HomeMy WebLinkAboutSPJT Minutes 1998-04-20SRCC/SRRA MINUTES (Spec. Jt.) 4/20/98 Page 1
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER, CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, MONDAY, APRIL 20, 1998, AT 8:03 PM
Special Joint Public Hearing: Present: Albert J. Boro, Mayor/Chairman
San Rafael City Council/ Barbara Heller,
Councilmember/Member
San Rafael Redevelopment Agency Cyr Miller, Councilmember/Member
Gary O. Phillips, Councilmember/Member
Absent: Paul M. Cohen, Councilmember/Member
Others Present: Rod Gould, City Manager/Executive Director
Gary Ragghianti, City/Agency Attorney
Jeanne M. Leoncini, City Clerk/Agency Secretary
SPECIAL JOINT PUBLIC HEARING - CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL EIR AND ADOPTION OF
THE MAHON CREEK FINAL CONCEPTUAL PLAN (RA) - File (SRRA) R-375 x R-390 x (SRCC)
4-10-296
Mayor/Chairman Boro declared the public hearing opened, and asked for the staff
report.
Senior Planner Katie Korzun stated the portion of Mahon Creek being considered
this evening was a portion that runs from Highway 101, behind the existing
Corporation Yard, along the back end of what will soon be the Fair, Isaac
corporate campus, and extends into Albert Park. She stated most people do not
know the creek is there, noting it is most identifiable as the ditch in front of
WildCare facility; however, the visibility of the creek will increase shortly,
when Andersen Drive opens, and people will be able to cross Lindaro Street and
see the creek. Ms. Korzun noted the creek is approximately 25 to 30 feet in
width, with very steeply eroded banks on both sides.
Ms. Korzun reported the EIR preparation began with a Notice of Preparation, and
a Planning Commission scoping session in April, 1997, and when the Draft EIR was
completed, it was circulated for a 45 day review period. The Planning
Commission reviewed the Draft EIR in November, 1997, and directed a Response to
Comments be prepared. Ms. Korzun noted the Response to Comments was delayed
somewhat because staff was focusing on the Fair, Isaac project. She reported
the Response to Comments was completed in February, noting staff received a
number of comments and eleven comment letters. Most of the comments were
statements of opinion, or items that were clarified in the EIR, and no
substantive changes were made. However, she reported staff did change the draft
plan, noting many of the comments made were excellent ideas, and they were
incorporated into the plan.
Ms. Korzun stated staff held a Public Hearing with the Planning Commission on
March 24th to review the Response to Comments, where it was brought to staff's
attention that a letter from MCL (Marin Conservation League) dated October 28,
1997 had been omitted from the Response to Comments. She noted that letter was
evaluated at the meeting; however, there were no new issues raised, and no
changes were made to the EIR.
Ms. Korzun reported the Final EIR determined there would be impacts in several
areas. Mitigation measures were identified for each of those impacts, and
included in a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. In addition, many of
the items in the Response to Comments were incorporated into the final plan.
She reported they found no significant or unavoidable impacts, unavoidable
cumulative impacts, or growth inducing impacts, and implementation would not
require the long-term commitment of any natural resources. Overall, it was
determined the long-term environmental impacts would be positive, because there
would be some enhancement of the biological environment.
Ms. Korzun stated the EIR was prepared in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, as well as the City's and Agency's Environmental
Review procedures, and on March 24th the Planning Commission, in their review of
the EIR, determined it was adequate, and recommended Agency and Council
certification.
Referring to the Mahon Creek Final Conceptual Plan, Ms. Korzun stated staff
believed the plan was an effort to bring together three different areas noted in
the General Plan, pointing out they were trying to make this an essential part
of our Flood Control System, to recognize recreational opportunities, and to
preserve and improve valuable habitat resources. She stated that in the past
there have been policies regarding these issues, but they have never been
addressed in a coordinated manner with regard to Mahon Creek, noting it has
SRCC/SRRA MINUTES (Spec, Jt.) 4/20/98 Page 1
SRCC/SRRA MINUTES (Spec. Jt.) 4/20/98 Page 2
always been incremental, focusing on just one issue to the detriment of others.
Now staff was attempting to bring all three of those items into everyone's
consciousness at one time.
Ms.Korzun reported the preparation of the plan was an interactive process,
noting data was gathered and the information was discussed in public. She
complimented Fair, Isaac for giving staff the opportunity to make a presentation
on Mahon Creek to almost twenty-three different Neighborhood Associations. She
stated all the information went back into the EIR or the plan, substantially
revising the plan to where they now have a completely different document. Ms.
Korzun noted many of the large visual displays taken to the neighborhood Fair,
Isaac meetings have been disposed of, because they were misleading, and the plan
no longer reflects what had been shown. She reported staff now had a conceptual
level plan, which will guide our actions in the future.
Ms. Korzun stated staff would like to develop the creek, not as a linear park,
but as a corridor, that has wildlife habitat, flood control, and recreation.
She noted in terms of wildlife habitat and flood control, they were going to
change the creek cross-sections in most areas, pointing out they are very steep
vertical banks, and wherever they can, they are going to lay those banks back to
a more gentle slope, which will allow wetlands vegetation to establish itself.
Regarding recreation, she reported that wherever possible there will be a joint
recreational bike path, maintenance access, noting this would generally begin at
Lindaro Street, extend behind Fair, Isaac and the Corporation Yard, pick up on
the new bridge addition which will be on West Francisco Boulevard, and then take
people up to the Transportation Center. Ms. Korzun stated the path will be as
far back from the creek as they can make it, and there will be a flat 40 to 50
foot wide area on top of the bank. She pointed out this area did not exist six
weeks ago, because it was occupied by Summit Tree Care and Brandon Tires, and
there is now a wide swath of area where we can create the decreased banks, as
well as landscape with appropriate materials and provide a bike path. Because
there will be habitat enhancement on those slopes, staff has included policies
to protect those new wetland areas from the activities around them, noting the
biggest concern has been the pedestrian bike path, and how we can keep people on
the path and out of the creek and habitat area. Therefore, there will be
restrictions regarding the types of fencing, landscaping, the barriers along the
bike path, and the location of the path.
Ms. Korzun reported the plan also includes design standards for each particular
element of the plan. She stated they have also included a section on Design
Intent, which breaks down into three different segments, each of which will have
to be treated differently. For example, the creek banks in Albert Park will not
be treated the same as those in the area behind the Fair, Isaac complex, and the
small section between Highway 101 and Francisco Boulevard West would be yet
another very different situation. Therefore, if we were to get a project that
focused on one of those geographical areas, rather than on programmatic flood
control, staff would know what we could do in each of those specific segments.
Ms. Korzun stated plan implementation was going to be incremental, and would
likely involve multiple agencies. For example, if the Park and Recreation
Commission were to find the money to do the improvements in the Albert Park
Master Plan, that would go forward, and if we were to find the money for flood
control improvements, we could do those improvements throughout the entire
project. Ms. Korzun stated staff was going to begin trying to identify distinct
projects, find the money for them, and then design the particular segment or
function of the creek to be consistent with the concept plan, and bring a more
detailed plan for the segment they have funded back to the appropriate review
bodies, such as the Park and Recreation Commission or the Agency.
Ms. Korzun reported staff had reviewed the plan for consistency with the General
Plan, noting there were fourteen different policies in the General Plan that
relate to Mahon Creek in some way, or the different flood control or habitat
issues, and they have found the plan is consistent with all of those. She
pointed out there were some inconsistencies with the Zoning Ordinance, noting
there is a mitigation measure which states they will be putting a wetlands
overlay on the creek area. They found it was consistent with the EIR, and the
majority of the mitigation measures that were identified have been incorporated,
and are listed in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Ms. Korzun
stated staff's conclusion is that the final Concept Plan is consistent with the
General Plan and the EIR, and will be consistent with Zoning, and noted it has
been recommended for approval by the Planning Commission.
Councilmember/Member Heller stated she was pleased we were not losing any
parking spaces near Albert Park, because she felt that when the creek is brought
up to standard, we were going to have a lot more visitors coming into the park.
In addition, she believed Fair, Isaac would also be using those facilities.
She noted Fair, Isaac, was contributing $250,000 for the installation of the
SRCC/SRRA MINUTES (Spec, Jt.) 4/20/98 Page 2
SRCC/SRRA MINUTES (Spec. Jt.) 4/20/98 Page 3
bike and pedestrian path on a section near them, and asked if that would take
care of the whole section near their building, or if we would have to find
funding to enhance what they were putting in? Ms. Korzun reported we would have
to supplement that to some extent, noting the monies they were putting up would
be for the installation of the bike path, and some corollary landscaping around
it. She stated the emphasis was on installing a bike path that would safely
transition the school children from Davidson School to Francisco Boulevard West.
Staff was trying to work that into the Andersen Drive Landscaping Plan as much
as possible, trying to get a segment of it completed, and they would be looking
at how far they could make that money go.
Councilmember/Member Phillips noted Ms. Korzun referred to the bike path several
times, noting the usage would likely be enhanced because of the creek, but
pointing out there would also be more intrusion on the creek itself. He asked
what provisions would be taken to prevent intrusion by animals? Ms. Korzun
reported a recommendation had been made to install a well concealed, 42 inch
high chain link fence part way down the bank on the
slope area, which would prevent animals from going down in there. She stated
that would have to be looked at, noting another environmental group had brought
up the issue of whether it would trap animals in the creek. She stated the
Agency was sensitive to the fact that people often run up and down a path with
dogs, and if the dogs are not leashed, there could be difficulties. Mr.
Phillips asked if those kinds of issues would be covered at a later date, as we
get further into the development? Ms. Korzun stated that was correct.
Mayor/Chairman Boro stated he assumed, since we had been successful in receiving
State grants and other types of money for work on our Shoreline Park, that as we
go forward we will look for grants as a way of completing this project, as well.
Ms. Korzun stated she had received a major package of information from the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, noting that over the next 18 months, they have a
series of million dollar grants which she is looking into.
Mayor/Chairman Boro invited public comment.
John Walters, representing the Marin Chapter of the California Native Plant
Society, read a letter from the Society for inclusion into the record, quoting,
"The Marin Native Plant Society welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Final
EIR of the Mahon Creek Conceptual Plan.
"Our Comments on the Mahon Creek Conceptual Plan have, from the beginning,
concentrated on the hydrology of the creek channel, and the native plants which
are indigenous to the tidal channel, and the native trees, shrubs, and vines
which grow on the banks and the top of the creek channel.
"We believe that the Final Conceptual Plan has integrated the objectives of this
document and comply with the San Rafael General Plan 2000. The general Design
Standards regarding Wetland Replacement, Channel Stabilization, Setback -Wetland,
Setback -Creek bank, Plant Materials, Pedestrian/Bike path, and recreation are
well stated, and we hope that they will be fully implemented.
"Since this plan will be implemented in segments, it is important that there be
full compliance with the design standards for each individual segment. We
realize that funding for the final design plan are not at present realized. We
note the paragraph found in the Draft EIR Page 3-17, which states, 'Where
appropriate, a biologist experienced in wetland creek enhancement shall be
consulted to advise on the design of the proposed wetlands, buffer zone and/or
creek enhancement'. This statement is very important to this plan. We firmly
believe that a biologist should be fully involved in each segment, and that
funding for a biologist be a prime consideration.
"We recommend that the San Rafael City Council approve the Mahon Creek Final
Plan as presented in the document before you".
There being no further public comment, Mayor Boro closed the Public Hearing.
SAN RAFAEL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Member Miller moved and Member Heller seconded, to adopt the Resolution
certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-14 - RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT FOR THE MAHON CREEK FINAL CONCEPTUAL PLAN.
SRCC/SRRA MINUTES (Spec, Jt.) 4/20/98 Page 3
SRCC/SRRA MINUTES (Spec. Jt.) 4/20/98 Page 4
AYES: MEMBERS: Heller, Miller, Phillips & Chairman Boro
NOES: MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Cohen
Member Heller moved and Member Phillips seconded, to adopt the Resolution
adopting the Final Conceptual Plan, and approving the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-15 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE MAHON CREEK FINAL CONCEPTUAL PLAN
AND APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM.
AYES: MEMBERS:
NOES: MEMBERS:
ABSENT: MEMBERS:
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL
Heller, Miller, Phillips & Chairman Boro
None
Cohen
Councilmember Miller moved and Councilmember Heller seconded, to adopt the
Resolution adopting the Final Conceptual Plan and approving the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program.
RESOLUTION NO. 10168 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE MAHON CREEK FINAL CONCEPTUAL PLAN
AND APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:Heller, Miller, Phillips & Mayor Boro
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:Cohen
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:25.
JEANNE M. LEONCINI, CITY CLERK/AGENCY SECRETARY
APPROVED THIS
1998
DAY OF
VICE -MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL/
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY VICE CHAIRMAN
SRCC/SRRA MINUTES (Spec, Jt.) 4/20/98 Page 4