HomeMy WebLinkAboutCM Oppose Proposition 53QF Agenda Item No: 3_d
CITY
n
Meeting Date: October 3, 2016
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: CITY MANAGER
Prepared by: Rebecca Woodbury, Sr. Management Analyst City Manager Approval.
TOPIC: Proposition 53 Opposition
SUBJECT: Resolution in Opposition to Proposition 53 Revenue Bonds: Statewide Voter
Approval. Constitutional Amendment.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution opposing Proposition 53 regarding statewide voter approval
prior to the issuance or sale of state revenue bonds.
DISCUSSION: This measure would require statewide voter approval prior to the state issuing or selling
any revenue bonds of $2 billion or more for state projects that are financed, owned, operated or managed
by the state or a joint agency created by or for the state. California and its local communities have a
backlog of essential infrastructure needs, including crumbling local streets and roads, unsafe bridges and
overpasses, aging water supply infrastructure, inadequate public transportation systems, and overcrowded
hospitals and universities. By requiring a statewide vote on some local or regional projects, this initiative
would erode local control by empowering voters in distant communities to reject projects which they do not
use and do not fund.
The League of California Cities recommends opposing Proposition 53. This measure would make it more
difficult for state, regional, and local public agencies to use revenue from a common funding source to
finance critical infrastructure projects. This concern is valid as cities and counties could also be members
to joint powers agencies created by the state. Additionally, the broadest interpretation could prevent
critical state improvements in a community, even under the $2 billion threshold, as long as they're
"proximate, physically joined/connected, and/or cannot be complete without the other project." While the
immediate impact on a city from this proposal can be debated, its enactment would set a legal and policy
precedent of having revenue bonds subject to public votes. Such a precedent could lead to future efforts
to expand such a requirement to apply to local government revenue bonds, further limiting local flexibility.
This measure could derail and delay San Rafael's ability to make improvements to critical infrastructure,
including after emergencies and natural disasters.
FISCAL IMPACT: No impact.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution.
OPTIONS:
• Approve the Resolution
■ Modify Resolution and/or Direct Staff to Return with Modifications
• Reject the Resolution
ATTACHMENT: Resolution
FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
File No.: 116 x 9-1
Council Meeting: 10/03/2016
Disposition: Resolution 14201
RESOLUTION NO. 14201
RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSITION 53
WHEREAS, California and its local communities have a backlog of essential
infrastructure needs, including crumbling local streets and roads, unsafe bridges and
overpasses, aging water supply infrastructure, inadequate public transportation
systems, and overcrowded hospitals and universities; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 53 on the November ballot would erode local control and
undermine the ability of cities, counties and other local agencies and the state to form
partnerships to finance the construction of some critical public infrastructure projects;
and
WHEREAS, this initiative would require a statewide vote on certain local
infrastructure projects financed through revenue bonds, where local governments have
joined in a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) in partnership with the state or where the state
was involved in the creation of the JPA; and
WHEREAS, by requiring a statewide vote on some local or regional projects, this
initiative would erode local control by empowering voters in distant communities to
reject projects which they do not use and do not fund; and
WHEREAS, this measure could derail and delay San Rafael's ability to make
improvements to critical infrastructure, including after emergencies and natural
disasters; and
WHEREAS, No on 53 is a growing coalition of organizations representing local
governments, water agencies, public safety leaders, businesses, labor unions,
hospitals, family farmers, environmentalists and educators that have come together to
officially oppose this initiative.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council, on behalf of the
residents of the City of San Rafael, hereby OPPOSES Proposition 53.
I, Esther C. Beirne, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of San Rafael, held on Monday, the 3rd of
October 2016, by the following vote, to wit
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Bushey, Gamblin, McCullough & Mayor Phillips
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Colin
atj�L_ &-_ .
Esther C. Beirne, City Clerk
ROUTING SLIP / APPROVAL FORM
INSTRUCTIONS: Use this cover sheet with each submittal of a staff report before approval
by the City Council. Save staff report (including this cover sheet) along
with all related attachments in the Team Drive (T:) --> CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEMS 4 AGENDA ITEM APPROVAL PROCESS 4 [DEPT -
AGENDA TOPIC]
Agenda Item #
Date of Meeting: 10/3/2016
From: Jim Schutz
Department: City Manager
Date: 9/22/2016
Topic: Proposition 53
Subject: Resolution in Opposition to Proposition 53 Revenue Bonds: Statewide Voter Approval.
Constitutional Amendment.
Type: ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance
❑ Professional Services Agreement ❑ Other: Staff Report
APPROVALS
® Finance Director
Remarks: approved - one minor formatting edit
® City Attorney
Remarks: Approved with minor changes.ETD. 9/23/16
® Author, review and accept City Attorney / Finance changes
Remarks:
® City Manager
Remarks: