HomeMy WebLinkAboutRA Minutes 1997-03-03SRRA MINUTES (Regular) 3/3/97 Page 1
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, MONDAY, MARCH 3, 1997 AT 7:30
PM
Regular Meeting: Present: Albert J. Boro, Chairman
San Rafael Redevelopment Agency: Paul M. Cohen, Councilmember
Barbara Heller, Member
Gary Phillips, Member
Absent: Cyr N. Miller, Member
Also Present: Rod Gould, Executive Director
Gary T. Ragghianti, Agency Attorney
Jeanne M. Leoncini, Agency Secretary
CLOSED SESSION - 7:00 PM
None
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS OF AN URGENCY NATURE:
None
CONSENT CALENDAR:
7:30 PM
Member Cohen moved and Member Phillips seconded, to approve the following Consent
Calendar items:
ITEM
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of Approved as submitted.
Tuesday, February 18, 1997 (AS)
2. Unapproved Minutes of Citizens Advisory Accepted report.
Committee Meeting of Thursday,
February 6, 1997 (RA) - File R-140 IVB
3. Adoption of Resolution Accepting Proposal RESOLUTION NO. 97-5 -
from Republic Electric to Furnish San Rafael RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE
Style Street Lights for West End of Fourth PROPOSAL FROM REPUBLIC ELECTRIC
Street and Authorizing the Director of Economic TO PURCHASE SAN RAFAEL STYLE
Development to Execute Agreement (PW) STREET LIGHTS FOR THE
- File R-366 x R-140 XIII WEST END OF FOURTH STREET, AND
AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT IN
THE AMOUNT OF $160,140.
AYES: MEMBERS: Cohen, Heller, Phillips & Chairman Boro
NOES: MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Miller
AGENCY CONSIDERATION:
4. REPORT ON 1997 FARMERS MARKET FESTIVAL: (RA) - File R-309 x R-181
a. APPROVAL OF STREET CLOSURES, DATES AND HOURS OF OPERATION FOR 1997 MARKET
b. APPROVAL OF OPERATIONS CONTRACT WITH CELEBRATIONS FOR 1997 MARKET
C. APPROVAL OF $25,000 BUDGET ADVANCE FOR 1997 START-UP COSTS
Director of Economic Development Jake Ours reported the Farmer's Market was beginning
its eighth year, noting it has been a very successful Market. He pointed out
that last year a number of structural changes had been made in the Market,
in response to comments made about the operations. He noted that while some
of the changes had been good, some had been bad, as they resulted in less revenue
received by the Market due
SRRA MINUTES (Regular) 3/3/97 Page 1
SRRA MINUTES (Regular) 3/3/97 Page 2
to a decrease in the number of vendors. Mr. Ours stated during this year's Market
they would attempt to increase the number of vendors, but learn from past
experience and maintain the displays in an orderly fashion, and keep them good
looking. He noted they
would again include some of the non -craft type of vendors who had participated in
the past. Mr. Ours reported they would also be increasing the rates charged
to the vendors by $5 - $10 per night, except for the food vendors, who are
already charged the highest rates, and will remain at $55. per night.
In reviewing the past performance of the Market, Mr. Ours reported that in 1993
and 1994 the Market did quite well, but in 1995 the Market experienced four
rain -outs, and at that time there was a policy of reimbursing the vendors if
they were rained -out. Mr. Ours noted that had been financially disastrous
for the Market, and in 1996 that policy was changed, and the Market no longer
reimburses vendors for rain -outs. He pointed out there was a direct correlation
between the decrease in vendors and the loss of revenue for the 1996 Market,
stating the number of vendors must be increased this year in order to cover
the cost of the Market. Mr. Ours stated the goal has always been to make this
a self-sustaining market, and if they are unable to accomplish this in the
future, they will have to take a close look at how the Market is managed, and
whether or not it can be continued with the same type of management.
Mr. Ours stated they were requesting approval to close the same streets they have
in the past, noting they really want to increase the number of vendors so the
Market can extend all the way up Fourth Street to Cijos . He noted the merchants
in that section of Fourth Street have always been great participants in the
Market, and if we do not have enough vendors, then the Market cannot extend
to their location.
Mr. Ours stated staff is recommending the exact same contract with Celebrations
as we had last year, and for the same amount of money. However, in order to
start the Market this year, they would need additional funds; therefore, they
are requesting the Agency advance funds against future operations. He stated
they believed the money could be paid back because they are increasing the
number of vendors, as well as increasing the rates, and noted they were asking
for a three-year payback. He stated if the Market did not make a profit this
year, they would review the operation, and make sure they find a way to get
this money back. Mr. Ours stated he felt this would be a good investment,
and the Market would be able to cover the funds advanced by the Agency, noting
the Market was enjoyable, and he would like to see it continue Downtown.
Member Phillips asked if the $25,000 was needed for the coming year, or since the
Market was asking for a three-year payback, was the entire $25,000 the
anticipated loss for the coming year? Mr. Ours stated there is a three-month
period at the end of the year when they have no income coming in, and reported
they have approximately $4,000 in bills from last year's Market that have to
be paid, plus the start-ups for this year' s Market, plus the salary for someone
to actually get the Market going, which all total approximately $22,000 needed
right now to get the Market going. Mr. Ours stated that amount would be paid
back during the course of the Market, noting he had been looking at the three-year
payback to possibly make it a little softer hit on the Market, rather than
having to pay it back within one year.
Member Phillips asked what the total loss had been for last year? Mr. Ours stated
the total loss had been $875, but that did not take into consideration the
$10,000 we did not pay in salaries, explaining that according to the contract,
this was not our obligation, so we did not pay it; however, if we had the money,
we would have paid it. Therefore, we were very close to covering the costs
SRRA MINUTES (Regular) 3/3/97 Page 2
SRRA MINUTES (Regular) 3/3/97 Page 3
for last year, but because of the year before, we had no reserves, and began
the Market with a negative inflow at the beginning of the year, and did not
make a profit to pay back the money owed from the year before. Mr. Phillips
asked what the deficit figure had been that we carried over from the year before?
Mr. Ours reported it was $17,000. Member Heller asked if that
had been the loss carried over from 1995? Mr. Ours stated that was correct. Member
Phillips asked, if there was such a large loss coming into the year, how was the
following year funded? Mr. Ours stated there had been a loss for the operating
year, but there had also been a reserve, so they were able to pay the start-up
costs last
year; however, there is nothing left now, and all of the reserves are gone. Member
Phillips pointed out the loss for last year was only $875, and asked if that
meant the reserve would have been approximately the same amount? Mr. Ours
reported that was correct.
Mr. Phillips pointed out they were able to start the Market last year with
approximately the same amount of reserve as we have now. Mr. Ours noted that
last year the operator was willing to not take all her money until the third
month; however, we are not going into the beginning of this year's Market with
that amount of money, because we did not pay the last two months last year.
Mr. Phillips acknowledged that this would be a change in the start-up for
this year, and asked what kind of income Mr. Ours was projecting for this year?
Mr. Ours stated they anticipated a high point of approximately $93,000, noting
it was possible this amount could be even higher, if they sponsor a Merry
Marketplace again this year; however, he noted they did not know if they would
be able to find a location for that event this year. Mr. Phillips asked Mr.
Ours how much profit he was anticipating the Farmer's Market would make this
year? Mr. Ours stated he felt they would probably have approximately $10,000
profit for this year, noting this would depend on how much advertising they
do. He stated they would like to get themselves back in a positive cash flow
position, so they are trying to reduce costs as much as possible.
Chairman Boro asked if the 1996 income of $68,000, as shown in the staff report,
included the Merry Marketplace receipts? Mr. Ours stated the $68,000
represented only income from the Farmer's Market, noting income from the Merry
Marketplace was approximately $30,000, which resulted in a profit of
approximately $2,000 which went to the Farmer's Market to reduce its debt.
Chairman Boro asked if the $90,000 income projected for this year was based
on having the Merry Marketplace again this year? Mr. Ours stated they felt
the Farmer's Market would have $90,000 income, and they would have more than
that if they were able to do the Merry Marketplace.
Chairman Boro noted we had paid more for entertainment last year than we had in
the past, because of the caliber of entertainment we wanted to have, and asked
Mr. Ours if he felt it was important to continue to do that? Mr. Ours stated
they felt it was very important to continue to do this, because it is much
better entertainment, and we have had very positive responses from everyone
who attends the Market. He noted when we were asking the entertainers to perform
for free, we never really knew what we were going to get, and now we can request
a tape in advance, and interview the participants without any obligation to
allow them to perform. He noted there is a review committee, and the members
review the music before it goes on.
Member Cohen stated he was concerned with the issue of start-up costs, particularly
with what happens next year. He noted Mr. Ours had stated there was
approximately $22,000 in start-up costs, and $4,000 in debts. He asked, if
we are anticipating a net of $10,000, and $8,000 is repaid, which is a third
of the $25, 000 now being requested, then we would go into next year with $2, 000
SRRA MINUTES (Regular) 3/3/97 Page 3
SRRA MINUTES (Regular) 3/3/97 Page 4
and facing $22,000 in start-up costs. Mr. Ours stated they would begin next
year with $10,000 rather than $2,000, because they have already allocated the
repayment amount in their projected costs. Mr. Cohen noted that even if they
clear $10,000 after the loan payment is made, they would still be $12,000 short.
Mr. Ours stated if the salaries have been paid, they could probably negotiate
the start-up costs with the Contract Manager, until they got to a point where
there was money coming in again.
Brigitte Moran, Contract Manager with Celebrations, stated the reason she could
not run the Farmer's Market this year without the start-up costs, which she
did not receive until July for last year's Market, was because of the $10,000
loss from last year.
Member Heller pointed out that Mr. Ours had noted staff would be making
recommendations for changes in the Contract for Management, and asked what
kind of changes were anticipated? Mr. Ours stated they were looking at the
possibility of rolling this job into other functions that are happening in
the City right now, noting there are a lot of other events and filming going
on in San Rafael. He stated they would look at these
activities and see if there is a possibility of combining them all into one type
of a job that would take care of all the events. Ms. Heller asked if this
would have to be a contract person, and Mr. Ours stated that had not yet been
decided.
Member Cohen stated he was concerned about the financial future of the Market, noting
he was willing to provide the start-up money, and was also willing to recognize
the Agency might not get back all of the money. However, he stated they needed
to find a way for this not to be an annual occurrence, and that may mean changes
to the way the Market operates, or doing things that some people may not like,
noting they would just have to weigh those things as they go.
Member Heller asked if attendance at the Market had been about the same last year,
or if it had fallen off? Mr. Ours reported attendance had been slightly less,
but it was more a matter of generating less revenue last year. He stated there
were a lot of people who came particularly to see what some had called the
"unpopular" attractions, noting there had been a lot of comments and questions
about specific items that people repeatedly look for when they come to the
Market, but which were supplied by vendors no longer accepted by the Market.
Member Cohen thanked Brigitte Moran for her work on the Farmer's Market, and expressed
appreciation for her willingness last year to see the Market through and not
get the $10,000 that was in the contract last year.
Member Cohen moved and Member Heller seconded, to: a) Approve staff' s recommendations
for street closures, dates and hours of operation for 1997 Market (Thursday,
April 3 through Thursday, October 1, 1997). Street closures for the Market
will be Fourth Street between "B" to Cijos Streets from 5:00 PM to 9:30 PM,
"A" Street between Julia Street and the entryway to the "A" Street Parking
Structure from 5:00 PM to 9:30 PM, and Court Street between Fourth Street and
the Macy's parking lot entrance from 4:30 PM to 9:30 PM; b) Adopt Resolution
approving the Operations Contract with Celebrations, and c) Adopt Resolution
approving a $25,000 budget advance for start-up costs.
RESOLUTION NO. 97-6 -RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE A
CONTRACT WITH CELEBRATIONS TO OPERATE THE DOWNTOWN FARMERS MARKET FESTIVAL
FOR 1997 (FROM 1/1/97 - 12/31/97 FOR A FEE NOT TO EXCEED $60,800).
RESOLUTION NO. 97-7 - RESOLUTION APPROVING A BUDGET ADVANCE OF $25,000 TO FUND
SRRA MINUTES (Regular) 3/3/97 Page 4
SRRA MINUTES (Regular) 3/3/97 Page 5
START UP COSTS FOR THE 1997 FARMERS MARKET FESTIVAL.
AYES: MEMBERS: Cohen, Heller, Phillips & Chairman Boro
NOES: MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Miller
5. AGENCY MEMBER REPORTS:
None
There being no further business to come before the Redevelopment Agency, the meeting
was adjourned at 7:55 PM.
JEANNE M. LEONCINI, Agency Secretary
SRRA MINUTES (Regular) 3/3/97 Page 5