HomeMy WebLinkAboutPolice Advisory & Accountability Committee 2025-02-19 Agenda PacketPOLICE ADVISORY AND ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 19, 2025, AT 6:00 PM In-Person: San Rafael City Council Chambers 1400 Fifth Ave, San Rafael, California Virtual: Watch Online: https://tinyurl.com/PAAC2025 Listen by Phone: (669) 444-9171 Meeting ID: 861 8590 4369 AGENDA How to participate in the meeting: •You are welcome to provide comments in person at the meeting. Each speaker will have 2 minutes to provide public comment. •Submit your comments by email to PAAC@cityofsanrafael.org by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. CALL TO ORDER –6:00PM MINUTES 1.Approve regular meeting minutes from the January 11, 2025, special meeting and regular meeting minutes from the January 15, 2025, meeting. OPEN TIME FOR PUBLIC EXPRESSION The public is welcome to address the Police Advisory and Accountability Committee at this time on matters not on the agenda that are within its jurisdiction. Comments may be no longer than 2 minutes and should be respectful to the community. OTHER AGENDA ITEMS If necessary to ensure the completion of the following items, the Chairperson may establish time limits for the presentations by individual speakers. 2.Other Agenda Items: a.U.S. Customs & Immigration and the San Rafael Police Department Recommendation: Receive the informational report. STAFF LIAISON REPORT 3.Other brief program updates or reports on any meetings, conferences, and/or seminars attended by staff. COMMITTEE REPORTS 4.Other brief reports on any meetings, conferences, and/or seminars attended by the Committee members. ADJOURNMENT Any records relating to an agenda item, received by a majority or more of the Board less than 72 hours before the meeting, sh all be available for inspection online and in the city hall large conference room, third floor, 1400 5th Avenue, San Rafael, California placed with other agenda-related materials on the table in front of the location prior to the meeting. Sign Language interpreters may be requested by calling (415) 485-3066 (voice), emailing city.clerk@cityofsanrafael.org or using the California Telecommunications Relay Service by dialing “711”, at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Copies of documents are available in accessible formats upon request POLICE ADVISORY AND ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE (PAAC) SATURDAY JANUARY 11, 2025, AT 9:00 AM In-Person: San Rafael City Council Chambers 1400 Fifth Ave, San Rafael, California Virtual: Watch Online: https://tinyurl.com/PAAC2025SpecialMeeting Listen by Phone: (669) 444-9171 Meeting ID: 898-5264-7245# MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Tokolahi called the meeting to order at 9:23 AM and requested a roll call. ROLL CALL Present: Member Daniel Alm Member Marilyn Alvarez Member Paula Kamena Member Mydung Nguyen Member Darlin Ruiz Member Fatai Tokolahi Alternate Member Salamah Locks Alternate Member Karla Valdez Absent: Member Darioush Davidi Staff Present: Angela Robinson Piñon, Assistant City Manager David Spiller, Police Chief Scott Eberle, Lieutenant, San Rafael Police Department Teresa Olson, Sr. Mgmt. Analyst, San Rafael Police Department Lieutenant Scott Eberle informed the community that the in-person meeting would also be recorded and streamed live to YouTube and through Zoom. He noted the two -minute timer for public comment and closed captioning on Zoom. OPEN TIME FOR PUBLIC EXPRESSION Nikki Silverstein commented on transparency and writing a recent news article. George Bigelow commented on public items of concern involving law enforcement and applauded the Committee on their work. Stephen Bingham spoke about procedural issues with the Committee and allowing three minutes per speaker during the public comment portion of the meeting s and allowing online comments. Jason commented on binding arbitration . Jerry Spolter commented on the arbitration decision and transparency. Heidi thanked the Committee for their service and completing their first year. She spoke about the goals of the Committee. Lisa Doring commented on community trust and communication. Emilio Pineda commented on the arbitration decision . Mike commented on unions, policing and binding arbitration . 1. OTHER AGENDA ITEMS a. Development of the 2025 Workplan Lieutenant Scott Eberle presented the staff report. The Committee asked questions. Chair Tokolahi opened the item for public comment. Speakers: George Bigelow, Xania, Stephen Bingham, Jason, Heidi, Nikki Silverstein, Lisa Doring Public Comment reflected interest in the following topics: Youth & Policing (participation from the youth community) Police Culture (including outside perspectives) Pretext Stops Collective Bargaining Homelessness Field Training Program Transparency Bylaws The Committee members shared their topics of interest which included the following: Topic Number of PAAC Members Interested in Topic Youth and Policing 8 Police Culture 7 Prostitution/Human-Trafficking 6 Transparency 6 ICE/Immigration 6 Homelessness 5 Police Wellness 4 RIPA 4 Traffic Safety 3 Collective bargaining 2 Police Academy 2 Pretext Stops 2 Theft and Burglary 2 Technology/Drones 1 Language Interpretation 1 Press Release Timelines 1 Use of Force 1 Bylaws 1 Complaint Data 1 Tie Breaking 2nd Round Vote RIPA 5 Police Wellness 3 The top seven topics of interest to the PAAC will be presented in 2025. ADJOURNMENT Chair Tokolahi adjourned the meeting at 11:31 a.m. ___________________________ SCOTT EBERLE, Staff Liaison APPROVED THIS _____DAY OF_______, 2024 POLICE ADVISORY AND ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE (PAAC) WEDNESDAY JANUARY 15, 2025, AT 6:00 PM In-Person: San Rafael City Council Chambers 1400 Fifth Ave, San Rafael, California Virtual: Watch Online: https://tinyurl.com/PAAC2025 Listen by Phone: (669) 444-9171 Meeting ID: 898-5264-7245# MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Chair Tokolahi called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM and requested a roll call. ROLL CALL Present: Member Daniel Alm Member Marilyn Alvarez Member Paula Kamena Member Mydung Nguyen Member Darlin Ruiz Vice Chair Davidi Chair Fatai Tokolahi Alternate Member Salamah Locks (arrived at 6:05 PM) Alternate Member Karla Valdez Absent: NONE Staff Present: Angela Robinson Piñon, Assistant City Manager David Spiller, Police Chief Scott Eberle, Lieutenant, San Rafael Police Department Teresa Olson, Sr. Mgmt. Analyst, San Rafael Police Department Joanna Kwok, Assistant Public Works Director, City of San Rafael Eugelyn Lopez, Junior Engineer, City of San Rafael Jimmy Jessup, Parametrix Lieutenant Scott Eberle informed the community that the in-person meeting would also be recorded and streamed live to YouTube and through Zoom. He noted the two -minute timer for public comment and closed captioning on Zoom. 1.MINUTES Chair Tokolahi invited public comment, however, there was none. Member Alm moved to approve the November 20, 2024, and December 4, 2024 , minutes, Member Kamena seconded the motion. AYES: NOES: MEMBERS: Alm, Alvarez, Davidi Kamena, Nguyen, Ruiz, Tokolahi MEMBERS: None ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:None MEMBERS: None The motion carried 7-0-0–0. OPEN TIME FOR PUBLIC EXPRESSION Jason spoke about the Brandon Nail arbitration decision quoting an article from the Pacific Sun. Heidi commented on the PAAC workplan, transparency, policy and bylaws. 2.OTHER AGENDA ITEMS a.Assembly Bill No. 43 (AB 43) Presentation- Jimmy Jessup, Parametrix Mr. Jessup presented the item. The Committee asked questions. Chair Tokolahi opened the item for public comment. Speakers: Justin, Jason, Heidi b.2024 PAAC Annual Report Senior Management Analyst Olson presented the item. The Committee asked questions. Chair Tokolahi opened the item for public comment. Speakers: Heidi, Jason Member Kamena moved to accept the 2024 PAAC Annual Report with a change in verbiage on page 10 of the Annual Report from the term recommendation to topic under the Youth and Policing item, along with amending the introductory language under Committee Recommendations section to reflect the recommendations were diverse amongst Committee members, Member Ruiz seconded the motion. AYES: MEMBERS: Alm, Alvarez, Davidi, Kamena, Nguyen, Ruiz, Tokolahi NOES: MEMBERS: None ABSENT: MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: None The motion carried 7-0-0–0. STAFF LIAISON REPORT Lieutenant Eberle reported the following complaint data for 2024: o 33 Complaints o 23 Exonerated o 6 Unfounded o 2 Sustained o 2 Pending o 1 Complaint was for bias o 1 Complaint was for use of force Neither the complaint regarding bias nor the use of force was sustained, and no additional information is subject to public disclosure under §832.7 of the Penal Code. Assistant City Manager Robinson -Pinon shared the recruitment information for the Marin County Sheriff’s Civilian Oversight Committee. The recruitment is open through February 16, 2025. COMMITTEE REPORTS Member Davidi expressed his thanks to all first responders in the wake of the recent fires in Los Angeles. Member Kamena thanked the officers involved in the recent wrong -way freeway pursuit and noted the coordination of multiple agencies. Member Alm reported he had coffee with Heidi and discussed the recent PAAC Annual Report. Member Tokolahi thanked the communtiy for their involvement with the PAAC , attending meetings, making comments and participation. ADJOURNMENT Chair Tokolahi adjourned the meeting at 7:51 PM ___________________________ SCOTT EBERLE, Staff Liaison APPROVED THIS _____DAY OF_______, 2024 Page 1 of 3 POLICE ADVISORY AND ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT February 19, 2025 Item 2a TITLE: INFORMATION ON U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND THE SAN RAFAEL POLICE DEPARTMENT (SRPD) RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. BACKGROUND: The San Rafael Police Department (SRPD or Department) is committed to ensuring the safety and security of all individuals within our community, regardless of their immigration status. In accordance with the California Values Act (SB 54) and SRPD Policy 413, our Department does not engage in federal immigration enforcement. SB54 was enacted to limit the involvement of local and state law enforcement agencies in immigration matters, thereby reinforcing community trust, safeguarding public safety, and ensuring the ef fective functioning of law enforcement agencies. SRPD Policy 413 aligns with this state mandate by stipulating that personnel shall not utilize Department resources for immigration enforcement. This policy is reflective of our broader commitment to prioritizing community safety, including responding to service calls, investigating criminal activities, and working collaboratively with residents to f oster a safer environment for all in San Rafael. SRPD recognizes that maintaining positive and cooperative relationships with our diverse community, particularly with immigrant populations, is critical to the success of our policing efforts. SRPD places a high value on building and sustaining trust through transparency, pro active engagement, and accessibility. It is our firm belief that every member of the community, regardless of immigration status, should feel confident in reaching out to law enforcement for assistance without fear of immigration -related consequences. Through these efforts, SRPD continues to prioritize the safety, well -being, and trust of all residents, reinforcing our commitment to providing professional, responsive, and inclusive law enforcement services to the entire San Rafael community. DISCUSSION: SRPD complies with SB 54 and SRPD Policy 413 by ensuring that our resources are not used for immigration enforcement. As a matter of policy and practice, the SRPD does not engage in immigration enforcement activities, including collaborating with federal immigration officials on investigations, interrogations, detentions, or arrests related to immigration status, unless r equired to do so by any future federal legal mandates. San Rafael remains committed to being a welcoming and inclusive city. The following guidelines are in place to reinforce our commitment: • Non-Involvement in Immigration Enforcement – Officers do not stop, question, arrest, or detain individuals solely based on suspected immigration status. • Data Protection – SRPD does not share personal information with federal immigration Page 2 of 3 authorities unless required by state or federal law. • Detainer Requests – The Department does not honor immigration detainer requests without a judicial warrant or a qualifying criminal offense as outlined in SB 54. • Community Reassurance – Officers are trained to communicate SRPD’s position on immigration enforcement, ensuring that community members feel safe engaging with law enforcement. • Commitment to a Safe and Inclusive Community SRPD requires all officers to uphold a professional commitment to enforcing the law consistently and without bias. This commitment is essential in fostering public trust and improving the Department’s effectiveness in serving and protecting the entire community while ensuring the dignity and rights of all individuals are respected, regardless of national origin or immigration status. A fundamental responsibility of the SRPD is to build trust and establish meaningful connections with all members of our community. Beyond ensuring policy compliance, we are dedicated to strengthening our relationship with the immigrant community. We recogn ize that community safety is a shared responsibility, and it is vital that individuals feel safe and supported when reporting crimes, seeking assistance, or participating in civic life —without fear or hesitation. Our goal is to create an environment where every resident feels valued, respected, and confident in turning to law enforcement for help, knowing that their safety and well -being are our highest priorities. To that end, we actively engage with residents through outreach efforts, educational programs, and cultural events that strengthen relationships between law enforcement and San Rafael’s diverse communities. COMMUNITY OUTREACH: SRPD considers community engagement a core component of building trust, particularly with immigrant communities. We are committed to establishing strong relationships through targeted outreach efforts. Recent initiatives have included: 1. Holding Community Meetings in Spanish: To ensure accessibility, SRPD organizes safety forums conducted entirely in Spanish. These sessions cover topics such as crime prevention, domestic violence resources, and how to report incidents without fear of immigration consequences. 2. Participation in Cultural and Religious Events: SRPD actively participates in community events such as Día de los Muertos, local church gatherings, and other cultural celebrations to demonstrate our commitment to inclusivity and to interact with residents in a non -enforcement capacity. 3. Spanish-Speaking Community Academy: SRPD offers a Spanish-Speaking Community Academy, providing residents with an in -depth look at police operations, crime prevention, and community safety topics in their preferred language. This program strengthens relationships, enhances transparency, and empowers residents to engage with law enforcement confidently . 4. Youth Engagement & Cadet Program: We work closely with local schools to recruit students for our Cadet and Explorer programs, ensuring that young people from diverse backgrounds, including Hispanic /Latino students, have positive early interactions with law enforcement. We actively recruit people from our local Page 3 of 3 community to fill all positions within the police department. 5. Collaboration with Community Organizations: SRPD partners with advocacy groups, non-profits, and legal aid organizations to provide resources, education, and reassurance to immigrant families. These partnerships help bridge gaps in understanding and ensure that residents know their rights and protections under California law. These outreach efforts reinforce SRPD’s commitment to ensuring that all residents, regardless of immigration status, feel safe, valued, and supported in our community. SRPD remains steadfast in our commitment to serving and supporting the entire San Rafael community. This includes every individual, regardless of their nationality or immigration status. The Department’s mission is rooted in ensuring public safety and delivering equitable service to everyone . We provide protection and assistance to everyone w e serve. FISCAL IMPACT: None Submitted by: Roy Leon Police Captain Attachments: 1. SRPD Policy 413 2. California Values Act (SB 54) 3. SB54 Presentation Policy 413 San Rafael Police Department San Rafael PD Policy Manual Immigration Violations 413.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines to members of the San Rafael Police Department relating to immigration and interacting with federal immigration officials. 413.1.1 DEFINITIONS The following definitions apply to this policy (Government Code § 7284.4): Criminal immigration violation - Any federal criminal immigration violation that penalizes a person’s presence in, entry, or reentry to, or employment in, the United States. This does not include any offense where a judicial warrant already has been issued. Immigration authority - Any federal, state, or local officer, employee, or other person performing immigration enforcement functions. Immigration enforcement - Any and all efforts to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of any federal civil immigration law, including any and all efforts to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of any federal criminal immigration law that penalizes a person's presence in, entry or reentry to, or employment in the United States. Judicial warrant - An arrest warrant for a violation of federal criminal immigration law and issued by a federal judge or a federal magistrate judge. 413.2 POLICY It is the policy of the San Rafael Police Department that all members make personal and professional commitments to equal enforcement of the law and equal service to the public. Confidence in this commitment will increase the effectiveness of this department in protecting and serving the entire community and recognizing the dignity of all persons, regardless of their national origin or immigration status. 413.3 VICTIMS AND WITNESSES To encourage crime reporting and cooperation in the investigation of criminal activity, all individuals, regardless of their immigration status, must feel secure that contacting or being addressed by members of law enforcement will not automatically lead to immigration inquiry and/or deportation. While it may be necessary to determine the identity of a victim or witness, members shall treat all individuals equally and not in any way that would violate the United States or California constitutions. 413.4 U VISA AND T VISA NONIMMIGRANT STATUS Under certain circumstances, federal law allows temporary immigration benefits, known as a U visa, to victims and witnesses of certain qualifying crimes (8 USC § 1101(a)(15)(U)). Similar immigration protection, known as a T visa, is available for certain qualifying victims of human trafficking (8 USC § 1101(a)(15)(T)). Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/12/11, All Rights Reserved. Published with permission by San Rafael Police Department Immigration Violations - 355 San Rafael Police Department San Rafael PD Policy Manual Immigration Violations Any request for assistance in applying for U visa or T visa status should be forwarded in a timely manner to the Investigations Section supervisor assigned to oversee the handling of any related case. The Investigations Section supervisor should: (a)Consult with the assigned investigator to determine the current status of any related case and whether further documentation is warranted. (b)Contact the appropriate prosecutor assigned to the case, if applicable, to ensure the certification or declaration has not already been completed and whether a certification or declaration is warranted. (c)Address the request and complete the certification or declaration, if appropriate, in a timely manner. 1.The instructions for completing certification and declaration forms can be found on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) website. 2.Form I-918 Supplement B certification shall be completed if the victim qualifies under Penal Code § 679.10 (multiple serious offenses). The certification shall be completed and not refused for the specified reasons in Penal Code § 679.10(k) (3). 3.Form I-914 Supplement B declaration shall be completed if the victim qualifies under Penal Code § 236.5 or Penal Code § 679.11 (human trafficking). The declaration shall be completed and not refused for completion for the specified reasons in Penal Code § 679.11(j)(3). 4.Forward the completed Form I-918 Supplement B certification or completed Form I-914 declaration B to the victim, family member, or authorized representative (as defined in Penal Code § 679.10 and Penal Code § 679.11) without requiring the victim to provide government-issued identification (Penal Code § 679.10; Penal Code § 679.11) (d)Ensure that any decision to complete, or not complete, a certification or declaration form is documented in the case file and forwarded to the appropriate prosecutor. Include a copy of any completed form in the case file. 1.If Form I-918 Supplement B is not certified, a written explanation of denial shall be provided to the victim or authorized representative. The written denial shall include specific details of any reasonable requests for cooperation and a detailed description of how the victim refused to cooperate (Penal Code § 679.10). (e)Inform the victim liaison of any requests and their status. 413.4.1 TIME FRAMES FOR COMPLETION Officers and their supervisors who are assigned to investigate a case of human trafficking as defined by Penal Code § 236.1 shall complete the above process and the documents needed for indicating the individual is a victim for the T visa application within 15 business days of the first encounter with the victim, regardless of whether it is requested by the victim (Penal Code § 236.5). Officers and their supervisors shall complete the above process and the documents needed certifying victim cooperation for a U visa or T visa application pursuant to Penal Code § 679.10 Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/12/11, All Rights Reserved. Published with permission by San Rafael Police Department Immigration Violations - 356 San Rafael Police Department San Rafael PD Policy Manual Immigration Violations and Penal Code § 679.11 within 30 days of a request from the victim, victim's family, or authorized representative related to one of their assigned cases. If the victim is in removal proceedings, the certification shall be processed within seven days of the first business day following the day the request was received. 