Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission 2012-01-24 #2 Attachment 2AFFAcFjjvjFw3 San Rrp al Planning Commisston January 24, 2012 oiime o. "It ^l ,..•-. ......... ___. COUNTY CQ.UN. .U. ttx of AMAIN Vmlhx. ri Memory 5, 2012 DOU Im AP ew1uxaa VIA&MAIL AND U.S. MAIL ASSISTANT mawY muxee Mr. timid Tambrnhl, Senior Planner San Rafael City Han Ic,ahy Rimes 1400 Fifth Avenue - MorM°a.eve, Post Offim Box 151500 s....cA.°.mla.rv.. San Ramel, CA 94901 orad V,Nm°n Mural d"° Re. Sen Rffieel Airport Recrea Hmtal Faclll(y Noisy a.encn•�um Declaration of Residukrim M"°d"MW vel..ga Your Hie No's.: M05-01/UP050WED05-10 esA M."[II con - llmmw I. Ipn. SAIIIIIame Dear Mr. Treatments J..G fl°gerLa Sa,nemvmm.wd Sknlua This letter well followu on our tale hone conversation all res nattiest to Me above snoro,eu referenced drevelop out proposal 1 posa that also included your City Mee, MIN. &n.A MuUTF,lo sml.,h.d AUpmey Rob Epstein. recall w to you wish respect is the mayyation onv.rzs ration diamAt eters' ( eneu upon which this development Proposal - development proposal) proposed onear[ December - cemberperlyJAmT,OM pity nountya _ 2009. 2009. Th to sham Wth the the City the County's positlon ossa A"IMITRhcel. Awuw.,oAnw A.Si:.wT thent respect riledhat vlsr Ietae Federation city penning W the pmjon visa -vis the Declaration. However, s recent city correlationhearingthe least thingsowulretlthat rg* ex mused ct respect eprior, le rausatl same wnmsion wIM respect le the prior letter and Me Cpuntys positlon. dM bkI CSM c%100,HCM. 0,1,275 eemmdw apparently the staff report for planning ingme acteCity's that - a.RA lthe tireDecember28,2009 Ofter that the that Me County agreed agreed ill City's the pent MI the current ec0onloM yes lyo proposal preposmwosrNWith the ofthe 413adwlcpadwa 415 413 2 7 961 Declaration.A not 209lelma O This is nolmerth The December no position 415 413 3122 1 all With mr tasproposed I001 ar verWok thto wharedon.aprojeGasproposedwasrorwasnot- d7sl)arlrz2m cat onsistent with consis[en[wlM the DeGamdon. Second. the County Parks depatlment recently sant a IeXer to Me planning wracreaion arguably Inferring that the project was not consistent w9h the Declaration. IniM1is mgard I would like to point out [hat individuals or departments amfiated with the County may well have opinions In this mimed. However, areas the Dadaration was greutetl to the County as an entity, only the Board of Supervisors has authority to fake an official position and/or seekta - enforce Me Declaration, The Board of Supervisors has asked our office M clarify Me December 28, 2000 _ letter to reiterate that Me Gnu my of All takes no opsifion as to wM1edler the project as currently proposed h crime the allowed uses of the Declaration. San Rrp al Planning Commisston January 24, 2012 PD.20P2 However, l havealsobeen authorized to inform you that so lone as the proles remains precisely as currently proposed, the County will not challenge the project administratively or judicially based upon &a Declaration. Once again this does not mean Ihot the County agrees that the project is consistentwith the Declaration. It simply means the County will cwt be addressing or pursuing this Issue so long as the project remains as moorings proposed. I hope this addresses the concems we have discussed. Very Duly yours, wma L. Zalfloommi _ - Deputy County Counsel Cc: Supervisor Susan Adams Undo Dahl, Director Marks County Parks and Open Space_ A'fI'ACIMiHNT4 Fnvimnmeoml h resent, ENGINEERING CORP. Mamh 15, 2010 .John Company LampIMGGeeagay land lartme rdeno Outlined, CA 9460452/9 Stibied: Recapitalize to Comments for the Gslogyand hydrology sections of rhe San Rafael Aipurt Recraficand Facility Diastolic This letter responds to annnems on the Hydrology, Gwlogy and Soils section of 1W Dealt FP R lar the San Robust Airport Recreatem project. TNc concerns not anmeinod 10 alearn dated May 7, 2009. Tic following is our resracnse Is comments in order as they appeal' In the letter. Our identified! same was to revered to cortnnrnts 1, 2, ], 4, 6, 7 and It. Hy hOIG y Commemx—$raig Tanda ratni, May 7, 2009 Commend 1. Slgallieam Impacts. Comment notes that the pr jeot is located withen the 100 Yarn flood zone and tluis impacts should be significant. flasponsin Tho DEM does indicate ihat the project will Navaop•tentiWl sigh ming hplmlegio impacts to plating sweiares within We flood eons. Fit placing Of structure within the IOD yar floodplain zoneis specifically eddrcssed in insurer Hyd-2 on page It 30 of Ne IININ. Tic impact discussion dna oddness hooding Gum levet hung. Subsequent base analysis has shown tM1nt the levees art sound and not Wilt min mnhtlal which would potentially be susecti ihle in sasmia bulges. The DIIIR goes on to discussthat the Protect is nm emiahnding housing within the Zone, it aL makes plain that We Gry of San Rafael's municipal ends, which allows for the construction mousulsorisg las incomes within the 100 -year 0walplain, must comply with TEMA remained floodplain ordinances and policies ganiGcally, alligation Measure Ryd-2a eMndaRi compliance with P➢MA flooding proofing specifiwlions These discussions and others within the DEM make a solid case that are sigui em,w threshold IS watered but that the incorpommin and implementation of the recommended senescent coverage reduces these potentially afgoi0canl Means to a less than sgMfimnst tlnashold. Comment 2 NAVD vs. NGND. This comment notes that the DRIR uses NGVD vs. NAVD as the elevation standard and wondms about the methodology of this damn. Response: It should be stall that the vertical datum eased in the DRIB analysis does not oflnenethe love] ofsigmficase with regards to flooding impaots. The project evaluation and its identification of potentially significant impacts do not change whether We Inject uses the 1929 vertical damns or thea 1988 vntical datum. The correction between NGVD and NAVD is 0.815 meters or 2.67 feet on the project site. NAW is grater than NGVD, thus 4.0 NOVD is 6.67 NAVD. Be, 711A 1220Isidayed Cove Rd Suitt]0G it. Biehran6 U M807 L511gasailk c5leel GHtI E(acyzar(Sc UE4nm Son Rri Planning Cmnmissam January 24, 2012 ase Caunney Mach 15, 2009 Pegc2 Commuu 3. Levee and Pump Station Mamtemmme Thos common addresses the flat that the lose and thopump became needaa be maintained to provide sufficient Had peateotion Response: Qncata contacted the Maria funnly flood Control Depanmant m minim about the owsraft and maintenance responsibility of the levees and pump station At present Olte pump station and the majority of the levees surrounding the site ate in private ownership and are maintalnedbytheawvcr. A small section ofthe levels does belong to the family at the tip of the Airport numhoula Tim County maintains these levees oat of the general find with maintenmrco nursling Pr'imedly of mowing sad mspeation ofthe levers. 011ier than those acllvlliee, Marin County does not maintain any other pails of the sits -3 drainage oyatm a fic applicant wit have a large Meadow to malntaln me drainage system and vices on she ..considering the Intended Emiloydamagciftheydidnmt. Also, if the levees fat writer the punnp station docs not opiate, the damage caused by these actions will be contained ondie Applicaut's fluvatepropeny and not raped adjaccut Property owners. The potentially significant impact to the site is floating from a levee breach The normal states the there wool(] Act be emmagh area to evacuate if a Issue (much did occur. DBBismon and shows calculations that a lease broach would take approximately 45 mihmtes m2,5 limits to fill @¢site tesla, extant that a cur could not be used to evaarate flesito Givicuhheshortdistanae t6 higher humid, approximately 0.44 miles or 2,300 feet, rye bellies that there will be adequate time for an evacuation to occur ad elha in a motor vehicle at on film Comment 4, Evaluation Plan. The (nonlinear suggests that the lack of an evacuation plana an impact are an oversight ofthe DB1R Response: As previously stated in the response As Comment 3, the evaluation mute is appeox redilly 0.44 miles. A ear heading u2mile par lmnrwould be able to travel Wat dialance viilhin less than 15 mi their It will take over 45 area= for water to split tocding the parking area then another I and 15 minutes to make it impassable. Given the short distance And fine it world Oaks to get to high Searle wade not believe an evacnAlion plan is ucedusl as mihiantion for the less. than significant Flailing impacts. Comment 6. WaterQuality and Erosion Control Plan. 'fire crakes the point mat an erosion central was nut submitted as put of the FAIR. Response: TypicallyBra erosion cemml plan is contend dining hortative map submittal lot Oho project and is a typical estimative for a grating penin[ From the City. The project applicant will she base to submit the plan as pmt of the overall application to attain a 401 permit flnm the 121gionel Water Qlality Covttol Boats. Because of the interior drainage nulla of the site, (al all 01 the drainage most he Pllmped fiom the situ), drainage and Alarcon control tar the site is fairly straight mRvatd slid presents no Willieal problems for tis applicant. Aspire o'obtalving Permit from the Rational Water Quality Control Board, the applicant will have to propose and demmenum compliance will all applicablo State of California Beal Management Practices (MPs) and meet pcdormavce standards for the aetlinum deanInn basin sizing, Given the proposed land use type them are no known sp,oifuc wale' quellty slandads that the. project site will aav@'b comply with. Chneot regulations specify mitigation for bilateral mwfflawk and M[ Ubmmey Match 15,3009 Page reforms and mandate that all practical BMN shall be asset to address and airlines nor point source pollution Item flarpirweart site ConmwM7. Hadi in Impervious SnYrncCArn. 'Ilia common[ Indicate that the tribunal ladwi Ms changed to include a reduced impervious surace amu. Respo bau A dight reduction in mossevlou% surface arca would not have my significant impacts b the faojecl and therefore no additional analysis is required. Vermont 11. Solvents Slability or Levess. The let ar dated May 7, 2009 s1Mes'4he ➢C@ fails So madden the ability ofllm lawns to withstand wismdostaklna." Resrumam Inpick ]OttrapartorrebMm 10,2010,1011 C. lmmand Asswiate, Inc, Indiana that Say drilled@mc horsMln lv the levet at Nc pnyat silo. leeaabo Aolos paneheredxmdium nliBSilty Clay fill, moment stff, im the upper 6 to 7 W,, barbarism by soft Clay Bay Mud to the total depth ofharshn ss at 106 le I4.5 fat bier IM1c lop of levet. In n nearby horohule drilled inthe proposal mhkri, facility laation, the soft Clay Bay Mud eros found to extend to a depth a 27 fact tielow gmnnd snr Doe, at which depth veny stMandy Clay alluvium was pencaated. Th, alluvium was emission by Shale bedrock ata deplh of approximately 43 fact below burned surface. flew wit mid baAuck nationals are not siisceptibIttotbeaffe ofselamioallylndncedliqu,faction, The soft clay soils may amplify the gond shaking elleew doing severe around slaking and will ted t0 shake &r Inger periods than bedrock, but will not fail due to liquefaction alas of shear strength cartacriansaw by leer and salubad sand suits doing shag around shaking Based on Ibis, the levees should before edequably during earthquake induced ground sharing and the impact ofgiemically induced gond failure is less than significant. We most this is[tie information you burns at this tune. Should you requite additional information please GanF.mt an Undvaigncd. Sunteraly O J Sydn Tre P $59695 Ptiv pia/V'9"k of AydPologial WiV�I N. Hupkins�� SenicrGgiireenng Geologist Rat lesson Data wpua'a wwnvwnn A I FACIUMENT s Kraig Tambornini From: Daniel Murphy DMuryhy1@dtuGva.gav7 Sent: Monday, November 28, 201110 a] AM To: Kmiy Tambmnny Sabi Re: San Rafael Airport FED Ina phyla Thanks to, your prompt eata11 reply t, my letter xegatdvng the PEIR toy e SR A,7Fort tu develd¢emt proj¢C I had , ,re %seed c that c vaLfort raghtFare migrated £avis ,functional are,, If the 111palt to -e r the protect reopen uLee to epedHof c ; the TUR, andthat, at you have v mladed turn that the in or s1qiufhe f the airport i, t he pro ility ,£.c lamination toriginating £r the coastal onal a umente yirp, re at the aro out a that. yen r the e pr,pun e t]ou documented etch r ns >- Youtothconclusion cr instance roh I have ,ads n cin,ru mann tufadc, cnproperty). ldd , rrtotiy 1 ha far lhcr arta no rad £,r enae that would afirmly erce,al- they , .eznn antler Look to opr,par thorCC*R. TM1an ke Cuc you mosldea nth nn. ie1 Murphy, P Chtec Choy" Costa / Solaro O my Unit Uerkeley Cleanup Branch (510) 540-3992 » brute Timb,rlani <K,,ig.Tamhornlnibclty,£aanratacl.CTg>- 11/25/2011 35 PM >>> Daniel, When you have a moment, please advise whether my Nov. S, 2011 much l . edequaEly ,d,ntitind P informationresponding t s that airporteer might hav outamLytodpthen bnl1e1I the lnlunaat... in thn PNIR adequately pm.to,, t , macion that would be!sued re l aess,,oi. Plan,, adi if you would still mcvmust a Phase T assessment lar [lis sate. Thank you. kCs"q 'laobornia r,nPlanes, City of Sea Rafael, CCnuallity able 10facr nt 1400 11£th Ave./PO Box L1560 Can Nelael, CA 94901/9491'.-1560 Pbu e,: (415) 425-3092 Fax: (415) 455-3154 krnig.tambmnir0cityrecou ralael.ory h5'nn Najnel Plannirzy ConnlAxion Jai 24, 2012 ATIFACFMIENT6 — ERAFIN Asa A FIN Mauve MONAC✓, CA 94565 1 e' W29 35O4709:l07s137S684 I F...(9251 anmxo San Rated Airport, LLC January i, 2012 2167 A I net Francisco Rcaknord San haled. CA W901 Attention: btu Lunn Nibbi Subject: Phase I I{ vhohmmtnl investigation San depart Airport Ra:rcatiund Facility San passel, hdifrmia project No. M-209 Dear W Nibbi We have cotnplacd an ctrvbonmctM1sl Inbestie lian consisting of Plause I llnvlroninmad Site Assessment for the 9.1 -ore pmpody, within the boundaries of the San SAM Abpml, looatedin the City ofScn Rafael, (811Ponadu 'Ibemsudlsoftbe aim bis(myreviovand theregublorynevmw shore Union jorpollwanuts have slpg it lyhnpacted [be site to kneels that may requite repud6tbn. prefer, them are major sources of rantamitm[btt coolant on the adjacent prolhas that could migrate onto tine elle and adversely Impact thedevelopment of the property, as a rocncal(mwl f cihity. In our Invkcsimal opinion, an appropriate level of ingnhty has bear made into In'avions uses of We site consistent with goad commercial and customary practice In an chart to minimize liability, and no apparent evWencc or Indication of Recognized F.'nvironmearal Conditions lave been reveah;d. If yen have any questions all the Information in this IAll or ifrvecan be of fitdha astislanm,phsee contact as. vvytruitynurs, I" A. Santa, REAIs 1088 linvinamtrntal hnghtom &oma Sem Rufael Plossmag Commission ./ossuary 24. 2012 Hviwxmm�Ml rwlafx�r�/iRafesm Ynyxnrrl2armRwml Fmlli9r nn Rry{xrl Airyw/ HNVIRONMHN/AL /NW-STIOATIONRHPORT Proposed Recreational Fertility Sme RafaelAnpmY San Rafael, Cal(ornla l'MARRI RNVIRONMRNTA SITRA.AMMM' PMMIIW na-am TA OF CONTHNT.0 Paee A. GENERAL. A I o Vlav A-2 ogmfre A3 Appamli 2 A -A Sco eo(SuV= 2 A:5 SiW)Wa A A6 Eilelfrvxw ncc 4 A-7 Topography A A3 SiaGwIoMandHydrg1q Q A-9 Silvlkwop 5 A-10 Mlacmt Ln Um 6 All StmageTmlka 9 A-12 IiWioaNasolYolycplo[InxlNBipluaYlv(PCRs) 9 A-13 ltdimlim OMWWaage Oispo 10 6 9 .MSTORPRRVIBW 10 61 I I19mim1 RvokgmmN o! IFc YrQlccl Silo aryl Ihu Aiapml 10 0.2 Ae'ial Photoleaplw 10 C RN:COROREVIEW - 12 Cl Rcgahemy Agmoy R"mv 12 F2 COy alM Couoly Rapmds 15 PMMIIW na-am bmmnmou f romOg'al.. Repml v,m,mwe...�mmae�an+.w,,, afele;,00e Milp,OF GYXVT6NTS (Cuo lwm D. DISCUSSION E. CONMNYONS F. R COMMPNIN'1'IONS G. LIMITATIONS REWE CM 20 HGIIRRl- SI'IELOCATIONMAP I,IGu11E2- SMAERIALMMOW: nomgeapl,n ApP da A RVgJ URa MSeanLDnN App�B Ilhbrleal AedallTulo® plm �M,rawn-:on. u JKVMOto 7h[L MVM7TGA 7ION REPORT Proposed Recreational Facility Saint Rafael Airport San Rafael, California PNASE I ENVIRONMENTAL ST/'E ASSES.S'MEN'I' A. GENERAL A-1. lNernew This reportpweents thcresults of Phase f Environmental Site Assessment (HSA) for the proposed recreational 1ho ity (Project Site) within the San Rafael Aimed (Ahpon), located on the senth sale ofNodh Folk Oallmas mak, within the 1120 -acre prolieny of the San Ra[el Ahporl in the City of San Itafaej, California. A Site Location Map is shown on Figure 1. Tiro proposed rµcility consistsofappacsimatsly9,300 agnam itctof minor sports R;Idg. as wall as an randomsoccer pitch, a count up arca, and a paved parking area. This Phase I ESA centuries to and is gmrerally bawd on the gnidclmcy seep; and Unduadmus of the American Society for fes[ingand Materiels (ASTM) StandaN Pracd;e I4 1527-05, and is consistent with good commercial a1µ1 customary practice for envinaun tal investigation. A-2. Objet 'i be objective ofthis inves[igationwasto assess the Wrclihead orthe psceolmeorpneutially hmnrdous materials on-site and in the mu nMiate site vicinity tom past and/or pose d uses ofthe project Site. r,„e.,m. HM AY ExWnwmow nnvmgmfi Aoparl Xrcmvimml Psdaiiss lb(xlNrµwr AJ. Avinsourb The appmacn tried to mart the objective was to conduct it site oralk through and a she vicinity reconnairsunce, a review of reality available information d'' ussnns with was= aidlor owsow representative mid with Personnel at roguldory agencies, and an evaluation otlhc rule oblainal. A-4. Sci cof5etvlces To standardize environmental site asbraamarts his cownetcul red plate, AS"IM developed aadtra practius E 1527 for emlromnantal she assessments. The standard was later revisal at 2000 and again in November 2005; the late revision is doslgnated as E 1522-05. The rendered services are generally based on the guiddinos and definitions of due ASTM Madre k 1527 05 (draws ire Isaac), and mnfnn to the genmally accepted raluitements of the industry. The goal for this ESA was m klcmiry ienognaed envnnwitened uondinsts; Le., the presence or likely prasenne of any hazardous substances or peNdemn presents under conditions that indicate a past, existing or materlat board of release onto the pivpedy, or into the gond, groundwatmor surface outer of the property. Materials used for this ESA rely on information that is pMclical ymviervable, i.e., infnmation from a somec is a veteran that, when examiner, supplies relevant information without extraonllnary analysis of inrlevant data. further, this ESA relies on information that is mason rbly oarerininmble; i.e., publicly availdse, obtainable within r'aininable time and cool constraints, and prncNcally onsenvable. '[has"] rivedsopeofttrvices Nur ESA ureses flluw¢ ➢ A site recinnaissrnw to assess present site wnditious and to look for evidence of present or prat operations that uscor nmy have used potentially l arardous ma edids, including tetivities commsioniy associated with the storage of potentially IwzatNous materials. Silacondkbnsnvrlb ptmtograpbicallydobunimped, whereapplisable; ➢ Observation and recording of the nurseries of nigh power transmission lines and Imnvfrm , egisoNsmaso o Lkj mix/W lnml2xexx Hywrt Aeyarct ttaxmximmrPari(Y. 5'xn NJadNrpul Y Discussions with the current property ewer or his reproscreadve; ➢ A site vicinity reconnaissance to mrdies lire type ofbnswcsscs in the journa to site vtmiiity that may use town dolls substances; that in ourdndgnnonl in ay imine the Ste; Y A review oFseleated readily avnifable govmvmant agenole"s' winces totaled to the Pmencer ofpntentiellylrezaNmis coder'idh on the siteand the vicwtyofthe site. A review of Olen at the local governalued agencies to avers the earnest awl historical condition; at the Site and for selected imilhiss within dna fwed'wte ate vicinity. is A review of information to assess historieul land use and property development including bin not limited to readily available topographic mon, holiness dhnchalbs, and localbnllding and planning dumbnent moods; Y' An'arrow of Inf rtration mgaNing the surfm and subsurf conditions including the hydrogc l ogg regional groundwater impairments, soil type, and trimpsophy of the site and site vicinitynsfg inducted ref careg Y Data evaluation and roportpreps"flon. A-5. Sitelgatte Yivoughout this HSA,the following tennis am used rearoNinglY The "Project She" wicis to the proposed overall fulitydevcapmeen located on tic. wuth side of North pork Collins Clock, within the San Rattail Airport (Ahpmt),. in the CRY or San Romil, Marin County, Cahfari e; "immediate site vicinity" mfrs to parcels Ire nwhithely adducent to the Pitied Site; spcolOcally the lands occupied by the Airfoil. The royal Smith Ranch Ahpod, Marin Rauch Airport and San Refj Aigint Im beemcal intcashrogeably in this report; "Ste vicinity" refm to the area within approximately 'Fjmile radius of the YnnmlSite; and, the lens "huzardoos" Is used here in general amordwme with is usage in Title 22, Division 4.5, Chapter 10, Caliform Code of Regulations (CCR). The. terns. "Wanders tnalaiah" and "Iwtardoon raise" no used inmmhnng arblY. alta no legal distinction is installed benveenRe two turns as used Irerain. esws,mxx-nu EOWMM's'n"d 'xmm, ftR a, Napw,vlXxmoti®%YYaIDp .ti„Rl A/qml A-6. Site Ree onaivwoac Oa December 2, 2011 we performed a she feconasaie mu which included a walk-Ibmugh and photogalthing oftlw S¢e, as wall as ob9crVingsnammding areas. On the basis ofthe site Connaissance and review of terhad a documents, we Pattered the f0llowing site description. Pholoaaphs numbers l to. 8 show the genual she conditions. A-0. '[pure maul no lopogupbv mf the Site and the sm munding areas consist ofrebtivclyfdat bond. Figure3 Iawarmsa lopo"Ida, map of the She end the site vicinity. The Sha Iscurrcttly vacant and cal ly covered with maintained Kress and steed. The approximate :average sardine elevation of the She mages firm -2.0 ro 2.0 bet above Mean Sea Low] (MSL). The project Site 1s basically flue with an apprediable relbf A-8. Site Geolnmv and HVdromeolomv 'f he Airport she is beaded wthe northeasterly p aunt of the city afSan Rafael (see Figura I fursite location), the Ahpom occupbs has par them of land between and near the con fiance rflhe north and south Anks of6allinas Creek. a. O ologY The AhportisnWedabby ahalbw mdavd 1p0 maleruk That varies in thickness. ThefltHs underlain byllay Met, a relatively soli silly clay [bat is agaric -rich. '1'1reAzy Mnd varies in tbioknoss from Sur as duty feel. Beneath the Bay Mat arc stiff clay and firm alluvial deposits ova the bedrock. The mases of GII materials are unknown. A review of sone published doctweuts snggosts that [be Airport sire is underlain by Iioloeene alluvium consisting ofunconsoddated sandy clog gravelly clay, sandy. silt and silly gravel. About /, ofa mile went offse Airport site tie aauvul deposits am appmximalely 11 to 16 fret deep and are underlain by fractured and weathued Allstate which bebogs to the Cretaceous -age Franciscan assanblage, e,,,fm'N. nw-vy q ps SnvLwmmilnl /naifi%nNmi Reyvn IMyvetl N.xrcui®MYaelllil'. Ann F 1N'IAiryw( h Hydrogcnkgy Rased son reviewoftLc United Slates Geological Survey (L SGS) topographic maps of [lie area, the Airport Site is baseball between the South Pork and Nmlh pork ofGuiliano; Crcrk 'Ibemtwo wmervays arc tidal cantals that intmoitmntlybucome inundated with tidal water, umhor sporadically act as a discharge some during heavy ralastomw. '1'be Project Site is loonlel amen 150 feet to tle sous[of Wo rough fork reflhe waterway. The occurrence of groundwater bewvlh the Ahpod site is each hlmty sballmv. During vanmrs mvesrigatlorw at the Situ vicinity, the gtvwdwater table has been encountered between me and she hart below ground Wurfrce, The regional groundwater flow dnm[kn is fishipretrd to arms this regional lopo®uplty, which Waradly ropes toward the call. I fowever. Am to the Project Sily"s unique location sail makcun?nd the offeols of bodies of water within the Site vleiulty (a lagoon n) dna west and two tidal mark In Sae nhW and worth) it is arranged teat linin 6rw aPpreoinbk groumlwater nmventurtundcrncath thisSite. A-9. Site Description Tire following ddsriplinr was prepared on tld breis of site reeotaaksancc, review of available habnnation, and how The Projcct Site consists of+ 9.1 gross acres of sal land, borrow about 150 reel to the murk ofNbr[h pork Gainers Qck. A levee ontheshdh Aide of the C mk thus akng the mtdhern lamndary of the Project Site. '1'La wlfam of We Proj t Site Is carnally soured wilts slwmdic weds and grow There S n drainage wale,a aunt water collection pound, a pnmpmg stator, and a grovel road within or huniediddy adjacent to the Pr loot Site. Cnrreutb, the had is undeveloped and vaema. Historically, the Project Site appears to have been no for Paving at one time or a ethr; but it has warawrd covered Willi mamtnined grass since at least the 1980s. The ntmvay ofthe San Rafael AUpnt Is .shaded to the south oftha Project S @, Onthe whole. in iadicatimnafany eovitnndetualieopalement were observed onthc Projcct Site during We rile tttnttraissaoce. %.nno. Fa -zoo 5 FS mrHM lnmlim/ion Rryr/ PmyweAXrcrenFm�NfmJ/Ily, An RI elAipst A-10. Mhosent Lend Ilse We perhnmed a findied visual cbservation ofthe sutroundingsltrs in an annual to Identify areas of Federated risk to Ilis Site resulting Som adjacent site a sivitica Obmaal4m of surrounding sten was Ihn@ed to accessible areas and aides that could be real observed ham the Sita. The immediate .site vicinity solely consorts of the San Rafct A1rpmX which could ba divided hard tarred general aims. Iaagas aril avimionservicex sorer, miscellaneous business ever, add taxiways and runway. 'Tian miseelishera s disowns soon is occupied by several business enterprises. Several environmental invesllgatlovs have been cautioned at the Ahyod in Ilie past A summary of these investigations arnd their potential hhpaG to the PMJMI Site are preserved below: Lvle aced Shipping_ Lyle Need Striping was a Indent at the business sued of the Airport fir approximately 25 yoga. his premises consisted ofa 1200 square fclmG91 building on a concrete slab =it a handed equipment stmagc soma. As a licensed contra ler, Lyle Reed Striping served av subcontractor for large Fit Should, aM the passim roadway projects to install ell and wheel stops Ess part lots, eh. The gad area was hand primarily to Blore varimis equipments, ha", diff¢cnt cracking notions, compressors, Few vehicles, various organic solvents and marking paints in Grated transition. Lyle Recd Striping vacated rte premises in 1999. Before indicating, the San grad Fire Department requested Lyle Rml Striping to provide a voiren husfness closers plan prior to leaving the premises. In thspomc to this rocuovl, a winkplan describing the bandhngldispnsal method for all hayn'dous inatuials. still hayurdoles wastes on the prehilses was hmwarded to the Rho De hush. Further, Lyle Reed Sdiping readmit the services of Ilayerdois Disposal Specialists; Inc., a licensed envirosinental disposal contractor, 10 dispose of all ha sadnh materials and lueanlons wastes on the promises. The mnoval orsvaae nwtarials are] Ito closure office sate according to the workable war coaddined in June 1999. No further action was required. lass,owkil b FS opmml Rrvm,M,mV, Pnei/iry. finfll I�n�rpa Former Fuel Disbo rvae Facility As pmt of@o eirput alienation, too large ubowgronud Coed tacks stored mel for a rears s. A 12,000 -gallon aboveground lank containing aviation find and at 8,000gallon aboveground lankc corilandng jd fuel were located within the aviation services ores. Reportedly, am buried Pocl fines loading to the dispenses were pretty encased hr concrete. At the request of the City of Ban patent Hire Department (Fire Depa tnuark, scvmal programs of soil and groundwater sampling and obemiwl tearing owe conducted at this location w order to strums rvlmbu the .call and gooundwater leave been In>Nadal by nmutho ized refuses Som We piping reaper dipence s; and w identify and recommend appropriate remedial mcasme, if required. She results of the program iodh aced that contaminated mil and gmumhvaly zones was located at alTroximate depths of2 tc 4 fie bolmvgmund surface(bgs) within theawnoftlre fellity. Although nth and &wumheater underneath the fredity contained deteeadde concentrations ofhydrocarbon the]. A was concluded that thespatial expart rnaurmmts was mrncwhat limited. It was mtioalized that due to relatively tights raMneablo lilhglogic seyrunms underneath the Airport, coupled with the position of the Live (Wal cm rks IM contaminants did not migrate very far offsite. Nowthd� h was concluded that The site %ven reeal prwuive implementation rrfaremediaLtnamre. A winkloan containing a cornni ive action plan (CAP) which consisted afaxcavdtign and offsite disposal of contmninated soil, and extraction and disposal of inspected guru pocata'was prepared and submlhal to the Fine Department. After approval by the Fite Department, the CAP was impicnented at the site. in addition, as Iwrtofthe CAP, a program of quarterly gmuMwa4e exploring for a complete hydrologic cycle wits also implemented. A total of approximately 130 cubic fairs of coneminatat sail none excavated and sfookpiled mnsho.. Ini tier, water cmocted m mo pit poring the excavation activities was pumped out and spored in a Baker trek Hvmmapy, (lie water was Muted off-site for disposal- Alla, the excavated soil stockpiled in a pie deksmined location