Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-06-20_cityofsanrafael_288d2d9050d0eee2bb3977bda4037d8fCITY OF
1� UL...
Agenda Item No: 20
Meeting Date: June 20, 2011
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: City Attorney's Office
Prepared by: Lieutenant Dan Fink
City Manager Approval: . w
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Rafael
Approving and Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the City of San Rafael Response to the 2010-2011
Marin County Grand Jury Report Entitled "Gangs of Marin: A Tale of Two Counties."
BACKGROUND:
The 2010-2011 Marin County Grand Jury has issued its report, dated May 18, 2011, entitled "Gangs of
Marin: A Tale of Two Counties." Based upon its research and interviews with representatives from law
enforcement, juvenile hall, the Public Defender's Office, The Office of the District Attorney, The
Probation Department, San Quentin line staff, civilian volunteers and others, the Grand Jury's report
describes gang issues in Marin by comparing the two segments of the community, one being law abiding
citizens and the second being gang members. The report stated that most of the time each segment lives
in its own insulated world. However, the report noted that the two segments overlap more regularly in
recent times. The report gives credit to the Marin residents who are vigilant in their quest to keep gang
activity out of Marin County and felt that our activity does not compare to other counties who have bigger
gang issues. The report also complimented the interaction and communications between the agencies in
Marin who work hard to keep the gang activity to a minimum. The Grand Jury has made ten findings and
two recommendations regarding the scope of the gang problem in Marin County and what additional
steps should be taken, and has submitted the report to the County of Marin, the City of San Rafael, and
the City of Novato for a formal response.
ANALYSIS:
The Grand Jury's findings and recommendations are set out on pages 20 and 21 of the report, a copy of
which is attached hereto. The Grand Jury's recommendations are primarily directed towards the County
of Marin, the City of San Rafael, and the City Of Novato and urge the Marin County law enforcement
community to continue with nighttime gang sweep in order to keep the community safe, and to evaluate
existing databases that that can be used by law enforcement by the end of 2011.
The City has been asked to respond to Recommendation Rl and R2 and Police Lieutenant Dan Fink has
prepared a draft response to the Grand Jury report for consideration and approval by the City Council.
FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
File No.:
Council Meeting:
Disposition:
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Palle: 2
The proposed response indicates agreement with the Grand Jury's findings and notes that both
recommendations have already been implemented.
ACTION REQUIRED:
The City is required to respond to the Grand Jury Report. Penal Code section 933(c) states in part:
"No later than 90 days after the Grand Jury submits a final report ... the governing body of
the public agency shall comment to the presiding Judge of the Superior Court on the
findings and recommendations... [contained in the report]."
To comply with this statute, the City's response to the Grand Jury report must be approved by Resolution
of the City Council and submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Marin County Superior Court and the
Foreperson of the Grand Jury on or before August 18, 2011. A proposed Resolution is attached that
would approve the City's response.
OPTIONS:
The City is required to respond, however, the Council could make changes to the proposed response and
then adopt the Resolution and revised response. Alternatively, the Council could return the response to
staff for further study and return to the Council for its July 5th meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the proposed response to
the Grand Jury report and authorizing the Mayor to execute the response.
ATTACHMENTS:
Grand Jury report dated May 18, 2011
Resolution with attached proposed. response
2010-2011 MARO COUNTY CIVIL GRA/T JURY
Gangs of Marin:
A Tale of Two Counties
Report Pate: May 18, 2011
Public Release Pate: May 25, 2011
po*
Marin County Civil Grand Jury
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
SUMMARY
Marin is not just a geography, it is a lifestyle. Affluent citizens' walk safe streets with lives
largely insulated from the majority of criminal influences found in neighboring counties.
Residents pay for this privileged lifestyle with their taxes, their votes and an extensive
commitment of volunteer time to the community. Marin is not the place where one would
expect the specter of gangs to appear on anyone's radar much less rise to a level that would
generate a Grand July investigation.
The first gang investigation was found recorded in the Grand Jury archives of 1996 and the
most recent in 2008. The latter report titled: "Gangs of Marine " concluded: "Marin has
criminal street gangs, but they are small relative to the size of our population." The report
went on to say, "Marin's gangs are less violent and their numbers are growing more slowly
than in other Bay Area communities,"
Early during the tenure of the current Grand Jury, it was brought to the attention of the jurors
that Marin gang crimes were being reported in the local media with increasing regularity.
Even more concerning than the arguably small numbers was the reported level of violence. It
was escalating from property crimes to knifings and shootings. On the surface, that seemed
to contradict the Grand Jury report of 2008 and an additional investigation was deemed
necessary to validate or repudiate the issue.
An intensive interview process was undertaken. Without exception, every interview with
over two -dozen expert witnesses who interact with local gangs regularly started with the
question: "Do we have an escalating Gang problem in Marin?" The response in every case,
except for two was an emphatic "yes!"
A rigorous search was then launched for pertinent local gang crime statistics; however, the
jury found such information to be virtually non-existent or spotty at best. The small amount
of data that does exist can be interpreted to support any point of view. The best interpretation
we could make by analyzing the nominal data available was that the increase in crime is
"probably" not significant.
I In April 2011, the Federal Bureau of Economic Analysis pronounced Marin to be the richest county in California and fourth richest in the
United States,
2 Marin County Grand Jury Website - "Gangs of Marin" Report and Responses dated May 14, 2008
http;/Sv +w.co,nririn,ca.us/deptslG.lhmain/cvgijr/2007gj/index2007.cfin
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 1 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
This morass of contradictions demanded an even more in-depth investigation, What resulted
was recognition that we were asking the wrong question. Instead of asking if gang crime was
escalating in frequency and ferocity, we needed to ask why Marin gang crime was
perceptively lower than that experienced by our neighboring counties.
It is true that Marin County is economically, geographically and sociologically insulated
from the classical roots of gang crime. One Marin Police Chief we interviewed credited our
safe community to the recognition that "Marin citizens just refuse to tolerate gang crime."
At San Quentin, prisoners told us that we citizens of Marin must `Walls the Talk', Marin
citizens do just that. Refusal to tolerate gang crime manifests itself in Marin through the
creative, proactive, and collaborative efforts of the courts, Marin law enforcement, Probation,
involved citizens, Educators, and County and City governments. They have seen and
recognized the potential havoc gangs can wreak on our society (but mostly on our youth) and
they are working diligently to keep Marin's proverbial "finger in the dike" to keep local gang
activity at a trickle in Marin rather than a torrent.
The body of this largely informational report is intended to shed light on the various facets of
a very complex topic by providing the reader the same information this Grand Jury was
privileged to examine. It looks at specific Marin gang issues from the point of view of
people who are committed to diminishing the influence of local gangs. It specifies programs
and activities that are working well to lessen their impact and finally, it garners helpful
insights from current gang members in their own words and, where prudent, even in their
own vernacular.
By having the facts and insights, each reader can come to his/her own conclusions regarding
this volatile issue. The Grand Jury has issued this report in an effort to clarify the amount of
activity presently being conducted to keep us gang -safe as well as the severity of ignoring the
potential problems and letting the issues go unchecked.
BACKGROUND
All grand juries undergo extensive training immediately after taking their oath of office. A
large portion of that training comes from department heads in the County defining their roles
and the present state of affairs of their organization. During that period, a number of law
enforcement and court personnel shared their perceptions of recent escalations of gang
activity. Those testimonies alone would have provided sufficient impetus for another
investigation by the Grand Jury, however interest was supplemented by the perception by
many that there appeared to be an increasing number of news reports regarding gang activity
in the County. Typical headlines that garnered attention included:
Man stabbed outside Novato restaurant - Marin Independent Journal 07/26/2010
Mill Valley man (gang member) charged with murder in Marin City stabbing - Marin
Independent Journal 12/20/2010
Woman arrested in Novato (gang) shooting at Hamilton Safeway - Marin
Independent Journal 01/03/2011
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 2 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
Novato woman charged in gang attack as shooter remains at large - Marin
Independent Journal 01/05/2011
Novato police name second suspect in gang shooting - Marin Independent
Journal 01/11/2011
Suspect in Hamilton Gang Shooting Arrested in Rohnert Park - Novato Patch
12/13/2011
• Gang suspect eludes manhunt in Point Reyes seashore - Pacific Sun 01/04/2011
• Novato officials take aim at gang activity - Marin Independent Journal 01/05/2011
• San Rafael gang patrol yields weapons arrest - Marin Independent Journal
02/03/2011
• Novato teen cited for gang graffiti - Novato Advance 02/05/2011
• Novato teen charged as adult in San Rafael (gang related) gun incident - Marin
Independent Journal 02/08/2011
• Novato police link three youths (gang members) to theater graffiti - Marin
Independent Journal 02/11/2011
• Novato takes action against gang graffiti -Novato Advance 02/22/2011
• City (Novato) toughens graffiti ordinance (Vandalism linked to gang activity) - Marin
Independent Journal 04/13/2011
• Gang suspect accused of gun threat over soda - Marin Independent Journal
04/16/2011
• Three San Rafael juveniles arrested for suspicion of firing at rival gang members -
Novato Advance 4/25/2011
• Man stabbed to death during California (Gerstle Park in San Rafael) gang fight - San
Francisco Chronicle 5/12/2011
The most disturbing among these incidents was the double shooting at a popular Novato
shopping center. That incident engendered a white -paper' by city officials to officers and
citizens of the City of Novato discussing the event and clarifying how law enforcement was
working to neutralize the threat. With all this information before us, the Grand Jury felt it
most appropriate to launch a detailed investigation into all aspects of gang activity in Marin
County and verify the present status of gang crime.
METHODOLOGY
This investigation started with the Grand Jury interviewing a representative cross section of
Marin's law enforcement community. This group included police chiefs and administrative
officers as well as deputies, detectives, and patrol officers. We talked with representatives
from the Sheriffs Office, the Public Defender's office, local Homeland Security, Juvenile
Hall, the Office of the District Attorney, the Probation Department and San Quentin line staff
and civilian volunteers. These interviewees represented various public safety organizations
but their individual testimonies were consistent. Without exception, law enforcement
expressed concern based on personal experiences that there was significant increase in gang
3 Novato Patch: City documents its steps to combat gang violence; January 4, 2011
lit tp:!/iN,Nvw. novato.patclh. cum
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 3 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
crime in the County, especially near the end of 2009 and continuing into 2010. The
investigation then progressed by gathering more detailed information from people outside
law enforcement but still closely associated with gang activity. They included management
and staff of local community and youth organizations, County educators, Youth Court
officers, elected officials, and private individuals and organizations engaged in gang
prevention and mediation.
Finally, the interviews were supplemented with first-hand experiences. With the exceptional
support and endorsement of Marin law enforcement (and with special thanks to the Probation
Department), the Grand Jury was invited to ride along with cross jurisdictional law
enforcement agencies as they conducted unannounced night time "sweeps" on known gang
members currently on probation. Because gang members associate regularly, the task force
also sought out offenders not necessarily on probation but with outstanding warrants. During
one sweep, two such persons were spotted by the task force and promptly arrested.
hi addition to the ride-alongs, the Grand Jury was offered the opportunity to talk to current
and ex -gang members from the streets of Marin and in San Quentin prison. The ground rules
for talking to gang members stipulated that they would help us understand gang life from
their vantage point but would not divulge anything about their associates or specific criminal
activity. That way their shared information did not qualify them as "snitches" nor did the
Grand Jury place itself in a position of having knowledge we could not, by virtue of our oath
of secrecy, pass on to the proper authorities.
This ability to gain insights from gang members themselves was a crucial turning point for
the investigation. It afforded us an opportunity to have current gang members articulate the
what and the how, but mostly, the why, of their involvement in gang activities - specifically
local gang activities directly affecting Marin. Their personal views of gang life are cited
liberally throughout this report.
It should be noted that although the Mafia, Hells Angels and Zeta organizations qualify as
gangs under California Penal Code 186.22, they were specifically omitted from this
investigation because each of those enterprises would warrant a separate investigation and
also because their presence in Marin was described by local law enforcement and Homeland
Security as "negligible."
DISCUSSION
Overlanpine Marins
To expand on the report sub -title "A Tale of Two Counties," imagine if you will that Marin is
actually two separate counties. Each county has its own unique society complete with its
own societal norms, but the two societies live in the same geographic area. One county is
populated with law-abiding citizens and the other county with gang members. Most of the
time, members of each county live in their own insulated worlds. Marin citizens reported
that they see the occasional graffiti and view news reports of gang activities but, in general,
the issue is well outside the confines of their normal lives and therefore off their daily radar.
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 4 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
While it is true that the two counties tend to keep to themselves, in the last year Court records
and law enforcement personnel, combined with local news reports, indicate the two counties
are interacting more regularly.
This analogy of the two counties was a direct result of our discussions with gang members.
They were the ones who postulated the presence of an alternate Marin. They took delight in
the fact that they see us, but we tend not to see them. They were amused to call our attention
to the fact that citizens of Marin who eat in restaurants, have their landscapes groomed, cars
washed or repaired, or take local buses, have most assuredly rubbed shoulders with bona fide
gang members. This is not at all odd when you consider that having a legitimate full-time job
is one of many stipulations of an offender's conditions of probation.
Additionally, places where children play or people shop during the day can, and sometimes
do, become combat sites at night. Hotel restaurants that host relaxed social events for
Marinites have occasionally found their parking lots to be the scene of vicious gang fights.
County Fairs and similar outdoor gatherings provide venues where citizens are virtually
guaranteed to be in the midst of current gang members. These people are from different
gangs and those gangs are sworn enemies.
The Marin Independent Journal reported that on May 22, 2010, commuters at our local transit
center witnessed an extreme case of the two counties overlapping when two suspects argued
in a bank parking lot across from the San Rafael Transit Center and then opened fire on each
other. Gangs have no respect for each other and certainly not for innocent people who find
themselves in the wrong place at the wrong time. Gangs may agree to occasional truces, but
they are in a constant state of war.
In some ways, our county's student population may be more aware of the presence of the two
counties than their parents. Several officers said that they have recently investigated more
violent crimes and noted a marked increase of known gang members frequenting the College
of Marin campus than any other time in the past. They recommended that the Grand Jury
visit high school campuses at noon to see how individual gangs claim their private turf to eat
their lunches.
