Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Minutes 1992-01-21IN CONFERENCE ROOM 201 OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, TUESDAY, JANUARY 21, 1992, AT 7:00 P.M. (CLOSED SESSION 1. DISCUSSION OF LITIGATION AND LABOR NEGOTIATIONS - File 1.4.1.a No. 92-2(a) - #2 No. 92-2(b) - #7 No reportable action was taken. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, TUESDAY, JANUARY 21, 1992, AT 8:00 P.M. Regular Meeting: San Rafael City Council Paul M. Cohen, Councilmember (Arr. 9:30 PM) Michael A. Shippey, Councilmember Joan Thayer, Councilmember Also Present:Pamela J. Nicolai, City Manager Gary T. Ragghianti, City Attorney Jeanne M. Leoncini, City Clerk (CONSENT CALENDAR Present: Albert J. Boro, Mayor Dorothy L. Breiner, Councilmember Absent: Councilmember Breiner moved and Councilmember Shippey seconded, action on the following Consent Calendar items: ITEM 2.Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of January 6, 1992 (CC) 3.Request for Authorization to Transfer Funds from Bedroom Tax to Cover City's Expenditures for Pickleweed Park Basketball Court (PW) - File 9-3-65 x 9-3-66 x 12-5 4.Status Report on Baywood Subdivision (PW) - File 5-1-314 None to approve the recommended RECOMMENDED ACTION Approved as submitted. Approved staff recommendation. Accepted report. 7.Adoption of Resolution Amending Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 8592 - AMENDING No. 8111 Pertaining to Compensation and RESOLUTION NOS. 5929, 6078, 6415, Working Conditions for San Rafael Police 6689, 7206, 7656 AND 8111 PERTAINING Association (Pers) - File 7-8-3 x 7-3 x TO THE COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDI- 9-3-30 TIONS FOR POLICE ASSOCIATION PERSONNEL (Effective 7/1/91 - 6/30/92) AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Shippey, Thayer & Mayor Boro (NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Cohen The following items were removed from the Consent Calendar for further discussion: S.STATUS REPORT ON UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS (PW) - File 4-3-235 x 13-1 x 9-3-40 x 1-6-1 Councilmember Thayer expressed concern over the expense of the necessary retrofitting, and finding a medium ground whereby building owners can comply with the City's requirements without too much financial hardship. She stated it appears that there will be considerable expense involved. Public Works Director Bernardi stated he will come back in February for consideration of the first reading of the Ordinance. He stated that a committee of building owners, business owners, structural engineers, architects and other interested parties has provided valuable feedback to staff. He noted that a general meeting of all property owners was held early in the process, and it was determined that the major issues were the cost and timing of any required repair work. He stated there has been considerable discussion as to what level of repair work is needed which would both reduce the potential for loss of life and injury, while limiting the economic impact on the community. As a result, it was agreed that the buildings would be upgraded to the extent that the occupants could exit safely; however, the building could still be damaged beyond repair in the event of an earthquake. Councilmember Thayer inquired about the handicapped access requirement, and if it would be done at the same time. Mr. Bernardi stated that the City would not be able to waive the handicapped access issue, and it would have to be done. He added that it was the Council's intent to not upgrade the wiring, just to strengthen the building and the wiring would be affected only if it is involved in the structural changes. He noted this would have to be on a case-by-case basis. He stated that the owner of a building hopefully would not have to have all of his tenants leave during the process, and though there would be some inconvenience to tenants, staff does not anticipate there would be an impact on many tenants having to leave. Councilmember Breiner inquired about making sure that bracing would be effective so that additions to the building would not fall. Mr. Bernardi responded that parapets or additions to the facade would have to be secure so they could not fall. Mayor Boro added that life safety for the people on the street, as well as the people in the buildings, must be considered. Mr. Bernardi agreed. Mayor Boro noted that he feels most of the work could be done without emptying the buildings, and this should be done only in extreme cases. He then suggested that staff meet with the property owners and architects and come back with a plan, to assure that the Downtown area would not suffer a shut -down. In that connection, Mayor Boro recommended that consideration should be given to tying this in with the Downtown Plan. Mayor Boro stated that the Ordinance should be specific with regard to compliance, and it should be clearly understood that we are serious about getting this done within the time frame specified, and any penalties which would be levied for noncompliance should be affirmed. Mayor Boro added that Mr. Bernardi has said he would be happy if any two of the Councilmembers would be interested in becoming ad hoc Members of the Committee. Mr. Bernardi stated he will send all of the Councilmembers notification of when the meetings are being held, and would appreciate having Councilmembers in attendance. Councilmember Breiner agreed that they do not want to close the Downtown area, and noted that because Santa Cruz did not move forward on its seismically structuring and reinforcement of buildings, they have a closed redevelopment area because so many buildings collapsed and are uninhabitable, and she feels it is very important to move forward as quickly as possible. Councilmember Shippey noted that there might be some loss of development rights involved under certain circumstances, and he would like to have a legal opinion on that issue at the time this is agendized again. Councilmember Thayer moved and Councilmember Breiner seconded, to accept the report. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Shippey, Thayer & Mayor Boro NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Cohen 6.APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP - RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL C, SMITH RANCH HOMES (PW) - File 5-1-290 Councilmember Thayer inquired why the City is not accepting the easement. Mr. Bernardi responded that the City is not interested in accepting the easement, and that in order to be included on the Map of Smith Ranch Homes, the easements are offered to the City, and the City rejects the offer. Councilmember Thayer moved and Councilmember Shippey seconded, to adopt the Resolution approving the Parcel Map as recommended. RESOLUTION NO. 8593 - APPROVING PARCEL MAP OF SUBDIVISION ENTITLED, "RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL C, SMITH RANCH HOMES" (Authorizing the City Clerk to reject the dedication of the easements for public use, as shown on the map) AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Shippey, Thayer & Mayor Boro NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Cohen 8.ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 8504 TO INCREASE THE SALARY RANGE OF THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER POSITION (Pers) - File 7-3 x 9-3-40 x 9-3-17 Councilmember Shippey inquired if the salary, as shown on the Resolution, should say "per month". City Manager Nicolai responded that when the salary range is shown on a Resolution, it does not customarily specify that it is per month, but she could amend the Resolution accordingly. Councilmember Breiner noted that San Mateo advertised for a Traffic Engineer/Civil Engineer, and inquired if the City's Traffic Engineer is also a Senior Civil Engineer position, and does the Traffic Engineer fill both positions. Ms. Nicolai responded that the classification does not mean that our Traffic Engineer would necessarily be doing the work, but will be sharing more of the Planning Traffic issues. Councilmember Shippey moved and Councilmember Breiner seconded, to adopt the Resolution as recommended, with the addition of "per month" to the salary range. RESOLUTION NO. 8594 - AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 8504 TO INCREASE THE SALARY RANGE FOR THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER JOB CLASSIFICATION (From $3,768.94 -$4,353.55 per mo., to $4,121.21- $4,871.32 per mo.) AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Shippey, Thayer & Mayor Boro NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Cohen 9.ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION FOR PEACE CONVERSION TO SATISFY LOCAL NEEDS (CM) - File 120 x 9- 1 Councilmember Thayer stated she had spoken with someone today and apparently there is to be public input on this item, and for that reason she is recommending it be removed from the Consent Calendar. Mayor Boro stated that if the Council is going to receive testimony, the item will have to be moved to New Business. The Council agreed that this item be heard under New Business. 10.PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL OF HANDICAPPED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS - 965 GRAND AVENUE (PW) - Mayor Boro declared the Public Hearing opened. Public Works Director Bernardi briefed the Council, stating that at the January 6, 1992 Council meeting an Appeal was considered, regarding the requirement to retrofit an existing restroom at 965 Grand Avenue. He noted that the tenant improvements were estimated at $7,000, while retrofitting of the restroom was estimated at $7,500. Mr. Bernardi added that the Council continued the Public Hearing in order to obtain additional information from staff regarding responsibilities under handicapped access laws. Mr. Bernardi reported that he has had discussions with Mr. Diosi who is the licensing agent for the property, and who indicated the Appellant's intention is to have three small tables for patrons who wish to have a cup of coffee and pastry. Mr. Diosi indicated this is an integral part of the operation of this business. Mr. Bernardi stated staff has also reviewed this issue with the City Attorney's office and discussed the California Health and Safety Code, which provides that any remodeling of private property must include handicapped access. Staff has interpreted this to mean that a building permit applicant will be required to retrofit facilities and if the tenant makes application, they would pay for the retrofitting. However, the Americans With Disabilities Act will become effective on January 26, 1992 and this Federal legislation requires that all property owners retrofit facilities located on property owned by them. He stated that thus, irrespective of this appeal, the property owner will be responsible for retrofitting the restroom in question. Mr. Bernardi stated that if the Council wishes to grant a waiver tonight, the business owner would be able to occupy the site by January 26, 1992. He added that Assistant City Attorney Belue offered a number of factors applying to hardship, such as the small size of the business with only two employees; the fact that the remodel will cost approximately $7,000 and the retrofitting would cost approximately $7,500; the type of establishment, which does not prepare the food and will mainly be take-out. These could be the findings. Also, the Council would be acknowledging that the Federal law which is not enforceable by the City will be in effect this month. Councilmember Breiner inquired if the Resolution comes back on February 3, 1992, would it be included in the Resolution that the property owner immediately comply. Mr. Bernardi responded that the Department of Justice would be the agency for that requirement. City Attorney Ragghianti stated the language could be put into the Resolution and it will definitely send a message to the owner, but the City should not get involved in a business relationship with the owner. Mrs. Breiner stated the owner should be aware of that, going into it. Councilmember Shippey stated the Council does need to make findings in order to have the waiver, but the law will be in effect within the week. Councilmember Thayer noted that from working with real estate investors that a tenant may apply for a permit, but sometimes it is for the owner. Mr. Tony Diosi stated that in San Rafael the permit is taken out by the tenant and not the owner. Councilmember Breiner inquired of City Attorney Ragghianti if the Council has a Resolution at the next meeting outlining the hardship situation, would that weaken our case later on, when we let the Department of Justice know. Mr. Ragghianti replied he does not think so. He stated the Applicant has the right to have his application granted now, or denied; and that if findings are made to grant the waiver on a hardship basis, it is an anomaly that five or six days later there is legislation at the Federal level which requires the owner to do what the tenant has just been granted a waiver on because of hardship. He stated that the owner will have to comply with the law, regardless of what the Council does here, and in his judgment that the Council should act on this application now, in accordance with the law which presently exists. There being no public input, the Public Hearing was closed. Mayor Boro stated he agrees with Councilmember Breiner that the Resolution should be very clear that the Appeal is granted to the Applicant and not to the property or the property owner. Mayor Boro noted that there is some inconsistency between the State requirements and the Federal law. He asked the staff to clarify this issue, and inform the Council. Mr. Bernardi responded that the State is working right now on revisions to the current State Code and, at this point, it is unclear whether the State will pass on the responsibility of enforcement to local governments or retain the responsibility for themselves. He promised to keep the Council informed of developments. Councilmember Thayer moved and Councilmember Shippey seconded, that findings be made that hardship exists and that the Council should grant the Appeal. Councilmember Shippey noted that he is seconding the motion with the provision that the language provided by Mrs. Breiner is included, with regard to the property owner. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Shippey, Thayer & Mayor Boro NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Cohen Mayor Boro noted that staff will submit the Resolution at the next Council meeting, February 3, 1992. 11.PUBLIC HEARING - TO CONSIDER RATE INCREASE FOR MARIN SANITARY SERVICE GARBAGE COLLECTION (Fin) - File 4-3-32 x 13-2 Mayor Boro declared the Public Hearing opened. Finance Director Coleman informed the Council that the accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche has reviewed the financial data submitted by Marin Sanitary Service and recommends a rate increase of 9.37% for garbage collection, effective January 1, 1992. He stated there is no rate increase recommended for recycling. He explained that the rate increase is due to two main reasons for the increase: 1) A 69% increase in the tipping fees at Redwood Landfill, increasing from $29.33 per ton to $49.56 per ton in February, which will add approximately $900,000 to costs in 1992. 