HomeMy WebLinkAboutPW Resident Appeal of an AT&T Encroachment Permit____________________________________________________________________________________
FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
Council Meeting: December 6, 2021
Disposition: Item continued to December 20, 2021
Agenda Item No: 7.a
Meeting Date: December 6, 2021
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: Public Works
Prepared by: Rafat Raie,
Deputy Director of Public Works
City Manager Approval: __________
TOPIC: RESIDENT APPEAL OF AN AT&T ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESIDENT APPEAL FROM THE ISSUANCE OF AN
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT TO AT&T TO INSTALL A UTILITY CABINET IN
THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONGSIDE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 109
BAYVIEW STREET, SAN RAFAEL
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt resolution denying appeal and upholding the issuance of
the encroachment permit to AT&T to install a utility cabinet in the public right-of-way alongside
the property located at 109 Bayview Street in San Rafael.
BACKGROUND: California Public Utilities Code section 7901 provides that telephone
corporations may construct lines and erect equipment along public roads in ways and locations
that do not “incommode the public use of the road.” However, the law also permits a city to impose
reasonable “time, place, and manner” regulations on the location of such facilities in the public
right-of-way. San Rafael Municipal Code Section 11.04.030.010 establishes a requirement for an
encroachment permit any time a person, utility, or special district encroaches in the public right-
of-way. City Council Resolution No. 12371, Attachment 3, adopted on October 25, 2007,
established standard specifications and requirements for the design and installation of
encroachments within the public right-of-way. Exhibit “A” to the resolution details design
requirements for above-ground encroachments in the right-of-way.
On June 21, 2021, AT&T applied for encroachment permit No. EP2106-060 to place a fiber
cabinet near the Southeast corner of the intersection of Bayview Street and D Street. According
to the permit application package, Attachment 2, the proposed cabinet is approximately 3.5 ft(H)
x4 ft(W) x2 ft(D) and is proposed to be placed in the planter strip by 109 Bayview Street,
approximately 16 ft east of the Southeast curb return of the intersection of Bayview Street and D
Street. The planter strip and sidewalk are within the City’s right-of-way and installation of the
proposed cabinet requires a utility/special district encroachment permit. The application was
reviewed by Public Works staff for compliance with City Municipal Code and the adopted
resolution. City staff found that the application complied with the City’s requirements, and
approved issuance of the encroachment permit on July 16, 2021.
Any person aggrieved by City action on a utility/special district encroachment permit can file an
appeal pursuant to San Rafael Municipal Code Section 11.04.060.040, which provides:
RESIDENT APPEAL OF AN AT&T ENCROACHMENT PERMIT / Page: 2
Any person aggrieved by the director's action on a utility/special district encroachment
permit application may appeal by submitting a written appeal to the city council, along
with any applicable appeal fee as provided in the city's master fee schedule, within
fifteen (15) days of the date on which action was taken on the application. The city
council shall hold a hearing on the appeal at its next regularly scheduled meeting not
less than fourteen (14) days after receipt of the appeal, and shall give the applicant
and the appellant at least ten (10) days' written notice of the time of the hearing. The
decision by the city council on the appeal shall be final.
Appellant Rich Petovello, the owner of the 109 Bayview Street property, submitted emails and
verbally appealed the issuance of the encroachment permit to AT&T. City staff accepted the
appeal and scheduled a hearing before the City Council at the December 6, 2021 meeting.
ANALYSIS: City staff issued AT&T’s encroachment permit after determining that the application
complied with the standards set forth in Exhibit A to Resolution No. 12371. A detailed analysis of
the application against Exhibit A is below:
A. Structures shall be located in a manner so as not to obstruct pedestrian passage on a
sidewalk or pedestrian walking path, consistent with the access requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act and Title 24 of the California Building Code.
The proposed cabinet does not obstruct the pedestrian path of travel. There is a 5 ft wide
sidewalk behind the cabinet and the doors open towards the street.
B. All structures shall be located so that sight lines shall remain unobstructed along all public
rights-of-way, in accordance with the latest version of the FHWA' s Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and the California Supplement thereto.
The MUTCD references the American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials (AASHTO) Geometric Design of Highway and Streets Manual for intersection
sight distance design. The D Street and Bayview Street intersection is a traffic signal-
controlled intersection and does not have clear sight distance requirements. The City’s
Municipal Code section 14.16.295, Attachment 4, includes a vision triangle requirement
where the corner area measured 15 ft from the curb return shall be kept free of any visual
obstruction between 3ft to 8 ft above street grade elevation. The proposed cabinet is
approximately 16 ft away from the curb return and complies with the vision triangle
requirement.
C. All new structures shall be finished in an earth tone color, or a color otherwise approved
by the City Council. All existing associated structures shall be refinished to match the
color of the new structures, unless the refinishing of existing structures will impair
manufacturer' s warranties thereon.
The proposed cabinet is expected to match the color of the existing cabinets which are
earth tone color.
D. Any structures to be located within the drip line of any existing tree or planting shall be
evaluated by the City Arborist, and the Director may impose conditions to address
concerns raised by the City Arborist' s report.
The proposed cabinet is outside of existing tree driplines.
RESIDENT APPEAL OF AN AT&T ENCROACHMENT PERMIT / Page: 3
E. Structures shall not be located directly in front of the entrance to any building located on
adjacent property.
As shown on page 1 of Attachment 2, the proposed cabinet is not directly in front of the
entrance to any building.
F. No structures shall be installed adjacent to sites containing historic landmarks as
identified in the San Rafael Historical/Architectural Survey, as it may be amended from
time to time hereafter.
The proposed cabinet is not adjacent to sites containing historic landmarks.
G. All structures shall be set back a minimum of eighteen inches (18) from the face of the
curb.
As shown on page 3 of Attachment 2, the concrete pad for the cabinet is set 18 inches
(1.5 ft) from the face of curb.
H. Structures shall be set back a minimum of five (5) feet from any fire hydrant, parking
meter, street light pole, driveway, curb ramp, or blue zone parking space.
The proposed cabinet is over 5 feet from any fire hydrant, parking meter, street light pole,
driveway, curb ramp, or blue zone parking space
Mr. Petovello called the Public Works Department on September 14, 2021 to express his
concerns about the cabinet installation. He stated that he saw AT&T employees by his property
and that he had an issue with an additional utility cabinet being placed near his property frontage
since there are already 2 utility cabinets in the planter strip on Bayview Street. The City informed
him that the planter strip is within the City right-of-way, not private property, and that utility
companies are allowed to maintain their infrastructure within the right-of-way. Mr. Petovello
wanted to know if there were any alternative locations for the cabinet, so the City put him in contact
with AT&T’s representative. AT&T and Mr. Petovello discussed the project and several
alternatives over the following weeks.
As shown in the Alternative Options Exhibit, Attachment 5, there are currently two cabinets in the
planter strip along Bayview Street. The encroachment permit application was to add a third
cabinet dedicated to fiber in an existing red curb area close to the corner of D Street. After Mr.
Petovello expressed his concerns over the third cabinet by his property frontage, AT&T provided
two alternative options. The first option was to repurpose one of the existing cabinets closest to
the driveway on Bayview Street to hold the new fiber equipment in addition to the copper
equipment already stored in it. This option involved keeping the original cabinet configuration with
the doors opening into the street and would require the curb in front of the cabinet to be painted
red so AT&T could access the cabinet. Mr. Petovello did not approve of this option because he
did not want to lose a parking space in front of his property. The second alternative involved
reconfiguring the existing cabinet by the driveway on Bayview Street so the doors would swing
towards the sidewalk and the parking space would not be affected. The reconfiguration would
involve making a larger cabinet to accommodate the fiber and copper equipment stored there.
Mr. Petovello did not approve of this option because he did not want a larger cabinet in front of
his property.
The Department of Public works had a meeting with AT&T and Mr. Petovello to try to come to a
solution on the issue on November 9, 2021. The situation and the required design standards
RESIDENT APPEAL OF AN AT&T ENCROACHMENT PERMIT / Page: 4
were discussed with the parties but we were unable to come to an acceptable compromise, so
the issue is being presented to the Council per the appeal.
Staff maintains its opinion that the proposed encroachment complies with all City requirements
and recommends denial of the appeal.
FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact is associated with this report.
OPTIONS:
The City Council has the following options to consider on this matter:
1. Adopt the resolution denying the appeal and upholding issuance of the encroachment
permit.
2. Grant the appeal and direct staff to prepare a resolution for City Council action at a future
meeting.
3. Direct staff to return with more information.
4. Take no action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt the resolution denying the appeal and upholding issuance
of the encroachment permit to AT&T to install a third fiber cabinet in the public right-of-way
alongside the property located on 109 Bayview Street in San Rafael.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Denying an Appeal from the Issuance of an Encroachment Permit to AT&T to
Install a Utility Cabinet in the Public Right-of-Way Alongside Property Located at 109
Bayview Street, San Rafael
2. EP2106-060 Application Package
3. Resolution No. 12371
4. City Municipal Code Section
5. Alternative Options Exhibit
1
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
DENYING AN APPEAL FROM THE ISSUANCE OF AN ENCROACHMENT
PERMIT TO AT&T TO INSTALL A UTILITY CABINET IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
ALONGSIDE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 109 BAYVIEW STREET, SAN RAFAEL
WHEREAS, the City of San Rafael received an encroachment permit application from
AT&T to install a utility cabinet in the public right-of-way alongside the property located at 109
Bayview Street in San Rafael; and
WHEREAS, City staff found the proposed installation complies with the standards and
specifications required by City Council Resolution No. 12371 for above-ground encroachments
and approved the encroachment permit, No. EP2106-060, to place a fiber cabinet near the
Southeast corner of the intersection of Bayview Street and D Street; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Rich Petovello, the property owner of 109 Bayview Street, appealed the
issuance of the encroachment permit, expressing concerns about the proposed installation by
AT&T and specifically to the location of the fiber cabinet specified in the encroachment permit;
and
WHEREAS, the City investigated the concerns and initiated a meeting between the
property owner and AT&T’s representative to try to resolve the dispute, but the parties were not
able to find a compromise; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a hearing on the appeal on December 6, 2021 and
accepted all oral and written testimony presented at the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings:
1. AT&T is a telecommunications utility that has a right under state law to install
facilities in the public right-of-way, subject to reasonable local time, place and
manner regulations.
2. City Council Resolution No. 12371, adopted on October 25, 2007, establishes
standards for the design and placement of above-ground encroachments in the
City’s right-of-way.
3. The staff report on appeal and evidence given at the appeal hearing establishes that
there is substantial evidence that the proposed encroachment complies with each of
Resolution No. 12371’s standards for placement of an above-ground encroachment
in the City right-of-way.
4. The appellant has presented no evidence that the proposed AT&T utility cabinet
does not comply with Resolution No. 12371’s standards for an above-ground
encroachment into the City’s right-of-way, or any other applicable regulation;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, based upon consideration of all the
evidence in the record on appeal, the City Council hereby denies the appeal and upholds the
issuance of encroachment permit No. EP2106-060 to AT&T for installation of a utility cabinet in
the public right-of-way alongside appellant’s property at 109 Bayview Street, San Rafael.
2
I, LINDSAY LARA, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on Monday,
the 6th day of December 2021, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
___________________
Lindsay Lara, City Clerk
( (
RESOLUTION NO. 12371
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN RAFAEL ADOPTING STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DESIGN, INSTALLATION
AND MAINTENANCE OF ENCROACHMENTS IN THE
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Rafael has adopted Ordinance No. 1862
regulating encroachments into the public right-of-way within the City; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1862 requires applicants for certain encroachment
permits to comply with detailed specifications for design standards for above-ground
encroachments, and/or for excavations in the public right-of-way, and/or for the construction of
curbs, gutters, driveway cuts and related work in the public right-of-way, and authorizes the City
Council to adopt such specifications by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the requirements and
specifications attached hereto as Exhibits "A, "B," and "C," for design standards for above-
ground encroachments, for excavations in the public right-of-way, and for the construction of
curbs, gutters, driveway cuts and related work in the public right-of-way, and finds that adoption
of such specifications will advance the public health, safety and welfare by ensuring the
consistent, safe and proper construction of improvements in and to the public right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the City is limited by the requirements of State law as to the extent to
which it may regulate the use of its rights-of-way by telecommunications agencies, and the City
Council has been advised that it may only regulate the time, place and manner of such use.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
San Rafael that the requirements and specifications set forth in Exhibits "A, "B," and "C,"
1
(
attached hereto and incorporated herein, for design standards for above-ground encroachments,
for excavations in the public right-of-way, and for the construction of curbs, gutters, driveway
cuts and related work in the public right-of-way, are hereby adopted and shall apply to
applications and permits for encroachments in the public right-of-way pursuant to Ordinance No.
1862, effective upon the effective date of such Ordinance.
I, JEANNE M. LEONCINI, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Council of said City on October 15, 2007 by the following vote, to wit:
A YES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Heller, Miller, Phillips & Vice-Mayor Cohen
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
DISQUALIFIED/
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Baro (due to absence from meeting)
2
EXHIBIT "A"
DESIGN AND LOCATION STANDARDS FOR ABOVE-GROUND
ENCROACHMENTS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
A. Structures shall be located in a manner so as not to obstruct pedestrian passage on
a sidewalk or pedestrian walking path, consistent with the access requirements of the Americans
with Disabilities Act and Title 24 of the California Building Code.
B. All structures shall be located so that sight lines shall remain unobstructed along
all public rights-of-way, in accordance with the latest version of the FHWA's Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices and the California Supplement thereto.
C. All new structures shall be finished in an earthtone color, or a color otherwise
approved by the City Council. All existing associated structures shall be refinished to match the
color of the new structures, unless the refinishing of existing structures will impair
manufacturer's warranties thereon.
D. Any structures to be located within the drip line of any existing tree or planting
shall be evaluated by the City Arborist, and the Director may impose conditions to address
concerns raised by the City Arborist's report.
E. Structures shall not be located directly in front of the entrance to any building
located on adjacent property.
F. No structures shall be installed adjacent to sites containing historic landmarks as
identified in the San Rafael Historical/ Architectural Survey, as it may be amended from time to
time hereafter.
G. All structures shall be set back a minimum of eighteen inches (18) from the face
of the curb.
H. Structures shall be set back a minimum of five (5) feet from any fire hydrant,
parking meter, street light pole, driveway, curb ramp, or blue zone parking space.
3
l
EXHIBIT "B"
REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
EXCAVATIONS IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
A. Timing of Installations-Special right-of-way restoration standards.
1. No excavation shall be permitted in any portions of the public right-of-way
that were constructed or resurfaced during the five (5) year period prior to the proposed
excavation. This prohibition shall not apply to emergency excavations approved by the Director.
A proposed excavation shall be considered an emergency if it is necessary to repair or replace
underground facilities in order to prevent a disruption of services to customers or prevent injury
or damage to life or property. This prohibition also shall not apply to excavations required to
provide essential utility services to a property where there are no other reasonable means of
providing such services to the property or where the work is mandated by state or federal laws or
orders and the excavation cannot be reasonably avoided as determined in both events by the
Director. In the event of an excavation permitted by this subsection, the affected right-of-way
shall be restored in accordance with the right-of-way restoration standards approved by the
Director.
2. The special right-of-way restoration standards described in Subsection
(B)(l) also shall apply to any portions of the public right-of-way that have been constructed or
resurfaced more than five (5) years before the proposed excavation, provided that the right-of-
way has a pavement condition index of seventy (70) or higher as described in the City's
pavement management program.
3. On an annual basis, the City and each utility, special district or other user
of the public right-of-way shall coordinate their current-year and to the extent practicable their
five-(5) year capital improvement programs for public right-of-way installations in order to
reduce the number of excavations that occur. Such coordination shall occur annually at the time
and in the manner specified by the Director. The Director may submit an annual report to the
City Council on the results of this coordination process. This report may include
recommendations on the timing of City right-of-way projects to accommodate street projects
planned by utilities, special districts, or other users of the public rights-of-way.
B. Performance of work. No trench, for the purpose oflaying pipes or conduits, shall
be opened in any graded street or thoroughfare farther than necessary in front of the pipe or
conduit place therein, except in case of emergency and upon consent of the Director. All such
trenches shall be backfilled and the old tom-up pavement shall be removed from the street,
together with the surplus excavated material, within two (2) working days from the time such
material is placed upon the street, except as otherwise allowed in writing by the Director.
Backfilling of an excavation shall be in accordance with the standard details and specifications of
the City, or those other specifications required by the Director for the particular project, both as
to material and method. Backfill shall not be placed in any excavation without compaction of the
material used therein, the degree and method thereof to be in accordance with City standards and
to the satisfaction of the Director. All trenches shall be restored within twelve (12) working days
4
(
from the time the trench was refilled, except as otherwise approved by the Director. All open
trenches (trenches not filled to finished grade) shall be covered with anti-skid metal trench plates
and properly wedged. Cutback shall be placed around the plates to provide a smooth transition
with the surface of the contiguous pavement. In every case, the work of repaving over all
trenches shall commence immediately after said trenches are backfilled. The work of clearing up
the streets is to be considered a part of the repaving work, and shall be finished within the time
allowed for repaving and to the satisfaction of the Director.
C. Pavement requirements. In every case the street or thoroughfare opened or tom
up shall be restored by the person opening or tearing up the same according to the standard plans
and specifications for pavement on file with the office of the Director, unless otherwise approved
by the Director.
D. Work to be maintained --performance of work by City. In case the pavement or
surface of the street over openings should become depressed or broken at any time due to
improper or inadequate work by the permittee, the permittee for whom the street was opened
shall, upon a written notice from the Director, immediately proceed to repair and restore the
pavement in a proper and workmanlike manner to the satisfaction of the Director. In case the
pavement is not completely restored within ten (10) working days after such notice has been
given, and unless delayed by conditions beyond the permittee's control, the Director shall
thereupon cause the work to be done, at the expense of the delinquent permittee, after giving the
permittee not less than five (5) working days final notice.
E. Abandoned facilities. Whenever any pipe, conduit, duct, tunnel or other structure
located under the surface of any public street, alley or other public place, or the use thereof, is
abandoned, the person, utility or special district owning, using, controlling or having an interest
therein, shall, unless otherwise approved by the Director, either remove the pipe, conduit, duct,
tunnel or other structure or cap the ends to prevent water intrusion.
F. Weight limitation exemptions and designated streets.
1. Exemptions. The weight limitation set forth in Section 5.52.021 of this
code shall not be applicable to vehicles operating on a project for which a grading or fill permit
has been issued by the City, provided said vehicles are traveling on routes designated by City's
Department of Public Works.
2. Authorized Routes. The Department of Public Works of the City shall
have the authority to designate the route or routes to be traveled by vehicles operating on projects
for which grading and or fill permits have been issued.
G. Security.
1. Prior to the issuance of any encroachment permit, the Director may require
the permittee to deliver to the City satisfactory security in the amount of one hundred and ten
percent (110%) of the total estimated cost of all work to be performed under such permit, as
determined by the Director. Such security shall consist of an irrevocable letter of credit, cash
5
deposit, or performance bond as determined by the Director. The security shall be provided in
the manner required by the Director and maintained in full force and effect until the permitted
work in the public right-of-way is completed to the satisfaction of the Director, at which time the
amount of the security shall be reduced to ten percent (10%) of the actual cost of the work. The
reduced security shall be maintained by the permittee for a period of one year as a guarantee that
the work is of good quality and free from any defective or faulty material or workmanship. Any
surety supplying a performance bond must be an "admitted surety insurer," as defined in Section
995.120 of the Code of Civil Procedure, authorized to do business in the State of California.
Return of the security shall be conditioned upon the permittee' s faithful performance of all work
in the public right-of-way specified in the applicable permit. In the event the permittee fails to
comply with any provisions of this chapter related to such work, or any provision of the
encroachment permit or encroachment permit agreement, or other approval related to such work,
any damages or loss suffered by the City as a result thereof shall be recoverable from the security,
including but not limited to the full amount of any compensation, indemnification, cost of
removal, or abandonment of any property of the permittee, plus reasonable attorneys' fees and
costs up to the full amount of the security. Performance securities shall not be required from any
utility or special district except where the Director finds that there are exceptional circumstances
indicating that such security is required to protect the City.
2. Neither the provisions of this section nor any damages recovered by the
City hereunder shall be construed to excuse the permittee's faithful compliance with any
encroachment permit or encroachment permit agreement or limit the liability or damages of the
permittee under this chapter, either to the full amount of the security or otherwise. In addition to
its rights to take action under the security, the City may pursue any other remedy provided by
law.
6
( (
EXHIBIT "C"
REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF CURBS, GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAY CUTS, ETC.
IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
A. Construction materials. No sidewalk, driveway approach, curb, or curb and gutter
shall be constructed other than of concrete, unless special permission therefor be first obtained
from the Director by the permittee.
B. Line and grade stakes. Where the street is unimproved or where existing curbs are
in poor condition, or not on official line and grade, the applicant may be required, if so directed
by the Director, to hire a registered engineer at the applicant's sole expense to provide a detailed
engineered plan for the frontage improvements for review and approval by the Director, to ensure
that proposed improvements will be compatible with construction of future improvements by
adjacent properties.
C. Performance of work. All sidewalks, driveway approaches, curbs, or curbs and
gutters must be constructed in accordance with the standard plans and specifications for
sidewalks, driveway approaches, curbs, or curbs and gutters on file in the office of the Director,
reference to which is hereby made for further particulars. All sidewalks, driveway approaches,
curb, or curb and gutter work shall be done under the general direction and to the satisfaction of
the Director.
D. Gutter obstruction by driveway approaches. The Director has the power to require
property owners to remove driveway approaches where they are an obstruction to the gutter, and
to reconstruct driveway approaches where drainage or other conditions are unsatisfactory.
E. Limitation on width of driveway approaches.
1. No driveway entrance or approach leading from the street into any
property, premises, structure or building fronting thereon, shall be constructed or maintained
which is a) less than the minimum width required under the zoning ordinance; orb) greater than
forty feet (40'). No additional driveway entrance or approach shall be constructed or maintained
into or from the same premises at any distance closer than twenty-five feet (25') to any existing
driveway entrance or approach. Where two (2) or more driveway entrances or approaches are
constructed at or about the same time, they shall be constructed so as to be separated by a
sidewalk area or island not less than twenty-five feet (25') in width at the narrowest point.
2. Notwithstanding the prohibition of subsection (E)l of this section, the
Director may grant an encroachment permit for the construction or maintenance of driveway
entrances or approaches of any width or separation when the location or use of the subject
property, public safety, or any other factors so require.
7
( (
F. Replacing curb where driveway no longer used. Where a curb has been broken to
provide a driveway for a residence or a business and such driveway is no longer needed or used
as a driveway, the owner of the property or the owner or operator of the business shall replace the
curb and repair any damage done to the sidewalk by the use of such driveway. Such work shall
be done in conformity with the requirements for the construction of curbs and sidewalks.
8
104-2021CITY : SAN RAFAELGIGAPOWER PROJECT109 BAYVIEW ST, SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901,USAPROJECT NO : A01ZFFAISSUE1222 VINE ST., SUITE 301PASO ROBLES, CA 93446Tel: (805) 467-2528 Fax: (805) 467-2529GEO/CO ___________________________________EXCHANGE ___________________________________ENGR. ________________ TEL. ______________ENGR ARC _________________________________TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION _____________________RO/EST. NO. ____________________DWG. ___________OF ___________DA # 2242LAA01ZFFA1 6GIGAPOWER PROJECTPERMIT PLANBAYVIEW STDATESNRFCA01BAYVIEW STBAYVIEW STPFP PHYSICAL ADDRESS : 109 BAYVIEW ST , SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901, USAW371SMITH, PETER JVIEW OF PROPOSED PAD MOUNTED CABINETLOOKING EAST ALONG BAYVIEW STVIEW OF PROPOSED PAD MOUNTED CABINETLOOKING NORTH ALONG BAYVIEW STVIEW OF PROPOSED PAD MOUNTED CABINETLOOKING WEST ALONG BAYVIEW STCONSTRUCTION DRAWING/SUBMITTAL REVIEWAPPROVEDAPPROVED WITHCHANGES NOTEDREVISE AND RESUBMITREJECTEDSUBMITTAL WAS REVIEWED FOR DESIGN CONFORMITY ABDGENERAL CONFORMANCE TO MUNICIPAL REQUIREMENTS.BY : _______________ DATE:_______________PERMIT # : ______________ PFPLOCATIONMH 333 SB2377AT&T WILL BE ACCESSING:· MH 333 TO SPLICE· SB 2377 TO PLACE FIBER & SPLICE· PFP LOCATION TO PLACE NEW PAD PAD MOUNTED CABINET, CONDUIT, & SPLICE FIBERINDEX:DWG 1. COVER SHEETDWG 2. LAYOUT DRAWINGDWG 3. LAYOUT DETAIL DRAWINGDWG 4. CABINET SPECSDWG 5. TCP TYPICALDWG 6. TCP TYPICAL~at&t 40fi 401 □ □ 402 HJ ·oo 106 □ □ iewsr 02 Bayview St 347 ?07 Bayview St PEARCE ---))SERVICES 346 343 07 344 ()5 10 ~3;;1 33~ 340 -
ROWC/LBOCROWBOCSIDEWALKSIDEWALKROWC/LBOCROWBOCSIDEWALKSIDEWALKROWC/LBOCROWBOCSIDEWALKSIDEWALKBAYVIEW ST ASPHALTBAYVIEW ST ASPHALTBAYVIEW ST ASPHALTBAYVIEW ST34'60'34'60'SIDEWALK D ST ASPHALTROWC/LBOCSIDEWALKBOCSIDEWALKROW D ST ASPHALT40'74'74'40'0+84 AT&T VRAD CABINET0+98 AT&T SAI CABINET0+53 (P) AT&T FIBER CABINET0+62 AT&T SPLICE BOX(P) 1-4" CONDUIT0+90 JOINT POLE(P) 5' X 3' CONCRETE PAD0+000+80 DOWN GUY ANCHOR800-227-2600 or 8111222 VINE ST., SUITE 301PASO ROBLES, CA 93446Tel: (805) 467-2528 Fax: (805) 467-2529GEO/CO __________________________________EXCHANGE_________________________________ENGR. ________________ TEL. _____________ENGR ARC ________________________________TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ____________________RO/EST. NO. ____________________DWG. ___________OF ___________ALP-84BUWTESSDGROW RIGHT OF WAYROW RIGHT OF WAYBOC BACK OF CURBLOG LIP OF GUTTERFOW FRONT OF WALKBOW BACK OF WALKEOD EDGE OF DRIVEWAYEOW EDGE OF WALKWAYSW SIDEWALKPS PARKSTRIPD/W DRIVEWAYC/L CENTERLINEUTILITIESWATERTELEPHONEELECTRICSANITARY SEWERSTROM DRAINGASWATER VALVEWATER METERDIG PITTREEHEDGEFENCELINEPOTHOLEBOLLARDROAD SIGNMANHOLEPOLEFIRE HYDRANTMONUMENTTRAFFIC LIGHT(STANDALONE)STREETLIGHTSUB BOXVARD CABINETSAI CABINETMHLEGENDCALL USA TOLL FREE48 HRS PRIOR TO DIGGINGFOR ALL SUBSTRUCTURELOCATIONSGIGAPOWER PROJECTPERMIT PLAN1 04-2021ISSUEDATE0' 20' 40' 60' 80'1" = 40'2 6GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES :1. EXERCISE EXTRA CAUTION WHEN DIGGING ANDPLACING THE FACILITIES FOR AT&T CALIFORNIA, ASOTHER UTILITIES MAY BE IN PROXIMITY OF THE WORKLOCATION.2. EXTREME CARE IS TO BE TAKEN TO ENSURE MINIMALDAMAGE TO PLANTED AREAS.3. ALL BENDS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A 6'-0"MINIMUM RADIUS.4. NOTIFY CITY OR COUNTY OFFICIALS 48 HOURSPRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK OPERATIONS. ADHERETO ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.5. ALL WORK AREAS TO BE RESTORED TO CITY ORCOUNTY/ MUNICIPALITY STANDARDS.6. AT&T ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEACCURACY OF THE SUBSTRUCTURE INFORMATIONHEREIN PROVIDED. THE USER ASSUMESRESPONSIBILITY FOR VERIFYING SUBSTRUCTURELOCATIONS BEFORE EXCAVATING AND ASSUMES ALLLIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO TELEPHONE FACILITIES ASA RESULT OF SUCH EXCAVATION. CALL UNDERGROUNDSERVICE ALERT ON:(800) 227-2600 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING INPROXIMITY TO TELEPHONE PLANT.CONSTRUCTION DRAWING/SUBMITTAL REVIEWAPPROVEDAPPROVED WITHCHANGES NOTEDREVISE AND RESUBMITREJECTEDSUBMITTAL WAS REVIEWED FOR DESIGN CONFORMITY ABDGENERAL CONFORMANCE TO MUNICIPAL REQUIREMENTS.BY : _______________ DATE:_______________PERMIT # : ______________DA # 2242LAA01ZFFASNRFCA01W371SMITH, PETER JPROPOSED WORK:1) PLACE 5' OF 1-4" CONDUIT FROM SB 2377 TO NEW AT&T FIBER CABINET2) PLACE 5' X 3' CONCRETE PAD3) PLACE AT&T FIBER CABINET4) RESTORE ALL LOCATIONS TO SAN RAFAEL STANDARDSlt I I ... -~ ... .'•.: l/t ------=::::::: □ □ □ □ ~at&t r 7 L .J SEARCE p ))SERVICES -,==1 ==--71
ROWC/LBOCROWBOCSIDEWALKSIDEWALKBAYVIEW ST ASPHALT60'34'0+84 AT&T VRAD CABINET0+98 AT&T SAI CABINET0+53 (P) AT&T FIBER CABINET0+62 AT&T SPLICE BOX(P) 1-4" CONDUIT0+90 JOINT POLE(P) 5' X 3' CONCRETE PADSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSAN SANSAN SAN0+80 DOWN GUY ANCHOR5'0+001.5'2.1'800-227-2600 or 8111222 VINE ST., SUITE 301PASO ROBLES, CA 93446Tel: (805) 467-2528 Fax: (805) 467-2529GEO/CO __________________________________EXCHANGE_________________________________ENGR. ________________ TEL. _____________ENGR ARC ________________________________TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ____________________RO/EST. NO. ____________________DWG. ___________OF ___________CALL USA TOLL FREE48 HRS PRIOR TO DIGGINGFOR ALL SUBSTRUCTURELOCATIONSGIGAPOWER PROJECTPERMIT PLAN1 04-2021ISSUEDATE3 6DETAILEDVIEWGENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES :1. EXERCISE EXTRA CAUTION WHEN DIGGING ANDPLACING THE FACILITIES FOR AT&T CALIFORNIA, ASOTHER UTILITIES MAY BE IN PROXIMITY OF THEWORK LOCATION.2. EXTREME CARE IS TO BE TAKEN TO ENSUREMINIMAL DAMAGE TO PLANTED AREAS.3. ALL BENDS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A 6'-0"MINIMUM RADIUS.4. NOTIFY CITY OR COUNTY OFFICIALS 48 HOURSPRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK OPERATIONS.ADHERE TO ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.5. ALL WORK AREAS TO BE RESTORED TO CITY ORCOUNTY/ MUNICIPALITY STANDARDS.6. AT&T ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEACCURACY OF THE SUBSTRUCTURE INFORMATIONHEREIN PROVIDED. THE USER ASSUMESRESPONSIBILITY FOR VERIFYING SUBSTRUCTURELOCATIONS BEFORE EXCAVATING AND ASSUMESALL LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO TELEPHONEFACILITIES AS A RESULT OF SUCH EXCAVATION.CALL UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT ON:(800) 227-2600 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING INPROXIMITY TO TELEPHONE PLANT.CONSTRUCTION DRAWING/SUBMITTAL REVIEWAPPROVEDAPPROVED WITHCHANGES NOTEDREVISE AND RESUBMITREJECTEDSUBMITTAL WAS REVIEWED FOR DESIGN CONFORMITY ABDGENERAL CONFORMANCE TO MUNICIPAL REQUIREMENTS.BY : _______________ DATE:_______________PERMIT # : ______________DA # 2242LAA01ZFFASNRFCA01W371SMITH, PETER JGIGAPOWER PROJECT109 BAYVIEW ST, SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901,USAPROJECT NO : A01ZFFAPROPOSED WORK:1) PLACE 5' OF 1-4" CONDUIT FROM SB 2377 TO NEW AT&T FIBER CABINET2) PLACE 5' X 3' CONCRETE PAD3) PLACE AT&T FIBER CABINET4) RESTORE ALL LOCATIONS TO SAN RAFAEL STANDARDSINDEX:DWG 1. COVER SHEETDWG 2. LAYOUT DRAWINGDWG 3. LAYOUT DETAIL DRAWINGDWG 4. CABINET SPECSDWG 5. TCP TYPICALDWG 6. TCP TYPICAL~at&t --~ ----PEARCE ----•))SERVICES □ □ □ □
1 04-2021CITY : SAN RAFAELDA # 2242LAA01ZFFA4 6GIGAPOWER PROJECTPERMIT PLANGIGAPOWER PROJECT109 BAYVIEW ST, SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901,USAPROJECT NO : A01ZFFAISSUE1222 VINE ST., SUITE 301PASO ROBLES, CA 93446Tel: (805) 467-2528 Fax: (805) 467-2529GEO/CO ___________________________________EXCHANGE ___________________________________ENGR. ________________ TEL. ______________ENGR ARC _________________________________TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION _____________________RO/EST. NO. ____________________DWG. ___________OF ___________DATESNRFCA01W371SMITH, PETER JCONSTRUCTION DRAWING/SUBMITTAL REVIEWAPPROVEDAPPROVED WITHCHANGES NOTEDREVISE AND RESUBMITREJECTEDSUBMITTAL WAS REVIEWED FOR DESIGN CONFORMITY ABDGENERAL CONFORMANCE TO MUNICIPAL REQUIREMENTS.BY : _______________ DATE:_______________PERMIT # : ______________AT&T WILL BE ACCESSING:· MH 333 TO SPLICE· SB 2377 TO PLACE FIBER & SPLICE· PFP LOCATION TO PLACE NEW PAD PAD MOUNTED CABINET, CONDUIT, & SPLICE FIBERINDEX:DWG 1. COVER SHEETDWG 2. LAYOUT DRAWINGDWG 3. LAYOUT DETAIL DRAWINGDWG 4. CABINET SPECSDWG 5. TCP TYPICALDWG 6. TCP TYPICALPFP LS576/864 CONCRETE PAD & MOUNTING BRACKET. -.. • ,d P.C,C. (CLA:S A) CJ lc29 ~ ~ LANDSCAPED EARTH CONCRETE IPA!BAND OR [XIS'll'IN,G CONCRETE OR AREA GIRA VEL BED ASPHALT ARiE:A 4' DIA STANDARD STEEL PIPE, 25 Lll/F T M]N . IP□RTLAND CEMENT C□NC.RETE (CLASS A> PiROflLE Of' CONCRETE PA1D WITHIIN LANDSCAPED AREA CORNING PFP LS576/864 CAB 49.75'"(H) x 7'6.5'"(W) x 26.0~(D) PROFILE OF OONICREfE PAO FLUSH WITH IE:XISTING GRADE CCINCRE:TE: PAD DIMEN$1[]MS VARY PER LOCA llON SCALE: /'IOI Ill 8Gliflt ~at&t □ □ □ □ PEARCE -----e))SERVICES
