. Program Analyst 67.00 Program Analyst 56.00 Programmer 45.00 Computer Data Entry 42.00 Computer Time 38.00 Other Word Processing 38.00 EXHIBIT "A" - Page 34 of 35 Schedule of Hourly Ra July 1990 Page 3 Consultation in connection with litigation and court appearances will be quoted separately. Additional billing classifications may be added to the above listing during the year as new positions are created. The above schedule is for straight time. Overtime will be charged at 1.25 times the standard hourly rates. Sundays and holidays will be charged at 1.70 times the standard hourly rates. It should be noted that the foregoing wage rates are effective through June 30, 1991. The rates may be adjusted after that date to compensate for labor adjustments and other increases in other costs. 06/06/90 EFFECTIVE 7/1/90 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT "A" • Page 35 of 35