HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRB 2016-01-05 #3Meeting Date : January 5, :2016
Case Numbe rs : CDR15-007
Projec t Planner : Alan Montes -(415) 485-3397
Co mmun ity DovQ]opm ont D epartm ent -Pl annin g Di v isio n
REP O RT TO DE SI G N RE VIEW B OARD
SU B J E CT: 3105 K e rne r Blvd. -Concep tu al Design Rev iew for 60,343 squ are f oo t mini -stor age bu il ding
w ith an ad d itio n al 1,020 sq uare f o ot ca re t aker's res idence; APN: 009-122-14; Lig ht
!n du st ri al/O ffice (LI /O) Zo nin g Distri ct ; Math ew G uthri e, App li ca nt ; G len n Larsen , Own er ;
Ca n al Ne iglibo rh ood .
PROP ERTY FACTS
Site Characteristics
L ocat ion General Plan Des ign.ation Zoning Des i gnat ion Existing L a nd-Use
Project Site : Light Indus trial/Offi ce light Industrial/Office Storage
No rth Light Industrial/Office Li ght Ind ustria l/Office Automo ti ve Repa ir
So ut h Light Indu st rial/Office Li ght Indust ri al/O ffice Com mercial/O ffi ce uses
East Li ght In dus tri al/O ff ice Light In dustrial/O ffice Co mmercial/Office uses
West Genera l Com merc ial Ge nera l Commercia l Bank/O ffice
Sit e D evelopment Summa r y
Lot CoveraQ e He iQht
St a nda rd I NR Sta nd ard I 36 '
Pro posed 134.07 % P roposed I 36'
Parki nQ Setback s
Re qui red Re qui res Parking Stu dy Req ui red Pro posed
P rop ose d 7 St a nda rd , 9 Load in q F ro nt 20 ' 47'
S ide 10' or 20'/0 ' 5 1' m inimum
Rea r 10' 35'
L an d s c aping FAR
Re q uired 20% A ll owed Up t o 1.0· ·S ubject t o PC
ap prova l f o r
mi ni sto rage
Proposed 2 1.0 3% Existinq N/A
P ro posed 1.0 19
SUMMARY
T he projec t is be in g ref e rr ed to the Desi gn Revi ew Boa rd (Board) f or co ncept rev iew t o all ow t he
replace me nt of a n existi ng te m po rary se lf-stor age fac ility w it h a proposed 61,363 sq uare foot mini-
storage buil ding, in clud in g a ca reta ker's res ide nce . W he n t he project is s ub mi tted fo r f orma l review, it
w ill re qui re an Envi r onm en tal a nd Design Review Pe r m it an d Use Pe rm it. T he Pla nn ing Co mmissio n
wi ll act o n t h e pr op ose d p roj ect wi th th e reco mm e nd a tio ns f ro m th e Board .
As requ ired fo r a ll pr oj ects req uirin g a Pl a nn ing Co mmissio n-lev e l Envi ro nmen t al a nd Des ign Re vi ew
Permit , the app licant ha s subm itt ed for conceptu al design review to all ow the Board to prov ide ear ly
design commen ts on the proposed project. The Board 's recommendations shou ld be considered by the
app li cant for incorporation as revisions to th e project design prior to formal submittal. Planning staff
requests that th e Board review this report and provide recommendations on the project's comp liance
with al l pertinent design crrteria .
BACKGROUND
Site Description & Setting:
The proposed project site is a 60 ,548 square foot lot lo cated at th e south-east co rn er of Irene and
Kerner Blvd . (see Ex hibit 1). The neighborhood is a mixture of one -and two -story commercial and
industrial buildings with a va ri ety of arc hit ectural designs. The project site curre ntly is operafing as a
temporary self-s t orage facility with severa l cargo s hippin g co ntain ers placed on-s ite as storage units.
History:
The property ha s been approved as a temporary (interim use) se lf-storage since 1987 and ha s
reapplied for severa l use permit exte nsio ns.
• July 14, 1992. The Planning comm issio n conditiona lly approved a t emp orary mini -st orage site .
Th e applicant originally wanted to bui ld a ware house facility, but due to th e deve lopment
restricti on at the time , primari ly t r affic impacts, the cit y wo uld not supp ort a warehouse faci li ty .
The u se permit was approved until July 14, 1997, at which tim e it wou ld expire .
• Aug ust 10, 1998. The ex isting UP was extended for two-years and wo uld ex pire August 10 ,
2000 . It was noted th at no more extens ion s sh ou ld be permitted
• August 29 , 2006 . The ex isti ng UP was exte nd ed for an add iti ona l 5 yea rs and wou ld exp ir e
August 18 , 2011 .
• March 4, 2015 . The ex isti ng UP was exte nd ed for 10 years and would expire Ma rc h 4, 2025 .
T he initial approva l of th e project was gran,ted as an interim use of the prop erty , under the provisions of
the prior Genera l Pla n 2000 a nd zoni ng regulations w hi ch limited development potential due to limited
traffic capacity in the a rea . The C it y has since amended its Ge neral P lan and zo nin g standards to
remove traffic demand as a primary land use control.
The area remains severe ly cons train ed due to limited ab ility of the nearby intersection s to
accom mo da te additiona l traffi c wit hout causing unacceptable traffic congestion conditions . These
conditions h a ve remained preva lent for th e pasl15 yea rs. and the in terim use h as operat ed .
successfu ll y for a lmost 30 years . It is conside red app ropri ate to pursue a high est and best permanent
use of the s ite.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Use: The project proposes to co nst ru ct a th ree -story, 60,343 sq. ft. mini-storage building, provid ing
individua l sel f-storage unit s of varied sizes on each of the three floors . The 'project proposes to create
an on -site management office and caretaker's residence (an additional 1,020s.l. currently proposed in
exce s s of ministorage FAR).
S ite Plan : The project pro poses to co nstruct the mini -storage bui lding in th e center of th e lot with a
one-way drive aisle c i rc li ng the bu ildin g, and land scaping a long th e perimeter of the lot. T he bui lding
exceeds all se tback requirements . There are a total of 7 parking spaces and 9 load in g spaces a nd the
current landscaping will be increa sed to comp ly and exc eed cu rren t code requirements .
2
Ar.chitedure: The proposed building has a mixture of materials , the ground level being concrete with
metal rol l up doo rs and the upper levels having metal walls . Decorative features have been added on
the corne rs of the buildings, such as nori-vision w ind ows . The sca le is reduced along the pedestrian
access route in order to provide a more welcom in g atmosphere.
Landscaping: The project proposes to add 622 sq. ft. of additiona l landscaping along the perimeter of
the lo t , bringing the la nd scaping up from 20% to 21%. for a tota l of 12 ,732 s.f . of landscaping .
. ANALYSIS
General Plan 2020 Consistency:
The General P lan La nd Use Designation Is Light Indu stria l/Office (LIIO). The proposed project is
generally consistent with the General P lan Po li cies with regards to : 1) Pol icy LU-12 (8uilding Heights);
and 2) Policy LU-2·3 (L and Use).
Zoning Ordin a nce Consistency:
. Chapte r 4 -06 -8ase D istrict Regu lations
The Zoning designation for the site is Light Industrial/Office (L1/0). The proposed project meets the
8ase District Regu lation requirements for the Light In dustrial/Office Zoning District. The structur e is out
of all required s·e t backs, meets the height limit, and exceeds the landscaping minimum .
C h apter 16 -Site and U se Regulations
The applicant i s requesting to increase the FAR to 1 .0 for a mini-storage use , pursuant to 14.16.150 .
T he in te rim use cu rrently provides 20,480squa re feet of sto rage space.
Chapter 18 -Pa rking Standards
. Purs uant to 14.18 .040 a parking study required is ·required and is subject to approva l by the community
deve lopment director or hearing review body for the deve lopment. ne applicant has p roposed 7
parking spaces and 9 load ing spaces . The applicant is also required to have 1 designated c lean air
vehicle parking space.
In terms of parking lot landscaping, Pursuant to Section 14.18.1608, a minimum of 1 ca nopy tree for
every 4 parking spaces is requ ired . Clustering is a lso allowed , subj ect to the approval by the P la nning
Director or th e hearing review body .
Chapter 19 -Signs
Pursua nt to Tab le 14.19.2 the project is a ll owed to have a maximum of 2 signs per frontage . This limi ts
the signage to a maximum of 4 s igns. The project «u rr en tl y proposes 6 signs; including 2 monument
sig ns, 2 wall signs, and 2 identification sig ns . One of the proposed wall signs has no stree t front age and
is proposed to be fa c ing 580 Highway . Sta ff has id entified that th e hi g hway f aci ng sig n wou ld require a
major sign exceptio n and th at it's unli ke ly to have staff's s upp ort. No add iti onal detail, such as sq ua re
footage, has been identified at thi s time.
Chapter 25 -Enviro nmenta l and Design Review Permit
The project shou ld be evaluated for conformance with the review criteria identified in Chapter 25 of the
Zoning O rdinance and the San Rafael Non-Residential Design Guidelines (See Ex hibit 4). 80th
emphas ize th at new structures should be harmoniously integ rated in relation to both the specific site
design and the architectu re in the vicinity in t e rms of colors and materials , scale and bu ilding design.
Specific architectural design considerations include , but are not limited to the following :
}> Creation of interest in the building elevation
}> Provision of a s e nse of entry
}> Building Form
3
~ Encouragem e nt of natural materia l s a nd earth tonelwood tone co l or
~ Th e project s ize/sca le sho uld be analyzed as to th e approp riateness to th e existing
n e ighb orh ood sca le
~ Equa l attention to des ign of a /l facades
~ Co lor a nd Materials
~ Landsca p e design
Si mil arly , the Sa n Ra fae l No n-Residential Des ig n G ui de lines also have des ig n criter ia , some of wh ich
ove rl ap with th e Chapter 25 c riteria :
~ E ntryways
~ Building fo rm
~ Lig htin g
~ Parking lo ts
~ Awnings
~ Materia ls and Colors (exte rior m ateria ls shou ld minimize reflectivity)
~ Landsca ping
S taff has reviewed th e project and found that th e project is generally co nsis ten t wi th m any of th e design
c rit e ri a of Section 14.25 .050 of the Zo ning Ord in ance and th e Non -Resi dent ial Design Gu ideli nes in
th at:' 1) th e propo se d developme nt ha s been design ed to provid e a sense of e ntry with the reduced
sca le of the e ntra nce; 2) Th e promin e nt corn e rs of th e building h ave been designed t o create interest
wi th th e non-vision wind ows and eaves; 3) th e co lo r choice s are co nsis tent wit h section 14.25.050 in
th at they're shades of blu e, green , tan , and g rey. However, st aff req uests th at th e Boa rd comment on
the follow i ng design elements:
1. Co lo r: Co mm ents on the ' co lor se lection.
2. Land scapi ng : T he proj ect proposes to m eet or ex.cee d th e 20% land sca ping req uireme nt. In
terms of parking lot landscap ing , Pursuant to Secti on 14 .18.160B, a minimum of 1 ca n op y tr ee
for e very 4 park in g spaces is required . C lus te ring is a lso all owed, subject to th e approval by th e
P lanning Director or the hea rin g review body. T he Non-Re side nti al Desig n Guide lin es also
recommends that shade trees be provided in parking lots . Staff re qu es t s th Cl t the Board
com m e nt on the loc ati on of th e required parking l ot trees and th e types of tr ees .
3. Lighting : Co mment on possib le exte ri or li g ht fixture des ign/loca tion .
4 . Views: C h ap t er 25 states that hill s sho uld be pre served and enh anced from publi c. stre ets and
pub li c va ntage po int s. Th e propos e d proj ect w ill m ost likely i mp ac t the s urr ou nding hill s fr om th e
1-5 80 . See Ex hibit 5. .
NEIGHBORHOOD CORRESPONDENC E '
Staff rece iv ed no commen ts from th e public he aring notice ..
CONCLUSION
St aff supports th e propos ed mini -storage bUildin g , and is seeki ng ahy design guidance on the building
details and site des ign from the ORB . .
EXHIBITS
1. V icinity Map
4
2. App li cants Ju stifica tion Letter
3. RedLlced Proj ect Plans
4. Design Guid eline Criteria
5. View from Highway
Full-sized plans have been provided to the ORB members on ly.
cc : Mathew Guthrie, 10 Jewe ll , Sa n Rafael, CA 94901
Glenn Larsen, 336 Bon Air Center #505, Greenbrae , CA 94904
5
1212112015
'" "
',-/,-"
'-'.
,
~
#
.(> . . .(>
fxl"~,,f !
o 110 220 3S04~550tI
¥ " ,?..----
#'
3105 Kerner . 300' Radius
I
#'
,~\
.? .;
\
\. ;\
"..
\
\
..i --\~
\
http1lg;s.cilyofsanrafael.CA'[jsanrafael!fiJsiorVwidgetslPrinUprintpage_ms.php?mapfile=C%3A%2FOSGeo4W%2Ftmp%2Fsess_56781ro;je9853%2FSanRafaeI.map&mapname=SanRafael¢erxy=5984924.9964.. 212
Central San Rafael Self Storage
3105 Kerner Boulevard, San Rafael
California
Project Description
October 12; 2015
REC EIVED
OCT 1 e 2015
PLAN NI NG
Central San Rafae l Self Storage -Project Description
October 12, 2015
City of San Rafael
Community Development Department
1400 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, California 94915-1560
October 1;:, 2015
Re: Central San Rafael Self Storage -3105 Kerner Boulevard
Pre Application/ Conceptua l Design Review Submittal
Page: 2
This Project Description is attached to a Pre Application and Conceptual
Design Review submittal for Central San Rafael Self Storage (CSRSS), The
project is proposed to redevelop the existing San Rafael Self Storage
Emporium property at 3105 Kerner Boulevard with a new permanent self
storage facility_
SITE DESCRIPTION /SETIING
The property of 1.39 acres is located at the corner of Irene Street and Kerner
Boulevard. It is currently utilized as a self storage facility within metal
containers. The lot is flat, rectangular with mature trees along both street
frontages. All surrounding parcels are developed with a mixture of retail,
office, industrial and storage uses. (An ALTA and topographic/
improvement surveys are enclosed with this application).
PROTECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project consists of the construction of a 3 level, 61,490 square
foot building, associated parking and landscaping improvements. Storage
units of various sizes with ground floor exterior and elevator access, office
and caretaker's residence will be provided.
Central San Rafael Self Storage -Project Description
BACKGROUND
,
October 1~, 2015 Page: 3
The property is currently developed as a self storage facility utilizing
shipping containers. The use was approved in 1992. Ex tended several
times, the Use Permit was most recently extended by the City Zoning
Administrator on March 4, 2015 for a period of 10 years. During that
review, the Community Development Department recommended that we
consider development of a permanent storage facility on the site .
Central San Rafael Se lf Storage -Project Description October 12, 2015
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY
General Plan Designation: Light Industrial Office
Zoning: Light Industrial Office (LI/O)
Land Use:
Existing: Self Storage Proposed: Self Storage
The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and LI / 0
zoning in that mini-storage projects are a permitted use.
Minimum Lot Area (sq.ft.): 6,000
Proposed: 60,548
Minimum Lot Width (ft.): 60
Proposed: 207
Floor Area Ratio (FAR):
Site Area: 60,548 sq.ft. (1.39 acres)
Proposed Floor Area:
Storage including office:
Caretaker's residence
Proposed Floor Area Ratio: 1.0
60,548 sq.ft.
900 sq.ft.
Page : 4
Note that the ratio does not include the caretakers's residence
as FAR limits apply only to the non-residential component of a
development.
Minimum Yards :
Front: 20 '
Kerner: 47'
Maximum Building Height:
Proposed:
Side: 10' or 20' /0'
Irene: 62' / 51'
36'
36'
Rear: 10'
Rear: 35'
Minimum Landscaping (% of total site): 20 % -12,110 sq.ft.
Proposed: 22 % -13,568 sq.ft.
Required Parking: Parking Study required
Proposed: 13 Based on 15 years experience operating
San Rafael Self Storage at 675 Andersen Drive
See next section
\
Central San Rafael Self Storage -Project Description
PROPOSED SITE I BUILDING DESIGN
Access / CircuJ a tion:
October 12, 2015 Page : 5
Vehicular travel to the site is via East Francisco Boulevard from both the
north and the south. Although Irene Street provides both east and west
travel lanes, the east bound lane, as part of "the Loop", provides primarily
one way traffic channeling all north and south travel past the property
connecting at the point where Kerner provides only one way travel north.
Vehicular access to the property from Irene Street is not proposed in order
to eliminate left hand turns across the west bound lane. Vehicular acces s
from Kerner Boulevard has been located at the most northern point of the
property to provide the maximum distance from the intersection. Visitors
will have sufficient travel distance to see and turn from the lane adjacent to
the property into the entry.
On site circulation is by a one way perimeter loop providing access to
ground floor exterior storage units and allowing tenants to exit the site at
the Kerner Boulevard entry and travel north. Use of the Kerner Boulevard
exit eliminates north bound vehicles from having to exit on Irene, make a
left hand turn across west bound traffic and add vehicle movements
through the Irene / Kerner intersection.
To accommodate vehicles traveling south, an exit onto Irene with a right
turn only limitation has been provided to allow connection to and travel
south on East Francisco Boulevard. This movement will eliminate those
vehicles from having to travel north on Kerner and through the Kerner /
Bellam intersection.
Parking:
CSRSS developers own and operate San Rafael Self Storage (SRSS) at 675
Andersen Drive since 2001. That facility has a gross area of 48,000 square
feet and 9 parking stalls on site. Peak stalls required including employees
has never exceeded 5 at any single time. CSRSS, a facility 25 % larger than
SRSS, proposes a total of 13 stalls, 44 % more than SRSS . 6 stalls, including
accessible, electric vehicle charging and fuel efficient stalls, are located near
Central San Rafael Self Storage· Project De sc ription October 12, 2015 Page: 6
the project vehicular entry and office. 3 stalls provide an unloading area
under cover near the elevators with 4 overflow stalls nearby.
In addition, the one way perimeter circulation also provides sufficient
width for a lane of parking adjacent to the ground floor exterior entry units
and a pass through lane.
A bicycle rack will be located adjacent to the office.
Landscaping:
Existing landscaping along the street frontages will be expanded to depths
of 24' to 36' and rehabilitated to provide efficient irrigation and drought
tolerant planting. Existing mature trees are to be maintained except where
they are located in areas for new driveways, infrastructure / site
improvements or impair visual identification of vehicular access or the
building.
New landscape areas are proposed along the western property line
blending with existing landscaping on the adjacent property and along the
northern property line which would incorporate any required bio swales.
Total landscape area will comply with Light Industrial/Office zoni ng
requirement for 20% of the site to be landscaped.
Building Design:
Primary architectural elements are located at the corners where the
building is first viewed from the public right of way and at the Kerner
Boulevard entry where the building is stepped down to present a lower
inviting profile to all entering the site. The arrangement of overhangs,
facade relief, fenestration, exterior building materials and colors is
presented in a harmonious and balanced design. All building elevations
have been treated in a similar manner to create interest around the entire
building.
Exterior building materials include horizontal and vertical
Central San Rafael Self Storage · Project Description October 1~, 2015 Page: 7
pre-finished metal siding and panels, painted concrete masomy ground
level walls and aluminum storefront at the building corners and the office.
The elevator tower measures 36' high, the remainder of the building does
not exceed 33' in height.
TRAFFIC
A Focused Traffic Analysis prepared by W -Trans, Traffic Engineering
Consultants, is enclosed with this submittal.
GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS
A Geotechnical Investigation and Phase Environmental Site Assessment
prepared by Miller Pacific Engineering Group, Geotechnical Engineers, is
enclosed with this submittal.
GRADINGIDRAINAGE
Preliminary grading and drainage design provides for the building
finished floor elevation to be at 11.0 NAVD in order to comply with FEMA
Base Flood Elevation of 10 and take into account projected future
settlement of 12" over the next 30 years. Orculation, parking and
driveways have been designed to accommodate the change in elevation
between the proposed finished floor and existing street elevations.
Landscape areas along the entire property perimeter provide sufficient area
and location to provide required bio-swales to treat site drainage.
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR)
The General Plan permits a maximum FAR of 1.0 for mini-storage with a
Planning Commission approved Use Permit in accordance with the
following findings:
The facility is needed in the community:
Central San Rafael Self Storage -Project Description October 1~, 2015 Page : 8
Storage projects in East San Rafael have a near 100 % occupancy. The
developers of CSRSS have operated San Rafael Self Storage at 675
Andersen Drive for the last 15 years with constant near 100 occupancy.
With the abundance of businesses and office in East San Rafael there is
particularly a need for storage for accounting records, supplies, tools and
extra stock.
The project is compatible with surrounding uses:
All surrounding parcels are developed with a mixture of retail, office,
industrial and storage uses. The proposed use generates no noise, very
little activity or traffic .
The project is designed so that it cannot be converted to other more intense
uses and the location is appropriate for this type of use:
The project cannot be converted to a more intense use. There are limited
windows and no heating, electrical capacity, or water or sewer to support a
more intense use. The City has determined the site is appropriate for this
type of use designating the site LI/ 0 which allows storage as a permitted
use.
We would request Planning Department comment with regard to these
findings.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUAUTYACT COMPLIANCE:
The project is proposed as an in-fill development consistent with General
Plan Light Industrial/Office land use designation and zoning in that mini-
storage is a permitted use and the proposed design complies with all
zoning regulations.
The project site is less than 5 acres, completely surrounded by urban uses,
has no habitat value and is adequately served by all required utilities and
public services .
Central San Rafael Self Storage -Project Description October 12, 2015 Page: 9
Project studies indicate no significant effects relating to traffic and none are
foreseen relating to noise, air or water quality.
As the project does not present any unusual circumstances, we would
request Planning Deparhnent comment as to whether the proposal would
be considered an in-fill project in accordance with C.E.Q.A. Guidelines
section 15332 Class 32.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
We would request the Planning Deparhnent clarify the extent of the
affordable housing requirement of Zoning Ordinance 14.16.030 applicable
to the proposed project. One full time person will be employed at the
facility and one two bedroom aparhnent will be provided for their use.
The site is currently developed as a storage facility and continuance of that
use is not projected to increase the demand for affordable hOUSing.
SITE CLEARANCE
Existing metal containers will be removed and recycled. Existing fire walls
between containers will be demolished, removed and recycled. NorBay
Consulting performed asbestos and lead inspections of the storage
containers and fire walls and laboratory tests detected no presence of
either. A copy of the report is enclosed with this submittal . We would
request that the Building Deparhnent provide any permit requirements to
accomplish this work.