Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 1705 (Animal Control Regulations)CLERK'S CERTIFICATE I, JEANNE M. LEONCINI, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, and Ex -officio Clerk of the Council of said City, do hereby certify that the foregoing Charter Ordinance No. 1705 entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, AMENDMENTS TO THE ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN TITLE 8 OF THE MARIN COUNTY CODE" is a true and correct copy of an Ordinance of said City and was introduced at a REGULAR meeting of the City Council of the City of San Rafael, held on the 18th day of NOVEMBER, 1996, published as required by City Charter in the MARIN INDEPENDENT JOURNAL, a newspaper published in the City of San Rafael and passed and adopted as an ordinance of said City at a REGULAR meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 2nd day of DECEMBER, 1996, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Cohen, Heller, Miller, Phillips and Mayor Boro NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the City of San Rafael this 3rd day of DECEMBER, 1996. JEANVM. LEONCINI.�City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 17 Q5 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, AMENDMENTS TO THE ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN TITLE 8 OF THE MARIN COUNTY CODE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: DIVISION 1. Section 6.10.010 of the San Rafael Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 6.10.010 -- AdoAtion of County Code. Pursuant to Section 50022.9 of the Government Code, the Marin County Animal Control Code, set forth in Title 8 of the Marin County Code as Chapters 8.04, 8.08 and 8.12, including all current amendments thereto, through and including Marin County Ordinance No. 3236, is adopted by reference, and is in full force and effect within the City of San Rafael, with the following deletions, modifications, and amendments: Section 8.04.179 of the Marin County Animal Control Code ("Prohibition of habitual animal noise which disturbs the peace") is amended as follows: (1) "Chief of Police or the Chief of Police's designee" is substituted for "Sheriff" where it appears in Subsections (c), (d) and (e) of Section 8.04.179. (2) "San Rafael Municipal Code" is substituted for "Marin County Code" where it appears in Subsection (b) of Section 8.04.179. DIVISION 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase be declared invalid. ORIvfNFlor��5 DIVISION 3. This Ordinance shall be published once in full before its final passage in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of San Rafael, and shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. ERT/Z. $SIV MAYOR ATTEST: JE M. LE �ICIT�CLERK The foregoing Ordinance No. 1705 was read and introduced at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Rafael, held on the 18th day of November, 1996, and ordered passed to print by the following vote to wit: AYES: Councilmembers: Cohen, Heller, Miller, Phillips & Mayor Boro NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None and will come up for adoption as an Ordinance of the City of San Rafael at a Regular Meeting of the Council to be held on the 2nd day of December, 1996. JEANW M. LEONCI I, CITY CLERK wp51\ord2 CITY �� NOTE: STAFF REPORT + ' MARIN COUNTY ANIMAL u 18..CONTROL ORDINANCE OF °`, AGENDA ITEM No.:......... This material not SAN RAFAEL NOS Ordinance with City's MEETING DATE:...... •••---� Ordinance No. 1705. P.O. BOX 151560, SAN RAFAEL, CA 94915-1560/PHONE: (415) 485-3065 <4-R)j.m.l. REPORT TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNGIL SUBJECT: ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6.10 OF THE SAN RAFAEL MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, AMENDMENTS TO THE ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS AND DOG LICENSE FEES MAX11<- IN R 8.04 OF THE MARIN COUNTY CODE. SUBMITTED BV:......./�...... APPROVED BY:................... ... ................ SUZANNEST. CITY MANAGER City Manapor DATE: November 12, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6.10 OF THE SAN RAFAEL MUNICIPAL CODE BACKGROUND/SUMMARY: The Marin County Board of Supervisors amended sections of Chapter 8.04 (pertaining to Animal Control) of the Marin County Code on October 8, 1996. Amendments were made in the following sections of the county code: 8.04.050 Confinement & Quarantine 8.04.060 License Fees 8.04.070 Delinquent License Penalty 8.04.150 Fees for Redemption, Placement, Surrender 8.04.181 Potentially Dangerous and vicious Dogs A copy of Marin County Ordinance # 3236, which presents the amendments in their entirety, accompanies the proposed City Ordinance. It is anticipated that these amendments will be implemented in early 1997, following approval by each of the Marin cities and towns. The proposed amendments and license fee increases are unanimously supported by the Marin Managers Association. if implemented, the fees charged by the Marin Humane Society will remain highly competitive with or below the fees charged by neighboring humane societies/animal control agencies. The proposed dog license fee increases are summarized below. License Cateaory Spayed/Neutered Dogs Dogs Not Spayed/Neutered Current Fee Proposed 1 year $ 7.00 $10.00 2 years 13.00 15.00 3 years 18.00 20.00 1 year $20.00 30.00 2 years 39.00 45.00 3 years 57.00 60.00 REPORT TO MAYOR AND CIT1 %-..OUNCIL / PAGE: 2 These license changes constitute an average increase of about 8%-. The dog license fees for senior or disabled people remain unchanged. For the Council's information, it is the City Attorney's opinion that Proposition 218 has no bearing on increasing dog license fees. Prop. 218 relates to increases in taxes, assessments and property related fees. County Counsel concurs with this opinion. As the City Council is aware, San Rafael and all of the other Marin cities and towns and the County are members of a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) which contracts with the Marin Humane Society for a variety of animal control and shelter services. Pursuant to the terms of that JPA, San Rafael must adopt all amendments to the County's animal control ordinance. attach. - Ord A1:Vwimal Animal Control Chapter 8.04 ORDINANCE 3236 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MARIN AMENDING SECTIONS 8.04.050, 8.04..060, 8.04.070, 8.04.150, 8.04.181, OF THE MARIN COUNTY CODE PERTAINING TO CONFINEMENT & QUARANTINE FEE PAYMENT, INCREASE IN LICENSE FEES FOR DOGS, DELINQUENT LICENSE FEES PENALTY, INCREASED FEES FOR REDEMPTION, PLACEMENT OR SURRENDER, POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS DOGS SERVICE AND CLASSIFICATION. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Marin does hereby ordain as follows: Section I. Section 8.04.050 of the Marin County Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.04.050 Confinement & Quarantine. (a) Unlicensed dogs under the age of four months shall be confined in the property of the owner, and all dogs shall be so confined for thirty days after receiving the initial rabies vacation. (b) The owner of a quarantined animal shall pay a fee of thirty dollars toward an animal control officer's costs in providing and insuring that the animal is quarantined at the animal owner's property. If any person fails or refuses to obey any lawful order for the quarantine of an animal for observation of rabies, any animal control officer may impound the animal for such quarantine at the additional expense of the owner at the rate of twelve dollars per day for each dog, and nine dollars for each cat. (c) Ouarantine fees are navable within 30 days of issuance of an invoice. Pavment is delinquent if not received within. 60 days. In the event that payment is not received within 50, days, a delincuencv charge equaliinq t1 -Le amcur_t of the invoice shall be assessed. For each additional month of delinquencv another twenty percent penalty shall be assessed. Section II.Section- 8.04.060 of the Marin County Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.04.060 License fee. -(a) The dog license fee shall be imposed on all dogs. The license fee for dogs which have not been neutered or spayed shall be thirty dollars for a one year license, forty-five dollars for a two -,rear license and sixLy dollars for a three year license. (b) The license fee for dogs which have been neutered or spayed shall be ten dollars for a one year license, fifteen dollars for a two year license and twentv dollars for a three 1 year license. The fee is due and payable with the issuance of a license as required in Section 8.04.030. Section III. Section 8.04.070 of the Marin County Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.04.070 Delinquent license penalty. Any owner failing to procure and pay for such a license within the period allowed in Section 8.04.30 shall pav a delinquent penalty in the amount of twentv dollars. The delinquent penalty may be waived where failure to pay is due to reasonable cause and circumstances beyond the control of the dog owner which shall be determined by the poundkeeper or the county tax collector. Any person dissatisfied with a determination '?envi.ng Waiver of the delinquent penalty shall be entitled to a hearing which shall be conducted pursuant to the provisions of Section 8.04.122. Every owner of a dog which is over the age of four months and which is kept in the county shall procure a license for each such dog, for each year, commencing within thirty days of vaccination and ending one year following the date of issue of such license, Such license shall be procured not later than thirty days after the day upon which the dog is four mcnths old, or within thirty days after the day upon which the dog, if over the age of four months, is first owned by a resident of the county and thereafter shall be maintained on a current basis from year to year. Section IV. Section 8.04.150 of the Marin County Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.04.150 Fees for redemption, placement, surrender. (a) Redemption Fees. No dog or other animal may be released by the poundkeeper to the owner until all charges, cost of redemption and the current y-ar's license charge have been paid. The charges and cost of redemption of the impounded animal shall be a fee of thirty-five dollars for the first=tLtpc, iidme .t 1 .�..nP fiscal year, a fee of fifty dollars for the second impoundment in any fiscal year, a fee of seventy-five dollars for the third impoundment in any fiscal year, a fee of one hundred dollars for the fourth impoundment in anv fiscal year, and a fee of one hundred twenty-five dollars for each additional impoundment in any fiscal year plus in each impoundment a charge of ten dollars per day for keeping of any dog, and a charge of eight dollars per day for the keeping of any cat or other animal, except as to the keeping of such animals specified in Section 8.04.220, of which the keeping charges shall be specified in Section 8.04.220. (b) Placement of Animals. When a dca or other animal is sold by the poundkeeper, pursuant to this chapter, the price shall not be less than ten dollars for dogs and two dallars for cats and other small animals. (c) Surrender. The surrender of an animal by owner to the poundkeeper subsequent to impoundment for a violation of this chapter or any provisions of state i.aw shall not relieve the owner of the obligation to pay such charges as set forth in this section, prior to such surrender, plus the accumulated boarding charge or those applicable charges set forth in Section 8.04.220. (Ord. 3068 § 3, 1991; Ord. 2901 § 2, 1986; Ord. 2640 § 2, 1981; Ord. 2570 § 2, 1980; Ord. 2424 § 3, 1979; Ord. 2289 § 3, 1977; Ord. 1963 § 1, 1973; Ord. 1712 § 9, 1969; Ord. 1333 § 4.4, 1964) Section V. Section 8.04.181 of the Marin County Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.04.181 Potentially dangerous and vicious dogs. (a) Except as otherwise provided under the provisions of subsec`ions (b) through (m) of this section, the provisions of Chapter 9, Articles 1 through 5, Sections 31601 through 31683 and any amendments thereto exclusive of Sections 31602, 31603, 31606 and 31644 of the Food and Agricultural Code are adopted and incorporated by reference herein. (b) "Potentially dangerous dog" means any of the following: (1) Any dog which, when unprovoked on two separate occasions within the prior thirty-six month period, engages in any behavior that requires a defensive action by any person to prevent bodily injury when the person and the dog are off the property of the owner or keeper of the dog; (2) Any dog which when unprovoked bites a person causing a less severe injury than as defined in Section 31604 of the Food and Agricultural Code; (3) Any dog which when unprovoked has killed, seriously bitten, inflicted injury or otherwise caused injury attacking a domestic animal off the property of the owner or keeper of the dog. (c) "Vicious dog" means any of the following: (1) Any dog seized under Section 599aa of the Penal Code and upon the sustaining of a conviction of the owner or keeper under subdivision (a) of Section 597.5 of the Penal Code; (2) Any dog which, when unprovoked, in an aggressive manner: inflicts severe injury on or kills a human being; (3) Any dog -previously determined to be and currently listed as a potentially dangerous dog which, after its owner or keeper has been notified of this determination, continues the behavior described in Section 8.04.181(b) or is maintained in violation of Section 31641, 31642 or 31643 of the California Food and Agricultural Code. (d) "Animal control department" means that agency appointed as poundkeeper for the County of Marin under the provisions of Section 8.04.110. (e) "Director" means executive director of Marin County animal services or any person authorized to act on his/her behalf. (f) A hearing on whether a dog shall be declared potentially dangerous or vicious shall be conducted in the following manner: (1) If the director has investigated and determined that there exists probable cause to believe that a dog is potentially 3 dangerous or vicious as defined by this section, a hearing shall be conducted. The director shall prepare a petition specifying the basis as to why the dog is potentially dangerous or vicious. (2) Whenever possible, anv complaint received from a member of the public which serves as the evidentiary basis for the direcuor to find probable cause shall be sworn to and verified by the complainant and shall be attached to the petition. (3) Prior to commencement of the hearing and if the allegations of the petition indicate that the dog is potentially dangerous as defined under Section 8.04.181(b), the county administrator or his designee may offer in writing mediation services as an alternative to a hearing provided both the complainant and the owner agree in writing to mediation. Mediation must be concluded within thirty days of the offer to mediate. If mediation is refused cr is u s-.ccessful, then the matter shall be referred to a hearing under subsection (f)(1) of this section. (4) The county administrator or his designee shall designate a hearing officer from a panel of up to five persons whose membership shall be designated by the board of supervisors. Hearing officer applicants shall have had a minimum of five years' experience as a practicing attorney and prior experience in administrative, arbitration or mediation hearings. Prior experience in care and control of animals shall also be considered but is not necessary. The nearing officer shall conduct a hearing on whether a dog shall be declared potentially dangerous or vicious. The hearing officer shall be compensated for the actual hours devoted to the hearing and its determination at the existing hourly rate or fraction thereof allowed a traffic referee of the Marin County municipal court. (5)(i) The county administrator or his designee shall provide written notice to the owner of the specific behavior of the animal alleged in the petition and the date upon which a hearing will be held to consider the petition. The hearing shall be held within the time limits set forth by the Food and, Agricultural Code Section 31621 or anv amendments thereto., The notice shall advise the owner of the conse-quences Of a finding of potentially dangerous or vicious and the owner's right to present evidence as to why the dog should not be declared potentially dangerous or vicious. Service of the notice shall be made in accordance with Section 1.04.190. Where the owner or address of any affected owner is unknown, notice of the hearing shall be given by posting the same in the office of the director and by publication in a newspaper of general circulation. Notice shall then be deemed given on publication of the notice. (ii) A hearing may be continued if the hearing officer deems it necessary and proper or upon a showing of good cause. - (iii) The time for hearing and the hearing provisions of subsection (d) (5) (i) of this section shall be staved if mediation services are offered pursuant to the provisions of subsection (f)(3) of this section. The time of hearing and the hearing provisions of this subsection_ shall recommence at the date the 3 county administrator or his designee has determined in writing that mediation has not been accepted or has been unsuccessful. (6) In cases where complaint(s) from the public serve as the evidentiary basis for the director to prepare a petition, at least one of the, complainants or his or her designee in the matter must appear and testify at the hearing or the complaint shall be dismissed. (7) If the owner fails to appear at the hearing, the hearing shall nevertheless proceed and an appropriate order shall be issued. (8) The hearing officer shall consider all relevant responsible evidence without regard to the formal rules of evidence, including circumstances of mitigation, and the record of any prior violations by the owner. (9) All witnesses shall testify under oath or affirmation. The oath shall be administered by the hearing officer. The hearing officer may, when appropriate, request the production of oral or documentary evidence which is reasonably necessary and relevant to conduct a hearing. All proceedings shall be tape recorded. (10) The hearing officer shall issue a written determination based upon a preponderance of the evidence, which shall be mailed to the owner within seven days after the hearing is completed. (11) If an animal is found to be potentially dangerous or vicious by a preponderance of the evidence, the animal shall be so designated on the records of Marin County animal services. Such a designation shall be considered in future determinations involving the animal and/or owner. (12) The owner of a dog for which a potentially dangerous petition has been issued may irrevocably waive his or her right to a hearing and any further appeal under Food and Agriculture Code Section 31622 and accept all conditions, sanctions and penalties set forth in Food and Agriculture Code Sections 31641, 31642 and 61643, and Section 8.04.181(k). The County Administrator or his Desiqnee will mail a waiver form to the doq owner. The waiver must be siqned by the doq owner and received by the Countv Designee with 4_ thirtir days from `.he date of aareement to waive or a hearir_q will be scheduled within thirty (30) days of the aareement to waive. (g) In accordance with the provisions of Food and Agricultural Code Section 31641, the owner of a potentially dangerous dog shall in addition to the regular licensing fee, pay to the animal control agency an annual fee of twenty-five dollars to provide for the increased costs of maintaining the records of the dog. (h) The owner of a dog determined to be vicious shall, in addition to the regular licensing fee, pay to the animal control agency an annual fee of fifty dollars to provide for the increased costs of maintaining the records of the dog. (i) The owner of a dog determined vicious shall, at his/her own expense, have the vicious animal registration number assigned to the dog tattooed upon the dog's left ear or, if the left ear is not available, on the left inner thigh, by a licensed veterinarian or a person trained, authorized and licensed to do business as a tattooist. As an alternative to tattooing, an owner may have a microchip injected beneath the skin, and between the shoulder blades of the animal by a licensed veterinarian. The owner shall provide proof satisfactory to Marin County animal services of such tattooing or microchipping within thirty days of the vicious determination. (j) An owner of a vicious dog shall, within ten days of such determination, present said animal at the Marin County animal services and allow photographs and measurements of the animal to be taken for purposes of identification. (k) An owner of a dog found potentially dangerous under Section 8.04.181(b), who has no additional violations of any of the provisions of Title 8 of the Marin County Code, within a thirty-six month period from the date of designation as potentially dangerous, shall be removed from the list of potentially dangerous dogs by the director. The dog may be, but is not required to be, removed from the list of potentially dangerous dogs prior to the expiration of the thirty-six month period if the owner or keeper of the dog demonstrates to the director that changes in circumstances or measures taken by the owner or keeper, such as training of the dog, have mitigated the risk to public safety. (1) An owner of a dog found vicious under Section 8.04.181(c)(3), or dangerous under the provisions of former Section 8.04.181(c) (3) (Marin Countv Ordinance 3138), who has no additional violations of any of the provisions of Title 8 of the Marin County Code, after a thirty-six month period from the date of designation as vicious, or dancrerous, may apply to the director to remove the animal from the list of vicious animals. The director shall have the discretion to remove the animal from the list of vicious or dancrerous animals upon proof of the successful completion of at least eight weeks of training, or other rehabilitative efforts designed to mitigate the risk to public safety. (m) All sanctions imposed on dogs determined potentially dangerous or dangerous prior to the enactment of the ordinance codified in this section shall remain in effect, except that any violations subsequent to the enactment of this section shall be governed by this section. In determining subsequent violations the following provisions shall apply: Any dog previously determined potentially dangerous prior to the enactment of this section, shall be considered potentially dangerous as defined under the provisions of this section and subject to all of its provisions governing the regulation and disposition of potentially dangerous dogs; any dog previously determined dangerous prior to the enactment of the ordinance codified in this section shall be considered vicious as defined under the provisions governing the regulation and disposition of vicious dogs. (Ord. 3138 § 3, 1993; Ord. 3041 § 3, 1990; Ord. 3031 § 3, 1990; Ord. 2969 § 3, 1988) .:j Section VI.Publication. This ordinance shall be and is in full force and effect as of thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage and shall be published once before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage, with the names of the supervisors voting for and against the same in the MARIN INDEPENDENT JOURNAL, a newspaper of general circulation published in Marin County. PASSED AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Marin, State of California, held on the 8th day of October, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: SUPERVISORS Harry J. Moore, Annette Rose, John B. Kress NOES: NONE ABSENT: SUPERVISORS Gary Giacomini, Harol C. Brn Jr. CHAIRMAN PRO 'EM Board of Supervisors ATTEST: irk 7