HomeMy WebLinkAboutPW Presentation from the Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transporation District on the San Rafael Transit Center PPTSan Rafael City Council Presentation
March 4, 2024
1
Agenda
•Project Background
•Recent Project Progress
•2023 Public Engagement Activities
•Project Design Update
•Key Coordination Topics and Next Steps
2
•Over 700 daily bus trips, an increase since 2019
•9,000 daily boardings and alightings serving equally as an access point to Downtown San Rafael and as a transfer point between services
•Large contingent of transit center users are essential workers who have continued to rely on transit through pandemic and will continue to rely on transit in future
3
Population
Group
Riders on
Routes
Serving
Transit Center
City of San
Rafael
General
Population
Marin County
Population
Household
Income
Less than $50k
45%31%25%
Minority
(non-white)69%33%29%
Role of the Transit Center
Why a New Transit Center is Needed
4
Third Street serves as a major barrier
for pedestrian access and transfers to
SMART
Congestion on 2nd Street makes it
challenging for buses to exit transit
center, increasing travel times and
impacting reliabilityTransit center access configuration
requires extensive out-of-direction travel
for buses, impacting traffic congestion
and increasing operating costs
SMART tracks bisecting transit center
impacts pedestrian circulation and
access, increasing transfer times and
making wayfinding difficult
Construction of SMART
tracks impacted ability to
access several bus bays,
limiting flexibility and
usability of transit center
Current transit center was built 30
years ago, lacks sufficient space for
customer service, and needs
technology, sustainability, and user
comfort improvements
Transit center has
insufficient space for pick-
up/drop-off, shuttles,
taxis, and bike parking
Existing Safety Need
5
Existing Transit
Center
6
SRTC Replacement Project
Overall Anticipated Project Schedule
7
Current stage
Recent Project Progress
•December 2022:FEIR Adopted
•February-December 2023:Community Design Advisory Group and
Public Meetings
•June 2023 -Current:Began Preparing NEPA Checklist and Re-
engaged FTA
•July 2023 -Current:
•Advance Design Discussions with City of San Rafael and
Marin Transit
•Advance Preliminary Design and Engineering
8
9
RECONOCIMIENTO;
VISIÓN +
PRINCIPIOS
“GRANDES
GESTOS”
DESARROLLO DEL
CONCEPTO
IMPLEMENTACIÓN;
INFORME
2023 Public Engagement Activities
RECONNAISSANCE;
VISION +
PRINCIPLES
BIG MOVES CONCEPT
DEVELOPMENT
IMPLEMENTATION;
REPORT-BACK
CDAG #2
JULY 25, 2023
San Rafael City Hall
OPEN HOUSE
Dec. 6, 2023
OPEN HOUSE
AUG. 15, 2023
CDAG #3
SEPT. 12, 2023
San Rafael City Hall
CDAG #1
JUNE 20, 2023
Jackson Cafe
CDAG #4
OCT. 17, 2023
Virtual
CANAL ALLIANCE
FACEBOOK LIVE
AUG. 10, 2023
CANAL ALLIANCE
FACEBOOK LIVE
NOV. 30, 2023
10
2023 Public Engagement Activities
Community Open House:
Open House #1
-Attended by more than 50 people
-Received a total of 158 written comments
-Additional online survey received 119
responses
Open House #2
-Attended by more than 60 people
-Received a total of 130 written comments
10
11
RECONOCIMIENTO;
VISIÓN +
PRINCIPIOS
“GRANDES
GESTOS”
DESARROLLO DEL
CONCEPTO
2023 Public Engagement Activities
Partnership with the Canal Alliance
Facebook Live Event #1 - (8/10/2023)
-Participated by 33 attendees
-Received over 40 comments on the feed
-Viewed by 1,100 people to-date
Facebook Live Event #2 - (11/30/23)
-Participated by 32 attendees
-Received 30 comments on the feed
-Viewed by 1,200 people to-date
In-Person Promotoras Outreach
-Total of 51 hours of outreach in Spanish
at peak transit times
-Distributed over 950 palm cards
11
Community Design Advisory Group (CDAG)
Brought a balanced and diverse group of voices together to discuss and provide
input on the design, aesthetics, amenities and features of the new transit
center.
Conducted a field walk of the existing transit center and the new site
Served as a conduit between the District and the community
Met four times over five months: June through October 2023
12
2023 Public Engagement Activities
12
Example Comments from Transit Riders
•“Accessibility is a priority”
•“Green Areas. Family areas. Good
bus service. Rain protection”
•“I would like long lighted canopies
that protect from the wind, sun
and rain”
•“More safety”
13
Transit Rider Priorities –Key Themes
•Amenities like restrooms, water fountains, phone
charging, bike parking
•Safety and security, e.g. visibility, cameras, etc.
•Shelter from sun, wind and rain
•Greenery, including London plain trees –but
balanced with shelters and seating
•Comfort & access, e.g. benches with arm rests to
accommodate seniors
•Inclusive of extended families, disabled persons &
different body sizes
•Signage –bilingual, directional signage and real
time arrival/departure signage
•Gathering place for families, friends, events
14
Community Design Advisory Group (CDAG)
Outcome: Central Courtyard with Open Arcade
•Courtyard provides more opportunities for placemaking and program; supports
safety & security
•Potential for shade and weather protection
•Family-friendly
•Courtyard can be secured at night
15
Example look and feel
Community Design Advisory Group (CDAG)
Outcome: Bus Canopy Look and Feel
•Warm materials like wood and brick (where pragmatic)
•Wood is reflective of Marin history and culture
•Light and airy
•Must provide substantial shelter
•Opportunity to create a gateway to downtown
16
Public Engagement Outcome: Northwestern
Pacific (NWP) Railroad Depot Building Reuse
•Widely varying opinions from community members
•Interest in retaining 1929 features or reconstructing original building
•Interest in building an all-new building, without NWP Depot elements
17
Northwestern Pacific Railroad Depot
~1935
“Whistlestop”
Today
View from 4th St. at train tracks, looking southwest
Northwestern Pacific Railroad Depot “Whistlestop”
Laser Scanning + Conditions Analysis
18
Northwestern Pacific Railroad Depot “Whistlestop”
Laser Scanning
19
1929 West
Façade
1929 East Façade –
originally partially
open “arcade”,
later filled in by the
Railroad
1929 Shaped
Mission Parapet,
relocated onto
1982 addition
Angle of 1982
gabled roof is
same angle as
original
1940’s-1950’s
Railroad addition
Integrating NWP Railroad History
•Extending the transportation function of original building –creating a sense of place and a sustainable future
•Reuse building elements from early railroad era that still exist
•Incorporate elements similar to early railroad era, e.g. signage and lighting
•Newly constructed building elements echo original building, e.g. roof lines, facade elements
•Do not “reconstruct” original building (per guidance from US Department of the Interior)
•Remain within existing environmental approvals
Sources: San Rafael Heritage, Vivalon, Mill Valley Public Library, Marin History Museum, Marin County Free Library, Calisphere (UC archives), David Rumsey Historical Map Collection
20
~1955
1935
Preserving Heritage Elements to Maintain a Sense of
History from the Early Railroad Days
East Side of the Northwest Pacific Depot / Customer Service Building
1.The original 1929 Depot
entry will become the main
entry to the new public
lobby
2.The original 1929 “arcade”
will become the edge of a
new public courtyard
3.Reintroduction of Railroad
signage and lighting
4.The Railroad filled in this
part of the “arcade” in
1951. This wall will house a
new café/retail space
Color of stucco is intended to
align with original building (to
be confirmed)
1 2 43
~1945
21
Preserving Heritage Elements to Maintain a Sense of
History from the Early Railroad Days
North Side of the Northwest Pacific Depot / Customer Service Building
1.The original 1929 Depot
“arcade” will become a café
2.New north façade will echo
the 1929 façade
3.New roof line will echo
1929 roof line, with
potential reuse of roof tiles
4.West façade to be
incorporated largely as-is,
with 1929 elements
22
1 2 3 4
22
Add crosswalk and tactile
paving (both sides of
SMART)
remove
Per recent board meetings I
suggest adding more detail
to SMART platforms. I
added ramps and
equipment platforms (all
four sides). Use a light gray
(lighter than roads) instead
of white.
Please use the same tree
symbol as in the plaza,
but at the same size as
these. These look like
bushes.
We will get you a more
representative shape for
the canopy
KH to confirm tactile strips
(typical)
Label PASSENGER PICKUP
AND DROP OFF
If we’re showing tables and
chairs, should we show
benches too?
Change to
brick hatch
The three small shelters
should not overhang into
the street
Bus shelter should move north so that it
provides coverage at doors to buses. One
tree to move south. KH to confirm.
23
24
Indicative Courtyard Options/Opportunities
View of the Plaza from 4th St., Looking South 25
Indicative Plaza Design Rendering
Benches with
armrests
Brick paving; use
of warm colors
Bike parking
adjacent to entry
1929 Façade
relocated
Balance of paving
and greenery
Tables and chairs
near café Clear lines of
sight
London plane
trees
26View of the Customer Service Building from Tamalpais Ave., Looking South
Indicative Customer Service Building Rendering
1929 Façade
relocated
Brick paving; use
of warm colors
London plane
trees
Two-way bike route
(strategy TBD)
Benches with
armrests
27View of the Bus Canopy from Hetherton at 4th Street
Indicative Bus Canopy Rendering
Mass timber
structure Real-time
signage
Protection from
elements; gateway
to downtown
Pedestrian
crosswalks
Street trees on
Hetherton
Benches with
armrests
Security kiosk
(behind)
Line of sight to
SMART, buses,
building
Proposed Pedestrian Improvements
28
Intersection
Bulbout & Directional
Curb Ramps
Intersection
Bulbouts
Exclusive
pedestrian phase,
no right-turn on
red
Pedestrian Level
Lighting
Directional Curb
Ramps
Directional
Curb Ramps
New LPI
New Leading
Pedestrian
Intervals (LPI)
Improved
Sidewalk
Reconfigure
Crosswalk
Reconfigure
CrosswalkHigh Visibility
Crosswalk
High Visibility
Crosswalks (all
legs)
High Visibility
Crosswalks (all
legs)
Proposed Bicycle Network Improvements
29
2nd to 3rd St
Bike Path
3rd to 4th St
Bike Path
4th St
Crossing
Proposed Bicycle Parking
•Secure Bike Parking: 10 bike locker spaces near 3rd Street –adjacent to the Customer Service Building. Secure space for additional 20 bikes allocated.
•Short-term Bike Parking: 20 bike rack spaces at three different locations near the entrance and throughout the plaza
30
Bike Lockers
Bike Racks
Key Ongoing Coordination Topics
•Allocation of Responsibilities for Tamalpais Avenue (City of
San Rafael)
•North-South Greenway Configuration (City)
•Design Review Process (City)
•Street crossing design (California Public Utilities Commission,
City, SMART, Marin Transit)
•Bus Bay Configuration (Marin Transit)
•Cultural Resources Analysis (Federal Transit Administration,
City)
31
Next Steps
•Presentations (Jan-Mar 2024):
•Marin Transit, SMART, and TAM Boards
•San Rafael City Council
•San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
•Advance preliminary engineering (Winter/Spring 2024)
•Additional round of community engagement (Summer 2024)
•Obtain NEPA Clearance (in progress)
•Begin ROW procurement (after NEPA clearance)
•District to procure Final Design contract (End of 2024)
32