413.4.2 POLICE REPORTS Upon request, an officer or supervisor should provide a victim or authorized representative with a copy of the report filed by the victim within seven days of the request (Penal Code § 679.10). 413.5 DETENTIONS, INVESTIGATIONS, AND ARRESTS An officer shall not investigate, interrogate, detain, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes, including a civil violation of federal immigration laws or a related civil warrant (Government Code § 7284.6). An officer shall not use immigration authorities as interpreters for law enforcement matters relating to individuals in agency or department custody(Government Code § 7284.6). 413.6 PROTECTION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION The Department shall not collect any information about an individual's immigration status. No officer shall provide personal information about an individual to any immigration authority, including, but not limited to, the individual's name, physical description, home address, work address, and telephone number unless that information is available to the public (Government Code § 7284.6(a)(1)(D); Civil Code § 1798.3). 413.7 FEDERAL REQUESTS FOR ASSISTANCE Requests by federal immigration officials for assistance from this department should be directed to the Operations Lieutenant through the on-duty supervisor. departmentThe Operations Lieutenant is responsible for determining whether the requested assistance would be permitted under the California Values Act (Government Code § 7284.2 et seq.).. 413.8 POLICY VIOLATIONS If an officer suspects that a violation of this policy has occurred, the officer shall promptly report the violation to a supervisor detailing the personnel who are suspected to have been involved in the suspected violation, the date of the suspected violation, and a detailed description of the suspected violation. Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2024/12/11, All Rights Reserved. Published with permission by San Rafael Police Department Immigration Violations - 357 Senate Bill No. 54 CHAPTER 495 An act to amend Sections 7282 and 7282.5 of, and to add Chapter 17.25 (commencing with Section 7284) to Division 7 of Title 1 of, the Government Code, and to repeal Section 11369 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to law enforcement. [Approved by Governor October 5, 2017. Filed with Secretary of State October 5, 2017.] legislative counsel’s digest SB 54, De León. Law enforcement: sharing data. Existing law provides that when there is reason to believe that a person arrested for a violation of specified controlled substance provisions may not be a citizen of the United States, the arresting agency shall notify the appropriate agency of the United States having charge of deportation matters. This bill would repeal those provisions. Existing law provides that whenever an individual who is a victim of or witness to a hate crime, or who otherwise can give evidence in a hate crime investigation, is not charged with or convicted of committing any crime under state law, a peace officer may not detain the individual exclusively for any actual or suspected immigration violation or report or turn the individual over to federal immigration authorities. This bill would, among other things and subject to exceptions, prohibit state and local law enforcement agencies, including school police and security departments, from using money or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes, as specified, and would, subject to exceptions, proscribe other activities or conduct in connection with immigration enforcement by law enforcement agencies. The bill would apply those provisions to the circumstances in which a law enforcement official has discretion to cooperate with immigration authorities. The bill would require, by October 1, 2018, the Attorney General, in consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, to publish model policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible for use by public schools, public libraries, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, and courthouses, among others. The bill would require, among others, all public schools, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, and courthouses to implement the model policy, or an equivalent policy. The bill would state that, among others, all other organizations and entities that provide services related to physical or mental health and wellness, education, or access to justice, including the University of California, are encouraged to adopt the model policy. The bill would require 90 that a law enforcement agency that chooses to participate in a joint law enforcement task force, as defined, submit a report annually pertaining to task force operations to the Department of Justice, as specified. The bill would require the Attorney General, by March 1, 2019, and annually thereafter, to report on the types and frequency of joint law enforcement task forces, and other information, as specified, and to post those reports on the Attorney General’s Internet Web site. The bill would require law enforcement agencies to report to the department annually regarding transfers of persons to immigration authorities. The bill would require the Attorney General to publish guidance, audit criteria, and training recommendations regarding state and local law enforcement databases, for purposes of limiting the availability of information for immigration enforcement, as specified. The bill would require the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide a specified written consent form in advance of any interview between a person in department custody and the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement regarding civil immigration violations. This bill would state findings and declarations of the Legislature relating to these provisions. By imposing additional duties on public schools and local law enforcement agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Section 7282 of the Government Code is amended to read: 7282. For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings: (a)  “Conviction” shall have the same meaning as subdivision (d) of Section 667 of the Penal Code. (b)  “Eligible for release from custody” means that the individual may be released from custody because one of the following conditions has occurred: (1)  All criminal charges against the individual have been dropped or dismissed. (2)  The individual has been acquitted of all criminal charges filed against him or her. (3)  The individual has served all the time required for his or her sentence. (4)  The individual has posted a bond. (5)  The individual is otherwise eligible for release under state or local law, or local policy. 90 — 2 —Ch. 495 (c)  “Hold request,” “notification request,” and “transfer request” have the same meanings as provided in Section 7283. Hold, notification, and transfer requests include requests issued by the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement or the United States Customs and Border Protection as well as any other immigration authorities. (d)  “Law enforcement official” means any local agency or officer of a local agency authorized to enforce criminal statutes, regulations, or local ordinances or to operate jails or to maintain custody of individuals in jails, and any person or local agency authorized to operate juvenile detention facilities or to maintain custody of individuals in juvenile detention facilities. (e)  “Local agency” means any city, county, city and county, special district, or other political subdivision of the state. (f)  “Serious felony” means any of the offenses listed in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7 of the Penal Code and any offense committed in another state which, if committed in California, would be punishable as a serious felony as defined by subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7 of the Penal Code. (g)  “Violent felony” means any of the offenses listed in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5 of the Penal Code and any offense committed in another state which, if committed in California, would be punishable as a violent felony as defined by subdivision (c) of Section 667.5 of the Penal Code. SEC. 2. Section 7282.5 of the Government Code is amended to read: 7282.5. (a)  A law enforcement official shall have discretion to cooperate with immigration authorities only if doing so would not violate any federal, state, or local law, or local policy, and where permitted by the California Values Act (Chapter 17.25 (commencing with Section 7284)). Additionally, the specific activities described in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of, and in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of, Section 7284.6 shall only occur under the following circumstances: (1)  The individual has been convicted of a serious or violent felony identified in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7 of, or subdivision (c) of Section 667.5 of, the Penal Code. (2)  The individual has been convicted of a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison. (3)  The individual has been convicted within the past five years of a misdemeanor for a crime that is punishable as either a misdemeanor or a felony for, or has been convicted within the last 15 years of a felony for, any of the following offenses: (A)  Assault, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 217.1, 220, 240, 241.1, 241.4, 241.7, 244, 244.5, 245, 245.2, 245.3, 245.5, 4500, and 4501 of the Penal Code. (B)  Battery, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 242, 243.1, 243.3, 243.4, 243.6, 243.7, 243.9, 273.5, 347, 4501.1, and 4501.5 of the Penal Code. (C)  Use of threats, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 71, 76, 139, 140, 422, 601, and 11418.5 of the Penal Code. (D)  Sexual abuse, sexual exploitation, or crimes endangering children, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 266, 266a, 266b, 266c, 266d, 90 Ch. 495— 3 — 266f, 266g, 266h, 266i, 266j, 267, 269, 288, 288.5, 311.1, 311.3, 311.4, 311.10, 311.11, and 647.6 of the Penal Code. (E)  Child abuse or endangerment, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 270, 271, 271a, 273a, 273ab, 273d, 273.4, and 278 of the Penal Code. (F)  Burglary, robbery, theft, fraud, forgery, or embezzlement, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 211, 215, 459, 463, 470, 476, 487, 496, 503, 518, 530.5, 532, and 550 of the Penal Code. (G)  Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, but only for a conviction that is a felony. (H)  Obstruction of justice, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 69, 95, 95.1, 136.1, and 148.10 of the Penal Code. (I)  Bribery, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 67, 67.5, 68, 74, 85, 86, 92, 93, 137, 138, and 165 of the Penal Code. (J)  Escape, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 107, 109, 110, 4530, 4530.5, 4532, 4533, 4534, 4535, and 4536 of the Penal Code. (K)  Unlawful possession or use of a weapon, firearm, explosive device, or weapon of mass destruction, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 171b, 171c, 171d, 246, 246.3, 247, 417, 417.3, 417.6, 417.8, 4574, 11418, 11418.1, 12021.5, 12022, 12022.2, 12022.3, 12022.4, 12022.5, 12022.53, 12022.55, 18745, 18750, and 18755 of, and subdivisions (c) and (d) of Section 26100 of, the Penal Code. (L)  Possession of an unlawful deadly weapon, under the Deadly Weapons Recodification Act of 2010 (Part 6 (commencing with Section 16000) of the Penal Code). (M)  An offense involving the felony possession, sale, distribution, manufacture, or trafficking of controlled substances. (N)  Vandalism with prior convictions, as specified in, but not limited to, Section 594.7 of the Penal Code. (O)  Gang-related offenses, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 186.22, 186.26, and 186.28 of the Penal Code. (P)  An attempt, as defined in Section 664 of, or a conspiracy, as defined in Section 182 of, the Penal Code, to commit an offense specified in this section. (Q)  A crime resulting in death, or involving the personal infliction of great bodily injury, as specified in, but not limited to, subdivision (d) of Section 245.6 of, and Sections 187, 191.5, 192, 192.5, 12022.7, 12022.8, and 12022.9 of, the Penal Code. (R)  Possession or use of a firearm in the commission of an offense. (S)  An offense that would require the individual to register as a sex offender pursuant to Section 290, 290.002, or 290.006 of the Penal Code. (T)  False imprisonment, slavery, and human trafficking, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 181, 210.5, 236, 236.1, and 4503 of the Penal Code. (U)  Criminal profiteering and money laundering, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 186.2, 186.9, and 186.10 of the Penal Code. 90 — 4 —Ch. 495 (V)  Torture and mayhem, as specified in, but not limited to, Section 203 of the Penal Code. (W)  A crime threatening the public safety, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 219, 219.1, 219.2, 247.5, 404, 404.6, 405a, 451, and 11413 of the Penal Code. (X)  Elder and dependent adult abuse, as specified in, but not limited to, Section 368 of the Penal Code. (Y)  A hate crime, as specified in, but not limited to, Section 422.55 of the Penal Code. (Z)  Stalking, as specified in, but not limited to, Section 646.9 of the Penal Code. (AA)  Soliciting the commission of a crime, as specified in, but not limited to, subdivision (c) of Section 286 of, and Sections 653j and 653.23 of, the Penal Code. (AB)  An offense committed while on bail or released on his or her own recognizance, as specified in, but not limited to, Section 12022.1 of the Penal Code. (AC)  Rape, sodomy, oral copulation, or sexual penetration, as specified in, but not limited to, paragraphs (2) and (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 261 of, paragraphs (1) and (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 262 of, Section 264.1 of, subdivisions (c) and (d) of Section 286 of, subdivisions (c) and (d) of Section 288a of, and subdivisions (a) and (j) of Section 289 of, the Penal Code. (AD)  Kidnapping, as specified in, but not limited to, Sections 207, 209, and 209.5 of the Penal Code. (AE)  A violation of subdivision (c) of Section 20001 of the Vehicle Code. (4)  The individual is a current registrant on the California Sex and Arson Registry. (5)  The individual has been convicted of a federal crime that meets the definition of an aggravated felony as set forth in subparagraphs (A) to (P), inclusive, of paragraph (43) of subsection (a) of Section 101 of the federal Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. Sec. 1101), or is identified by the United States Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement as the subject of an outstanding federal felony arrest warrant. (6)  In no case shall cooperation occur pursuant to this section for individuals arrested, detained, or convicted of misdemeanors that were previously felonies, or were previously crimes punishable as either misdemeanors or felonies, prior to passage of the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act of 2014 as it amended the Penal Code. (b)  In cases in which the individual is arrested and taken before a magistrate on a charge involving a serious or violent felony, as identified in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7 or subdivision (c) of Section 667.5 of the Penal Code, respectively, or a felony that is punishable by imprisonment in state prison, and the magistrate makes a finding of probable cause as to that charge pursuant to Section 872 of the Penal Code, a law enforcement official shall additionally have discretion to cooperate with immigration 90 Ch. 495— 5 — officials pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 7284.6. SEC. 3. Chapter 17.25 (commencing with Section 7284) is added to Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code, to read: Chapter 17.25. Cooperation with Immigration Authorities 7284. This chapter shall be known, and may be cited, as the California Values Act. 7284.2. The Legislature finds and declares the following: (a)  Immigrants are valuable and essential members of the California community. Almost one in three Californians is foreign born and one in two children in California has at least one immigrant parent. (b)  A relationship of trust between California’s immigrant community and state and local agencies is central to the public safety of the people of California. (c)  This trust is threatened when state and local agencies are entangled with federal immigration enforcement, with the result that immigrant community members fear approaching police when they are victims of, and witnesses to, crimes, seeking basic health services, or attending school, to the detriment of public safety and the well-being of all Californians. (d)  Entangling state and local agencies with federal immigration enforcement programs diverts already limited resources and blurs the lines of accountability between local, state, and federal governments. (e)  State and local participation in federal immigration enforcement programs also raises constitutional concerns, including the prospect that California residents could be detained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, targeted on the basis of race or ethnicity in violation of the Equal Protection Clause, or denied access to education based on immigration status. See Sanchez Ochoa v. Campbell, et al. (E.D. Wash. 2017) 2017 WL 3476777; Trujillo Santoya v. United States, et al. (W.D. Tex. 2017) 2017 WL 2896021; Moreno v. Napolitano (N.D. Ill. 2016) 213 F. Supp. 3d 999; Morales v. Chadbourne (1st Cir. 2015) 793 F.3d 208; Miranda-Olivares v. Clackamas County (D. Or. 2014) 2014 WL 1414305; Galarza v. Szalczyk (3d Cir. 2014) 745 F.3d 634. (f)  This chapter seeks to ensure effective policing, to protect the safety, well-being, and constitutional rights of the people of California, and to direct the state’s limited resources to matters of greatest concern to state and local governments. (g)  It is the intent of the Legislature that this chapter shall not be construed as providing, expanding, or ratifying any legal authority for any state or local law enforcement agency to participate in immigration enforcement. 7284.4. For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings: (a)  “California law enforcement agency” means a state or local law enforcement agency, including school police or security departments. 90 — 6 —Ch. 495 “California law enforcement agency” does not include the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (b)  “Civil immigration warrant” means any warrant for a violation of federal civil immigration law, and includes civil immigration warrants entered in the National Crime Information Center database. (c)  “Immigration authority” means any federal, state, or local officer, employee, or person performing immigration enforcement functions. (d)  “Health facility” includes health facilities as defined in Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code, clinics as defined in Sections 1200 and 1200.1 of the Health and Safety Code, and substance abuse treatment facilities. (e)  “Hold request,” “notification request,” “transfer request,” and “local law enforcement agency” have the same meaning as provided in Section 7283. Hold, notification, and transfer requests include requests issued by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement or United States Customs and Border Protection as well as any other immigration authorities. (f)  “Immigration enforcement” includes any and all efforts to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of any federal civil immigration law, and also includes any and all efforts to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of any federal criminal immigration law that penalizes a person’s presence in, entry, or reentry to, or employment in, the United States. (g)  “Joint law enforcement task force” means at least one California law enforcement agency collaborating, engaging, or partnering with at least one federal law enforcement agency in investigating federal or state crimes. (h)  “Judicial probable cause determination” means a determination made by a federal judge or federal magistrate judge that probable cause exists that an individual has violated federal criminal immigration law and that authorizes a law enforcement officer to arrest and take into custody the individual. (i)  “Judicial warrant” means a warrant based on probable cause for a violation of federal criminal immigration law and issued by a federal judge or a federal magistrate judge that authorizes a law enforcement officer to arrest and take into custody the person who is the subject of the warrant. (j)  “Public schools” means all public elementary and secondary schools under the jurisdiction of local governing boards or a charter school board, the California State University, and the California Community Colleges. (k)  “School police and security departments” includes police and security departments of the California State University, the California Community Colleges, charter schools, county offices of education, schools, and school districts. 7284.6. (a)  California law enforcement agencies shall not: (1)  Use agency or department moneys or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes, including any of the following: (A)  Inquiring into an individual’s immigration status. (B)  Detaining an individual on the basis of a hold request. 90 Ch. 495— 7 — (C)  Providing information regarding a person’s release date or responding to requests for notification by providing release dates or other information unless that information is available to the public, or is in response to a notification request from immigration authorities in accordance with Section 7282.5. Responses are never required, but are permitted under this subdivision, provided that they do not violate any local law or policy. (D)  Providing personal information, as defined in Section 1798.3 of the Civil Code, about an individual, including, but not limited to, the individual’s home address or work address unless that information is available to the public. (E)  Making or intentionally participating in arrests based on civil immigration warrants. (F)  Assisting immigration authorities in the activities described in Section 1357(a)(3) of Title 8 of the United States Code. (G)  Performing the functions of an immigration officer, whether pursuant to Section 1357(g) of Title 8 of the United States Code or any other law, regulation, or policy, whether formal or informal. (2)  Place peace officers under the supervision of federal agencies or employ peace officers deputized as special federal officers or special federal deputies for purposes of immigration enforcement. All peace officers remain subject to California law governing conduct of peace officers and the policies of the employing agency. (3)  Use immigration authorities as interpreters for law enforcement matters relating to individuals in agency or department custody. (4)  Transfer an individual to immigration authorities unless authorized by a judicial warrant or judicial probable cause determination, or in accordance with Section 7282.5. (5)  Provide office space exclusively dedicated for immigration authorities for use within a city or county law enforcement facility. (6)  Contract with the federal government for use of California law enforcement agency facilities to house individuals as federal detainees, except pursuant to Chapter 17.8 (commencing with Section 7310). (b)  Notwithstanding the limitations in subdivision (a), this section does not prevent any California law enforcement agency from doing any of the following that does not violate any policy of the law enforcement agency or any local law or policy of the jurisdiction in which the agency is operating: (1)  Investigating, enforcing, or detaining upon reasonable suspicion of, or arresting for a violation of, Section 1326(a) of Title 8 of the United States Code that may be subject to the enhancement specified in Section 1326(b)(2) of Title 8 of the United States Code and that is detected during an unrelated law enforcement activity. Transfers to immigration authorities are permitted under this subsection only in accordance with paragraph (4) of subdivision (a). (2)  Responding to a request from immigration authorities for information about a specific person’s criminal history, including previous criminal arrests, convictions, or similar criminal history information accessed through 90 — 8 —Ch. 495 the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS), where otherwise permitted by state law. (3)  Conducting enforcement or investigative duties associated with a joint law enforcement task force, including the sharing of confidential information with other law enforcement agencies for purposes of task force investigations, so long as the following conditions are met: (A)  The primary purpose of the joint law enforcement task force is not immigration enforcement, as defined in subdivision (f) of Section 7284.4. (B)  The enforcement or investigative duties are primarily related to a violation of state or federal law unrelated to immigration enforcement. (C)  Participation in the task force by a California law enforcement agency does not violate any local law or policy to which it is otherwise subject. (4)  Making inquiries into information necessary to certify an individual who has been identified as a potential crime or trafficking victim for a T or U Visa pursuant to Section 1101(a)(15)(T) or 1101(a)(15)(U) of Title 8 of the United States Code or to comply with Section 922(d)(5) of Title 18 of the United States Code. (5)  Giving immigration authorities access to interview an individual in agency or department custody. All interview access shall comply with requirements of the TRUTH Act (Chapter 17.2 (commencing with Section 7283)). (c)  (1)  If a California law enforcement agency chooses to participate in a joint law enforcement task force, for which a California law enforcement agency has agreed to dedicate personnel or resources on an ongoing basis, it shall submit a report annually to the Department of Justice, as specified by the Attorney General. The law enforcement agency shall report the following information, if known, for each task force of which it is a member: (A)  The purpose of the task force. (B)  The federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies involved. (C)  The total number of arrests made during the reporting period. (D)  The number of people arrested for immigration enforcement purposes. (2)  All law enforcement agencies shall report annually to the Department of Justice, in a manner specified by the Attorney General, the number of transfers pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a), and the offense that allowed for the transfer, pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (a). (3)  All records described in this subdivision shall be public records for purposes of the California Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250)), including the exemptions provided by that act and, as permitted under that act, personal identifying information may be redacted prior to public disclosure. To the extent that disclosure of a particular item of information would endanger the safety of a person involved in an investigation, or would endanger the successful completion of the investigation or a related investigation, that information shall not be disclosed. (4)  If more than one California law enforcement agency is participating in a joint task force that meets the reporting requirement pursuant to this 90 Ch. 495— 9 — section, the joint task force shall designate a local or state agency responsible for completing the reporting requirement. (d)  The Attorney General, by March 1, 2019, and annually thereafter, shall report on the total number of arrests made by joint law enforcement task forces, and the total number of arrests made for the purpose of immigration enforcement by all task force participants, including federal law enforcement agencies. To the extent that disclosure of a particular item of information would endanger the safety of a person involved in an investigation, or would endanger the successful completion of the investigation or a related investigation, that information shall not be included in the Attorney General’s report. The Attorney General shall post the reports required by this subdivision on the Attorney General’s Internet Web site. (e)  This section does not prohibit or restrict any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, federal immigration authorities, information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of an individual, or from requesting from federal immigration authorities immigration status information, lawful or unlawful, of any individual, or maintaining or exchanging that information with any other federal, state, or local government entity, pursuant to Sections 1373 and 1644 of Title 8 of the United States Code. (f)  Nothing in this section shall prohibit a California law enforcement agency from asserting its own jurisdiction over criminal law enforcement matters. 