and covered with ITO m,areuM, awwn - Pruymre Romiaanl Fav"m Sm,Rsfi, Lqw visquim was sa[sequurtly limited to at oft -sac waste d'uposal lecility. Upon ,mil exeavatimy the pit was lint with vialuht and had fiUml with death cleat imporred ML and cnalmosa tl. It was conchWni that major portion of impacted soil order the facility was excavated and removed. The concentration levels oftenerning mil ame minancc at the Amo underneath me lcifity were mlmWaly low and dericl rrn, no further renadial activities opiatesd needed, It was bmlcvml that passive bimxnmediaticn p,ixoswa would act to naturally rnluce red anatomy clihdnate the low levels of famno ern bydeoa enn components pounnt in the timzudng contaminated mass n alarmith Ibe Site. Natural ubiquiluun microbial populations to the soil rarrtully degrade the penrohemn hydrocarbons to carton dioxide and water, resulting is natural cleanup. In September 2003, with the mnemonics ornbe FiinUepmnallo,.a quarterly groundwater moatormg program was cslabliihed to determine whether any,nsidurl contamination remained at the site.'Ihe pvformaae ofthe groundwater marketing program, under the oversight ofthe Funlupumneat, war campletd in du1y2005. The croups ofthe comeotive anslonphn, coupled with theresohs ofthe quarterly marhorurg languor revealed than thissite met all the immirensnts frr Site Closure as defined and established by the City of Sea pared lire Department and the California Regional Water Quality Conrol9oard. AuwNingly, Ilia facility was $anted sheebsura The fuel dispensing facility a this location was entirely stimulated and a env thekky was wli blivhctat u new location further west. ➢waren landscape, Inc. was a landmapitg states" that expiated and untanned various types of snit to the site. An environmental investigation including sell sampling and chemical testing f pesticides and other chemicals was conduced in M&W 1990. No chemicals ectad frwere fund at the sye. eW,..,nom,lw p 0 uutlh wr Rmwr AOP^rnlf4ercmiuud4'aiMq .tin no%MAi,14w Levee Mautenmee Pmim[ 'I Ire project involved plans to rsisc the height of the ¢dAing. levee a enT the S mfli hulk (hi IS le Creek by shout &3 reed. The prose of tris monk was to protect Ilfe Airport and adjacent properties Sam flooding tut causes damages to airplanes, canmmretel and aviation a rtatureg residences, coo. Ile plan called for placement ofappmxirnately 2,500 cubic yams of dredged materials on top of [lie h aril 'I E) evaluate the suitability of dominant luxWfials to he u, d fpr Yapping the lease, a Inugrum of soil sampling and Chemical analysis leas implemented. 'rho slope of servicer tar this project was developed haled on the recourn andatlona of the San Planation Ray Regional Water Quality Control. Board (RWQCB) INA Staff Report, Beneficial Reuse of Dredged Ivhaterialo Sediment Screeung and Testing Guidelines, dated rely 2000. The Investigation was conducted I August 2002. The resists of the soil sampling and chronical aualyscs Indicated that significant concentrations of pollutants woe let bond re the poin¢ at which filo temples Nan obtained. I ur. her, the bioassay, result also appeared favorable. A-11. Storaue1lnlue We did not cassava evidence of poteAwl nndcgronwl or a elvelonund storage Anka for hydrocarbon fiehs (iss pipes, vents, pumps, concrete foundation, and stains) at the Project Site. A-11 Indications afPolvehlorhnated ltinhcnvls fPCBs1 During the site walk-through, the PmrCet Site was impacted for the presence of liquid - cooled electrical units (transformers and eapacilors). Such nude Nay be polential polyahlminated biphonyl (PCIS) mnrecs. A palomounled hanarpr'ma1was obscrvfd near Ila pumping station on thenorth aide of the Project Site. No evidence of any leakage or spill was atwvm. A high vobage Yonsmission line is also located in the site vicinity, re vever, b is urn fur assay to how ally report an the Project Site. xrrrunnairier q bet snenl Malpto„xMw RMS „/NecrcWrvmrtl 1swift955h11 RlllAI!Iwt A-13. Indinaliond of5 fitl Waste Difloosal Evideme of major dumped solid World was not ebser'vsl at.The Project Site during the arc neteromosance. B. SI'I FUSTORV REVIEW We performed a site history tevisv to identify (he firmer nen of the Pjcct Site. 'Ibosoc history survey, lacluded levies, of axial photographs' and available regional repo¢g and hrterviaws son knmvledgmablc prople. B -I. Hist .las send of the Posher Site and the AfrumY We perhrtmcd s hire nislmy mvisv to identity former laml usexoftha Airport. Acesm ling to published hommoafinn (independent Journal, 19]9), in Rte early 1900s Ile, Marin Ranch Airport masa part of the Sae Fafad Israel) ended by Sum Smith and bis uncle, Zeke Smith. After Wold Wa' I boll, dome barged buy into fire reams via Las (Slliras Creels from San Jonquil Valley. Aller selling bay to dairymen for reseed yearS, they Asset here the dairy business themselves 'file ranch was later passed down to Sam Smltlis sons, Edward and Jordan Smith vote renamed the ranch The Smith Iimfhms Ranob. 'Me Smith brothers owned aN operated Smith Brothers Ranch onto 1990, when part of hose; sold to the cmmty nal became. Into F. Mobmis Park. The remainder of We ender land was gradually developed for residential and rvmnnsulal Issas. 1”. A''1Pht I Forty-six yeas of serial pimms coveting the Ill Site viva weer Vormhd by Neifie Aerial Surveys of Oakland, California Tlwse photographs spanned Use years 1953-1990, amt Avcrc reviewed in stem, when evadable, to aalyec threedimensions feanoes. In n odion to the show, .loosed aerial photographs covering the PmFect Site and the nnmcdiale site vicinity seem provided by inv4mwcntal IJaa Femoral (FDR). Thew acrlat photngrophs spantwd We ycaa 19461998. Appendix B womins wpims of them Idowrical aerial ple,les. rrM.ws. ass9 to FN hhrsm wal/aaartgAa, FHua RopaMRmem'imntl FxiNM S'rv, F.j kALkw/ Avr' IPhotoYear Swan 1946 I^=655' 1953 1"=M5, 1965 1"-333' 1952 1"-690' 1993 1-=666' 19" 1"-666' This ime peca(ionsanctuary oO as aerial poagn'aphs reviewed is pre mated heavy: 1550- Sewage healment plart and Marin Ranh Akport do rm[coirt. Tim area 6- an opus field. Across the north fork of(ivlllnas Catml there Is a cattle machin bushmes. All runoff base filecaldc mach appears to lead into We earn fork ofGallinas Gnat To We wmlM1ecet Of the pmtiwty, across the .mouth Orphans canal, (hue is a small airport with alrplanur, haagas amt o dirt runway. 1960- Marin Harleh Airport consists of one hangar and a dirt runway. To the mntheast, on Ore oppos he side of the bills, a sewage balmmn plait Is pralsenl. 19fifi "I'he amstnotionoftlmsemvay is auto:way. Then'nnwayappeeamalongdidrold. 'I:a the south of tie partially there are housing developmenw, ms( to the worth floic. is ranch with co nsh'netion slid Wading activities gong on. To the wet, along the railroad Imcksthare are open fields on bulhsides. 'Ilia and Mass Om Madh ark of6a dism Deck is now owapled by booms. 19]5 - Centrally. on the east side oftle property Were ala warts panda adjacent to IM r nmwvy. lit tine A'vpo0, tasx ares ciOrlenne hangars Meront. rothewestofthetimprty, an One olMr sidoaClLa�nilrovdtracks; a knew Vailw pwk aruden' 0onretmGnn. 1950 - Tlm runway aplxms tea ha paved and O¢ Ai rant contains commons hangars and paeladahplarcv Tim trader park, to the west of(he Sita, class the railroad lucks, eploars confided. To Ino earth ofthe Site, We cattle baseball linger exists, and (hat Arra appears to be under ornotnetan. wvllw. Mcxon 1t fam,m.wsri...nawca„xq,,n ft u dRmmh ..of Fm'ilea Snn IsoIAiwarl 1299 -Merin Itom:M1 Airport bas mental storage M1ungam prcmnt. 'Phot @re Oro largo bel tank bwmus Protect; one tank appears empty, with mr top owering Sevealabovagrend books are visible In btwinw's onto mevCmns.. graven] dark smm-tike areas ppem near the wcNcra hangars. Suit piles team fisc agrimdture business, along with come Lucks, ale also Pcsent. TI¢rc isapnrktu the rnNruYlls Nr'pud Generally, no outstanding fsawms appeal on the aerial photos to iditatc major environmental impairment ofthe P lett still. C. RECORDME W C-1. Regulatory Avwev Review In order to survey Scandal on- and off-site polhVand meals, we utifimd tiro so-vcees of En hommetnd Data Reasserts Inc. (®R) to contains savored regulatory linings Use silts with reported and and groundwater contamiwtiau The Project Site was rot listed oh may of the datalwms teviewed for this assessment. Within a ono -mile me his of the Property, no IJPL faci i0¢s wcec idtallacrl. kLrlhcr, within 0.5 -mile radius or IM1e Project Site no CERCLIS firokics woe Iislcd. WIILis a o.5-mim Iwgus ofthc SIW Nrvo m tililiev rot IM1e LUST Us[ wcm ideaNEcd. Iv Several, only polevllslly Larardossmaledals released Rnm bridles Iocaled approximately up -gradient and within ono -quarter of a mile Will IM1e Patient Site, or immediately adjacent to the Project Site, mejrdgel to law a reasonable potential ofmdgraRng onto the Property. TM10 Judgmcnl is based on IM1e essnmprion Ibat materials generally ds not migvdtel only large dissenters hummlly within tinned, but rather tend to migrate with gemsrdwalcr iulM1egwemldireeiionorgmundwater lime (leeceral gmmndwaku flow direction in Ihp vicinity of the Project Site is presumed! to be stationary since there is no appreciubm groundwater movement in the sulsshata. PatiaO0l stimulants databases reviewed fire this scrod am listed home /' Awry mfmp 12 FS FLWmx nalnnm &m Re/m, R,µwetl Rmenn'an,tllil ieifi955nu N.f dNyw[ ftegnlntury, Database Refnviam GRvcrrnnanMlRdiordi Radho Na. Searched Found IIS I IPA National Prim'it List NPL Imilea 0 US UPA Comprehensive Envioandeal Response, ':miles 0 Compensation and Liddlitylaformamn System (CERCLIS) US EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA) Imlle 0 Coroceive Actions and A oejdrxl TSD (CORRACI'S) USEPARCRARegideredl.oege and Small -Quantity _ AInHe 0 tidewaters (RCFJS-LQO) and (R(1t.S-SQO) IIS EPA detergency Rwsponse Notification Systun(ERNS) Tan^neawb 0 Cad EPA/ Office cfEmergency fidonnadon Cortese Imile 0 California Regional Water Qalitycontral lleard (RWQCB), /:mile 3 Isaking Underground Storage Tank (hUS'I SWF'A,F(SWIS) Solid Waste Information Spain, faadfific, '/a Mile 1 Incinerators, or frensf' Station CA Water Resources Conhnl Budd(SWRCB),Rgistared Y.mile 0 Underground or Aboveground Starago Tanks TJ T/AST) Cali6rnin ikpartmutt ofloxro Snhstmtms Control,(DTSQ 1 mile I Iwhosmrnawbam No braggy listed on the databases appears to have tiny potential advuse hoped on the Project Sit,. A copy of the rcmni w-,ach data is presented in Appendix A. Details of varmoa databases reviewed for this natant dot as follows: P United States EPA National Intently list (NPi.) Sites or Superfund. List dated June 30, 2011. The Site did not appear on NPL pat, and no do, was Nunifn:d within aonam0ewages oflbe Project Sh. ➢ IIS RPA, CLRCLIS. Contumhmtedi sips vada We Comprehensive Envdmninenlal Reslwnse Compensation and Liability Act of 1930. List dated February Z, 2011. The She did not appear on the Cl RCLIS IIs. WMdaa C -mit, rndiv of the Project Site no facility was listed on the database. ➢ U.S. LPA, RCRA Connetive Aellune and Associated Treuneart, Storage, and llisposal ('M) facilities (CORRACTS). The RCRA TSD list is a dant once maoaained by the U.S. KPA far facilities at which treatment, storage andlor disposal Pro AhnR-109 IJ FS rn i;rvxmeMM ln,nuRnno„Rnp n /YMwrnlNuimRm til Yni//p, pull Raja l aq,,t of Emotions waste lakes' places as defined and regulated by RCRA. LIW is dated Mauch 9, 2011. InErnmlimr contained in the IND list homeless the Property and no sires within l-ide; radius often site aremported on the list E 116 EPA RCRA RMismucd Oevemalom (2m®-IQG) & (RCHIS SQOb Ehe RCRA C.enerams lists am nWiomvidc dalabasrs created m maintain and regplato facilities that handle hazardous wastes. These databases mplaced the Ilarardous Waste Data Management System in Sep[mvbW1992 as the maim system supporting the Imp[emdolWion of the RCRA. lists arc dated lone 15, 2011. Tnmroalien constined in the list mdEcols that no family N currently fisted as a small or large quantity ganeretor within 'l. -mild of the Site. Small quantity generator's (SQOa generate betel en 100 kg and 1000 kg ofhrmuslous waste per month. image quantity generama (LQ(g generate over 1000 kgoflossus cus waste per mmol. ➢ U.S. EPA, Ernertl Response Nolifuatiov Skagen (ERNS) Had, The ERNS list is a Vatican[ computer dambase and letrkVal system used to store information on maidentd releases of oil and haem9ous endurances. 'Ilia immrmation stared on flits dambnsa is avgn'ved ilvough IhaNallonal Raspmsa Center. '1'ha Rnter treoksovu 35,000 incidents per year. List dalad October 3, 2011.'1lie Project Site is currently not listed as heft oil fire PENS duabasu. ➢ Cal EPA/ Office of Emergency Int rmatinn (Conor J. The Cortese 1151 is a dambase pmvidttl bythe Cal EPA/ Office of N,mergency, f hermation. Eire sites lislal an the database am taken Gum other lists. 'I he list is dated October 3, 2010, and no update is ginned. The database lists no facilities. 4 Irenkivg UndeegeouM 9mmgn'fanhs (LI1S'lJ. Yha Calimmis.Siate Wffia Rewmecs Conal Board tturrpiks psl of Lill reported leaking mudegmnnd storage. tanks incidents in tl¢ region. 'Ihc lle[ is dated SeVtembiu 19, 201 L 'I'La Shit db not appwr onthc lisp mid 3 aims within a halY-ndlc radios oflhe She were identified e lun"ema-vn '14 m blernenermoft., "ase„n Pnq o.M Mts..911miles,, we Nnf IAirporr D Eavirostor Database.'I'Im Cuvkesmr databasq prcpatvl by lho CaliWnw Dcpadmml of Toxic Subsomen Control, (DTSC) Ncnlifi¢ silts IM1aI bavc known contamination or sh n for which there may be reasons to investurge 0nber. This because Ins ReplacM Cabskos IAtalmu, wi iob is Met updated anymore. List dated September 13,20 11. not Project Site did not appear on the linvimstor database, hilt Mae "No Further Auction Required” facility was ide itifieil within aonemile toms ofthe Project Site, A Solid Wash Landfills, Ineinoratnra or Icounter Stations (SWIS} Solid Waste hrfinmwlion System. The California ialegruted Wasm Management hoard maindhis an nrveisory list of both open as well as closed and Iaactive.wgd welts disposal thoilitirca and merger stations. 'Ihe list dated Angost 22, 2011. nit Site did not appear on the SWIS list and one facility was identifid within a% -nide radios ofthe Project She. D Underground and dbovegronud Storage Tanks (DSTs and ASTs). not; caballeros are mai termol by lbs Stam Water Resources Control Board of cgidalW underground and aboveground storage toolM for Region 2. no lists "led Sc iftomer 19, 2011, road August 1, 2011; cospccti rely. no She did ml almost on tither lists, and no situs wnw, , Idoallfied on the lists within q nilemobis oftbe Project Site new rob some cnvkonmon al silts that cannot Ise Secluded. but sea Ise Installed by zip rode or (he city nem. Thwe colts are mfrnvd to as orylnm sitar. A Review of the databases indicates listing (if several shas; however those facifaies ase all bated a[. considerable distances Star thePinject Site. lteviaw ofivgnlazory ngeroiae' dxtabaaes buliostae that dnc to dismnce, potential offsite turbulence; will have no imphet on the Project She. C-2. City and Couaty Records No records of envbomnenml ominous far the Project Site were lbund at We Nsarm County or athe city, of San Rafael regulatory agenoles. mamn'a MR26915 F som,"nmNd /,"iss,im Awd Plq+nrrtl Rn'rcodairalYaJl/ry,.NnR/ /rlN/rrvt 1). DISCUSSION Thu Phase I Environmental Site Assessment fnchrded recomatheimce visits to the Project She, mvicw of the listed ava0ablo eovnrommiental databases and related agency idfimn odian Job the Project She and surrounding sites, rovie , ofprior sage cords and investigative reports, aerial photographs, published geologic information, interviews with the owners representative, and other related Items. Spoeilreallg this asussaeul was undertaken to identify areas of potential mvimnnmraal contain or evidence of chemical contamination within the limits of the Pinjecl Site md/or as visually observed tmnedia2ly adjacent nr the Poirot Site that could potentially Impact the development of the Property as amcmallonal facility. Trio Pmjcnt Site Is a whows lot that in primes ily a vered withgrasses including rye grass amt oat hay. A fovea along [lie bank of Tho Noah Pork of Ile Gallinas Qala Is Pealed approxwmtety 150 f north ofthe projeo oda. A drainage soak, pmullel b the rumvag passes through the southem boundary of the Project Site and conveys dmfinee and storin rest muff fiom tha8r jet[ Sita as wall as other portions oftha Airport pmphty hn a mnectru pound aid damage ramping. station. The collection pound and chuloge pumping station ate located cast ofthe Pmjcct She. 1ric curzcnt dmanagc. swab rcVlaced a Im'mcr dmaugc ditch that wru ro-roated in order to fnoilitate a morn eB rive diseamge of surface runoff from the runway amt runway service mad areas. Reportedly, theYrujaA Site had been used as part off Inge dairy rash in the early 1900% and more recently rows used her sheep and goat gating, Normally. low Jawk; ofpesdicides commentators arc not uncommon arthe ngriculhual envimmueurof die region. Theextent oftheir Vrush=, Ifany, woald dermar an tea sound ohamicds used and the length oftime satire theywere applied However, given the gavines land uses, it senns highly unlikely dut restrikes. have eve' been u. d. We understand that the Slate or Gdidoors Department oF'I'oxic Substances Cnntml has requested clad chosen arta whether historical airport opeatbar s may Imve contaminated the Projml She by way of migration though the drainage ditch. The algmrt Imager and IMaelmur to Gbwmwneud nace4iRxtlm, Hepxrt 9n/mvM Renrmfinxx(6mf'llal.Wu nn/m{glrywl mmmerdal areas are locoed to the wart of the proposed mcmational facility site and the runway is located south of Ilm pnpreal me etional f 'ility site. A review of reports of pmvmm mvn4lgations conducted on the adjuuoe aviation and commercial lends indicates that an matemhmvts have Armed door (he Ahlwtl to the study men. As indicated in SectioeA-10 ofthis mWA, dehydmaarbonspN ami flee lake is at the former aviation 001 dlspeming Readily, IoesMt approximately 1500 reel to the sonMvest oflbo Prujem Site was the subject of an extensive levoligall n w file early to mid -2000s. The said was rally aadrnswad, a corrective action plan was implamceted to Re satiegoWn of at regurdarry agcaskei, and eventually the facility was gamed site ebmm. Fnrtheq tie mpat bra wolf Miming cenowtor that Lad varmcd a storage emit within the commercial men near the .airport rename eoncludcd [[an Ile existence of limited amounts mgmardous materials at Ilial business Intd not impacted the adjoining properties. Currently, all existing ant commercial ums at tie airport arc subjcm to the San Regret Phe Deppllnonl Ha moues Waste reporting program and am operating in accordance with guidelines nor the proper steepened handlingormmerials. We Gather undmomuf Ibe onsite airport arrangement aaff has strict .vmrvlaNs %r uses of the facility to mourn that them is no midamiiwtien of shown dmiugc etc. For cxserpls, the ocesstonxl plane washing is lfin tedm a spesiLp area and only biodegradable maps may be taxed. While there is the pouibilityof a limited fuel or ail lark from aireatt on the taxiway or the runway, an measurable railroads have been released in the pusd,. and an onemewa hr the grant 'c appears to W nvfikcty. he any case airport management maintains aHaxmm Spill Kit with abnorled haemato deal with sulfa shampoo glass Id it ucsr. We did nee identify any major