HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRB 2016-02-17 #5Meeting Date:
• Case Numbers:
Project Planner:
Community Development Department -Planning Division Agenda Item:
REPORT TO DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
February 17 , 2016
ED15-082 & UP16-001
Paul Jensen, (415) 485-506 4(:11
SUBJECT: San Rafael Fire Station 57-3530 Civic Center Drive -Request for Environmental and
Design Review Permit to replace the existing Fire Station 57 with the development of a new
fire station (9,600 square feet), that will include the Medic 3 (paramedic) currently located at
Fire Station 53. The project includes associated site and landscaping improvements and an
aOO-square foot storage building for this County-owned site. APN: 179-270-12; Public/Quasi-
Public (P/QP) District; City of San Rafael, applicant; County of Marin, property owner; Civic
Center/Santa Venetia Neighborhoods.
PROPERTY FACTS
*
Location
Project Site:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Lot Size
General Plan Designation
Public/Quasi-Public
Public/Ouasi'Public
Public/Quasi-Public
Low-Density Residential
Low-Residential
Public/Quasi-Public
Required: Not required
Proposed : 0.83 acres
Height
Allowed: 36 feet
Proposed: 29'10"
Parking
Required: Based on a parking study
Proposed: 10 spaces
Min. Lot Width (New lots)
Required: NA
Proposed: NA
Outdoor Area OR Landscape Area
Required : . 10% coverage
Proposed: 18% coverage
Grading
Total: 1,300 cubic yards of earth movement
Cut: 1,300 cubic yards
Fill: 0 cubic yards
Off-Haul: 1,300 cubic yards
Zoning Designation
P/QP
Existing Land-Use
Fire Station
PlOP
P/QP
Dog parking , surface parking
US Post Office
RA-B1 (County)
RA-B1 (County)
PlOP
Single-family residential
Single-family residential
Civic Center Administration Bldg
Lot Coverage (Max.)
Standard: Not required
Proposed : 20%
Gross Building/Floor Area
Allowed: 1.0
Proposed: 0.31
Upper Floor Area (Non-hillside residential)
Allowed: NA
Proposed: NA
Setbacks
Front:
Side(s):
Ext. side:
Ped. side:
Bldg. sep:
Rear :
Required
None
10 feet
NA
NA
o feet
10 feet
Tree Removal
Existing
10 feet
20 feet
NA
NA
o feet
o feet
Proposed
21 feet
12-24 feet
NA
7-8 feet
170 feet
15 feet
Total(NO.lspecies): 9 Coast live oak; 12 California redwoods; 5
Requirement:
Proposed:
Monterey pine; 1 spruce
No requirement (3: 1 replacement ratio for
oaks = policy)
1 Coast live oak; 12 California redwoods
Standard building height is measured from an established exterior finished grade elevation to mid-point of a
sloped roof.
SUMMARY
The project proposes to replace the existing Civic Center Fire Station 57 with the development of a new
fire station, which would include paramedic services (relocation of Medic 53). Board review of the site
and design improvements of this project is required pursuant to San Rafael Municipal Zoning Code
Section 14.25.040A.1.e (Major Physical Improvement, new public structures). The Board's
recommendation will be forwarded to the Planning Commission. As this is a City-sponsored project, the
City Council will also review and take action on the final design. Staff concludes that the project
adequately addresses the applicable Environmental and Design Review Permit criteria of SRMC
Section 14.25.050, but there are specific issues associated with the site (discussed below) that require
discussion and consideration. Staff requests that the Board review this report and provide a
recommendation on compliance with all pertinent design criteria. Specifically, staff asks the Board to
consider the following:
Site Plan
• Whether the proposed building location and site layout is practical and suitable for the function of
the public use.
• Whether the filling of the 0.25-acre, willow scrub wetland (located at the southeast end of the site) is
necessary and unavoidable to accommodate the essential uses and services of this project.
Architecture
• Whether the contemporary design is suitable for the function of the building, compatible with the
adjacent single-family residences, and not in conflict with the other structures on the Marin Civic
Center campus (Marin County Civic Center National Register District).
Materials and Colors
• Whether the materials and colors are suitable for the proposed contemporary architecture and
comply with the Civic Center Master Design Guidelines, Royston, Hanamoto, Alley & Abey
(December 2005)
Landscaping
• Whether the proposed tree removal is appropriate and adequately off-set with the proposed new
tree plantings.
• Whether the landscape design and materials are compatible with the landscaping improvements at
the Civic Center campus.
BACKGROUND
Site Description & Setting:
The subject property is a level, 0.83-acre site (36,100 square feet) that is a part of the greater 66.55-
acre Marin County Civic Center campus. The subject 0.83-acre site is leased to the City of San Rafael
by the County of Marin. The front portion of the subject property is developed with a one-story fire
station (San Rafael Fire Station 57), which is approximately 4,500 square feet in size and contains
apparatus bays. Vehicle access to the apparatus bays is provided by a driveway connecting to Civic
Center Drive and Golf Avenue (residential street). The existing Fire Station 57 was built in 1977 and
serves the City as well as unincorporated areas of San Rafael (Santa Venetia, Los Ranchitos) via
Community Service Area (CSA) 19.
The existing fire station was built in 1977 and contains some of the architectural characteristics of the
other buildings on the Civic Center campus (arched window openings, pink/flesh-colored stucco
exterior surface). The rear portion of the site is undeveloped and unpaved. This area is used for
informal storage by the County and is bisected by an open drainage swale. The southern portion of the
drainage swale is surrounded by a stand of willow scrub. The willow scrub is approximately 0.25 acres
2
and was confirmed as jurisdictional wetland under the Clean Water Act by the US Army Corps of
Engineers in 2009.
The fire station building is bordered by landscape setbacks. As recorded in the Property Facts table
above (page 1), there are a number of mature trees on the site. These trees include a cluster of Coast
live oak trees, 12 Califomia redwood trees, five Monterey pine and one spruce.
Surrounding uses include the US Postal Service Office (Civic Center Branch) located to the south,
single-family residences to the south and east (unincorporated San Rafael), a public dog park and
parking lot to the north, and the Marin County Administration Building to the west.
The Fire Station 57 site lies within the boundaries of the Marin County Civic Center National Register
District. However, it has been determined that the fire station structure is not a contributor to the
National Register District and does not meet the criteria for inclusion in the National Register or the
California Register (Marin Civic Center Fire Station-Architectural Historical Assessment, Tom Origer &
Associates (November 11 2015).
History:
In 2015, the City Council adopted the San Rafael Essential Facilities Strategic Plan , which presents the
City's road map for the replacement or improvements to aging emergency service facilities . The City
Council authorized funding for Phase 1 of this plan which includes the rebuilding of Fire Station 57, as
well as Fire Station 52 (210 3rd Street) and a new Public Safety Center (Fire Station 52-Downtown and
Police Department facilities) on 5th Avenue.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A detailed description of the project is provided in a written text, which is presented in Exhibit 3 of this
staff report. A brief summary is provided below.
Use: The project proposes the construction of a new 9.597 -square foot, two-story fire station that is
proposed to house five on-duty fire fighters in a 24-hour shift and paramedic services (Medic 53). The
plan includes three drive-through apparatus bays , the North Area Medical Supply Cache , public lobby ,
sleeping quarters, kitchen and restroom facilities and ancillary uses (surface parking and storage
facilities).
Site Plan: The station building is proposed to be sited and oriented toward Civic Center Drive which
includes a pedestrian entrance and driveway access for the fire apparatus. A parallel driveway is
proposed east of the station building , which would provide access to a rear parking lot (10 surface
parking spaces) and a future, SOO-square foot storage building. Fire apparatus access would utilize this
driveway to return to the station's apparatus bays. A separate, gate-secured driveway is proposed to
provide access to the rear portion of the site via Golf Avenue, a residential street. See Plan Sheet A-
1.2. Plan Sheet A-1.3 presents site cross-sections incorporating the proposed building and site
improvements.
Architecture: The station design presents a contemporary design that has mid-century architectural
design features including a large overhang at the pedestrian entrance, an arched roof and simple
forms . At this time, no design specifics have been developed for the future storage structure.
Exterior building materials include a combination of cement plaster, stone (budget permitting)/smooth
troweled plaster, aluminum windows and a metal standing seam roof.
See Plan Sheet A-3. Plan Sheet A-4 presents cross-sections through the building.
3
Landscaping: The design includes a small , circular plaza , stairway and accessibility ramp along the
Civic Center Drive frontage. Further, landscape buffers are proposed along the edges of the rear
portion of the site . Landscaping includes a combination of trees, shrubs and ground cover. The project
proposes the removal of existing trees, which is discussed below in the Analysis section of this report .
