The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCM Homeless Update ReportSAN RAFAEL Agenda Item No: 5.a THE CITY WITH A MISSION Meeting Date: March 6, 2017 SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Department: CITY MANAGER Prepared by: Andrew Hening, City Manager Approval: Director of Homeless Planning & Outreach TOPIC: Homeless Update Report SUBJECT: Informational Presentation on the Ritter Memorandum of Understanding RECOMMENDATION: Accept March 2017 status report on the Ritter Memorandum of Understanding, as prepared by the Director of Homeless Planning & Outreach. BACKGROUND: Beginning in March of 2016, the City of San Rafael began discussions with senior staff and board members at the Ritter Center to consider possible operational changes to their site. In August of 2016, a final set of changes was agreed upon (relocating shower services, relocating mail services, and relocating homeless food pantry services, all contingent upon the creation of comparable services elsewhere), all of which were confirmed in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and Ritter Center, dated August 15, 2016. ANALYSIS: Since the October 2016 MOU update, we have made significant progress towards the full implementation of the MOU. Mail: As of March 1St, 2017, homeless mail services at the Ritter Center have officially ended. P.O. Box 3517 has been discontinued, and 16 Ritter Street has returned to official business -use only (any client mail is being returned to sender). During the transition we learned that over 500 people who were cross-referenced as County of Marin clients had been using one of these addresses as their official mailing address. As of March 1St, any person experiencing homelessness who needs mail services can register for General Delivery with the United States Postal Service (USPS). USPS's main branch on Bellam Blvd. will be hosting this service. Through this negotiation, USPS agreed to extend General Delivery from one month to six months. If people need mail services past six months, the City will be providing subsidies for up to 100 P.O. Boxes per year ($90/year = $9,000 annually). Individuals must first verify they used the General Delivery system, and need will be reassessed every six months. FOR CITY CLERK ONLY File No.: 9-2-67 x 10-2.7 Council Meeting: 03/06/2017 Disposition: Accepted report SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 2 To mitigate any negative impact at the Post Office, the Director of Homeless Planning & Outreach connected San Rafael's Post Master Erika Garro with the San Rafael Police Department, who were able to work out an agreement for increased patrol of the area. Some Ritter clients, given their degree of disability, have historically been unable to manage their own mail and finances (less than 100 clients). To continue to accommodate these individuals, Ritter has created a separate, non-public PO Box, which will allow case managers to manage mail and finances for designated, high -needs clients. Showers: In November the Director of Homeless Planning & Outreach spearheaded the creation of a mobile shower working group, comprised of local community members and nonprofit agencies. Shortly after forming, the working group learned of a parallel effort to develop a mobile shower in Novato, which was being led by Quest Church and a local Rotary chapter. Not wanting to simultaneously invest in the same asset, these efforts merged in late December. Beginning in the New Year, the working group met on a weekly basis to discuss topics ranging from unit acquisition to operations to siting. As of this update, the group has finalized the shower unit direction. We would like to move forward with two, three -stall units, with each unit having one California ADA compliant unit (i.e. two ADA units of an overall six). These two units will cost a combined $100,000. The San Rafael Police Department has generously donated a pickup truck to tow one of the shower trailers, and we are currently looking for a second truck to round out the capital portfolio. To finance the capital costs, we are looking to partner with local philanthropic organizations. Following the purchase of the units, it will take approximately three months for manufacture and delivery. With respect to operations, the Downtown Streets Team is planning to operate the program as a social enterprise, so that they can employ Team Members in living wage employment opportunities while simultaneously expanding access to basic dignity across the community. The annual operating cost of the program will be approximately $150,000. To finance the ongoing operations, we are looking to partner with local public funding sources and private funding sources. Staff still needs to finalize both the up -front capital costs and the on-going costs. Our initial siting focus is on San Rafael and Novato; however, the mobile nature of the showers lends itself to expansion to other locales. Given the two units and proposed staffing configuration, even with Ritter discontinuing their showers, this program can actually almost double current countywide shower capacity. Given that only 15% of unsheltered people (based on the 2015 Homeless Point -in -Time Count) have reliable access to shower services, this is a critical investment. Pantry: As was discussed during the October 2016 Ritter MOU Update, the homeless pantry has remained more challenging than originally expected. The Ritter Center currently provides the most comprehensive pantry coverage in the entire county, offering access 40 hours per week. This accessibility introduced some challenges around the comparability clause of the MOU. Fortunately, as we have continued to make progress on the mobile showers, we have been able to bring the SF -Marin Food Bank on board with their potential participation in the "Marin Mobile Care" mobile services model. From initial discussions with both the Food Bank and the Ritter Center, if we are able to distribute food alongside the shower program, then both organizations feel that that will meet the comparability hurdle set forth in the MOU. And just like the mobile shower platform in general, this new model can actually increase capacity and improve access for people who have been previously unconnected to resources. SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 3 "UPLIFT": Though it is not part of the MOU, the Director of Homeless Planning & Outreach has been in discussions with the County of Marin regarding the implementation of a pilot transportation program based off of the Universal Pass for Life Improvement from Transportation (UPLIFT) Program in Santa Clara County. Through that program, local agencies are able to provide quarterly Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) transit passes for adults experiencing homelessness who are engaged in case management programs. The goal of UPLIFT is to help people get housing or employment by improving access to public transit. The program is a partnership between and subsidized by the County of Santa Clara, VTA, and the City of San Jose. Currently in Marin, people experiencing homelessness are only able to access one-time, restricted -line bus tickets. Thus, not only is there inherent value in piloting something like the UPLIFT program, but as we move towards more decentralized and distributed services, this is a particularly opportune moment to launch a pilot. COMMUNITY OUTREACH: The Director of Homeless Planning & Outreach has been providing regular community updates through City's Homeless Initiatives Newsletter, which now has over 1,300 subscribers. Notice for this presentation went out through the City's meeting announcement distribution. FISCAL IMPACT: As of March 2017, the $9,000 for P.O. Boxes through USPS is the only cost to the City for the MOU implementation. This cost will begin in FY17-18. There are currently funds available through the Homeless Initiatives Budget in the General Fund to cover this expense. OPTIONS: The City Council has the following options to consider on this matter: 1. Accept the March 2017 Ritter MOU Update as presented. 2. Direct staff to return with more information. 3. Take no action. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept the March 2017 Ritter MOU Status Update. ATTACHMENT: • August 15, 2016 MOU MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is entered into as of August 15, 2016 ("Effective Date") by and among the City of San Rafael (the "City"), a municipal corporation; Ritter Center ("Ritter"), a California non-profit corporation; and Richard Bottarini and Bonnie Bottarini (owners of 12 Ritter Street) and Leonard J. Nibbi and Janet L. `ibbi, Trustees of the Leonard J. Nibbi and Janet L. Nibbi Revocable Trust, and Alma Adda Brovelli, Trustee of the George E. and Alma Adda Brovelli Trust, and Karen M. Brovelli, Trustee of the Karen Marie Brovelli Revocable Trust (owners of 16 Ritter Street) (collectively "Owners"), (each, a "Party," collectively "Parties") with reference to the following matters. RE, CITALS A. Ritter Center was established in the early 1980s to serve the needs of local low- income residents (including homeless residents and those at risk of becoming homeless). Ritter currently provides a variety of services, including medical, mental health, case management, substance abuse, day, food pantry, shower, laundry, mail, and housing and rental assistance to low income and homeless people at real property commonly known as 12 and 16 Ritter Street, San Rafael, CA 94901 (the "Premises"), which is located in downtown San Rafael. Ritter leases the Premises from Owners (Ritter leases 12 Ritter Street from Richard nottarini and Bonnie Bottarini; Ritter leases 16 Ritter Street from Leonard J. Nibbi and Janet L. Nibbi, Trustees of the Leonard J. Nibbi and Janet L. Nibbi Revocable Trust, Alma Adda Brovelli, Trustee of the George E. and Alma Adda Brovelli Trust, and Karen M. Brovelli, Trustee of the Karen Marie Brovelli Revocable Trust). hitter currently operates pursuant to certain approvals issued by the City, including Conditional Use Permit UP13-030 ("CUP"), which was issued by the City in 2013. Ritter has rights to operate Ritter Center at the Premises pursuant to the terms of the CUP. B. Some members of the City's community perceive that (i) in recent years, the population of homeless and near -homeless persons in Marin County ("County") generally, and in downtown San Rafael in particular, has significantly increased, (ii) actions of some of the homeless and near -homeless persons in downtown San Rafael have caused adverse impacts to local residents, businesses, and visitors. It is the City's belief that changes in the services offered at Ritter Center for those persons who use its services ("Ritter Clients") could mitigate such adverse impacts. C. Over the course of the last several months, the City and Ritter have been discussing relocating some of the services offered at Ritter Center to other locations, while also preserving the availability and accessibility of those services for Ritter Clients. In addition, the City and Ritter have been cooperating in good faith to identify potential alternative sites for Ritter to relocate its facilities for serving Ritter Clients. D. Contemporaneously with the discussions referenced in the prior recital, the City held public hearings before the City Council regarding whether to modify or revoke the CUP based on, among other things, concerns expressed by members of the community that Ritter was causing or allowing nuisance conditions around the Premises. Ritter disputed these contentions and asserted, inter alfa. that Ritter was in full compliance with the CUP and that the City lacked Page 1 of 11 12574336.112573926.1 OAK #4845-2649-7842 V1 l proper legal grounds to modify or revoke Ritter's CUP. The City did not make any findings or decision to modify or revoke the CUP. E. Contemporaneously with the entry of this MOU, the City Council has publicly announced its suspension of such administrative proceedings in order to provide the Parties an opportunity to enter and implement this MOU. F. City staff has considered whether to recommend that the Planning Commission and the City Council consider a zoning change for the Premises to prohibit continued operation of the Ritter Center (after an amortization period), but neither City staff, the Planning Commission, nor the City Council have pursued such potential legislation. Ritter believes there is no legitimate basis to support a zoning change or other limitation of its rights under the CUP. G. At a duly noticed City Council meeting on June 6, 2016 (which included a duly noticed public hearing regarding Ritter's CUP), the City Council and Ritter representatives discussed the formation of a memorandum of understanding to address the City's and Ritter's interests in pursuing certain operational and locational changes regarding Ritter's services. The City Council directed City staff and counsel to pursue the drafting and entry of such a memorandum of understanding. H. The Parties have now agreed to a process to implement certain voluntary operational changes to Ritter's use of the Premises as described in this MOU, once comparable replacement services have been established at alternative locations. Replacement services must be accessible to the target population and be of similar or better quality and quantity — i.e. available during similar hours and be able to serve at least the same number of people, as set forth in this MOU. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals hereof and the mutual covenants and agreement contained in the MOU, the parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS The recitals set forth above, and all defined terms set forth in such recitals and in the introductory paragraph preceding the recitals, are hereby incorporated into this MOU as though set forth in full. 2. CONDITIONS AND TERMS FOR VOLUNTARY DISCONTINUATION OF CERTAIN PERMITTED SERVICES BY RITTER Provided that the conditions of Subsection (A) have been and remain satisfied, Ritter shall discontinue its provision of certain services on the Premises, on the replacement service terms set forth below in Subsection (B). Page 2 of 11 12574336.1 12573926. I OAK 94845-2649-7842 v I A. Conditions Precedent. (i) The City has not, subsequent to the Effective Date, recommenced administrative proceedings regarding whether to modify or revoke the CUP (which administrative proceedings were suspended contemporaneously with the City Council's approval of this MOU, as discussed in the Recitals). While satisfaction of this condition (or written waiver by Ritter thereof) is a prerequisite to the triggering of Ritter's obligations in Subsection (B) below, the City reserves and retains its police power authority to recommence administrative actions to modify or revoke the CUP. In the event that the City recommences administrative actions to modify or revoke the CUP, Ritter Center shall have no further obligations under this MOU. (ii) The City has not, subsequent to the Effective Date, commenced any legislative proceedings to consider whether to change the zoning for the Premises to prohibit such uses of the Premises made by Ritter as of the Effective Date. In the event that the City commences legislative proceedings to consider rezoning to prohibit any such use of the Premises, Ritter Center shall have no further obligations under this MOU. B. Replacement Service Terms. This Section 2(B) addresses rights and obligations with respect to replacement services, once third party providers have commenced providing certain services Ritter now provides, as follows (see Section 3, below, regarding the process for identifying such providers, among other things): (1) Food Pantry. Within 30 days of the date on which a third party commences providing (or two or more third parties commence providing), in a location mutually agreeable to the City and Ritter, no fewer than 90 meal portions per week (in the aggregate and collectively) in a reasonably comparable manner as Ritter's existing program to individuals without access to indoor cooking facilities, Ritter shall stop providing food pantry services to individuals without access to indoor cooking facilities at the Premises (and shall not resume providing such services at the Premises, except as provided in Section 5 below). For purposes of this provision, Ritter will use good faith efforts to determine those Ritter Clients who are homeless. Nothing in this Section 2(B) affects Ritter's right to provide food pantry services at the Premises to individuals and/or families with access to indoor cooking facilities. However, Ritter will provide information and meet and confer with the City with respect to food pantry services for housed individuals and/or families as discussed in Section 3. Ritter emphasizes that the best practice is to provide food pantry service for residents with access to cooking facilities co -located with benefit enrollment for Cal Fresh and Medi -Cal. (ii) Mail Services. Within 30 days of the provision, by a third party (or two or more third parties), of mailboxes or facilities capable of receiving mail for at least 150 Ritter Clients (in the aggregate and collectively) in a reasonably comparable manner as currently provided by Ritter, Ritter shall stop providing Page 3 of 11 12574336.1 1 2 5 73926.1 OAK 04845-2649-7842 v I mail services to Ritter Clients at the Premises (and shall not resume providing such services at the Premises, except as provided in Section 5 below). (iii) Shower and Laundry Services. Within 30 days of the provision, by a third party (or two or more third parties), of shower and laundry services (mobile or stationary), in a reasonably comparable manner as currently provided by Ritter, Ritter shall stop providing shower and laundry services at the Premises (and shall not resume providing such services at the Premises, except as provided in Section 5 below). 3. CITY-RITTER COOPERATION TO IMPLEMENT SECTION 2 A. Tasks and Timins for Imnlementins Section 2. The City and Ritter shall cooperate in good faith to implement Section 2(B) in a timely manner, with the understanding that (1) the City will take the lead in this regard and (2) Ritter will, acting in good faith, provide informational support and take such actions as are reasonably necessary to assist with the transition of these services. To that end, the City and Ritter shall cooperate to meet the following deadlines with the understanding that the City will be responsible for arranging for the establishment of the replacement services and Ritter will be responsible for transitioning services once replacement services are established: (i) Identification of Third Party Providers. The City and Ritter shall reasonably cooperate to identify third parties (including other non-profit organizations and the County) capable of providing each of the services described in Section 2(B). The City shall create a list of potential third party providers for each of the three services identified in Section 2(B) using informational support provided by Ritter by late September 2016. (a) The individuals from the City who are primarily responsible for implementation of this task with respect to the food pantry and mail services (sections 2(B)(i) and 2(B)(ii)) are as follows: The City Manager (currently, Jim Schutz) and the City's Homeless Services Coordinator (currently Andrew Hening), who will take the lead on behalf of the Parties with respect to food pantry and mail services. Ritter's Executive Director (currently Cia Byrnes) will cooperate in good faith with support for these efforts. (b) The individuals from the City who are primarily responsible for implementation of this task with respect to the shower and laundry services (section 2(B)(iii)) are as follows: the City Manager (currently, Jim Schutz) and the City's Homeless Services Coordinator (currently Andrew Hening) who will take the lead on behalf of the Parties with respect to shower and laundry services. Ritter's Executive Director (currently Cia Byrnes) will cooperate in good faith with support for these efforts. Page 4 of 11 12574336.1 12573926.1 OAK #4845-2649-7842 0 1 (ii) Negotiation with Third Party Providers. The City shall contact and, with Ritter's input (including providing relevant information regarding the service(s) provided by Ritter and the target population for such services), negotiate the terms of agreement(s) and/or arrangement(s) with third parties capable of providing each of the services described in Section 2(B), The City shall have contacted and have made good faith efforts to commence negotiations with such third party providers by mid-October 2016. The individuals from the City who are primarily responsible for implementation of this task are as provided for in section 3(A)(i), subdivisions (a) and (b). (iii) Commencement of Third Party Services. The City, with good faith assistance and support from Ritter, shall use good faith, commercially reasonable efforts to cause one or more third party service providers to commence providing the services described in Section 2(B)(i) by early January 2017, Section 2(B)(ii) by early January 2017, and Section 2(B)(iii) by early July 2017. The individuals from the City who are primarily responsible for implementation and individuals from Ritter primarily responsible for the transition of this task are as provided for in section 3(A)(i), subdivisions (a) and (b). B. Food Pantry Services Information and Consideration. Ritter will promptly provide, to the City, data and information reasonably requested by the City regarding the jurisdictions from which Ritter's housed and homeless clients come to receive food pantry services (though disclosure to the City of individuals' names and precise street addresses will not be required), so that the City can better understand the scope, nature, and capacities of Ritter's current food pantry operations (for housed and homeless clients alike). 4. RELOCATION OF RITTER CENTER'S REMAINING SERVICES A. Identification of a Relocation Site. The City and Ritter will continue to cooperate in good faith to identify other suitable premises in Marin County, both inside and outside the City's jurisdictional limits, where Ritter Center can potentially relocate (for the continuation of the services Ritter Center has continued to provide as of that time) ("Potential Relocation Site"). This provision does not obligate Ritter to relocate from the Premises. B. Land Use Review. The City will process in good faith any application by Ritter and potential co -tenants for entitlements (e.g., a use permit) for a Potential Relocation Site within the City's jurisdiction. 5. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS A. Resumption of Services. If a third party or parties discontinue the provision of the services identified in Section 2(B) beyond the cure period identified in Section 7, and Ritter has continued to provide any services at the Premises (e.g., it has not completely relocated pursuant to Section 4), Ritter shall be entitled to immediately begin providing such services on the Premises consistent with the CUP. Page 5 of 11 12574336.112573926 .1 OAK #4845-2649-7842 v I I B. No Abandonment. Ritter's voluntary cessation of activities authorized under the CUP pursuant to the terms of this MOU shall not constitute an abandonment of the CUP by Ritter or Owners, or any of the rights or privileges granted by the City to Ritter or Owners thereunder. C. Reservation of Autonomv. Ritter reserves the right to retain autonomy over its business, services, structure, operations, and governance. LANDLORD'S AGREEMENT TO COOPERATE AND NOT TO REPLACE RELOCATED SERVICES ON THE PREMISES Owners will not impede the City's and/or Ritter's efforts to implement this MOU and otherwise have no obligations under this MOU. 7. DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES Failure by any Party to comply with its enumerated obligations shall constitute an event of default hereunder. The non -defaulting Party or Parties shall give written notice of a default to the defaulting Party, specifying the nature of the default and the required action to cure the default. If such default remains uncured 30 days after receipt by the defaulting Party of such notice, the non -defaulting Party may exercise the remedies set forth in this Section 7. A. Ritter's Default. Ritter's failure to comply with Section 2(B), Section 3 or Section 4(A) shall constitute a default and breach of this MOU by Ritter. The City shall give written notice of a default to Ritter, specifying the nature of the default and the required action to cure the default. If such default remains uncured 30 days after receipt by Ritter of such notice, the City may exercise the remedies set forth in Section 7(D). B. City's Default. The City's failure to comply with Section 3 or Section 4, shall constitute a default and breach of this MOU by the City. Ritter shall give written notice of a default to the City, specifying the nature of the default and the required action to cure the default. If such default remains uncured 30 days after receipt by the City of such notice, Ritter and/or Owners may exercise the remedies set forth in Section 7(E). C. [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED] D. Exclusive Remedies for Ritter's Default. In the event of an uncured default by Ritter, the sole and exclusive remedy shall be to file suit for specific performance to enforce this MOU. E. Exclusive Remedies for the City's Default. In the event of an uncured default by the City, the sole and exclusive remedies shall be (i) to resume operations at the Premises consistent with the terms of the CUP and (ii) to file suit for specific performance to enforce this MOU. F. [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED] Page 6 of 11 12574336.1 12573926.1 OAK #4845-2649-7842 vl I G. No Damatres. None of the Parties shall have any liability to the others for damages or otherwise for any default, nor shall the Parties have any other claims with respect to performance or non-performance by the other Party under this MOU. Each Party specifically waives and releases any such rights or claims they may otherwise have at law or in equity in the event of a default by the other Party, including the right to recover actual, consequential, special or punitive damages from the defaulting Party. 8. MISCELLANEOUS A. Notices. All notices under this MOU shall be in writing, shall be effective upon delivery by an express delivery service which shall show the location and the delivery date and shall be addressed as follows: Ritter: Ritter Center 16 Ritter Street, R0. Box 3517 San Rafael, CA 94912 Attn: Cia Byrnes, Executive Director Tel: (415) 457-8182 City: City Manager City of San Rafael 1400 Fifth Avenue San Rafael, CA 94901 Attn: City Manager Tel: (415) 485-3070 Owners: Revardina 12 Ritter St. (APN 011-272-12) Richard Bottarini Bonnie Bottarini 806 University Street Healdsburg, CA 95448-3749 ReQardinQ 16 Ritter Street (APN 011-272-04) Leonard J Nibbi and Janet L Nibbi, Trustees Leonard J. Nibbi and Janet L. Nibbi Revocable Trust 1 182 Lea Drive Novato, CA 94945-3356 Rel?ardinl? 16 Ritter Street (APN 011-272-04) Karen M. Brovelli, Trustee of the Karen Marie Brovelli Revocable Trust 1012 Los Gamos Rd., Apt. F San Rafael, CA 94903 Alma Adda Brovelli, Trustee of the George E. and Alma Adda Brovelli Trust c/o Drakes Terrace, 275 Los Ranchitos Rd., Apt. 105 San Rafael, CA 94903 All notices shall be deemed effective on the earliest of (i) actual receipt; or (ii) rejection of delivery. Page 7 of 11 12574336.1 12573926.1 OAK 114845-2649-7842 v I B. Bindine Effect. This MOU shall inure to and bind the parties, their respective representatives, successors and permitted assigns. C. Counterparts. This MOU may be executed in counterparts, all of which taken together shall be deemed one original agreement. Photocopies or facsimiles shall constitute good evidence of such execution. D. Captions. Section, titles, or captions in no way define, limit, extend or describe the scope of this MOU or the intent of any of its provisions, and are for convenience of reference only. E. Governing Law. This MOU shall be construed in accordance with and be governed by the provisions of the laws of the State of California. F. Advice of Counsel. The Parties have received or have had the opportunity to receive independent legal advice with respect to the advisability of entering into this MOU. G. Construction of MOU. Each Party has cooperated in the drafting and preparation of this MOU and, accordingly, this MOU shall not be construed against any party as the drafter hereof. H. Waiver. No waiver of any right under this MOU shall be deemed effective unless contained in writing signed by the party charged with the waiver. No waiver of any breach or any failure to perform shall be deemed to be a waiver of any future breach or failure to perform or of any other right arising under this MOU. I. Entire Aereement. This MOU between the Parties sets forth the entire agreement of the parties and this MOU may not be modified except in writing signed by authorized signatories of the City, Ritter, and Owners. Notwithstanding this MOU, the CUP for the Premises remains in full force and effect. J. No Third Partv Beneficiaries. The Parties acknowledge and agree that there are no intended or unintended third party beneficiaries of this MOU. [Signatures on following pages] Page 8 of 11 125 74336.1 12573926.1 OAK 94845-2649-7842 v I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this MOU on the date first written above. CITY OF SA RAF. ,, a municipal corporation By:�11-- Gary . P it i s, Mayor By: %_ `l 61 L e G t%t/ Kate Colin, Vice -Mayor Maribeth Bushey, Councilmember By. — J(m , chutz, Ci _ ,,VG nager ^ ATTEST: By:-rz^aqzz a • gerjr .,_ Esther C. Beime, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: _ Q 14/ , 7_� �` P Rob Epstein, City orney [Ritter's and Owners' signatures on following pages] Page 9 of 11 12574336.112573926.1 OAK #4845-2649-7842 v1 I THE RITTER CENTER, a California non-profit corporation By: Ci rrS�113W,_Pr D'i BY: �n Bob ent, gar o it ctors [Owners' signatures on following page] Page 10 of 11 12574336.1 12 5 7 3926.1 OAK #4845.2649-7842 v 11 06095-0009 OWNERS: By:; � //- IRichard Bottarini, Owner of 12 Ritter Street Executed and entered for the sole purpose of Section 6, which sets forth the Owners' only obligations under this MOU. Leonard J. Nibbi, Trustee of the Leonard J Nibbi and Janet L. Nibbi Revocable Trust, Owner of 16 Ritter Street Executed and entered for the sole purpose of Section 6, which sets forth the Owners' only obligations under this MOU. Karen M. Brovelli, Trustee of the Daren Marie Brovelli Revocable Trust, Owner of 16 Ritter Street Executed and entered for the sole purpose of Section 6, which sets forth the Owners' only obligations under this MOU. 12574336.112573926.1 OAK H4845-2649-7842 v11 06095.0009 Bonnie Bottarini, Owner of 12 Ritter Street Executed and entered for the sole purpose of Section 6, which sets forth the Owners' only obligations under this MOU. Janet L. Nibbi, Trustee of the Leonard J. Nibbi and Janet L. Nibbi Revocable Trust, Owner of 16 Ritter Street Executed and entered for the sole purpose of Section 6, which sets forth the Owners' only obligations under this MOU. By: Alma Addax Brovelli, Trustee of the Karen Marie Brovelli Revocable Trust, Owner of 16 Ritter Street Page 11 of 11 Executed and entered for the sole purpose of Section 6, which sets forth the Owners' only obligations under this MOU. OWNERS: By; By Richard Bottarini, Owner of 12 Ritter Street Executed and entered for the sole purpose of Section 6, which sets forth the Owners' only obligations under this MOU. Leonard J, Nibbi, Trustee of the Leonard J Nibbi and Janet L. Nibbi Revocable Trust, Owner of 16 Ritter Street Executed and entered for the sole purpose of Section 6, which sets forth the Owners' only obligations under this MOU. Bonnie Bottarini, Owner of 12 Ritter Street Executed and entered for the sole purpose of Section 6, which sets forth the Owners' only obligations under this MOU. By. �anet L. Nibbi, Trustee of the Leonard J. ,Nibbi and Janet L. Nibbi Revocable Trust, Owner of 16 Ritter Street By: Karen M, Brovelli, Trustee of the Karen Marie Brovelli Revocable Trust, Owner of 16 Ritter Street Executed and entered for the sole purpose of Section 6, which sets forth the Owners' only obligations under this MOU. Page 11 of 11 12574336.112573926.1 OAK 1/4845-2649-7842 v I I Executed and entered for the sole purpose of Scction 6, which sets forth the Owners' only obligations under this MOU. �lj"t Alma Adda Brovelli, Trustee of the George E, and Alma Adda BrovelliTrust, Owner of 16 Ritter Street Executed and entered for the sole purpose of Section 6, which sets forth the Owners' only obligations under this MOU. ROUTING SLIP / APPROVAL FORM INSTRUCTIONS: Use this cover sheet with each submittal of a staff report before approval by the City Council. Save staff report (including this cover sheet) along with all related attachments in the Team Drive (T:) 4 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS --> AGENDA ITEM APPROVAL PROCESS --> [DEPT - AGENDA TOPIC] Agenda Item # Date of Meeting: 3/6/2017 From: Andrew Hening Department: City Manager Date: 2/27/2017 Topic: Subject Type: Homeless Update Report Informational Presentation on the Ritter Memorandum of Understanding ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Professional Services Agreement ® Other: Informational Presentation APPROVALS ® Finance Director Remarks: Approved with one minor edit to Fiscal Impact - MM - 2/2/17 ® City Attorney Remarks: Approved with changes to the Staff Report. ETD. 2/27/17. ® Author, review and accept City Attorney / Finance changes Remarks: Changes approved and incorporated - AH 2/27/17 ® City Manager Remarks: