No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCD Environmental Consulting Services for Northgate Mall Redevelopment Application; First AmendmentFIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE NORTHGATE MALL REDEVLOPMENT APPLICATION THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to the Professional Services Agreement by and between the CITY OF SAN RAFAEL (hereinafter "CITY"), and LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. (hereinafter "CONSULTANT"), is made and entered into as of the 16 day of 11 , 202 Y p2 G1P?3 OAJ RECITALS WHEREAS, the CITY and CONSULTANT entered into a Professional Services Agreement dated December 3, 2021 to perform professional services in connection with CITY'S Northgate Mall Redevelopment Application project, for an amount not to exceed $260,350 (the "Agreement"); and WHEREAS, CITY requires additional professional services from the CONSULTANT, and the CONSULTANT is willing to provide such services. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 1. Article II of the Agreement, entitled "DUTIES OF CONSULTANT" is hereby amended to include the additional services set forth in CONSULTANT's proposals dated August 17, 2023 and November 8, 2023, attached to this First Amendment as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. 2. Article IV of the Agreement, entitled "COMPENSATION" is hereby amended to include additional compensation payable to CONSULTANT for the services described in Exhibit A to this First Amendment, on a fixed unit rates basis in accordance with the Exhibit A, in a not -to -exceed amount of $74,606, and to change the total not -to -exceed amount under the Agreement to $334,956. 4. Article V of the Agreement, entitled "TERM OF AGREEMENT" is hereby amended, effective as of August 31, 2022, to extend the Agreement term through December 31, 2024. 3. Except as specifically amended herein, all of the other provisions, terms and obligations of the Agreement between the parties shall remain valid and shall be in full force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment on the day, month, and year first above written. CITY OF SAN RAFAEL CnklE s Alllovich Cristi— Aldovich lNov 16.2023 M 1-4 PST) CRISTINE ALILOVICH, City Manager ATTEST: Bretua� Ncc�ryca f{ ,L Blemld 1Jw m� (lor '! l ov 1? j013 ao I b PST � LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ?, ':� ROBERT F. EPSTEIN, City Attorney 2 CONSULTANT By:� Name: Anthony Petros Title: CEO [If Contractor is a corporation, add signature of second corporate officer] Rv:_ Name: Justin Cary Title: CFO LSA August 17, 2023 Alicia Giudice Community Development Director City of San Rafael 1400 Fifth Avenue San Rafael, CA 94901 Exhibit A CARLSBAD CLOVIS IRVINE LOS ANGELES PALM SPRINGS POINT RICHMOND RIVERSIDE ROSEVILLE SAN LUIS OBISPO Subject. Northgate Mall Redevelopment Project Environmental Review -Contract Modification Request #2 Dear Ali: The purpose of this letter is to formally request a Contract Modification for the Northgate Mall Redevelopment Project environmental review process, which as initiated in October 2021. LSA is requesting additional funds for the following reasons: 1) to complete the work program outlined in Attachment A for out of scope tasks related to preparation of the Transportation section of the EIR and 2) to continue submittal of the Administrative Draft EIR (ADEIR) in a piecemeal fashion. The additional effort and requested budget increase for these tasks is detailed below: ADEIR Transportation Section. As requested by the City, LSA and Parisi/Parametrix will coordinate and perform out of scope tasks to supplement the applicant -prepared Transportation Impact Study and prepare the Transportation section of the EIR. The detailed scope of work is included in Attachment A and includes: 1) an evaluation of the project's impacts on adopted programs, plans, ordinances, and policies addressing the circulation system and 2) a signal warrant analysis. LSA will prepare the initial draft of the EIR section (as assumed in our original scope of work) and then coordinate with Parisi/Parametrix to complete the additional analysis and incorporate into the EIR section prior to submittal to the City. The total cost for this task is $18,456 (Parisi/Parametrix: $15,380 and LSA: $3,076). Continued Partial ADEIR Submittals. Six months ago, in February 2023, the City approved a contract amendment for preparation and submittal of a partial draft of the EIR, to include the following sections: Population and Housing, Visual Resources, Cultural Resources, Tribal Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, and Hazards and Hazardous Materials. These sections have been submitted and comments have been received. It was assumed that the remainder