Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Minutes 1986-01-20SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 1 In Conference Room 201 of the City of San Rafael, Monday, January 20, 1986 at 7:00 PM. Regular Meeting: CLOSED SESSION 1. CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS LITIGATION - File 1.4.1.a No. 86-3(a) - (#2). No. 86-(b) - (#2). No action taken. In the Council Chambers of the City of San Rafael, Monday, Janaury 20, 1986 at 8:00 PM. Regular Meeting: Present: Lawrence E. Mulryan, Mayor Dorothy L. Breiner, Councilmember Gary R. Frugoli, Councilmember Richard Nave, Councilmember Jerry Russom, Councimember Absent: None Also Present: Pamela J. Nicolai, City Manager; Jeanne M. Leoncini, City Clerk; Gary T. Ragghianti, City Attorney CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Breiner moved and Councilmember Frugoli seconded, to approve the recommended action on the following consent calendar items: Item 2. Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of January 3, 1986, Regular Meeting of January 6, 1986 and Special Meeting (Closed Session) of January 13, 1986 (CC) Recommended Action Approved as submitted. 3. Report on Bid Opening and Award RESOLUTION NO. 7274 - AUTHORIZING of Bid - 1500 GPM Fire Truck (FD) - THE PURCHASE OF A FIRE ENGINE File 4-2-204.A x 9-3-31 UTILIZING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUNDS (Award of bid to Seagrave Fire Apparatus, Inc., Low Bidder, for $135,695). 4. Resolution Approving Amendment to Agreement of Marin Street Light Acquisition Joint Powers Authority (PW) - File 4-4-6 x 11-4 5. Resolution of Denial Without Prejudice of Retail Sales at 30 Castro Avenue (Pl) - File 10-5 6. Resolution Authorizing Police to Review and Set Rotation Tow Service Fees Based on Annual Review of Fees Allowed by Local California Highway Patrol and Other Law Enforcement Jurisdic- tions (PD) - File 9-10-2 x 9-3-30 RESOLUTION NO. 7275 - AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF AN AMENDED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING MARIN STREET LIGHT ACQUISITION JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY. (Adding to Paragraph 1, Section 4.) RESOLUTION NO. 7276 - DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF A USE PERMIT FOR RETAIL SALES AT 30 CASTRO AVENUE RESOLUTION NO. 7277 - AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO SET ROTATION TOWING SERVICE FEES PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 6083 SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 1 SRCC MINUTES (Regularl 1/20/86 Page 2 7. Claim for Damages - Approved Insurance Consulting Associates, Inc. recommendation for a. Suzanne Riess (PW) - denial of claim. File 3-1-1046 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom & Mayor Mulryan. NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: Russom (from Minutes of Special Meeting of January 3, 1986, due to absence from meeting). B. PUBLIC HEARING - INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL PROHIBITING ANY USE THAT MAY BE IN CONFLICT WITH A CONTEMPLATED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ATTENDANT ZONING PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 (Pl) - File 10-6 x 115 Mayor Mulryan declared the public hearing opened and informed those present that the hearing was to discuss the Interim Urgency Ordinance prohibiting any use in conflict with a contemplated General Plan Amendment, and would require a four-fifths vote. If passed, the Ordinance would be valid for 45 days, and could be subject to two extensions for a maximum that would last 22 months and 15 days which is in addition to the 45 days. Mayor Mulryan also stated that if the Ordinance was passed tonight as submitted or modified as a result of the discussion held this evening, that, if new information comes in later, Council is not precluded from amending the Ordinance. Planning Director Moore was then called upon to present the staff report. Ms. Moore stated that on January 6, 1986, Council imposed an immediate pause in the approval of development projects in San Rafael and directed staff to prepare an Interim Urgency Ordinance for consideration.at a public hearing tonight. The Ordinance generally prohibits any uses that may be in conflict with contemplated amendments to the San Rafael General Plan expecting to result from the ongoing revision of the General Plan. The Ordinance includes findings, that current and immediate threats exist to the public health, safety and welfare, unless building and development within the City are temporarily restricted during the necessary studies and ongoing revision of the San Rafael General Plan. The Ordinance allows no applications for subdivisions, annexations, prezonings or rezonings, land use permits, building permits, or environmental documents to be accepted, processed, approved or granted except for projects which have already secured building permits, and a few other exemptions. The Ordinance would not allow new applications for land use or development projects to be accepted unless they fit an exempt category specified in the Ordinance. Ms. Moore stated that she would be relying on a committee consisting of the City Manager, City Attorney, and one or two members of the City Council when interpreting the Ordinance. Any decision of the Planning Director could then be appealed to the Planning Commission, and, as is consistent with existing Municipal Code provisions, Planning Commission determinations may be appealed to the City Council. Planning Director Moore then responded to 44 letters received from people concerned that their projects would be affected by the Interim Urgency Ordinance, as well as four additional letters requesting exemptions, that were submitted at the meeting; One from Marin Financial Corporation re property located at 1200 Lincoln Avenue; One from William T. Bullard, Jr., Attorney, representing Spinnaker Point Phase V project; One from Mark B. Scott re Crest Marin Condominium Conversion Application; and an additional letter from Forrest R. Morphew, representing The Oil Warehouse Company concerning the Building Moratorium. Mayor Mulryan called upon the people who wanted to address the proposed Ordinance. SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 2 SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 3 Albert Bianchi, Attorney, representing the Civic Center North project, stated that the contention of the Civic Center project would be to serve the public welfare, and that the City and County have recognized a need for a hotel and convention center in order to support the Marin Civic Center. Mr. Peter Goodman, re 36 Woodland Avenue project, needed clarification regarding his project being affected by the Ordinance. Ms. Moore responded that, if Mr. Goodman could demonstrate that there would be no increase in P.M. peak trips, his project could be exempted. Mr. Jack Farrar, representing Dexter Toyoto, stated that his client presently has a small building at the Dexter Toyoto complex and has an application on file and asked that the complex be exempt because it would not create a traffic increase. Mayor Mulryan suggested that Mr. Farrar write a letter to the Planning Department on this matter with a request for an opinion; Planning Director Moore informed Council that staff was familiar with the Dexter Toyota application, and stated that this project probably can demonstrate that an increase in trips would not happen. Mr. John Belz, Architect, urged Council to approve the 34 unit Laurel Glen Condominium project. George Silvestri, Jr., Attorney, representing Ross General Hospital and the Marin Sports and Medical Fitness Center, voiced concern about both projects and asked that they be exempt because these projects are health related facilities. Concerning the lap pool in the Marin Sports and Medical Fitness Center project, Mayor Mulryan noted that all Mr. Silvestri had to demonstrate was that there would not be an increase during peak hour traffic. In reference to the hospital, Mayor Mulryan indicated that Mr. Silvestri would have to come before the committee for review of the EIR process. Mr. Silvestri stated that it would be appropriate and in the interest of the community if an exemption would be identified. He was concerned that there are exemptions that might involve matters that are more trivial or controversial than the hospital. He .stated that staff time has already been paid for and that $46,000 has been tendered to the City; also that the building permit would be administered through the State, and if the concern is because of the potential risk of challenge, they would take that risk. Mr. David Sargent, representing Civic Center Plaza development, stated that he hand delivered a letter outlining an appeal for an exemption to the Planning Department, and that he did not see it listed as one of the 44 letters mentioned earlier. Ms. Moore stated that she had not seen the letter, but would check to see if it had been received and it would then be reviewed and a response would be made. Rick Norman, Attorney representing Mr. Fred Grange brought up two points; 1) Wanted to know the status re interpretations where permits were existing but about to expire and, that a timely extension application had been made but not acted upon, having to do with the Heliport Project. 2) Asked for an interpretation of Division 3, Item (0) of the word "transient", if a travel center fit under that category, and would the Heliport in effect be a transient center. Ms. Moore responded to Mr. Norman's questions. 1) Time extension - There would not be expirations for anything that expired during the time the Ordinance was in effect or for any project that had a timely application extension, such as the project described by Mr. Norman. 2) The travel center - Staff does not interpret Mr. Grange's travel center as being a "transient" project exempt under the provisions of the Ordinance. Regarding the limited use of the Heliport, Ms. Moore stated that she would need to review the file. Mr. Nils Rosenquest, Vice President of Jan Ekels Company, Inc. with a small project at 27 Valencia, stated that his project has no effect on the General Plan and Ms. Moore interejected that his project is exempt. SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 3 SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 4 Jay Paxton, Attorney, referred to Divison 4 of the Ordinance, first page, last sentence on the bottom, stating he understood that the sentence indicated that, where a project is exempt, an application for that project would be accepted during the pendency of the moratorium. Mr. Paxton continued to state that if this was correct, the last sentence of Division 4 appearing on page 6 should include a similar wording that an application would be accepted in the event that a project was exempt under the provision of the Ordinance. Ms. Moore stated that this was the intent of the Ordinance and would be specified. Mr. John Wallace, Carpenter's Union Local 35 Business Representative, indicated that the Ordinance would have a devastating effect to the carpentry workers in monetary losses. Michael Broughton of San Rafael was concerned that the Ordinance would affect his application for an extension on his project. Ms. Moore replied that she was not familiar with his application but would discuss it with Mr. Broughton after the meeting. Matthew C. Guthrie, Architect representing Grand Landing Design Review, requested having Sub -section 8 expanded to include an exemption for commercial condominium maps. Mr. Matt Borsick with San Marin Lumber asked if there would be a possibility of exemptions to the Ordinance being increased or have other cases heard at the end of the 45 day pause. Mayor Mulryan replied that throughout this period there will be an oportunity where reasons for change may be brought to the Committee's attention. City Attorney Ragghianti interjected stating that Council may amend, modify, or delete provisions of this Ordinance upon the affirmative vote of four Councilmembers with the finding that any such modification shall serve to implement the goals, policies and purposes of this Ordinance. Mr. Richard Foster re 1476 Lincoln Avenue Tanner -Foster apartment project, urged Council to adopt Division 3(v) as part of the Ordinance. Mr. Harry Winters, President of the West End Neighborhood Association urged having the General Plan discussed with the various neighborhoods for broad input. Ms. Moore stated that there would be a series of community workshops on issues and goal -setting early in the process; interim hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council on various sections of the General Plan prior to a final round of public hearings for the Commission and Council on a draft document. Also, a random survey will be conducted of residences and businesses in San Rafael. Mr. Richard Gosse, President of the San Rafael Citizens for Better Government, urged Council to adopt his proposed Ordinance for a two year moratorium instead. Mr. Paul Cohen, President of Carpenter's Local 35 in San Rafael, stated that he recognized the need for the updated plan for San Rafael but given the discussions on the moratoriums in all of Marin County, they expect to have an increase of members working in San Francisco which would be putting a possible 2000 additional vehicles on Highway 101 during peak commute hours. Mr. Gregory Call, General Contractor, was concerned that the Ordinance would affect home improvements. Ms. Moore stated that home improvements can be done, with the exception that dwelling units cannot be added. Mr. Dick Blood-Bornholdt, Consultant to the County of Marin, indicated that there is a significant need for affordable housing in San Rafael and other cities and urged that consideration be given to these projects. Mark B. Scott, Attorney, representing Crest Marin Condominium Conversion, spoke on affordable housing and asked for an exemption or provision for condominimum conversion applications. SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 4 SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 5 Richard Tarrant, Attorney, representing Spinnaker on the Bay wanted the record to reflect that his client objected to the adoption of the Ordinance especially if adopted without exemption for their project. Mr. Ken Sites, businessman in San Rafael was uncertain as to what the Ordinance covered. Mayor Mulryan then explained the purpose of the Ordinance. Ms. Nancy Mosk, member of the Board of Directors for Canal Community Alliance, urged that consideration be given to exempting affordable dwelling units and spoke on neighborhood serving commercial development aimed at resident consumers, and also asked if levee repair and flood control projects were included in the exemptions. Mayor Mulryan indicated that levee repair and flood control are included in the exemption under "0". Ms. Bonnie Marks, President of Canal Community Alliance commented that the inadequacies of the General Plan cannot continue to exist, and urged Council to have revisions of the East San Rafael Neighborhood Plan done concurrently with revisions of the General Plan. Ms. Moore stated that the East San Rafael Neighborhood Plan would be proceeding parallel to the General Plan update, and that the draft for the East San Rafael Neighborhood Plan would be available for continued workshops in advance. There being no further comments, Mayor Mulryan closed the public hearing. Councilmember Russom moved and Councilmember Nave seconded, that the following amendments be incorporated within the Ordinance: Division 3(v) - Permits needed to construct rental residential units on an in -fill site so long as no rezoning is needed and complete applications were filed prior to January 7, 1986; Division 3(w) - Permits that authorize minor changes to already approved or otherwise exempt projects; Division 3(x) - Permits associated with development consistent with a specific Memorandum of Understanding between the City and another public agency, which memorandum was executed prior to January 7, 1986. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom & Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None Councilmember Breiner moved and Councilmember Frugoli seconded, to incorporate into Division 4, page 6, 9th line - "Except for projects exempted under DIVISION 3," Also, add as part of Division 7 - "Council may amend, modify, or delete provisions of this Ordinance upon the affirmative vote of four Councilmembers with the finding that any such modification shall serve to implement the goals, policies and purposes of this Ordinance." AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom & Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None Councilmember Breiner pointed out having a correction made on Page 5, (1), 7th line, (h) should be (g), as noted by Attorney Albert Bianchi. RESOLUTION NO. 7278 - RESOLUTION CERTIFYING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL PROHIBITING ANY USE THAT MAY BE IN CONFLICT WITH A CONTEMPLATED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ATTENDANT ZONING PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom & Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 5 SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 6 The title of the Ordinance was read: "AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL PROHIBITING ANY USES THAT MAY BE IN CONFLICT WITH A CONTEMPLATED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ATTENDANT ZONING PROPOSALS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858" Councilmember Russom moved and Councilmember Nave seconded, to dispense with the reading of the Ordinance in its entirety and refer to it by title only and adopt Charter Ordinance No. 1524 (Interim Urgency Ordinance) by the following vote, to wit: (4/5ths vote required). AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom & Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None 9. PUBLIC HEARING - MASTER COMMUNITY ANTENNA TELEVISION (CATV) FRANCHISE AGREEMENT AND ENABLING ORDINANCE (CM) - File 9-7-4 Mayor Mulryan declared the public hearing opened. Administrative Assistant Harry stated that the Master Cable Televi'sion Agreement and Resolution was a culmination of four years of negotiations with the MCC/MCCATV Sub -committee of which Councilmember Breiner is the Chair, the City/Town County Negotiation Committee as well as Viacom Cablevision. Mr. Harry brought attention to changes on the Master Franchise Agreement, page 7, Section 10. 3rd line after word "channel" add, "free of charge,"; 5th line same page, after word "designate" add, "provide free of charge and maintain". Mayor Mulryan called upon anyone having objections to the proposed agreement. Ms. Cassandra Cosby, Chairperson on the Board of Directors for Marin Community Video, had concerns about inclusions to the agreement that were not made through the County. Ms. Cosby requested that the following points be considered when the Oversight Committee is established. "To establish reasonable guidelines and rules for the use of the community programming channel including determining a set of priorities to insure that Marin County residents, public organizations and education and governmental institutions have access to the facilities and the channel during prime hours. Providing and operating a second access channel. Providing regular training. Determining the acceptable level of state of the art equipment necessary and the availability of technological advance as appropriate to public access and insuring continuing availability of the equipment for access programming". Ms. Sally Allemang, Community Producer at Channel 31, stated that she would like to have free access to the editing facilities and technical equipment as they had before and also that their programs be shown on prime time. Councilmember Breiner indicated that many of the concerns mentioned by the people from Channel 31 were being taken care of and that the Oversight Committee would be paying attention to their concerns. Ms. Valerie Castellana of Viacom gave an overview on community access provisions that will be expanded in Marin County. Ms. Castellana indicated that there is a lot of fear that the community will not have access privileges but that she was disputing this, and that they have worked long and hard with the community on the original agreement. Mr. Bill Mallouk, Community Producer for Channel 31, spoke on the needs of doing a community production and editing facilities and character generator, and wanted assurance that Channel 31 would have access to use these facilities. Ms. Castellana responded that it is without question, that these facilities would be available to Channel 31. SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 6 SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 7 Ms. Barbara Balitz, Acting Director of Channel 31, commented that the Minutes of the meeting of the County Board of Supervisors, stated that the Supervisors moved to approve the amendment made by Marin Community Video including the motions regarding the priorities instructions of the Oversight Committee as outlined by Channel 31. Administrative Assistant Harry stated he would check with the County concerning this. There being no further comments, Mayor Mulryan closed the public hearing. Councilmember Breiner informed Council that the County of Marin approved and adopted the agreement on January 14, 1986 and thus far, the cities of Fairfax, Larkspur, Ross, San Anselmo and Tiburon have had their first reading of the Ordinance and should approve it on second reading and final adoption. Also, minor modifications will come