So what is a eanj!?
It came as no surprise that a few of the people we spoke with denied there were gangs in
Marin. Some just do not want to acknowledge their existence. Still others fear they might
jeopardize the status quo or possibly bring into question the success of their community
programs. Certainly local merchants fear the potential loss of business if shoppers feel
unsafe in local malls.
More frequently, citizens get bogged down in semantic arguments claiming that, by
definition, the Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts and Grandma's sewing circle are technically gangs.
Still others denigrate the issue by saying that these are just kids who have known each other a
long time and that they just like to "hang and have fun together singing and dancing."
During a recent periodically held community forum aimed at educating parents and teachers
on gang indicia, (specific actions or indicators that the person is a gang member) a number of
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 5 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
pictures were shown that were taken directly from current gang websites of these local, "non-
existent" gang members. They proudly portrayed themselves sporting their gang tattoos,
hand signs and guns. One picture showed a number of gang members brazenly seated on the
steps in front of Mission San Rafael. Note of caution: the police who gathered the
pictures warned that most of the gang websites they visited were infected with identity -
robbing trojans or viruses.
A generic definition of a street gang4 is a group of people who form an allegiance for a
common purpose, who engage in criminal activity, and who conform to one or more of the
following traits:
• Share a common group name, symbols, tattoos, graffiti and a common style of dress
• Frequently congregate in, or lay claim to, a specific geographic area
• Associate together on a regular or continuous basis
The key concept here is that to qualify as gang members, people must engage in criminal
activity that furthers the illegal goals of their criminal enterprise.
Insillhts from the second Marin
A word of caution is required before reading the following narrative. The information
presented has been derived directly from present and "former" gang members. It is a
compilation of their personal views of life in general and gang life specifically. Its value lies
in providing a deeper understanding of gang life from a vantage point few are privy to
witness. With that context in mind, it would be a grave error to misuse this information to
broad -brush any specific group, race or creed or even any individual gang member. Some of
the material is difficult to fathom but has been included here to provide the reader a more
thorough understanding of the (gang) life and of the criminal mentality inherent in all gang
related activities,
The largest gangs in Marin presently are the Nortefios and the Surenos. Although the
Norteflos tend to be more hierarchical than the Surenos, neither gang has the strict codes nor
the military -like structure we have come to expect in criminal enterprises like the Mafia.
Marin's smaller gangs include the Young Hawgz, KUMI-415, Aryan Brotherhood, Crips,
Bloods, Mexican Mafia, Mara Salvatrucha-13 and Zetas. There are reportedly more but these
are the most commonly known and/or active.
It is important to note that if one reviews the ethnic composition of the local gangs listed
above, one will find they encompass a cross section of different races. The 2010-2011 Grand
Jury concluded that gang issues are not about race, creed, color or national origin... they are
about criminality.
The hierarchical structure of gangs is relatively flat. There are "shot -callers" at the top and
beneath them "generals" who run local turfs. All the rest are "soldiers." The top two tiers
4 lrttp:i/ ter +.gangsorus.convdefinition.htnil
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 6 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN; A Tale of Two Counties
demand "tax" or tribute payments from the soldiers. As a rule, the gang's most respected
leaders also tend to be the most violent.
Gangs meet regularly to discuss criminal activities and to pay their "taxes." This money
perpetuates gang activities and pays off members higher up.
In California, the topmost gang kingpins are career criminals and therefore are generally to
be found in our prisons. This was of special interest since San Quentin lies within Marin's
borders. The word from San Quentin staff is that the highest gang members in our local
Prison would only qualify as "middle management." The best-known hard-core shot callers
are presently incarcerated in maximum -security prisons such as Corcoran and Pelican Bay.
Our democratic rights of citizenship, coupled with criminal creativity allow incarcerated gang
members to maintain effective gang control from the relative safety of their cells. Common
prison methodologies include mail drops, three way correspondence, illegal cell phones and
cleverly encoded mail. Gang leaders also communicate to the outside through less -than -
ethical lawyers, complicit staff, visiting family members and "good soldiers" as they pass in
and out of the prison system. They also use selected clergy and their inherent liturgical rights
of secrecy. Legal ordination documentation can be purchased for $25 on the Internet.
Running a gang from prison is complicated. For obvious reasons, shot -callers must keep
meticulous records of their transactions and their "books" are held by the lesser soldiers on
small paper sheets called "kites." These kites are written in extremely small characters to
save space and are secreted in the anal cavities of the newly incarcerated. Such notes can
carry any genre of information such as encoded names of current members along with their
street names. Notes or records can identify areas of cities and which gangs control those
territories. Some kites carry the BNL (Bad News List) which details the names of people
who have to die for any number of gang related offenses. Such intelligence is invaluable to
law enforcement and there is a constant cat -and -mouse game in prisons to hide or find such
data.
Grand Jury efforts to quantify the metrics of gang sizes failed even when talking to the gangs
themselves. Local gang members were unsure (or unwilling) to guess the actual sizes of the
various local gangs. Clearly gang members do not register anywhere. Additionally, there are
large numbers of wannabes who "hang" with the gang from time to time. Wannabes can be
people who ultimately become gang members but most use their affiliation to build local
reputations but never pursue advancing thein qualification for actual membership. Besides
resident gang members, there are also those members who come and go frequently depending
on how welcome they are to the gang and whether they are known or wanted for a recent
crime. Recently, five wannabes committed thirty armed robberies in southern Marin. Their
main intent, aside from monetary gain, is to increase their status with their gang and thus rise
in the ranks.
The question of missing metrics perplexed us, but the experts told us a number of real-world
factors come into play everywhere that gangs exist, not just in Marin. Apparently, gang
crimes are frequently not recognized as such unless the perpetrators are multi -offenders or
known to local law enforcement. There are some issues as to how consistent individual
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 7 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
officers might be in assessing gang crime from other crime sources in the heat of the arrest,
Plea-bargained cases can sometimes blur "gang" status to achieve agreeable terms. While
these technical issues are factors, they are minor compared to the most significant factor in
underreporting gang crime and that is because gangs thrive in an atmosphere of intimidation,
fear, and retaliation. In some areas of the County, people who report gang crimes are very
likely to be victimized twice - once for the crime and once again for reporting it.
Another mitigating factor is that gang crime is predominantly committed against other gang
members. Police officers reported that in almost every case, gang -on -gang victims refused to
name their attackers with comments like: "don't worry about it, it will be handled." More
than one local gang member we interviewed mentioned their amazement at the extensive
number of crimes they personally knew about (or participated in) that never appeared in a
local newspaper.
Gangs have proven themselves to be creative and adaptive. When a local school gang
wanted to display a show of force, they knew they could not come to school wearing their
gang "colors" so they ordered their members to all show up in the same white shirts and black
pants. Gang members who have been deported but are determined to continue their business
in the United States have created halfway houses across the borders. From these sanctuaries,
they can and frequently do return to their point of deportation. Local authorities told of one
known local gang leader who returned to Marin in less than 2 weeks.
Most states have chosen to deal with criminal gangs by creating laws that automatically add
on incarceration time if the convicted person is a proven gang member,5 This practice is
consistent with a well-known axiom among law enforcement and correctional officers that a
small number of the worst offenders commit a majority of the crimes. This is sometimes
referred to as the 8% problem. One recent study by the Probation department in Orange
County found that 8% of young criminals committed 55% of the crimes.6
The only drawback is the add-on law effectively requires prosecutors to prosecute a gang
member twice: once for the specific crime and once again to prove the offender's
applicability for the add-on sentencing. Although it is an excellent idea in the abstract, in the
real world it is frequently brought to its knees by practical issues of DA staffing and
caseloads, added burdens of proof for police, and demanding court schedules. Note: Based
on this investigation, the Grand Jury fully supports and encourages the use of the add-on law
every time it is applicable.
When asked what kind of gang crime occurs locally we were told by gang members that the
vast majority of gang crimes are actually retaliation for a previous act and against a rival
gang. Crimes against the general population are not generally planned except possibly for
home invasions. Home invasions are not specifically to steal "things" in the house but rather
for the drugs that the gang knows are being grown or stored in the residence. In general,
5 Specific requirements to qualify for "add-on" time are defined fully in the California Penal Code Section 186.22.
6 http:liwNvw.ocgov.00m/ocgov/Probition/8%20Percent%,20Solutionl8%20Percenfio20Problem4�20Study%,2oMethodology Note: to use this
URL, copy or paste into your browser window.
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 8 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
most local crime is property crime committed against targets of opportunity. Such targets
would include for example, single bus riders at bus stops or people walking alone at night.
An especially viable target is anyone who does not use banks and is suspected by the gangs
to be carrying large amounts of cash on their person. Police corroborated this assessment and
further characterized our local gangs as sharks that move about and eat any time they are
hungry.
hl addition, stealing cars is currently profitable. Not only are the cars resalable, but also they
can be "chopped" into parts and the pieces sold for more than the car is worth. There is also
a large stolen car market overseas and in Central and South America. The hottest new
market is for the precious metals found in catalytic converters.
According to gang members and County officials, crystal meth (methamphetamine) is
presently Marin's illegal drug of choice with the misuse of prescription drugs like Oxycontin
vying hard for first place. We were told that meth cooks have progressed technically from
needing a large, well-equipped laboratory to something small enough to fit into a van. Gang
members lamented the fact that the misuse of prescription drugs is cutting into their profits.
Prescription drugs are easier to get, cheaper, and generally do not arouse suspicion.
A more recent enterprise is ID theft. Gangs steal mail for any personal information that it
might contain. There are criminal clearinghouses that buy personal mail for $1.00 per piece.
The why - it's a matter of anger
Most of our gang member interviews started with the question "why." Although one would
expect a variety of answers, there emerged one consistent theme that included the word
"angry." It was very significant that they talked about being angry almost all the time and
that all of their friends are angry people, This is consistent with what the sociologists and
psychologists tell us when they say root' causes of joining gangs include the following;
• Anger toward missing or abusive parents
• Anger at being victimized by "the system"
• Anger at the absence of security, structure and discipline in their lives
• Anger at finding no support from family, friends or society in general
• Anger at having no idea where they belong, who they are, or what they could be
• Anger at being left unprotected by people they trusted
• Anger at having no money and no respect
• Anger at being forced into a gang by the community and circumstances
• Anger at families whose current gang affiliations left them no other options
The primary list came from the selected sites on the Internet but we added the concept of
"anger" to add emphasis based on the insights we received from gang members we
7 http:/�N'X"w.co.middlesex.nj.us.-prosecutor MOI9 E_docs/Gang°/.20Awareness%20 &'7o20Prevention"/o20-
%20Guidee/,20for°G2OParents'b20&04,20'reactiers.pdi' Note: to use this reference, it must be pasted or written directly into your browser search
window.
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 9 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN; A Tale of Two Counties
interviewed. The consistency of the anger comments went a long way in helping us
understand why a gang member could so easily beat, shoot or stab scuneone for innocently
committing what would seem to most people to be a minor affront. A notable quote came
from an ex -gang member when he told CNN News that "Gangs are the language of those
who have lost hope."
Gang fodder is everywhere
No gang investigation would be complete if we did not ask gang members what personally
led each of them into the gang life. For some of the people, gang affiliation almost seemed
pre -destined and a natural progression of their early lives. This group talked of being on
Marin streets hungry and cold at a time in their lives when they were too young to understand
why so many others had what they did not have. Their natural response to that was "anger."
Introduce gangs into that scenario with offers to provide them with all the things they are
missing, and even a hardened skeptic would have a hard time assuring this subset of kids that
their gang affiliation was wholly a choice.
We heard of gang members who are the offspring of two or three generations of gang
members. These people are strongly encouraged by parents and siblings to carry on the
family business and simultaneously discouraged from seeking alternate options.
Still others said they had fallen victim to what they referred to as "the system" long before
gang affiliation was a foreseeable option. As a result of the "sins of the parents" and
circumstances beyond their control, these children ended up separated from their siblings and
placed in what they referred to as "badly managed" or "physically abusive" foster or group
homes in Marin and elsewhere. That lack of quality and control in their lives spawned their
anger and initiated a pattern of running away and living on the street. For many street
dwellers, the only group that offered them a better option was the gang. While the first
Marin County might not make the same choices, the camaraderie, fellowship, mutual
lifestyles and feeling of belonging offered by the gang offset the violence and loneliness of
flying solo.
We were told of a third source of gang fodder - Juvenile Hall. An early investigation of
"Juvie" by the present Grand Jury revealed a well-run facility. That stipulated, it was
reported to the Grand Jury that the social patterns of the exercise yard forced the newly
incarcerated to quickly choose an affiliation or "clique." Clique affiliation offered safe
passage through their incarceration and rejection of a clique came with the threat of isolation
or abuse. Of course, affiliation came with the mandatory hatred and anger toward the other
residents and especially the other cliques. Incarceration also offered time to learn or hone
their criminal skills, thus perpetuating a form of state -funded "high school of crime."
One might wonder about the inconsistency of saying Juvenile Hall is well run and then
seemingly contradicting that statement by discussing how gang affiliation can flourish there.
As with all institutions of incarceration - juvenile or adult - no amount of staff can watch
everyone all of the time. In San Quentin, the prisoners take pride in saying that the officers
run the prison as long as the prisoners are willing to let them. That is not really true but does
point out that, like "A Tale of Two Counties," prisons sustain two separate lifestyles - even
under the ever -vigilant and watchful eyes of the staff.
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 10 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
It is important to note that even those gang members who were the most uncomplimentary of
Juvenile Hall were supportive of the "healing circles" and other psychological help they got
at the "Hall." They said that for most of them it was the first and only time they had the
opportunity and professional direction to stop long enough to evaluate and assess their lives.
They were not as complimentary of the schooling provided, but conceded that many Juvenile
Hall incarcerations are measured in days or weeks and that did not give them much time or
incentive to seriously consider a long-term curriculum or direction. The Grand Jury supports
providing all the mental health services the budget will bear.
There are two other potential sources of gang recruits that do not necessarily fit the
traditional model:
• Some of the trained counselors we interviewed mentioned that some percentage of
gang members are "sociopaths,"' While this group does not inherently fit into the
"angry" category, they certainly qualify as dangerous people. In gangs, the
combination of sociopaths and cadres of angry people makes for an unstable mixture.
Probation officers talked of a second non-traditional source. That is the anomalous
handful of kids who come from prosperous homes, many times with one or even two
loving parents. When asked why well-to-do kids might join gangs, it could only be
speculated that the causes are generally boredom or a need for excitement. One
person said, "if it's a girl, however, the issue is almost always `love'." That
observation was followed up with a tilt of the head and the overly macho comment:
"Girls really go for the bad boys, you know."
Gang victimization is an equal opportunity attribute
The literature, and most officers, affirmed the theory that gangs serve as a replacement for
the missing family unit and provide their members the safe haven they did not find at home.
Maybe that is why it seemed inconsistent to learn from our interviews that gangs can and do
victimize their members just as much as they victimize people outside the gangs.
When wannabes become qualified candidates, they swear oaths of allegiance and state a
willingness to die for their gang. In spite of this intense commitment, gangs have no qualms
ordering members to kill or be killed, or to commit acts that are guaranteed to get them shot
or, at best, incarcerated. When a member is hospitalized as a result of gang involvement or
becomes incarcerated, outside gang support drops to nothing. When asked why, one young
person shrugged and said: "Gang members cannot be seen associating with that person
anymore... I guess that's just the way it is." We noted that the same denial comment of
"that's just the way it is" was the frequent response to many questions for which there was no
defensible answer.
8 Sociopath: the personality disorder characterized by an abnormal lack of empathy combined with strongly amoral conduct but masked by an
ability to appear outwardly normal.
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 11 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
When asked about dreams and aspirations, some of the gang members interviewed
acknowledged that they would like to live a "normal" life. They define normal as having
someone who cares for them, a family, children, a safe place to live and perhaps even pets.
They would like to have a good job and the ability to feel safe walking the streets. During
interviews the body language was decidedly more open and hopeful when these topics were
broached, but universally ended with a shrug, physical withdrawal, tightening of facial
muscles and the verbal acceptance that none of that was ever likely to happen. Gang culture
is the antithesis of that life. Two people even said during their interviews, "I love the family
life but when the gang calls, I'M THERE!"
Even when the gang sees that someone wants or even tries to make a transition, the shot -
callers call them to action knowing that their fellow gang members will leave whatever they
were doing in at a moment's notice and fall in line as good soldiers. One person said his/her
more realistic future "was not house and family - it was prison or street execution."
It amazed us all how easily gang members were able to completely compartmentalize their
lives. They can be living lives we might all consider "normal" in one Marin and then shift
instantly into committing horrific acts of violence in the alternate Marin. During the Marin
gang sweeps it was not at all uncommon to find extensive religious relics on the front walls
and huge gang -murals in the back rooms of the same residence.
How? The recruitment process
When asked if it was difficult to recruit new gang members, the universal response was
laughter. Gangs recruit kids as young as twelve. Several of our interviewees suggested that
if Marin really wants to redirect kids away from gangs, they should start anti -gang education
as early as eight years of age.
Kids are willing and eager recruits. The lure of money, power and respect in a world where
they have none of these is irresistible. These kids are called "wannabes" or "pee wees" and
they are highly sought after to commit minor crimes, carry and hide guns, transport drugs and
sometimes even kill for the gang.
Young people are already conditioned by heroes they idolize, movies they see, music they
listen to, and video games they play. They are predisposed to believe gang life will be
enticing, exciting, and lucrative. At that age, they also see themselves as immortal. Graffiti
touts gang activity on public walls and sows its venom of hate and intimidation. One
wonders if rap artists and other celebrities know when they flash their oh -so -cool hand signs
on the news or award programs just how much damage they are doing to these young kids
who look up to them as role models.
To provide perspective on the lure of juvenile crime, several police officers testified that they
arrest middle school students routinely who are making $2000 a week and sometimes even
more selling drugs. Multiple sources confirmed that one local probationer was arrested with
$17,000 in cash.
A member of the Public Defender's office with firsthand knowledge told us that gangs are
partial to the use of minors because they know when minors are caught, the courts will treat
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 12 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN; A Tale of Two Counties
them with kid gloves and they will be back on the street before the ink dries on their arrest
reports. Apparently the only downside to gangs who use kids is that "they tend to brag about
their exploits" and are more than willing to trade information for leniency. Knowing that, the
gangs have to be cautious and censor what the pee wees are allowed to know.
When an associate or wannabe decides he wants to advance in the organization, he tells the
gang and is assigned specific "work" to do for the gang. "Work" means criminal activity of
any sort. There is even a popular rap song called: "Putting in Work." At some point when
the candidate has earned sufficient respect through successful criminal activity, the shot -
callers will determine that he is ready to be a member. The candidate then goes through an
extended period where the gang further tests his commitment to them. When the gang is
satisfied that the candidate is a willing and capable "soldier," they jump him in. This
equates to taking a beating from a handful of fellow gang members for a specified amount of
time. Gangs appear to put a lot of energy into symbolism so if one belongs to the
"Eighteenth Street" contingent of a local gang, for example, they are likely to inflict an
eighteen -second beating.
These beatings were eagerly discussed with obvious pride. If one made an enemy or two in
the gang the beating might be more severe, but otherwise, "they weren't that bad." Clearly
being bludgeoned, shot, stabbed or maimed was an "expected part of the lifestyle." Each
candidate was mentally conditioned to "take it like a good soldier." Beyond that, every
wound enhances a soldier's status with the other members.
Women are allowed to be members in a few gangs. Several officers of the court lamented
that they are seeing increased participation by women. The driver of the Safeway shooting
drive-by car was female. For women, jumping -in can require them to do "work" for the
group but more often it entails them sleeping with every member of the gang. This is
referred to as being "sexed -in."
Rules and Reis?
All organizations need to have some sort of rules to survive and street gangs are no different.
Some groups accept multiple races into membership while still others limit membership to
one race. Rules might specify that families of gang members are off limits for retaliation, or
that rapists and child molesters must be killed. For some it is against the rules to kill
innocent people when carrying out gang -to -gang mayhem. Failure to keep the rules results in
having to pay a tax. "Taxing" in this case means taking a beating or even being killed if the
offense is deemed sufficiently unacceptable.
It is against the rules of every gang to tattle or squeal. One local gang has tattoos saying,
"ANT" which stands for "Ain't No Talkin." People who "rat out" other gang members are
generally dealt with severely. In some Marin communities this rule holds for the entire
population, and people who talk with the police can be beaten, have their homes vandalized,
or sometimes they are even killed.
One case reported to us by law enforcement and the Public Defender's office told of a man
who was stabbed in his doorway on a very public street at 1:00 o'clock (lunchtime) but
nobody in the neighborhood reported it. The body was not discovered until 5:30 that night.
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 13 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
Paramedics said the man bled out and could have been saved if they had arrived just a few
hours sooner. ANT!
"ANT" notwithstanding, "intel" (street language for intelligence or information) from gang
members about other gang members is a way of life. Although it frequently accompanies
plea deals, in many other cases it stems from jealousy or fear. Sometimes it is a judicious
means for having the police deal with something they cannot or do not want to deal with
themselves.
Since squealing is unforgivable, gang members are often accused of ratting out the gang and
they must then produce their "papers" to prove themselves innocent of the charges. The
"papers" in question refer to the arrest documents created as part of the arrest procedures.
State law requires giving these papers to offenders. The documents are acceptable proof of
"innocence" to other gang members if they do not detail, or in any way lead the reader to
believe, that the offender was offered a deal as a result of turning on another gang member.
The same papers can be used to prove "guilt" in which case the offender will have to pay the
tax with money, a beating, or his life.
Body tattoos are a significant expression of gang life. Tattoos are badges of honor designed
to instill fear in the beholders but also to articulate tales of gang membership, criminal
exploits and details about their enemies. If a gang member has gang related tattoos (e.g. MS -
13, ANT, X3, etc.) on the neck, head or the face, one can be assured they are top echelon
soldiers, generals or even shot -callers. In prison, a tear below one eye usually denotes the
owner has killed for the gang.
Gang members need permission to add a tattoo when they have successfully done "work" for
the gang. If someone has a "tat" that has not been sanctioned, the standard practice;
according to our gang members; is to remove it with a blowtorch or flay off the offending
skin. We can safely assume that citizens of the first Marin are appalled by the image that
conjures up, and confused as to why anyone would risk that much pain for a symbolic act.
There are at least two answers to that question and both serve to clarify gang mentality. The
first possibility is that whether or not it is true, the threat alone is sufficient to inhibit
unsanctioned tattoos for most people. Secondly, symbolic or not, gang tattoos are a sign of
power and respect in the second Marin. The kids who risk unauthorized tattoos never
intended to show a gang member their illegal tattoo(s), just their close friends and girlfriends.
The whole process demonstrates a mentality of "invincibility." It also demonstrates an
inherent confusion regarding cause and effect. There seems to be little or no link between
taking an action and then receiving some sort of consequence for that action.
Marin - "Jewel of the North Bay"
While gang members downplayed the extent of local -grown gang crime, they were quick to
point out that Marin is the jewel of the North Bay, surrounded on three sides by cities with
extreme gang activity. One gang member went so far as to describe Marin as a "tasty morsel,
ripe for the taking."
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 14 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
To illustrate this, two police officers told of arresting out -of county gang members caught
stealing money and electronic goods from Marinites at the San Rafael Transit Center. They
told the officers they committed their crimes there because Marin people do not fight back.
One young man said that if he tried to do the same thing in Richmond or even Santa Rosa, he
would most likely be shot or stabbed by his victim. Another young man from Marin City
said he could not even do crime in Marin City because all the sheriffs there know him by
sight.
The same people who estimated Marin gang members in the hundreds estimated up to a
thousand in Richmond and somewhere around four thousand in Santa Rosa. That does not
begin to account for other proximate gang regions like Vallejo, Napa, and Oakland. Even as
this document was being written, there were daily reports of a major gang war in the Mission
district of San Francisco. The same insiders speculated from their sources that MS -13 and
the Mexican Mafia may have their sights on local expansion.
What exempts Marin?
Tasty morsel or not, Mardi is still highly sheltered from gang activity. The naysayers are
wrong - we do have small local gangs and huge nearby gangs but they are not terribly
successful in this county. To be sure, gang crime is rising and must be watched, but it is
presently under control thanks to the efforts of professionals who fully comprehend the
consequences of ignoring the issue.
When law enforcement personnel and officers of the court were asked to speculate why
Marin has kept itself relatively free of gangs, they offered a number of plausible theories
based on their career experiences in Marin.
First, Marin is an expensive place to live and the majority of people who live here tend to
protect their lifestyle. It is also a beautiful place and people tend to move here because they
appreciate that beauty. A corollary to the theory is that people tend to take better care of nice
things than they do of broken things. If you take a new car for repair, the mechanic will
drape a cover over the fender before working on the engine. If it is an old car, he/she will
not.
Perhaps a more logistical reason might be that Marin has one main highway running through
the center of the County and only four highway routes in -and -out of the County - all of which
could be closed by the police if the crime warranted. This has never happened but just
knowing it could is a strong deterrent.
WalkinE the talk
Various sections of this discussion have alluded to the fact that Marin "Walks their Talk." It
is true that the prevailing attitude among a cross section of experts interviewed was doubt
that gangs will ever be eradicated in our time. Nevertheless, in Marin, that philosophical
point is offset by the sustained mutual efforts of law enforcement, government, community
and professional organizations. Their activities have and continue to go far in keeping young
people's interest away from gangs. The following is a representative list of quality programs
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 15 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
in Marin County that have a proven track record for diminishing gang activity while
effectively re -focusing our kids' interest toward more positive pursuits.
Nighttime 2an2 sweeps
One tool worthy of extensive review is the nighttime gang sweep. This effective tool is used
by law enforcement in many communities. It consists of periodic and unannounced evening
visits at the residences of gang members. Its intent is to maintain a constant presence in the
lives of gang -related youth of Marin who are on probation, or under house arrest.
Briefings start the evenings' activities and are often attended by the top members of County
enforcement departments. They are there to supply the latest information and statistics
available and to offer words of encouragement, support, and commendations to the officers in
attendance. Almost universally some variation of the words, "be safe out there" accompany
each briefing.
Probationers have contracts with the courts that allow probation officers free access to their
personal spaces without the requirement for a search warrant. This is known in the trade as
"waiving their Fourth Amendment rights." These contracts enable law enforcement to look
for signs of active gang affiliation or gang indicia such as excessive cash or expensive
objects, firearms, needles, drugs and drug paraphernalia. Known gang turf can be defined as
off -limit areas for the probationers and these areas are checked periodically to be sure
probationers are in compliance with their "stay away" orders.
If there is sufficient suspicion, a roving K9 team is available on these sweeps for more
specific investigation. Another roving backup team carries a device that can read and copy
the telephone numbers from a cellular phone. This is extremely valuable in checking the
offender's frequently called list. This data can provide names and numbers of other gang
members or burgeoning wannabes.
In addition to specific violations, the sweeps provide valuable information to law officers and
the probation department that they could never acquire in any other way. They also keep
gang members more law abiding when they realize their probation can be terminated at any
time for violating the conditions of their probation grant. Probation contracts do call for
periodic office visits but a few minutes of good behavior hardly provides probation officers
with accurate information as to how the probationer is really living.
Once again, the Grand Jury thanks the many members of law enforcement who took the extra
time to accommodate our presence on these sweeps and explain every action that was being
taken. Our attendance afforded us a unique opportunity to see gang members on their home
ground and to view firsthand the relationships between law enforcement and offenders. It
showed the County's commitment to keeping gang activity in check in a way no amount of
interviewing could have achieved.
The normal entry process entailed two armed law enforcement officers knocking and then
making entry. When they cleared the house or apartment and declared it safe, they would
then bring in the probation officers to conduct the actual search and adjudicate any issues. At
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 16 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
this writing, probation officers in Marin are unarmed. A 2008 Grand Jury report titled
"Probation Officers: Arming for Safety" recommended arming probation officers and the
County is reportedly working with the Probation Department to implement such a plan.
Probation officers would validate the presence of the offender and check his/her personal
space and all public spaces in the area. This means that kitchens and bathrooms were fair
game but another family member's quarters would be off-limits. Houses we saw ran the
normal gamut from clean to filthy. In some, the rooms were spotless and even the clothes
were folded with military precision. Officers said this generally meant that the person had
been in prison because folding clothes is a mandatory requirement of prison life.
The condition of the homes or apartments raided reflected the same cross section as any
community. One apartment floor was covered with dog feces and another had mold -
encrusted walls. Still others had expensive luxury items such as a 60 -inch projection
television with surround sound or a $2,000 bicycle.
Clearly, one has to know what one is looking for during these sweeps. Several residences
had pellet guns. While they are not against the law, they can still cause serious injury and are
easily mistaken for the real thing. There were also an inordinate number of Phillips -head
screwdrivers found. To the citizens of the first Marin these tools represent no cause for alarm
but Phillips -head screwdrivers are an excellent weapon of choice. They can be lethal but
their presence engenders little to no suspicion.
Additional insights came from watching the interaction between the offenders and law
enforcement or probation. The code of the day was to start each interaction with respect and
deference. That demeanor prevailed as long as it was mutual. Reception to the sweeps
varied widely. In some places officers encountered quiet acceptance while in others it was
out and out shouting and hostility. In some homes the task force members were offered
coffee and shelter from the cold night, while in other places the residents ran away shouting
"five oh" or greeted the cops by throwing beer bottles and carving gang signs into their car
doors. Families of the offender were treated well, usually with apologies for disrupting their
evening. The searches were thorough and focused based on extensive relationships and
knowledge that probation officers had with each offender.
It was made crystal clear that these sweeps are not witch-hunts. Minor infractions such as the
presence of blue or red clothing (symbols of Surenos or Nortenos) were frequently
overlooked and addressed with a short lecture instead of re -incarceration. The teams were
looking for serious offenses and information; there was no imperative to bring anyone back
for minor violations of parole. It became evident, and was later corroborated by gang
members themselves, that they frequently build strong and supportive relationships with their
probation officers. There is no question that there is an obvious adversarial position, but
even that is accepted with a large measure of respect. The point of the sweeps is not to flaunt
authority but rather to keep offenders off guard and, when possible, help them modify their
previous life path.
On the sweeps we attended, temporary teams were formed with representatives from multiple
jurisdictions and frequently the team members met for the first tune at the briefing. We
learned from our interviews that officers who work with each other regularly know they can
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 17 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
trust what their partner will do in any given situation. That knowledge does not exist in the
present format of sweep activity, making it slightly more dangerous than it has to be.
A lack of coordination between teams also led to occasional overlaps and wasted time. On at
least two occasions, multiple teams arrived at the same apartment complex at the same time,
exacerbating the anxiety of residents who were not involved in any wrongdoing but whose
parking lots were now doubly inundated in swat uniforms and police cars.
Through interviews and watching the sweeps, it became clear that there is no universal gang
database in use in the County. While there are a number of local databases (e.g. Cal Gangs)
only a few of them are shared, and there is no single source of information used by all
County enforcement personnel. This not only duplicates efforts and increases costs, but it
limits sharing of critical information that could be useful to all local agencies. The Grand
Jury believes that there should be a single database of gang information that is shared by all
local agencies.
The Phoenix Proiect
A prominent anti -gang program in Marin City was created in July 2009, and named "The
Phoenix Project of Marin - A Community Connections Center." Its aim is to assist juveniles
in getting their lives in order. They specialize in working with juveniles who have been in
jail and/or are on probation or have been involved in minor crimes. An information and
assessment sheet is completed for each youth as to their past family and criminal history and
a determination made as to what they need to start on a more effective lifestyle. It has been
so successful that a preliminary report shows area crime statistics decreased forty-two percent
in the first six months after the program started.9
The Canal Alliance
Incorporated in 1982, Canal Alliance is a comprehensive community resource center that
develops self-sufficiency and leadership in Marin's low-income, immigrant populations
through access to health and social services, youth development, economic security, and
citizenship. They work with youth from their early years through College. They presently
have 80 middle schools students and 80 high school students; (mostly from Mexico and
Guatemala) who come to study after school (3:00pm to 6:00pm). Their founding philosophy
is that if they can engage families, provide education, offer foundations for self-sufficiency,
and alternate lifestyles, they negate the draw toward gangs. Their kids tell them they like
going to the Alliance because "it is a safe environment, unlike their streets."
The Martin Luther Kine Jr. Academy
In an effort to boost student performance, the Martin Luther King Jr. Academy in Marin City
has extended the school day to 6 p.m. four days a week. The ten-hour school day is the first
of its kind in Marin and attendance is mandatory for the school's forty-five students. The
9 7Kid=7514311
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 18 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
program includes math, English and science instruction in addition to sports, current events,
college preparation, life skills and electives such as fashion design, cooling and sewing.
We were told by multiple sources that the hours between school closure and parents arriving
home are the most dangerous time for students to be idle and the time when they are at the
most risk of committing crime. Although the MLK Academy extended day program is
primarily aimed at increasing student success, a secondary benefit is filling student's time
with worthwhile and interesting pursuits, thus diminishing the time some students previously
used for developing gang interests. 10
The Marin County Office of Education
The Marin County Office of Education periodically sponsors gang -awareness and
identification workshops for teachers and parents. Speakers from the Sheriffs office, Novato
and San Rafael Police, and Probation Department present all aspects of gang life as well as
the extent of gang activity in the local venue. They also instruct parents on how to spot
indications of gang interest in their own children. Other local school boards do the same
commensurate with the gang problems recognized within their jurisdiction.
Restorative Justice
A tool that is finding its way into Marin schools, prisons and courts is called Restorative
Justice. The concept is in common use elsewhere around the globe and is presently a prime
methodology supporting the Jurisprudence system of New Zealand. Restorative Justice is the
umbrella term for a number of specific methods that focus on the needs of victims and
offenders as opposed to focusing on principles of law or the exacting of punishment. After
careful preparation by trained practitioners, offenders, and victims come together in an effort
to understand and deal with the issues of the offense in an effort to find closure for both
parties. Educators and practitioners we interviewed told of amazing successes in decreasing
recidivism rates and directing young offenders into more acceptable lifestyles.
Youth Court
There is a "diversionary" program in Marin, based on the principles of Restorative Justice
that provides youthful offenders with peer-to-peer review and adjudication of their offenses.
It has full legal standing with the courts and if peer -sentences are satisfied within 90 days, the
offender's record is expunged. If not, the case is remanded to the regular Juvenile Justice
system.
Youth court is financed by the YMCA and miscellaneous anti-crime grants. The judges are
volunteers. At this writing, there are 60 Youth Courts in California and 1000 in the United
States. The local director of the program reported that the recidivism rate for our Youth
Court is 8% as opposed to 26% in the regular juvenile courts. Of course, the severity of
crimes in Juvenile Court vs. Youth Court might skew those results, but clearly, the low risk
offenders are getting the message without messing up the remainder of their lives.
101tttp:/heww. marinij,con)/intirinnews/ci_17505372?IADID
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 19 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
FINDINGS
The Grand Jury finds that:
Fl. The County Probation Department plays a significant role in limiting local gang activity.
Their job functions afford them the extended time required to build relationships and trust
with their probationers.
F2. Marin has comparatively low resident gang activity but it is a tempting target and market
for the significant gangs residing in Santa Rosa, Napa, Vallejo, Richmond, Oakland and San
Francisco.
F3. Organizations that can keep youth busy during their leisure hours with extended
schooling or recreational activities may well decrease their interest in gang affiliation.
F4. Most gang crime is committed against other gangs or within the gangs themselves.
Crimes against citizens are typically serendipitous crimes of opportunity.
F5. While gang members are to be held responsible for choosing the gang life, several of
those we interviewed joined because they saw no other option available to them to "escape"
their violent, neglectful or impoverished environments.
F6. A number of gang members claimed they would "opt out" if they had the social and
economic opportunities and the support and encouragement to do so.
F7. The topmost gang leaders or shot -callers are incarcerated in our state prisons but they are
able to effectively direct their criminal enterprises from their cells.
F8. Nighttime gang sweeps are an effective, pro -active method for keeping gang
probationers in check while gaining valuable information that can be used to prevent
potential problems before they occur.
F9. Increased coordination and interdepartmental cooperation would ensure that gang
sweeps are safer and more efficient.
F10. There is presently no single gang -related database in use by all County enforcement
personnel.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Grand Jury recommends that:
Rl. Nighttime gang sweeps be continued, and The County Probation Chief, Chiefs of Police
from Novato and San Rafael, and the County Sheriff should collaborate to find ways to make
sweeps even more effective and safer by creating and maintaining consistent sweep teams.
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 20 of 21
GANGS OF MARIN: A Tale of Two Counties
R2, The Chiefs of Police of Novato and San Rafael, the County Sheriff and the County
Probation Chief evaluate existing gang databases, and choose, and install the most effective
option for regular use by all law enforcement personnel in Marin County by the end of 2011.
REQUEST FOR RESPONSES
Pursuant to Penal Code Section 933.05, the Grand Jury requests responses from the following
individuals:
• Novato City Council: RI, R2
• San Rafael City Council: RI, R2
• Marin County Sheriff: RI, R2
Governing bodies indicated above should be aware that the comment or response of the
governing body must be conducted in accordance with Penal Code Section 933 (c) and
subject to the notice, agenda and open meeting requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act.
California Penal Code Section 933 (c) states that "...the governing body of the public agency
shall comment to the presiding judge on the findings and recommendations pertaining to
matters under the control of the governing body." Further, the Ralph M. Brown Act requires
that any action of a public entity governing board occur only at a noticed and agendized
public meeting.
The Grand Jury invites responses from:
• Marin County Probation Department Chief
Reports issued by the Civil Grand Jury do not identify individuals interviewed. Penal Code Section 929 requires that
reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name of any person, or facts leading to the identity of any person who
provides information to the Civil Grand Jury. The California State Legislature has stated that it intends the provisions
of Penal Code Section 929 prohibiting disclosure of witness identities to encourage full candor in testimony in Civil
Grand Jury investigations by protecting the privacy and confidentiality of those who participate in any Civil Grand Jury
investigation,
May 18, 2011 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Page 21 of 21
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN RAFAEL APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
RESPONSE TO THE 2010-2011 MARIN COUNTY GRAND
JURY REPORT ENTITLED "GANGS OF MARIN: A TALE
OF TWO COUNTIES."
WHEREAS, pursuant to Penal Code section 933, a public agency which receives a Grand
July Report addressing aspects of the public agency's operations, must comment on the Report's
findings and recommendations contained in the Report in writing within ninety (90) days to the
Presiding Judge of the Superior Court with a copy to the Foreperson of the Grand Jury; and
WHEREAS, Penal Code section 933 specifically requires that the "governing body" of the
public agency provide said response and, in order to lawfully comply, the governing body must
consider and adopt the response at a noticed public meeting pursuant to the Brown Act; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Rafael has received and reviewed the
2010-2011 Marin County Grand Jury Report, dated May 18, 2011, entitled "Gangs of Marin: A
Tale of Two Counties" and has agendized it at this meeting for a response.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San
Rafael hereby:
1. Approves and authorizes the Mayor to execute the City of San Rafael's response to
the 2010-2011 Marin County Grand Jury Report entitled "Gangs of Marin: A Tale of Two
Counties", copy attached hereto.
2. Directs the City Cleric to forward the City's Grand Jury Report response to the
Presiding Judge of the Marin County Superior Court and to the Foreperson of the Marin County
Grand Jury.
I, Esther Beirne, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the San Rafael
City Council held on the , by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ESTHER C. BEIRNE, City Cleric
RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY REPORT FORM
Report Title: GANGS IN MARIN: A TALE OF TWO COUNTIES
Report Date: May 18, 2011
Response By: City Council of the City of San Rafael
Title: Mayor and City Council
FINDINGS:
• We agree with the findings numbered N/A
• We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered N/A
RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Recommendations numbered RI, R2 have been implemented.
(Attach a summary describing the implemented actions.) See Attachment A
incorporated herein.)
• Recommendations numbered N/A have not yet been implemented, but will be
implemented in the future.
(Attach a timeframe for the implementation.)
• Recommendations numbered N/A I requires further analysis.
• Recommendations numbered N/A will not be implemented because they are not
warranted or are not reasonable.
DATED:
ATTEST:
Esther Beirne, City Clerk-
Number
lerk
Number of pages attached: 1
Signed:
ALBERT J. BORO, Mayor
ATTACHMENT "A"
RESPONSE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL TO GRAND JURY REPORT
"GANGS IN MARIN: A TALE OF TWO COUNTIES"
Recommendations:
R1. Nighttime gang sweeps be continued, and The County Probation Chief, the
Chiefs of Police from Novato and San Rafael, and the County Sheriff should
collaborate to find ways to make sweeps even more effective and safer by
creating and maintaining consistent sweep teams.
Response: Has been implemented.
For the past seven years, gang sweeps have been conducted on a routine basis with
numerous law enforcement agencies in Marin including probation, parole, and
Department of Homeland Security. County wide gang meetings are held on a quarterly
basis which allows the agencies to build relationships and communicate effectively about
gang issues in the county. We maintain as much consistency as possible with our sweep
teams; however, all police officers at the San Rafael Police Department have the training
and experience to participate in a gang sweep safely and effectively.
R2. The Chiefs of Police of Novato and San Rafael, the County Sheriff and the
County Probation Chief evaluate existing gang databases, and choose, and
install the most effective option for regular use by all law enforcement
personnel in Marin County by the end of 2011.
Response: Has been implemented.
The San Rafael Police Department uses a database called "Cal -Gang" which can be
accessed by any law enforcement agency in the state. We have been using this database
for over ten years and currently have seven officers certified as operators in the Cal -Gang
system. This allows us to provide gang intelligence data and receive gang intelligence
data to all agencies in Marin as well as any other agency in the state. Since this database
has been in existence for such a long period of time and is used by the majority of law
enforcement agencies in the state, having a database specific to Marin County would not
meet the needs of our law enforcement officers. It would not provide intelligence
regarding adjoining counties and would be very limited in scope.