Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Resolution 12814 (Critical Facilities Committee Final Report)RESOLUTION NO. 12814 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL ACCEPTING THE FINAL REPORT FROM THE CRITICAL FACILITIES COMMITTEE WHEREAS, The City Council appointed a Critical Facilities Committee via Resolution No. 12381 on November 19, 2007, and WHEREAS, the Critical Facilities Committee was established in order to develop strategies for informing and educating the community about the current state of our buildings as well as develop an implementation plan to advance the priorities set by the former Critical Facilities Strategy Committee, and WHEREAS, the Critical Facilities Committee has met faithfully since November 29, 2007, spending numerous hours understanding the City's finances; explored debt financing, tax solutions and other funding options; engaged with subject matter experts and developed a communication plan in order to inform our residents and businesses about the current state of our essential facilities, and WHEREAS, the Critical Facilities Committee prepared an Interim Report and presented their work to the community and City Council at a study session on May 5, 2008, and WHEREAS, the Critical Facilities Committee also prepared a Progress Report in order to codify their accomplishments to date, delineate findings and conclusions and propose a series of recommendations, which was accepted by the City Council on August 4, 2008, and WHEREAS, the City Council actions of August 4, 2008 extended the initial term of the Critical Facilities Committee until July, 2009, in order for the Committee to fully accomplish their two primary goals as noted above, and 10 WHEREAS, the Critical Facilities Committee has conducted, in conjunction with staff and consulting expertise, a feasibility and education effort, along with receiving public opinion polling results regarding city facilities perceptions and needs , and WHEREAS, the Critical Facilities Committee has deliberated over a series of recommendations, based upon data and other information, in order to prepare a final report to the City Council and fulfill their work as a Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby: 1. Accept the August 3, 2009 Final Report of the Critical Facilities Committee, a copy of which is attached hereto, and 2. Acknowledge the commitment, knowledge, leadership and community volunteerism of Committee members; their collective efforts resulting in a series of recommendations that lay the groundwork for resolving needed modernization, upgrading and replacement of many of the City of San Rafael's most critical buildings. I, ESTHER C. BEIRNE, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on Monday, the 3`d day of August, 2009 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Brockbank, Connolly, Heller, Miller & Mayor Boro NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None t e . E ........... ESTHER C. BEIRNE, City Clerk WACity Managers- WorkFile\Council Material\Resolutions\2009\CFC final report reso.doc City of San Rafael Critical Facilities Committee Final Report August 3, 2009 Mayor Al Boro and Members of the San Rafael City Council H li'. ��:)s Y ... On November 19, 2007, you appointed 15 San Rafael citizens to form a new Critical Facilities Committee (CFC) to "develop strategies for informing and educating the community about the current state of our buildings as well as (to) develop an implementation plan to advance the priorities set by the former Critical Facilities Strategy Committee (CFSC)." The appointed CFC adopted an aggressive work schedule, first meeting on November 29, 2007. We have been meeting roughly twice a month since that date. .M IC ,..aD, � Ie V✓ ,. I �A:M • Reviewed and discussed the report prepared by the former CFSC. • Received detailed briefing from Group 4 Architects including updated costs for the options recommended by the former CFSC. • Received detailed briefings from key staff on the city budget history, as well as current budget structure and condition. • Received detailed briefings from staff and consultants on financing options and analyzing in particular general obligation bonds and parcel taxes with attention to the need for furnishing and fixtures and a capital replacement reserve. • Received information from consultants Elliot Levin and Peter Winder regarding public-private partnerships. • Examined alternative procurement methods such as Design/Build, Public Private Partnerships, and Request for Concept. • Explored alternative funding opportunities, including MCF and ARRA resources. • Conducted with assistance from Godbe Research Group and Tramutola LLC a Phase 1 Feasibility Study. The study consisted of public polling in February 2009 that tested citizen awareness of the current condition of public safety, library and community center buildings. Polling also tested citizen support for a general obligation bond in an amount sufficient to pay for needed facility improvements. — 1 — • Developed and began implementing a Communication Plan including a published Marin Voice