pollutants that could have potentially Imparted the Projccl Site to severs that new well mmodiatiem The resulta of the site history mvlew and the rcguletoymvlmw have also shcavu that no pollutants have signitcavtly Impacted [go Project Sheto lovers that may require pry mancliafmn. Tluxe appear to he no major source of eonsmhmtion evident on adjacent properties that may migrateW tie Pmjecl Site and'Wtbil tire duvolopmenl often land to a recreational faultily rmh 1 e rmsmv p FS eMN lnttXiemFmi /(qwX P,nynrd Furvmunr,vl fneilY. Snn Rn(ne/niryM E: MohCEllSIONS This Phase I linvimn armuld Sim Assessment hneluded reconnaissance visits to the Site, review of environmental and geotechnical rePods, awbor of the listed available envdrommntal databases add related agency intimation her the She and surrounding arras, idnerviewa, and review of prior usage. recm'dr aerial phom graphs, published geologic intimidation; and tilefwrrermanec oflindted all add groundwater sampling and chronical testing. The information thus gathered was used to cvaivate existing or potential environmen al impairmnn uflhc Project Site due to current or past land use as outlined in thisrcport. Tire Project Site Is an undeveloped paced of lend that was formally used for .some dairy ac ivides in the rally I9eoa, Out mostly had renmuwd dnadive. There are no oil Aid Instant to hdieate covibmmntal impairment dried property, and Iheefors, no mfiignidn measure appears to lit necessary at this time, hand on the nsmssmcu[described in This report,. die iniiantlgn of hazatdeos matarials or other envimnmerrtal pollutants from ofd Se wanes onto the Project Site scams wliely. Acoatd ligly, we malcipate that pollutants tempera st the site vloidty zefred M in this roped wood not impact Ilctlovelopment ofthopzrect as a declinational fel fn our pro0sslonal opinion, an appropriate levet of inquiry has bemtmade into the Previous uses ofthe V duct Sitcconsidmit with good mmnmmW ami customary induction in an nftiil to minimize liability, and doctor as noted, no ag emond evidence or indication of RecmgmiaeARmirminser al Cmsdl/iram Q(EC) have been revealed. P. RECOMM6NDA'rboNS 'I he investigation oudined in this lapmt reveahed that no "slur pollutants have significantly impacted 1M. Project Site to levels that may rinuid any remediatiao. 'therefore, m adverse mrvhnunienall impact oar the deve oomenl of IM Reject Site as a rotational freilhy is anticipated. 'therefore, rid recommenJaliods regarding the environmental iserms are made at this time. nymrva sesta 18 FS rnnlfm..new m, Rq m imsesenseless Floss &I xl colla l G. LIMITATIONS 'the data, interaction, interpretations, arm mcommenda hays contaitred in this technical report are presented solely as prelm henry hosts and guides to the existing environmental conditions of a 9 -acre parcel of land, located on the earth side or North Fmk fathers (seek, within WC San Ramal Airport (ftwrp, in the City of San Rallol, Marin County Glifomia; The conclusions and pro ossimml opinions prom med larchr were, developed in accordance with generally accepted mtgineering principles and practimw As )vRhall gwtedmical and esvironmea l reports, [ba opinions repossess] here ren subject m revisions in fight or new information, new govmnnnenml regulations or new nomparreirm of raising regulations, whlclr may be devote* In the Ihtum, and no warranties are expressed or implied. Environmental evaluations are limited in the sats then( cmiclnsions and rervnunendalions re developed Gam peiwnal interviews and infiarnation otramud from limited msemch and secondary aomr:es, liseept as set faith in this report, we Into made no indeperdert investigations as to the accuracy or comphemnees of the InNrmation derived fi'am for weoddmy soneocs and personal meadows and has swooned that such information was alcumm and complete. _ Thu services provided reprcxont Inofiewin d common, formnWled within specific budge9 limits, open which San RaGcl Airport, uC (the (hancQ can base lesions to reduce the larcnlist finexposure be liebfilty, for The consequence office occurrence ofb®,ardoos wastµ Thin report has not been prepared for are by parties alba than San Rafael Ahpmt, LLC. TI MAY not contain sufficient Information for the purposesofutbm parties or other uses. Irany changes are made in the pit cot as described in this report, the conclusions and mvemmendatloce cmaamal beeln should tent be considered valid, orders [lie d alwas; are reviewed by us, and the conclusions and recommendations are norilicd w.appinved in writing. s I...re xxroa 19 P RRFRRRHCIS C limn is Code oCRegulatmlm, Title 22, Division 4.5, Environmental Health, Chapter 11, Admimnm Standards lor Marngement offlaaardoas and liztrencely H:vardinls Waale. Holley, EJ., laloie, R.R., Spangle, W.C. and Had, M.I., 1979, Finland Ileposdsoflhe San Francisco Bay Region, Chlifonda -Their geology and engineering properties and their impndonce W the eemprehensiw planning. Geological 5arvny Professional Farm 943. GmbH Slatns Geological Survey (OSGS), Howtu and San Rafml, Cmirmnia Qmdmnglc Map.(1954, photorevised 1980L AS'1M Standards on Rnvimuuncuml Sita Assesemoula for Car memlalitem Franc, third Edition, Standard 11 1527-97,1997. Wader Assooimess, 1997, Irelimhmry Site S:wey and Limited Sail Sampling, Marin I2awll Ail'port, San Rufiel, California. Ingrain Mason & Fairhalrd, 2000, Clnfum Investigation, Former Location or Lyle Reed Striping, Smith Ranch Airport, San Rafael, CA Ingram Mason &Palrhair:1, 2001, Fuel Dispensing Facility, Smith Reach Allp rrt, San Rafael, Califinnia Ingram Mason & Morhnim, 2001, Supplemental Phase If favinamental Investigation, gaol Dispensing Faoilhy, Smith Manch Ahpon, Sao Rafael, CA Inglam fjRason & Pairhairn, 20IX2 Lnplcmcmalluu ofu Corrmtivc AGlw Plaq Pud dispensing Facility, SmiMRnnch Aimml San Rofed, GA ingrano Mason,2002, Levee Mainimmnv'e Protech. San RflGcl Aiyonrt, Sain Rafad, CA Ingram Mason,2003, InsmllmiOn oCN ''[ming Wdis ami Forst QuaMvly MOnitming 2epnq 6�un Rafval Ahporl, 3anlWfi:el, G4 hograon Maso%2004,.9e"(IQmnaly Monitoring Report,Sen Rand Ai, ,Sao Rafa,CA Ingram Manor, 2005; Third Quuna1y Monitoring hepar, San Refad Milan, San Rafael CA Ingram Sharon, 2005, Fourth and Final Qumterly Manp6rhrg Report, Son Raf IAhprt, Sm, Rafael CA re M,nexx-mor 20 A'l7PAC[IM[SN*1 7 �1111 an, gm ip VNrt[OSTATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTE �a WASHINGTON. RCi 20460 dUI z 7 21I0 Mr. Robert Hackmfln Vim frauddem,RegolatnryAffairs Aircraft Owners AM Pilo& Association 4AI Aviation Way FreJedek, Mnrylmal 21701 Dear Me Hackman Took you for your later of D, 2010, oracular clutificition on issues associated with our recent Advmnm Notice of Noposed Rulemaking (ANI'R) air Lend Emissions Gum Piston -Engine Attend Using Leadcl Aviation Gasoline. Following are sear respnses m the ass as you MW 'Em ANPR Is @o first step EPA is taking to respond to petition arm the Famous of the Earth impaiding Ilial FPA End endangerment front and act to regulate lead emissions Gom croft using leaJeJ aviation gasoline (avgatJ. Thisedvmncednodces 6tamileuaddiGmial arprmetion and input on the basmse in The penionand The potential health and envimnnantal impacts or lead emissions from mTvmR using leaded avgas. 'IYm ANPR docs not ban leaded avgas and dors not propoaelo do so, and "A has not maddishcd or imposed any date by which lead wr isseers from aircraft opeafing on IeadeJ adorn would need to be reduced. In fact EPA does not have authority N control aAmfion fuels. While the EPA is responsible to make the decisions with respect to what clemiwl or physical properties our aircraft fuel ur Additive mderpas the Asan; bea da, the Pelle al Avutim Administration mgnlatus the finds used in air croft engines; benco, the EPA is coordinating closely with PAA as we multerm emissions of lead front piamn-engine Ahmed. We have Insurers! will maintains to coordhute closely with FAA, elalw, industry groups And user mWAAS On the issues azsmided with potential finnm emission terminate. EPA uwgness; the wilue ofpiston-engine general sciatica dmngbuul lits United Slated and specifically in marme regions. Any EPA amino to requim pisheinagim abancift to reduce cormarions Oflwd in the future will involve a fhmough politic process of identifying options and will couvdersa2ly,c o impacts and other impact[. 'ITe EPAu mmitlW les voting with Nese stabodrobers tokeep piston-enginecroft flying in. nvlmnmmtaly accepmblc and safe mammnf throughout the Unite(( Slatesarr -v d..raa, oux.eoa Lo, r_ r.. v. .......,> Imu vrao ao.,mPm. &nRafael Planning Coninussion January 24, 2012 Again, grams you for your ]crier We welcome Ore opportunity w answer your questions and we look formed to uoailmdogto work wilhyon. ICyop have maker questions, your staff may tall Marion Hoyer0 (734) 2144513. Slucciely, C2 Max eigotis-0g Dimcmr Officcof Timssponmion aria Air Queliry OBERKAMPER.&ASSOCIATES A'rTAcilk9!N1'9 CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. IDORmOWOOl1pOVLnVAKD.SU1'I'PJOa - NOVATO. CAWN3 - 019)M2510 - FAX(plu smF an Decd e012, lob Ne:OV-I55 Communis Rafael Comomfh venGupmentIhpf. 