See Plan Sheets A-1A and A-1 .5.
Lighting: A detailed exterior lighting plan has been prepared. Exterior lighting includes a combination
of pole-standards, wall-mounted scones and bollards . A photometric assessment is included in the
plan . See Plan Sheet A-1.7.
Grading/Drainage: As noted above , although the site is level, site grading is required to address the
proposed project design. Grading is estimated to require 1,300 cubic yards of earth movement with
1,300 cubic yards of export. As noted above , the rear portion of the site contains a drainage swale and
low-lying area that of Corps jurisdictional wetland (willow scrub) that will require fill to build the rear
park ing lot and storage structure . The City will be coordinating with the County of Marin (as property
owner) to provide wetland mitigation for this f ill on the Civic Center campus . See Plan Sheet A-1.6.
Signage : A facility identification sign is proposed above the pedestrian entrance overhang facing Civic
Center Drive, which consists of individual letters reading ("Fire Station No. 57"), which replicates the
signage theme found on the other Marin Civic Center buildings. In addition , a large , wall-mounted
metal number "57 " is proposed adjacent to the apparatus bay doors. See Plan Sheet A-3 .
ANALYSIS
General Plan 2020 Consistency:
The project has been reviewed for consistency with the pertinent goals, policies and programs of the
San Rafael General Plan 2020. Input and direction on project consistency with the General Plan is
requested of the Design Review Board .
A summary of key poliCies and programs is provided below, along with a staff response . The project is
consistent with the pertinent policies 'of the Land Use Element including ; Policy LU-23 (Land Use and
Map Categories -Public/Quasi-Public); Policy LU-9 (Intensity of Nonresidential Land Use Development
-1.0 floor area ratio cap); Policy LU-12 (Building Heights-maximum height of 36 feet); and Policy LU-
14 (Land Use Compatibility). Other key policies to consider are as follows:
NH-B6 . DeSign Considerations for Development in the Vicinity of the Civic Center.
a. Require urban design analysis to assure compatibility with materials, color and building masses
with Civic Center.
b. Require functional interconnection with Civic Center.
c . Design to compliment Civic Center architecture rather than compete.
d. Site design should retain vistas where visible to Mt. Tamalpais.
e. Encourage retention of existing historic structures.
f Encourage the County to enhance the existing Civic Center Drive are with safe and pleasant
walkways.
g. Encourage the County to have proposals go through Design Revie w process, and involve North
San Rafael community in evaluation of design , etc.
CD-3 . Neighborhoods. Recognize, preserve and enhance the positive qualities that give
neighborhoods their unique identities , while also allowing flexibility for inno vative design. Develop
programs to encourage and respect the contex t and scale of existing neighborhoods.
CD-4. Historic Resources. Protect San Rafael's positive and distinctive image by recognizing,
preserving and enhancing the City's historic resources.
4
CA-13. Historic Buildings and Areas. Preserve buildings and areas with special and recognized
historic, architectural or aesthetic value including but not limited to those on the San Rafael
Historical/Architectural Survey. New development and redevelopment should respect architecturally
and historically significant buildings and areas.
CON-3. Wetland Protection and Mitigation. In order to protect and preserved valued wetlands, loss
of wetlands due to filling shall be avoided unless it is not possible or practical. When it is
demonstrated that it is not possible or practical to avoid filling a wetland because of site constraints
and conditions such as the geographical location of the wetlands, site configuration and size,
require that the wetland be placed on-site, and in-kind at a minimum ratio of 2:1 (e.g., 2 acres for
each acre lost). If it is determined that on-site mitigation is not possible or practical, off-site
mitigation shall be required at a minimum ratio of 3: 1. As assessed and determined on a case-by-
case basis, the City may waive this policy for fill of small wetlands (0.1 acres or less in size,
provided that: 1) the wetland is isolated meaning that it is not within, as part of, directly connected
with or hydrologically-linked by natural flow to a creek, drainageway, wetland or submerged
tidelands; 2) it is demonstrated by a wetland expert that the preservation of the wetland is not
practical as it would not result in a functioning biological resource because of its isolation; 3) the
City has determined that the filling will result in a more appropriate and desirable site plan for the
project; and 4) the City consults with and considers comments received from the appropriate
resource agencies with wetland oversight (State of California Department of Fish and Wildlife
and/or California Regional Water Quality Control Board).
Staff Comments: Overall, as proposed, staff finds that the project is consistent with the pertinent
policies and programs of the San Rafael General Plan 2020. The project has been designed to
complement the Marin Civic Center buildings and is in-scale with the residential development located
southeast of the station site. Consistent with the recommendations of the Marin Civic Center Fire
Station-Architectural Historical Assessment (referenced above), the plans are being reviewed by our
architectural historian consultant (Tom Origer & ASSOciates) to ensure that they meet the County's
design guidelines and the Secretary of Interior Standards for new construction .
Regarding Conservation Element Policy CON-3 (Wetland Protection and Mitigation), staff finds that the
wetland fill (0 .25 acres) resulting from this project cannot be avoided because of its geographic
location . Given the size (small), as well as the geographic isolation, preserving this wetland would not
be practical. Further, it would not be possible to provide a suitable setback buffer to protect it from
surrounding development (50-foot wetland buffer/setback required by Conservation Element Policy
CON-4, Wetland Setbacks). The City has hired a qualified wetlands specialist to: a) assess this
wetland; b) secure an updated US Army Corps of Engineers jurisdictional determination; and c)
recommend appropriate mitigation. City staff is working with the Marin County staff to identify other
areas within the Marin Civic Center campus that may be suitable for in-kind mitigation . As this project
is subject to environmental review, this issue will be studied and included in the environmental
dOcument.
Zoning Ordinance Consistency:
Chapter 4-11 -Base District(s)
The project is subject to the development standards for the Public/Quasi-Public (P/QP) District,
pursuant to Chapter 4 (Section 14.04.040) of the municipal code (Zoning Ordinance). The property
development standards that are applicable tei the project are identified in the Site Development
Summary Matrix presented at the beginning of this report.
Staff Comments: The project meets the site development standards of the PIQP District.
Chapter 18 -Parking Standards
5
Chapter 18 does not specify a specific parking standard for public facility uses, but does require that the
parking requirement be determined based on a parking study. Section 14.18.160 requires that parking
areas that are visible from the public street be screened to headlight height and that one canopy tree be
provided for every four parking spaces.
Staff Comments: A detailed parking study has not been prepared for this project. However, the off-
street parking that is proposed is based on demand and need for the proposed use, is consistent with
off-street parking provided for similarly-sized facilities. The parking has been reviewed and deemed to
be adequate by the City Engineer.
Regarding parking lot landscaping and tree cover, the landscape plan has been designed to comply
with the tree canopy requirements set forth in Section 14.18.160. In addition, landscaping is proposed
to establish a buffer from rear parking lot and the adjacent residences. For information regarding tree
removal and replacement, see the discussion under Chapter 25 (Environmental and Design Review
Permit).
Chapter 25 -Environmental and Design Review Permit
The project is subject to the review criteria for Environmental and Design Review Permits , pursuant to
SRMC Section 14.25.050 (Review criteria : Environmental and Design Review Permits) of the Zoning
Ordinance , as follows:
• Site Design. There should be a harmonious relationship between structures within the development
and between the structures and the site . Proposed structures and site development should be
related accordant to existing development in the vicinity. There must be a consistent organization of
materials and a balanced relationship of major elements. Site Features and Constraints such as
significant trees and wetlands. access, parking, circulation and drainage should be considered.
• Architecture. The project architecture should be harmoniously integrated in relation to the
architecture in the vicinity in terms of colors and materials, scale and building design . The design
should be sensitive to and compatible with historic and architecturally significant buildings in the
vicinity, and should enhance important community gateways, view corridors and waterways as
identified in the general plan. Energy-efficient design should be considered.
• Materials and Colors. Materials and colors should be consistent with the context of the surrounding
area. To minimize contrast of the structure with its background as viewed from the surrounding
neighborhood, color selection shall coordinate with the predominant colors and values of the
surrounding landscape and architecture. High-quality building materials are required. In hillside
areas, as identified in Section 14.12.020 of this title, natural materials and colors in the earth tone
and woodnote range are generally preferred. Other colors and materials may be used which are
appropriate to the architectural style, harmonious with the site and/or compatible with the character
of the surrounding environment.
• Ex terior Lighting. Light sources should provide safety for the building occupants, but not create a
glare or hazard on adjoining streets or be annoying to adjacent properties or residential areas.
• Landscape Design . The natural landscape should be preserved in its natural state, insofar as
practicable, by minimizing grading, and tree and rock removal. The landscaping shall be designed
as an integral enhancement ofthe site , sensitive to natural site features (e .g., trees and wetlands),
as well as water-efficient landscaping (MMWD water conservation ordinance compliance) should be
considered.
Staff Comments: Staff finds that the design of the project generally complies with these criteria.
Regarding the resulting need to fill the isolated , 0.25-acre wetland, please refer to the above comments
6
under San Rafael General Plan 2020 consistency review. The architecture should be carefully
reviewed to ensure that the design is compatible with the existing structures on the Marin Civic Center
campus and the adjacent residential neighborhood. Exterior lighting and landscaping should be
reviewed to ensure that there is an adequate buffer between the project and adjacent residents and
that lighting will not adversely impact residents.
The project would result in the removal of mature trees including one Coast live oak and 12 California
redwood trees. Given the location of the trees, the configuration of the site, and the site planning and
circulation needs for the essential facilities . equipment and apparatus, the tree removal is unavoidable.
The City does not have an adopted tree preservation ordinance but it is City policy to require tree
replacement for loss of native species, particularly oaks and redwoods. Varying native tree
replacement ratios have been required for projects based on site and tree conditions and specimen
status. The landscape plan has been designed to partially address this tree loss with a replanting
program.
San Rafael Design Guidelines:
On November 15,2004, The City Council adopted Resolution 11667, adopting interim San Rafael
Design Guidelines. The interim design guidelines provide City staff with direction in reviewing the
design of new development for consistency with the San Rafael General Plan 2020 Community Design
Element. These interim guidelines provide a framework of design principles in order to improve visual
unity of the area. Staff requests that the Board provide guidance in evaluating the project for
consistency with the following applicable to Non-Residential Design Guidelines and Historic and
Architecturally Significant Buildings:
Parking Lots
• Design for adequate vehicle maneuverability in parking areas. Vehicles should not back out
from a parking space onto the street.
• Parking areas should be screened from the street with hedges, walls, fences or berms, subject
to security considerations.
• Shade trees should be provided in parking lots per the zoning ordinance.
Lighting
• Limit the intenSity of lighting to provide for adequate site security and for pedestrian and vehicular
safety.
• Shield light sources to prevent glare and illumination beyond the boundaries of the property.
• Lighting fixtures should complement the architecture of the project.
Bui/ding Form
• A continuity of design, materials, color, form and architectural details is encouraged for all portions
of a building and between all the buildings on the site.
• Consider the development's visual and spatial relationship to adjacent buildings and other
structures in the area.
Materials and Colors
• Use articulation, texturing and detailing on all concrete exposed to exterior view.
• Exterior materials should minimize reflectivity.
• Use color to provide appropriate accents on a building.
7
Pattern and Scale
• New buildings, additions or major remodels in the vicinity of a building in the
[Historic/Architectural] Survey should respect the pattem, scale and design of the older building,
and not create visual distractions,
Staff Comments: In general, the project meets the City's interim design guidelines, However, it is
requested that the Board particularly review the adequacy of the landscaping and the appropriateness
of the exterior lighting proposed for the rear parking lot The rear parking lot abuts a low-denSity
residential neighborhood so an adequate landscape buffer and low-intensity lighting is critical and
necessary to maintain the character and quality of life to neighboring residences, Further, Board input
on the building design and materials/colors is requested to ensure that the project is compatible and
does not conflict with the historic Marin Civic Center buildings,
Marin County Civic Center Master Design Guidelines
As discussed above , the subject property is within the Marin County Civic Center National Register
District Although not a contributor to the District, the design of the new fire is subject to review for
consistency with the Marin County Civic Center Master Design Guidelines, These County design
guidelines are presented in Attachment 4 of this staff report, The City's consulting architectural
historian is reviewing the plans for consistency with these guidelines, Absent the findings of this
review, staff finds that the project design is consistent with the County design guidelines, particularly: a)
Buildings and Architecture, Siting (A), Scale (C) and Building Height (D); b) Function, Parking Approach
(C); c) Visual Impact, Form (A), Roof Treatment (B), Materials (C), and Color (F),
The new fire station is subject to review and approval by the County Board of Supervisors, as well as a
review by and recommendation from the Frank Lloyd Wright Civic Center Conservancy (Conservancy),
On January 27,2016, the proposed plans for Fire Station 57 were presented to the Conservancy, The
Conservancy unanimously supported the project design, as proposed, Notes from the Conservancy
meeting are provided in Attachment 5 of this staff report,
NEIGHBORHOOD CORRESPONDENCE
Public notice of this meeting was provided to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the
subject property, In addition, a notice board was posted on the subject property informing the public
about the scope of the project and the date/time of the Design Review Board meeting, On February
10,2016, the City conducted an open house at the existing fire station and invited the community to
review the proposed plans,
EXHIBITS
1, Vicinity Map
2, Reduced Project Plans
. 3, Station 57 Project Description, Mary McGrath Architects; January 22, 2016
4, Marin County Civic Center Master Design Guidelines (excerpts); December 20 , 2005
5, Meeting Notes from Frank Lloyd Wright Civic Center Conservancy Meeting; January 27 , 2016
Full-sized plans have been provided to the ORB members only
cc: Mary McGrath Architects
1212 Broadway, Suite 401
Oakland, CA 94612
8
Raaj Patel
Kitchell
2750 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95833
David Speer
Office of County Administrator
County of Marin
Civic Center Drive, Room 325
San Rafael, CA 94903
North San Rafael Coalition of Residents
Carolyn Lenert
P.O. Box 6642
San Rafael, CA 94903
Santa Venetia Neighborhood Association
Attn: Linda Levey
PO Box 4047
San Rafael, CA 94913
9
.;> /;/ ,r
" " /' / / i' .;>
$ (
" CIJ .' > .-
" $
... c ...
CIJ
+' s:::
CIJ
U
u .-> .-u
0
M
Lon
M
I
'1""'1
+' . w
" r
. -
o • .c • • ~ ~ • ~ 8 0
.-.s::: , >< W
N
I-
iii
::I:
X w
i
j
I
~
i
If
'1
!
E!~ -I" !~~ ~
~~8*~ i~~g;
n~~~
0 ..
I
~
~
! I !
l ! i
.... w w :r
'" 0: w > 8
!"i "j I~! I !il
5 !
• ~ ~ w .. l ~ r;; ~
0: Z ~
~ Q ~
VI ~ ~ ~ .... 0
0", ! ~ ~:il <.> ~ ,
CD
-:
'"
~
§
i • ! I • 1 ; i
... ...;
>I~!!l .hi , I
~, II ~~ ~! III~ !l ~
.,
!ii§ I. ~! •
I
~~ ,
II . ~ ~
~~ ,
--
,
!
~ ~ ~ , ~i
t:t::Ji ~~; ; \1 ! !e ". •• ~~
~ ihl Iii i
1111 ~t:t:: ,
II! l!: II ,,, , , ~
. ~
;;; ~
I I
i i
II
II ! II a ! I ! H!i! it'll ! ,
! ! i !
~;L-------------------
OVoti.:l 109 •
:;: ~
~ ~ ~
I!!. S /f~~-----------'-------'s ~ ,~ .. ~
'r:,'
::l ,
'"
d
I I I
I I j
F i i
! ! I II ! .. 1 Ii ,
! : ,
i ~
I II' II
h 1.1 II [I; I I I
i
~. a
,
5 • ~ w _ ~ ~. 0
'" . ! ,
i z ! ), z z
J
i 0 ! Iii G 0 Q
! 6 , ~ t; w i ill ~ ~ , i _ .. COT w -iT I!! r -w ~ t:
'" ~ ~ i ~ If i '" , .. " I' <.l , I .. . j!11 )1
~
I • ~J "''''~ O:z
~ O!
"'li i ~I-
a '" ~ r= liE § ..,~
(I)
e
I
(Ii.!;
~~J
, .. . . . ... .. .
!::
: :.:
/ tf,
/
/
/
/
~
us POST OfFICE PAlWNG
"'"
cJ
-,
I
I
L
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
FIRE STATION 57 •
n"'CMClJRfVt.!W<~GWI'!MJoI(A_J
'~11""""",,",,'."""''''' ~.G""ll ~s~ ---
r-"'--/ -,
co -*
r:i'.. _-..."",-,--..,., .--.-... :=.-:= --~ "-
~ o
TREE LEGEND -o -o
o
........ ",""-, -"'--'" -... --~ .. """""
-~ ~<.a.~-.="'"
-~ ... -' ------""'""""'~----.~
-~ -' -~ ....... ,.,.,~o<lCtt
~~I. --
REFER TO SHEET LI.I FOR PLANT INS LE&END
A·l.4
CONCEPTUAL PLANTING PLAN $ (gn~-:,""" I .--_. ... -
H , i! i!
j I I
1 I I
\~9~i
·-E8 -li
c z w
'" ~
'" z
~ .