piece, a video presentation, website information, and public tours of facilities aimed at educating our community about San Rafael Critical Facility needs. • Participated in an education effort to raise voter awareness of facility needs, which included Committee members and other volunteers walking neighborhoods and talking directly to San Rafael voters. • Reviewed results of polling conducted by Godbe Research Group in June 2009 to assess the effectiveness of the education efforts, Communication Plan and potential voter support for a tax to fund facility upgrades and future capital replacement needs. Our Findings and Conclusions: A. Due to the age of City buildings and the changes in City services and needs over time, the City's facilities are functionally obsolete, seismically unsafe and do not comply with a wide variety of building codes. B. We find that no funds presently exist to undertake a capital project of the scope needed, and that voter approved funding must be obtained. C. With the addition of the Library to the scope of projects, we developed a prioritization for facility renovation, expansion or replacement: 1.) Public Safety Building — Police, Fire, EOC, plus needed City Hall seismic upgrading, reuse of vacated Police space and provision of required additional parking 2.) Fire Station # 2 / Training Facility 3.) Downtown Library 4.) Fire Stations #4, #5 & #7 5.) Fire Station #6 6.) Terra Linda Community Center 7.) "B" Street Community Center D. Based upon a recent education effort and July 2009 polling results we conclude that: a. Voter misconceptions about the condition of City facilities will continue to be a hurdle and require ongoing educational and awareness efforts. b. Education efforts have been successful in increasing voter awareness of the actual conditions of the City's buildings. c. Although public support for a tax measure to upgrade or replace the Downtown Main Library is insufficient to warrant proceeding with a ballot measure at this time, the Downtown Library expansion and improvements should remain a priority. d. Public support for a public safety facilities general obligation bond measure has a greater chance of success than would a parcel tax. �2� E. We conclude that a capital replacement reserve fund is needed to ensure the facilities remain functional and code compliant over their useful lives. F. We conclude that the education effort undertaken in 2009 did create sufficient public support to upgrade the public safety buildings in order to place a ballot measure before the voters in November, 2009. G. We conclude that the education effort undertaken in 2009 did not create sufficient public support to upgrade the Downtown Library in order to place a ballot measure before the voters in November, 2009. H. We conclude that the education effort undertaken in 2009 did not create sufficient public support to upgrade the San Rafael and Terra Linda Community Centers in order to place a ballot measure before the voters in November, 2009. Recommendations: We recommend the San Rafael City Council: 1. Put before the voters, in November, 2009, a ballot measure authorizing the City to issue up to $89 million in general obligation bonds, and impose a tax sufficient to upgrade, renovate and replace public safety buildings. The general obligation bonds should include sufficient funds to allow for the long term planning and design of core downtown City facilities. 2. Pursue financing for the upgrade, renovation or expansion of the downtown main library after securing the required financing for the public safety buildings listed in our prioritization above. 3. Defer action on the replacement or renovation of the community center buildings until a later date and after securing the required financing for the public safety and downtown library buildings. 4. Adopt as a formal policy for the creation, maintenance, and regular funding of the capital replacement reserve for the facilities described above in this report. 5. In response to opportunities or unanticipated challenges, retain the flexibility to implement solutions for all of these facilities even when not in the order of our prioritization. By way of example, the Committee has supported the City's efforts to work with the County of Marin on a combined Fire Station No. 7/Emergency Operations Facility solution at the Civic Center. Refer to our letter included as part of this report. 6. Not be precluded from considering relocation of these facilities if conditions warrant. 7. Pursue all available avenues for private, or public, agency grants, partnerships or other sources of money to augment the funding raised through any tax measure. 8. Include a provision for the appointment of a Citizen's Oversight Committee in any ballot measures to be put before the San Rafael voters. �3� Attachments: o Communication Plan o August 2008 Progress Report o Letter Regarding Station 7 & County EOF �4� Respectfully Submitted, Mark Luba rsky (Chair) Phil Abey Gladys (f'Gilliland Kevin J. Kroncke Larr�lye am Kdren Nielsen Sean Prendiville Gordon B. Manashil (Vice -Chair) D i LJ��1 /Brinckerhoff -5-