2) An expansion of the green can program from 3,300 customers to 9,300 customers, which will add $185,000 to costs in 1992. Mr. Coleman noted that some agencies are increasing the multi -can rates more than 9.37% in order to encourage recycling, but there is no evidence to indicate that this will lead to more recycling. He stated that San Rafael has about the lowest percent of customers with multi -can use, so he would not recommend any changes in the rate structure this year. He stated that a multi -can user is currently billed at two-thirds of the first can rate, which covers the cost; however, some agencies feel that if the multi -cans are at 90% of the first can rate, those people will do more recycling. Mr. Coleman reported that there is no change recommended in the $1.75 recycling rate, and that surpluses generated from previous years' operations will be used to offset any shortfall for 1992. Eric Gilbert, of Deloitte & Touche, addressed the Council, giving the background of how the rates were determined, and explaining the green can service, and the increase in tipping fees at the Redwood Landfill and its impact on the capital investment of Marin Sanitary Service. He stated there may be some decline in the recycling prices next year, but that is a difficult thing to predict. He said their process is set up so there is a lid on how much prices can increase or decrease in any given year, and the objective of that is to smooth out the salvage price changes from year to year so they do not have constant changes in the recycling surcharge. He said that is one reason they are holding firm on the proposed surcharges. Councilmember Breiner inquired of Mr. Gilbert, if we did not allow profit on the tipping fee increase, would Marin Sanitary Service still be within the industry norm level possibility. Mr. Gilbert replied they would be below it, by a significant margin. Mrs. Breiner then inquired, how was the 7.4% increase in administrative costs arrived at, involving cost of living and other elements. Mr. Gilbert responded there were significant changes in health and welfare costs, as well as pension costs; another element is salaries. Also, the computer programming has been upgraded to provide more information, and assist in computations, such as the multi -can rates. Attorney Albert Bianchi, representing Marin Sanitary Service, first addressed the tipping fee increases. He stated that those are the costs charged by Redwood Sanitary Landfill in Novato, which is now owned by a Texas corporation which is buying landfills throughout the United States, and there is no present way of regulating that agency. He stated he would like to see those charges remain lower, but there is no way to control them. However, he noted that Mr. Garbarino is looking into other possibilities that may result in lowering of those charges. With respect to allowing profits on the increased tipping fees, as recommended by the independent accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche, Mr. Bianchi stated the increase should be awarded to Marin Sanitary Service, as they are within the range of all of the indices that govern companies of this size and type. Regarding the second can charges, he stated the charge being suggested for the second can is 90% of the charge for the first can, and three of the five jurisdictions served by Marin Sanitary Service; Larkspur, Ross and Sanitary District #1, have already approved the surcharge. He stated that does not add any money to the bottom line, but is a redistribution among the customers, and the purpose is to encourage recycling, noting it does the Company no harm or benefit, either way. He stated that Las Gallinas Sanitary District is considering 100% for the second can. He noted that the North San Rafael Coalition of Residents has written a letter supporting the charge. Nadine Muller, Chief Financial Officer for Marin Sanitary Service, discussed commercially compacted refuse. She indicated that if they have to take in items that they cannot recycle, then they want to charge 21times the normal rate for that. She stated they have a real problem with restaurants, glass companies and carpet companies, where a cubic yard of debris can weigh over 300 pounds, giving as an example where restaurants pull out all of their cans and bottles and all that is left is the wet garbage, which is very heavy. She stated for that reason they are requesting that commercial boxes exceeding 300 pounds per cubic yard, without recyclables, be subject to a tonnage surcharge of $66.24 per ton. She said that is their cost, once it has been dropped at the Transfer Station, to be delivered to Redwood Landfill. She also recommended that the Council approve the 90% multi -can surcharge on the second can. Mayor Boro verified that the second can rate will go from $16.95 to $18.55 with the 9.37% increase. Ms. Muller replied that is correct. Mayor Boro noted the fee will be $21.60 if the 90% is adopted, and that the 63% takes care of all of the Marin Sanitary costs. Ms. Muller stated that is correct, but that if the 90% is approved, there will be some migration down to one can if you implement the 90%. She noted that if there is any excess revenue from having the 90%, that would go to offset any rate increase next year on the first can. Mayor Boro stated that in San Rafael the rates are different than the other jurisdictions, and you are recovering all of the costs for the garbage picked up in San Rafael, so San Rafael is not being subsidized by any other cities. He said the fact that other cities are implementing the 90%, that they may be able to reduce their rates next year. Ms. Muller agreed. Councilmember Thayer inquired does the second can pay for itself. Ms. Muller responded that the way the rates are set right now, we are taking all the revenue and all the expenses, but have not broken it down as to the cost of the second can, per se, but it can be done. Mr. Coleman noted that you can take the cost information and come up with several ways to look at it. He stated if you look at 64 gallon instead of 32 gallon cans, it costs $3.42 more per month plus a small amount for depreciation, which is the main cost of servicing the extra can. He stated if we look at the extra cost of servicing the second can, the present fees are covering that cost. We are adding more onto that, not for cost reasons, but to encourage recycling. Councilmember Breiner addressed the cost of bringing cans to the curb, and whether those who do this are subsidizing the people who do not. Mr. Bianchi responded that has been the case, but will not in the future. He said Marin Sanitary has provided the cans with wheels and the people who do not bring their cans to the curb necessitate the garbage collectors to retrieve them, and they should pay for it. Mr. Coleman stated there is an extra charge for people who do not bring their cans to the curb, which has been in place for several years. What is being proposed is that there be a separate truck which comes along only to retrieve those cans not at the curb. The cost would be $64,000, and will not be reflected this year in the bill for the person who does not bring his can to the curb, but when the program is evaluated there will probably be an extra charge next year. Mr. Bianchi noted that there will be exceptions for handicapped people and others who cannot bring their cans to the curb. Joe Garbarino, owner of Marin Sanitary, noted that there are some areas where they cannot get the garbage trucks to the curb, and have to use pickup trucks. Also, some homes have 300 or 400 foot driveways, and you cannot expect other people to subsidize the situation. He asked that the Council think about the 90% on the second can. He noted that the more recycling is done, the more the landfill is costing. He stated that AB 939 is a major issue, with the mandate for reducing recycling 25% by 1995. He stated they are over 40% right now. There being no further public input, the Public Hearing was closed. Mayor Boro summarized, stating that the three new issues are; the compact surcharge being increased to 21� times for non -recyclable material; the $66.24 tonnage surcharge for large debris boxes filled with non-recyclables; and each multi -can to be charged at 90% of the first can rate. He noted that when you speak of one can, you are referring to a 32 -gallon can. If you have a 64 -gallon can you are paying an extra 63% of the first can. He stated this is not being presented as an increase, but to encourage people to recycle. He noted that the City is currently meeting its goals on recycling. Councilmember Shippey stated he was hoping the Council would have more evidence that this would encourage recycling, and they have heard some testimony that it will by raising the surcharge on the second can. He stated that 60% of the users in San Rafael use one can, and you are still benefiting the majority of the people by going to the 90% rate. Mayor Boro noted the question he has is whether this will work to encourage recycling. In theory, 40% of the people would go to one can. He noted someone said about 10% of the people will go to one can. He stated there is a question of imposing this increase on a rate payer at this point in time. He noted that three agencies are already imposing the 90%, and he would like to wait and see how it turns out. Councilmember Breiner stated that for those who may not be aware of this particular issue that it might be wise to hold that part of the item over and schedule it for the next meeting, so that those people who might have come down would be able to hear the rationale behind it. Councilmember Thayer stated in regard to AB 939, that as part of the work of the Waste Management Advisory Committee in order to produce an Integrated Waste Management Plan for all the jurisdictions in Marin County, one of the things seriously considered was variable rates, because alot can be done in the way of recycling, but very little is done by individuals in the way of source reduction. Source reduction makes the individual accountable to buy products that do not produce as much waste; therefore, there is less to put into their cans or to recycle. She noted that statistics indicated that variable rates that had been tried in other jurisdictions did work. She noted that in San Rafael we have achieved 37% recycling rate, but that includes incineration which will be taken away from us. She stated we are not quite at the 25% rate required by 1995, noting that if we do not meet the requirements of AB 939, we will incur a $10,000 a day fine. She noted she would endorse the 90% rate for multi -cans. Councilmember Shippey stated that ultimately this is a policy decision, and noted that the 90% compromise was used by three of the four other jurisdictions. Mayor Boro asked could this be put over so the public could be given an opportunity to understand this point. He asked if this is not approved tonight but is done subsequently, what would happen? Mr. Garbarino replied that the City would not be in line with the other jurisdictions, and urged the Council to approve the agreement as presented. Councilmember Breiner noted that San Anselmo and Corte Madera now have a small can rate and wondered if San Rafael could institute the small can rate as part of the package at the same time as raising the rate for the second can. Mr. Garbarino stated he was opposed to the small can because he would have to modify his equipment in order to handle a 20 gallon can. He also mentioned that his company is the only one with the green cans. He would like to have pickup every other week for the green cans, and would like to be able to pick up the garbage every other week and then keep the cost down. He stated they will be expanding their green can pilot program this year to almost half of the residents and the following year to all the residents. Mayor Boro asked for two separate votes on the Resolution, so they can vote separately on the 90% surcharge. Councilmember Shippey moved and Councilmember Breiner seconded, to adopt the Resolution authorizing signing of the contract with Marin Sanitary Service, contract amended to include the compact surcharge and tonnage surcharge on debris boxes. RESOLUTION NO. 8595 - AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING OF A CONTRACT, LEASE OR AGREEMENT (w/Marin Sanitary Service, 26th Amendment to the Agreement, garbage rates only) AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Shippey, Thayer & Mayor Boro NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Cohen Councilmember Shippey moved and Councilmember Thayer seconded, to approve the 90% surcharge. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Shippey & Thayer NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Boro ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Cohen Councilmember Breiner stated she realizes there is a State requirement for weekly pickup, but is there a way to reach households which have a small can, or have pickup every other week. Patty Garbarino stated they have been trying to work that out. Councilmember Thayer stated she would like information on how the green can program is working out. Ms. Muller replied that 75% of the people that have the green cans are putting something out every week, noting they have been very well received. She stated if the State will not go along with every other week service, there may be a way around it by having pickup for the green can one week and the garbage can the other week, thereby having weekly service, noting that is what they are hoping to do. Councilmember Breiner stated she wants notification to everyone so they will understand the reason for the surcharge. Ms. Muller stated that over the next three months all customers will be notified with their billings. (Councilmember Cohen arrived at meeting.) 12.STATUS REPORT ON SAN RAFAEL CANAL DREDGING (PW) - File 12-10 x 9-3-40 Public Works Director Bernardi referred to Paragraph 3 in the staff report, and noted that the test results on the contaminated soil should read that the oil and grease were reduced from 2200 ppm to approximately 100 ppm. He stated that if it is reduced below 100 ppm the Redwood Landfill could use it as fill. He stated that this might be a pilot program for the entire Bay Area, which would greatly reduce the cost for disposal of dredged soils in San Francisco Bay. He expects that it will assist in obtaining funding from the Corps of Engineers. Mr. Bernardi stated he will have a further report at the next Council meeting. Councilmember Shippey moved and Councilmember Breiner seconded, to accept the report. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Cohen, Shippey, Thayer & Mayor Boro NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None Mayor Boro called for hearing of Item 9, deferred from Consent Calendar. 9.ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION FOR PEACE CONVERSION TO SATISFY LOCAL NEEDS (CM) - File 120 x 9- 1 Greg Brockbank, a San Rafael resident, urged the Council to pass the Resolution, and thanked them for bringing it forward. He noted that over 50% of San Rafael residents' income tax money goes to the military. Dorothy Vesecky, of the Human Rights Resource Center, noted the ways in which tax money could be spent in the community, rather than going to the Federal Government. Councilmember Breiner moved and Councilmember Shippey seconded, to adopt the Resolution as recommended. RESOLUTION NO. 8596 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL FOR PEACEI CONVERSION TO SATISFY LOCAL NEEDS AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Cohen, Shippey, Thayer & Mayor Boro NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None 13.APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER AS AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT COORDINATOR (CA) - File 13-1-1 x 9-3-11 Councilmember Breiner moved and Councilmember Cohen seconded, to adopt the Resolution as recommended. RESOLUTION NO. 8597 - APPOINTING SUZANNE COLT, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, AS THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COORDINATOR FOR THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Breiner, Cohen, Shippey, Thayer & Mayor Boro NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:40 P.M. 1992 JEANNE M. LEONCINI, City Clerk APPROVED THIS DAY OF , MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL