HomeMy WebLinkAboutPolice Advisory & Accountability Committee 2025-11-19 Agenda PacketPOLICE ADVISORY AND ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2025, AT 6:00 PM
In-Person:
San Rafael City Council Chambers
1400 Fifth Ave, San Rafael, California
Virtual:
Watch Online: https://tinyurl.com/PAAC2025
Listen by Phone: (669) 444-9171
Meeting ID: 861 8590 4369
AGENDA
How to participate in the meeting:
•You are welcome to provide comments in person at the meeting. Each speaker will have
2 minutes to provide public comments.
•Submit your comments by email to PAAC@cityofsanrafael.org by 4:00 p.m. the day of
the meeting.
CALL TO ORDER – 6:00 PM
STAFF LIAISON REPORT
1.Other brief program updates or reports on any meetings, conferences,
and/or seminars attended by staff.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
2.Other brief reports on any meetings, conferences, and/or seminars attended by the
Committee members.
MINUTES
3.Approve regular meeting minutes from the October 15, 2025, meeting.
OPEN TIME FOR PUBLIC EXPRESSION
The public is welcome to address the Police Advisory and Accountability Committee at this
time on matters not on the agenda that are within its jurisdiction. Comments may be no longer
than 2 minutes and should be respectful to the community.
OTHER AGENDA ITEMS
If necessary to ensure the completion of the following items, the Chairperson may establish
time limits for individual speakers' presentations.
4.Other Agenda Items:
a.Transparency, Francine Kerridge, Director of the Office of Police Oversight, City of
Long Beach, Mark Wilson, Attorney for Burke, Williams and Sorensen, LLP
Recommendation: Receive the informational report
b.2026 Chair and Vice Chair Selections
Recommendation: Select a Chair and Vice Chair for 2026
c.2026 Meeting Schedule
Recommendation: Adopt a meeting schedule for 2026
d.2025 Draft Annual Report
Recommendation: Provide feedback
ADJOURNMENT
Any records relating to an agenda item, received by a majority or more of the Board less than 72 hours before the meeting, shall be
available for inspection online and in the City Hall large conference room, third floor, 1400 5th Avenue, San Rafael, California, placed
with other agenda-related materials on the table in front of the location prior to the meeting. Sign Language interpreters may be
requested by calling (415) 485-3066 (voice), emailing city.clerk@cityofsanrafael.org, or using the California Telecommunications Relay
Service by dialing “711”, at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Copies of documents are available in accessible formats upon
request
POLICE ADVISORY AND ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE (PAAC)
WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 15, 2025, AT 6:00 PM In-Person:
San Rafael City Council Chambers
1400 Fifth Ave, San Rafael, California
Virtual:
Watch Online:
https://tinyurl.com/PAAC2025
Listen by Phone: (669) 444-9171
Meeting ID: 898-5264-7245#
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Tokolahi called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM and requested a roll call.
ROLL CALL
Present: Member Daniel Alm
Vice Chair Daryoush Davidi
Member Paula Kamena
Member Darlin Ruiz
Chair Fatai Tokolahi
Alternate Member Salamah Locks
Absent: Member Marilyn Alvarez
Member Mydung Nguyen
Alternate Member Karla Valdez
Alternate Member Locks voted in Member Alvarez’s absence.
Staff Present: Cristine Alilovich, City Manager
David Spiller, Police Chief, San Rafael Police Department
Scott Eberle, Lieutenant, San Rafael Police Department
Teresa Komoda, Sr. Mgmt. Analyst II, San Rafael Police Department
Lieutenant Scott Eberle informed the community that the in-person
meeting would also be recorded and streamed live to YouTube and
through Zoom. He noted the two-minute time for public comment and
closed captioning on Zoom.
1.MINUTES
Chair Tokolahi invited public comment; however, there was none.
Member Kamena moved to approve the August 19, 2025, minutes. Member Alm
seconded the motion.
AYES: MEMBERS: Alm, Davidi, Kamena, Locks, Ruiz, Tokolahi,
NOES: MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Alvarez, Nguyen
The motion carried 7-0-2.
OPEN TIME FOR PUBLIC EXPRESSION
Heidi spoke about siloed agenda topics and the DFR program.
Stephen Bingham spoke about the PAAC taking charge, getting work done, and Police
Culture.
Name withheld spoke about the Committee being more engaged and allowing public
comment during Committee Reports.
2. OTHER AGENDA ITEMS
a. RESPONSE TO POLICE CULTURE
Chair Tokolahi invited Committee questions, however, there were none.
Chair Tokolahi invited public comment.
Speakers: Stephen Bingham, Heidi Merchan, Name withheld, Name withheld.
The Committee provided comments.
b. RIPA Working Group
The Committee asked questions.
Chair Tokolahi invited public comment.
Speakers: Tammy Edmonson, Name withheld, Heidi, Stephen Bingham, Name
withheld, Name withheld, Justin.
The Committee provided comments.
STAFF LIAISON REPORT
• Ms. Komoda reminded the Committee of the November agenda items, including
adoption of a 2026 meeting schedule, the selection of a new Chair and Vice Chair,
and the first DRAFT review of the 2025 PAAC Annual Report.
• Lt. Eberle provided the 3rd quarter complaint data. Fifteen complaints have been
received this year. There is one complaint currently in progress. All of the closed
complaints were cleared with dispositions of not sustained, exonerated, or
unfounded.
• City Manager Alilovich spoke about the PAAC staff liaisons from both the City
Manager’s Office and the San Rafael Police Department, the City supporting the
PAAC, maintaining open and respectful dialogue, and communications with the
City Council. She also shared that Francine Tournour, a NACOLE member, will
be one of the presenters at the November 19, 2025, PAAC meeting, speaking on
the topic of Transparency.
• She also shared that the City is supportive of allowing public comment during staff
and committee reports moving forward.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
• Member Alm shared that he participated in National Night Out, attended the City
Council meeting where the E-bike ordinance was passed, and shared his
gratitude for Dr. John Maa, who was an advocate for e-bike safety laws. He also
expressed his request to have staff and committee reports moved to the
beginning of the meeting.
• Member Davidi – nothing to report.
• Member Kamena shared that she met Mr. Morgan for coffee. She further shared
that she attended an event at the Center for Domestic Peace in observance of
Domestic Violence Awareness Month. It is also Latino heritage month, Italian
heritage month, acknowledged the Jewish holidays in October, announced World
Teachers Day, United Nations Day, World Mental Health Day, Diwali, Breast
Cancer Awareness Month. Shared a thanks to Member Locks for 12 years on the
FAST Team. (The Marin County Financial Abuse Specialist Team (FAST)
• Member Locks shared she attended the NACOLE regional two-day meeting in
San Francisco on August 27-28. Chair Tokolahi and Ms. Komoda were also in
attendance. She asked for staff to continue to share about upcoming training
opportunities with the Committee.
• Member Ruiz shared she participated in National Night Out and is working on
coordinating an event in the Canal area for next year.
• Member Tokolahi – nothing to report.
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Tokolahi adjourned the meeting at 8:16 PM.
Teresa Komoda
Teresa Komoda, Staff Liaison
APPROVED THIS _____DAY OF_______, 2025
Page 1 of 10
POLICE ADVISORY AND
ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE
AGENDA REPORT
November 19, 2025
Item 4a
TITLE: TRANSPARENCY
RECOMMENDATION: Receive the informational report.
BACKGROUND:
At the January 11, 2025, Special Meeting, the Police Advisory and Accountability Committee
(PAAC) created its work plan for 2025. One of the priority subjects identified was transparency.
Staff is now presenting this topic for review and discussion. This report aims to equip the PAAC
with the information and context necessary to support and guide transparency-related initiatives.
It is intended to promote informed discussions, ensure alignment with applicable laws and
policies, and reinforce a departmental culture rooted in integrity, openness, and accountability.
This report presents a comprehensive overview of the department’s ongoing transparency efforts,
highlighting key trends, existing challenges, and strategic initiatives to strengthen accountability
and openness. It outlines the San Rafael Police Department’s (SRPD) responsibilities in
upholding public trust, focusing on transparency in operational practices, decision-making
processes, and community engagement. By fostering a culture anchored in integrity and
openness, the department seeks to enhance public confidence and operational effectiveness.
The report also addresses questions and concerns raised by Committee members in response to
the topic of transparency. It aims to provide clarity on specific issues that have been flagged by
committee members, ensuring that their insights and inquiries are thoroughly explored. This
dialogue is essential for fostering a collaborative approach to transparency initiatives, as it allows
the committee to engage directly with the department's strategies and efforts. By analyzing these
concerns, the report seeks to enhance understanding and create actionable solutions that align
with both the community's needs and the department's commitment to accountability.
DISCUSSION:
The San Rafael Police Department is committed to advancing transparency through structured
policies, technological innovations, and inclusive community partnerships. These strategies aim to
build public trust, ensure accountability, and cultivate a departmental culture grounded in
transparency and data-driven decision-making.
As part of ongoing efforts to strengthen transparency and community trust, the SRPD gathered
input from residents through public meetings, advisory committee discussions, and community
outreach events. The feedback provided reflects a strong desire for more open communication.
Recommendations from the community include1:
• Increased Awareness of Complaint Processes-Residents expressed the need for clearer
guidance on how to file complaints against the department, including the various methods
1 https://www.cityofsanrafael.org/policinginsanrafael/
Page 2 of 10
available and what to expect from the process.
• Access to Data on Police Interactions-Residents requested greater access to detailed data
and statistics related to police stops, arrests, use of force, and other forms of community
contact.
• Improved Communication Channels-Suggestions included hosting regular community
meetings, expanding the department’s presence on social media, and utilizing additional
tools to share updates with the public.
• Timely Notifications of Local Events-Residents emphasized the importance of being alerted
to significant incidents or events occurring in their neighborhoods in real time.
In response to this feedback, SRPD has taken meaningful steps to increase the accessibility of
information and foster transparency by regularly publishing reports, statistics, and updates on its
website. These resources provide residents with insight into police activity, departmental policies,
and key community safety initiatives.
The following is a summary and not an exhaustive list of information currently available on SRPD’s
website (http://www.srpd.org).
• Crime and Arrest Logs – Records of incidents and arrests from the past 30 days.
• Incidents - SRPD publishes press releases, critical incidents, and community
outreach events on its main webpage and social media platforms, including
Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter).
• Policy Manual - The full SRPD policy manual, updated regularly to reflect current
laws, best practices, and departmental procedures.
• Use of Force 5-Year Report – SRPD annually publishes a Use of Force Report
along with a five-year trend analysis.
• Annual Report – Detailing crime rates, arrest rates, patrol activity, response times,
community initiatives, and progress toward strategic goals.
• Complaints 5-Year Report - The department keeps a five-year log of all complaints
filed, detailing the nature and disposition of each complaint.
• ALPR Transparency Portal - Information on SRPD’s use of ALPR technology,
including policies, usage statistics, and privacy safeguards.
• How to File a Report - This gives the community the option to file specific crime and
incident reports online.
• File a Commendation or Complaint - The San Rafael Police Department takes
seriously all complaints regarding the service provided by the Department and the
conduct of its members. The Department will accept and address all complaints of
misconduct in accordance with department policy and applicable federal, state, and
local law, municipal and county rules, and the requirements of any collective
Page 3 of 10
bargaining agreements. Clear instructions on how to file complaints or provide
commendations, including options for submitting feedback online or in person.
• Military Equipment (AB481) - California Assembly Bill 481 requires law enforcement
agencies to obtain approval of the applicable governing body (Mayor and City
Council), by adoption of a military equipment use policy, before taking certain
actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment as defined
by the legislature. To help guide this process and create transparency for our
community, the San Rafael Police Department has established a link to all of the
required materials, policy, current applicable equipment, and the full text of the bill.
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 481, the San Rafael Police Department posts its Annual
Military Equipment Use Report on the SRPD website.
• Drone as a First Responder (DFR) - Following the AB481 annual report and
presentation to the PAAC on April 16, 2025, as required under Government Code
§7071 and as outlined in SRPD Policy 706, the San Rafael City Council reviewed
and approved funding for the DFR program during the June 2, 2025, City Council
meeting. DFR is developed to reactively respond to emergency calls, reduce
response times, and enhance service to the community. The department’s DFR
policy is publicly available online for review. To promote transparency, SRPD
utilizes specialized software that automatically tracks and logs all drone flights
launched by the department, with the past 30 days of all drone flights available for
public viewing through the DFR Transparency Portal. SRPD is currently working to
integrate the computer-aided dispatch (CAD) software to provide more detailed
information, such as the type of call to which the drone responded. This information
is expected to be available in the near future. SRPD is actively working to improve
the transparency portal.
• Racial Identity and Profiling Act (RIPA) - SRPD hosts a live RIPA dashboard on the
SRPD website under the transparency page that is updated monthly.
• Recruitment Information – SRPD has created a dedicated webpage for recruiting
sworn and professional staff, such as cadets, records personnel, and dispatchers.
To enhance these recruitment efforts, QR codes have been placed on patrol
vehicles and employee business cards for continuous engagement.
• Staffing, Training, and Recruitment – SRPD provides public access to training
materials and has made its 2024–2026 Recruitment Plan available online for
community review.
In addition to the SRPD, various other organizations provide publicly accessible information that
enables residents to gain a deeper understanding of public safety trends, government
accountability, and community resources. State and federal agencies, such as Peace Officer
Standards and Training (POST), the California Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI), provide access to complaint data, training requirements, crime
statistics, traffic stop data, and broader statewide or national trends through regularly published
reports and dashboards.
What information is publicly available through other sources? Please note this is not an exhaustive
list.
Page 4 of 10
• Peace Officer’s Standards and Training (POST)
• Senate Bill 2 (SB2)
• Peace Officer Decertification List
• Cal Matters Police Records Access Project – statewide SB1421 and SB16 records.
• Marin County Court Information
What information is not available to the public?
• Peace Officer personnel records (Penal Code §832.7) & (Government Code §3300).
• Matters involving active litigation.
• Personally identifiable information (PII) - information such as social security numbers, dates
of birth, driver’s license numbers, home addresses, and telephone numbers.
• Complainant, witness, and victim information
• Criminal History
• Arrest information older than 30 days.
• Complaints - complaints resulting in findings of Exonerated, Not Sustained, or Unfounded.
However, not all investigations resulting in a Sustained disposition are subject to public
disclosure, as certain personnel and investigative records remain confidential under
California Penal Code §832.7 unless they meet the disclosure criteria outlined in SB 1421
and SB 16.
• Information involving juveniles.
• Information under ongoing criminal investigations.
• Information barred by court order.
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), Labor Relations, and Binding Arbitration
In response to inquiries from several PAAC members, this section aims to clarify key topics related
to Memorandums of Understanding (MOU), the PAAC’s role in labor relations, contract
negotiations, and the legal framework governing SRPD’s use of binding arbitration. The following
information is provided to enhance transparency, understanding, and address these important
questions.
1. General Public Sector Employees
California’s public sector labor relations are governed by different laws depending on the
group: Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) applies to local government employees.
2. Public Safety Employees (Police & Fire)
California has special rules recognizing that police officers and firefighters cannot legally
strike. Some city charters or local ordinances require binding arbitration for police and fire
unions as a way to resolve disputes without strikes. The City of San Rafael’s MOU with
the San Rafael Police Association (SRPA) addresses arbitration in sections 7.2 through
7.4.5.
3. What is a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)?
An MOU is a negotiated labor agreement between the City and its employee associations.
It defines wages, hours, benefits, and terms and conditions of employment. All MOUs
covering San Rafael employee groups are publicly accessible on the City’s Human
Resources webpage and can be viewed here.
Page 5 of 10
4. Discipline vs. Contract Disputes
For employee discipline cases (like terminations or suspensions), arbitration may be
required under the union’s MOU. For contract/negotiation impasses, binding arbitration is
only required if the city charter or local ordinance includes that provision.
Binding arbitration is not mandated by state law throughout California. However, some
local jurisdictions, including many police and fire agencies, require it through city charters
or negotiated Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs). This is the case for the SRPD, as
its requirement for binding arbitration comes from the negotiated agreements, rather than
a state-wide mandate for all agencies in California. The SRPA MOU outlines the arbitration
process for disciplinary matters in sections 7.2 through 7.4.5
5. Can PAAC members participate in labor negotiations?
No. Contract negotiations are conducted between the City and employee associations.
The PAAC does not participate in labor negotiations or decisions related to contracts.
6. Why does SRPD use binding arbitration?
Under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA), state law establishes collective bargaining
requirements for public employees in California, including police and fire unions. While the
MMBA does not mandate binding arbitration, it permits local jurisdictions to adopt charter
provisions, ordinances, or agreements that require it. The City of San Rafael has adopted
such a provision in its negotiated agreements. A neutral third-party arbitrator is selected
to hear the matter and issue a ruling in these cases, which requires binding arbitration for
labor disputes involving public safety unions when negotiations reach an impasse. In these
cases, a neutral third-party arbitrator is selected to hear the matter and issue a ruling. The
arbitrator’s decision is final and legally binding on both parties.2
7. Are arbitration hearings public?
No. Arbitration hearings themselves are not open to the public.
8. Are arbitration reports public?
Yes. Arbitration decisions and reports are subject to public disclosure. However, sensitive
information such as witness names or identifying details may be redacted before release
pursuant to the California Public Records Act (CPRA).
9. How is an arbitrator selected?
Section 7.3.3 of the San Rafael Police Association (SRPA) Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) stipulates the following:
2Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (MMBA), Gov. Code §§ 3500–3511. The MMBA authorizes impasse procedures,
including mediation and fact-finding, and allows local agencies to adopt binding arbitration through charter,
ordinance, or memorandum of understanding. The City of San Rafael Charter includes such a requirement
for public safety bargaining units.
Page 6 of 10
The employee (Appellant) may request the appeal be heard by the City Manager or
may request arbitration. If arbitration is requested, representatives of the City and the
employee (Appellant) shall meet promptly to select a mutually acceptable arbitrator,
and to the extent possible for both parties, the selection of the arbitrator should be
made within 60 days of the request for arbitration. The fees and expenses of the
arbitrator and of a court reporter shall be shared equally by the Association and the
City. A hearing before the arbitrator shall be held within sixty days of the selection of
the Arbitrator unless the mutually acceptable Arbitrator’s schedule does not so permit.
The Arbitrator shall hear each party's case as presented during the hearing and shall
subsequently have the power to affirm, reject, or provide a lesser form of discipline.
Decisions of the Arbitrator on matters properly before them shall be final and binding
on the parties hereto, to the extent permitted by the Charter of the City.
Section 7.4.4 of the SRPA MOU states: Grievances involving interpretation or
application of the MOU:
If unresolved after initial steps, either side may notify the City Manager and request
arbitration. The City and Association meet promptly to choose a mutually acceptable
arbitrator. Costs such as arbitrator and court reporter fees are split equally, while each
side pays its own preparation costs. The hearing must be scheduled within 60 days of
selecting the arbitrator, and the decision rendered within 60 days post-hearing,
schedule permitting.
Lastly, section 7.4.5 of the SRPA MOU speaks to the arbitrator selection process.
Arbitrator Pool.
Beyond state-provided arbitrators (e.g., via the California State Mediation and
Conciliation Service), the City and Association may establish a mutually agreed panel
of arbitrators. This agreed-upon panel is formalized via a side letter attached to the
MOU.
10. Is the SRPD agreement (MOU) with the union on par with other departments? How do
SRPD’s labor agreements compare with other agencies?
Generally, SRPD’s agreements are comparable to those of peer agencies in the region.
Public Information
Staff members of police departments play a crucial role in managing how information regarding
investigations, arrests, and community safety is communicated to the public. The information
release process must carefully balance two important priorities: the public's right to know and the
legal obligations to protect privacy, ensure due process, and maintain the integrity of
investigations.
PAAC members and the Community have raised key questions about the types of information
that can be legally shared, the timeline for releasing such information, and the formats in which it
can be presented. These inquiries emphasize the complexity of the process. Several state and
federal laws impose restrictions on what can be disclosed, including:
• California Public Records Act (CPRA) – Provides public access to government records
while protecting certain sensitive information, such as active investigation details,
Page 7 of 10
personnel files, or confidential informants.
• California Penal Code Section 832.7 (SB 1421 & SB 16) – Requires the release of certain
police personnel records, such as those involving use of force resulting in great bodily
injury or death, the discharge of a firearm, or sustained misconduct, while still protecting
personal privacy.
• Marsy’s Law (California Victims’ Bill of Rights) – Protects the privacy and safety of crime
victims by limiting the release of identifying information.
• Juvenile Privacy Laws (Welfare & Institutions Code §827) – Strictly limits the release of
information involving minors, including arrest or case details.
• Federal Privacy Laws (HIPAA, FERPA, etc.) – Protect health, education, and other
sensitive records connected to specific individuals.
The following section provides a summary of questions and inquiries raised by PAAC members
related to public information and transparency, accompanied by staff responses and clarifications.
1. How and how quickly do personnel matters or complaint information get to the public?
Depending on the nature of the personnel matter or complaint, certain information may
not be subject to public disclosure. Some records are exempt from release under state
law to protect privacy, ongoing investigations, and due process rights.
2. Is this guided by state regs?
Yes, regulations such as SB1421, SB16, and Penal Code §832.7.
3. Who is the primary person/department for compiling mandatory reporting?
Mandatory reporting, such as SB2 records and SB1421 records, are handled through the
Professional Standards Unit (PSU). The September 18, 2024, PAAC meeting included a
presentation by attorney Mark Wilson of Burke, Williams and Sorensen LLP on the topic
of SB2. In addition to these reports, the Support Services Supervisor oversees the
preparation and submission of monthly RIPA reports, Use of Force data, and crime
statistics to both the California Department of Justice and the FBI.
4. What is the audit process for accuracy?
All reports submitted are audited by the receiving agencies (POST, DOJ, FBI). Any errors
or omitted information are identified through this review process and must be corrected
and resubmitted to ensure data accuracy and compliance.
5. Who is involved in sign-off before submission?
The Profession Standards Unit (PSU) Lieutenant handles Peace Officer reports, while the
Support Services Supervisor manages RIPA and crime statistics. The Operations Division
Captain oversees Use of Force reporting to the DOJ and FBI.
6. Who is the primary person for community communication?
Page 8 of 10
The Public Information Officer (PIO), under direction from the Chief of Police, is the
primary person responsible for community communications. This role is currently assigned
to the Administrative Sergeant, but press releases are approved by the PSU.
7. What is the process for drafting communication to the community?
In accordance with SRPD Policy 323, the Public Information Officer (PIO) or designated
supervisor is responsible for drafting informative messages to alert the community to
safety concerns, high-profile incidents, or significant arrests. In situations involving
sensitive information or potential liability, the City Attorney’s Office may be consulted to
review and approve any information before public dissemination, ensuring accuracy, legal
compliance, and the protection of privacy and due process rights.
The Police Department uses several methods to communicate and interact with the public,
including social media posts such as Facebook, X, Instagram, Nextdoor, the City of San
Rafael webpage, other City department webpages, and City Snapshot newsletters.
The type of communication depends on the issue and the target audience. Press releases,
social media updates, and information flyers all play unique roles in offering timely
information, improving transparency, and supporting public safety
Press releases are issued in response to serious or high-profile incidents, critical events,
or matters of community concern. They are also utilized when media attention arises from
SRPD arrests, when media inquiries are received based on public tips, or when
highlighting departmental efforts and accomplishments.
Social Media Posts are used to amplify press releases, provide education on new or
existing laws, announce enforcement or education campaigns (often tied to grant
requirements), explain department functions, advertise community engagement events,
share information on activities and accomplishments, and recruit for open positions.
8. Who is involved in sign-off approval?
Under the general direction of the Chief of Police, the PSU Lieutenant and PIO review and
approve information and communications being released to the public. They coordinate
with other relevant stakeholders, including the City Attorney and the City Manager, as
needed, to guarantee that all communications are accurate and consistent.
9. What are the timeline goals?
The goal of any press release is to disseminate accurate information to the community as
quickly as possible. The Department prioritizes proactive communication to remain
transparent and to mitigate the spread of rumors or misinformation. Staff remain mindful
of media deadlines while ensuring that all information released is thoroughly vetted,
verified for accuracy, and compliant with applicable legal requirements governing the
timing and manner of disclosure.
Senate Bill 1421 (SB1421), also known as Peace Officers: Release of Records, is a California
state law that requires the disclosure of certain police records under the California Public Records
Act. The law makes records involving officer-involved shootings, use-of-force incidents resulting
Page 9 of 10
in great bodily injury or death, as well as cases of sexual assault and acts of dishonesty,
accessible to the public. SB 1421 was signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown on September
30, 2018, and took effect on January 1, 2019.
Effective January 1, 2019, SB 1421 amended Penal Code §832.7, generally making all peace
officer personnel records and information confidential and exempt from disclosure, except by
motion in a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding. SB 1421 created exceptions to these
confidentiality rules for certain categories of peace officer personnel and police investigatory
records:
(A) Records related to the report, investigation, or findings of (i) an incident involving an
officer-involved shooting; or (ii) an incident where an officer's use of force results in
death or great bodily injury (GBI).
(B) Records pertaining to an incident involving a sustained finding of sexual assault by
an officer against a member of the public; and
(C) Records related to an incident with a sustained finding of dishonesty by an officer,
directly connected to the reporting, investigation, or prosecution of a crime or a
misconduct investigation involving another officer.
Annually, the SRPD releases Use of Force statistics accompanied by a five-year analysis on its
transparency page. This report details the frequency and categories of force used, annual arrest
statistics, and yearly police incident data.
Every Use of Force incident undergoes a comprehensive internal review to ensure accountability,
compliance with policy, and adherence to best practices. The review process begins with an initial
audit by a supervisor (a Corporal or Sergeant) and progresses through multiple levels of oversight,
including review by a Lieutenant, the division Captain, and ultimately the Chief of Police. Both
written reports and Body-Worn Camera (BWC) footage are examined to verify accuracy and
completeness. A subject matter expert (SME) from the Self-defense and Tactics Team (SDAT) is
also often called upon to review use-of-force incidents.
Additionally, as required under statutes such as SB1421, SB16, and AB748, SRPD publishes
incidents involving the discharge of a firearm, or use of force resulting in great bodily injury, or
death.
Community Engagement & Trust
Community engagement is a cornerstone of effective, transparent policing. The SRPD actively
prioritizes public interaction through structured events, open forums, and outreach initiatives
designed to foster dialogue, mutual understanding, and collaborative problem-solving. These
engagements serve not only as opportunities for officers to connect with residents but also as
vital platforms for sharing information, answering questions, and listening to community concerns.
By creating spaces for open communication, whether through Community Academies, Coffee
with a Cop, neighborhood walks, or youth outreach programs such as Camp Chance, the
department enhances operational transparency. Residents gain direct insight into policing
strategies, decision-making processes, and departmental priorities. In turn, the department
receives valuable community input that informs policy development and service improvements.
This two-way exchange helps demystify law enforcement practices, correct misinformation, and
Page 10 of 10
demonstrate a commitment to accountability. Over time, sustained engagement fosters public
trust, increases legitimacy, and strengthens the community's confidence in its police department
as a responsive, transparent, and collaborative partner in public safety.
Transparency is a fundamental aspect of SRPD’s commitment to fostering and sustaining public
trust. The department disseminates extensive information through various channels, participates
in community-centric initiatives, and adheres to state and federal disclosure requirements.
Challenges remain in balancing transparency with legal restrictions, protecting sensitive
information, and addressing community expectations. Expanding communication strategies,
improving data accessibility, and continuing community engagement will strengthen SRPD’s
culture of integrity, accountability, and openness.
One of the reasons the PAAC was established was to “…improve public transparency and
accountability with respect to the San Rafael Police Department and provide greater community
participation…” According to the PAAC Bylaws, PAAC members have several defined roles in
supporting transparency. Key sections include:
• The Committee’s purpose is to “provide input to improve public transparency and
accountability with respect to the San Rafael Police Department …”
• PAAC will “promote community interest and understanding of police operations, policy,
priorities, and community relations.”
• PAAC will “promote SRPD understanding of the priorities and requests of community
members.”
• The Committee will “prioritize effective communication and collaboration with SRPD … in
an effort to foster relationships that promote accountability, transparency, and
effectiveness in its work.”
In anticipation of developing the 2026 Workplan, City staff invites the PAAC to consider what
specific steps and initiatives PAAC members can take to build trust and strengthen connections
between the SRPD and the community in the coming year.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.
Submitted by:
Teresa Komoda
Teresa Komoda
Senior Management Analyst II
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Transparency Presentation - Francine Kerridge
Transparency
Francine Kerridge
Sir Robert Peel –Policing Principles
Principle 9-To recognize always that the test of police
efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder,and not
the visible evidence of police action in dealing with
them.(circa 1829)
2
Defining
Transparency in
Policing
Transparency Builds Public Trust and
Cooperation
Transparency
Strengthens
Accountability and
Performance
5
Transparency Aligns Oversight and Police
Goals
6
Key Takeaways
Thank
you
Page 1 of 2
POLICE ADVISORY AND
ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE
AGENDA REPORT
November 19, 2025
Item 4b
TITLE: CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR ELECTIONS
RECOMMENDATION:
Nominate and appoint a Chair and Vice Chair to the Police Advisory and Accountability Committee
(“Committee”) for the period January 2026 – December 2026.
BACKGROUND:
According to the City of San Rafael’s Rules and Procedures for Boards, Commissions, and
Committees (BCCs) (English / Spanish), this Committee is responsible for appointing one (1)
representative as Board Chair and one (1) representative as Vice-Chair.
The role of the Chair is to facilitate meetings per the posted agendas, ensure that the public and
committee members have adequate time to comment, and maintain decorum throughout the
meeting. The role of the Vice Chair is to perform the above duties in the absence of the Chair.
DISCUSSION:
As defined in Rules and Procedures (English / Spanish), the election shall be by majority vote;
the term of service shall be one (1) year, beginning in January. The respective Chair and Vice-
Chair appointments are to be rotated among the Committee based on tenure. In the case of
identical term limits, tenure shall be determined by alphabetical order of last name.
The Rules and Procedures (English / Spanish) also note that in the event the current Chair or
Vice-Chair has served less than one year, the Board may choose to re-elect them for an additional
term. Additionally, if there is limited tenure among the other Committee members, then a
Committee member may be appointed as an officer more than once in the number of years there
are members. The Chair and Vice Chair shall serve a term of one (1) year, but not more than two
(2) consecutive terms. However, if there is a vacancy, the Committee has the authority to extend
the current representative’s term at its discretion.
The Committee Chair and Vice Chair have distinct responsibilities from those of other Committee
Members and must be appointed.
The duties of the Chair include:
1. Ensure that consideration of items on the agenda moves along without delay.
2. Ensure that petitioners, proponents, and opponents are heard.
3. Ensure that decorum is maintained at the meeting.
4. In presiding over agendized matters where the public has provided testimony
and/or raised questions, the Chair should do the following:
a. Direct questions or comments requiring a response from staff.
b. If necessary, help keep Committee members' questions relevant to the
Page 2 of 2
matter being considered by the BCC.
c. If necessary, consider calling for a brief recess if orderly conduct of the
meeting is being disrupted.
5. Announce the decision of the BCC on all subjects.
6. Ensure that each member of the BCC is provided an opportunity to completely
express their views on items of business. The Chair should see that each
Committee member has been recognized by the Chair and given the
opportunity to provide feedback.
7. Correspond with the City Council on behalf of the BCC, provided that
opinions expressed on behalf of the BCC or the City government are
consistent with the consensus of the BCC.
In the absence of the Chair, a Vice-Chair shall possess all powers of the Chair and be subject to
all prescribed duties for that position during the meeting.
Nomination of Committee Members to serve as Chair and Vice-Chair for the coming year can be
made by any of the current Committee Members in attendance at the meeting when nominations
are made.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Submitted by:
Teresa Komoda
Teresa Komoda
Senior Management Analyst II
Page 1 of 1
POLICE ADVISORY AND
ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE
AGENDA REPORT
November 19, 2025
Item 4c
TITLE: COMMITTEE MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 2026
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Police Advisory and Accountability Committee (“Committee”) review,
revise as necessary, and adopt the 2026 meeting schedule.
BACKGROUND:
According to Article 3, Section 3.1 of the Committee Bylaws, the schedule for the upcoming year
will be set by December of the previous year.
DISCUSSION:
City staff has prepared a draft meeting schedule for the Committee’s review and discussion, as
outlined below. The Committee may choose to adopt the schedule as presented or make
adjustments. Meetings are typically held on the third Wednesday of each month unless the
meeting date conflicts with a holiday. Also, meeting dates may be canceled due to a lack of
quorum or agenda items.
As requested by the PAAC during its November 2024 meeting, no regular meetings have been
proposed for July or December to provide breaks during the summer and winter holiday periods.
However, the Committee may decide to schedule meetings in those months if needed.
Additionally, a special meeting is scheduled for Saturday, January 10, 2026, to focus on the 2026
work plan.
Date Time Location
Saturday, January 10, 2026 * 9:00 a.m. City Council Chambers
Wednesday, January 21, 2026 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers
Wednesday, February 18, 2026 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers
Wednesday, March 18, 2026 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers
Wednesday, April 15, 2026 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers
Wednesday, May 20, 2026 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers
Wednesday, June 17, 2026 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers
Wednesday, August 19, 2026 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers
Wednesday, September 16, 2026 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers
Wednesday, October 21, 2026 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers
Wednesday, November 18, 2026 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers
Submitted by:
Teresa Komoda
Teresa Komoda
Senior Management Analyst II
Page 1 of 2
POLICE ADVISORY AND
ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE
AGENDA REPORT
November 19, 2025
Item 4d
TITLE: POLICE ADVISORY AND ACCOUNTABILITY 2025 ANNUAL REPORT
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and provide feedback on the report.
BACKGROUND:
On June 5, 2023, the San Rafael City Council approved Resolution No. 15225, which established
the Police Advisory and Accountability Committee (PAAC). The Council tasked staff with
collaborating with the Committee to develop its bylaws and define its goals and objectives, while
also encouraging residents to apply for membership. The PAAC was created to foster trust
between the community and the Police Department, enhancing both transparency and
accountability.
The Committee's main purpose is to provide insights that enhance public transparency and
accountability within the San Rafael Police Department (SRPD). It aims to increase community
involvement in recommending policies, practices, and procedures related to policing, including
community relations, hiring practices, and training standards.
DISCUSSION:
Pursuant to PAAC Bylaws Section 1.3, it shall be the function and duty of the Committee to:
• Act as a sounding board for the Community, City Council, the City Manager, and the Police
Department regarding community needs and concerns, as well as provide community
feedback to proposed police programs and priorities.
• Make recommendations to the City Council regarding police policy, procedures, hiring
practices, training, and best practices.
• Request data related to SRPD operations, which shall be presented and accessible during
public meetings of the Committee to the extent permitted by law.
• Conduct ongoing community outreach and engagement efforts with all communities.
• Public reports detailing the engagement efforts and other work of the committee over the
course of the year shall be produced annually at a Police Advisory and Accountability
Committee and presented at a City Council meeting to inform the community of the work
of the Committee.
• In an effort to foster relationships that promote accountability, transparency, and
effectiveness in its work, the Committee will prioritize effective communication and
collaboration with SRPD.
Page 2 of 2
• Advise the City Council, the City Manager, the Committee members, and the Police
Department on matters associated with the following:
1. Improve the feeling of safety and security.
2. Increase cultural competencies, empathy, and customer service skills.
3. Build trust and improve relationships with the community.
4. Increase diversity of the police department workforce.
5. Improve transparency, communication, and accountability
The 2025 Annual Report, in compliance with the PAAC bylaws, is provided as Attachment 1.
This Annual Report outlines the activities undertaken by the PAAC throughout the year,
including the development of the workplan, training topics addressed, presentations delivered,
and recommendations proposed by Committee members.
The recommendations made by the committee members are comprehensively documented in
the 2025 Annual Report. This report also includes an overview of the status and feedback from
SRPD. Upon finalization, the 2025 Annual Report will be formally presented to the City Council
in early 2026.
Teresa Komoda
Teresa Komda
Senior Management Analyst II
ATTACHMENTS:
1. 2025 PAAC Annual Report
2025 Annual Report
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1
STRUCTURE ................................................................................................................... 1
COMMITTEE MEETINGS ............................................................................................... 2
COMMITTEE WORK ...................................................................................................... 2
COMMITTEE WORK PLAN ................................................................................................ 2
PRESENTATIONS AND SPEAKERS ..................................................................................... 4
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................... 5
COMPLAINT DATA ......................................................................................................... 13
WORKING GROUPS ....................................................................................................... 14
TRAINING, DEVELOPMENT, AND CONFERENCES.................................................. 17
ORAL BOARD PARTICIPATION ........................................................................................ 18
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND FUTURE GOALS ......................................................... 19
1
E XECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Police Advisory and Accountability Committee (PAAC) is pleased to present the 2025
Annual Report for the City of San Rafael. Established on June 5, 2023, through the
adoption of Resolution No. 15225 by the San Rafael City Council, the PAAC aims to foster
trust, enhance transparency, and improve accountability within the San Rafael Police
Department (SRPD).
The second annual report emphasizes the PAAC’s ongoing commitment to fostering
meaningful dialogue between the community and police regarding practices and policies.
Building on the foundation established in the initial report, this document highlights the
progress made over the past year, key achievements, and ongoing initiatives designed
to improve trust, transparency, and accountability.
The PAAC recognizes the crucial role of collaboration between the SRPD and the
community it serves. The Committee’s efforts are grounded in the belief that transparent
and accountable policing is vital for building public trust and ensuring a safe and equitable
environment for all residents and businesses.
This report outlines the Committee’s goals and objectives, summarizes significant
initiatives and community engagement activities, presents recommendations to the City
Council, and offers a forward-looking perspective on the priorities the Committee intends
to pursue in the upcoming year.
STRUCTURE
Committee members must be residents of the City of San Rafael and pledge their
commitment to impartiality, objectivity, and fairness. The PAAC aims to ensure that its
membership is inclusive and representative of the community's diverse backgrounds.
This includes but is not limited to considerations of race, ethnicity, age, gender identity,
sexual orientation, economic status, and various communities of interest.
To be eligible for membership, individuals must be at least 18 years old, except for one
designated seat reserved for a youth member aged 17 to 26. Importantly, applicants are
not required to possess specialized knowledge or skills to serve on the Committee. The
current Committee comprises the following members:
Name Term Expiration
Paula Kamena 10/2027
Darlin Ruiz 10/2027
Daryoush Davidi 10/2027
Mydung Nguyen 10/2027
2
Marilyn Alvarez – Youth Member 10/2025 1
Kennedy Rodas – Youth Member 10/20291
Fatai Tokolahi 10/2029 2
Daniel Alm 10/2029 3
Salamah Locks – Alternate 10/2027
Karla Valdez - Alternate 10/2027
COMMITTEE MEETINGS
The PAAC held ten meetings in 2025, including a Special Meeting on January 11, 2025,
to develop the annual work plan. Regular committee meetings take place in the City
Council chambers located at 1400 Fifth Ave, San Rafael, CA 94901, and are broadcast
live online. Archived videos and materials from these meetings can also be accessed
online at the following URL: https://www.cityofsanrafael.org/paac-meetings/.
The regular meetings convene the Committee to conduct business as a whole body and
invite public comments in an open forum where ideas, concerns, and input are
exchanged. Public feedback is highly encouraged and may also be submitted
electronically in advance of the meeting. Post-meeting video recordings and meeting
minutes are also made available on the Committee website for full transparency.
The table below lists meeting dates and topics presented to the Committee in 2025.
COMMITTEE WORK
During the December 4, 2024, meeting, the Committee elected Fatai Tokolahi as Chair
and Daryoush Davidi as Vice Chair for 2025. A new Chair and Vice Chair will be elected
for 2026 during the November 19, 2025, meeting.
COMMITTEE WORK PLAN
In 2025, the Committee created its annual work plan during a special meeting held on
January 11, 2025. The topics suggested by Committee members were prioritized based
on majority votes. The work plan acts as a strategic guide for the Committee's discussions
and initiatives. It includes key training sessions and significant discussions aimed at
developing recommendations to enhance community relationships by promoting
transparency and improving SRPD practices.
The 2025 Work Plan was developed by the Police Advisory and Accountability Committee
(PAAC) members to help fulfill their mission. The plan provides guidance to the San
1 Member Alvarez ended her term at the end of October 2025, and Member Rodas was appointed in October
2025.
2 Member Tokolahi was selected for a second term from 2025-2029.
3 Member Alm was selected for a second term from 2025-2029.
3
Rafael City Council on issues related to the SRPD, including training, hiring practices,
and accountability efforts.
The table below reflects the topics discussed at the January 11, 2025, Special Meeting,
along with the number of Committee members interested in each subject.
Topic PAAC Members Interested in Topic
Youth and Policing 8
Police Culture 7
Prostitution/Human-Trafficking 6
Transparency 6
ICE/Immigration 6
Homelessness 5
AB481 4
RIPA 4
Traffic Safety 3
Collective bargaining 2
Police Academy 2
Pretext Stops 2
Theft and Burglary 2
Technology/Drones 1
Language Interpretation 1
Press Release Timelines 1
Use of Force 1
Bylaws 1
Complaint Data 1
Tie Breaking 2nd Round Vote
RIPA 5
Police Wellness 3
4
PRESENTATIONS AND SPEAKERS
The PAAC hosted a series of presentations designed to deepen community engagement
and enhance understanding of policing practices. This series featured a diverse group of
speakers—including legal experts, city employees, police department representatives,
subject-matter specialists, and community advocates—who addressed key issues in
public safety, policing practices, and accountability.
The table below reflects the 2025 schedule of topics and presenters as a result of the
work plan created by the Committee. It highlights the Committee’s primary achievements,
focus areas, and ongoing initiatives throughout the year. Together, these efforts
demonstrate the Committee’s continued progress in promoting transparency,
strengthening community trust, and fostering continuous improvement within the SRPD’s
operations and practices.
Month Agenda Items Presenters
January
1.2024 Annual Report
2. Downtown Speed Limits,
Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43)
PAAC Staff Liaisons
Jimmy Jessup, Parametrix
Eugelyn Lopez, Junior Engineer
Joanna Kwok, Asst. Public Works
Director
February U.S. Customs and Immigration
California Values Act (SB 54) Roy Leon, Capt. SRPD
March
Racial Identity and
Profiling Act
(RIPA) AB 953
David Swing, Former RIPA Advisory
Board Member
Kyle Williams, RIPA Analyst, Marin
County
PAAC Staff Liaisons
April AB481 Military Equipment Scott Eberle, Lt. SRPD
May
1. RIPA
2. Homelessness
Tammy Edmonson, MVFREE
Daniel Cooperman, Community
Services Director
Lynn Murphy, Mental Health Outreach
Liaison
June Human Trafficking Chris Duncan, Sgt. SRPD
August Police Culture
Beth Dansie, Public Safety Family
Counseling Group
Mike Mathis, San Rafael Police
Employees Association
PAAC Staff Liaisons
September Meeting Canceled
5
Month Agenda Items Presenters
October RIPA - Work Group Update
PAAC Staff Liaisons
PAAC Work Group Members: Davidi,
Kamena, Tokolahi,
November 1. Transparency
2. 2025 Annual Report
Francine Kerridge, Police Oversight
Director, City of Long Beach
Mark Wilson, Burke, Williams, and
Sorensen, LLP
PAAC Staff Liaisons
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
Over the course of the year, Committee members have provided both individual and
collective recommendations for inclusion in this report for the City Council’s consideration.
These recommendations are informed by insights gained through guest speaker
presentations, training sessions, data collection and analysis, as well as the Committee’s
thoughtful inquiries and discussions.
Individual members made some recommendations independently, while others were
presented, discussed, and formally adopted by motion and recorded with a vote. The
following summary outlines the range of recommendations put forth for the City Council’s
review and consideration.
January 15, 2025, Meeting
The following formal motions were made during this meeting, with the listed
recommendations:
2024 PAAC Annual Report
Member Kamena moved to accept the 2024 PAAC Annual Report with a change in
verbiage on page 10 of the Annual Report from the term recommendation to topic under
the Youth and Policing item, along with amending the introductory language under the
Committee Recommendations section to reflect that the recommendations were diverse
amongst Committee members. Member Ruiz seconded the motion.
AYES: MEMBERS: Alm, Alvarez, Davidi, Kamena, Nguyen, Ruiz,
Tokolahi
NOES: MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: MEMBERS: None
Status: The 2024 PAAC Annual Report was formally presented to the City Council on
February 18, 2025. Former Chair Kamena, in collaboration with the PAAC Staff Liaisons,
delivered the presentation.
6
Downtown Speed Limits (AB 43)
Following the presentation, no formal motion was made by the Committee; however,
several comments and requests were noted in response.
Members Alvarez, Nguyen, Ruiz, and Valdez asked for other areas of the City to be
studied and mentioned areas surrounding schools.
Status: An Ordinance regarding speed limit changes was presented to the City Council
by the Public Works Department for consideration on February 18, 2025.
Member Alm requested that Traffic Safety be included as a discussion topic, which he
raised at the special meeting. He further stated that it is a priority when he speaks with
community members.
Status: Under Consideration. Traffic Safety can be brought back for consideration as a
priority topic for the 2026 Workplan.
Member Alm requested that the results of the Speed Creep be provided, for a traffic study
to be conducted to include Second and Third Street, increase traffic enforcement on
Second and Third Street, and to reduce the speed limit on Miracle Mile from 35 to 30
mph.
Status: The request for increased traffic enforcement was forwarded to the SRPD Traffic
and Patrol Divisions. The remaining items are not under the purview of SRPD; therefore,
they are referred to Public Works for consideration.
SRPD Response: Traffic safety and enforcement continue to be key priorities for the
SRPD. Throughout 2025, the Traffic Division focused on rebuilding its staffing levels as
resources allowed. The division is currently staffed with one Sergeant, one Corporal, and
three Officers, representing a significant improvement from 2024, when it operated with
only one Sergeant and one Officer. This increased staffing capacity allows for a more
consistent presence in traffic enforcement, education, and collision reduction efforts
across the community.
Member Ruiz requested that all outreach materials for AB 43 be translated into Spanish,
requested a speed survey, and requested outreach in the Canal neighborhood.
Status: These requests were referred to Public Works for consideration.
February 19, 2025, Meeting
U.S. Customs and Immigration
No formal motion was made during this meeting; however, Committee members shared
the following recommendations.
Members Ruiz and Valdez recommended that SRPD provide outreach materials, such as
an FAQ, in both hard copy and online formats to address misinformation and share
information with the community.
7
Status: Completed. This information, along with a detailed FAQ, is published in English,
Spanish, and Vietnamese online at SRPD.org, and the information was emailed to all
PAAC members in April 2025.
SRPD Response: SRPD supports efforts to ensure that community members have clear,
accessible information about the law and its implications.
Member Locks requested “Red Cards” be provided.
Status: Completed. The link to the “Red Cards” was included in the outreach materials
published in April 2025. Also, the City purchased “Red Cards” for distribution at City Hall
and other City facilities.
SRPD Response: Same as above.
Members Alvarez and Ruiz requested outreach efforts and materials for youth through
the schools, so students can share them with their families at home.
Status: Completed. Outreach materials and efforts were shared with the San Rafael City
Schools District partners.
SRPD Response: Same as above.
March 19, 2025, Meeting
The following formal motion was made during this meeting, with the listed
recommendations:
Public Comment Period
During the meeting on February 19, 2025, Member Locks requested that the public
comment time limit be included on the agenda for a future meeting. Staff presented this
item for discussion at the March 19, 2025, meeting. Following the Committee’s
deliberations,
Member Alm made a motion to maintain the public comment duration period at two
minutes. Member Ruiz seconded the motion.
AYES: MEMBERS: Alm, Kamena, Nguyen, Ruiz, Tokolahi, Valdez
NOES: MEMBERS: Davidi
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Alvarez
Status: Completed. The Committee voted to maintain the two-minute public comment
period.
Racial Identity and Profiling Act (RIPA)
No formal motion was made after the RIPA presentation at the March meeting; however,
the Committee members provided the following comments and recommendations.
8
Members Ruiz and Locks requested that a report be produced that identifies mechanical
violations.
Status: Completed, staff provided this material at the May 21, 2025, meeting.
SRPD Response: The Department is committed to providing detailed reports and
statistical information whenever possible.
Members Alm and Locks requested to invite MVFREE to return at a future meeting and
provide a presentation on RIPA.
Status: Completed. MVFREE was invited and returned at the May 21, 2025, meeting.
SRPD Response: The Department welcomes guest presentations and values the
opportunity to engage with community members and partner agencies while contributing
to community dialogue and learning.
Member Ruiz inquired about the most common violations and reasons for stops of Latinx
drivers.
Status: Completed, staff provided this material at the May 21, 2025, meeting.
SRPD Response: The Department is committed to providing detailed reports and
statistical information whenever possible.
Member Alm requested that the discussion on the topic of RIPA be continued to a future
meeting.
Status: Completed. RIPA was agendized at the May 21, 2025, meeting, where staff
presented additional data as requested, and MVFREE provided a presentation on RIPA.
SRPD Response: The Department continues to be dedicated to providing detailed reports
and thorough statistical data whenever feasible. Additionally, the Department encourages
guest presentations and appreciates opportunities to connect with community members
and partner agencies.
April 16, 2025 Meeting
Military Equipment (AB 481)
The following formal motion was made during this meeting:
Member Kamena moved that the PAAC unanimously support and recommend the Drone
First Responder (DFR) program to the City Council. Member Davidi seconded the
motion.
AYES: MEMBERS: Alm, Alvarez, Davidi, Kamena, Ruiz, Tokolahi, Valdez
NOES: MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Nguyen
9
Status: Completed. The San Rafael Police Department presented its Annual AB 481
Report, as required by statute, during the City Council meeting on June 2, 2025. The
report included a request for the acquisition of new equipment to support the
implementation of the Drone as a First Responder (DFR) program. Following the
presentation, the City Council approved the contract and associated purchases. The DFR
program has since entered the implementation and training phases, marking a significant
step toward expanding the Department’s technology-driven public safety initiatives.
SRPD Response: The San Rafael Police Department supports this program, which also
aligns with City Council Strategic Plan Objective E.2.1, Enhance community safety
through innovative programs that strengthen neighborhood security and public safety,
and reduce emergency response times of Police Priority 1 calls, and enhance community
safety and operational efficiency.
May 21, 2025 Meeting
Racial Identity and Profiling Act (RIPA)
The following formal motions were made during this meeting, with the listed
recommendations:
Member Kamena moved to recommend that SRPD adopt a Bias by Proxy policy. Member
Alm seconded the motion.
AYES: MEMBERS: Alm, Alvarez, Kamena, Nguyen, Ruiz, Tokolahi, Valdez
NOES: MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Davidi
Status: SRPD has adopted a Bias by Proxy Policy
SRPD Response: The Department concurred with this recommendation and
implemented a new policy to address Bias by Proxy. SRPD Policy 401.1
Member Alvarez moved to recommend SRPD adopt MVFREE recommendation #2-
Adopt a one-year pilot program eliminating pre-text stops. Member Ruiz seconded the
motion.
AYES: MEMBERS: Alm, Alvarez, Nguyen, Ruiz, Tokolahi, Valdez
NOES: MEMBERS: Kamena
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Davidi
Status: This recommendation is under consideration.
SRPD Response: The Department does not support implementing this recommendation.
Categorizing all administrative or equipment-related stops as “pretextual” oversimplifies
the range of legitimate enforcement actions officers undertake. Proactive enforcement
efforts, including specific types of traffic stops, are vital in enhancing public safety and
10
meeting community expectations for decreasing crime. Additionally, many of these
violations, such as those related to equipment failures or vehicle safety, are essential for
maintaining roadway safety for both drivers and pedestrians.
Member Alm moved to recommend SRPD adopt MVFREE recommendation #3- “Use a
performance metric to monitor the progress on recommended RIPA strategies.” Member
Kamena seconded the motion.
AYES: MEMBERS: Alm, Alvarez, Kamena, Nguyen, Ruiz, Tokolahi, Valdez
NOES: MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Davidi
Status: This recommendation is under consideration.
SRPD Response: SRPD is supportive and acknowledges the positive impact of
performance measures. This recommendation aligns with the development of an equity
dashboard as outlined in recommendation #4.
Member Alm moved to recommend SRPD adopt MVFREE recommendation #4-
“Establish an annual RIPA equity assessment.” Member Kamena seconded the motion.
AYES: MEMBERS: Alm, Alvarez, Kamena, Nguyen, Ruiz, Tokolahi, Valdez
NOES: MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: MEMBERS: Davidi
Status: This recommendation is under consideration.
SRPD Response: The Department strongly encourages a collaborative effort with
Committee members in creating a transparent equity dashboard for public access. This
initiative will not only promote accountability but also foster community trust and
engagement.
June 18, 2025, Meeting
Human Trafficking
The following formal motion was made during this meeting, with the listed
recommendation:
Member Davidi moved to recommend that the City allocate funding to SRPD to staff
additional investigators dedicated to Human Trafficking investigations. Member Kamena
seconded the motion.
AYES: MEMBERS: Alm, Alvarez, Davidi, Kamena, Nguyen, Ruiz, Tokolahi,
NOES: MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: MEMBERS: None
11
Status: This recommendation is under consideration.
SRPD Response: The Department welcomes additional staff and resources to investigate
and combat these types of cases, which are often very challenging.
Members Alm, Alvarez, and Valdez requested staff provide additional statistics on
interactions, arrests, and calls for service related to human trafficking.
Status: Complete. Staff provided the requested information at the August 20, 2025,
meeting.
SRPD Response: SRPD is dedicated to sharing clear, data-driven reports and statistical
information that enhance public understanding and support evidence-based community
partnerships.
Member Kamena recommended that the topic of digital platforms used for grooming
potential human trafficking victims be included as a discussion item in the 2026 Workplan.
Status: This recommendation is under consideration.
SRPD Response: The Police Advisory and Accountability Committee (PAAC) identifies
its priority topics for the year through a collaborative, consensus-based process. SRPD
staff are pleased to facilitate discussions on each topic by providing relevant data,
presentations, and subject-matter expertise to support informed dialogue and
constructive recommendations.
August 20, 2025, Meeting
Police Culture
No formal motions were made during this meeting.
Member Alvarez commented that she wanted more information specific to the culture of
SRPD.
Status: This recommendation is under consideration.
SRPD Response: SRPD and City Staff are more than willing to revisit the topic of Culture
should the Committee choose to identify it as a priority area in the 2026 Workplan. Staff
encourages members to be specific and intentional when providing feedback or
recommendations regarding desired content, focus areas, and outcomes to ensure that
future discussions are meaningful and productive.
Additional recommendations and feedback on the topic of Police Culture are included
under the October 15, 2025 meeting section.
October 15, 2025, Meeting
Police Culture
No formal motions were made during this meeting.
12
In response to the Police Culture presentation from August. The following
recommendations were made by Committee members;
Member Alm recommended that SRPD conduct an Annual Employee Engagement
survey to measure culture.
Status: This recommendation is under consideration.
SRPD Response: Staff appreciates the recommendation to conduct an Annual Employee
Engagement Survey as a way to assess and monitor organizational culture. SRPD
recognizes the value of measuring employee perspectives to support a healthy,
transparent, and inclusive workplace. The Department will explore potential options for
implementing a survey process that aligns with existing City policies, confidentiality
standards, and available resources.
Member Alm recommended more communication and outreach with the community to
better understand their interests and priorities related to this topic and to bring this topic
back for the 2026 Workplan.
Status: This recommendation is under consideration.
SRPD Response: SRPD and City Staff are more than willing to revisit the topic of Culture
should the Committee choose to identify it as a priority area in the 2026 Workplan. Staff
encourages members to be specific and intentional when providing feedback or
recommendations regarding desired content, focus areas, and outcomes to ensure that
future discussions are meaningful and productive. Additionally, the coordination of guest
speakers or presentations will require collaboration with staff to ensure that all deadlines
are met in compliance with the Brown Act, including the timely preparation and review of
staff reports, agenda materials, and scheduling requirements.
Member Locks made the following recommendations and comments: she shared that she
would like to coordinate a guest presenter on this topic in 2026. She further commented
that the presentation focused on wellness, and she wants a presentation more focused
on culture, the work being done to build trust and decrease lawlessness, mistreatment,
and crime
Status: This recommendation is under consideration.
SRPD Response: Same as above.
Members Kamena and Tokolahi noted that if this topic is to be included in the 2026
Workplan, additional efforts should be made to solicit feedback from the community to
better understand their perspectives and specific requests related to the issue.
Status: This recommendation is under consideration.
SRPD Response: Same as above.
November 19, 2025, Meeting
13
Transparency- pending completion of November meeting
2026 Meeting Schedule - pending completion of November meeting
Chair and Vice-Chair Selections - pending completion of November meeting
2025 Annual Report -pending completion of November meeting
COMPLAINT DATA
The PAAC received both quarterly and annual reports from SRPD Staff Liaison
Lieutenant Scott Eberle. At the meeting on January 15, 2025, the Committee was
presented with the annual complaint data for the year 2024. Lieutenant Eberle reported
the following complaint data for 2024:
• 33 Complaints
• 23 Exonerated
• 6 Unfounded
• 2 Sustained
• 2 Pending
• 1 Complaint was for bias
• 1 Complaint was for the use of force
Neither the complaint regarding bias nor the use of force was sustained, and no additional
information is subject to public disclosure under §832.7 of the Penal Code. Annual
complaint data is published on the SRPD Transparency webpage.
The Committee requested more frequent complaint reports from staff; as a result,
quarterly complaint reports were provided to the PAAC throughout 2025.
During the April 16, 2025, meeting, Lieutenant Eberle presented the report on the first
quarter complaints for 2025. A total of three complaints were received. Upon
investigation, all complaints were determined to be unfounded. No additional information
related to these complaints is subject to public disclosure under California Penal Code
§832.7, which protects the confidentiality of peace officer personnel records and related
investigative materials not specifically authorized for release under state law. Only
records that meet the disclosure requirements outlined in Senate Bill 1421 and Senate
Bill 16, such as incidents involving the use of deadly force, sustained findings of
dishonesty, sexual misconduct, or discrimination, may be released to the public.
During the August 20, 2025, meeting, Lieutenant Eberle provided the second-quarter
complaint data. Nine complaints were received during the second quarter, eight of which
were cleared with a disposition of exonerated, and one complaint was cleared with a
disposition of unfounded. No additional information related to these complaints is subject
14
to public disclosure under California Penal Code §832.7, which protects the confidentiality
of peace officer personnel records and related investigative materials not specifically
authorized for release under state law. Only records that meet the disclosure
requirements outlined in Senate Bill 1421 and Senate Bill 16, such as incidents involving
the use of deadly force, sustained findings of dishonesty, sexual misconduct, or
discrimination, may be released to the public.
During the October 15, 2025, meeting, Lieutenant Eberle presented the third quarter
complaint data. He reported that, year to date, the Department has received fifteen
complaints, with one complaint currently under investigation. Of the complaints that have
been completed, none have resulted in a sustained finding. No additional information
related to these complaints is subject to public disclosure under California Penal Code
§832.7, which protects the confidentiality of peace officer personnel records and related
investigative materials not specifically authorized for release under state law. Only
records that meet the disclosure requirements outlined in Senate Bill 1421 and Senate
Bill 16, such as incidents involving the use of deadly force, sustained findings of
dishonesty, sexual misconduct, or discrimination, may be released to the public.
2025 Annual Complaint Data-pending end-of-year data.
WORKING GROUPS
In 2025, the PAAC established two working groups, one focused on the topic of Youth
and Policing and the other focused on the topic of the Racial Identity and Profiling Act
(RIPA). The Youth and Policing Working group included Member Alm and Youth Member
Alvarez. The RIPA working group included Chair Tokolahi, Vice Chair Davidi, and
Member Kamena.
The topic of Youth and Policing was presented at the September 18, 2024, PAAC
meeting. Following the presentation and discussion, several members of the Committee
recommended dedicating additional time to this subject and revisiting it in future meetings.
As a result, Youth and Policing was selected as a priority topic during the January 11,
2025, Workplan Special Meeting.
At the March 19, 2025, meeting, the formation of the Youth and Policing Working Group
was announced. Chair Tokolahi shared that Members Alm and Youth Member Alvarez
were selected to attend youth listening sessions on this topic, coordinated in partnership
with Youth Transforming Justice, to observe and provide feedback to the PAAC.
Member Alm provided the following progress report on behalf of the working group:
On May 14, 2025, Members Alvarez and Alm met with the Marin County Youth
Commission to hold a roundtable discussion about youth experiences with police officers
in the community.
A range of perspectives was shared, including both positive and negative interactions.
Some youth described school resource officers as intimidating, both on campus and in
the community, while others expressed that a visible police presence on school grounds
could enhance their sense of safety. Several participants noted that increased
15
opportunities to engage with officers at community events would help foster more positive
and trusting relationships.
Member Alm is collaborating with Youth Transforming Justice to design a joint study
focused on youth perspectives and policing in San Rafael. The study commenced on
November 11, 2025. Additional progress reports from this working group will be available
in 2026.
Youth Member Alvarez’s term concluded in October 2025. Subsequently, Kennedy Rodas
was appointed as the new youth member of the PAAC in November of 2025, with the
expectation that they would continue the initiatives begun by the outgoing youth member.
A RIPA working group was initiated by Chair Tokolahi at the request of Member Kamena
following the May 21, 2025, PAAC meeting in response to Committee discussions
regarding racial disparities in traffic stops and the motion to explore a pilot program
addressing “pretext stops.” Member Kamena requested the formation of a working group
due to concerns that the approved motion lacked clarity and had further questions about
the data presented. While there was general agreement on the importance of examining
the data, there were differing perspectives on how administrative or equipment violations
should be categorized and whether all such stops should be considered “pretextual.”
Chair Tokolahi announced the formation of the RIPA working group at the June 18, 2025,
PAAC meeting. The working group met on three occasions: July 28, September 4, and
October 9, 2025. The RIPA working group conducted a thorough review to examine
potential policy changes and their implications.
The establishment of the working group was suggested to enable a thorough examination
of these matters in partnership with staff. The goal was to facilitate the provision of
additional data, address inquiries, and coordinate meetings. The objective of the working
group was to gain a deeper understanding of the differences between safety-related and
ministerial violations, evaluate how these types of stops are documented and charged,
and identify possible factors contributing to disparities in stop data.
The RIPA working group requested that staff gather more information and provide context
to clarify these processes, ensuring that future recommendations consider both legal and
operational factors.
1. Meetings and Collaborative Discussions – The group convened on July 28, 2025,
September 4, 2025, and October 9, 2025, to assess current practices and establish
priorities.
2. Agency Collaboration – A focused meeting and information exchange were held
with Mill Valley Police Department Chief Navarro to gain insights into the
approaches of neighboring agencies.
3. Data Review and Analysis – The group analyzed traffic stop and DUI data from the
SRPD for 2025, reviewed the 2024 RIPA report, and the data provided by
MVFREE to identify patterns, trends, and potential areas of disparity.
4. Comparative Research – The working group reviewed the Pennsylvania State
Police Traffic Stop Study, focusing on traffic stop data to better understand
16
benchmarking practices and the application of census data for demographic
comparisons.
5. Investigative Inquiries – The working group posed a series of probing questions
intended to better understand the operational, legal, and community impacts of
potential policy changes. These questions focused on:
• The role of officer discretion in determining when and how traffic stops are
conducted.
• Frequently cited administrative and mechanical violations, and whether these
correlate with safety outcomes.
• Accident and DUI statistics, and how these might be affected by changes to
enforcement practices.
• The implementation and results of similar policies in other jurisdictions, including
lessons learned.
• The relationship between discretionary enforcement, racial disparities, and public
perception of fairness.
The working group discussed the challenges and potential implications of directing law
enforcement to enforce some laws while disregarding others, noting that such an
approach could place officers in a difficult and uncertain position when carrying out their
duties. Key points from the discussion included:
• If community members wish to see changes in how certain state laws are enforced,
the appropriate course of action would be to petition state legislators to amend
those laws.
• Concerns were raised about the practicality of mailing citations for unregistered
vehicles, including whether such notices would reach the correct recipients and
how this compares to the rate of ignored annual DMV renewal notices.
• The discussion also acknowledged that racial or economic factors may contribute
to vehicle registration challenges. It was suggested that community advocates or
organizations might explore ways to provide financial assistance or fundraising
efforts to help individuals cover registration fees.
The working group presented their work and findings during the October 15, 2025, PAAC
meeting. In response to the recommendations made at the May 21, 2025, PAAC meeting,
the working group provided the following updates:
Recommendation 1: SRPD adopt a Bias by Proxy policy.
The working group was pleased to report that SRPD has implemented this
recommendation, and a Bias by Proxy4 policy is now in place.
4 SRPD Policy 401 Bias-Based Policing RELEASE_20250922_T173205_SanRafaelPDPolicyManual.pdf
17
Recommendation 2: Adopt a one-year pilot program eliminating pretext
stops.
After careful review and discussion, the working group decided not to recommend
implementing a policy to eliminate pretext stops. While the members
acknowledged the importance of addressing potential disparities in traffic stop
outcomes, they concluded that removing pretext stops might lead to unintended
consequences that could compromise the safety of the San Rafael community.
The working group noted that proactive enforcement efforts, including certain types
of traffic stops, can play a critical role in reducing crime and maintaining safety in
the community. The working group recognized the need to balance fair and
equitable policing with the responsibility to protect the community from individuals
engaged in criminal activity.
Recommendation 3: Use a performance metric to monitor the progress on
recommended RIPA strategies.
Rather than adopting a pretext stop elimination policy at this time, the working
group recommends continued evaluation of traffic stop data and related outcomes
to identify potential disparities and areas for improvement. The working group
further supports ongoing collaboration with SRPD to enhance officer training on
bias awareness, decision-making, and community engagement. These combined
efforts aim to strengthen equitable policing practices while preserving effective
enforcement strategies that contribute to crime reduction, roadway safety, and the
removal of illegal weapons from the community.
Recommendation 4: Establish an annual RIPA equity assessment.
The working group supports this recommendation and suggested a new working
group to collaborate with staff on the creation and content for an equity dashboard.
Following the October meeting, the Staff Liaisons solicited Committee members'
interest in participating in an Equity Dashboard working group through the Chair.
No formal action was taken by the Committee following the working group update at the
October 15, 2025, meeting. Committee members asked questions, and Member Alm
made several data requests to staff.
TRAINING, DEVELOPMENT, AND CONFERENCES
In 2024, the Committee and staff discussed the possibility of attending an upcoming
National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (NACOLE) conference.
While no formal decision about NACOLE membership was made in 2025, a Regional
NACOLE meeting occurred in August 2025 in San Francisco. Two Committee members
and one staff member attended this two-day meeting.
18
Member Ruiz participated in the SRPD Community Academy. The San Rafael Police
Department offers two Academy sessions during the year; one of the two academies is
taught in Spanish. Member Ruiz participated in the Spanish Community Academy.
Academy classes are held on Wednesday evenings from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. The
Academy is designed to foster an increased understanding of police operations, enhance
awareness of the Police Department’s roles, capabilities, and limitations, and develop
realistic expectations of Department responses. Additionally, it aims to bridge the gap
between the community and the Police Department by building trust, respect, and a sense
of cooperation. The program provides a forum for meaningful police-citizen exchange and
dialogue.
The Community Police Academy provides community members with an inside look at
local law enforcement. During academy training, students are introduced to a wide range
of topics. The academy course is designed to provide residents with an overview of the
Police Department’s function and operational procedures. During the Academy, students
have an opportunity to ride in a marked patrol car and ride on the patrol boat.
Academy classes are taught by civilian and sworn police personnel of the San Rafael
Police Department. Participants meet the Chief of Police and many members of the
Department.
ORAL BOARD P ARTICIPATION
The SRPD has made significant improvements to its hiring practices by including a
member of the PAAC on the Oral Board Panel for SRPD recruitments for both sworn and
non-sworn vacancies. PAAC members have participated in five different Oral Board
Panels for the positions of Police Officer, Police Recruit, Records Specialist, and Police
Dispatcher. Additionally, committee members took part in two promotional panels for
internal sworn staff members. This change demonstrates the department's commitment
to enhancing community involvement, transparency, and accountability in the selection
of its officers. By inviting a PAAC member to participate, the department ensures that
diverse perspectives are incorporated into the hiring process, fostering a stronger
connection between the police force and the community it serves.
The Oral Board process is a critical component of the initial hiring phase. Candidates
undergo a structured interview in which a panel, now including a PAAC representative,
assesses their qualifications, communication skills, problem-solving abilities, and
suitability for the role of a police officer or cadet. This evaluation is designed to determine
how well applicants align with the department’s values and its mission of community-
oriented policing. The inclusion of a PAAC member enhances the objectivity and
thoroughness of this process, ensuring that successful candidates not only possess the
necessary skills but also reflect the values of integrity, service, and community
partnership.
Ride Along Participation
Committee members participated in ride-alongs with officers throughout the year. Each
member completed at least one ride-along, during which they observed patrol procedures
19
and community interactions firsthand. These experiences provided valuable insights into
the day-to-day operations of the SRPD and helped members better understand the
challenges and complexities of maintaining public safety. By engaging directly with
officers, committee members were able to see the practical application of the
department's policies and the significance of community-oriented policing. This
experience also allowed them to build relationships with law enforcement personnel,
helping to bridge the gap between the police and the communities they serve. Their
involvement in these activities highlights the committee's commitment to transparency,
accountability, and collaborative community engagement.
Community Events
Throughout the year, Committee members also engage in various community events,
meetings, and discussions. Committee members share their outreach efforts during the
Committee Reports portion of each PAAC meeting. Below is a partial list of events
attended in 2025.
National Night Out Canal Community Fair Porchfest
West End Traffic Safety
Meeting
1st Baptist Church Black
History Month Celebration
Sun Valley Neighborhood
Association Meeting
Canal Community Fair Human Trafficking
Awareness Forum
San Rafael City Schools
Board Meeting
25th Anniversary
Celebration of the Jeanette
Prandi Center
County Community Land
Trust Initiative Meeting City Council Meetings
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND FUTURE GOALS
The 2025 Annual Report emphasizes the PAAC's ongoing commitment to building trust,
transparency, and collaboration between the San Rafael community and its Police
Department. This report details the Committee's successes in creating comprehensive
work plans, organizing engaging training sessions, and developing actionable
recommendations. Each of these efforts aims to enhance community relations and ensure
that policing practices align with the values and needs of the community we serve.
Throughout 2025, the PAAC advanced meaningful initiatives to promote accountability
and deepen community understanding of public safety practices. Through collaborative
discussions, presentations, and focused research, the Committee has made significant
strides toward enhancing transparency and building a stronger foundation of mutual trust.
The PAAC is committed to evolving policing in San Rafael with community partnership.
We urge residents, business owners, and organizations to stay engaged in this dialogue
to help create a safer, more inclusive, and equitable city. Collaboration and commitment
will drive meaningful progress and ensure our Police Department reflects the community.
20
The PAAC appreciates the ongoing partnership of the San Rafael community, City
leadership, and SRPD staff. In January 2026, the Committee will hold a special workshop
to develop its annual work plan and set priorities for the coming year.