of the Administrative Draft EIR would be submitted once the applicant -prepared technical studies were completed. Since that time, LSA has agreed to prepare and submit EIR sections as they are ready, to further expedite the environmental review process while the applicant continues to finalize required technical studies. To date, LSA has prepared and submitted three additional EIR sections (Introduction, Revised Project Description, and Environmental Setting) and four more are nearly ready for submittal (Public Services, Utilities, Land Use and Planning, and a second draft of the Population and Housing section). Comments on the Population and Housing section in particular, and ongoing discussions related to the baseline assumptions to be used in the EIR, have required revisions to partially -prepared and completed sections 8/27/23 (P:\CSR2001.03 Northgate\ADMIN\Contract\Northgate EIR_ConMod2_081723 doca) 157 Park Place, Pt. Richmond, California 94801 510.236.6810 www.Isa.net LSA of the EIR prior to submittal of the City. Additionally, LSA has received separate sets of non - consolidated comments on several EIR sections. As you are aware, although schedule efficiencies can sometimes be realized with partial ADEIR submittals, the original scope of work and cost estimate assumed that a complete ADEIR would be provided for City review. In LSA's experience, additional quality assurance and quality control time will be required to ensure that the entirety of the Draft EIR is internally consistent prior to publication, as reviewer comments will continue to be submitted piecemeal without the benefit of reviewing the complete document at one time. LSA is requesting additional budget to allow for increased time to consolidate comments, cross-check references across multiple versions, and perform document management tasks (e.g., word processing, acronym and reference checks, formatting) in a piecemeal fashion. It is assumed that the Screencheck Draft will be submitted as a complete document. LSA is requesting the remainder of the contingency funds to cover this task, for a total of $5,870. For the out of scope tasks outlined above, LSA is requesting additional funds in the amount of $24,326. A total of $5,870 of the contract amount is allocated to the remaining contingency fund, which is not to be used without the City's written authorization. With your approval, LSA can utilize the contingency funds to cover the continued Partial ADEIR Submittals task, bringing the total requested increase in the contract to $18,456, for a total contract amount of $278,806. We would be glad to discuss this request further if you have any questions or suggestions. Sincerely, LSA Associates, Inc. Theresa Wallace, AICP Principal Attachment A: Parisi/Parametrix —Additional Tasks Workplan 8/17/23 (P:\C5R2001 03 Northgate\ADMIN\Contract\Northgate EIR_ConMod2_081723 docx) ATTACHMENT A PARISI/PARAMETRIX - ADDITIONAL TASKS WORKPLAN A crnsi� �rl N IMS00411111#(ONS911ING Parametrix August 8, 2023 Theresa Wallace LSA 157 Park Place Pt. Richmond, California 94801 Subject: Northgate Town Center CEQA Transportation Review — Additional Tasks Workplan Dear Ms. Wallace: In accordance with our existing agreement with LSA, Parisi Transportation Consulting (Parisi), a division of Parametrix, Inc., has conducted a review of W-Trans' Transportation Impact Study for the Northgote Town Square Project ("TIS," February 2023). As a result of this review, Parisi has identified two requirements listed in the San Rafael Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines ("TIAG," March 2021 draft version) that were not assessed for potential impacts in the TIS. Pursuant to your request, Parisi is pleased to provide a workplan to execute the additional assessments identified as part of this review. These two tasks are listed below: Task 1: Evaluation of proiect against adopted programs plans ordinances or policies addressing the circulation system The TIS does evaluate the Project for consistency with the San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2018), and finds that the Project would not conflict with aspects of this plan. However, Project consistency with additional adopted plans and policies at various levels of government were not evaluated in the TIS. We propose to conduct the following associated with Task 1: • Identification of adopted programs, plans, ordinances, and policies addressing the circulation system that pertain to the Project, and identification of goals and objectives from these documents that form a regulatory framework for the Project. • Evaluation of the Project for potential conflicts with identified goals and objectives from applicable plans and policies that would constitute a potentially significant transportation -related impact. If any potential impacts are identified, mitigation measures to address impacts will be listed. • Results can either be summarized in a technical memorandum or included in the draft LSA EIR transportation chapter. August 8, 2023 Task 2: Signal warrant analysis The TIS does not evaluate the Project for consistency with the following CEQA threshold of significance listed in the TIAG: Roadway System — The project would create a significant impact related to the roadway system if any of the following criteria are met: At unsignalized intersections, the project results in any of the traffic signal warrants included in the CA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) to be satisfied, or for a location where any of the warrants are satisfied prior to the project, the project increases overall travel through the intersection by more than 1 percent. We propose to perform the traffic signal warrant analysis against this threshold of significance. The TIS includes trip generation results for the Project, which show that the Project would result in an increase in AM peak hour vehicle trips, and a decrease in PM peak hour vehicle trips. Overall vehicle trips would reduce as a result of the Project. The MUTCD includes nine different traffic signal warrants. Of these, the existing traffic volume counts, which reflect the peak hour periods, would be sufficient for use against Warrant 3, Peak Hour. The other eight traffic signal warrants would require either four-hour or eight -hour vehicle counts, or are for situations that are not relevant to the three intersections (e.g. school crossing, intersection near a grade crossing). Furthermore, as the Project would result in reduced overall vehicle trip generation from the site and hence reduce the overall number of vehicles on the roadway network, Warrant 3, Peak Hour will serve as a conservative vehicle volume basis for the signal warrant analysis. Similar to other traffic impact results in the TIS such as queuing and driveway access, the signal warrant analysis will only be performed for the AM peak hour, as the Project would reduce PM peak hour vehicle trips. In order to determine baseline vehicle traffic volumes to assess, this workplan proposes re -calculation of "Baseline" vehicle traffic volumes at the three unsignalized intersections to correct for an errant baseline vehicle volume methodology applied in the TIS. We propose the conduct the signal warrant analysis according to the following steps: • Obtain AM Peak hour traffic counts from the City that were conducted in 2023 for the following unsignalized intersections: o Northgate Drive and Thorndale Drive o Northgate Drive and El Falsan Drive 0 Northgate Drive and Nova Albion Way August 8, 2023 • Obtain vacancy information for the retail land uses on the Project site at the time that traffic counts were taken. • Calculate trip generation of vacant land uses by applying trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 1 11h edition for the same land use type applied in the TIS. • Determine "Baseline" turning volumes at the three unsignalized intersections by imputing vehicle trips that would be generated by vacant land uses onto 2023 vehicle turning volumes, according to existing trip distribution patterns. • Determine "Baseline Plus Project" turning volumes at the three intersections by adding Project -generated vehicle volumes included in the W-Trans analysis. "Future" and "Future Plus Project" vehicle volumes from the W-Trans analysis will be applied directly to the signal warrant analysis. • Perform signal warrant analysis by applying Warrant 3, Peak Hour criteria from MUTCD for the AM peak hour of "Baseline," and "Baseline Plus Project," "Future," and "Future Plus Project" scenarios. • Evaluate warrant analysis results against threshold of significance criteria listed in the TAIL. • If the project results in the satisfaction of the Peak Hour traffic signal warrant at any of the three intersections and would potentially conflict with the threshold of significance for the "Baseline Plus Project" or "Future Plus Project" scenarios, mitigation measures will be suggested, and LSA and the City will be notified for further discussion. • Results will be summarized in a technical memorandum. A draft memorandum will be prepared, and upon receipt of one set of non -contradictory comments, a final memorandum will be prepared for submission. As per the MUTCD, the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant does not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. The results of this analysis will to be used as informing additional consideration and evaluation in consultation with the City. If any of the signal warrants in this analysis is satisfied, Parisi can develop separate work scope to perform additional signal warrant analysis or improvement evaluation. Assumptions It is assumed that Parisi will receive traffic counts at the aforementioned intersections from the City of San Rafael and vacancy information from the site operator in a timely manner to facilitate this analysis. If inputs are not available, the method included in the TIS for determining "Baseline" vehicle traffic volumes will be applied to the analysis. August 8, 2023 Timeline Assuming receipt of authorization to proceed by August 14, 2023, we can conduct the above tasks and prepare a draft memorandum summarizing the results of the two tasks by September 7, 2023. The original scope of work includes Parisi's review and provision of comments on the Administrative Draft and Screencheck Draft (two rounds) of the Transportation EIR section prepared by LSA. This work will still commence upon receipt of the first draft from LSA and is unincumbered by the proposed additional tasks. Estimated Fee Our estimated fee for conducting this work is $15,380 for the services included in the workplan, Parisi will conduct all work on a time -and -material basis. The estimated fee is provided below. Task Principal Consultant Senior Consultant Engineer III Project Controls Subtotal # $310 $230 $145 $150 Parisi 1 Evaluation of project against adopted programs, plans, ordinances or policies addressing the circulations stem 2 24 1 $4,290 2 Signal Warrant Analysis 4 4 72 1 $11,090 Labor Subtotal $15,380 Expenses $0 Total $15,380 Conclusion We look forward to serving Sicular Environmental Consulting on this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, David Parisi, PE, TE Principal Consultant LSA CARLOVIS CLVIS mvinm LOS ANGELES PALM SPRINGS POINT RICHMOND November 8, 2023 RIVERSIDE ROSEVILLE Alicia Giudice SAN LUIS OBISPO Community Development Director City of San Rafael 1400 Fifth Avenue San Rafael, CA 94901 Subject: Northgate Mall Redevelopment Project Environmental Review - Contract Modification Request #3 Dear Ali: The purpose of this letter is to formally request a Contract Modification for the Northgate Mall Redevelopment Project environmental review process, which as initiated in October 2021. LSA is requesting additional funds for the following reasons: 1) to complete preparation of the Public Review Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on an expedited timeline and submittal of draft sections in a piecemeal fashion; 2) for out of scope tasks and a level of effort beyond what was originally anticipated to peer review the Noise Technical Report prepared by the project applicant and complete the Noise section of the EIR; 3) to prepare the staff reports for the Draft and Final EIR hearings; 4) to prepare the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the proposed project; and 5) additional project management and meeting time associated with the aforementioned tasks. The additional effort and requested budget increase for these tasks is detailed below: Expedited Completion of the Public Review Draft EIR. The Draft EIR for the proposed project has been in process for just over 2 years. LSA's original scope of work and schedule assumed a timeline of approximately one year for completion of the environmental review process, and our cost estimate reflected this level of effort. Since initiation of the project, LSA has worked diligently with the City team to conduct the environmental evaluation in a timely manner, including during periods when the project was essentially on pause due to re -designs or delays in receipt of requested information or technical studies upon which the EIR analysis was to be relied upon. Two previous budget augments have been approved by the City to accommodate submittal of the Administrative Draft EIR in a piecemeal fashion which, as explained in those requests, requires additional time and effort. In late September, when approximately only half of the Administrative Draft EIR had been completed and two technical studies were still outstanding (i.e., the Air Quality and Noise reports), the City informed LSA that a publication date for the EIR was desired in mid November (in approximately 6 weeks), or at the earliest possible date. In order to meet this timeline, LSA's Principal and senior level staff have worked closely with the City team to prepare, review, and revise the Administrative, Screencheck, and Printcheck Draft EIR versions on an accelerated timeline. To expedite the timeline and limit internal coordination and rounds of review and editing, which the timeline makes infeasible, senior LSA staff (at higher billing rates) have prepared much of the remaining sections of the EIR and have also made all of the revisions and addressed comments by the City. LSA has also accepted and 11/8/23 (P:\CSR2001 03 Northgate\ADMIN\Contract\Northgate EIR_C—Mod3_110823 docx) 157 Park Place, Pt Richmond, California 94801 510.236.6810 www.Isa.net LSA resolved non -consolidated comments on multiple versions of most of the EIR sections. LSA's Document Management staff (technical editors and format specialists) have also conducted concurrent quality assurance/quality control efforts during City review, creating multiple versions that must be internally consolidated and reviewed multiple times. Additionally, LSA staff have worked evening and weekend hours to meet the schedule, resulting in overtime for non-exempt employees. The total cost for expedited completion of the Public Review Draft EIR is $22,900. Noise Technical Report Peer Review and Noise EIR Section. The level of effort and coordination required to peer review the Noise Technical Report prepared by the applicant's consultant and prepare the Noise EIR section has exceeded the scope and associated cost estimate originally anticipated by LSA. LSA originally assumed that up to two rounds of peer review could be required. However, we have peer reviewed four rounds of the technical report, including partial drafts that did not include the Transportation Impact Study (which needed to be cross checked with the noise analysis) and have attended meetings and coordinated with City staff to discuss deficiencies and potential revisions. This effort is ongoing and the Noise Technical Report has still not been deemed adequate to prepare the EIR analysis. To expedite the schedule, LSA also prepared a draft of the Noise EIR section prior to receiving the latest draft of the Technical Report, and is currently updating and revising the section to conform the latest report revisions. The total cost for this additional effort is $5,450. • Draft EIR and Final EIR Hearing Staff Reports. LSA will prepare the staff reports for the Draft and Final EIR hearings. This task was not included in our original scope of work. The staff reports will follow the City's template and will include: 1) Executive Summary; 2) Recommended Action; 3) Property Facts; 4) Background; 5) Project Description; 6) Summary of Environmental Review Process; 7) Summary of EIR Conclusions including impacts and mitigation measures; 8) Summary of Alternatives; 9) Conclusions/Next Steps; 10) Summary of Correspondence; and 11) Other Miscellaneous Items and Exhibits. It is assumed that the staff report for the Final EIR hearing will be based on and similar to the Draft EIR staff report but will also include a summary of the comments received on the Draft EIR and the responses provided in the Response to Comments document/Final EIR. LSA assumes up to two rounds of comments and revisions would be addressed to finalize each staff report. The total cost for this additional effort is $12,460. • Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations. LSA will prepare the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations document during the Final EIR process. The Findings will include: 1) Introduction and Summary of the Proposed Project; 2) An Overview of the Environmental Review Process; 3) Identification of Significant Unavoidable Impacts; 4) Summary of Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures and Findings of Fact; 5) Summary of Alternatives and Findings of Fact; and 6) Statement of Overriding Considerations. LSA assumes up to two rounds of comments and revisions would be addressed to finalize this document. The total cost for this additional effort is $9,440. • Project Management and Meetings. LSA has been actively engaged in project management activities and regular bi-weekly meetings since October 2021 and past contract modification approvals have increased the budget allocated for these tasks. However, during the past several months, increased coordination and meeting time associated with the accelerated 11/8/23 (P:\CSR2001.03 Northgate\ADMIN\Contract\Northgate EIR_ConMod3_110623 docx) LSA timeline has been required to track the various EIR versions, comments, and submittals and additional weekly team meetings have been added to our scope. The total cost for this additional effort for a duration of approximately two months is $5,900. For the out of scope tasks outlined above, LSA is requesting additional funds in the amount of $56,150, fora total contract amount of $334,956. We would be glad to discuss this request further if you have any questions or suggestions. In order to continue on the expedited timeline, we request that written authorization for the requested contract modification be provided by November 17, 2023. Sincerely, LSA Associates, Inc. Theresa Wallace, AICP Principal 11/8/23 (P:\CSR2001 03 Northgate\ADMIN\Contract\Northgate EIR_ConMod3_110823.docx( CONTRACT ROUTING FORM INSTRUCTIONS: Use this cover sheet to circulate all contracts for review and approval in the order shown below. TO BE COMPLETED BY INITIATING DEPARTMENT PROJECT MANAGER: Contracting Department: City Manager Project Manager: Bernadette Sullivan Extension: 3353 Contractor Name: LSA Associates, Inc. Contractor's Contact: Theresa Wallace Contact's Email: theresa.wallace@lsa.net ❑ FPPC: Check if Contractor/Consultant must file Form 700 Step RESPONSIBLE DESCRIPTION COMPLETED REVIEWER DEPARTMENT a. Email PINS Introductory Notice to Contractor DATE Check/Initial 1 Project Manager L i;.:k ilir: - ' ❑ Cuter a da": b. Email contract (in Word) and attachments to City Click here to Attorney c/o Laraine.Gittens@cityofsanrafael.org +,t, r : cl.+': ❑ 2 City Attorney a. Review, revise, and comment on draft agreement 11/7/2023 and return to Project Manager 11/7/2023 ❑x NT b. Confirm insurance requirements, create Job on Department Director PINS, send PINS insurance notice to contractor ❑X NT 3 Approval of final agreement form to send to 11/14/2023 ❑x contractor - is-4 Project Manager Forward three (3) originals of final agreement to 11/14/2023 C contractor for their signature , 5 Project Manager When necessary, contractor -signed agreement N/A agendized for City Council approval * *City Council approval required for Professional Services Agreements and purchases of goods and services that exceed Or $75,000; and for Public Works Contracts that exceed $175,000 Click Here to Date of City Council approval enter a da}e PRINT CONTINUE ROUTING PROCESS WITH HARD COPY 6 Project Manager Forward signed original agreements to City ( J Attorney with printed copy of this routing form - 7 Attorney Review and approve hard copy of signed agreement FCity 8 City Attorney Review and approve insurance in PINS , and bonds (for Public Works Contracts) 9 City Manager / Mayor Agreement executed by City Council authorized official Attest signatures, retains original agreement and 10 City Clerk forwards copies to Project Manager LSA Associates 1 st Amendment to PSA- Northgate Mall -Environmental Consulting Final Audit Report 2023-11-16 Created: 2023-11-15 By: Laraine Gittens (laraine.gittens@cityofsanrafael.org) Status: Signed Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAiWKnkmSvYRB305-dYlg3FtEdbJbJScD9 "LSA Associates 1 st Amendment to PSA-Northgate Mall-Environ mental Consulting" History n Document created by Laraine Gittens (laraine.gittens@cityofsanrafael.org) 2023-11-15 - 7:14:02 PM GMT- IP address: 199.88.113.8 El Document emailed to Genevieve Coyle (genevieve.coyle@cityofsanrafael.org) for signature 2023-11-15 - 7:21:30 PM GMT Email viewed by Genevieve Coyle (genevieve.coyle@cityofsanrafael.org) 2023-11-15 - 8:10:25 PM GMT- IP address: 104.47.64.254 GS© Document e-signed by Genevieve Coyle (genevieve.coyle@cityofsanrafael.org) Signature Date: 2023-11-15 - 8:14:46 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 199.88.113.8 E-y Document emailed to cristine.alilovich@cityofsanrafael.org for signature 2023-11-15 - 8:14:52 PM GMT Email viewed by cristine.alilovich@cityofsanrafael.org 2023-11-16 - 4:13:59 PM GMT- IP address: 104.47.64.254 d0 Signer cristine.alilovich@cityofsanrafael.org entered name at signing as Cristine Alilovich 2023-11-16 - 4:14:29 PM GMT- IP address: 73.170.251.162 b� Document e-signed by Cristine Alilovich (cristine.alilovich@cityofsanrafael.org) Signature Date: 2023-11-16 - 4:14:31 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 73.170.251.162 I 4 Document emailed to Brenna Nurmi (brenna.nurmi@cityofsanrafael.org) for signature 2023-11-16 - 4:14:36 PM GMT '5 Email viewed by Brenna Nurmi (brenna.nurmi@cityofsanrafael.org) 2023-11-16 - 4:14:47 PM GMT- IP address: 104.47.65.254 13 Adobe Acrobat Sign d© Signer Brenna Nurmi (brenna.nurmi@cityofsanrafael.org) entered name at signing as Brenna Nurmi (for) 2023-11-16 - 4:16:51 PM GMT- IP address: 199.88.113.8 do Document e-signed by Brenna Nurmi (for) (brenna.nurmi@cityofsanrafael.org) Signature Date: 2023-11-16 - 4:16:53 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 199.88.113.8 E'y Document emailed to brenna.nurmi@cityofsanrafael.org for approval 2023-11-16 - 4:16:57 PM GMT Email viewed by brenna.nurmi@cityofsanrafael.org 2023-11-16 - 4:17:24 PM GMT- IP address: 104.47.65.254 4 Signer brenna.nurmi@cityofsanrafael.org entered name at signing as Brenna Nurmi 2023-11-16 - 4:17:34 PM GMT- IP address: 199.88.113.8 40 Document approved by Brenna Nurmi (brenna.nurmi@cityofsanrafael.org) Approval Date: 2023-11-16 - 4:17:36 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 199.88.113.8 Agreement completed. 2023-11-16 - 4:17:36 PM GMT 0 Adobe Acrobat Sign