HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC Resolution 15337 (Response to the Grand Jury Report on Sea Level Rise)RESOLUTION NO. 15337
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE
RESPONSE TO THE MARIN COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY REPORT
ENTITLED “SEA LEVEL RISE: THE WATER IS UPON US. WE CANNOT
RUN - WE CANNOT HIDE”
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Rafael has received and reviewed
the Marin County Grand Jury Report, dated May 31, 2024, entitled “Sea Level Rise: The
Water Is Upon Us. We Cannot Run - We Cannot Hide;” and
WHEREAS, the City of San Rafael was invited to respond
WHEREAS, pursuant to Penal Code section 933(c), a public agency which receives
a final grand jury report addressing aspects of the public agency’s operations must, within
ninety (90) days, provide a written response to the presiding judge of the Superior Court,
with a copy to the foreperson of the grand jury, responding to the report’s findings and
recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body; and
WHEREAS, Penal Code section 933(c) requires that the “governing body” of the
public agency provide said response and, in order to lawfully comply, the governing body
must consider and adopt the response at a noticed public meeting pursuant to the Brown
Act; and
WHEREAS, Penal Code section 933.05 specifies the required contents of a city’s
response to findings and recommendations of a civil grand jury; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San
Rafael hereby:
1. Approves and authorizes the Mayor to execute the City’s response to the Marin
County Grand Jury’s dated May 31, 2024, entitled “Sea Level Rise: The Water Is
Upon Us. We Cannot Run - We Cannot Hide;” a copy of which response is attached
hereto as Attachment 1 and incorporated herein by reference.
2. Directs the City Clerk to forward the City’s response forthwith to the presiding judge
of the Marin County Superior Court, with copy to the foreperson of the Marin County
Grand Jury.
I, Lindsay Lara, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the San
Rafael City Council held on the 19th day of August 2024, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Bushey, Kertz, Llorens Gulati & Mayor Kate
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Hill
LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk
ATTACHMENT 1
RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY REPORT FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
REPORT TITLE: "Sea Level Rise: The Water is Upon Us We Cannot Run - We Cannot
Hide"
REPORT DATE: May 31, 2024
RESPONSE BY: San Rafael City Council
GRAND JURY FINDINGS
■ The City agrees with the finding(s) numbered: F3, F4, F5
■ The City disagrees partially with the finding(s) numbered: F1, F2, F6
GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS
■ Recommendations numbered R1, R2, and R3 do not require a response by the City of San
Rafael because they are recommendations for the Board of Supervisors, not the City of San
Rafael.
Date: bkv Signed:
ayor Kate Colin
yP� RAg9F!
A
City of San Rafael Response to Grand Jury Report Findings and Recommendations
"Sea Level Rise: The Water is Upon Us We Cannot Run - We Cannot Hide"
May 31, 2024
RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY FINDINGS
F1. A comprehensive countywide agency is necessary to effectively address the impacts
of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: Partially disagree.
We agree that a comprehensive approach to adaptation is beneficial; however, there are
inherent differences between jurisdictions and physical areas of the county. These differences
should be adequately acknowledged and honored in any comprehensive approach to
adaptation. At this moment, staff believes it is premature to recommend a specific governance
or funding model to advance adaptation efforts and it is more appropriate to review the findings
and recommendations that will arise from the County -led research project that is focused on
answering these questions. The City of San Rafael is actively participating in that project and
looks forward to contributing to the collaborative effort.
F2. To be effective, a countywide agency created to address sea level rise in Marin
County should include the County of Marin, all cities and towns, and appropriate special
districts in Marin County as funding participants.
Response: Partially disagree
At this time there is an on -going study investigating the most appropriate governance and
funding mechanisms to effectively address the challenges of sea level rise. We look forward to
participating in that study and reviewing the findings and recommendations. Staff concludes that
it would be premature to draw conclusions on the best governance model or funding structure
before that study is concluded.
F3. The complete failure to create and implement effective countywide sea level rise
adaptation projects in Marin County will result in significant damages and losses to
commercial and residential properties as well as infrastructure, both public and private.
Response: Agree
A regional study led by the Bay Conservancy and Development Commission found that San
Rafael is the community most at risk of significant impacts due to sea level rise expected in the
short term. The potential damages are significant to vulnerable residents, regional infrastructure
and commercial interests. San Rafael is closely connected to neighboring communities
economically, socially, and through complex, interconnected infrastructure and transportation
networks. Cross -jurisdictional coordination will be essential in developing adequate solutions to
sea level rise.
City of San Rafael Response to Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations Page 2 of 4
yP� RAFq�`
i
City of San Rafael Response to Grand Jury Report Findings and Recommendations
"Sea Level Rise: The Water is Upon Us We Cannot Run - We Cannot Hide"
May 31, 2024
F4. The 2034 deadline imposed by Sections 30985-30985.8 of the California Public
Resources Code for each California county to submit its official sea level rise mitigation
plan is "too little too late" for Marin County, and delaying action until then will expose
coastal and Bay areas to unnecessary flooding risks, financial and other losses.
Response: Agree
While planning work is underway and some adaptation projects have moved forward, adaptation
efforts need to be scaled up and funding must be allocated from both the state and federal
government to implement the measures that the studies identify. Given the long lead time
needed to design, permit, fund, and construct large infrastructure projects, it is essential that
adaptation be advanced as expeditiously as possible. This is particularly true for East San
Rafael, which is already lower than today's highest tides and is experiencing impacts from sea
level rise.
F5. Under -represented populations reside in areas that are severely vulnerable to sea
level rise because they are in low-lying ground.
Response: Agree
In San Rafael, thousands of residents live on land that is already lower than today's high tides
and will be increasingly vulnerable as sea level continues to rise and the ground continues to
subside. Equity considerations must be at the forefront of all adaptation investments and under-
represented communities in vulnerable areas, such as East San Rafael, should be prioritized
given the life -safety and displacement risks that exist there.
F6. Sea level rise plans to be developed by a countywide entity should include adaptation
strategies that directly apply to under -represented communities in low-lying areas with
great exposure to sea level rise, such as the Canal District, areas of Novato, and Marin
City, among others.
Response: Partially disagree
We strongly agree that adaptation investments should be prioritized in under -represented
communities most exposed to sea level rise, including the Canal neighborhood. It is not yet
clear whether a countywide entity would be the best way to advance this goal advancing
adaptation strategies in under -represented communities.
City of San Rafael Response to Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations Page 3 of 4
City of San Rafael Response to Grand Jury Report Findings and Recommendations
"Sea Level Rise: The Water is Upon Us We Cannot Run - We Cannot Hide"
May 31, 2024
RECOMMENDATIONS
By March 20, 2025, the following actions should be implemented by:
R1. The Board of Supervisors, in collaboration with Marin County cities, towns, Bel Marin
Keys Community Services District and Marin Water should create a comprehensive
countywide agency with authority to plan and implement adaptation efforts addressing
the impacts of sea level rise in Marin County.
Response: The City of San Rafael does not have the authority to direct the Board of
Supervisors to implement this recommendation. No further response by the City is required.
R2. The Board of Supervisors should actively enlist the participation and support of state
and federal legislators toward the creation and funding of this comprehensive
countywide agency.
Response: The City of San Rafael does not have the authority to direct the Board of
Supervisors to implement this recommendation. No further response by the City is required.
R3. The Board of Supervisors should require the newly created countywide entity to
create plans that recognize and address sea level rise exposure and the specific risks to
the populations in the Canal District, Marin City, specific areas in Novato, and all low-
lying geographic regions where lower income populations reside. The plan should
identify and address the risks impacting those populations, which include:
(a) risks of becoming stranded due to inaccessible roads;
(b) lack of transportation if evacuations are called;
(c) mold that may grow inside their homes;
(d) exposure to infectious diseases due to contaminated standing water;
(e) need to relocate temporarily or permanently as a result of floods; and
(f) other community -specific risks identified in regional assessments.
Response: The City of San Rafael does not have the authority to direct the Board of
Supervisors to implement this recommendation. No further response by the City is required.
City of San Rafael Response to Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations Page 4 of 4