::l
~
~. . " . " . ~. i
v z . o v.
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
FIRE STATION 57
lUOCMCDAA'!.SAII __ ~g.&!w
/ / , ,
/
I
FF=J J.50
I
I
I
,
, '''~ ! f03}~s ')po -,~) i
D
I
CIVIL SITE AND GRADING PLAN
1·~2Q'
L
[
on:r, Jtt_I't4II _~.......,,. ___ _
:._"""""t!Jl£ ..... »D;r:!O:!'
TYPICAL BID-RETENll DN SECTION ."
A-1.6
:r ------
_; __ .. _...J---_._ .. -
,
,
I '
"
----~'~"~1' I ,'
I' , I ' \
:~ .. -,,' f }
.---~.--: .' ..
1 .i .}
" ",;
w
w--
Eb
~-. '~ ~~----------------------~ -----~ L. ______ _
.----------~~~~---r----~ ----.I
~
FIRST FLOOR PlAN A
BlDIl .A!I',,·6,&55 $.F. ~
FIRE STATION TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 9,597 S.F. e CITY OF SAN RAFAEL • !?, I FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR PLANS
. :..:..;,... FIRE STATION 57 lZl1-..rw<AY.$I.WT'¥I1 L • • " <:W>AIIO.c ..... 1l
_ J5JOCMCDM'E.5MW"'lCAU~iII90!IO:'l ofIonc:=_""" $IC4lE,ur·".o'
--~
A
~
w-
Eb
'-,
''-,
w
''-, /
':;"L
'-,
''-''
I r-IIOOI'U~
I
I
I
I •
t:" ---:-'
~
r-nn-----=tJ !kt~"~ \JI !
I r--Ii iii I A'" /11 ir---li I i---+
I
I
I
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
EILOO .... ~u.. 2,74l V . 4J
" $
~--
I
_ ........ ,
(if ." ""--" A-2 OlJl.'1201~ ----
I
I
I
I
,
I
! n
l
""".S!
II -j ,-
!? •
, ,
~ ,
k.,
-; '."-' ~."
-:-.. /' '. 11 ;;: ~ .. :::'
• '>.-."..0-. II
'--'" ,
Ii , Iii I ~ It-.·· It I iii
' , ' . -.,' --
> \llli il
:c;: Iii! h! \11[ ,I ' ,I!I ' ", , " . , ,
. !I hi ~\ III ~:'li
"
r~ !I ~ull J~~_ .:', ' II
.. ~ ,il Fr .:; I
:' I'll
f I~
~
.~.~ .... u ,
~ , ,
"-... , ,
"-... , ,
I
I
., I
~
,) ~ [k.~""~, .',n m
-----%1
I TT L
I
r i'Wf --I , , I I
IWf;k ' , I II '1
.!:
:,.-: ~
. -
!OOII.LlfWAllllll'fl lllO_
,~::. ,"", , 5 1!
I
I
T ::;
I r:r ;I/: I
,
, 1:;'[,'.' , ,
II II
~.:::: i .:
~::t.~
J
II
f • ~:l::; ,.[%
I
:,: l..:' -!!
J
~ ;,;d--,J
,
~~ ,
.J-"'!!
~ ~.
i~ ·1; I:
il
I
I
'" ,
'"
, ~ -s , .
I !
I I
-I , iill :: "1 , lit ,
,
i .
~
I
:ri
!rl
~ ..
Z
II ~
=
'"
..
<
~ I , 0
I
i I !
I ; !
STATION 57
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT 3
DATE: January 22,2016
--
MARY . MCGRATH
..::.<:;.
PROJECT: Replacement Fire Station No. 57 and future Storage Building
DESCRIPTION:
The City of San Rafael and the County of Marin, jointly, propose to replace the existing Fire
Station No. 57 at its existing site. The County of Marin is the property owner and the City and
County are sharing the cost to reconstruct the fire station. Upon completion, the City will
lease the fire station from the County.
The existing site address is 3530 Civic Center Drive. The fire station site is adjacent to the
Frank Lloyd Wright's landmark Civic Center building, however, Fire Station 57 is a non-
contributor to the Marin County Civic Center National Register District because it was; 1)
constructed after the period of significance (1960-1970); and 2) was not designed by Frank
Lloyd Wright. Because Fire Station 57 is not a contributor to the Marin County Civic Center
National Register District, it has been determined that demolishing it will not be an adverse
effect (significant impact) on the historic property (historical resource). When the Marin
County Civic Center National Register District was created only the Hall of
Justice/Administration Building and the Post Office were found to be contributors to the
district.
The proposed 9,597 SF, two-story fire station will house five on-duty fire fighters in a 24-hour
shift. Three on-duty firefighters are assigned to the existing station. Medic 53, currently
located at Fire Station 53 will be relocated to this station to improve medical response times
to the north area ofthe City. This will increase on-duty staffing at this location from three to
five. The shift duty is a 48-hour schedule resulting in a shift change every other day. 100n-
site parking spaces are provided to accommodate this shift change.
The core facilities of the station (kitchen, dining, dayroom, restrooms, fitness room and
apparatus support spaces) have been designed to accommodate six on-duty personnel in the
event that additional staffing would be required to serve this location and to allow for staff
training.
The Fire Station includes the following elements:
• Three-drive-through apparatus bays;
• Apparatus support spaces including a workshop, medical storage and dean-up room,
turnout storage and related janitor facilities;
• North Area Medical Supply Cache
STATION 57
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION
• Public lobby, accessible restroom and station office;
• Kitchen, dining, dayroom and laundry room;
• Private sleeping quarters with unisex restrooms;
• And, mechanical, electrical, communications rooms.
A second building is planned for the rear of the site. This is planned as an 800 SF storage
building and the date that is will constructed is not known at this tim-e.
The entire parcel encompasses 66.55 Acres. The affected area proposed for development is
located in the South end of the parcel and is approximately 36,104 SF (0.83 acres). A portion
of the site area intended for development includes a designate wetland (.25 acre). As
a part ofthe project, this wetland area is proposed to be relocated to a northern
portion of the site. The actual relocate location is stili being determined.
In the area of development, the existing paving, lighting and buildings on the site will be
demolished and the site will be redeveloped with concrete and asphalt paving, site lighting,
above grade fueling, emergency generator with enclosure, landscaping, retaining walls,
fencing and gates. A gravel training area is provided at the location of the future storage
building. Landscape areas will be utilized as bio-retention basins. A parking area with 10
parking spaces including_a van accessible parking space and loading zone is located on-site
with an accessible route to the station entrance from the parking area and the public
sidewalk. Two additional spaces are provided for trailer storage. The project landscaping is
deSigned to follow the City's landscape design requirements for drought tolerant plant
selection and low flow irrigation systems. Plan selection will be suitable to bio-retention
basins.
Off-site improvements include a new access apron and sidewalk replacement. The median at
the front of the station along Civic Center Drive will be modified to move the existing left turn
opening to align with the new apparatus bay location. A keep clear zone will be stripped in
front of the apparatus bay apron along the Civic Center Drive frontage; and other
miscellaneous off-site improvements adjacent to the project will be completed as a part of the
work.
, , ,
IXHIBIT 4
MARIN COUNTY clvrc CENTER
MAS T E R DES I G N G U I D"E LIN E S
Master Design Guidelines
Summary Table
ROYSTON HANAMOTO ALLEY 8. ABEY
Mark Cavagnero Associates
Whitlock & Weinberger Transportation Inc.
Horton Lees Brogden Lighting Design
Kate Keating Associates Inc.
FINAL REPORT
December 20, 2005
" " / MARIN CIVIC CENTER MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES SUMMARY TABLE
GUI9ELlNE · "' i
SITE ORGANIZATION This section identifies issues that relate to the overall organization of the site to include view
corridors; pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular circulation; and parking capacity. Guidelines
include the following (See Section 3 for further details):
A. View Corridors 1. Where views from the Civic Center buildings to the east and south are obstructed due to
tall trees, replacing the trees with smaller species should be considered. (This must be handled
with care; a thorough tree planting master plan is required.)
2. . Undesirable views of Highway 101 from the Civic Center buildings should be mitigated
with buffer and screen planting along the site's western edge. Care must be taken, however,
to protect the view from the highway back towards the buildings.
B. Pedestrian Circulation l. Sidewalks along primary and secondary streets are preferred site-wide in order to
strengthen connections between buildings and recreational features on the site. Signage and
nighttime lighting should also be included. Sidewalks will improve overall pedestrian safety
and access to alternative parking lots for events.
2. A paved walkway of a minimum 12' in width that circies the lagoon entirely should be
completed per Frank Lloyd Wright's original plan. Signage and nighttime lighting should also
be included. Width and material should be consistent.
3. Pedestrian access to the undeveloped area in the northeast corner of the site is encour-
aged. Paths should be adequately signed for wayfinding and formalized to the degree nec-
essary to protect sensitive habitats. Habitat control fences will be necessary to protect sensi-
tive wetland areas. Paths should typically be approximately 4 -6' wide.
4. Existing trails on the site mayor may not be formalized. based on the adjacent natural
conditions at the discretion of the County. If formalized, trail width and materials should be
consistent and determined on a case by case basis.
C. Bicycle Circulation l. Civic Center Drive and other primary streets should have striped bike lanes and should
meet all City, County and State standards.
2. Bicycle access via bike paths or multiuse paths throughout the open space areas is en-
couraged. Care should be taken in designing these paths to avoid user confiicts and safety
problems. Coordination with relevant County agencies, City of San Rafael plans (inciuding
the Northgate Promenade), and interested citizen groups is encouraged.
Please Note: This table only shows guidelines. Please refer to the relevant section for full information, background and implementation of the specific guideline.
MARIN CIVIC CENTER MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES SUMMARY TABLE
GUI DELINE
D. Public Transportation 1. The County is committed to enhancing public 'and alternative modes of transportat ion to
and from the Civic Center. Future transportation planning efforts should emphasize options
other than the use of private vehicles.
2. Bus shelters ore encouraged on the Civic Center campus and should be designed specifi-
cally for the site.
3. Additional bus service to the Civic Center for cultural events (evenings and weekends)
and access to the library is encouraged. Coordination with and support of the SMART project
and station at the Civic Center is encouraged ..
BUILDINGS AND ARCHITECTURE This section identifies issues that relate to the buildings and architecture of the site including
guidelines related to context. function. and visual impact. Guidelines include the following
(See Section 4 for further details):
Context
A. Siting l. Integrate the building with the site by working with the topography to create an environ-
ment tha t allows the campus to be seen as a composite whole.
2. Site the building t o maintain a sense of open space throughout the campus while pre-
serving as much contiguous outdoor space as possible.
3. Where parking is necessary. it shou ld be sited with sensitivity so as not to obscure the
sense of open space or diminish the presence of the buildings.
B. Orientation l. Integrate the building with the site by working with the topography to create an environ-
ment that allows the campus to be seen as a composite whole.
2. Site the building t o maintain a sense of open space throughout the campus whi le pre-
serving as much contiguous outdoor space as possible.
3.. Orient buildings. wherever possible. to conform to LEED (Leadership in En e rgy and Environ-
mental Design) standards to maximize ecological design efficiency and minimize energy.
C. Scale l. Scale buildings so as not to diminish the prominence of the Administration Build ing and
Hall of Justice on the site.
2. With respect to neighboring structures. scale buildings to avoid lorge-scale d iscrepancies.
D. Building Height 1. A new building should not be so tall as to overwhelm the Administration Building and Hall
of Justice. The height of a new build ing, (or portion of a building) will be determined by pro-
grammatic needs with the utmost core and 'se nsitivity to its surroundings.
Function
A. Entry Orientation l. Where possible. onent main building entries toword the arterial roadways of the site to
promote circulation efficiency throughout the campus.
2. The siting of the building takes precedence and shou ld be carefully considered per the
'context' guidelines before undertaking the placement of'entries.
3. Main building entries should be clearly distinguished from the rest of the structure to ensure
recognit ion and ease of access.
4. Organize building e[ltries to promote pedestrian circulation between buildings.
Please I' ': This table only shows guidelines. Please refer to the relevant secflor .. full information. background and implementation of the specific guld •. 2
'-. /
MARIN CIVIC CENTER MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES SUMMARY TABLE
~.
I GUIDELINE
B. Building Usage 1-Buildings should promote public activity throughout the site.
2. Public uses should be maintained on the ground level. wherever possible. to promote ac-
cessibility and street level activity.
3. Less active functions such as administrative, educational, non-profit, or similar uses should
be placed on the upper level where ver possible.
C, Parking Approach 1-Parking should be on site and easily accessible. but should not obscure the site's sense of
open space or diminish the presence of the buildings. Further discussion on parking lots is in
Section 5, Landscape and Site Element s.
2. Long, low forms are preferred in accordance with Frank Lloyd Wright's design principles
and the visual quality of the Administration Building and Hall of. Justice.
3. If required, parking structures shou ld be lined with program space, dense landscaping,
or a designed series of earth berms with plantings to conceal their appearance and use as
a non-occupied building. The feasib ility of underground parking struc tures , 'covered by land-
scaped park-like areas or new buildings, shou ld be explored.
4. Parking fields and parking structures should be designed to be environmentally sensitive,
minimizing hardscape and built structures while maximizing open space.
Visual Impact
A. Form 1-Use fewer forms to present a simpler and "quieter" effect to enhance the beauty of the
surroundings.
2. Long, low forms are preferred in accordance with Frank Lloyd Wright's design principles
and the visual quality of the Administration Building and Hall of Justice.
3. Do not use forms that visually cha llenge the topography but rather allow the building
forms to be complementary to the landscape.
4. Emphasize formal clarity of the building by maintaining asimpJe palette of materials.
B, Roof Treatment 1-Roof types that are larger, simpler. visually quiet, and formally cohesive are preferred.
2. Avoid roof types that appear smal le r and visually busy, and might be interpreted as resi-
dential in scale.
3. Roof types should be differentiated from the existing landmark buildings to avoid mimicry
and to protect the historic integrity of the landmark buildings. Refer to the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.
4. Roof treatments should be visually integrated into the overall architectural concept.
5. Incorporate the need for mechanical and electrical equipment into the building design
to avoid placing such items onto the roof.
6. Sustainability issues such as use of renewable energy and daylighting should be consid-
ered and incorporated into the design of the roof.
------
Please Note: This table only shows guidelines. Please refer to the relevant section for full information, background and implementation of the specinc guideline. 3
MARIN CIVIC CENTER MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES SUMMARY TABLE
GUIDELI NE
C. Walls and Openings L Treat exterior walls as light screens, wherever possible, to take advantage of natural day-
light and views to provide building occupants a connection between the indoor spaces and
the outdoors.
2. HarmQnize all necessary openings -doors, passages and windows -with good human-
scaled proportions.
3. Organize exterior wall openings to act sing ly or in a series, typically as light screens instead
of solid walls.
4. Exterior walls should not mimic the Administration Building and Hall of Justice, but may
be sympathetic in its intent as a screen to modulate daylight. Refer to the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for the Treatm ent of Historic Properties.
5. Buildings must respect any privacy issues with regard to nearby residential struc t ures.
6. Sustainability issues such as optimizing energy efficiency and use of daylighting should be
considered and in corporated into the design of the exterior envelope.
D. Exterior Walkways/Arcades 1. Exterior walkways and arcades should be of good human-scaled proportions and inte-
grated with the buildings.
2. If exterior walkways/arcades serve no functional and program purpose, as the Civic Cen-
ter arcades do, do not integrate them so as to mimic, copy or degrad e the landmark struc-
ture.
3. An arcade does not require arch forms , which in itself may be seen as mimicking. Refer to
the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Tr eatm ent of Historic Properties.
E. Materials 1. Eliminate the combination of different materials in favor of uniform materials as much as
possible to emphasize hierarchy and clarity.
2. Choose a simple material palette to express building continuity.
3. Materials should convey a sen se of substance and evoke a civic quality.
4. Use nattJ ral. non-reftective materials where possible to complement the landscape.
5. Sustainability issues such as recycled content and matenal origination' shou ld be consid-
ered in making material choices.
F, Color 1. Building colors should not compete with or otherwise dimin is h the visual character of the
Frank Lloyd Wright Administrative Building and Hall of Justice.
2. Building colors should follow Fr"ank Lloyd Wright's intent of relating the buildihg to the land-
scape.
3. Avoid bright colors so os not to clash with, compete with or otherwise diminish the existing
landmark structures.
------.. _--- ------------
Please Note: This table only shows guidelines. Please refer to the relevant section for full information, background and implementation of the specific guideline. 4
-/ MARIN CIVIC CENTER MASTER DES)GN GUIDELINES SUMMARY TABLE
GUIDELINE
G. Lighting L The overall feel of the open space, as a natural setting shou ld be respe cted, with security
and wayfinding/orientation lighting given precedence_ Further information is included in Sec -
tion 6, Landscape and Site Elements_
2, Buildings should have visually res trained and elegant lighting, and should be designed t o
be compatible and complementary with the landmark struc tures,
3. Exterior build ing lighting should be designed and shielded as necessary to avoid off-site
lighting and night sky pollution,
LANDSCAPE AND SITE ELEMENTS This section identifies issues that relate to the overall landscape and site elements, includ-
ing planting and irrigation, paving and surfaces, site furniture, fences and screening, riparian
environments, park and recreation areas, streetscapes, parking lots, lighting, signage and
wayfinding, Guidelines include the following (See Section 5 for more further details):
A. Planting and Irrigation L The existing Oak trees are to be augmented with additional Oaks whenever and wher-
ever possible. Oaks will serve as the "signature tree" for this landscape as they thrive on these
hills, are long-lived, and are appropriate to the site's cultural history_
2. Non-native trees and shrubs -espeCially those that are invasive, unsightly, and/or un-
healthy -should be replaced over time with species appropriate to the Oak woodland land -
scape.
3. Both deciduous and evergreen plantings should be selected to enhance the native Oak
woodland landscape and be appropriate in size and scale with respect to any adjacent his·
toric structures. For example, new planting should not interfere with views t o or from the Civic
Center buildings when they reach maturity,
4_ The present grassy ground cover is to be preserved and augmented with additional na-
tive seeding when necessary.
Streetscapes Planting and Irrigation L Primary streets, such as Civic Center Drive, Peter 8ehr Drive and the Avenue of the Flags,
should each have a c lear and consistent streetscape planting approach and design_ Plant
palettes, especially street trees, shou ld be devised for each primary street Formal street tree
p lanting is encouraged where appropriate. Cohesion and c lari ty in planting and materials w ill
enhance th e visitors' experience and improve wayfnding on t he site . Special attention shou ld
be paid to the protection of view corridors , While unity is desired, some breaks in street tree
plantings may be necessary to prese rve views,
2. Secondary streets, such as Judge Haley Drive, Armory Drive, and Vera Schultz Drive,
should also have a clear and' consist ent streetsc ape planting approach and design _ Because
these streets have less traffic and importance on the site, the street tree planting can be less
formal t han those fo r the primary st ree ts, However, deSigning a planting palette for each is
encouraged in order to guide future im p ro vements,
Please Note: This table only shows guidelines. Pleas e refer to the relevant section for full information, background and implementation of the speciflc guideline, 5
MARIN CIVIC CENTER MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES SUMMARY TABLE
GUIDELINE
Building Entries, Courtyards and Patios 1. As is currently the practice. highly ornamental plantings are appropriate for the building-
relat ed landscapes of the Marin County Civ ic Center buildings including interior courtyards
such as the patio adjacent to the cafeteria and the former exercise courtyard of the original
jail. These landscapes should reference Wright's historic plans whenever possible and appro-
priate and should include a balance of deciduous and evergreen plants. Where the exterior
of the building meets the natural ground plane. plantings should be mature and appear to be
part of the natural landscape.
2. The entry lahdscapes of the Veteran's Memorial Auditorium and the Exhibit Hall should
be enhanced and improved with additional appropriately scaled plantings. This would also
enhance wayfnding for visitors to these venu es.
3. Planting adjacent to any future development -at entries. in courtyards. etc. -should be
contemporary in nature and appropriate in scale. color. and texture for the new architecture.
It should not attempt to match or mimic existing plantings on site.
Park Areas 1 . The irriga tion in the Lagoon Park area should be upgraded for efficiency and ease of
maintenance.
2. Perimeter tree planting to define th e edge of th e si te and t o sc reen the park from adj a-
cent neighborhoods shou ld be maintained and enhanced .. Replacement trees in the law n
areas must be able to tolerate lawn watering and should provide .as much shade as possible.
Trees along the site's perimeter, away from the lawn area, may be Oaks or other natives t hat
do not require or tolerate irrigation or underst ory planting. A balance of deciduous and ever-
green species is desired.
B. Paving and Surfaces
Primary Pedestrian Connections 1. Existing sidewalks should be made as consistent as possible in terms of design. moterial,
color and finish.
2. The preferred material for primary pedestrian routes is standard gray concrete with a
consistent medium broom finish. Where the route is d irectly adjacent to historic structures and
"TaHesin Red" paint color has traditionally been used on the paving. it is recommended that
integrally colored or stained concrete be used in Heu of surface paint.
Secondary Pedestrian Connections 1. County-sanctioned pedestrian pat hs should be forma lized where doing so would not con-
fl ic t w ith adjacent uses. Th is will increase a Ccess to va rious si te amenities.
2. For informal pathways where ADA compHance is not required, t he preferred surface
material is decomposed granite (with or without stabilizer) or sm all diameter granular aggre-
gate. Where conditions require additional stability and durabiHty. concrete or asphalt may be
appropriate.
Please Note: This table only shows guidelines. Please refer to the relevant section (qr full information, background and implementation of the specific guideline. 6
" ,
MARIN CIVIC CENTER MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES SUMMARY TABLE
GUIDELINE . ,
Street Paving and Surfaces l. Asphalt paving with concrete curbs for primary and secondary streets is preferred.
2. In particular, the Avenue of the Flogs should be repaved with asphalt. lit is understood
that the Marin Center Master Plan will address further design issues of the Avenue of the Flags.
While certain details on the Avenue of the Flags may change as a result of the Master Plan, it
is desired that t he overall look and feel of the street be consistent with that of other streets on
t he Civic Center campus.)
Special Landscape Features l. Paving for outdoor courtyards adjacent to historic struc t ures should be histori cally appro-
priate and of the highest quaMy available. Painted or exposed aggregate concrete surfaces
sho uld be replaced over time with integrally colored concrete, Examples include the outdoor
area adjacent to the cafeteria and the outdoor area at the south end of the Administration
Building.
2. Paving and surfaces of new special landscape features a d jacent to new architecture
should match in spirit with the new building and be site appropriate. Paving materials should
be generally neutral and of t he highest quality. Pav ing and surfaces in these cases should
support a unified view of the overall campus whenever possible, but may be contemporary
materials and treatments as is appropriate for new development.
3. New buildings on the campus with re lated outdoor areas such as courtyards or patios
should use the Civic Center's standard furnishings whenever possible. When this approach is
not appropriate,. the new building should establish site furniture standards specific to the ar-
chitect ure. These pieces should also be resp ectful of the overall setting and character of the
campus. .
C. Site Furniture
Park Areas and Lagoon Perimeter 1. It is recommended ·that all site furniture in Lagoon Park and the landscape surround-
ing the Lagoon be replaced with high quality, easy to maintain, durable pieces consistent
throughout the campus. These pieces should become campus standards for park-like set-
tings.
2. Benches, t ables, t rash receptacles and any other desired site furniture should be of similar
design, color, and materials. Please see recommendations below.
3. The design of the furn iture should be site appropriate and considerate of the historic
buildings on the site. The use of the "Taliesin Red" as an accent color should be considered
depending on th e furniture's location but is not required.
Courtyards & Patios l. Outdoor furn iture for spaces re lated to the Administration Building a nd the Hall of Justice
should be consistent. Further study on hi sto ric information regard ing Frank Lloyd Wrigh t's origi-
nal intent could'be done in order to choose an appropriate standard for these spaces. Other-
wise, the campus-wid e st andard site furniture sho uld be us ed.
Please Note: This table only shows guidelines. Please refer to the relevont section for full information, background and implementation of the specific guideline. 7
MARIN CIVIC CENTER MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES SUMMARY TABLE
GUIIl)ELlNE
D. Fences and Screening 1. It is preferred that permanent chain link fencing be .used as little as possible in the public
park and recreation areas of the campus. When it is necessary. black vinyl coated fences are
preferred for durability and aesthetics.
2. All fences should be planted with shrubs and vines wherever possible.
3. Planting barriers including trees may be appropriate where Civic Center property abuts
residential neighborhoods to provide a visual screen [for example. as currently exists along
Madison Ave.). Any possible future development on the campus should consider and address
these issues.
E. Riparian Environments: The Creek, l. Enhance. protect and restore riparian habitats on the Civic Center site to the highest
Wetlands and Lagoon degree possibl e .
2. Provide as many interpretive and educational opportunities for Marin residents in these
riparian areas as is feasible.
3. Improve water quality of the lagoon: explore sustainable solutions for water filtra t ion.
F. Park and Recreation Areas 1. The preferred appro ach is to complete the loop around the entire lagoon w ith p arkland
as originally envis ioned. The path along the lagoon should be considered a primary pedes-
t ri an route and enhanced accordingly . Site f umishings should be upgraded per the guide-
lines above. Lig hting should be improv ed for safety and nighttime ambiance. Signage and
wayfinding should be clear and encourage visitors.
2. Ne w park areas may be developed on-site in t he fu t ure. Such development should con -
nect seamlessly with the existing park lands per Wright's original design. While the n e w park
areas may differ in character from Lagoon Park. it is desired that new parks have adequate
transitional space between landscape types in order to enhance the cohesive quality of the
campus. For example. the open space in the northeast corner of the site may be enhanced
with improved access to the public. The access points to this more natural landscape should
be cl early connected to the existing park areas. but they db not need to match the pastoral
design character of Lagoon Park.
Please Note: This table only showS guidelines. Please refer to the relevant section for full information. background and ir(lplementation of the specific guideline. 8
MARIN CIVIC CENTER MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES SUMMARY TABLE
GUIDELINE .
G. Streetscapes l. Concrete sidewalks adjacent to primary and secondary streets are preferred. In par-
ticular, Civic Center Drive between Armory Drive and the Avenue of the Flags should have a
concrete sidewalk along its eastern edge of no less than 6' in width. See section 5.3 on pav-
ing above far further details.
2. Streets should have adequate night lighting for vehicles and pedestrians to enhance safe-
ty and in order to improve the site's accessibmty during evening events. Civic Center Drive,
the Avenue of the Flags and Armory Drive are of particular concern. Lighting fixtures and
design for streets should be consistent site-wide. See section 5.10 on lighting for further details.
3. Site signage should be easy to see and understand in order to enhance wayfinding and
improve accessibility. See section 5.11 on signage and wayfinding below for further details.
4. All intersections should be appropriately striped for pedest rian crossings; curb-cuts and
other appropriate measures should be taken to ensure d isabled access.
5. The County shou ld consider striped bike lanes on primary streets, particularly Civic Center
Drive, in order to encourage cycling. See section 3.3 for further information on bicycle circu la-
tion.
6. Street trees are encouraged as they define edges and beautify the site. Highlighting the
same tree on a single street is also preferred in order to add order and clarity to the campus.
Special attention should be paid, however, not to obstruct view corridors with new street tree
planting. See section 5.2 on planting for further details.
Please Note: This table only shows guidelines. Please refer fo"the relevant section for full information, background and implementation of the specific guideline. 9
MARIN CIVIC CENTER MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES SUMMARY TABLE
GUIDELINE
H. Parking Lots 1. All existing parking lots on the Civic Center campus should be redesigned to incorporate
bioswales to capture and treat run-off on-site wherever possible. These swales should run in
between rows of parked cars and be planted with species specifically chosen for their water
filtration abilities.
2. Existing parking lots should also be densely planted with shade trees. Soil fertility and irnga -
tion strategies must be devised in order to promote sustained health and growth of trees in
such harsh environments.
3. The terraced parking areas west of the Administration Building should be improved by
planting vines to cover the large expanses of the concrete walls.
4. Planting for lots that may host the farmer's market should be controlled so that the market
would not be negatively impacted.
5. Where possible, existing lots should be repaved with permeable surfaces to reduce
stormwater .run-off.
6. Parking lot lighting should be enhanced for safety. See seCTIon 5.10 on lighting for further ,.
d e tail s.
7. All new lots on the site should strictly adhere to the sustainable design practices listed
above. The feasibility of underground parking, covered by landscaped park-like areas or
new buildings, should be explored.
8. The feasibility of installing solar panels In shade 'structures over parking areas should be
explored.
I. Lighting
Functional Criteria 1. Provide adequate light for safety and security. Two main lighting factors that reinforce a
sense of safety and 'security are adequate horizontal illuminance at the ground for navigation
of pathways, and adequate vertical luminance at surfaces such as building forms, building
entries, people, signage and planting to provide visual context.
2. Create a strong nighttime identity. Establish a hierarchy of illuminated site features, such
as the spire on the Administration Building, where brightness, color, and coverage can indi-
cate degree of significance and focus.
3. Use lighting to promote wayfinding. Illuminate gateways and vertical surfaces to provide
context for pedestria ns and dnvers. Integrate lighting systems with signage.
4. Address maintenance issues such as standardizing lamp types as much as possible, maxi-
mizing accessibility of fixtures for easier repair and re-Iamping, optimizing lamp life , cost, and
energy efficiency, and minimizinQopportunities for vandalism.
Please . ; This table only shows guidelines. Please refer to the relevant sectiol full information, background and implementation of the specific guk ~. 10
-'.... ~' ~.' MARIN CIVIC CENTER MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES SUMMARY TABLE
Design Criteria and Approach
J. Signage and Wayfinding
Gateway Feature
GUIDELINE
1. Tile scale, form, color, and spacing of lighting elements should be cohesive campus-wide
and compatible w ith the historic design precedents and with the simp le, and timeless designs
of other site elements such as planting, architecture, and signage.
2. Site lighting fixtures located near historic structures must be respectful of the historic styled
designs and site lighting frxtures used e lsewhere should be simple, timeless, and cohesive
throughout possible future development areaS. This concept of a "family of fixtures" should be
applied to the major open spaces. .
3. The color of light throughout the Marin County Civic Center should be consistent with
only slight variations in the color of the light source, which may be considered appropriate for
distinguishing adjacent areas of different functions. To maintain this historic color variation,
we recommend using warm colored 3006 Kelvin compact fiuorescent light sources. All light
sources should have the highest color rendering properties available to enhance the quality
of the nighttime experience.
4. The Area Brightness Lighting Diagram contained in this section summarizes the overall de-
sign approach. Each possible future project should provide smooth transitions between zones
of different light intensities. Zones of varying levels of brightness based on the d iagram should
be implemented. The lighting solution shou ld provide an appropriate balance of ligh t and
level of comfort, with the .aCtual quantity of ligh t (I.e. number of footcandles) as a guideline.
Special attention should be paid to providing a visually comfortable transition from one area
to the next.
5. To facilitate seasonal lighting and special events, the infrastructure of each possible future
development should include power for the installation of temporary lighting.
6. The existing historic hat-shaped fixtures, placed 60' on center, do not provide a uniform
coverage of the pathways, where vertical illumination on pedestrians falls off in between light
fixtures. It is recommended that a higher light pole with the same fixture head style and pro-
file be considered for greater vertical and horizontal illumination coverage along pedestrian
pathways.
7. A reconstructed custom hybrid fixture design that represents the original historic fixture
concept and overall profile yet with modernized fixture optics and lamp technology is recom-
mended. The use of ceramic metal halide technology is preferred for roadway and street
lighting.
1 . The blue roof and gold-leafed spire are. so distinctive and well-known that gateway en-
hancements are not functionally necessary at the intersections of Civic Center Drive with San
Pedro Road and the Avenue of the Flags.
2. Gateway features would nevertheless add richness to the site and "announce" the de-
sign character of the landscape improvements and signage that visitors will encounter.
3. . Gateway features would likely combine signage with landscape enhancements.
Please Note: This table only shows guidelines. Please refer to the relevant section for full information, background and implementation of the specific guideline. 11
MARIN CIVIC CENTER MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES SUMMARY TABLE
GUiLlELlNE
Primary Vehicle Directional l. These should be sized for readability at the nominal 25 mph speed limit along Civic-Cen-
ter Drive. They would typically be placed at the in tersections with all public roadways, and, in
some instances, at advance locations as well.
2. Upgrades to existing directional signs to the Marin Veterans' Auditorium an d Exhibit Hall
complex wou ld essentially replicate existing sign copy.
3. New directional signs at the roadways to the Administration Building and Hall of Justice
"overpasses" would identify each building entrance and the principal public destinations it
serves most directly.
Secondary Vehicle Directional l. Secondary directionals are used where slower speeds permit readability of smaller copy.
Generally, they also display fewer dest inations.
2. Existing secondary signs at t he Marin Ve terans' Memorial Auditorium and Exh ibit Hall com-
plex shou ld be upgraded.
3. New signs shou ld be placed along Peter Behr Drive , Judge Haley Drive and Vera Schultz
Drive to direct visitors to the parking zone nearest the build ing entrance that leads most di-
rectly to their destination.
Pedestrian Directionals l. Pedestrian-scale wayfinding should be provided along the paths of travel from the Admin-
istration Building and Hall of Justice and east parking lot to appropriate building entries, and
t h roughout the Marin Center.
Pedestrian Orientation Maps l. A few strategically placed maps will give many visitors a helpful overview of the si t e.
(Some people cannot make the association between a scaled representation and the physi-
cd world. Wayfinding sho uld therefore not rely exclusively on orientation maps.)
2. Potential map locations include the tra nsit stop on Civic Center Drive, the Administration
Building and Hall of Justice parking lots, and key pedestrian nodes at the Marin Center. These
maps should include only the destinations and information necessary to guide most visitors.
The more complex a map, the more intimidat ing and confu sing it can be.
Building Entry Identification l. It will be critical to "label" each public entrance to the Administration Building and Hall of
Justice conspicuously (i.e. -A/B/C or North/Central/South). Each label should be augmented
by a directory of primary public destinations (Courts, Jury Assembly Room, Traffic Citations et
01).
2, Public transit syst ems typically have their own, distinc t signage and graphics, together
with stand.ards for their use, and this may be t he case for SMART. However, because of the
C ivic Center's unique, historic character, SMART signage should, if possible, have site-specific
'structural supports and/or "framing."
Please Note: This table only shows guidelines. Please refer to the relevant section for full information, background and implementation of the specific guideline. 12
'.~ MARIN CIVIC CENTER MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES SUMMARY TABLE
GUIDELINE
Typeface 1. The typeface Fu turo is currently used throughout the Administration Building , Hall of
Justice and Marin Veterans' Memorial Auditorium. Futura's circular (or apparently circular)
letterforms are uniquely appropriate to complement Wright's use of circles and circular arcs as
design motifs. Fu turo is theref ore the recommended typeface for future signage.
Copy Size l. The cap height (the size of a capital/etter measured vertica ll y) for p rim ary directional signs
a lon g C ivic Center Drive should be 4" to 4.5."
2. The cap height for directional signs along secondary roadways and entry drives should
be 2.5" to 3.5". Because Futuro has unusually extended (wide) letterforms, signs will be cor-
respondingly wid er to accommodate th e typeface without reducing cap heights or digitally
condensing the copy.
Amount of Copy l. Wherever possible, directional signs should have a maximum of three lis ted destinations.
Drivers don't typicall y have time t o p roc ess more infonna tion than that, and the more destina-
tions displayed on a sign, the less attention each w ill get.
Overall Size ). Size as necessary to ·display' the copy a t the indicated cap height and to provid e an ad-
equate border zone all around.
2. Sign panels should generally be wider than they are high to minimize multiline messages.
4'6" is an optimal overall height. The lowest copy on a sign panel should be )'0" to 1 '6" above
finish grade to keep the copy within a driver's line of vision and to prevent being b locked by
ground cover.
Changeability l. Most destinations at the Marin County Civic Center campus are unlikely to change over
time. Where change is a possibility, the use of modular directional signs which simplify copy
updates should be considered .
Placement l. Vehicular directionals should be placed as close to th e street as possible without disrupt-
ing sightlin es or interfering with underground utilities.
2. Placement should also take into account adjacent trees, shrubs and ground cover.
3. Irrigation heads should be directed away from sign panels to avoid the buildup of a lka-
loids fro m repeated spraying.
Lighting l. All principal wayflnding features should have dedicated external illumination un less ambi-
ent light levels are high enough to provide the necessary visibility.
Please Note: This table only shows guidelines. Please refer to the relevant section for full information, background and implementation of th e speCific guideline. 13
MARIN CIVIC CENTER MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES SUMMARY TABLE
GUII:lELINE
Design Considerations 1. All components of t he hierarchy should employ the Futuro typeface and utilize the Civic
Center color palette -sands tone beige. blue a nd Ta liesin Red -and all components shoul.d
refiect a common design vocabulary.
2. That design vacabulary. however. should not mimic the Civic Center architecture. In-
stead. it should be campatible in a general way. using curv<;>d forms to soften massing. and
horizontal rather than vertical proportions whenever possible.
3. If design motifs or details are incorporate d inta the signage. they should be placed on
th e edges of a sig n panel and/or the support structure so that they dan't obtrude on th e "liv e
area" reserved for copy.
4. Borders between colors or materials should be articulated by a reveal. a trim piece. a
change in plane or some similar device.
Please Note: This table only shows guidelines. Please refer to the relevant section for full information. background and implementation of the specific guideline. 14
EXHIBIT 5
81 1 :J , let : 14 !! Meeting Notes
FROM:
MEETING:
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:
Raaj Patel, Project Manager
Frank Lloyd Wright Civic Center Conservancy (FlWCCC) Meeting
January 27th , 2016
9:00 a.m.
Marin County Civic Center -Board of Supervisor Conference Room 324 A
3501 Civic Center Drive, San Rafael, CA
Cristine introduced the Fire Station 57 project to the Civic Center conservancy team. She
e'mphasized the collaborate efforts that have taken place to develop the current conceptual design.
Mary presented the conceptual design for Fire Station 57. She stated that her team followed the
design principles from the Civic Center guidelines. She stated that the median on Civic Center will
need to be modified. Golf Road will betor emergency access only.
Mark Schatz suggested that the curve of the roof be moved forward so that some of the roof could be
seen over the apparatus bay. Committee members liked the openings in the roof.
Mark liked the Red band at the building entrance in . Design Progression # 1, Committee members
suggested to making it Navajo Red to match the Civic Center color palette .
. Committee members liked the massing and shape of the final Design Progression # 4. They did not
like to color shown in the rendering. Would like to suggest matching the post office (original color not
the current faded color) or Civic Center.
Mary requested color speCifications from County for the Civic Center.
Joan Brown did not like the four square windows at 2nd floor. She suggested using round or curved
windows. It was noted that this would mimic the Civic Center and thus would not be appropriate
design.
Mark did not like the small windows on the first floor adjacent to the entrance. He suggested having a
few larger windows at the bottom elevation. Other committee members liked the small windows,
Committee wanted SREF team to submit color boards for review and approval to FLWCCC.
Question was asked if design of apparatus doors took into consideration future capacity/size of fire
engines. Mary stated that they design fire stations taking into consideration Caltrans standards for
vertical clearance of vehicles for underpasses which is 13' -6" Apparatus doors are 14' x 14'.
Bill Schwarz did not like the solid wall at the North-West entrance to rear parking lot. Fire Chief
explained that there will be a gate and fence that are currently not shown. Mary stated that due to site
constraints we cannot landscape the adjacent area. It was suggested to plant few trees on the
adjacent County land. County was open to this suggestion.
Fire Chief Chris Gray informed the team that there will be an Open House at Fire Station 57 on
January 27 th , 2016 Page-l-
Wednesday 2/1 0/16 from 5.30pm to 6.30pm and another open house at Fire Station 52 on Tuesday
2/09/16 from 5.30pm to 6.30pm. Both Fire Station projects will be highlighted at each station.
FLWCCC unanimously approved that:
1. The board supports the current design for the new Fire Station 57.
2. SREF team to use color scheme that is consistent with the Civic Center.
3. SREF team to take into consideration other minor modifications suggested.
January 27'h, 2016 Page-2-
-'
EXHIBIT 5
Meeting Notes
FRbM:
MEETING:
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:
Raaj Patel, Project Manager
Frank Lloyd Wright Civic Center Conservancy (FLWCCC) Meeting
January 27th , 2016
9:00 a.m.
Marin County Civic Center -Board of Supervisor Conference Room 324 A
3501 Civic Center Drive, San Rafael, CA
Cristine introduced the Fire Station 57 project , to the Civic Center conservancy team. She
emphasized the collaborate efforts that have taken place to develop the current conceptual design.
Mary presented the conceptual design for Fire Station 57. She stated that her team followed the
design principles from the Civic Center guidelines. She stated that the median on Civic Center will
need to be modified. Golf Road will beJor emergency access only.
Mark Schatz suggested that the curve of the roof be moved forward so that some of the roof could be
seen over the apparatus bay. Committee members liked the openings in the roof.
Mark liked the Red band at the building entrance in . Design Progression # 1. Committee members
,suggested to making it Navajo Red to match the Civic Center color palette.
,Committee members liked the massing and shape of the final Design Progression # 4. They did not
like to color shown in the rendering. Would like to suggest matching the post office (original color not
the current faded color) or Civic Center.
Mary requested color specifications from County for the Civic Center.
Joan Brown did not like the four square windows at 2nd fioor. She suggested using round or curved
windows. It was noted that this would mimic the Civic Center and thus would not be appropriate
design.
Mark did not like the small windows on the first floor adjacentto the entrance. He suggested having a
few larger windows at the bottom elevation. Other committee members liked the small windows.
Committee wanted SREF team to submit color boards for review and approval to FLWGCC.
Question was asked if design of apparatus doors took into consideration future capacity/size of fire
engines. Mary stated that they design fire stations taking into consideration Caltrans standards for
vertical clearance bfvehicles for underpasses which is 13' -6" Apparatus doors are 14' x 14'.
Bill Schwarz did not like the solid wall at the North-West eritrance to rear parking 101. Fire Chief
explained that there will be a gate and fence that are currently not shown. Mary stated that due to site
constraints we cannot landscape the adjacent area. It was suggested to plant few trees on the
adjacent County land. County was open to this suggestion.
Fire Chief Chris Gray informed the team that there will be an Open House at Fire Station 57 on
January 27 th, 2016 Page-l-
