Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Minutes 1984-09-04SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 9/4/84 Page 1 In Conference Room 201 of the City of San Rafael, Tuesday, September 4, 1984, at 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting: CLOSED SESSION 1. CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS LITIGATION Council met in closed session to discuss litigation. Council then reconvened in public and unanimously authorized settlement of claim No. 3-1-915 in the name of Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co., in amount of $2,092.03. In the Council Chambers of the City of San Rafael, Tuesday, September 4, 1984, at 8:00 P.M. Regular Meeting: Present: Lawrence E. Mulryan, Mayor Dorothy L. Breiner, Councilmember Gary R. Frugoli, Councilmember Richard Nave, Councilmember Jerry Russom, Councilmember Absent: None Also Present: Robert F. Beyer, City Manager; Jeanne M. Leoncini, City Clerk; Peter J. Muzio, City Attorney ORAL COMMUNICATIONS OF AN URGENCY NATURE: DISCUSSION RE USE OF -SKATEBOARD RAMP - FILE - 10-5 George Stratton of 774 Las Colindas Rd. said that when the decision to abate the skateboard ramp was made, he was out of town. Upon his return, he found that the boys using the ramp were now attempting to disguise the noise by turning on some kind of small engine or power mower which did not work. Neighbors have called police on the noise problem. His concern is, when is the ramp coming down and, what can or will the City do if the ramp does not come down? Councilmember Russom indicated that Council should proceed legally on this problem. City Manager Beyer stated this issue could be brought back at the next meeting, but there is no solution at this time. Mayor Mulryan stated that the ramp construction is in direct violation of a City Ordinance. This matter will be brought to the attention of the Police Department and steps taken to bring a halt to the use of the ramp. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Frugoli moved and Councilmember Nave seconded, to approve the recommended Action on the following Consent Calendar items: Item 2. Approval of Minutes of Special Joint Meeting of August 20, 1984 (CC) 3. Bid Opening and Award of Contract - Oakwood Drive Slide Repair Project (PW) - File 4-1-370 Recommended Action Approved as submitted. RESOLUTION NO. 6912 - RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT - OAKWOOD DRIVE SLIDE REPAIR PROJECT NO. 19-19908000850 (to Piombo General Engineering Contractors; low bidder, in amount of $24,376.40). SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 9/4/84 Page 1 SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 9/4/84 Page 2 5. Request for Approval of Cooperation Agreement Concerning the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program (CM) - File 147 6. Request for Leave to Present Late Claim - Marc Leaderman - (PW) - File 3-1-916 7. Claim for Damages - Elizabeth Maloney (PW) - File 3-1-917 8. Extension of Agreement with Marin Pet Accommodation Services (CM) - File 4-3-107 RESOLUTION NO. 6913 - Authorizing Signing of Agreement with the County of Marin Community Devel- opment Block Grant Cooperation Agreement (3 -year agreement from 9/30/84 to 9/30/87) . Approved Insurance Consulting Associates, recommendation for denial of request. Approved George Hills Co.,Inc. recommendation for denial of claim. RESOLUTION NO. 6914 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF A CONTRACT, LEASE OR AGREEMENT - (Marin Pet Accommodation Services for removal of dead wildlife - from 9/1/84 thru 8/31/86 with 30 day termination clause). 9. Resolutions (2) Setting the RESOLUTION NO. 6915 - RESOLUTION 1984/85 Tax Rate (Fin) - FIXING THE RATE OF TAXES FOR File 9-12-1 FISCAL YEAR 1984/85 - Tax Rate for City of San Rafael - ( For payment of principal and in terest on general obligation and interest on general obligation Sewer Bonds, on Open Space Bonds, and for payment of principal and interest on Terra Linda Rec- reation District Bonds assumed by City of San Rafael - January 1, 1973 the sum of ... $.014) RESOLUTION NO. 6916 - RESOLUTION FIXING THE RATE OF TAXES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1984/85 - The Terra Linda Annexation - (For payment of principal and in- terest on general obligation Open Space Bonds and Terra Linda Recreation District bonds assumed by City of San Rafael ...$.009) AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom & Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner (From Item #2 only due to absence from meeting). 4. APPROVAL OF WATER DISTRICT AGREEMENTS - PEACOCK GAP IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PW) -FILE - 6-37x151 Mayor Mulryan asked to remove this item from the Consent Calendar for discussion regarding the inflexibility of the agreementsset forth by the MMWD. Public Works Director, David Bernardi explained that the MMWD's agreements are standard agreements and would be difficult to change. SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 9/4/84 Page 2 10. SRCC MEETING (Regular) 9/4/84 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 6917 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF PIPELINE EXTENSION AGREEMENT NO.1 (WATER MAIN FACILITIES AND APPURTENANCES) WITH MARIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT - PEACOCK GAP IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, PEACOCK GAP UNIT 2A, SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom & Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None RESOLUTION NO. 6918 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF PIPELINE EXTENSION AGREEMENT NO. 2 (WATER MAIN FACILITIES AND APPURTENANCES) WITH MARIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT - PEACOCK GAP IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom & Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None RESOLUTION NO. 6919 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF PIPELINE EXTENSION AGREEMENT NO. 3 (WATER TANK AND APPURTENANCES) WITH MARIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT - PEACOCK GAP IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom & Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING USE PERMIT AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN FOR A SECOND FLOOR ADDITION TO THE NAUTILUS HEALTH CLUB, 734 "A" STREET (Pl) - FILE - 10-5 x 10-7 In discussion, it was agreed to amend the findings in the -Resolution Re UP83-64 from: "The second story addition as proposed would not be detrimental to the health., safety & welfare of surrounding uses and properties in that the minimum on-site parking requirements for a gymnasium use would be met and that square footage limitations would be established for each use." to. "The second story addition as proposed would not be detrimental to the health, safety & welfare of persons in the neighborhood or be detrimental to surrounding uses and properties or to the general welfare of the city in that the minimum on-site parking requirements for a gymnasium use would be met and that square footage limitations would be established for each use; and in that the parking demand is the result of the present lawful use of the property and not of the proposed second story addition." RESOLUTION NO. 6920 - RESOLUTION APPROVING USE PERMIT AND DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATIONS FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO THE EXISTING NAUTILUS HEALTH CLUB AT 734 "A" STREET FILE NUMBERS UP83- 64 & ED 83-78 (As amended) AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Nave, Russom and Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner and Frugoli (Due to potential conflicts of interest) SRCC MEETING (Regular) 9/4/84 Page 3 11, SRCC MINUTES (�.egular) 9/4/84 Page 4 PUBLIC HEARING - Z83-14 - REZONING FROM "U" TO PCM FOR "ANDERSEN DRIVE BUSINESS PARK"; 1111 - 1151 ANDERSEN DR.; GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE DISTRICT, OWNER; JAMES McDONALD, REP.; AP 18-142-74 & 18-180-22-(Pl)-FILE 10-3 Mayor Mulryan opened the Public Hearing. Planning Director Anne Moore reported that this project presently consists of rezoning from "U" to PCM District to build approximately 108,000 sq, ft. of office/light industrial development. In August, the Planning Commission recommended to the Council, certification of a Negative Declaration and adoption of a zone change. The property is located in East San Rafael and is subject to determination if it is prejudicial to the East San Rafael Neighborhood Plan. At the hearing of the Planning Commission, several persons, including representatives of the Canal Community Alliance and Friends of Spinnaker voiced their concerns that the project would use up almost all remaining levels of the Service E capacity and is prejudicial to the Neighborhood Plan, primarily on the traffic matter. Mayor Mulryan inquired of Ms. Moore, whether the Negative Declaration included all potential impacts associated with development, and whether it can be mitigated if we get the long term improvements on Bellam. Ms. Moore responded that in the time frame of construction and occupancy of all approved projects, the City will identify improvements needed to be done in the area to serve that development and subsequent developments and will need to find the funds to secure the improvements to be constructed. Mayor Mulryan asked whether that forces a phasing of all develop- ments from this point until the next 10 years or so and Ms. Moore indicated that any large project having a lengthy review would be at a disadvantage compared to smaller projects. The cumulative effect for smaller projects is that of a single large project. Mayor Mulryan asked if there is a difference if we waited for the EIR before making a decision. Ms. Moore answered affirmatively, and indicated in that case, the Council could decide`to approve Drojects that might result in significant adverse effects. Councilmember Frugoli asked about the status of the Canalways and Spinnaker projects. Ms. Moore indicated that the final approval of the EIR for Spinnaker is currently under review by the Planning Commission. With regard to the Canalways project, staff is in the process of responding to oral and written comments on the draft EIR, after receiving testimony at the last Council meeting. Councilmember Nave questioned the building phasing being a miti- gation measure. He felt that the project is appropriate for the property and asked for more information on how traffic will be affected. Ms. Moore stated that traffic is measured on how much will be generated at peak time and where the traffic is going to and coming from. For this kind of land use, the majority of traffic in the PM peak is outbound; the minority is inbound. The majority of the split going North and South is Northward outbound. For those trying to go to downtown San Rafael, West Marin, Northgate or points north it would be unlikely that the PM peak would go South on Andersen and use Sir Francisco Drake Blvd. to get on to 101 at Larkspur and back to San Rafael. Councilmember Nave asked about traffic diversion through Woodland Avenue, and Ms. Moore indicated that the traffic would have to go up either Lincoln or Irwin which both operate near capacity in the PM peak also. SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 9/4/84 Page 4 SRCC MINUTES ( gular) 9/4/84 Page 5 Councilmember Breiner asked Ms. Moore when the traffic report would be coming back to Council and was told that the report would be completed in November 1984. Councilmember Breiner asked what the earliest date would be for the interim improvements to be in place and Public Works Director Bernardi indicated that it is anticipated from four to six weeks are needed for finalization and approval by Cal Trans; the right-of- way acquisition might take some time, then the bid process which would take about 60 days, making it November or December. Jim McDonald, whose firm is in charge of the architectual aspects of the project, reported that the Planning Commission unanimously approved the project without any conditions other than were offered by the developer in a phasing program. He mentioned that Viacom sent a letter to the City expressing an interest in locating to this area mainly because they need a larger facility and adequate parking. Mayor Mulryan stated Council's concern is how to best accommodate the project. Mr. Jerry Syderhoud representing Bob Thomas, the Applicant, stated that when the bridge district originally subdivided the two parcels, the Planning Commission asked that the property be zoned from "U" to PCM. Councilmember Russom asked if it would be feasible to lengthen the phasing on building #2 so that the building permit would not be issued for at least 12 months after the building permit for building #1. Mr. Syderhoud responded that it is a timing matter. Development of this nature has economic constraints. A one year interval would still be in the fall of 1985 and they wouldn't be able to put up a building until the Spring of the following year. Councilmember Nave asked Councilmember Russom if he wanted one year from the time the building is built. Councilmember Russom responded negatively and indicated from the time building #1's building permit is issued the way the phasing is stated now by the Applicant calls for building #11s permit to be issued within the first year after approval. Building #2 could be issued anytime after 12 months from approval date. Ms. Kathy Campbell of the Canal Community Alliance referred to her letter submitted to Council on August 31 outlining opposition and stating that the project is prejudicial to the Neighborhood Plan. She asked if this project is allowed to use up capacity traffic, how will the Neighborhood Plan deal with other projects which might be deemed prejudicial to the Neighborhood Plan and will other projects that generate traffic have to reduce their scope to accommodate the Golden Gate Bridge District. She went on to state they disagree with the Planning staff on their recommendation to approve a Negative Declaration and to rezone this project. She indicated they do feel however, that Ms. Moore and John Blaney are providing sensible and capable leadership in developing the Neighborhood Plan that will be equitable to all when total buildout occurs. Mr. Sydney Hendricks who has Spinnaker Point development stated that the traffic situation is no worse now than it was two and one half years ago. He indicated that he and his partner have been waiting for two and one half years for an approved project and have done what the staff recommends, and are doing what the Planning Commission expects of them, yet other people who have come in four or five months ago get their projects approved. He asked Council to keep them in mind when his project comes before them. SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 9/4/84 Page 5 SRCC MINUTES (hegular) 9/4/84 Page 6 Ms. Sheila Hofmann of Friends of Spinnaker Point stated that they feel that with all the traffic generated, whether it is level of Service E or F, that a Negative Declaration is not appropriate for this situation. Mr. Jack McDonough with the Canal Community Alliance reemphasized the question is not how fine the architecture is or attractive the landscaping is, or how substantial the potential tenants might be, but the big picture that this proposal presents a clear and dramatic planning issue. Ms. Nancy Mosk, resident on Canal Street and on the Board of Directors for Canal Community Alliance said that development in East San Rafael is out of control. Between the time of the draft EIR for Spinnaker on the Bay was written in April this year, and the final EIR in August 87,896 sq. ft. of development have been approved. The Andersen Drive Project of 108,000 sq. ft. will bring that to 195,896 sq. ft. Mr. Jeff Stahl stated that even with the interim improvements or the mitigation fees, the problem will not be resolved. Mr. Ted Kreines, president of Kreines and Kreines, said that in his professional opinion, this is a classic case of a project requiring an EIR, while attempting to comply with CEQA by seeking a Negative Declaration. Traffic analysis must be performed on existing situations and improvements then can be considered as mitigation measures. Mr. Kreines pointed out that the Council does not have an adequate Negative Declaration, and contended that the traffic analysis used in previous EIR's as well as the Andersen Drive project are misleading and silent on the breakdown of the Bellam Boulevard/ Francisco Boulevard East Interchange Intersection. Ms. Angela Wood of 222 Catalina Boulevard, a resident/homeowner and Realtor, spoke in opposition to the project. Ms. Maryann Pearson of Frank Howard Allen Realtors, spoke representing Viacom Cablevision in their negotiations with the developer who are to build the site for them on the Andersen Drive project. She said that the present Viacom location is not desirable to the community nor to the traffic problems. Mayor Mulryan inquired as to the amount of space Viacom is planning to use and was told by Ms. Pearson they would need 29,000 sq. ft. Valerie Castalano, general manager for Viacom Cablevision requested that a decision be made now to prevent them from leasing space elsewhere. At the request of Councilmember Breiner, Ms. Pearson indicated employees' hours are staggered from 5:30 a.m. to 11:30 p.m. Mr. Jack Cornelius of the Canal Community Alliance stated that the Neighborhood Plan is for everyone, and if Viacom is a member of the community they should attend the meetings. Mr. Robert Greene, representing the applicant stated that they would be willing to delay the second building for one full year beyond issuance of the building permit for the first building. There being no further comments, Mayor Mulryan closed the Public Hearing. After discussion, Councilmember Breiner moved to approve only building No. 1, with the developer to come back after the Neighborhood Plan has been finished and traffic study updated. Mayor Mulryan asked if Councilmember Breiner's motion addressed the approval or disapproval of buildings two and three. SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 9/4/84 Page 6 SRCC MINUTES (hegular) 9/4/84 Page 7 Councilmember Breiner answered that she would not recommend approval of those buildings, not until the Neighborhood Plan and the traffic study are completed . Motion died for lack of a second. Councilmember Russom suggested that the phasing be lenghthened to two years rather than a one year lapse for building two. This would allow a full two year phase delay from the time the building permit is issued for building number one, and would leave building number 3 the same. Councilmember Nave agreed to negotiate on the phasing for the project. Councilmember Frugoli stated if the project is delayed, the developers would have difficulties in obtaining financing. He agreedthat the Planning Commission was correct in recommending certification of a Negative Declaration. Councilmember Frugoli moved and Councilmember Nave seconded, to adopt the Resolution certifying a Negative Declaration, with provision for phasing of Building #2 to be one year from issuance of Building Permit. RESOLUTION NO. 6921 - RESOLUTION CERTIFYING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A ZONE CHANGE TO PCM DISTRICT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANDERSEN DRIVE BUSINESS PARK, A 108,000 SQUARE FEET OFFICE AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Frugoli, Nave, Russom and Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None The title of the Ordinance was read: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTED BY REFERENCE BY SECTION 14.15.020 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA, SO AS TO RECLASSIFY CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FROM "U" (UNCLASSIFIED) DISTRICT TO PCM (PLANNED COMMERCIAL AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT 1111-1151 Andersen Drive" Councilmember Frugoli moved and Councilmember Nave seconded, to dispense with the reading of the Ordinance in its entirety and refer to it by title only and pass Charter Ordinance No. 1495 to print by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Frugoli, Nave, Russom and Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None 12. PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF VARIANCE FOR OFF SITE SIGN FOR "TAO YUAN" RESTAURANT; 903 LINCOLN AVENUE; HAROLD HELLER, OWNER, STEPHEN ABBOTT,REP. & APPELLANT; AP 11-273-1 (P1) - FILE 10-4 Mayor Mulryan opened the Public Hearing and continued the matter at the request of staff, to September 17, 1984. 13. AGREEMENT WITH LARRY LODER RE ABATEMENT OF SECOND ILLEGAL UNIT AT 405 "D" STREET (P1) - FILE 3-3-30 Larry Loder took exception to the term "illegal unit". He asked that the record show he has been conforming with the agreement entered into as of December, 1982 with the City and is abiding with the Planning Department's request that the last "excess unit" be taken care of. SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 9/4/84 Page 7 SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 9/4/84 Page 8 Councilmember Frugoli moved and Councilmember Nave seconded, to accept report. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom and Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None 14. RECOMMENDATION RE CALTRANS' RESPONSE TO CITY PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP PARKING OVER CULVERT UNDER VIADUCT (RA) - FILE 171 x 4-8=14 x 4-8-15 x (SRRA) R-81 Redevelopment Program Manager Ours reported that after having met with Caltrans, the outcome is that Caltrans would convert the parking area to a park and ride facility, also restripe it, redesign it at Caltrans' expense, and that it would be available to commuters on a first-come, first-served basis. There now is an average of 54 vacant parking spaces daily. In redesigning the existing parking, they would have 48-54 additional spaces, totalling 108 new parking spaces created at no cost to the City. The parking would also be available to shoppers. The French Quarter will deal directly with Caltrans regarding lease of parking spaces for their own use. Councilmember Russom moved and Councilmember Frugoli seconded, to instruct staff to notify Caltrans to convert the lots to Park and Ride facility, terminate existing lease agreements and refund any monies due. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom and Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None Councilmember Breiner requested that continued discussions be held with the Golden Gate Bridge District to assure there is adequate parking provided for pickup and delivery of passengers to and from the Transportation Center. 15. ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED (Dedication of Parcel to City) for PUBLIC OPEN SPACE - "COLEMAN'S SPRING LOT" (P1) - FILE 2-1-73 RESOLUTION NO. 6922 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ACCEPT A GRANT DEED FOR THE DEDICATION OF "COLEMAN'S SPRING LOT" AS OPEN SPACE AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom and Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None 16. APPROVAL OF FISCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE SAN RAFAEL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, COUNTY OF MARIN, SAN RAFAEL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, SAN RAFAEL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT AND MARIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT RE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FOR THE SAN RAFAEL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CM) - FILE 4-16-7 a. Resolution Authorizing Execution of Fiscal Agreement. RESOLUTION NO. 6923 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF A CONTRACT, LEASE OR AGREEMENT FISCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN RAFAEL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, COUNTY OF MARIN, SAN RAFAEL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT, SAN RAFAEL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT AND MARIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT RE: TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FOR THE SAN RAFAEL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom and Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None b. Resolution Authorizing Execution of Assistance Agreement Between the City of San Rafael and the San Rafael Elementary District and the San Rafael High School District. SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 9/4/84 Page 8 SRCC MINUTES (._-gular) 9/4/84 Page 9, RESOLUTION NO. 6924 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF A CONTRACT, LEASE OR AGREEMENT ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN RAFAEL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE SAN RAFAEL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT RE: TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FOR THE SAN RAFAEL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom and Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None 17. LEGISLATION AFFECTING SAN RAFAEL (CM) - FILE 9-1 H. R. 4103 National Cable Television Legislation Councilmember Breiner moved and Councilmember Nave seconded, to support H.R. 4103. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom and Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None . AB 999 (Sher, Shirling, Peace) Special Elections by Mail Councilmember Breiner moved and Councilmember Russom seconded, to support AB 999. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Frugoli, Nave, Russom and Mayor Mulryan NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None The City Council adjourned to their next regular meeting on Monday, September 17, 1984. JE M. LEONCI�I, ity Clerk APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1984 MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL SRCC MINUTES (Regular) 9/4/84 Page 9.