7284.8. (a)  The Attorney General, by October 1, 2018, in consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, shall publish model policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible consistent with federal and state law at public schools, public libraries, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, courthouses, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement facilities, the Agricultural Labor Relations Board, the Division of Workers Compensation, and shelters, and ensuring that they remain safe and accessible to all California residents, regardless of immigration status. All public schools, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, and courthouses shall implement the model policy, or an equivalent policy. The Agricultural Labor Relations Board, the Division of Workers’ Compensation, the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, shelters, libraries, and all other organizations and entities that provide services related to physical or mental health and wellness, education, or access to justice, including the University of California, are encouraged to adopt the model policy. (b)  For any databases operated by state and local law enforcement agencies, including databases maintained for the agency by private vendors, the Attorney General shall, by October 1, 2018, in consultation with appropriate stakeholders, publish guidance, audit criteria, and training recommendations aimed at ensuring that those databases are governed in a manner that limits the availability of information therein to the fullest extent practicable and consistent with federal and state law, to anyone or any entity 90 — 10 —Ch. 495 for the purpose of immigration enforcement. All state and local law enforcement agencies are encouraged to adopt necessary changes to database governance policies consistent with that guidance. (c)  Notwithstanding the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2), the Department of Justice may implement, interpret, or make specific this chapter without taking any regulatory action. 7284.10. (a)  The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall: (1)  In advance of any interview between the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and an individual in department custody regarding civil immigration violations, provide the individual with a written consent form that explains the purpose of the interview, that the interview is voluntary, and that he or she may decline to be interviewed or may choose to be interviewed only with his or her attorney present. The written consent form shall be available in English, Spanish, Chinese, Tagalog, Vietnamese, and Korean. (2)  Upon receiving any ICE hold, notification, or transfer request, provide a copy of the request to the individual and inform him or her whether the department intends to comply with the request. (b)  The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall not: (1)  Restrict access to any in-prison educational or rehabilitative programming, or credit-earning opportunity on the sole basis of citizenship or immigration status, including, but not limited to, whether the person is in removal proceedings, or immigration authorities have issued a hold request, transfer request, notification request, or civil immigration warrant against the individual. (2)  Consider citizenship and immigration status as a factor in determining a person’s custodial classification level, including, but not limited to, whether the person is in removal proceedings, or whether immigration authorities have issued a hold request, transfer request, notification request, or civil immigration warrant against the individual. 7284.12. The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application. SEC. 4. Section 11369 of the Health and Safety Code is repealed. SEC. 5. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code. O 90 Ch. 495— 11 — SB54/ Immigration Policy Captain Roy Leon SENATE BILL 54 ▪Senate Bill 54, also known as the California Values Act, was signed in 2017 and went into effect on January 1st, 2018. The primary purpose of Senate Bill 54 is to limit the involvement of local and state law enforcement agencies, in federal immigration enforcement, aiming to protect immigrant communities. SENATE BILL 54 ▪Key aspects of Senate Bill 54 include: ▪Restricting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. The bill prevents local law enforcement agencies from using their resources to assist federal immigration enforcement, such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), unless it is related to specific criminal cases or public safety concerns. SENATE BILL 54 ▪Local law enforcement is restricted from transferring individuals to ICE custody for deportation purposes. ▪The law allows certain exceptions, such as when individuals have been convicted of certain serious felonies, or if they are being sought for a criminal investigation related to a violent crime. ▪i.e.-Rape, Child Abuse, Kidnapping, Homicide SENATE BILL 54 ▪The law is intended to build trust between immigrant communities and local law enforcement by ensuring that people are not afraid to report crimes or cooperate with the police, due to fear of deportation. SRPD POLICY 413 Immigration Violations ▪The purpose of SRPD Policy 413 is to provide guidelines to members of the San Rafael Police Department relating to immigration and interacting with federal immigration officials. ▪It is the policy of the San Rafael Police Department that all members make personal and professional commitments to equal enforcement of the law and equal service to the public. Confidence in this commitment will increase the effectiveness of this department in protecting and serving the entire community and recognizing the dignity of all persons, regardless of their national origin or immigration status. SRPD POLICY 413 Immigration Violations ▪To encourage crime reporting and cooperation in the investigation of criminal activity, all individuals, regardless of their immigration status, must feel secure that contacting or being addressed by members of law enforcement will not automatically lead to immigration inquiry and/or deportation. While it may be necessary to determine the identity of a victim or witness, members shall treat all individuals equally and not in any way that would violate the United States or California constitutions. SRPD POLICY 413 Immigration Violations ▪An officer shall not investigate, interrogate, detain, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes, including a civil violation of federal immigration laws or a related civil warrant (Government Code §7284.6). ▪An officer shall not use immigration authorities as interpreters for law enforcement matters relating to individuals in agency or department custody (Government Code §7284.6). SRPD POLICY 413 Immigration Violations ▪The Department shall not collect any information about an individual's immigration status. No officer shall provide personal information about an individual to any immigration authority, including, but not limited to, the individual's name, physical description, home address, work address, and telephone number unless that information is available to the public (Government Code §7284.6(a)(1)(D); Civil Code §1798.3). SRPD POLICY 413 Immigration Violations ▪Requests by federal immigration officials for assistance from this department should be directed to the Operations Lieutenant through the on-duty supervisor. The Operations Lieutenant is responsible for determining whether the requested assistance would be permitted under the California Values Act (Government Code § 7284.2 et seq.). ▪Full details of the San Rafael Police Department immigration policy can be found on our website at srpd.org CONTACT CAPTAIN ROY LEON 485@srpd.org 415-485-3392