Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFin Budget Amendments FY2011-12, Measure SCITY OFr�I%1
Agenda Item No: 5b
Meeting Date: July 2, 2012
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: FINANCE
A '
Prepared by: Mark Moses, City Manager g pproval•
Interim Finance Director
SUBJECT: 1) RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF SAN
RAFAEL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012;
2) RESOLUTION ADOPTING CITY OF SAN RAFAEL BUDGET FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013;
3) RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE MEASURE S COMMITTEE REPORT
RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT REPORT AND ADOPT RESOLUTIONS AS
PRESENTED.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to provide the City Council and community with
the proposed city-wide budget for fiscal year 2012-2013 which has been prepared for adoption,
and to present other steps necessary to support this action and to complete the oversight and
management of the budget for fiscal year 2011-2012.
The budget is both a spending plan for the City's available financial resources and the legal
authority for City departments to spend these resources for public purposes. Through these
resources, services are provided to meet the needs of city residents. The City Council and City
staff respond to the community's needs in part through the budget which is intended to balance
not only revenues and costs, but also community priorities.
The City Council conducted a mid -year budget review on March 5, 2012. For the first time in
past few years, the City was not forced to make mid -year cuts in response to declining revenues.
A combination of layoffs, furloughs, deferral of capital maintenance and equipment replacement,
freezing and reducing compensation, and changing service hours have been necessary to
successfully work within the available resources. Although the general fund balance was stable
during fiscal year 2010-2011, a combination of borrowed funds and use of other reserves was
required to achieve this stability. Fiscal year 2011-2012 marks the first year in over a decade in
which the City has not relied on reserves or borrowing to fund its general fund operations.
Although this represents significant progress, the continued deferral of capital and maintenance
is not a sustainable budget -balancing strategy.
`` u1
FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
File No.:
Council Meeting
Disposition:
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 2
The City Council held budget workshops on April 2, April 16, and May 14, 2012. The purpose
of the workshops was to review the City's three-year forecast, and to discuss program priorities
and key fiscal policies that should shape the development of the fiscal year 2012-2013 budget.
One significant outcome is that staff was directed to prepare the preliminary general fund budget
without resorting to the use of reserves or borrowed funds to balance the budget. In addition, a
high priority was placed on fully funding actuarially required contributions to employee benefits.
A number of potential programs that could be reduced or eliminated to preserve resources were
also discussed.
During the City Council meetings of June 4 and June 18, 2012, a preliminary general fund deficit
of $1,062,000 was resolved through a combination of ongoing service reductions, staffing
adjustments, one-time expenditure reductions, and newly identified revenues and vacancy
savings. The service level impacts of the operational reductions were identified and discussed at
these meetings.
Prior to fiscal year 2004-2005, the City faced a serious structural budget deficit. In November
2005, the citizens of San Rafael approved a 0.5 percent transactions and use tax. The
transactions and use tax (Measure S funds) has provided mitigation to the City's loss of key
general fund revenues. As part of the requirements of the ordinance, an independent citizens'
oversight committee was created to review and report on the collection and expenditure of tax
revenues. This Committee, the Measure S Oversight Committee, established baseline policies for
their oversight role. The Committee met on June 21st to discuss the proposed fiscal year 2012-
2013 budget. The result of the Committee's review is included in this report.
In summary, this report will focus on the following key areas.
1. Amendments to the budget for fiscal year 2011-2012
2. Proposed, balanced budget for all City funds for fiscal year 2012-2013
4. Report by Measure S Oversight Committee regarding proposed general fund budget
ANALYSIS:
FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 AMENDJUENTS:
As part of adopting the 2011-2012 budget, and projecting ending balances, staff requests City
Council consideration of an amendment to the fiscal year 2011-2012 budget.
On May 7, 2012, the City Council unanimously passed a pension reform resolution that included
policy direction that emphasizes fiscal control of pension and other post -employment benefits,
and prudent and sustainable mechanisms for properly funding these benefits. In the budget study
session that followed, City Council directed staff to dedicate available current year revenues to
fully fund retirement benefits as determined actuarially, without the use of reserves or borrowed
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 3
funds. For the past several years, the City has withdrawn $1 million annually from a retiree
health reserve account to partially fund retiree health premiums.
The unappropriated, projected actual revenues for fiscal year 2011-2012, coupled with unused,
authorized general fund expenditures are available to fund current employee and retiree benefit
obligations. General Fund Revenues, previously budgeted at $53.5 million, are now projected to
reach $54.7 million. In order to avoid the use of reserves, an additional $994K is projected to be
used to fund the benefit obligations. The actual amounts will be determined and recorded in the
course of preparing the year-end financial statements.
Projected changes to general fund revenues and expenditures — fiscal year 2011-2012
(excerpted from Attachment A - Exhibit I of the corresponding resolution):
General Fund
Adopted
Budget
FY2011-12
Budget as
revised at
Mid -Year
Projected
Changes
Revised
Projection for
FY2011-12
Revenues
52,984,800
53,474,404
1,215,000
54,689,404
Transfers in
2,490,940
1,726,692
(200,000)
1,526,692
Total Sources
55,474,940
55,201,096
1,015,000
56,216,096
Expenditures
53,200,530
53,420,497
993,865
54,414,362
Transfers out
1,763,250
1,769,750
21,135
1,790,885
Total Uses
54,963,780
55,190,247
1,015,000
56,205,247
Net Results
1 511,960 1
10,849 1
0 1
10,849
An additional appropriation of $14,086 is required in the Safety Grant fund, in order to match
resources provided from a federal grant. This appropriation was offset by an equivalent
reduction to general fund appropriations.
FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 CITY-WIDE BUDGET:
HIGHLIGHTS
❖ Overall FY2012-2013 City Budget: The total proposed FY2012-2013 budget for the
City is estimated to be $88,091,158. This sum reflects all funds and operations for the
City, inclusive of appropriations of new resources for one time and capital projects in the
amount of $8,395,922. These appropriations are supported by FY2012-2013 revenue
projected at $88,016,257, as well as by funds retained from previous periods for capital
projects.
• General Fund Ending Balance as of June 30, 2012: Staff projects that the General
Fund's FY2011-2012 actual revenues will fully support 2011-2012 expenditures,
resulting in a June 30, 2012 ending balance at the same level as the prior year, i.e.
approximately $6.8 million. Of this amount, $1.4 million continues to be set aside in the
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 4
emergency reserve. Although the general fund did not add to this reserve, other important
reserves were enhanced during the year.
❖ General Fund Budget: The General Fund portion of the City budget is balanced in that
FY2012-2013 appropriations, totaling $57,584,939, are fully supported by FY2012-2013
General Fund revenues and transfers, projected at $57,605,213 (see Attachment B -
Exhibit I and Exhibit 11). Employee retirement obligations are fully -funded, without using
other reserve sources, as has been done for the several years leading up to FY2011-2012.
The stable general fund balances of the past two years, coupled with a budget that does
not rely on reserves or borrowings, represents a significant accomplishment for the City.
This paved the way for the AA rating recently received from Fitch on the parking
refunding bonds that will be sold next month in order to reduce debt service for the
parking fund.
❖ State Budget Impacts: As this staff report is being prepared, the State does not have a
final budget, and continues to struggle with an unprecedented fiscal and political crisis.
While the most recent budget proposals do not include provisions with direct revenue or
expenditure impacts to our city, there are likely to be direct or indirect effects as the State
will be forced into significant additional cuts should revenue again fail to meet
projections. One of the sources of State revenue projected for fiscal year 2012 — 2013 is
new revenue based firmly on the success of the Governor's tax proposal.
Revenue Trends and Assumptions:
The major source of funds required to pay for all of the services provided to the community
continues to be taxes. Major tax trends for the upcoming year are highlighted as follows:
Sales Tax:
Sales tax trends have been strong, with the potential to exceed 5% for fiscal year 2011-2012.
With the assistance of HdL Consultants, sales tax is estimated to increase by 4.7% to $17.0
million in fiscal year 2012-2013. This increase is supported by the projected opening of the
Target store in spring 2013. Sales taxes account for 30% of general fund revenues.
Property Tax:
The City's second largest tax generator is property tax. While the City did not experience the
level of property value declines seen in other areas of the state, revenues have stagnated for the
past several years. Accordingly, our projections are relatively flat, accommodating a small
decrease in recognition of recent drops in commercial property, prompted by commercial
vacancies. For fiscal year 2012-2013, there is an estimated $13.9 million in property tax
revenues.
Transaction & Use Tax (pleasure S).-
This
):This voter -approved, transaction and use tax took effect in April 2006. Its purpose is to maintain
essential City services. Revenues from this tax are projected to increase 4% to $6.5 million in
fiscal year 2012-2013. This figure is remains below the peak of over $7 million collected in
fiscal year 2007-2008.
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Pale: 5
Other General Fund Revenues:
Other revenues are expected to experience flat to moderate growth over the next year.
Other notable revenue activities are presented below:
✓ Paramedic Tax: The proposed $6 million annual cost of Emergency Medical Services for
fiscal year 2012-2013 will not require an increase for San Rafael taxpayers who pay $89
per residential living unit and $.12 per square foot for non-residential buildings. On May
7, 2012, Council approved increases for CSA #13 and CSA #19, whose recently passed
measure provided authority for those service areas to be brought in parity with San Rafael
residents. The other area served, Marinwood CFD, is currently considering a measure
that would provide for a similar rate change. In the meantime, their rates remain at the tax
rate cap of $85 per residential living unit and $0.11 per non-residential building square
footage for fiscal year 2012-2013.
✓ Library Assessment Tax — In June 2010, the citizens of San Rafael passed Measure C.
This assessment is projected to provide $886,500 in revenues to support the Library.
Funds have been dedicated to library hours, equipment, materials, services for children,
teens and adults, and to a capital reserve fund to which $105,000 will be added to the
current balance of $495;000. On June 18, 2012, City Council conducted a study session
to review the fiscal status of the Measure C fund and acknowledged the trade off between
dedicating resources to operational hours and capital reserves. The library director will
return later in the year with long-term, strategic recommendations that will address the
library department organization, public hours, service delivery and facilities.
The City continues to maintain general fund support for the library at or above the fiscal
year 2009-2010 baseline of 4.38%, and has not required the library to make
disproportionate cuts when expenditure reductions have been necessary to balance the
budget.
Expenditure Trends and Assumptions:
The City-wide budget proposal includes total appropriations of $88.1 million for fiscal year
2012-2013.
The major expense driver of the operating expenses is the increase in pension rates, which
translates into an 8% increase, or approximately $1.4 million for the general fund and $1.7
million for all funds. The compensation -related concessions that were agreed to in mid -2011 for
fiscal years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 have served to stabilize the largest operating expense,
salary costs, across all funds. Similarly, non -personnel related operating expenditures are
projected to remain fairly flat across the funds.
Another major change is in the internal charges for retiree medical premiums. Fiscal year 2012-
2013 is the first year in which the total actuarially required contribution is fully funded in the
proposed budget. When compared to prior year adopted budgets, this will translate into a
significant increase in benefit costs. In fact, it represents a more complete reflection of the total
cost of these benefits, and provides for a more fiscally sound, and less expensive funding
mechanism.
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT 1 Page: 6
In order to fully fund the retiree benefits, it was necessary to implement $750,000 of expenditure
reductions, from the preliminary general fund budget. Operationally, these cuts will be reflected
in the following areas:
1. Reduced childcare services - ongoing
2. Reduced maintenance of small parks (parquettes) — ongoing
3. Reduced resources in planning and, potentially, in administrative and program support.
In addition, there were some one-time cuts to vehicle and equipment replacement that cannot be
sustained in future years. These one-time, expenditure reduction strategies represent
approximately 0.5% of the general fund operating budget. Similarly, there are no significant one-
time revenue sources (i.e., no use of reserves or borrowed funds) to support the planned
expenditures.
Capital Improvement Program:
In July 2012, Public Works staff presented a comprehensive 5 -year Capital Improvement Project
(CIP) list. This document identified projects that impact all segments of San Rafael's
infrastructure, including but not limited to City -maintained roads, pedestrian and bicyclist
facilities, traffic control networks, drainage systems, buildings, parks, parking facilities, etc. In a
separate staff report, Public Works is providing an update that will focus on planned CIP activity
for fiscal year 2012-2013.
Enterprise activity (Parking Services):
The Parking Services fund has remained fairly stable operationally, primarily as a result of
reducing personnel -related expenses. Parking meter rates were last increased in 2007. The
parking structures and lots have deferred maintenance issues that will need to be addressed over
the next few years, in order to preserve these revenue -generating assets. The appropriations for
this fund total $4.7 million.
Fund Balances and Reserves:
Final review of the funds for the fiscal year 2011-2012 revealed that the overall health of the
funds is sound. The appropriations and estimated revenues established in the proposed budget
project that all funds will have a positive fund balance status as of June 30, 2012. Emergency
reserves in the General Fund balance as of June 30, 2012 remain at $1.4 million (2.5% of current
year appropriations). Although this is below the 10% target, the City has preserved $3.0 million
in the pension reserve fund and has re-established adequate balances in the internal service funds
that support retiree medical, leave payouts, workers compensation and general liability.
City-wide Summary:
The City's General Fund accounts for most of the major services to residents and businesses
(such as police, fire suppression and prevention,planning, building, library, parks, streets,
engineering, traffic enforcement and management, cultural programs). The General Fund
appropriation for fiscal year 2012-2013 is approximately $57.6 million. The following table
summarizes the appropriations found in Attachment B — Exhibit I, which provides the schedule
of consolidated fund activities for fiscal year 2012-2013.
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 7
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
vroaosea rsuaaet Aoorooriations
General Fund $57,584,939
Special Revenue and Grant Funds 25,481,486
Enterprise Fund (Parking Services 4,716,861
Internal Service & Capital Replacement 10,992,920
Misc. Capital Project Funds 2,318,581
Adjustment for ISF Charges & Transfers 13,003,629
Total City-wide Appropriations $88,091,158
Organizational Capacity:
As discussed during prior budget presentations; while the City has achieved significant progress
by balancing the general fund budget without the use of borrowed monies or reserves, the budget
continues to rely on unsustainable withholding of resources that need to be addressed over the
next few years:
1. Capital and maintenance budgets have been deferred for several years. This practice has
severely limited funding for facility maintenance, repairs and replacement. City -owned
buildings and city -operated public facilities, parks and open space risk severe reduction
in their respective values, safety and utility if they are not properly maintained. In
addition, grant funds are at risk, as a result of reductions in project management capacity.
2. The ongoing erosion of staffing levels has reduced the City's organizational capacity.
The proposed budget provides funding for total staffing of 376 at July 1, 2012, and 375
by September 1, 2012, down 70 positions, or 16% from fiscal year 2007-2008 (see
Attachment C — Exhibit III). Currently, there is very little capacity to proactively manage
emerging issues, or to ensure smooth and consistent continuity of services. Although the
reduced workweek from 37.5 to 36 hours for the non -safety personnel has conserved
general fund resources, it has come at a price, in the form of exacerbating the service
delivery and organizational capacity -related challenges caused by the staff reductions of
prior years.
,MEASURE S OVERSIGHT C01I11ITTEE REPORT:
In November 2005, the citizens of San Rafael passed pleasure S with a 70 percent voter
approval. This measure amended the Municipal Code to establish a .50 percent transaction and
use tax within the City of San Rafael. The ordinance also requires the appointment of an
independent citizen's oversight committee to review the collection and expenditure of tax
revenues. Since April 2006, the Measure S Oversight Committee has maintained oversight by
establishing a baseline policy and guideline.
The Committee met on June 21, 2012 to review the proposed General Fund expenditures for
fiscal year 2011-2012. The Committee's written report, dated June 25, 2012, is included in this
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT I Paye: 8
staff report as Attachment C — Exhibit I. The Committee found that the City is spending Measure
S revenues in a manner that is consistent with the provisions Transaction and Use Tax
Ordinance. However, due to the sub -par performance of General Fund revenues since Measure S
was passed, it has not been possible to maintain the funding of some essential service levels at
the inflation-adjusted service levels of the 2005-2006 base year. The Committee also observed
that the recent general fund revenue performance represents a partial recovery, relative to the
inflation-adjusted baseline.
FISCAL IMPACT:
By approving the Resolutions as presented, the Council is authorizing the levels of expenditures,
within funds, for the 2012-2013 fiscal year. The proposed budgets reflect all assumptions
outlined and incorporate direction received from the Council through the June 18th meeting.
The 2012-2013 Budget Resolution also provides for the "roll over" of unspent capital project
funds from 2011-2012 for projects that were not completed by June 30, 2012. Capital project
spending occurs each year by appropriating accumulated funds (e.g., gas tax, traffic mitigation,
etc.), in addition to new revenue sources. By carrying over the unspent portion of a project's
budget into the subsequent year, capital project budget performance is easier to track, because
the same budget authority is not duplicated for unspent funds. This also makes it easier to match
budgeted costs with actual expenditures.
Similarly, the Budget Resolution provides for the "roll over" of active purchase orders (estimated
at $175,000) that have not been completed by year-end. This provides for operational continuity
and avoids having to re -budget expenditures that were previously budgeted and authorized.
The City Council can choose to either:
1) Accept the reports, recommendations and Resolutions as presented; or
2) Make modifications to the recommendations, which would result in a change in the total
revenue forecasts or appropriations.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council accept the report and adopt the Resolutions as presented.
A - RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012
B - RESOLUTION ADOPTING CITY OF SAN RAFAEL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR
2012-2013
C - RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE MEASURE S COMMITTEE REPORT
W:\Management Services- lvorkFile=,Finance- fvorkFiletCouncil MateriakStaffReportsl2012\City l2-13 city budge€.doe
RESOLUTION NO. 13381
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL BUDGET
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVISING THE FINAL
FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 BUDGET
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution 13192 adopting the fiscal year
2011-2012 budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution 13305 amending the fiscal
year 2011-2012 budget; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of this Council to review recommendations from
staff regarding the City's financial condition, including revenue projections and available
resources and provide funding for various ongoing, capital and other service needs; and
WHEREAS, the Council has provided direction to staff to dedicate current year
revenues to fully fund retirement benefits as determined actuarially, and the City
Manager has submitted to the City Council a report outlining how this direction can be
incorporated into the fiscal year 2011-2012 budget; and
WHEREAS, after examination, deliberation and due consideration, the City
Council has approved the same report and recommendations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the San Rafael City Council that
Resolution 13192 for fiscal year 2011-2012 is further amended to adjust general fund
revenues to an estimated $54,689,404 per attached Exhibit I for the purpose of
appropriating those revenues as well as unused authorized general fund expenditures
for the purpose of funding employee and retiree benefit obligations, with the actual
amounts to be determined in the course of preparation of the fiscal year-end financial
audit and reported in the year-end audited financial statements.
1, ESTHER C. BEIRNE, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting of the Council of said City on Monday, the 2nd of July 2012, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Connolly, Levine, McCullough & Mayor Phillips
ABSENT: COLINCILMEMBERS.- Heller
ESTHER C. BEIRNE, City Clerk
WAManagement Services- WorkFile\Finance- WorkFile\Council Material\Resolutions\2012\City\Amend City budget
11-12.doc
Budget Summary - Fiscal Year 2011-2012
General Fund Recap.
Total
Operating
Capital
Revenues
Revenues
Transfers In
Sources
Expenditures
Expenditures
Transfers Out
Total Uses
Adopted Budget
55,475,740
53.200,530
1,763,250
54.963.780
GF at mid -year
53,474,404
1,726.692
General Fund
52,984,800
2,490,940
55,475,740
53,200,530
-
1,763,250
54,963,780
Special Revenue & Grant Funds
23,125,240
1,578,830
24,704,070
18,800,820
4,252,070
1,087,980
24,140,870
Debt Service Funds
228,860
228,860
147,460
147,460
Capital Project Funds
2,530
2,530
12,960
75,920
88,880
Enterprise (Parking)
4,150,010
4,150,010
3,929,590
175,000
457,960
4,562,550
Internal Service Funds
7,956,210
606,520
8,562,730
7,819,210
100,000
1,367,100
9,286,310
Capital Replacement Funds
2,102,700
2,102,700
2,046,590
-
2,046,590
Trust & Agency Funds
39,460
39,460
39,580
-
39,580
Combined Fund Totals
90,589,810
4,676,290
95,266,100
85,996,740
4,602,990
4,676,290
95,276,020
Less Interfund Transfers
(4,676,290)
(4,676,290)
(4,676,290)
(4,676,290)
Less Internal Service Charges
(8,168,020)
(8,168,020)
(8,168,020)
(8,168,020)
Net Totals FY 2011-2012
$ 82,421,790
$
$82,421,790
$ 77,828,720
$ 4,602,990
$ $
82,431,710
Up to and including Mid -Year
General Fund
489,604
(764,248)
(274,644)
219,967
6,500
226,467
Special Revenue & Grant Funds
-
6,500
6,500
(60,000)
(60,000)
Debt Service Funds
-
Capital Project Funds
Enterprise (Parking)
Internal Service Funds
(800,000)
(800,000)
Capital Replacement Funds
-
Trust & Agency Funds
95,752
95,752
Combined Fund Totals
489,604
(757,748)
(268,144)
219,967
-
(757,748)
(537,781)
Less Interfund Transfers
757,748
(261,644)
757,748
757,748
Less Internal Service Charges
-
-
Mid -Year Net Totals FY 2011-2012
$ 82,911,394
$
$81,892,002
$ 78,048,687
$ 4,602,990
$ $
82,651,677
Proiected Actual
General Fund
1,215,000
(200,000)
1,015,000
993,865
21,135
1,015,000
Special Revenue & Grant Funds
14,086
21,135
35,220
14,086
14,086
Debt Service Funds
Capital Project Funds
210,092
210,092
Enterprise (Parking)
Internal Service Funds
1,743,865
1,743,865
(200,000)
(200,000)
Capital Replacement Funds
Trust & Agency Funds
Combined Fund Totals
3,183,043
(178,865)
3,004,178
1,007,951
-
(178,865)
829,086
Less Interfund Transfers
-
178,865
178,865
-
178,865
178,865
Less Internal Service Charges
(1,743,865)
(1,743,865)
(1,007,951)
(1,007,951)
Projected Net Totals FY 2011-2012
$ 84,350,572
$
$83,331,180
$ 78,048.687
$ 4,602,990
$ $
82,651,677
General Fund Recap.
Revenues
Transfers in
Sources
Expenditures
Transfers out
Uses
GF as adopted
52,984,800
2,490,940
55,475,740
53.200,530
1,763,250
54.963.780
GF at mid -year
53,474,404
1,726.692
55,201,096
53,420,497
1.769,750
55,190,247
GF projected ear -end
54,689,404
1,526.692
56,216.096
54,414,362
1,790,885
56,205,247
RESOLUTION NO. 13382
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
APPROVING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 AND
PROVIDING FOR THE APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURE OF ALL
SUMS SET FORTH IN SAID BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $88,091,158.
WHEREAS, the City Manager has submitted to the San Rafael City Council a
Preliminary Budget for the fiscal year July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held public meetings on budget development,
operational priorities, multi-year financial projections, and preliminary and proposed budgets
for fiscal year 2012-2013, on April 2, April 16, May 14, June 4, and June 18, where all
interested persons were heard; and
WHEREAS, after examination, deliberation and due consideration of the
preliminary and proposed budgets, the San Rafael City Council has provided direction to the
City Manager; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of this Council to adopt said Proposed Budget
submitted by the City Manager as modified and amended by the Council as the approved
budget for the fiscal year 2012 - 2013; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of this Council to carry forward unspent capital
projects resources funded in fiscal year 2011 - 2012 to complete the balance of these projects
in the 2012 - 2013 fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of this Council to carry forward unspent operational
funds from fiscal year 2011-2012 encumbered through approved, active purchase orders to
complete the balance of these purchases in the 2012 - 2013 fiscal year;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the San Rafael City Council that
1. The proposed one-year budget for the City of San Rafael for the fiscal year July 1, 2012
through June 30, 2013, is hereby adopted as amended, totaling appropriations in the sum
of $88,091,158 of which $79,634,754 is the Operating Budget and $8,395,922 is the Capital
and Special Projects Budget, as presented in Exhibits I and II.
2. The sums of money therein set forth are hereby appropriated from the revenues of the City
to the departments, functions, programs and funds therein set forth for expenditure during
the fiscal year 2012 - 2013.
3. The budget provides funding for a total of 376.24 full-time equivalent, authorized positions
as presented in Exhibit 111.
4. The City of San Rafael will carry forward unspent operational funds from fiscal year 2011-
2012
011-
2012 encumbered through approved, active purchase orders, and reappropriate these
funds in fiscal year 2012 — 2013 to be used solely to pay for the remaining portion of City
Council authorized expenditures in the originating funds.
5. The City of San Rafael will carry forward unspent capital project funds from fiscal year 2011
- 2012 and reappropriate these funds in fiscal year 2012 - 2013 to be used solely to pay for
the remaining portion of City Council authorized expenditures for street, facility, storm drain,
traffic mitigation, park and other long term capital projects started in the 2011 - 2012 or prior
fiscal years.
1, ESTHER C. BEIRNE, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Council of said City on Monday, the 2nd day of July 2012, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Connolly, Levine, McCullough & Mayor Phillips
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Heller
ESTHER C. BEIRNE, City Clerk
h Cl) Cl) (D 0 IT T 0 (N (D
r - a) (D 0 r r- �O
, (OloDl
�T ol�ql
o
0 M M (0
'0 C\1
0 (1) m "
�t
'T
oo m
CO
0 00 AT — 0 N M a,
T N
lo
LL
F -
z
W cl� T� \� lll� M
m
(q (o�
N
<
LQ tc� Cj (D
M(D-
-'r
'4 K3 "t
Coco
U,
0)
cn
N m m CO w h )0
N to r�:
N
o
co c)
-
q (D co c\l to
'n
m N (D
oo
co N
o 05
co
t -
m co Fl- o r (0 cD V clj to
to I- O h Ln N
o co I--
-ql co
co
co
r 'o to
o rl-
to c� a)
6n, oo oo
V�
C,
61),
v5�
(D O
N
C4
to
aE) 0
Uu
3:
> 0
p 0 !E m (D 0 m 2 2
w)
64
W
6% 61)
H3
t-:
06
<1 < < IL
U)i
21
60 ta
oD
m 11 Ini
< 74 7,
CN 'T C, ff
- ON
ml
la
cli cli CN N (\I N cli N " N cli C'I 12� " C'I
'C' C,
Cl)
wi
VH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16F�
LnwooltomN00000
M �: m w Nm V Ln o
(o Qo o MM o
�T 0
(2 00 0 co 0 Nr- 12
- m - 'It LO - rl� cl� cl�
r "t CO LO Cl) , (NJ
0 C14
r,,,I
� QD o cq -! M L,) C� 04
to O o (D r- N (D Cl) c\j LO � ('A —
t0 r c\l (q M LO
per. r to cl) (o M (N
Ln
61�
to oo o o o oo o o o o o o o Q C) c)
T o a)
o m
W5 C, co
00 0 oo
001 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 C\l 0 0 0 �?0 00
O 'r o
cl, - - r-� lo (D ll*' �cl� Lo - C� c\i .h
O OO ID Nm 04 LO r- N
0 (D c\i (1) c2 a) o Noo N It , - m ul
tp to m (D N — 04
Ooo (D 10 N CO Im c\l IQ m 'IT LO
m Lo r- m oo n 0 1- oD r- LO o c\j
m "T r- " "T w c\l N "T w
M E9 69 L,) Lr) eq
61i W� 6.) Gq 611 to
0 0 (D (0
0 o
o
0 0 ID w
to a 0 0 0
W
0 0 m
Cl)
00 (D a 0 0 0 0
rl-
LL
F -
z
w
M
m h 60 m 0 LoM q 0H3 Q). 0 a 'u,
Iq Iq �� C� ll�- llt� to C�
<
60, u-) w m
q to (7�
g to 6-, 6-,O
Cr a�
-'r
'4 K3 "t
-,;r
v) 69, m w to6a m to
0)
w
0 0 0 o (D
CD
-
tl- oD 04 rl> 0 04 0 ell
m
cr> r- to
tD
U2 LL
06
F, - <
> > co
O
>
LU
0
�2
(o oo
*o
N w
"IL lc� to
CL C:
to c� a)
6n, oo oo
V�
C,
61),
v5�
(D u)
cq cli
(0
aE) 0
Uu
3:
> 0
p 0 !E m (D 0 m 2 2
w)
Lo cl) u) cl) C14 tq
kFl ke v�l Gq 61�1
ui
LL!
6% 61)
0
to,
<1
<1 < < IL
U)i
21
60 ta
oD
m 11 Ini
< 74 7,
CN 'T C, ff
- ON
ml
la
cli cli CN N (\I N cli N " N cli C'I 12� " C'I
'C' C,
Cl)
wi
oo
o0occoccoccoo coo
occo
o 'D o
o (D -)
o
o c, c, o o c:) o o c,
c)
c:,
a
cl�
o c, c, c, o
o o N C) LO
6q
Ga
�o
vil
Eq
0
P
oo
H
o co o C) r-
m
t
04
�T o (D N
N
O
VH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16F�
LnwooltomN00000
M �: m w Nm V Ln o
(o Qo o MM o
�T 0
(2 00 0 co 0 Nr- 12
- m - 'It LO - rl� cl� cl�
r "t CO LO Cl) , (NJ
0 C14
r,,,I
� QD o cq -! M L,) C� 04
to O o (D r- N (D Cl) c\j LO � ('A —
t0 r c\l (q M LO
per. r to cl) (o M (N
Ln
61�
to oo o o o oo o o o o o o o Q C) c)
T o a)
o m
W5 C, co
00 0 oo
001 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 C\l 0 0 0 �?0 00
O 'r o
cl, - - r-� lo (D ll*' �cl� Lo - C� c\i .h
O OO ID Nm 04 LO r- N
0 (D c\i (1) c2 a) o Noo N It , - m ul
tp to m (D N — 04
Ooo (D 10 N CO Im c\l IQ m 'IT LO
m Lo r- m oo n 0 1- oD r- LO o c\j
m "T r- " "T w c\l N "T w
M E9 69 L,) Lr) eq
61i W� 6.) Gq 611 to
0 0 (D (0
(D (D 0 0 C)
(D
00 (Y)
LO cc) m
(o a)
't
O
0
a)
'r
oo
to
LL
F -
z
U -i
z
oO o m
cco
o
<
g)
2!
6e
LU
to
0000
0 0 0 o (D
CD
o o o
(D tL 'c7
T
LU
U2 LL
06
F, - <
> > co
O
>
LU
0
�2
(o oo
�2Mco
CL C:
0 0 11 00 0
0 0 0 ON coo
C� 0
CO
61)
00010
00
O NO
(D 00 (D
00 m
001 0 m MIu� CIII N (D m N
oO l 6q M m
:� N
Mr-� r-- to N m
a5 c)
O-0000000II,(
oo
(D Ilo
m Cl)
.q
(0 (7)
LO cl)
(N c\j (o Tr
om0000000
MN�! 0) 00
M Cl)
C14 (N
000000000
0 0
C� C�
0 00
LO
0000 omocc0000
000 0 - ��! (3) C11 .0
c:>
V (D 0 00 m (Y)
�2r- Cl) 0
M 0 ER
C\1
0 00 a)a) (D oo N o o N
(D Lf) oo (9 6<) r� o EF3 6A (D
o) -N MI() -q 17� O - I
7 ba o m a)
c\j
69
O
bl
Z_
Z),
LL
F -
z
U -i
z
<
g)
2!
LU
WL=
D
(D tL 'c7
T
LU
U2 LL
06
F, - <
> > co
- 'D LL
>
LU
c I r
�O
>-
w �2 -2�
> J,
CL C:
C', U-
C,
E (0 U) o- 0 0
2
Zq)
LLI
0* 2
aE) 0
Uu
3:
> 0
p 0 !E m (D 0 m 2 2
!�
Z' -9 -2
ui
LL!
1 L
U)
U) in 0 CL SSU J) CL
Cc 0
w
0
<1
<1 < < IL
U)i
21
Co 'D , � O N M, w tO cm,
0 0 0 0 N ("i N C\1 C, m m uj N N
m 11 Ini
< 74 7,
CN 'T C, ff
- ON
ml
cli cli CN N (\I N cli N " N cli C'I 12� " C'I
'C' C,
Cl)
wi
ig
A
C�'
fl -
CO, C� ID In
O C'j 0 C'I (Dm
C\4 (0 N'T
C14 M
(q o P-� m
'0 co to -
LO m 0)
M (o
r--
co - to
N
Ge
M LO
61) 04
0 0 C) 0
0
O0 0 40 0
(0
0
r.
w 0 0 h 0 w 00.0 o
er
OO (D
w
000
64 Vi 614 'A
6"3
m 0 69 IV), o 091
10) C�
O
0
tD.
w 0 m m ft5 m 0 V) 691 0
C� Iq 0i
IT
cl
0
C,4
-0
N N3 6%
U�
co (D
q a)-
:3
IT m
0
r-- (D 0
cli
0
-cliq
Cl) 00
0
(N
64
U*) P-�
q
c7) N V M a)ZT
t,:,
'62'. "Oi
Cl
) �O
U<i'
to mC\�
0
tc�
#943
o
'D cl
c,
C-4
Q
h
6a ce V), f V�
(D
cl)
to
NN (1) N
cl ��l , f9 c\j
61) u� (9m
-It
to
I 61�
Iq
> E
0: w.
0
to
to
696
Ov
U to
E
E
C, C, 0 0
C:,
0 0 0 0 0
CL
-i
E 2 OE -j
- - 00 0 0 0
00
z
c < 0
Uzi
<
60�ul�•
2
UJ
00
W
�
0 0
C� 9
-J
o- <
E LZO
—
co 03
m
0
0-
F-
E cu E E ,
z
ui 0 UJ
u) F-
W
Lli
N
0 0
I
D F-
c
EL
U)
U_
M
JN
0moo
<
z
C)
Lon
0
O0
C04
75 0 0
000001 o o o o 01-
16%0 0
T - M 9 Ili
<t (Y) 0
(0 Lf)
LO
C-4
Wi
O O oO�al 0 0 00 o '0 o OICD
IT W) 10 ` �:�
Cl) m L2 . - (0 Ll�
60 U) N 00
0 (D
C11
0 0 CD C)
0
Ow
c00000a
(0
0
O 0 0 0
0
000 0 0 00
—
0
'r
m
In
12 C) (D m 00
C0 Ll�
r
0
cli
60
c\j
oo
(N
.0 M
C-4
co (D
q a)-
:3
IT m
0
r-- (D 0
cli
0
M LO 0
O (0 M
If) V)
64
co -IT
D 0
LL z
c7) N V M a)ZT
NMo
o� 10 LO (o
ql
04 N co
o co (D (Y) u) I-
o
to
o
'D cl
c,
clj v7 (D c\1 o cy)
Q
h
c\l 61)
c\j
ea
(D
cl)
to
NN (1) N
cl ��l , f9 c\j
61) u� (9m
-It
to
I 61�
Iq
(D 0 0 r— (0 U') 0 0 0
(D 0 00
Cl)�2 00,
19 CD r-� 10 - - - ON CO
LD (
10 � M�;
.M-, 01
04
0 0 0 0 0 0 o (D 0 010
M0)MOMNN 0(00
" ") 0 0) 00 co 0 0 fw
w U'l m 0 (0 0
u-, 4 (Y) 0) P-,� o v
— C\j co CD
000000000c>
00
lz� Oa
00
�!
0000O0000000
MMMNN 10
N - u-, 0 m oc� C� o 0
w U.) m 0 0 0 o -IT r-
-In 't d' 0 0 co m
0
N co
(0 LO w 'Ir m N
w Wn m N n o
Om (mo cc.4 �no 'Lon c2
&af9 Efl
0 (
(0
O (D m
0 LO NC, C.,j - co L'i
co
(v m �� Q Nu) ID 10 1 000
) c, o
6A
r.0 an 1 0 CD 0
,q g m 't r 00 I--
cli
at);: N
(0 . �* 1
6,
0 0 CD C) 1 000
r— 00
1,
000
10
cl�
U) �2
—
In Inj
C\1
00
r
cl
cli
LLJ 0
z
.0 M
C-4
Z°
D 0
h V m
IT m
0
r-- (D 0
LL
0
M LO 0
O (0 M
If) V)
N
(a cq m
U3, to
C9 0)
Oly to
a I
00
CD
m co
tw a
cn
r— to
N
m CD
fH V)
Ol
e 1m
00
09 69 in
U,
14,
v
O
cn
Z
In Inj
cl
Z
LLJ 0
z
0, 0,
Z°
D 0
0
z
E IL
LL
0
0
EO
D 0
LL z
LU
L)
CS, 2� 'LIJ
z
u
LU
CJ
W :)
U) U.
>
w
0
-ma t 5;
-u"
0
(ul'
1>3
z z
E -
> E
0: w.
0
E
U.1)
E cr)
x
E
E
0
uj U,
aw U)
> <
CL
-i
E 2 OE -j
'D a.
0
z
c < 0
Uzi
<
2
UJ
z
-6
E E z
-j
<
-J
o- <
E LZO
—
co 03
m
0
0-
F-
E cu E E ,
z
ui 0 UJ
u) F-
W
Lli
X
W 7 " (D M LIJ
F-
CL
D F-
c
EL
U)
U_
M
JN
0moo
<
z
P
Z
0� P
LU
<
75 0 0
z
U- CL
m 0- CL d
a
5 E t
n U- CC W na Lu X
> W
N 'T LO -0
(0 h m
cu
N co Iq U) QO
C, cc 0
(D .0 m
0 00
0 0 0 o
M m Mm
0 0 (D 0 0
z 'r --T >
000
ui
"S (O co ID Q 110 0 (0 to '0
10 O (0
v
O
GENERAL FUND
PROPOSED BUDGET FY 2012-2013
REVENUES & OTHER OPERATIONAL SOURCES
1,597,809
Taxes
2,365,750
Property Tax and related
13,884,020
Sales Tax / Triple Flip
17,046,000
Sales Tax -Measure S
6,450,000
Franchise Tax
3,162,000
Business Tax
2,430,030
Transient Occupancy Tax
1,905,000
Other Agencies
Motor Vehicle License In -Lieu Fees -
CSA #19 Fire Service 1,493,010
VLF Backfill 4,251,993
Other Agencies (Prop 172, Owner Prop Tax, State Mandate, Other agencies) 625,300
Other Revenues
Permits & Licenses (building, electrical, encroachment, use, alarm) 1,685,000
Fine & Forfeitures (traffic, vehicle, etc.) 714,700
Interest & Rents (investment earnings, rents, etc.) 148,215
Charges for Services (includes dev't fees and plan review) 2,099,750
Other Revenue (damage reimbursements, misc income) 225,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub -total: Revenues $ 56,120,018
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRaNSFERSIN
from ADA Projects Fund -201
from Gas Tax/Meas A Fund -206 440.000
from Paramedic/EMT Fund -210 280,200
from SRSD Sewer Maint Fund -227 227,500
from Parking Services Fund -501 437,495
from Fire Equipment_602_________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------100,000
-------------- -----------
Sub -total: Transfers -1-n 1,485,195
-----------------------------------------------------------In -------------------------------------------------------------
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER OPERATIONAL USES
Expenditures by Department
Finance
1,597,809
Non -Departmental
2,365,750
City Manager/City Council
1,631,431
City Clerk
435,569
Mgt Serv: Adm,IT,HR,Pkg.Emg
1,462,321
City Attorney
806,624
Community Development
2,971,297
Police
19,269,977
Fire
14, 461, 796
Public Works
8,911,599
--Library-------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- - -----768 -
Sub -total: Expenditures
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 56,145,941
TRANSFERS orr
to ADA Projects Fund -201 50,000
to Building Improvement -603 100,000
to Storm Water Fund -205 300.000
to Recreation Fund -222 988,998
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub -total: Transfers Out $ 1,438,998
EXHIBIT II
J N
W
c
LL o
O
a
Q 'a
LL
LL N
k.
OO
U Q
r> a t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
wr-rnLn - or rncoLO. -rno
O O 'f X 00 M O N 6) Lo r- m Lo O
w N `-
O r
o N
'0 M Lo No O O O O g M O O 'T O
d r N O L O Lf) O O r- N O O N M
pO C 1 00 C co N 0 rte- N N S COO C�6 N
O r M
0- N
N C LO N 0 0 O, O O V M O O V
M
N LO 0 Lf) O O r• N 0 0 0 M
N N Op 0) m N c- O Lf) M r- N 6 O
j LO t`•- N N M 0 r• N
d r co
O
N
mr to co 0000 O O 6) Lf) 00 N O
0 r MLn0r.o00M-000r- 00
N N O M N r- CO O CO r- -- O N 6) O0
N CO r N Cl) O) M M
O
N
O tf) 0 0 0 0 O O O 6) 00 O O N (O
N N .- .- m N r- LO 0 LON O O O LO
O N M r• N M O CO C d'
N
OO O O O O O O O O O M O O M
O O
LO N LO O r- O O O N CO O M LO to
d
N N r- .1i M NW, Lo' r, fit' M ct' LO CO M
CNCO r- NMOr-�
N
coO O 00
00
O O O M O O M
O
O LO N LO O r- 0 0 0 r CO O M O
d
N (14 6) rf M co M td) r- a- r- Cl) LS) M Lf)
N CO M N M O t'- Vim'
Q.' O
N
iE+ �
O j,
H �
O
cc
L
O.
E
O
tU
Lit
C
t4
t3
G
t)
O O C � 3
CJ C
O O
CU
C3 CJ)
@ >
w U) 4) tl}
7} C y
N CU
tti � � m t3 E O
E o a� m E a)
E E <L U C C m cl, 0 .�
E E> >, O c a
0 O O }' .- '-' 0 C -Q m O C
o U 0 0 0uiii i1�;tZn
c a)
o
O O
N Q
co 0 a O Co
-
N O U
Li 'CE � - �
F— Q. O C
LL O OL N a
En'0 all
N O O O
O rn 0 1
C �
C 3:'C
E OC -0
C Y
1-0 tn
C
a)~ 0
C M
.2 N
cr CU N O a)
Q} N * to
E N
E N cn N Cts O1
c u)
.O O O
+� O
'u) E n E
N p O O C
�Q-°'QEC
E Ecn o
N .E CSS O N
CL W
c> E o
CU _
Q Ct7 N
L3
C Obi " N - �
O C W N
O'
L "
Ca) 0 O C
NO E C j u)
1 — 04 N
C O O
C 3 O 3: 73: C'
N C N E
Q) o .O 0 N CD
0 U) C C
OE O m m
I- > O m o U)
RESOLUTION NO. 13383
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN RAFAEL ADOPTING THE MEASURE'S'
COMMITTEE REPORT COVERING THE PROPOSED
FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2005, the voters of San Rafael approved a
Transactions and Use Tax ("Measure S"). This measure amended the San Rafael
Municipal Code to establish a .5% retail transactions and use tax within the City of San
Rafael; and
WHEREAS, the enabling ordinance required the appointment of an independent
citizens' oversight committee that is required to review the collection and expenditure of
tax revenues collected under the authority of this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Finance Director reported to the Committee on the status of the
2011-2012 budget and the economic trends and fiscal policy direction that impact the
development of the General Fund Budget for fiscal year 2012-2013; and
WHEREAS, on June 21, 2012, the Committee met and reviewed the City's
Proposed General Fund Budget for fiscal year 2012-2013; and
WHEREAS, the Committee finds that Measure S revenues are being spent
consistent with the Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance; the Committee noted that even
with Measure S funding, it was necessary to reduce some essential service levels due to
General Fund revenues not keeping up with inflation coupled with increased personnel
costs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the San Rafael City Council adopts the report
from the Measure 'S' Committee, which is attached to this Resolution as EXHIBIT I.
1, ESTHER C. BEIRNE, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City
Council of said City held on Monday the 2nd day of July, 2012, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Connolly, Levine, McCullough & Mayor Phillips
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS.- None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Heller
ESTHER C. BEIRNE, City Clerk
W:\Management Services- WorkFile\Finance- WorkFile'Council Material Aeso I utions\2012T ity'Neasure S comm 12-13 report.doc
City of San Rafael
Measure S Oversight Committee Report
June 25, 2012
The City of San Rafael Measure S Oversight Committee (the Committee)
reviewed the projected budget for the term July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013 for
the City of San Rafael at its meeting on June 21s', 2012 with particular
attention to the budgeted expenditures for the Police Department, Fire
Department and Public Works Department which are considered the core of
the "essential services" contemplated under Measure S.
The Committee finds that, in the aggregate, the expenditures for two of the
three "essential services" departments, Police and Fire, is slightly smaller
($269347) than the inflation adjusted 2005-2006 baseline year total
expenditures for these departments. This is a change from the previous year
when the expenditures were larger but still within one percent of the baseline.
However, the committee notes that manpower levels in both departments will
remain the same in 2012-13 as in 2011-12. Therefore with respect to the
Police and Fire Departments Measure S funds are being used appropriately.
Nonetheless, due to operating cost increases beyond inflation, the growth in
population being served and shortfalls in all sources of city general fund
revenues, including the Measure S Transaction and Use Tax, the city is unable
to maintain the baseline level of "essential services" that were provided by the
Police and Fire departments in 2006, despite the incorporation of additional
efficiencies. Restoration of these services to the levels of the baseline 2006
levels will require significantly increased rates of spending in the future.
Projected expenditures for the third "essential service" department, Public
Works, are projected to be $753,564 below the inflation adjusted baseline
expenditure for this department, continuing to result in an inability to
maintain the level of service as at the baseline year. In fact, manpower for
Public Works continues to be reduced.
Therefore, in the opinion of the Committee, these essential services are not
being maintained as contemplated by Measure S. However the Committee
finds that Measure S funds are being spent consistent with the Transaction
Measure S Oversight Committee Report continued
and Use Tax ordinance, unfortunately the revenue from Measure S, combined
with the general fund revenue from all other sources, is insufficient to
maintain "essential service" levels at the 05/06 base year level.
Respectfully submitted:
Lisa Goldstein Fait, Chair
Vickie Hatos,
Larry LldekhXm, Committee Member
Gladys GiViland, Committee Member
Cliff Detz, Committee fieneer
Samantha Sar�en't�,6mm-ee Member
Wckie Schmidt, Committee Member
2
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
INSTRUCTIONS: USE THIS FORM WITH EACH SUBMITTAL OF A CONTRACT, AGREEMENT,
ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION BEFORE APPROVAL BY COUNCIL / AGENCY.
SRRA/ SRCC AGENDA ITEM NO. 5b-1
DATE OF MEETING: July 2, 2012
FROM: Mark Moses
DEPARTMENT: Finance
DATE: June 26, 2012
TITLE OF DOCUMENT:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-
2012 FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVISING THE FINAL FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 BUDGET
Department Head (signature)
(LOWER HALF OF FORM FOR APPROVALS ONLY)
APPROVED AS COUNCIL / AGENCY
AGENDA ITEM:
City Manager (signature)
SAII&IMSM
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney (signature)
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
INSTRUCTIONS: USE THIS FORM WITH EACH SUBMITTAL OF A CONTRACT, AGREEMENT,
ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION BEFORE APPROVAL BY COUNCIL / AGENCY.
SRRA / SRCC AGENDA ITEM NO. 5b-2
DATE OF MEETING: July 2,2012
FROM: Mark Moses
DEPARTMENT: Finance
DATE: June 26, 2012
TITLE OF DOCUMENT:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL APPROVING THE BUDGET FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 AND PROVIDING FOR THE APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURE OF ALL SUMS SET
FORTH IN SAID BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF V 8, 0 -1 1, / J -,F
Department Head (signature)
(LOWER HALF OF FORM FOR APPROVALS ONLY)
APPROVED AS COUNCIL / AGENCY
AGENDA ITEM:
M
/ 7
It
A YIA if "(-�
City Manager (signature)
F-2:1 W NOW 2 BRIM 10611 IN V kyl
City Attorney (signature)
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
INSTRUCTIONS: USE THIS FORM WITH EACH SUBMITTAL OF A CONTRACT, AGREEMENT,
ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION BEFORE APPROVAL BY COUNCIL / AGENCY.
SRRA / SRCC AGENDA ITEM NO. 5b-3
DATE OF MEETING: July 2, 2012
FROM: Mark Moses
NATE: June 26, 2012
I U :101 519 6*41-11 _j:ll
Department Head (signature)
(LOWER HALF OF FORM FOR APPROVALS ONLY)
APPROVED AS COUNCIL / AGENCY
AGENDA ITEM:
f /1"t I -"f,-,
r Ls
a0 a M
4
j,4
City Attorney (signature)