HomeMy WebLinkAboutPW PGE Savings by Design2018 SAVINGS BY DESIGN
OWNER AGREEMENT
City of San Rafael
OWNER NAME
PO Box 151560
ADDRESS
Jim Schutz
CONTACT NAME
(415) 485-3475
PHONE NO .
*****0424
Owner Information
FAX NO .
FEDERAL TAX 10 OR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
_SavingsByDesign
AGREEMENT NUMBER PRJ -00990854
(For Program Administration use only)
San Rafael/CA
CITY/STATE
TITLE
Jim.Schutz@cityofsanrafael.org
E-MAIL
TAX COIl'. City
94915
ZIP CODE
STATUS :
Exempt x
Non-CoIl'.
Individual EXEMPT REASON
Pro 'ect Information
City of San Rafael -Fire/Police -SBO for PSC & FS51
PROJECT NAME/LOCATION
1375 5th Avenue
ADDRESS
San Rafael/CA
CITY/STATE
94901
ZIP CODE
01/15/2020
BUILDING TYPE CODE GROSS SQ . FT . CONDITIONED SQ . FT . SIC/NAICs EST. CONSTRUCTION
COMPLETION DATE
ENERGY CALCULATION METHOD :
o Systems Approach
I:8l Whole Building Approach
PROJECT TYPE '
o SimCalc Report
o WBA Report
o Engineering Calcs
[gI New Construction o RenovationlRemodell Addition
ATIACHED DOCUMENTATION:
o Energy Efficiency Report
o Incremental Costs
o Cutsheets
Pro osed Desi n Ene" Savin s Estimate
CODE DESCRIPTION kW kWh Therms $ Amount
CIAJO WBA Owner In centive 11.50 112 ,547 .00 2.751.00 $43.867.45
TOTALS 11.50 112,547.00 2,751.00 $43,867.45
Estimated Incentive:
$43,867.45
Page J of3 2018 SAVINGS BY DESIGN OWNER AGREEMENT
TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
This Agreement is entered into by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (hereafter referred to as "PG&E") and the Owner (as
indicated herein). This Agreement is a one-time offer to provide design assistance and a financial incentive to the Owner
for participation in the Savings By Design Program ("Program ") pursuant to the terms and conditions outlined herein and
in the Savings By Design Program Documents ("Program Documents"). The Program Documents are incorporated into
this Agreement by reference and include the 1) Savings By Design brochure, and the 2) Current (at the date of
signatures) Savings By Design Participant Handbook, which have been provided to the Owner. Funding approved for this
Program is limited and will be paid on a first-come, first-served basis to qualified applicants. Funds will only be reserved
upon PG&E's execution of this Agreement. This incentive offer is subject to the availability of authorized funds . This
Agreement is valid for forty-eight (48) months from the date PG&E executes this Agreement. PG&E will deliver an
executed copy of this Agreement to the Owner after acceptance and execution by PG&E. PG&E reserves the right to
modify or cancel the incentive offer if the actual system(s) installed differs from the proposed installation . PG&E reserves
the right to modify or discontinue this Program without prior notice at its discretion , or by order of the California Public
Utilities Commission ("CPUC "). Payment of the incentives shall be made to the Owner only after all program
requirements are met and upon verification of installation by a PG&E Savings By Design Program Representative .
ELIGIBILITY:
• To be eligible for incentives under this Program, Owner's project must be nonresidential new construction or
renovation/remodel located within PG&E's service territory .
• Owner must install the energy-efficient equipment or system(s) specified in the "Proposed Design and Incentive
Estimate " section of this Agreement (the "Proposed Design ") which at minimum exceeds Title 24 standards or a
generally-accepted industry standard for energy efficiency .
• Installation of any energy-efficient equipment required for compliance with Title 24 will not qualify for incentives under
this Program .
• Energy savings, and incentives based on those savings , will be based on energy efficiency improvements beyond the
minimum, currently in effect, Title 24 requirements, where applicable .
• Specific restrictions apply to each energy efficiency system , as outlined in the Program Documents.
• To be eligible for incentives under this Program, Owner agrees that Owner will not apply for or receive incentives offered
by local or state entities or other utilities for measures covered under this Agreement.
• Incentive Limitations : The CPUC energy efficiency targets established for PG&E and the other investor-owned ut ilities
("IOUs ") in California are based on the amount of energy that the IOUs deliver , excluding load served by non-IOU
sources or suppliers (e xcept Direct Access customers). Based on this statewide policy , PG&E may limit the incentive
amount that Owner is eligible to receive for this project if the projected savings exceed PG&E energy deliveries to the
project.
OWNER AGREES TO:
• Install and operate the Proposed Design in accordance with applicable laws, safety standards, and existing
governmental regulations or orders . Owner agrees to provide proof of permit closure for projects that include HVAC
related measures.
• Provide PG&E with Title 24 compliance documentation plus any other documentation needed to establish the
performance of systems selected . Owner agrees to provide PG&E with all documentation necessary for verification of
installation and performance of energy efficient systems qualifying for incentives .
• Provide manufacturer's specification sheets to PG&E prior to the payment of the incentive . Also , upon request , Owner
agrees to submit vendor and/or contractor invoice(s) to verify that incentive payments will not exceed 75 percent of the
incremental costs associated with the purchase/installation of the energy efficient technologies .
• Accept as final authority, PG&E 's determination of the incentive amount.
• Allow PG&E and CPUC representatives reasonable access to Owner's project site to inspect and verify installation and
operation . Owner understands that said inspection and verification is not an electrical safety inspection.
• Participate in a measurement and evaluation study , if selected. These studies are used to analyze current program
performance and improve future program designs . Owner agrees to fully cooperate with the study team if asked to
participate .
• Indemnify, defend , and hold harmless PG&E , its affiliates , subsidiaries, parent company , officers , directors , agents, and
employees from and against all claims , losses , damages , costs, expenses , and liability ar ising from 1) injury to persons
or property, 2) death , 3) violation of any law or regulation (including those that establish strict liability); so long as such
Page 2 of3 2018 SAVINGS BY DESIGN OWNER AGREEMENT
injury, violation , or strict liability is caused by or in any way connected with Owner's performance of this Agreement.
Owner shall, at Utility request, provide a defense against any claim covered by this indemnity.
• In no instance shall PG&E be liable for any incidental , special, or consequential damages as a result of this Agreement.
• Furthermore, Owner understands that PG&E makes no representations and warranties as to proper installation , product
endorsement, technical feasibility , operational capability , and/or reliability of equipment for which incentives are paid.
Owner agrees not to make any such representations and warranties to third parties and agrees to indemnify PG&E, in
the event said representation and warranties are made to third parties. Owner further acknowledges that any incentive
paid is funded through Public Goods Charges from California ratepayers and that said incentives are intended for the
benefit of customers of California utilities.
• Owner consents to PG&E 's assignment of all Utility rights , duties, and obligations under this Agreement ("Duties ") to the
CPUC or its designee. Such assignment shall relieve PG&E of all Duties arising under this Agreement. Other than such
assignment by PG&E, ne ither Party shall assign its right or delegate its duties without the prior written consent of the
other Party , except in connection with the sale or merger of a substantial portion of its properties . Consent to assignment
shall not be unreasonably withheld . If an assignment is requested , the Owner may be required to provide additional
information if requested by PG&E .
• Owner agrees that PG&E will receive the energy benefit for which the Owner incentive is paid , for a period of not less
than five years or the rated life of the equipment if that is less than f ive years. Owner agrees that if 1) Owner does not
provide PG&E with 100 percent of the related benefits specified in the application , for a period of five years from the
receipt of the incentive , or 2) the energy benefit to PG&E ceases (for example , if Owner's company stops using the
equipment or no longer pays the Public Goods Charge (PGC ), Owner will return to PG&E the prorated portion of the
Owner Incentive dollars based on the actual period of t ime for which Owner provided the energy benefit. Additionally, if
Owner sells the project site, Owner agrees to assign the terms and conditions of this Agreement to the new owner as
part of the sale transaction for the remaining period of performance .
CANCELLATION OF AGREEMENT
PG&E may suspend or terminate the Agreement, without cause , upon written notice to Owner.
TAX LIABILITY:
Incentives may be taxable and will be reported by PG&E to the IRS unless Owner qualifies for an exempt status . PG&E
will report the incentive as income to Owner on IRS Form 1099 unless Owner has established that Owner qua li fies for an
exempt tax status as indicated on this Agreement. Owner is urged to consult a ta x advisor concerning the ta xability of
incentives . PG&E is not responsible for any taxes that may be imposed due to incentive payments.
PG&E MAKES NO WARRANTY , WHETHER STATUTORY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED , INCLUDING , BUT NOT LIMITED
TO ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING THE DESIGN , CONSTRUCTION, EQUIPMENT, OR INSTALLATIONS
REFERRED TO HEREIN, OR THE BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE INSTALLATION , OPERATION , AND USE
OF SUCH EQUIPMENT, OR ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR USE
OR APPLICATION. NO AGENT, EMPLOYEE, OR REPRESENTATIVE OF PG&E HAS AUTHORITY TO BIND PG&E
TO ANY AFFIRMATION , REPRESENTATION , OR WARRANTY UNLESS EXPRESSLY MADE AND AGREED TO IN
WRITING BY PG&E .
By execution of this Agreement, Owner certifies that Owner meets all the program eligibility requirements and that the
information supplied on this Agreement is true and correct. Owner certifies that Owner has read and understands the
Program Documents and agrees to abide by Program rules and requirements set forth in the Program Documents . To be
valid , this Agreement must be signed by all parties prior to Decembe r 31, 2018 .
In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date last set forth below.
CITY OF SAN RAFA
SIGNATURE
i m Schu t z
OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE
City Manager
TITLE
Page 3 of3
6'-/(/t f'
DATE
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
SIGNATURE
Cecilia Tai
PG&E REPRESENTATIVE
Sr. Pro gram M anag er
TITLE DATE
2018 SAVINGS B Y DESIGN OWN ER AGREEMEN T
Savings By Design Energy Savings Report
Project Name: City of San Rafael PSC & FS51
ApplicationlProject #: PRJ -00990854
Tech Review Firm: Lincus Inc.
Reviewed by: Arash Kialashaki
Date Review Completed/Issued: 02/05/2018
Summary
City of San Rafael proposed to build a new Public Safety Center (PSC) in San Rafael, CA, which
is in climate zone 2. The facility will be the Police Station for San Rafael Police Department
(SRPD) and a new replacement Fire Station No 51 for San Rafael Fire Department (SRFD). The
total area of the proposed building is 44,000 sqft, approximately.
This new construction project involves measures from mechanical and electrical equipment and
building envelope and is part of the Savings By Design program. Whole Building Approach is
used for the calculations of the involved measures in the new building. Specifically, the energy
savings of this project will be achieved as result of installing the following energy efficiency
measures:
Construction of effectively-insolated envelope including exterior walls and roof
Installation of high-efficiency lighting system by installation of LED Luminaire
Installation of high-efficiency domestic hot water system
For more information about the included measures, please refer to the submitted energy
efficiency report (document titled "PRJ -00990854_Energy Efficiency Report.pdf').
History of communication between the PG&E Customer Representative, PG&E Engineer, and
customer was submitted on EI. A meeting was held between customer, PG&E, and design team
to discuss Savings by Design program eligibility, maximize on incentives offered,
documentation process. For more information, please refer to the following email
communications and meeting notes:
PRJ -00990854_Energy Efficiency Report.pdf
RE New Local PGE Rep -San Rafael-04262016.msg
RE FTP Site Set-up -SREF -Drawings for FS 52 57 SBD Info! .msg
PGE intro.msg
FW Eco-Charrette.msg
History of communication was reviewed, and no sign of free ridership was detected at the pre-
installation review.
Lighting:
The proposed measure is to install high efficiency lighting systems including LED fixtures.
Interior luminaire schedule was provided by the customer, which outlines the manufacturer,
model number, and technical specifications of the proposed fixtures in page 6 of the document
titled "PRJ -00990854_Elec Plans.pdf'.
The provided EnergyPro models are built based on the quantity and wattage of the proposed
fixtures in each of the interior spaces of the building. Reviewer sampled and verified the quantity
and wattage of the proposed fixtures in the following interior spaces:
Document date: 02/05/2018
Booking Interview 018 , Bicycle Storage 038, Interview Soft 151, Investigation Lieutenant 143,
Investigation Lieutenant 143, Interview 107, Deputy Fire Chief 182, Main Lobby 100.
Since the quantity and wattage of the proposed fixtures in the sampled area matched the provided
electrical plans, reviewer approved the inputs of the lighting system in the submitted EnergyPro
model.
To verify the proposed wattage for the lighting system at the new building, reviewer sampled the
following fixtures and compared their proposed wattage with the manufacturer specification
sheets:
AI: LITHONIA 2BLT 48L ADP EZ1 45 LP840 LATC
B1: LITHONIA 2GTL 4 48L EZ1 LP840
C1: LITHONIA STL4 48L EZ1 LP840
Dl: LITHONIA LDN6 40 15 L06 AR LSS
E 1: LITHONIA IBGN 18000LM SEF AFL
PI: KENALL SCA 4 0 1 45640K DCC 1
The technical specifications of the proposed luminaire match the manufacturer specification
sheets provided by the reviewer: "PRJ-00990854 LightingSpecsheet-PRE .zip". Final quantity,
type, and wattage of the lighting fixtures will be verified at the post-installation stage by using
the manufacturer specification sheets for the installed luminaire.
HVAC:
The proposed building will be served by a high-efficiency VRF system. Based on the PG&E
customized Rulebook V1.3 , "VRF systems in SBD may be included only for the purposes of
setting the incentive rate in the compliance run, but must be modeled as neutral for the whole
building savings claim." The proposed HVAC units were changed to neutrali ze the energy
savings of the VRF system .
Envelope:
The table below outlines the proposed construction assemblies for exterior walls and roof of the
n ew building in the provided energy model for the Public Safety Center :
Tag Specifications V-Factor
EWA-I A 12" Co ncrete 0.630
EWA-lB 10 " Concrete 0.680
EWA-I C 8" Concrete 0.690
EWA-2 8" CMU W/4" MTL 0.15
EWA-2A 8 "CMU 0.570
EWA-3 6" MTL W/2 " Rigid & R-19 0.057
Interior R-1 9 Wall Metal Stud -
Roof 9.5" P ur l ins 60 " OC 5" Rigid Iso 0 .031
In addition, customer proposed to install skylights at the new building with U-Factor of 0.580
and Solar Heat Gain Coefficient of 0.25. Reviewer verified and confirmed the inputs of the
Document date: 02/05/2018
EnergyPro model in the construction assemblies section by reviewing the architectural plans :
"PSC Architectural DD Drawings 11_21 _20 16.pdf'.
Domestic Hot Water
The table below outlines the specification of the proposed DHW system to serve the new Public
Safety Center based on the submitted plumbing plans "PRJ -00990854_Plum Plans .pdf':
Tag Manufacturer Model Gas/Electric Input Storage
Capacity
WH-l Loch inv ar SNR 15l Gas 15 0MBH 90 Gal
WH -2 Loch in var SNR1 5 l Gas 150 MBH 90 Gal
The EnergyPro model inputs for the DHW system match the manufacturer specification sheet of
the units: SWH-03.pdf
During the pre-install review process, it was found that the schedule of the building HVAC and
lighting system in the EnergyPro model was not reasonable for the proposed building type. For
instance, the proposed heating and cooling setpoints of the interior spaces was entered as 95F for
all year. In addition, no load factor was considered for the proposed lighting system at the
building as it was proposed that all lights will be operating 2417 round the year.
Reviewer changed the proposed operation of the building HV AC and lighting systems to Title 24
prescribed operation for the building type by changing the schedule input in the EnergyPro
model to "Undefined". At the post-install stage , the operating hours and HV AC setpoints of the
building will be verified by site inspection observation and reviewing the building EMS, if
available.
Analysis
The project is submitted in the Savings By D esign program. As explained above , the Public
Safety Center consists of San Rafael Police Department and Fire Station No 51 for San Rafael
Fire Department. The energy savings calculations in this SBD project were done using the
Whole Building approach and energy modeling was done in EnergyPro 6. Although the energy
efficiency report (document titled "PRJ -00990854_Energy Efficiency Report.pdf ') stated that
the EnergyPro 6 .7 was used to simulate the energy savings of the project, by reviewing the
submitted UTIL-l reports and date of Title 24 compliance documents, reviewer found that the
applicable baseline is 2013 Title 24 Standards and EnergyPro 6.8 should be used to generate the
compliance margin and energy savings.
Following changes were made in the EnergyPro model of the building to make it compatible
with the Savings By Design guidelines, building construction plans, and expected operation of
the proposed building:
1-The submitted model was built in EnergyPro 6.8 .0.1 and showed the compliance margin
of 16.0%. To adopt the most updated version of the EnergyPro which still uses the sam e
baseline, the model was run in EnergyPro 6.8.0.3. After this change, the compliance
margin was decreased to 15.9%.
2-The proposed building will be served by a VRF system. Based on the PG&E Rulebook ,
VRF systems in SBD may be included only for the purposes of setting the incentive rate
in the compliance run , but must be modeled as neutral for the whole building savings
Document date: 02/05/2018
claim. The VRF system in the submitted model was defined as a series of split system. It
was found that this methodology was not the best modeling strategy to neutralize the
energy savings of VRF system. In the review process, the split units in the submitted
model were changed to "undefined" systems. By making this change, EnergyPro will
incorporate the Title 24 prescribed auto-sized HV AC units with minimum allowable
energy efficiency and excludes the energy savings of these units. After this change, the
compliance margin increased to 26.2%.
3-In addition to the VRF system, the customer proposed to install three unit-heaters. These
units were modeled as split units in the submitted model and their efficiency was not
matching with the provided manufacturer specification sheet. Necessary changes were
made in the model during the review process. These changes did not change the
compliance margin. For more information, please refer to the manufacturer specification
sheet of the proposed unit-heaters: UDAS_TechData.pdf
4-Finally, reviewer noticed that the submitted report shows significant negative energy
usage of the cooling system of the baseline building. This negative energy usage and
unjustified energy savings from the lighting system was found to be results of incorrect
schedules and set points, especially for the heating and cooling set points and lighting
system. Therefore, the assigned schedules and set points of all building systems,
including HVAC and lighting systems, were changed to "undefined". By making this
change, the EnergyPro will automatically incorporate the schedules and set points of Title
24 for each assigned occupancy. These changes did not change the compliance margin.
The final energy savings of the project will be defined at the post-install review stage
based on the actual operating hours, load factors, and set points of the facility.
For more information, please refer to the following EnergyPro models and reports:
Submitted EnergyPro model and report:
PRJ -00990854_Bldg Model.bld
PSC_SBD UTIL-1.pdf
Approved EnergyPro model and report:
PRJ-00990854_Bldg Model-PRE.bld
PRJ-00990854 UTIL-1Report-PRE.pdf
Incremental Measure Cost
The incremental measure cost (IMC) for this project is estimated by the design team in the
energy efficiency report. Total IMC for this project is $1,718,089.00 and includes the
incremental cost of the high efficiency lighting fixtures, VRF systems, and proposed insulation.
The cost of proposed VRF system was excluded from the total IMC since installation of the VRF
system was not an approved measure in this Savings By Design project. The table below outlines
the submitted and approved IMC for the new Public Safety Center at the pre-installation stage:
Item number Description Submitted IMC Approved IMC
1 HV AC System (VRF) $1,511,705.00 -
2 Increased Roof Insulation $52,498.00 $52,498.00
3 Low U-Value Glazing vs. Prescriptive $47,980.00 $47,980.00
4 Increased Exterior Wall Insulation $105,906.00 $105,906.00
Sum $1 ,718 ,089.00 $206,384.00
Document date: 02/05/2018
Based on the "Savings By Design 2017 Participants Handbook", the customer incentive is
limited to 100% of the incremental costs associated with efficiency upgrades with a maximum
project cap of$150,000.00. The OA approved incentive is less than the incremental cost, and is
not cost capped. For more information about the cost analysis of the project, please refer to the
submitted energy efficiency report.
Savings & Incentives
The reviewer used NR SBD Performance calculation mode in the EnergyPro 6.8.0.3 software to
calculate the savings and incentive for this project. The submitted energy reports were generated
using EnergyPro 6.8.0.1. The simulation of the approved model resulted in compliance margin of
35.0%, energy savings of 112,547 kWh, and 11.50 kW and 2,749 therms with a gross incentive
of$43,867.45. The project is not cost-capped at 100% of the IMC. The approved incremental
measure cost was calculated by the reviewer to $206,384.00. The customer submitted savings
were 1,201 therms with a gross incentive of $1,201.00. The reasons for the difference between
the customer's submitted savings and the OA approved values are explained in the calculation
methodology above. It is important to note that per Savings By Design Program Manager's
guidance, the energy usage of the receptacle load was excluded from the compliance margin
calculations. For more information regarding the energy savings and incentive calculations,
please refer to the spreadsheet calculation titled "PRJ-00990854 SavingsCalculations-PRE.xlsx".
The table below shows the summary of the energy savings and incentives for this project:
First-Year Energy Savings Estimated % Below Peak Power Incremental
Energy Efficient Reduction Electricity Gas Measure Cost Title-24
Measures
kW kWh/yr therms $ %
Customer submitted Model 0.00 0.00 1,201 $1,718,089.00 14.9%
OA Approved Model 11 .50 112 ,547 .00 2 ,751 $2 06,384 .00 35.0%
PG&E Incentive Amount
Based on Based Only Based Only on Total Total
Incentives Peak Power on Energy Energy Rates Uncapped Capped Reduction Rates
Rate ($/kW) ($/kWh) ($/therms) Incentive Incentive
Customer submitted Model $0 .00 $0.00 $1,201.00 $1,201.00 $1,201.00
OA Approved Model $1,725 .00 $39,391.45 $2,751.00 $43,867.45 $43,867.45
The site is in San Rafael, CA, which is in climate zone 2. The DEER peak period days for
climate zone 2 are the 8th , 9th , and 10 th of July. To qualify for kW savings, equipment needs to
operate not only during the specific days of DEER peak periods, but also during the hours of
Document date: 02/0512018
2pm-5pm on those specific days. The equipment is proposed to operate during DEER peak
periods and thus does qualify for kW savings.
Customer Incentive:
The OA approved program incentive is $43,867.45 which is calculated using 35.0 Cents/kWh,
$150/kW and $1.00/Therm incentive rates. The calculated incentive is less than 75% of the
estimated incremental measure cost and is not capped.
Design Team Incentive :
The project used the whole building approach and the Design Team Incentive Application has
been submitted: PRJ -00990854_DT App.pdf. Therefore, this project is eligible for design team
incentive. The OA approved amount of the Design Team Incentive is $14,988.47.
Additional Requirements:
The following information is required at the PF stage:
-Revised total project cost (if major changes from OA)
-Spec sheets of installed equipment
-Revised calculations and energy models, if necessary
-Final As-Built construction documents
-Screenshots of the BMS (or any other alternative document) to show the building operation and
BV AC setpoints
Reference Documents:
Customer Submitted Documents
PSC Architectural DD Drawings 11_21_2016.pdf
2017-08-01 _San Rafael PSC T24 Report_PC-1.pdf
FW Eco-Charrette.msg
PGE intro.msg
PRJ -00990854_ Owner_App.pdf
PRJ -00990854_Bldg Model.bld
PRJ -00990854 CPUC Review Checklist.xlsx
PRJ -00990854_DT App.pdf
PRJ -00990854_Elec Plans.pdf
PRJ -00990854_Energy Efficiency Report.pdf
PRJ -00990854_Lighting Specs.zip
PRJ -00990854_Mech Specs.zip
PRJ -00990854_Plum Plans.pdf
PRJ -00990854_ Window Specs.zip
PSC_SBD UTIL-l.pdf
RE FTP Site Set-up -SREF -Drawings for FS 52 57 SBD Info!.msg
Document date: 02/05/2018
RE New Local PGE Rep -San Rafael-04262016.msg
RE SREF -PGE Savings by Design.msg
SBD_Owner App_FS51&PSC.pdf
SR-Planning-Com_ 07-01-2016.pdf
Reviewer Energy Models and Calculations
PRJ-00990854 LightingSpecsheet-PRE.zip
-PRJ-00990854 SavingsCalcs-PRE.xlsx
PRJ-00990854 UTIL-lReport-PRE.pdf
PRJ-00990854_Bldg Model-PRE.bld
SWH-03.pdf
UDAS _TechData (2).pdf
Document date: 02/05/2018