1222 VINE ST., SUITE 301PASO ROBLES, CA 93446Tel: (805) 467-2528 Fax: (805) 467-2529GEO/CO __________________________________EXCHANGE_________________________________ENGR. ________________ TEL. _____________ENGR ARC ________________________________TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ____________________RO/EST. NO. ____________________DWG. ___________OF ___________GIGAPOWER PROJECTPERMIT PLAN1 04-2021ISSUEDATETANSATPORTABLE FLASHING BEASCON (P.F.B)TYPE III BARRICADE W/SIGNTYPEMII BARRICADE W/SIGNCHANNELIZING DEVICETRAFFIC CONE WITH CLIP ON SIGNTYPE I W/SIGNEXISTING SIGNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONFLASHING ARROW BOARDHIGH LEVEL WARNING DEVICE (FLAGTREE)FLAGGERTOW AWAY NO STOPPING ANY TIMEEXISTING DRIVEWAYWORK ZONE (ACTIVITY AREA) LIMITSDIRECTION OF TRAFFIC (NOT PAVEMENT MARKING)SLEGEND* - The distances are approximate, are intended for guidance purpasesonly, and should be applied with engineering judgment. These distancesshould be adjusted by the Engineer for filed conditions, if necessary, byincreasing or decreasing the recommended distances.TAPER LENGTH CRITERIA ANDCHANNELIZING DEVICE SPACINGSPEED(S)MINIMUM TAPER LENGTH*FOR WIDTH OF OFFSET 12 FEET (W)MAXIMUM CHANNELIZINGDEVICE SPACINGX Y Z**TANGENT2LMERGINGLSHIFTINGL/2SHOULDERL/3TAPERTANGENT CONFLICTMPH FT FT FT FT FT FT FT20 160 80 40 27 20 40 1025 250 125 63 42 25 50 1230 360 180 90 60 30 601535 490 245 123 82 35 701740 640 320 160 107 40 80 20451080 540 270 1804590 2250 1200 600 300 200 50 100 25551320 660 330 220 50 100 2560 1440 720 360 240 50 100 2565 1560 780 390 260 50 100 2570 1680 840 420 280 50 100 25751800 900 450 300 50 100 25ADVANCE WARNING SIGN SPACINGROAD TYPEDISTANCE BETWEEN SIGNS*A BCFT FT FTURBAN - 25 MPH OR LESS100 100 100URBAN - MORE THAN 25 MPH TO 40 MPH 250 250 250URBAN - MORE THAN 40 MPH350 350 350RURAL500 500 500EXPRESSWAY/FREEWAY1000 1500 2640PEDESTRIAN CONTROL NOTES :A DEDICATED INDIVIDUAL WILL BE ASSIGNED THERESPONSIBILITY OF ESCORTING PEDESTRIANSTHROUGH THE WORK AREA IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHREE MAJOR CONSIDERATIONS:1. PEDESTRIANS SHOULD NOT BE LED INTODIRECT CONFLICT WITH WORK SITE VEHICLES,EQUIPMENT OR OPERATIONS2. PEDESTRIANS SHOULD NOT BE LED INTODIRECT CONFLICT WITH MAINLINE TRAFFICGOING THROUGH OR AROUND THE WORK SITE.3. PEDESTRIANS SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITH AREASONABLY SAFE, CONVENIENT ANDACCESSIBLE PATH THAT REPLICATES ASNEARLY AS PRACTICAL THE MOST DESIRABLECHARACTERISTICS OF THE EXISTINGSIDEWALK OR FOOTPATH.* - For other offsets, use the following merging taper length formula for L:For speed of 40 mph or less, L = WS²/60For speed of 45 mph or more, L = WSWhere: L = Taper length in feetW = Width of offset in feetS = Posted speed limit, off-peak 85th-percentilespeed prior to work starting, or the anticipatedoperating speed in mph** - Use for taper and tangent sections where there are no pavement markings or wherethere is a conflict between existing pavement markings and channelizers (CA).5 6TYPICAL APPLICATION APPLIESFOR SB 2377 & PFP LOCATIONCONSTRUCTION DRAWING/SUBMITTAL REVIEWAPPROVEDAPPROVED WITHCHANGES NOTEDREVISE AND RESUBMITREJECTEDSUBMITTAL WAS REVIEWED FOR DESIGN CONFORMITY ABDGENERAL CONFORMANCE TO MUNICIPAL REQUIREMENTS.BY : _______________ DATE:_______________PERMIT # : ______________DA # 2242LAA01ZFFASNRFCA01W371SMITH, PETER JINDEX:DWG 1. COVER SHEETDWG 2. LAYOUT DRAWINGDWG 3. LAYOUT DETAIL DRAWINGDWG 4. CABINET SPECSDWG 5. TCP TYPICALDWG 6. TCP TYPICALCalifornia t-1ll'I'C..1J 2014 Edifum Page 1150 · r A'9 1'.ITITCD 2009 Edlrtio:u,, !iIJdu:diillg Jt:Btision,; 1 & -, as :m!l!lldl!d for me in C:lilifi:m1iia) F"gure 6H .. 6. Shoulde1r Work wiith Mino·r Encr,oachment ,(TA. 6) OYlHY )Rf(JM GYOH +.., __ E_Na __ \_.. fl:OAD WORK G20-2 G20-2 HOM OVOH ON] (optional~ Chapter 6H-'Fypfca11 Ap~lcia1., lilllS Pm eJ -T~Dlll'OnlJrY Tr;;,f:fic Comcl A ' .J. t 10 It ~ I■ I (aptional) Note· S e ,. ti>H-2 and .. ,Bfl--3 for ll'u!i r'rlilar'Ling of (hs symbols srxlfor letter oooos used I I fi.g11.1re. 1!'3 L i A l W:20-1 ROAD Jf0RK ,\~EAO Ncrvember 1 2014 ~at&t * e---1 >--< • --.----_Li_ 2 I ¥ -1' ~ FA ... □ □ □ □ PEARCE ----,.:))SERVICES
GIGAPOWER PROJECTPERMIT PLAN1222 VINE ST., SUITE 301PASO ROBLES, CA 93446Tel: (805) 467-2528 Fax: (805) 467-2529GEO/CO __________________________________EXCHANGE_________________________________ENGR. ________________ TEL. _____________ENGR ARC ________________________________TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ____________________RO/EST. NO. ____________________DWG. ___________OF ___________1 04-2021ISSUEDATETANSATPORTABLE FLASHING BEASCON (P.F.B)TYPE III BARRICADE W/SIGNTYPEMII BARRICADE W/SIGNCHANNELIZING DEVICETRAFFIC CONE WITH CLIP ON SIGNTYPE I W/SIGNEXISTING SIGNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONFLASHING ARROW BOARDHIGH LEVEL WARNING DEVICE (FLAGTREE)FLAGGERTOW AWAY NO STOPPING ANY TIMEEXISTING DRIVEWAYWORK ZONE (ACTIVITY AREA) LIMITSDIRECTION OF TRAFFIC (NOT PAVEMENT MARKING)SLEGEND* - The distances are approximate, are intended for guidance purpasesonly, and should be applied with engineering judgment. These distancesshould be adjusted by the Engineer for filed conditions, if necessary, byincreasing or decreasing the recommended distances.TAPER LENGTH CRITERIA ANDCHANNELIZING DEVICE SPACINGSPEED(S)MINIMUM TAPER LENGTH*FOR WIDTH OF OFFSET 12 FEET (W)MAXIMUM CHANNELIZINGDEVICE SPACINGX Y Z**TANGENT2LMERGINGLSHIFTINGL/2SHOULDERL/3TAPERTANGENT CONFLICTMPH FT FT FT FT FT FT FT20 160 80 40 27 20 40 1025 250 125 63 42 25 50 1230 360 180 90 60 30 601535 490 245 123 82 35 701740 640 320 160 107 40 80 20451080 540 270 1804590 2250 1200 600 300 200 50 100 25551320 660 330 220 50 100 2560 1440 720 360 240 50 100 2565 1560 780 390 260 50 100 2570 1680 840 420 280 50 100 25751800 900 450 300 50 100 25ADVANCE WARNING SIGN SPACINGROAD TYPEDISTANCE BETWEEN SIGNS*A BCFT FT FTURBAN - 25 MPH OR LESS100 100 100URBAN - MORE THAN 25 MPH TO 40 MPH 250 250 250URBAN - MORE THAN 40 MPH350 350 350RURAL500 500 500EXPRESSWAY/FREEWAY1000 1500 2640PEDESTRIAN CONTROL NOTES :A DEDICATED INDIVIDUAL WILL BE ASSIGNED THERESPONSIBILITY OF ESCORTING PEDESTRIANSTHROUGH THE WORK AREA IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHREE MAJOR CONSIDERATIONS:1. PEDESTRIANS SHOULD NOT BE LED INTODIRECT CONFLICT WITH WORK SITE VEHICLES,EQUIPMENT OR OPERATIONS2. PEDESTRIANS SHOULD NOT BE LED INTODIRECT CONFLICT WITH MAINLINE TRAFFICGOING THROUGH OR AROUND THE WORK SITE.3. PEDESTRIANS SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITH AREASONABLY SAFE, CONVENIENT ANDACCESSIBLE PATH THAT REPLICATES ASNEARLY AS PRACTICAL THE MOST DESIRABLECHARACTERISTICS OF THE EXISTINGSIDEWALK OR FOOTPATH.* - For other offsets, use the following merging taper length formula for L:For speed of 40 mph or less, L = WS²/60For speed of 45 mph or more, L = WSWhere: L = Taper length in feetW = Width of offset in feetS = Posted speed limit, off-peak 85th-percentilespeed prior to work starting, or the anticipatedoperating speed in mph** - Use for taper and tangent sections where there are no pavement markings or wherethere is a conflict between existing pavement markings and channelizers (CA).6 6TYPICAL APPLICATION APPLIESFOR MH 333CONSTRUCTION DRAWING/SUBMITTAL REVIEWAPPROVEDAPPROVED WITHCHANGES NOTEDREVISE AND RESUBMITREJECTEDSUBMITTAL WAS REVIEWED FOR DESIGN CONFORMITY ABDGENERAL CONFORMANCE TO MUNICIPAL REQUIREMENTS.BY : _______________ DATE:_______________PERMIT # : ______________DA # 2242LAA01ZFFASNRFCA01W371SMITH, PETER JINDEX:DWG 1. COVER SHEETDWG 2. LAYOUT DRAWINGDWG 3. LAYOUT DETAIL DRAWINGDWG 4. CABINET SPECSDWG 5. TCP TYPICALDWG 6. TCP TYPICALC lifu.mia _ fUTCD _0,1 Edi ·ac. (_FH!JT.A • ~ MUTCD 009 Edrnoo, irdmi5:n.g _ ·-· = 1 & , u am.endelll fllr ros~ tm · · ·olill!11) Figure 6H-24. Hallf Road Closl!.llre on th,e F,a1rSiide cf altiil lme'rs.ectlon (TA-24) W20-1 ~ T .. Arruw bo rd ... -+ W20·1 : Sea Tebles, 6 2 snd '6H-J for the mealli11g cf lite 5-yrnboJ!I ardl'ar lett&I a::deas used iri thi figura. Cm.pt!r 6.H-T)p:till A!!!pl?c.a't:iDIIS Rm ti-e~ 'Thaffi.c. Cootoo. C (optl001!l) G:0-:2 ,.,,.!N:U (OP w I) ... t W.20-1 . ·o-vemb!r , 201 ~at&t * e-----1 >-< • ----.----_u_ 2 ¥ -1' ~ FA ... □ □ □ □ PEARCE -----e))SERVICES