back to everyone concerned for review. Councilmember Frugoli inquired of Ms. Castellana when the effective date would be for the rate of $12.50 to take place, and Ms. Castellana replied that it would be March 1, 1986, assuming the additional channels have been provided. When asked how long the $12.50 rate would be in effect, Ms. Castellana replied that the rates have been deregulated. Mr. Harry interjected that as of December 29, 1986, through the Federal Communication Policy Act, Viacom has the authority to increase the rates without any regulation (by a maximum of 5 percent annually). RESOLUTION NO. 7279 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF AN AGREEMENT WITH TELE-VUE SYSTEMS, INC. (Viacom Cablevision) (Marin Master Agreement/Community Antenna Television Agreement) (subject to the approval by the Cities, Towns and County of Marin) AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom & Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None The title of the Ordinance was read: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL REPEALING ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SAN RAFAEL MUNICIPAL CODE INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF AN EXISTING COMMUNITY ANTENNA TELEVISION AGREEMENT" Councilmember Breiner moved and Councilmember Frugoli seconded, to dispense with the reading of the Ordinance in its entirety and refer to it by title only and pass Charter Ordinance No. 1525 to print, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom & Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None 10. PUBLIC HEARING - P85-15; DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR SHORELINE INDUSTRIAL PARK; 1615 FRANCISCO BOULEVARD; CAL-PDX, INC., OWNER; MARTIN BRAMANTE/LEE JORDAN, REPS.; AP 9-320-02 THRU 13; 15 THRU 26; AND 32 THRU 39 (Pl) - File 6-38 x 10-6 Mayor Mulryan declared the public hearing opened and stated that the Public Hearing would be continued to March 17, 1986, as requested by the Owner, Cal -Pox, Inc. 11. PUBLIC HEARING - SR85-7; APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S CONDITIONAL APPROVAL FOR MARIN SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER SIGN PROGRAM REVISIONS: 25 BELLAM BOULEVARD; BLUMENFELD ENTERPRISES, OWNER; JOSEPH BEHM, JR., REP.; DR. DINU GRAY, APPELLANT; AP 18-051-20 (Pl) - FILE 10-11 Mayor Mulryan declared the public hearing opened and stated that the Public Hearing would be continued to February 3, 1986, as requested by the Planning Department. SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 7 SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 8 12. ADOPTION OF 1986/87 to 1991/92 5 -YEAR STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (STIP) LIST (PW) - FILE 171 x 9-3-40 Public Works Director Bernardi stated that the 1986/87 funding is very bleak for any 101 projects. The Hollings -Gramm-Rudman Amendment could reduce the money available even further, but there has been no change in the Marin County Urban System Committee's position because they support mainline projects to the exclusion of the I-580 Interchange. On the Proposed Projects list of 19 items, the I-580/Bellam Boulevard and I-580/Irene Street projects are listed as numbers 10 and 11. Councilmember Frugoli inquired if priority was considered if a match was made from local jurisdications, and Mr. Bernardi stated it is but it would need to be on the Approved Project list before it is considered to be of a priority nature. RESOLUTION NO. 7280 - RESOLUTION OF SAN RAFAEL APPROVING THE 1986/87 TO 1991/92 MAJOR PROJECTS IN MARIN COUNTY AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MARIN COUNTY URBAN SYSTEM COMMITTEE AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom & Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: none 13. REPORT ON INCLUSION OF MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN APPLICATIONS FOR USE OF CITY FACILITIES AND WHEN PARTICIPATING IN CITY PROGRAMS (CA) - File 9-6-1 Councilmember Breiner requested that City .Attorney Ragghianti have some guidelines established re parents signing a waiver absolving the City of responsiblity relating to the City's risk management. Mr. Ragghianti replied that his staff would be addressing this matter. Councilmember Russom inquired if a waiver or release is required from parents in the Childcare area, and Recreation Director McNamee replied that a review has recently been done on waiver forms resulting in some being rewritten. In the Childcare program, parents sign waivers and provide staff with an extensive medical background, and that the waiver does absolve the City from any responsibility. Councilmember Breiner asked if there would be an advantage if parents are required to show proof that they have medical coverage, and Mr. Ragghianti replied that his staff would look into this matter also. Ms. McNamee stated that staff is in the process of investigating a special liability policy for Childcare only, and any professional associations that may have a policy nation-wide. Also, that accident insurance is available for people enrolling a child in the Childcare program, and that probably by next summer this will be required with an increase in cost of approximately $3 or $5 for accident coverage. There being no further business, meeting was adjourned. A . JE M. LEONCINI\ City C erk APPROVED ON THIS DAY OF 1986 MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 1/20/86 Page 8