HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 1474 (Bayview Business Park)I
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
I, JEANNE M. LEONCINI, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, and
Ex -officio Clerk of the Council of said City, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Charter Ordinance No. 1474 entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTED BY
REFERENCE BY SECTION 14.15.020 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF SAN
RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA, SO AS TO RECLASSIFY CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
FROM "U" AND P -C -M (UNCLASSIFIED AND PLANNED COMMERCIAL LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT TO P -D (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ) DISTRICT
(Francisco Blvd., south of Pelican Way)
(BAYVIEW BUSINESS PARK)
is a true and correct copy of an ordinance of said City and was
introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of San Rafael, held on the third day of
January 19 84published as required by City Charter in the
Independent -Journal a newspaper published in the City
of San Rafael and passed and adopted as an ordinance of said City at
a regular meeting of the City Council of said City
held on the sixteenth day of January 19 84 by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom & Mayor Mulryan
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILbLEMBERS: None
WITNESS my hand and the official seal
of the City of San Rafael this
nineteenth day of January
1984.
JEAN , ,. LEONCINI,ity Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 1474
AN ORDINANCE -OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL AMENDING THE
ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTED BY REFERENCE BY SECTION 14.15.020 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE OF SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA, SO AS TO
RECLASSIFY CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FROM "U" AND P -C -M
(UNCLASSIFIED AND PLANNED COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
DISTRICTS TO P -D (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT
(Francisco Blvd., south of Pelican Way)
(BAYVIEW BUSINESS PARK)
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
DIVISION 1. The Zoning Map of the City of San Rafael,
California, adopted by reference by Section 14.15.020 of the Muni-
cipal Code is amended by reclassifying the following real property
from "U" and P -C -M (Unclassified and Planned Commercial Light
Industrial) Districts to P -D (Planned Development) District. Said
property so reclassified is located on Francisco Boulevard south of
Pelican Way, San Rafael, County Assessor's Parcels 9-290-31 and 34
described in Exhibit "B".
DIVISION 2. Any development of this property shall be
subject to the conditions outlined in Exhibit "A" which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof.
DIVISION 3. This Ordinance shall be published once in full
before its final passage in a newspaper of general circulation,
published and circulated in the City of San Rafael, and shall be in
full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage.
LAWRENC ,
Attest:
/H
J ANNE M. LEONCI City Clerk
- 1 -
E. MULRYAN, ' Mayor
yORDINANCE NO. 1474
The foregoing Ordinance No. 1474 was read and intro-
duced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
San Rafael, held on the 3rd day of January , 1984, and
ordered passed to print by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS• Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom & Mayor Mulryan
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:None
and will come up for adoption as an Ordinance of the City of San
Rafael at a regular meeting of the Council to be held on the
16th day of January , 1984.
26.2 A/1
JEA�.LEOA'&�,45tityyClerl
- 2 -
EXHIBIT "A"
Conditions which were included as part of the zoning
(Z82-16) action by the Planning Commission on October 25, 1983.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
(a) Plans and Permits
l) Engineered improvement plans shall be submitted with the applications for
building permits (due to phasing of construction).
2) The final finish floor elevations shall be subject to approval by the
City Engineer.
3) Unless overturned by appeal to the City Council, "handicapped access"
requirements must be complied with as a condition of building permit
issuance.
(b) Grading and Earthwork
1) The final grading plans shall be prepared in accordance with the recom-
mendations of the report prepared by Don Herzog and Associates, dated
May 6, 1983.
2) Grading, drainage and foundation plans shall be reviewed and signed by
the soils engineer.
3) The final site and building plans shall be reviewed by a Waste Management
Consultant to insure that proper methane mitigation measures have been
incorporated into the designs. A written report shall be submitted with
the application for building permits.
4) Prior to issuance of building permits, the final plans and reports shall
be submitted to the Geotechnical Review Board. The applicant shall make
a deposit with the City Engineer to cover the cost of this review.
5) All earth and foundation work shall be done under the direction of a soils
engineer; and a final report shall be submitted prior to acceptance of
the work.
(c) Storm Drainage
1) The improvement plans shall show all existing and proposed drainage facil-
ities.
2) The gradient of all storm drain systems shall be designed to accommodate
predicted settlements. The improvement plans shall show profiles and grades
before and after settlement.
3) Storm drainage facilities shall be constructed of flexible, watertight
materials to accommodate predicted settlement and to preclude methane
intrusion. The system shall be as recommended by the soils engineer and
approved by the City Engineer.
4) Runoff from improved areas shall be collected and conveyed to the street
by underground conduit and/or under sidewalk drains. Drainage shall not
be diverted or concentrated onto adjoining properties; or over sidewalks
and driveways.
5) The proposed drainage system is approved in concept only. The final con-
figuration shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer.
(d) Sanitary Sewers
1) The improvement plans shall show the location of all existing and proposed
sanitary sewer facilities.
2) Each of the proposed buildings shall be served with an individual 4 -inch
sewer lateral and/or a commonly maintained private lateral of not less than
6 -inches in diameter.
3) The gradient of all gravity sanitary sewers shall be designed to accommodate
predicted settlements. The improvement plans shall show profiles and grades
before and after settlement.
4) On-site sanitary sewer facilities shall be constructed of flexible, water-
tight materials to accommodate predicted settlement and to preclude methane
intrusion. The system shall be as recommended by the soils enuineer and
approved by the City Engineer.
(e)
Streets and Roads
1)
The improvement plans shall show the horizontal and vertical alignment of
roadways. This shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department and
the City Traffic Engineer.
2)
Right-of-way for the construction of Kerner Boulevard and Pelican Way
shall be dedicated to the City in fee.
3)
The roadways shall be constructed to the approved street widths identified
in the Redevelopment Plan.
4)
All roadways shall have structural sections based upon a Traffic Index
determined by the City Traffic Engineer.
5)
The final roadway design shall be reviewed by the soils engineer and shall
be subject to approval of the City Engineer.
(f)
Frontaqe Improvements
1)
The improvement plans shall show all proposed and existing frontage improve-
ments.
2)
New curb, gutter and sidewalk shall be installed along the entire Kerner
Boulevard, Pelican Way and Francisco Boulevard frontages.
(g)
Utilities
1)
The improvement plans shall show all existing and proposed utilities.
2)
All utility services shall be underground.
3)
Street lights shall be installed. The number, location and type of lights
shall be subject to approval by the Police, Planning and Public Works
Departments.
(h)
Levees and Seawalls
1)
The existing levee shall be reconstructed to conform to current City -and
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers standards, as approved in the "Wetlands Mitigation
Plan."
2)
The improvement plans shall show all proposed and existing waterfront
improvements.
(i)
Areements and Securities
1?
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall formally
agree not to protest the formation of an assessment district to construct
Kerner Boulevard and Pelican Way and to implement the approved "Wetlands
Mitigation Plan." This agreement shall be prepared by the applicant's counsel
in a form agreeable to the City Attorney.
2)
Construction of proposed public improvements may be deferred for one (1)
year from project approvals dates pending the formation of the proposed
assessment district.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(j)
Master Plan approval shall be granted for the mitigated site plan dated Septem-
ber
16, 1983. This master plan includes 11 buildings with 104,730 sq. ft.
of
office use and 140,192 sq. ft. of light industrial use (to include 104,192
sq.
ft. of general light industrial and 36,000 sq. ft. of research and develop-
ment
use).
(k)
Geoloq_y/Soils
1) Si a filling shall be to elevation +10 MSL for ultimate grades of +6.5 to
+8 MSL after 30 years of settlement.
2) Prior to placement of final fill on the site, the loose surficial fills
currently existing on the site should be scarified, conditioned and com-
pacted.
3) Imported fill should be free of organic material, and contain less than
5" rock or cobbles.
4) The seasonal marshland, southwest end of the site, permitted to be filled
under the policies of the East San Rafael Wetlands Mitigation Plan, shall
be drA-;ned and pumped dry prior to filling.
51 See Public Works Department condition (b) 1-5 for grading and earthwork
requirements.
(1) Air Quality
1) A gas ventilation system shall be indicated on the final building and
grading plans. This system shall be installed beneath the foundation of
the structures. The system shall be placed over the old fill material
with discharge pipes directed away from all pedestrian and employment
activities. The plans must be approved by the State Department of
Health Services.
2) Disturbance of any debris fill material as a result of grading, paving,
or building construction shall require proper capping or covering of the
area with clean fill material, or removal of contaminated material with
disposal at an approved site to the satisfaction of the State Department
of Health Services.
(m) Water Quality Hydrology
1) The proposed development shall meet finished flood elevations and other
requirements of Title 18 of the San Rafael Municipal Code to insure against
flooding.
2) A comprehensive erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted prior
to issuance of any grading or building permits. Although all graded
slopes have been approved through grading permits to slope away from'
pond areas that are to be preserved, specific measures such as silt
fences and straw bales may be necessary to provide additional protection
for the ponds.
3) Five monitoring wells installed for the purpose of measuring water levels
within the fill shall be required along the perimeter of the ponds. The
water within the wells shall be tested twice a year starting from
January 1, 1984, to insure that no toxic ground water from the fill
migrates or leaches into the pond areas. The test results shall be
prepared by a reputable laboratory and submitted to the City of San
Rafael and the Regional Water Quality Control Board for review. If
leaching occurs, additional mitigation measures shall be required of the
developer with bonding to insure implementation.
4) The closed drainage system servicing the surface runoff shall be designed
-with impermeable pipe material and tight joints as requi red under Public
Works Department conditions (c)1-5. The final details regarding the
drainage system shall be approved by the Regional Water Quality Control
Board and the City prior to issuance of a building permit.
(n) Plant/Animal Life - Wetlands Mitiqation Plan
The project shall comply with all of the requirements and mitigation measures
established in the East San Rafael Wetlands Mitigation Plan, approved U. S.
Army Corps and BCDC permits. These requirements include but are not limited
to the following:
1) Dedication in fee or establishment of easements over the pond areas and
the tidelands east of the levee that are to be preserved as well as
restoration to tidal action and enhancement. Enhancement shall mean
grading and landscaping of all transitional slopes around the pond area
in compliance with the Wetlands Mitigation Plan. A four foot high
vinyl clad cyclone fence shall be installed within the inner boundary of
the five foot wide landscape buffer/upland habitat to discourage
encroachment into pond areas. Climbing vines shall be planted at the
base to encourage fence screening.
2) Dedication and improvement of the 100 foot wide shoreline band and levee
with improvement of public access and parking from Pelican Way to the
shoreline to the satisfaction of Bay Conservation and Development Com-
mission. A public access easement shall be granted from MMWD and the
developer for shoreline band access from Pelican Way.
3) The applicant shall not protest the formation of an assessment district
to implement the East San Rafael 'Wetlands Mitigation Plan. If the
assessment district is not formed to implement the plan, the applicants
shall be responsible for their fair share of implementation.
(o) Traffic/ Circulation
1) The applicant shall not protest the formation of an assessment district
for improvement of Kerner Boulevard and Pelican Way. The applicant may be
responsible for full improvemient of Pelican Way if MMWD chooses not to
participate in the assessrent district. A payback provision for
improvement of MM10's one-half of the street right-of-way shall be required..
2) Public parking signs shall be posted on the parking lot northeast of
building "K". The signs shall stipulate that the public may use the
parking lot on weekends or after hours for access to the shoreline band.
3) Public access to the shoreline band from the end of Pelican Way shall
be approved by the Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC)
prior to design review approval of the first building. The access
design shall include an inviting entrance from the end of Pelican Way
with an access width to the satisfaction of BCDC and the Planning
Director. The actual paved path shall be eight feet wide and asphalt
concrete material. Landscaping along the path shall screen the parking
lot yet not obstruct views to the bay. Additionally, a chain link fence
shall be installed north o= the access path between the access entrance
at the Pelican lday cul-de-sac and the connection to the Shoreline band to,
secure the ?Marin 'iunicipal ,Fater District storage yard and protect the
pond north of the access path.
4) Parking along the peninsulas northeast of building "K" and southeast of
building "J" shall be reserved for erployee parking for the office buildings.
Heavy landscaping to include tr-ees of 24" and 36" box size shall be planted
around the parking lots to prcvide screening of parked vehicles.
5) The applicant shall pay an amount not to exceed $350,000 (1983) as the
project's fair share of traffic mitigation fees for development in East
San Rafael.
6) The project is phased and located in a traffic sensitive area, and the
City Council will take all reasonable steps and use all reasonable resources
to see that the project will not result, at the time of occupancy, in
Service Level below D at the critical Bellam Boulevard intersections.
7) The project shall -be phased in the following order:
Phase I, lt. industrial/research and development - first 18 to 24 months.
Phase II, office - second 18 to 24 months.
Phase III, lt. industrial - third 18 to 24 months.
An adjustment in the project phasing may be proposed by the applicant and
approved by the Planning Cor;-.,ission provided that any change in phasing
does not intensify traffic approved under that phase.
8) Prior to issuance of building permits for office buildings I, J, and K,
the developer shall submit a Transportation Systems Management program
prepared by a qualified consultant. Such a program may include staggered
work hours, carpools/vanpools and employee incentives for participation.
Such employee incentives may include cash, preferential parking, etc. A
reduction in the amount of required parking may be considered if additional
setbacks are provided around the yearround ponds. If the buildings are occu-
pied by multiple tenants, a TSM program may be required of the property manage-
ment. The building leases could require that individual tenants participate
in a TSM program.
(p) Project Design
1) All parking lot lighting shall be designed to shine downward, away from
the highway and street traffic as well as away from the pond areas, yet
provide for the maximum security necessary to the satisfaction of the
Police and Fire Departments.
2) Each building shall be subject to environmental design review, prior to
issuance of building permits. Each building shall carry a common
architectural theme with use of similar colors and building materials.
Each building may be subject to minor design alterations approved by the
Design Review Board and staff.
3) No steel overhead doors for the light industrial buildings shall face
Francisco Boulevard or Kerner Boulevard. All overhead doors shall be
painted the same color as the building siding.
4) The stucco stone material proposed for decorative posts shall be
replaced with masonry, wood or stucco, to match other building materials.
5) Boxing of all rooftop mechanical equipment shall be required in addition
to the roof parapet. The boxing shall be constructed of the same material
used for building siding. Details of equipment storage boxing shall be
submitted with the design review application for each building.
6) All trash enclosures shall have a common design. Each enclosure shall
be constructed of masonry material, with stucco, wood trim and trellis
top to match the building elevations. Trash enclosures shall be located
away from driveway entranceways, the pond areas and other visually
prominent areas. Details of each trash enclosure shall be submitted with
the design review application for each building.
7) Building elevations for buildings I, J, & K shall be redesigned to the
satisfaction of the Design Review Board and staff. Larger roof overhangs
and a different roof hip pitch should be considered in the redesign.
8) The three 3 -story office buildings as proposed shall be permitted provided
that the elevations comply with previous condition 6), the plaza area of
building K is better oriented toward the central plaza area, and the
third story is setback or otherwise designed to reduce building bulk.
9) A comprehensive landscape plan for the project shall accompany the first
design review application. Turf or lawn area shall be provided along
landscape islands fronting the public streets. These areas shall be
mounded to a height not to exceed three feet to provide sight distance at
driveways and intersections. Box trees of 24" and 36" size shall be
utilized in these islands. The landscape plan shall include improvements
for the shoreline band and public access connection from Pelican Way.
The landscaping irrigation, public access and directional signage, paving,
and furniture for the shoreline band and public access shall be equivalent
to that approved for Spinnaker Point 4 and 5.
10) Decorative stamped concrete or bomanite type paving shall be required at
all entrance driveways and the parking lot areas connecting the office
buildings with the central plaza area.
11) A sign program for the entire project shall be submitted with the first
design review application for a building. Like the building elevations
and trash enclosures, the sign program shall have a common design theme
throughout the project.
(q) The final master plan shall be reviewed by the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito Atatement
District for any recommended mitigation measures regarding mosquito abatement.
This shall be completed prior to the design review application of the first
building.
(r) Specific Police and Fire Department development standards shall be imposed at
the time of each individual design review.
(s) This zone change and conceptual design review approval is valid for 18 months
from the effective date of the City Council approved zone change.
EXHIBIT "B"
Situated in the State of California, County of Marin, City of San Rafael and
described as follows:
BEGINNING at the most Westerly corner of the property described
as "Parcel Two" in the Deed from :sarin Canalways and Development
Company, a corporation to Marin Development Company, a limited
partnership, recorded March 26, 1956 in Volume 1016 of Official
Records, at page 24, Marin County Records, being the intersection
of the two courses "'North 38° 32' 42" West 360.71 feet arid -North
51' 27' 18" East 210.0 feet" in said Deed; running thence on meridian
of said "Parcel Two", North 38° 32' 42,, West 266.67 feet; thence
North 51° 27' 18" East 1865 feet; thence Southeasterly in a direct
line for a distance of 906 feet, more or less, to a point on the
Easterly line of Tide Land Lot 9 in Section 12, T 1 N, R 6.W,
M.D.M., distant North 10 17' 18" East 2007.28 feet (measured along
the Easterly lines o= Tide Land Lots 25.24 and 9 in said Section
12) from the Northeast corner of the property described in the
Deed from Marin Canalways and Development Company to the State bf
California, recorded September 25, 1957 in Volume 1143, Official
Records, at page 185, Marin County Records; thence Southerly along
the Easterly lines of said Tide Land Lots 9 and 24 for a distance
of 506.28 feet, more or less, to the Northeast corner of the property
described in "Parcel One" in the Deed from Marin Canalways
and Development Company, a corporation to Equitable Development
Company recorded in Volume 1160, Official Records; at page 382,
Marin County Records; thence along the Northerly lines of said
"Parcel One", North 88° 42' 42" test 660.0 feet to the Easterly line
of Tide Land Lot 17 in Section 11; thence along said Easterly
line North 10 17' 18" East 138.0 feet; thence leaving said last
mentioned line, North 51" 14' [vest 288.0 feet, more or less, to the
most Northerly corner of said "Parcel One"; thence along the
Northwesterly line of said parcel, South 380 46' West 1048.0 feet,
more or less, to the true point of beginning of said "Parcel
One", being a point on the Northeasterly line of "Parcel Two" in
the Deed recorded in Volume 1016, Official Records,, at page 24,
Marin County Records, hereinabove referred to; thence Northwesterly
along the Northeasterly line of said "Parcel Two", for a distance
of 460.0 feet, more or less, to the most Northerly corner thereof;
thence along the Northwesterly line of said parcel, South 51° 27'
18" West 210.Ofeet to the point of beginning.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion thereof lying within the
boundaries of California State Highway.
AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion conveyed to the Nature
Conservancy, a non-profit District of Columbia corporation by
deed recorded December 30, 1969, Book 2347, Official Records, page
512, !Marin County Records.