1400 Fifth 1560 Se Box 151560 C 0 Sea Rafael, Faro i9J9-1560 Am. Kra1K Tamhnrnini Re. Comcmpe Mann Fand Pmmcbae Den Kraig We pmpamd the mlaohed Plan, Flood prediction Fatalities and Flood Prouci tion desmipteen whid,itI Vicatea and describes dlc location aRie leveca which ptoact Coaampu Murat tram flooding as well is prefer tin60e ahpoR Our firm prepared de plans for cam raedon of Connemara Mann as well as pmvidinK civil coal inerimgServices for dev airport property. Carl empo Madu Includes areas which are as low as cloatlon 3 NGVW9 which is a sseeal fees below the 100 year flood Newel ion of 6 NGVD29. At Lm glance it ntigda apPenr Om[ the rail road OnN m:ment would provide justices on i to Cumempo Madm, hewcva, the raiboad embmJlmcnt bas lop cicvatiom as low as elevation 4 and is creatures id ballast which is permeable mid will allow water to pass through is addition to bcin0 susceptible to readapting by a final elention rf6.lhe levee elevations mnemes the wealvly eidcol'Contompo Mmnnam m about elevation 6 whlrL will provide little or no liecbowd with reapears the 100 yenrflood elevation. Thus there is modest "nation of the two fampertics by the combined levceeyslan which surrounds them with eachpmperty dereL a havbtgur ewes tlalinterest lo the comment] ioagdry ofllt¢mlirc systmmna wdl nathcpotliw ofde systmn adjriWng de htJiviJual PMmrtica. Itthetme new.Iuattler ng euyoftbe foregoing rrifyen nem (urhm iNpt.nmiou pinnae at me knew. rinnw. Very Truly Yours, UE ed ramped RCL'1 t(2094 m. Bob Habvt - 10 SanRafael Planning Conpnission Jpnamy 2d. 2012 ORFRKAMPFR 6 ASSOCIATES Anne 20, 1991 CIVIL F.NGINFFRS, INC. Job No, 105.91 F1.000 PROTECTION CONTEMPO MARIN MOBILE NOW PARK SAN RAFAEL. CALIFORNIA The property wr s dovs elopid about twenty year, ago with protection from flooding from outsidethe Bdgcct provided by [rivers which were either existing or gamble led In conrynctlol with the Longer I. The southerly boundary of the elegantly acholoe a hillside, Along the westerly boundary a levee extends from the hillside northerly to the levee nlong the North Far% of Oallinos Creek. Along the northerly Inundary, the Collision Creek level extends to I110 former Northwesle t Pacific Holleran. These portions of the levee system are pert of mr. property of the Mull tmme not and asneintaid above tile 100 len -gflood level of 6.0 N,G.V.D. by the owners of the park. The easterly boundary of the Mobile Home Park det the Former railroad Fight of way within which the railroad embankment oxtsls at clevattona which are as low as (Devotion 4.1 N.G.V.D. Easterly From the former railroad right of way is find Smith North Airport which is pronated by 1 Invite system winch is the corrosion of the IevM atony the North Fork of Galltnas Creek and extends to San Pablo Bay along the North Fork of Gellman Creek and back along the South Fork of Galliore Creek to the hillside which adjoins the southerly boundary of the property. This levnc system Is maintained above the 100 -year, flood level of 6.0 N.G.V.D. by the owners or the Smith Ranch Airport. These systems in the aggregate provide protection for the Cantempo Marin Mobile Items Pall, against flooding from outside the project from the 100—year flood level of fine N.G.V.D. \ PK 01 } / \§\/ / /\ /{// \§}/ \ ` z/Q®± > i - [.. a / � \, � \�— . _ .K - 7 � ) m N_ Affinui URIPARTWIWO TRANSIORTAUON I II DRANO AVUNUR P, O 130X'23660 oAXLANn, CA N621 OW PHONO (110) 296 MAX t510)2WS559 m711 Novembch' 15, 2011 Mc hasig Tandenini City of San Rafanl C'anu lunity Development Depann cut 1400 Niflh Avenue San Rafael, CA 94901 Dear Mr. Tamborini:, m� aa9aaa_� q'l'TACIIffi 19 MRN -101-14.71. N1RN10Y392 SOFd2006112W San Rafnd Airport Rem intimal Pacifity— Rhad Ruvuonmrntal lmpald Repdrt(HIR)- Respolua to Comments - _ ..... - '1'llankyou for inducting the Calltomia Departmont of"Inanspoltetlon (Depin tmeut) in the __ ellvimnnental review pmoess for the proposed project, and Forlevicwing anSiesponding to Otis 0adineAin the Selrtemda'23,20111ettrs_Basedontheprojectlocmion Cie , - Deparimcn is padlealadyconcerned with the pmeulisl for tre1Hc to queue at nnylmdl of the freeway unripe, in the area onto the mainline of US llighway (IIS) 101,.msuhtng in potentially eiglficant impacts to haveler. safety. Comment M2, Response to Canonent 3-12: Under existing and future conditions, the battles at study hast sections it3 (Smith Rauch RpadFUS-101 Northbound Ramps) and b4 (inns Valley Road/OS-1111 Somhbound Ralnps) exceed the av lablestomp capadty, for [he mmlanes. Since them is no mchniul analysis dcmonsttaGng that signal Omiug adjustanpnts would adequately arduce gunning, please rovise In mitigation measules of the/911 to inehude that ire expected burning ptobmms can be adcfi xs it by adjusting the hafOc signal timing slid that the ig paltrucrd will be included in the process. Phalan provide the signal ¢ming plans to the Depadment when the City of San Rafael is ready to sbetthe evaluation. craw �w�.,�aa�ro„v.anr.mn San Niel Planning Nontinisatad - Jrvmary 24. 20[2012 M, Kraig Tamborum/City of San Rafed Novembm' I$ 2011 Page 2 Should you ieyuim fuhh rinfioetnauon mhave any gueatlons eagading tltlaleha', pleam chatact Connery Ccfeda of my staff at (510) 286-5535. silmorely, GARY RV 1Tiehfct ch C of local Development- Thegpvemmcnlal Review cw nr ammv I,ealY=1i3Ona(nm]a" ATFACHAllit 10 SAN RAFAEL S1301CFS COMPLEX SUSTAFVABTLLI'Y STRATEGY RACKGRotJND San Rafael Anpmuus been a local leader in environmental mslainabifity. We wereone ofthe first large commercial properties in Marm County mconval In renewable energy. Cut 40 kilonvad rooftop solar facility has offset over 250 tons ofgumig once gas emissions amu me Installed it back in 2004. We were also a scud motion and Meth tester for ET Water, aSued intention controller that is now Sold rating wide, and which bas out our company ami personal water nsagc by over 35% since 2005. In addition, wcmaintaln an active recycling and composting program hila at the airport, wed we recenly have begun family organic fruit and sego able gardening, along with barley production. We Lave tom at kleehie veliffes, on(a dv, and we plan soon to adult an electric chagingsmtion to Service those vohlcks. Weplautopartioipatcstartingf January in the City nfSan Rafael'sgreen business program. Finally, we are vary excited and expect to assert Shortly on plans for a 1 megavan rooftop Solar farm (on on existing aviation greens) that will provide local green morgy to Mai n pretty Authority cnstonwn. This Is expected to be MGA's first local utility earn project, and will be the first Step to fulfilling their promise to provide locally generated green power to Marin residents (vs. buying it team elsewhere and importing it). The prnject will annually offset over 750 has ufgreenlmose gas emissions. Clearly wo have been committed to lmvoring our embog footprint for many yon, and lint focus Los continued with dm propoacdrecreation project Foressunplo,we volunmrily committed to LEED certification back in 2006, long fibers the City had adopted any Rican building re9uirinaik Ibe San Rafael Airport Sports Complex is munnims! to achieving a high dela¢ orenvion mental sustamablllty in built its mshnctionamdorvgningopemtlonu. While Imprifeetenvimnmemal reviowpol dams and is therefore exempt form AB32 and ensuing greenhouse gas thresholds, we have nonetheless committed be comply will, the City of San Rafael's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strideffyvithich ban integral component ofthc City's Climate Change Accton hire adopted in 2009 to address the mandates of 1192, San kirael Planning Commobsion Jdnwry 24, 2012 'I'lie City of San Ralhcl's GHG Retlnction strategy colones resolved and recommended elements. Onrprofccl is examen Gom cvlain Nlhc meptkW elGinvds (orals as the Groan Building Ordinance), but as shown below we have nevertheless agreed to comply svlth all of them, as wall as numerous of the recommended elummdo Green Building Ordinance • 1.194DCold confliction; pr jar registered fur LEED in 2006 • I lighly energy elYiem wnatructon o Steel panelsau 1000siccyeldble&built with 25%mcycled comm( o Minimum R30 insulation throughout tostop but loss and noise transfer o prescient glans Is minimize daytime lighting needs • Nobeofingmcoalingafindom field arcus Water Efficient landscape On • Hscnativeordr'ouglmtolvmst Plank • Use Smad inigallon controller to minlndze water use ami eliminate runoff Crash nation andDemolitiou Debris Recycling Ordinance • SU^h nfconstmclion debris will Ka to Certified Recovery Facility Bicycle Parking Regulations • Provide 19 or lame bicycle parking spaces near building minic(s) Clean Air Vehicle Parking Regnlafians • Provide IS or more parking spaces designated for Clean Air Vehicles • Providcl orrsms elaGic vehicle cbargiug edtionspmvved by soLr panels Affordable Horsing Ordinance • pay requisite ln-lim housing fee into City's Affordable Housing Fund Solar fewer lreductioa • Install solar panels of rwfto provide 1000A ofprject electricity demand Installation m Wiring For Kleetrie Vehicle Char ging Stations Install I or more electric vehicle charging somorn powered by solar panels Pre-insMil wiring toaccommndme up to 2 adddinnal6mging slminvs Nahvalmlo-ation rmearkmsengrade arpl • DscwdvpennwMe operaand paved to minimize run orefrom pandscrats • Adsslid tf finntprjem intendsovert age ddemptionanall passthrough erindsonpe bets end vegetated resales to enconrnge ademption and normal filtering preserve Significant Trees • Nosignificantbecs\vlllboremtvwd • Project adds 141 new trees, increasing carbonncslrntlon I ligh Albedo(refleclive)Ruufiug • Metal roofand wall panels will contain pedcence orating to cool building • Solar PV and bol wary tubing on leof will beneficially reuse solar beat load SidmvalklBicYcle land Opgrndc • C'onstnmtnmv bipYolelpedes[rian lent tiara Smi[L I<unch head m project sire New Environmentally Referable ("green") Business • Resection is a business that crnb'iotes greatly m community hath and quality orllrq while directly pralucing little or no pollution • Will reduce oat of County car [lips (and (it Gemissions Wm wilpiprs) by providing local indem recreation facilities • Sports City uses state-of-lbeail Moore Green Generation field lighting o Gses 50"34, less clwvicity[Far Standard Ridding o Shielding elhniales glary into surrounding prnportles • Field Turf uses i regaled rubber and unlike goes, cards no water or chemicals • Cap5 inonu tui 11 include healthy onganle food Sellers. As shown above, the San Repast Sports Complex has committed to meet or exceed fee City of San Raise 's Crsenbome Cas Reduction Strategy tin new projects. This strategy Is part orthe implementation plan far WC City's Chains Change Action Plan adopted in 2009, Whose gu*d is to reduce greeolsose gas emissions by 25% by 2030, and 80% by 2050. Bymeming the City's GI IG Reduction strategies. the largest complies with the. City's minp[ed plan to noxi state angels tnnanating firm passage ofAB32. 'f bo project P.IR contains aOlIII net emissions e,timam of 2204 metric Ions. We hill dams, belms, that this estimate is significantly overstated for 2 primary rc s! (1)it does not factor in of l of the Oreenhome Ons person ion Smetegiw outlined above, and (2) it contains urate estimates of project energy usage and vehicle mows travelled by pl'oject asset. 'I'be project predate, GI I(I emissions Ilk oesholds related to AN32. 'flat GHG analysis in the OR is therefore informational in nature, and intended only to provide a bound, worst sere , pie oftire pmjectsposen ell (iI IG .m emissions. Many or lily practice outlined above not known by the consultant nuke time the Ol le, analysis was conducted. PUI example, di (fine prnlelt solar energy system was unknown. Also to kkno n was the projected energy usage ofthe fviIity. Ilemiled building planar necessary for an accurate edimnte, but such plans me typically only required ache to data Apro permit tine The GIIG consultantlion hemi is relies. IIo average2001 data usage damprotativ bytireAnergy Information Adm ry. Iourarmeanevme. wansulmiv not thecwch-all ora 2012LEED Cold certified faeap Fnrthennuildars, Me type was"Pulotimm d the catch-all type,wally the more appropriate ithengtype including "crinoline, Assembly",wealth truth, no, idt, and lly sports Recreation Utilizing ng(wldr to Assemnalplenbly" including gymnayinn; haeltill dnb,loc lino and elated rrna). Utilising "falltoAssembly vel. tOther" redoes We oslimamd oumgy-elated CHG emissions by canon half (from 1232 tans down In 6741ans). Clearly [lie bas( eslimam of iuture oumgy nsc is past energy net. Sports City, the project operator, has over 10 years experience operating two similar facilities in Cl(mtand Santa Bust. As showy In the mlachad chat, their 2010 energy usage at those facilities is roughly 110a of the Public Assembly average across the US. Partially this can be ata bated to our moderate Camaro (Spoils City docs trot plan to beat or over lire Indoor field areas). based oil their 2010 energy Liege levels, Sport City's estimated GHG in the now faclllly will be only 213 [ora, compared to 1232 tons attracted ion the hiR �sFurthermore, since ISl%ofdac project's electricity demand will be provided by rooRog solar panels, most i r ,of all or this remaining 213 tons will also be eliminated. til radiation or 1100-1200 tans or GHG emissions limn energy use brings Ile project vary nem to l 100 tons of GHG emissions. Nealy all of the remaining redinhakad emissions re front vehicle miles travelled by families using the reality. Hos ever, the vehicle miles moment used by the EM consultant did not include lac Iethereal In vehicle milers by Mann goailias who will go to the naw San Ralhcl Spoils Cerner In Iicu of travelling long visionary to visit indoor sports hankers in Cater, Sunni Rasta, or other distant cities. We know this is a signi ficem number benne we have hundreds of bonds and looks in the Err record from local Mann families and street league officials who have testified hr [his very fact. Spoils City, lot example. currently has 463 Mads residents registered fire macer lesions ad their Cokali and Santa Rosa facilities. They expect all of those I radicals will swinh to[lie new San broker facility whoa it is coin plural. since II will as closer to their homes. Ireland of aavelIing 80 miles rand trip, San Rafael Ianor Iics will drive 10 miles or less to reach the Sun Rafael Sports Compiec At these mileages, the elimination of I trip to Santa hour offsets ] nine trips to the San Raper facility. Clearly, Incorporating this data into Elie GHG analysis mould Rather: a significant reduction in estimated GI IG emissions trait vehicle trips. In summary, while the project is exempt from emissions thr ihords, tvc have demonstrated hacin that Ibc actual project GI IG emissions me likely to be enroll mom I loo train, which would be cousidurd a ICss than sinal fhcant impact under Ao32 mimed standards. Further Moro, we leave agreed to institute comprehensive p jest sustalaablllty strategies Ilia[ fully comply with the City of San Rafael's Climate Change Action Plan, which is designed to feducc City -bide GfIG emissions by 25% by 2020, and 8o%by 2050. Finally, thuigh not project related, San Rafael Aiq»rt expects In 2012 to construct u I megmvatt solar then on existing rooftops, which wil I annually e1& { over 950 tans of carbon eamissioir,.Thu combination of (be Sports Complex and solan Can. islikely to i ash It in near net /oro mnhssint ns front nice projects at San Rafael Air })�! ry )\zl;; \!iE }{ ! r Robert HoORd Erom: Raberl HeNst Smt nuMay, December 29, 20119:54 AM To; He dHeN Su19Kb SpXS City 2010 UWIty Usage FOM: AMAw RwvleTf BaA 1 Edd: Tuevky, p !Rer M, 20116:06 PM Th:R ft Herbs[ Bebjed: SOWS Qty UUIN6 Herewup.., SanW0ma25,0005f C"l 20,M SF BMbadHlfasuomMpW: TaW Nedrb xB6xgo 45,000 rf = 4. $8 kW 1, Fir F S T4W GM f 4136 _: 45 etn5F - .0)H tilerv..5 dta' r +F Irok.w:=Teo c..b:cf + 1O0 �,A;a &'t = 4.4 cuE:c f.r r fgt SANTA B0911 COTAM am =559 O18N1 p519b 2010 H.EmUcl h GASMenns PUBMICMAb G=therms JAN 10880 550 2400 329 - FEB 10800 435 8440 196 MAB 11120 358 8160 2G] MH 9" 240 2400 142 MAY =M 132 8320 68 JUN BOND 13 2310 23 JUL 2000 3 2000 14 AUG BTM 32 7220 23 SEP 25M 2 8100 31 0LT KID 81 TOO 41 NM 10000 230 8120 139 DK 9gg0 338 8880 414 TOTAL 111920 MM 94180 1812 BMbadHlfasuomMpW: TaW Nedrb xB6xgo 45,000 rf = 4. $8 kW 1, Fir F S T4W GM f 4136 _: 45 etn5F - .0)H tilerv..5 dta' r +F Irok.w:=Teo c..b:cf + 1O0 �,A;a &'t = 4.4 cuE:c f.r r fgt saa ral'ad City of San Rafael'I uilding Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Compliance Checklist Application Name/Address: :SA^ R CeC AnCr I I fid / h yet) Application Nos.: 7dVE-011, UPAS -os; Nbli F- >— Regulation Project Discussion Compilation Green Building Project Ordinance Complies (SRMC Chapter 12.44) ❑ Not S� 'w Rnog L $p *13 Applicable ❑ project Loss ills / 0 <x _ Not Comply ®Project "r rvd Water Cgiciant Landscape Ordinance Complies (SRMC Section 14.16.3]0) El Not Applicable ii(5eL J ❑ Project Does Not Comply WoodBurning Appliance ❑Project Ordinance - Compiles (SRMC Chapter 12.45) it N/A Applicable ❑ Project Does Demolition Debris Complies Recycling Ordinance IJ Not J., (SRMC Chapter 12.46) Applicable II �e_ $R.5G55) ❑ Project Does Recycling Regulations Complies /Tairar b✓,///he (SRMC ChapterX XXX) ❑ Not Applicable Ry'are) M s7. 1eeL 0 Project q Dces Iv/Ftf6 NFJkr qND Ci/y (tp5 Single -Use Carryout Bag 10 Project Ordinance Complies / SQL G�R$es5, `. (Retail projects only]blot Regulations Complies (SRMC Chapter XXWQ Applicable fib, /oi- ❑ Project Does Applicable'- Not Comply ❑ Project Does Take -Oat Footl Container ❑Project Not Comply Ordinance Complies ®-Project [Restaurant and local food purveyors only] Ewot Applicable Complies (SRMC ChapterX%XXX) ❑Project Does ❑ Not J CSBP Scss�" Not Comoly Applicable Regulations (SRMC Section 14.18.080) _ Clean -Air Vehicle Parking Complies ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Project Does Not Comply / SQL G�R$es5, `. GNBinsect Regulations Complies (SRMC Section 14-18:040) ❑ Not Applicable'- ❑ Project Does Not Comply Affordable Housing ®-Project Ordinance Complies [Residential and Non- ❑ Not J CSBP Scss�" Residential Pmjoce] Applicable ` (SRMC Chapter 12.44) ❑Project Does Subscribe to Marin Energy ❑Project Authority' Dark Green" Complies power 10 -Not Applicable ❑ Project Does Wind or solar ower ¢Proiect p generation Complies ❑ Not Applicable _ ❑ Project Does Not Comply Installation or Wiring forto r electric vehicle chargingCompiles stations Not Applicable C .S2'L' SR9GSS Project goesNot Complyand Projectreuse Complies Not Applicable Project Does - Not Comply Use of recycled water for ❑ Project landscape or toilets/urinals Complies ❑ Nol wilt A� 4e Asr1 /F f Applicable ❑Projad pees �tSpIT�G / Br7 ^MG✓L Not Comply Natural filtration of parking QYroject lot runoff Complies - ❑ Not Applicable (/' \.5'fc- t'A5,o,rS) ❑ Project Does Not Comply —0 Geeen lopf Project Complies W -Not Applicable ❑ Project Does Not Comply High albetlo (reflective) w/project roofing or paving Complies ❑ Not Applicable r+_� ..ae� sg'SGSSa ❑ Project Does - Not Comply Preserve signtticain trams. 6'Projecl - - Complies. ❑ Not Applicable CSer Sast$S ❑ Project Does - Not Comply Sidewalk upgrade 111frojed Complies ❑ Not Applicable C � 59<eS6 ❑ Project Does Not Comply Bicycle lane upgrade ruYProject Complies ❑ Not Applicable CSPG eesesg / ❑Project Does Not Comply Installation/upgrade of bus ❑Project shelter complies O Not Applicable O Project Does Not Comply Par[Icipeton in car share Ll Project program Complies 9 Fot Applicable ❑ Project Does Not Comply Participation in bke. skate ❑ Project - - Program - Complies mot Applicable ❑ Project Does Not Comply Rideshare/TOM coordinator Project for employees Complies UiNot Applicable ❑ Project Does: Not Comply Transit or carpool subsidles ❑ Project for employees Complies W-Not Appliabe ❑ Project Does Not Comply Provision of ❑Project employeeiresident shuffle Complies p Not Applicable ❑ Project Do" Not Comply New enviroomenfally Project preferable("green") Comperes business ❑ Not Applicable ( L 1 rJ`g ❑Project Does Not Comply