Loading...
PW Southern Heights Bridge Replacement; Amendment 1FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MARK THOMAS AND COMPANY, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE SOUTHERN HEIGHTS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to the Professional Services Agreement by and between the CITY OF SAN RAFAEL (hereinafter "CITY"), and MARK THOMAS AND COMPANY, INC., (hereinafter "CONSULTANT"), is made and entered into as of the ?brl-l- day of J)EceMge~ 2017. RECITALS WHEREAS, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 14129, the CITY and CONSULTANT entered into a Professional Services Agreement dated June 7, 2016 to perfOlm preliminary engineering and public outreach for an amount not to exceed $241,568.00 (the "Agreement"); and WHEREAS, CITY requires final design and right of way services from the CONSULTANT to finalize the design and obtain Right of Way Certification through Caltrans Office of Local Assistance, and the CONSULTANT is willing to provide such services; AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 1. Article II of the Agreement, entitled "STATEMENT OF WORK" is hereby amended to include the additional services set forth in CONSULTANT's proposals entitled "Phase 2 -Final Design" and "Phase 3 -Right of Way" dated November 17, 2017, attached to this First Amendment as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. 2. Article V of the Agreement, entitled "ALLOWABLE COSTS AND PAYMENTS" is hereby amended to include additional compensation payable to CONSULTANT for the services described in Exhibit "A" to this First Amendment, on a time and materials basis in accordance with the "Cost Proposal for Project Scope" included in Exhibit "A", in a not-to-exceed amount of $343,499 for Phases 2 and 3, and to change the total not-to-exceed amount under the Agreement to $585,067.00. 3. Except as specifically amended herein, all of the other provisions, telms and obligations of the Agreement between the parties shall remain valid and shall be in full force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment on the day, month, and year first above written. CITY OF SAN RAFAEL c~ L-0S JIm Schutz, City Manager ATTEST: ~+t::ii:il. C ~ /~ ,e ~ ~ ESTHER C. BEIRNE, City Clerk 2 MARK THOMAS AND COMPANY, INC. By:~.J.+-A Name: ~\7eM ~ · 'm~ Title: ~lQ-e.....L1 and By: (2,an.6~ Name: {he,-It 'gr"tJrA'A Title: Sec ,...e~ ~ ... MARK • THOMAS PHASE 2 -FINAL DESIGN Scope of Work -Southern Heights Bridge Replacement City of San Rafael November 17 , 2017 EXHIBIT A For this HBP project, the Mark Thomas team will follow the scope of work below for the Southern Heights Bridge Replacement Project in the City of San Rafael. Based on our previous work on the project, the following scope items are necessary to accomplish our proposed work approach . Mark Thomas will diligently perform this scope of work and will be responsible for items of work under this contract to the extent that issues arising from the performance of these services are within our reasonable control, and that Mark Thomas' obligation to indemnify and defend are limited to the extent actually caused by Ma r k Thomas in the performance of this scope of work. Phase 1 of the project (Tasks 1 through 5) included project initiation, surveying and base mapping, geotechnical investigation, public outreach, preliminary engineering, and environmental technical studies . Phase 2 of the project will carry the project forward through final design and environmental clearance. TASK 6.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION Mark Thomas will continue to provide overall management of the project, including approvals for final design, environmental clearance, and coordination with the City and other stakeholders. 6.1 Project Management Mark Thomas will provide continued management of subconsultants in the performance of their work. Management activities shall also include maintenance of a critical path method (CPM) design schedule and progress reports to be distributed monthly. The schedule will be updated as progress is made, with critical path activities clearly shown for team review purposes . The schedule and billings shall be submitted in the form and in sufficient detail to track the project status and contract expenditures as outlined by the City at the beginning of the project. 6.2 Project Development Team Meetings Project Development Team (PDT) meetings will be held at the City offices. Three PDT meetings are proposed during this phase of the scope of work. Mark Thomas will prepare agendas for each meeting and distribute them to the PDT prior to each meeting. Mark Thomas will facilitate meetings and prepare meeting minutes with action items. Mark Thomas will endeavor to schedule these meetings to coincide with preparations for public meetings and the submittal of design packages. 6.3 Quality Control The Mark Thomas Quality Control plan consists of established procedures for performing the work (which are reassessed with each project), including methods for design calculations, establishing appropriate levels of design development for intermediate submittals, identification of required plan checks, design checklists, and methods of project documentation. Our QC/QA Manager will implement and maintain these quality control procedures during the preparation of plans and documents throughout final design. Task 6 Oeliverables: • Monthly Invoices and Status Reports • Project Schedule & Updates (MS Project) • PDT Meeting Agendas and Minutes (Up to 3) ~~ MARK THOMAS TASK 7.0 DESIGN 7.1 Utility Coordination Scope of Work -Southern Heights Bridge Replacement City of San Rafael November 17, 2017 Mark Thomas will continue to provide utility coordination for the project to address potential relocations of utility poles and overhead electric and communications lines and to accommodate utilities on the bridge including natural gas and water. Coordination with utilities for temporary service during construction will be included for relocated or rerouted facilities. Due to the federal funding associated with the project, utility coordination services will be conducted in general conformance with Caltrans Local Assistance and Utility Relocation Manuals. The Mark Thomas team will follow the Utility A-B-C process and will prepare the required utility certification documents (ROI, NTO, UA). Utility A letters were included as part of Phase 1 scope of work. The remainder of the utility coordination process will be completed in Phase 2. B -Mark Thomas will compare project utility mapping with proposed improvements and determine which existing facilities may require relocation. Mark Thomas will draft signature-ready utility notification letters to utility companies for City signatures. Utility Notification letters will identify limits of relocation and proportionate cost sharing. C -Mark Thomas will work with Utility companies to get utility agreements drafted for City signatures. Utility agreements will be negotiated on behalf of the City as appropriate. 7.2 Geotechnical Investigation 7.2.1 Draft & Final Foundation Report Parikh will prepare preliminary recommendations for the proposed bridge foundations including results of the analyses completed in Phase 1. The format will follow Caltrans guidelines for preparing Bridge Foundation reports. Using the general plan as a base map, boring logs will be provided using the standard Caltrans LOTB sheets. The final report will include design recommendations for the bridge foundation based on review comments and any updates subsequent to the draft report preparation. 7 .3 65% Submittal 7.3.1 65% Roadway Plans Mark Thomas will prepare draft engineering plans for the roadway approaches based upon the approved preliminary roadway plans. The plans will include typical sections, layouts, profiles, construction details, drainage plans, utility plans, traffic control plans and signing and striping plans. In general, it is anticipated that the following plan sheets will be prepared: .... .... I ~f ••• :G1l!JI~ • ru:.&JS Title Sheet 1 Typical Sections 1 Project Control Diagram 1 Layout/Profile (1" = 20') 1 Construction Details 2 Drainage Plan 1 Utility Plan 1 Traffic Handling/Stage Construction 1 Signing/Striping 1 Total Roadway Plan Sheets 10 ~ ..... MARK • THOMAS 7.3.2 65% Structure Plans Scope of Work -Southern Heights Bridge Replacement City of San Rafael November 17, 2017 Mark Thomas will prepare structural calculations and bridge plans for the three-span, cast-in-place, reinforced concrete slab bridge. At the 65% submittal, Mark Thomas will submit a complete, unchecked set of bridge plans to the City . The structure design will be performed in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 6th Edition with Caltrans Amendments and Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria, Version 1.7. The latest updated versions of the Caltrans Bridge Design Manuals will be used. In general, it is anticipated that the following plan sheets will be prepared: -\ IDl:r.t:I: "--W~ ,~ General Plan 1 Deck Contours 1 Foundation Plan 1 Abutment Layout 2 Abutment Details 2 Bent Layout 1 Bent Details 1 Slab Reinforcement 1 Slab Reinforcement Details 1 Bridge Railing 1 Miscellaneous Details 2 Log of Test Borings 2 Total Structure Plan Sheets 16 7.33 65% Wall Plans Mark Thomas will prepare structural calculations and wall plans for the solider pile wall. At the 65% submittal, Mark Thomas will submit a complete, unchecked set of wall plans to the City. The structure design will be performed i n accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 6th Edition with Caltrans Amendments and Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria, Version 1.7. The latest updated versions of the Caltrans Bridge Design Manuals will be used. In general, it is anticipated that the following plan sheets will be prepared: ~~ --WL!m:::.u":'::":' General Plan 1 Foundation Plan 1 Wall Layout 1 Wall Details 3 Total Wall Plan Sheets 6 7.4 Final Design 7.4.1 95% Roadway Plans Comments from the 65% Plans will be addressed and incorporated into the 95% design. Responses to comments received on the 65% plans will be prepared and submitted to the City . The roadway design will be advanced to a 95% level and will include construction areas signs sheet, additional detailing for roadway and/or driveway conforms, grading, lighting (optional task), and drainage details. 7.4.2 95% Structure Plans Mark Thomas will perform an independent design check of the bridge plans in conformance with Caltrans bridge design procedures. The independent check will be completed by an experienced registered engineer who was not involved in ......... MARK •• THOMAS Scope of Work -Southern Heights Bridge Replacement City of San Rafael November 17, 2017 the original design of the structure. Calculations and computer runs will be performed to check the bridge layout and structural integrity. A plan set will be marked up in two colors, yellow indicating approved items and red indicating items to be discussed. Upon completion of the design check, discrepancies between the designer and checker will be reconciled and plans updated for preparation of final quantities, estimate and specifications. Mark Thomas will incorporate the City's comments on the 65% submittal and submit responses in writing for the 95% submittal. 7.4.3 95% Wall Plans Mark Thomas will perform an independent design check of the wall plans in conformance with Caltrans bridge design procedures. The independent check will be completed by an experienced registered engineer who was not involved in the original design of the structure. Calculations and computer runs will be performed to check the wall layout and structural integrity. A plan set will be marked up in two colors, yellow indicating approved items and red indicating items to be discussed. Upon completion of the design check, discrepancies between the designer and checker will be reconciled and plans updated for preparation of final quantities, estimate and specifications. Mark Thomas will incorporate the City's comments on the 65% submittal and submit responses in writing for the 95% submittal. 7.4.4 Special Provisions Mark Thomas will develop project special provisions using 2015 Caltrans Standard Specifications. The special provisions will be prepared using Microsoft Word. Special provisions will be submitted at the 95% and 100% (Final) submittals. The City's bOilerplate contract language will be incorporated into the specifications. In conformance with the 2015 Standard Plans, measurement and payment clauses will not be included in technical specifications . 7.4.5 Engineer's Estimate Mark Thomas will develop quantities and prepare construction cost estimates using the project geometries and surfaces developed from survey information . Cost estimates will be calculated at the 65%, 95%, and Final submittals. Construction costs will be developed using current bid results from similar projects, Caltrans data base information and from Caltrans latest Construction Cost Manual. All estimates will be done in Caltrans BEES format using Microsoft Excel. 7.4.6 Final PS&E Comments from the 95% Plans will be addressed and incorporated into the final design. Responses to comments received on the 95% plans will be prepared and submitted to the City. All final plan revisions will be made. Updates to the specifications and estimate will be completed. Final contract documents will be provided to the City for project advertisement. Task 7 Deliverables: • Utility Band C Plan Letters • Draft/Final Foundation Report • Plans (65%, 95%, and Final) • Special Provisions (95% and Final) • Engineer's Estimate (65%, 95%, and Final) TASK 8.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE 8.1 Prepare NEPA Categorical Exclusion For processing NEPA, LSA will complete the Categorical Exclusion (CE) Checklist and prepare a Section 6004 CE Determination form (available on Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference page). A summary document (two to three ~ ... MARK THOMAS Scope of Work -Southern Heights Bridge Replacement City of San Rafael November 17 , 2017 pages) of the environmental issues and project findings will be attached to the CEo The completed form will be submitted to Caltrans with the final technical studies (revised per City and Caltrans comments) to support the findings of the CE o If, during the course of the preliminary planning and environmental study preparation, additional unforeseen environmental constraints or project impacts are identified that would necessitate the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) to address NEPA requirements, a budget augment would be necessary . 8.2 Prepare Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration The bridge project will be processed through the use of an IS/MND for CEQA purposes . Technical Studies prepared for NEPA review will serve as the backup for the CEQA IS/MND . 8.2.1 Administrative Draft IS/MND LSA will prepare an IS/MND for City review . The format will be based on the CEQA Initial Study checklist and an expanded evaluation of each issue area. Included in the IS/MND will be a project description, discussion of the environmental review process, and project methodology . Three copies will be printed for review by the City. 8.2.2 Preliminary Draft IS/MND Following review by the City, LSA will prepare a Preliminary Draft IS/MND. This second version will address each of the City's comments on the Administrative Draft IS/MND. Three copies ofthe Preliminary Draft IS/MND will be submitted for review by the City. 8.2.3 Public Review Draft IS/MND The purpose of this task will be to respond to the City's comments on the Preliminary Draft IS/MND, complete necessary revisions, submit the document for City approval, and publish for public review . Thirty copies ofthe Draft IS/MND will be provided to the City to ci rculate for public review . It is expected that the City will be responsible for publishing all legal notices and advertisements. LSA will assist the City in the preparation of notices including the notice of availability for public review, public notice of intent to adopt the MND, and the Notice of Completion for the State Clearinghouse . 8.2.4 Response to Comments on Preliminary Final MND The purpose of this task is to prepare written responses to comments received on the Draft IS/MND that raise significant environmental issues and submit them for City staff review after the close of the public comment period. LSA will also include a Mitigation Monitoring Program in the document that outlines timing and responsibility assignments for implementing each measure. Two copies of the Mitigation Monitoring Program will be submitted separately to the City . 8.2.5 Final MND LSA will incorporate the final comments and responses into the Final MND and will submit 20 copies of the approved document for distribution by the City to agencies and individuals that commented on the Draft IS/MND. Final adjustments to the Mitigation Monitoring Program will be made based on staff review and comment. Task 8 Deliverables: • NEPA CE Checklist • Administrative Draft IS/MND • Publ ic Review Draft IS/MND • FinaIIS/MND ~~ MARK • THOMAS TASK 9.0 CONSTRUCTABILTY REVIEW 9.1 Constructability Review Scope of Work -Southern Heights Bridge Replacement City of Sa n Rafael November 17, 2017 After receiving the 65% submittal, Quincy Engineering, Inc . (QEI) will visit the project site with the City and Mark Thomas to identify potential construction issues . QEI will review the 65% documents from a construction point of view as follows: • Ambiguous, contradictory, or missing details • Sufficient information adequately shown so that the project is biddable and buildable • Access and existing facility impacts • Utility and right of way impacts • Adequacy of permanent right of way and TCE • Foundation compatibility with the LOTB and Foundation Report • Bridge and approach roadway plan compatibility • Reasonable construction schedule As a summary of QEl's review findings, a 65% CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW CHECKLIST will be developed. QEI will be available to discuss the items identified with the City and Mark Thomas staff via phone . Follow up comments can be incorporated into the checklist. 9 .2 95% PS&E Review (OPTIONAL) After receiving the 95% PS&E Submittal along with any utility agreements, QEI will review the documents from a construction point of view as follows: • Item list, technical specifications, and engineer's estimate comparison • Payment clauses • Potential contractor and owner risks As a summary of QEl's review findings, a 95% CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW CHECKLIST will be developed and provided to the City and Mark Thomas . Task 9 Deliverables: • 65% Constructability Review Checklist • 95% Constructability Review Checklist (OPTIONAL) PROJECT ASSUMPTIONS This scope of work has been prepared using the following assumptions: • The project will be advertised, awarded, and administered by the City and the City will coordinate reproductions of the bid package. • No Design Exceptions will be required. • Project duration from notice to proceed for Phase 2 through final PS&E is no more than 12 months. • No regulatory permits will be required for the project. ~AIII MAR K THOMAS PHASE 3 -RIGHT OF WAY Scope of Work -Southern Heights Bridge Replacement City of San Rafael November 17.2017 Phase 1 of the project (Tasks 1 through 5) included project i nitiation, surveying and base mapping, geotechnical investigation, public outreach, preliminary engineering, and environmental technical studies . Phase 2 of the project (Tasks 6 through 9) included final design and environmental clearance. Phase 3 will carry the project forward through the right of way process . TASK 10.0 RIGHT OF WAY SERVICES It is anticipated that permanent property acquisition will not be required for the proposed project. However, there will be need to obtain temporary right of entry to adjacent properties during the construction and potential need to acquire temporary construction easements (TCE's). Mark Thomas' subconsultant, Hamner, Jewel & Associates (HJA), will provide right of way acquisition services to the City to support preparation of right of entry agreements and TCE's. All right of way activities will follow Caltrans Div ision of Local Assistance procedures. 10.1 TCE Exhibits and Descriptions Once right-of-way needs have been identified, Mark Thomas will prepare (11"xl7") exhibits for the six impacted parcels . These exhibits will show the impacted area laid over an aerial photograph . Areas of temporary easement and encumbrances will be shown to assist in the appraisal process. Additionally, Mark Thomas will prepare up to six legal descriptions with 8-1/2" x 11" plats for Temporary Construction Easements. A draft of each legal description and exhibit drawing will be submitted to the City for review and comments. The legal description and exhibit plat will be stamped and signed only after City approval. 10.2 Temporary Construction Easements HJA will identify affected property owners; prepare nominal value wavers for up to three TCE's and appraisals for up to three additional TCE's . Once the valuation/appraisal process is complete, and the values are reviewed and pre-approved by the City, HJA will prepare offer packages for each owner that would include an offer letter, Valuation/Appraisal Summary Statement, proposed ROW Agreement and Temporary Construct ion Easement Deed, and a right of way acquisition informational brochure. These documents would be presented to the City for its review and pre-approval prior to presenting offers to property owners. After offer presentation, HJA would pursue agreements with each owner to finalize the right of way transfers. It is always our goal to reach mutually acceptable amicable agreements on the City's behalf, and we have a very high success rate of doing so, however if for any reason we do not gain property owner cooperation, we would consult w ith the project team and City Attorney if appropriate to identify optional courses of action. This scope is based on the understanding that no structures will be impacted and no occupant displacements will occur. No permanent rights will be required . Task 10 Oeliverables: • Plats & Legal Descr i ptions -Up to six (6) TCE's • Nominal Value Waivers -Up to three (3) parcels • Appraisals -Up to three (3) parcels • Acquisitions -Up to six (6) TCE's COST PROPOSAL FOR PROJECT SCOPE: San Rafael-Southern Heights Bridge Replacement-Phase 2 & 3 ~~ MARK THOMAS PHASE 2 -FINAL DESIGN 6_0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT & COORDINATION 6.1 Project Management 6_2 Project Development Team Meetings 6.3 Quality Control Subtotal Phase 6 7.0 DESIGN 7.1 Utility Coordination 7.2 Geotechnical Investigation 7.3 65% Submittal 7.3.1 65% Roadway Plans 7.3.2 65% Structure Plans 7.3.3 65% Wall Plans 7.4 Final Desllll 7.4.1 95% Roadway Plans 7.4.2 95% Structure Plans 7.4.3 95% Wall Plans 7.4.4 Special Provisions 7.4.5 Engineer's Estimate 7 .4.6 Final PS&E 5ubtolill Phase 7 8.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE 8.1 Prepare NEPA categorical Exclusion Prepare Initial Study/Mitigated Negative 8.2 Declaration Subtotal Phase 8 9.0 CONSTRUCTA81LITV REVIEW 9.1 ConstructabUlty Review 9.2 95% PS&E Review (OPTIONAL) Subtolill Phase 9 ITOTAL HOURS OTHER DIRECT COSTS iTOTAL COST -PHASE 2 PHASE 3 -RIGHT OF WAY 10.0 RIGHT OF WAY 5ERVICES 10.1 TCE Exhibits and Descriptions 10.2 Temporary Construction Easements Subtolill Phase 10 TOTAL HOURS OTHER DIRECT COSTS TOTAL COST -PHASE 3 ~ ::. l! i !' "C ~ ! $247 24 12 20 56 8 20 36 6 o 98 ~ : c .. ~ 11 .. l $172 20 20 o o o 20 ." ~ 1§ "i: -5 ~ $172 12 12 24 20 40 24 24 8 12 128 8 o 160 ~ !' .. 11 u l $125 o 100 80 80 60 16 16 12 364 o o 364 ~ ~ E ~ .!l $111 o 40 80 60 40 40 260 o o 260 c .. :!! c ~ $77 o 60 160 80 40 80 40 40 500 o o 500 $24,2061 $3,4401 $27,5201 $45,5001 $28,8601 $38,500 4 4 4 2 8 0 6 0 0 0 8 0 6 0 0 0 $1,976 $0 $1,032 $0 $0 $0 Mark Thomas u !! i ~ oil $185 o o o o o $0 32 8 40 40 $7,400 I " '" 11 f ... $145 o o o o o $0 64 32 96 96 $13,920 c .. :!! c ~ I $90 o o o o o c o .. "5 ~ Q ~ o .. :::J Ii S~ $184 o 4 10 o o 10 ~ 0' ~ ~ ~ o .. :::J Ii S~ $147 o 24 16 8 48 o o 48 ~ ~ l! 8 11 .. e ... $86 3D 30 o o o 30 $01 $1,8401 $7,0561 $2,580 120 56 176 0 0 0 176 0 0 0 $15,840 $0 $0 $0 Total TOIilI MT Hours Cost 66 $10,572 24 $5,028 40 $8,380 130 $23,980 60 $7,880 o $0 o $0 180 $20,380 296 $31,060 160 $16,160 o $0 1241 $13,868 2001 $24,188 1001 $10,580 401 $6,128 681 $8,804 1181 $13,616 13461 $152,664 o $0 14 $2,858 14 $2,858 o $0 o $0 o $0 1490 $1,800 $181,302 224 $27,676 102 $12,492 326 $40,168 326 $40,168 Subconsultants Ii ~ u .. ":!! e-! E 51 ~< DBE $0 $0 ~ DBE $0 $0 2,170 31,301 $01 $33,471 $0 $0 $1,300 $01 $34,771 38,855 $38,855 $0 $14,725 $53,580 $0 !! J! o 1! :i u E I; II ~~ :Ii "C ~ & Non-DBE ::. DBE Non-DBE $0 $0 $0 16,771 $01 $16,771 $0 $0 $0 $0 10,717 6,190 $0 $01 $16,907 $01 $16,7711 $16,907 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $10,572 $5,028 $8,380 $23,980 $7,880 $16,771 $0 $20,380 $31,060 $16,160 $0 $13,868 $24,188 $10,580 $6,128 $8,804 $13,616 $169,435 $2,170 $34,159 $36,329 $10,717 $6,190 $16,907 $3,100 $249,751 $27,676 $51,347 $79,023 $14,725 $93,748 11117/2017 CONTRACT ROUTING FORM INSTRUCTIONS: Use this cover sheet to circulate all contracts for review and approval in the order shown below. TO BE COMPLETED BY INITIATING DEPARTMENT PROJECT MANAGER: Contracting Department: Public Works Project Manager: Hunter Young Extension: 3408 Contractor Name: Mark Thomas and Company Contractor's Contact: Julie Passalacqua Contact's Email: jpassalacqua@markthomas.com o FPPC: Check if Contractor/Consultant must file Form 700 Step RESPONSIBLE DESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT 1 Project Manager a. Email PINS Introductory Notice to Contractor b. Email contract (in Word) & attachments to City Atty c/o Laraine .Gittens@cityofsanrafael.org 2 City Attorney a. Review, revise, and comment on draft agreement and return to Project Manager b. Confirm insurance requirements, create Job on PINS, send PINS insurance notice to contractor 3 Project Manager Forward at least two originals of final agreement to contractor for their signature 4 Project Manager When necessary, * contractor-signed agreement agendized for Council approval *PSA> $20,000 ; or Purchase> $35,000; or Public Works Contract> $125 ,000 Date of Council approval PRINT CONTINUE ROUTING PROCESS WITH HARD COPY 5 Project Manager Forward signed original agreements to City Attorney with printed copy of this routing form 6 City Attorney Review and approve hard copy of signed agreement 7 City Attorney Review and approve insurance in PINS and, and bonds (for Public Works Contracts) 8 City Manager / Mayor Agreement executed by Council authorized official 9 City Clerk Attest signatures, retains original agreement and forwards copies to Project Manager COMPLETED DATE Click here to enter a date. 11/21/2017 11/30/2017 11/30/2017 11/30/2017 0 N/A Or 12/18/2017 12/6/2017 rU(~l- l'lA 'UL- li/z~ di/(~ REVIEWER Check/Initial 0 ~ HY ~ LG ~ LG ~ HY ~HY ~ HY ~~t UI,U·1. CJ- &JS.