HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Minutes 2009-04-06SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04/06/2009 Page 1
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, MONDAY, APRIL 6, 2009 AT 8:00 P.M.
Regular Meeting: Present: Albert J. Boro, Mayor
San Rafael City Council Barbara Heller, Vice -Mayor
Greg Brockbank, Councilmember
Cyr N. Miller, Councilmember
Absent: Damon Connolly, Councilmember
Also Present: Ken Nordhoff, City Manager
Robert F. Epstein, City Attorney
Esther C. Beirne, City Clerk
OPEN SESSION — COUNCIL CHAMBER — 6:00 PM
Mayor Boro announced Closed Session item.
CLOSED SESSION — CONFERENCE ROOM 201 — 6:00 PM
1. Conference with Labor Negotiators— Government Code Section 54957.6(a)
Negotiators: Jim Schutz, Leslie Loomis, Cindy Mosser, Rob Epstein, Ken Nordhoff
Employee Organization(s):
San Rafael Fire Chief Officers' Assn. Western Council of Engineers
San Rafael Firefighters' Assn. Assn. of Confidential Employees
San Rafael Police Mid -Management Assn. SEIU Miscellaneous & Supervisory
San Rafael Police Association SEIU Child Care Unit
Unrepresented Management
Unrepresented Mid -Management
Elected City Clerk and Elected Part -Time City Attorney
City Attorney Robert Epstein announced that no reportable action was taken.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS OF AN URGENCY NATURE: 8:05 PM
AB 68 and AB 87 =- Single Use Carrvout Baq Leqislation: - File 116 x 9-1
Roger Roberts reported that AB 68 and AB 87, both of which address single use carryout bags, were before the State
Assembly, and would impose a 25 -cent fee for the use of such bags. Noting the two bills would undoubtedly be merged, he
stated that a hearing was scheduled before the Assembly Natural Resources Committee on April 13, at which the bills would
be discussed. He indicated he had discussions regarding these bills with Mr. Nordhoff, City Manager, in his capacity as
Executive Committee Member, as well as member of the JPA for Hazardous Waste and Solid Waste Management Board for
the County. Mr. Roberts noted that the AB 939 Local Task Force, a committee of that JPA, passed a resolution in support of
this legislation and was requesting the Executive Committee and JPA to write letters of support. The Board of Supervisors
and Marin Conservation League had provided letters of support and a number of other entities throughout the state were in
support of this legislation.
Councilmember Brockbank stated he understood that when Fairfax tried to ban plastic bags they determined they could have
legal exposure unless it was passed by a vote of the people, which it was. He commented that this was the first time he had
heard of a state bill, which he assumed did not have that problem.
Mr. Roberts confirmed it was not a ban rather a 25 -cent fee for the use of single use carryout bags and therefore, would not
be subject to objections raised on bans. He noted that Fairfax passed an Initiative and Initiative led bans were not subject to
review. Should this legislation pass and was executed into law, the bill would take effect, and the moneys would be used to
deal with the litter problem caused by bags and also to pay for the collection and setting up of the program, etc. He
commented that it was a comprehensive bill and deserved support.
Councilmember Brockbank inquired as to City procedure in such a situation.
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04-06/2009 Page 1
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04/06/2009 Page 2
Mr. Nordhoff stated that his office tracks bills on behalf of MCCMC (Marin County Council of Mayors and Councilmembers)
and the City and a legislative report on bills of significance to the City is brought to the City Council. He noted the Executive
Committee of the Solid Waste JPA would meet next week and would consider some action on this issue. He confirmed that
staff would prepare a report for the City Council based on their findings.
Mr. Roberts explained that the main difference between the bills was the extent of the retail establishments covered under
the bills. AB 68 did not reach as far as AB 87 and AB 87 does a better job of describing what is meant by single -use carryout
bags, which is done as a matter of definition in terms of the gauge of the plastic or paper used.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Councilmember Miller moved and Councilmember Brockbank seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar as follows.
ITEM
Approval of Minutes of Regular City Council Meetings of
March 2 and 16, 2009 (CC)
Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute
Amendment #2 to an Agreement for Professional
Services with RBF Consulting to Complete the
Preparation of An Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
for the San Rafael Target Store Project at the Shoreline
Center, Increasing the Maximum Contract Amount by
$8,500 (From $309,602.00 to $318,102.00) and
Extending the Term of the Agreement Through
December 31, 2009 (CD) — File 4-3-471
4. FY 2007/2008 Annual Financial Audit Report; the Gann
Appropriation Limit Report; the Single Audit Report and
the Memorandum on Internal Control Structure (Fin) —
File 8-1 x 8-9 x 9-3-21
Report on Information Technology Strategic Plan (MS) —
File 9-3-88 x 9-3-87
10. Adopt Plans and Specifications for the Dominican/Black
Canyon Neighborhood Landscaping Project, Project
#11059, and Authorizing the City Clerk to call for Bids
(PW) — File 4-1-609
11. Resolution Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute an Amendment to the Cooperative Agreement
Between the County of Marin and City of San Rafael to
Add $300,000 in Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Funds for ADA Improvements to Public Facilities
within the City of San Rafael (PW) — File 4-13-38 x 147
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Minutes approved as submitted.
RESOLUTION NO. 12682 —
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT
NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH RBF
CONSULTING FOR ASSISTANCE NEEDED
TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SAN RAFAEL
TARGET STORE PROJECT AT
SHORELINE CENTER (Term of Agreement:
from December 31, 2008 — December 31,
2009 for an amount not to exceed
$318,102.00)
Accepted Reports and Memorandum on
Internal Control Structure.
Accepted report.
Approved staff recommendation.
RESOLUTION NO. 12683 —
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND
AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE COUNTY OF MARIN AND CITY OF
SAN RAFAEL TO ADD $300,000 IN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS FOR ADA
IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC FACILITIES
WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04-06/2009 Page 2
12. Resolution Authorizing the Temporary Closure of City
Streets for the 22nd Annual Borrrelli's May Madness
Classic Car Parade on Saturday, May 9, 2009 (RA) —
File 11-19
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04/06/2009 Page 3
RESOLUTION NO. 12684 —
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF CITY
STREETS FOR THE 22ND ANNUAL GREG
BORRELLI'S MAY MADNESS CLASSIC
CAR PARADE ON MAY 9, 2009
13. Resolution Authorizing the Temporary Closure of City
RESOLUTION NO. 12685 —
Streets for the Youth in Arts Italian Street Painting
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
Festival on June 13-14, 2009 (RA) — File 11-19
TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF CITY
STREETS FOR THE YOUTH IN ARTS
ITALIAN STREET PAINTING FESTIVAL
2009 ON JUNE 13 — 14, 2009
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Brockbank, Heller,
Miller & Mayor Boro
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Connolly
ABSTAINING: COUNCILMEMBERS: Heller, from minutes of 3/16/09 only, due to absence from meeting.
The following items were removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion, at the request of Mr. Perry
Litchfield:
5. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS FOR
UNREPRESENTED MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES ("MANAGERS") (EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2009
THROUGH JUNE 30, 2010) (MS)
6. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS FOR
UNREPRESENTED MID -MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES ("MID -MANAGERS") (EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2009
THROUGH JUNE 30, 2010) (MS)
7. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE COMPENSATION AND WORKING CONDITIONS FOR THE
ELECTED CITY CLERK AND ELECTED PART-TIME CITY ATTORNEY (EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2009
THROUGH JUNE 30, 2010) (MS)
8. RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY FINANCE DIRECTOR TO WITHHOLD
FIVE PERCENT (5%) OF THE MONTHLY COMPENSATION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
DURING FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010 AND TO DONATE SAID FUNDS INTO THE CITY'S GENERAL FUND
(MS)
With regard to the 5% pay cut or work furlough for Management, Mid -Management, City Clerk and City
Attorney and the Mayor and City Council Mr. Perry Litchfield respectfully suggested that this action was
premature. Noting the City Council enacted a comprehensive Recession Action Plan and Economic Vitality
Plan on March 16, 2009, Mr. Litchfield stated his impression was that more attention was being paid to the
Recession Action Plan as opposed to the Economic Vitality Plan. He suggested that perhaps best efforts
should be directed towards Economic Vitality before resorting to the Recession Action Plan that resulted in
cutting the salaries of top level people across the board at the City. Noting the City had very good talent in its
elected officials and those running departments, both at Management and Mid -Management levels, Mr.
Litchfield believed this was a good time to reflect upon how departments were running and do what was
necessary to reorganize and get them running more efficiently, rather than working less, which the furlough
program suggested. He commented that in reality these dedicated employees would not work less.
Indicating that these were deep recessionary times, Mr. Litchfield stated the storm would be over, and while
the City was running into a deficit, it paled in comparison to the state and federally. When times did turn
around the lesson to be learned was to take the opportunity to achieve higher reserves to weather through
storms that came along, noting no one could predict a storm this violent.
Mr. Litchfield expressed concern that sending the message now that staff time and salaries were being cut
was not the correct one. He assumed this would trickle down the scale to other very good employees in the
City. As a citizen and businessman of San Rafael, Mr. Litchfield stated he did not want to see citizens suffer
lesser services from the City during a recessionary cycle when things could be turned around at a later date.
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04-06/2009 Page 3
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04/06/2009 Page 4
He noted good suggestions set forth in the Economic Vitality Plan that when implemented could help make
the City a more efficient operation.
Mr. Litchfield requested trying other alternatives prior to cutting salaries.
Expressing appreciation for Mr. Litchfield's comments, Mayor Boro stated that this issue had been looked at
for quite a while -- there was a whole series of steps over the next month or two to be taken in order to
achieve the anticipated $3 million cut. The items before the City Council this evening for approval had been
discussed previously and he noted others would follow. With regard to the Economic Vitality Plan, staff would
work with the Chamber of Commerce, Business Improvement District and private developers; however, this
would take time. A lot of things would not come through in the next twelve months, starting this fiscal year;
therefore, prudent steps would need to be taken to ensure getting through this coming fiscal year with a
balanced budget.
Commenting that the decisions were not easy to make, Mayor Boro believed staff had been working towards
putting steps in place to present a balanced budget to vote on in July, 2009 and delaying this would not result
in a balanced budget. Reserves were at 5% of the actual 10% goal and he did not believe it prudent to take
any more funds from reserves to balance the budget. Mayor Boro believed therefore, that this was one of the
steps necessary going forward.
Noting the City Council had worked on this issue for a considerable period of time, Councilmember
Brockbank stated that the steps being taken were in an appropriately determined sequence. He confirmed
that if by some slim chance the economy did turn around in six or eight months nothing would prevent the
City from cancelling this action.
Mr. Nordhoff commented that bringing these items early on was borne out of leadership demonstrated by the
City Manager, Department Directors, Mid -Managers and Elected Officials in recognizing the severity of the
problem. The Recession Action Plan noted that twelve positions had been left vacant. He noted some
creative service delivery, i.e., contracting out fire dispatching and sharing battalion chief services with
Larkspur. He indicated it was felt at the management level that these items should be presented to the City
Council to demonstrate the seriousness of the problem and that they wanted to be contributors and leaders in
this effort. Reporting that more would come, Mr. Nordhoff stated there would be plenty of opportunities to re-
examine this evening's actions and determine whether it would sunset early, continue longer or just last the
scheduled year. He stated it was clear that the efforts under the Economic Vitality Plan would take a couple
of years to show real tax revenues and changes; therefore, this was a good incentive to act on the resolutions
before the City Council this evening.
Councilmember Miller moved and Councilmember Heller seconded, to adopt the Resolutions.
5) RESOLUTION NO. 12687 — RESOLUTION REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 12615 AND ADOPTING A
NEW RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE COMPENSATION AND
WORKING CONDITIONS FOR UNREPRESENTED MANAGEMENT
EMPLOYEES ("MANAGERS") (effective July 1, 2009 through June 30,
2010) — File 7-3
6) RESOLUTION NO. 12688 — RESOLUTION REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 12614 AND ADOPTING A
NEW RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE COMPENSATION AND
WORKING CONDITIONS FOR UNREPRESENTED MID -MANAGEMENT
EMPLOYEES ("MID -MANAGERS") (effective July 1, 2009 through June
30, 2010) — File 7-3
7) RESOLUTION NO. 12689 — RESOLUTION REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 12616 AND ADOPTING A
NEW RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE COMPENSATION AND
WORKING CONDITIONS FOR THE ELECTED CITY CLERK AND
ELECTED PART-TIME CITY ATTORNEY (effective July 1, 2009 through
June 30, 2010) — File 9-3-14 x 9-3-16 x 7-3-2
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04-06/2009 Page 4
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04/06/2009 Page 5
8) RESOLUTION NO. 12690 — RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY FINANCE
DIRECTOR TO WITHHOLD FIVE (5%) PERCENT OF THE MONTHLY
COMPENSATION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS DURING
FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 AND TO DONATE SAID FUNDS INTO THE
CITY'S GENERAL FUND — File 7-3-2 x 9-1
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Brockbank, Heller, Miller & Mayor Boro
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Connolly
SPECIAL PRESENTATION:
14. INTRODUCTION OF DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY II, LISA GOLDFIEN (CA) - FILE
City Attorney Robert Epstein introduced Lisa Goldfien, Deputy City Attorney II. — File 9-3-16
APPEAL HEARING:
15. Appeal Hearinq — 1050 CRESTA WAY (INCLUDES 1010-1065 CRESTA WAY; 122-150 CRESTA DRIVE; 1-6
CRESTA CIRCLE) — HIGHLANDS OF MARIN AND CREST MARIN APARTMENTS — APPEAL OF PLANNING
COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY THE APPEAL AND UPHOLD THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL AND DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FOR EXTERIOR RENOVATION OF APARTMENT
BUILDINGS, CARPORTS, A RECREATION BUILDING AND REPLACEMENT OF AN EXISTING TENNIS
COURT WITH A NEW 2,785 SQ. FT. LEASING OFFICE BUILDING; APN: 155-251-20,21,24,25, AND 155-280-
01 THROUGH 16 AND 18; PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) 1547 AND MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (MR2.5)
DISTRICT, NORTHBAY PROPERTIES II, LP, PROPERTY OWNER; JILL D. WILLIAMS, ARCHITECT,
APPLICANT; DAVID THERIEN, DENNY MCGINNIS AND EUGENE DOUGHERTY, APPELLANTS; CASE
NUMBER: AP08-004 (CD) (Continued from meeting of March 2, 2009) — File 10-7 x 10-2 x 273
Planning Manager Paul Jensen stated that he would present a summary of what had transpired since March 2,
2009. He reported that at that meeting, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the Highlands of Marin
project, located north of Smith Ranch Road and consisting of two contiguous apartment complexes. The
improvements included a renovation of the property and renovation of units. Following closure of the public
hearing, the City Council discussed the project, primarily focusing on the tenant displacement issue, but concluded
that the City's extent of discretion was limited to the current City Code provision for relocation assistance to
qualifying low-income households. However, the City Council continued the project for 30 days, to this evening,
providing a directive to the project sponsor to meet and work with the tenants of the complex in an effort to address
issues, to complete a Resident Communication Plan, which was presented at the last meeting, and to consider
possible additional relocation measures.
Mr. Jensen stated that following the March 2, 2009 meeting, the project sponsor initiated outreach to both the
tenants and the appellants and he summarized what had occurred in that timeframe as follows:
The property owners distributed individual letters to all tenants of both apartment complexes providing
information to address the conditions of their specific building and their unit. Copies of the sample letters
were attached to the staff report. The letters included the construction schedule, project unit vacancy dates
and projected rents for renovated units, as well as information on temporary relocation assistance on site.
Mr. Jensen reported that the letters also offered individual meetings to be held with tenants and the
property owner. 24 tenants had individual meetings with the property owner to discuss their personal
conditions and needs.
Mr. Jensen reported that two community meetings were held back to back, which collectively drew
approximately nine tenants. The primary purpose of these meetings was to respond to questions
concerning the construction schedule timing and relocation logistics. Several meetings were also held
between the appellant and property owner to discuss potential relocation issues over and above those
summarized in the staff report.
• Indicating that there was no specific resolution to these meetings in terms of changes in conditions, Mr.
Jensen stated, however, that some additional measures were offered by the property owner, as
summarized in the staff report:
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04-06/2009 Page 5
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04/06/2009 Page 6
o A refund of security deposit for units to be vacated, with an expeditious processing of the refund;
o One month's free rent for tenants temporarily relocated within the project and who wished to sign
a lease for a renovated unit —they also were placed on a priority list;
o Offer to hire a full-time tenant coordinator, subsequent to action by the City.
Mr. Jensen reported that the project sponsor did reject two proposals presented by the appellants:
• A request for relocation assistance to all tenants in the complex;
• Request to allow tenants to request relocation assistance prior to the 60 -day notice of vacation, which was
the requirement of the City Code.
Mr. Jensen reported that the Resident Communication Plan was updated per the request of the City Council using
the April 6, 2009 date as a baseline or benchmark for their construction schedule.
Mr. Jensen noted that the City Council received an email from the appellant last Friday, which responds to a
number of points discussed in the meetings with the property owner. He indicated that the email responses did not
present any new information or additional measures discussed among the parties. They were beyond the scope of
the City's discretion, i.e., issues discussed among themselves; however, beyond what the City could require.
Mr. Jensen reported that a letter was also received today through the City Clerk's office from one of the tenants,
again requesting the City Council to reconsider the requirement for a pre 60 -day allowance for relocation
assistance.
Mr. Jensen stated that the project sponsor had responded to the directive of the City Council, and with the
exception of the confirmation of the revised Resident Communication Plan, summarized in the staff report, there
were no changes to the recommended conditions of approval. The draft resolution was ready for City Council
consideration.
Mayor Boro noted that the public hearing on this item had been closed; however, should anyone have a question
for clarity it could be entertained, and as indicated at the last meeting, it was not intended to discuss conversations
between the two parties in an attempt to arbitrate them. The staff report was clear in what could and could not be
done and the final disposition.
Dave Therien, appellant, stated that the idea of a moratorium on any aspect of the project that would displace
residents had been mentioned at the last hearing. Mr. Brown articulated that this was within the City's purview
and authority to implement and although it would need to be citywide, it could be stipulated by class or type of
property. Noting that at the end of the hearing there were no deliberations on that topic, he requested that the City
Council at its pleasure consider this once again. Mr. Therien stated that approximately 380 people would be
displaced and in the current economic times, this was a hardship that was difficult to take. He commented that
tenants were basically funding the owner's renovation plan and he again requested a moratorium.
Mayor Boro thanked staff, the applicant and the neighbors for taking the time to air their issues privately as well as
publicly and in going through the staff report it was obvious that all the City had the ability to do had been done.
The question of a moratorium was a matter for the City Council should they choose to pursue the issue. While it
was raised at the last meting there was no discussion, and although it would be a pretty severe issue to take on,
should anyone wish to discuss the matter it could be done.
Councilmember Brockbank stated that when the issue was continued a month ago it was hoped that the parties
could arrive at a mutual agreement, although it was realized there was a distinct possibility they could not; it could
have been that the tenants wanted more than the owners were willing to give. He noted Mr. Therien's email dated
April 3, 2009 indicated that UDR had been unwilling to yield any additional monetary assistance or convenience to
tenants beyond what was required by the law or City ordinance. Depending on how this was defined,
Councilmember Brockbank stated it sounded as though UDR had granted some things, albeit not as many as the
tenants would have liked.
Recalling two items requested a month ago — more concessions and more clarity and communication,
Councilmember Brockbank stated it sounded as though UDR focused on one and the tenants on the other. While
complete agreement was not reached -- the tenants still requested more concessions and the applicants indicated
they had complied and provided more communication — he indicated he was ready to state that the applicant had
met his burden. Although it was difficult not to be sympathetic, people on a month-to-month tenancy lived with the
risk of eviction, for whatever reason, and this was an unfortunate but legal reason.
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04-06/2009 Page 6
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04/06/2009 Page 7
Councilmember Brockbank moved and Councilmember Miller seconded to adopt the Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 12686 — RESOLUTION DENYING AN APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING
COMMISSION'S ACTION AFFIRMING THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S
CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL AND DESIGN
REVIEW PERMIT (ED08-011) FOR EXTERIOR RENOVATION OF
APARTMENT BUILDINGS, CARPORTS, A RECREATION BUILDING AND
REPLACEMENT OF AN EXISTING TENNIS COURT WITH A NEW 2,785 SQ.
FT. LEASING OFFICE BUILDING AT THE HIGHLANDS OF MARIN
APARTMENT COMPLEX (HOM I AND 11) LOCATED AT 1050 CRESTA WAY
(APN: 155-251-20, 21, 24, 25 AND 155-280-01 THROUGH 16 AND 18)
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Brockbank, Heller, Miller & Mayor Boro
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Connolly
OTHER AGENDA ITEMS:
16. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING FEDERAL AMERICAN RECOVERY AND
REINVESTMENT ACT (ARRA) FUNDS FOR SAN RAFAEL (CM) — FILE 279
Deputy City Manager Nancy Mackle reported that a staff team had been assembled to evaluate all sources of
revenue in the Federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), which were listed in the back of
the staff report. As not all applied to the City, she would focus on those the City could apply for i.e., those
items the City could manage, build and directly implement.
Public Safetv Grant — The City was allocated $109,195 subject to submission of an application to complete
the process. Ms. Mackle reported that Captain Franzini was in attendance because attached to the staff
report was an explanation of the potential use of funds, which he could explain. The grant required
requesting public comment on the use of the funds, and would take place this evening. She noted the focus
was the Citizens Police Academy, which was discontinued due to financial constraints. This was a great way
to provide information to the citizens concerning a broad range of topics, including gangs, drug abuse, etc.,
and she anticipated that the Academy would be conducted in Spanish also. Captain Franzini was available
to answer questions.
Public Safetv Competitive Grant — To cover salary and benefits for civilian personnel in the Police
Department. Staff would present a proposal on this grant on April 20, 2009.
Clean Cities Grant to help pav for hvbrid vehicles - Fleet Advisory Board to evaluate the schedule for
replacement and what replacement would mean with a City match paying half the additional cost for a hybrid.
Enerav Efficiencv and Conservation Block Grants - $575,400 allocated with broad uses. With an application
deadline of June 25, 2009, staff would move fast to get something ready. Discussions would take place with
the Public Works Department to ascertain what could be done for energy efficiencies in buildings and
possibly, traffic signals.
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) — For employees laid off, 65% of the COBRA
premiums could be paid for nine months. Human Resources following up.
Fire Station Funds — Funding for approximately two or three stations in the entire State of California. While
staff would evaluate, it would be a balancing act between how much work it would entail and how competitive
the City could be. Ms. Mackle noted that it could be for a station remodel, station #4, or station #7, with Marin
County, should the project be proceeded with.
Surface Transportation Proqram — In this case, again, the project would need to be "shovel -ready." Staff
would work with the Transportation Authority of Marin to ascertain whether funding could be obtained for the
1-580/101 Connector Project.
Ms. Mackle noted that these funding sources were one-time only. They would not help with the deficit;
however, they were ways to generate jobs locally. Staff would consider how much time could be spent on
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04-06/2009 Page 7
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04/06/2009 Page 8
applying for, monitoring and following up on the grants, versus the amounts of moneys that could be
obtained. They had met with the other cities, towns and the County of Marin to ascertain whether there were
things that could be done cooperatively. Staff would return to the City Council with updates as issues arose.
Ms. Mackle stated that staff recommended acceptance of the report and that the City Council take public
comment on Captain Franzini's grant.
Mayor Boro requested clarification on his understanding that approximately $980,000 had been awarded for
street improvements.
Ms. Mackle referred to the last page of Attachment "A" which identified $989,000 for Street Resurfacing STP
2009 Funds. She commented that the chart would be updated and maintained on the Internet so that people
could see the moneys being received by San Rafael.
With regard to the 1-580/Highway 101 connector, Mayor Boro stated it was his understanding that Caltrans
would go forward with temporary re -striping to eliminate part of the bottleneck. He noted there was approval
for $15 million - $20 million to redo that work as well as road improvements on Bellam Boulevard itself, and
inquired as to what the funds mentioned had to do with the anticipated $15 million - $20 million.
Mr. Nordhoff explained that a couple of months ago the Stimulus Bill had not been passed, the State was
broke and no funding was currently earmarked through the State, CTC, MTC or anyone else that would put
dollars into the 1-580/Highway 101 connector project, estimated at approximately $20 million. At the time, the
Transportation Authority of Marin (TAM) was working to look at alternative funding which would include the
stimulus dollars. With the Stimulus Bill in place, together with the sale of approximately $6.5 billion in bonds,
some of these funds would be directed not only to Caltrans projects that were underway and falling short of
cash, but funds would be available to fund some items ready to go. Mr. Nordhoff reported that the design for
this project was ready and he understood from Dianne Steinhauser, Transportation Authority of Marin, that
MTC would this month be deciding to allocate the necessary construction money for 1-580/Highway 101. The
project would go out to bid this spring and be awarded, and the work would commence in the summer. He
suspected that a placeholder would be left so that should something come in short relative to the scope of
work, this tool would be used to plug that gap; however, this would not be known until the bid came forward.
San Rafael would be working with TAM to do this on the City's behalf as they were coordinating with
Caltrans.
Referring to page 2 of Attachment A — New Starts for Rail, Bus, etc. — Councilmember Heller inquired
whether any of these funds could be obtained to help fund bus stops and bus shelters that needed to be
brought up to ADA requirements.
Ms. Mackle stated staff would evaluate this and consult with the other agencies.
With regard to Broadband Technoloav Opportunities Program — Councilmember Heller inquired whether it
would be possible to tie any of this into Emergency Services, etc.
Mr. Nordhoff stated that the meeting mentioned by Ms. Mackle was an all city and town meeting on
Wednesday last. He invited Barbara Thornton, Marin Telecommunications Agency (MTA), to attend as she
was spearheading evaluating many of the Broadband grants, and he was pleased to report that the "Council
Chamber Upgrade" would be included in the pile, as it was "shovel ready." Mr. Nordhoff indicated that
information would be provided to Ms. Thornton in the next couple of weeks. Investment in the technology of
San Rafael's, and other cities' and towns' Council Chambers, had multiple uses, including access, evaluating
grant requirements, together with emergency operations components. MTA would be the coordinating
agency and they felt it would be better to compete on a broader base, rather than on a city by city or town by
town basis.
Speaking of the Council Chambers Media Upgrade, Councilmember Brockbank commented that he had a
brief thought earlier to -day that perhaps the Council's pay cut could be traded off for funding of this project;
however, having done his calculations he realized it would not go very far.
Based on an experience he had recently in the Santa Rosa Council Chambers, Mayor Boro noted that the
monitors in front of each Councilmember's position were so high it was not possible to see the public;
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04-06/2009 Page 8
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04/06/2009 Page 9
therefore, he suggested recessed screens be considered.
Noting Ms. Mackle indicated the City had no "Brown Field" sites that qualified, Mayor Boro inquired about the
PG&E site that had yet to be completely cleaned.
Responding, Ms. Mackle stated that the definition of "Brown Field" was not that it was dirty soil, rather it had
no economic value and could not be developed.
Mr. Nordhoff stated that to comply with the grant requirements he wished to ensure that, should anyone wish
to comment with respect to Captain Franzini's grant application, they should do so, including the City Council.
Councilmember Miller moved and Councilmember Brockbank seconded, to accept the report.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Brockbank, Heller, Miller & Mayor Boro
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Connolly
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
17. None
COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS: (Including AB 1234 Reports on Meetings and Conferences Attended at City Expense)
18. Planning Academv: - File 9-3-85 x 9-1
Councilmember Heller reported having successfully completed the 2009 San Rafael Planning Academy and
shared her Certificate of Completion. She stated the six-week program was excellent.
Buckelew: - File 13-16 x 9-1
Councilmember Heller reported that Steven Ramsland, Buckelew Programs, informed her that they had opened a
Cafe in their Wellness Center and he invited all to attend for coffee, meetings, etc.
Councilmember Brockbank reported having attended the opening of the cafe at the Health and Wellness Campus,
run by Buckelew House, and he inquired whether it was appropriate to present, for example, a proclamation, in
such situations. Mayor Boro stated it depended on the format.
Marin Enerqv Authoritv: - File 271 x 9-1
Councilmember Heller reported having attended the Marin Energy Authority meeting on behalf of Councilmember
Connolly last week. They were beginning to look very seriously at the Request for Bid, which would probably be
passed at the next meeting. She noted a monthly memo on what the committee was doing would be circulated.
College of Marin Event: - File 9-1
On behalf of Jim Geraghty, Councilmember Brockbank announced that Amy Goodman, Democracy Now, would be
speaking at College of Marin on Sunday, April 12, 2009 at 6:00 p.m. This event is co-sponsored by the Community
Media Center of Marin, Marin Telecommunications Agency.
Homelessness: - File 13-16 x 9-1
Mayor Boro reported having attended a meeting at the County of Marin recently where the head of the Federal
Government's Campaign to Eliminate Homelessness was in attendance to present a check to Marin County and to
discuss an increase in the basic aid they receive for the homeless. He noted that an approximate $550,000 one-
time grant was available to assist primarily in keeping people from becoming homeless. He noted the comment that
it was hoped the cities, towns and County would get serious about working on a program to end homelessness.
Mayor Boro believed the focus needed to be changed somewhat to provide the needed help upfront.
There being no further business, Mayor Boro adjourned the City Council meeting at 8:51 p.m
ESTHER C. BEIRNE, City Clerk
APPROVED THIS DAY OF 2009
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
SRCC Minutes (Regular) 04-06/2009 Page 9