HomeMy WebLinkAboutCM Marin Clean Energy ProgramCITY OF �. / Agenda Item No: 13
N/✓,fes Meeting Date: April 19, 2010
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: CITY MANAGER
Prepared by: Ken Nordhoff,
City Manager Approval:
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PARTICIPATION OPTIONS FOR CITY OF SAN
RAFAEL ELECTRICITY ACCOUNTS IN THE MARIN ENERGY AUTHORITY'S
MARIN CLEAN ENERGY PROGRAM — PHASE I CUSTOMERS
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council remain with the Marin Clean
Energy program at the "Light Green" Product Option.
BACKGROUND:
In 2002, AB 117 legislation became State law that allowed the creation of "Community Choice
Aggregation" (CCA). Local government agencies under the CCA law could purchase electricity
on their own, instead of through a sole provider, such as Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E).
In 2004, the County of Marin and local water districts began a study to assess the feasibility of a
CCA organization in Marin. The 2005 study concluded that a CCA program was indeed
feasible in Marin. Later that year, the County and local jurisdictions formed a Local Government
Task Force to track the development of a Business Plan to form a Marin CCA. The Business
Plan was prepared through contracts with consultants and subject matter experts.
The Marin Community Choice Aggregation Business Plan (completed in April 2008) sets forth
an outline for a countywide agency -- established through a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA)
among the County and participating cities -- that would provide electrical energy to its members.
The CCA, now labeled as "Marin Clean Energy" (MCE), was formed through the adoption of a
JPA for a Marin Energy Authority (MEA). The JPA established a governing board of
representatives from the County and participating cities. The JPA ordinance and related
documents were thoroughly reviewed by the City Managers, City Attorneys and other agencies'
staff as needed. The Business Plan assumed adoption of the JPA by potential member
agencies as of December 2008. The City of San Rafael conducted a lengthy public process on
this topic, and joined the Marin Energy Authority in November of 2008 via a City Council action
at a public hearing.
FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
File No.:
Council Meeting:
Disposition:
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 2
To take action on Marin's GHG emissions and begin implementation of GHG reduction
measures, the Marin Energy Authority (MEA), was launched on December 19, 2008. The MEA
Board is composed of eight elected representatives, one from each of the member jurisdictions
as follows: Belvedere, Fairfax, Mill Valley, San Anselmo, San Rafael, Sausalito, Tiburon, and
the County of Marin. The purpose of MEA is to address climate change by reducing energy
related greenhouse gas emissions and securing energy supply, price stability, energy
efficiencies and local economic and workforce benefits. It is the intent of MEA to promote the
development and use of a wide range of renewable energy sources and energy efficiency
programs, including but not limited to solar and wind energy production at competitive rates for
customers.
ANALYSIS:
The CCA language specifically was focused on the procurement of energy and the related
costs to consumers for said consumption. About 50% of a residential electric bill (based upon
various consumption levels) is tied to the amount of energy used at a property. For purposes of
this staff report and recommendations, it is worth noting that the customer cost of electricity for
billing services, transmissions and distribution remains with PG&E, irrespective of the MCE
options in place today.
Marin Clean Energy (MCE) is a program to collectively buy renewable power on behalf of Marin
County residents, cities and towns. Marin Clean Energy allows electricity customers to choose a
greater supply of clean, renewable energy. Under the program, City of San Rafael residents,
businesses and non-profit organizations will be automatically enrolled in the MCE program. All
San Rafael ratepayers can choose to opt Out of MCE and remain with PG&E. Absent specific
action by a customer, the default result is a consumer stays with the Marin Clean Energy "Light
Green" product.
On February 4, 2010 MEA signed a five year power purchase agreement with Shell Energy
North America to supply the Marin Clean Energy program. MEA will phase-in customers of
Marin Clean Energy over the course of two phases. This approach provides MEA with the ability
to start slowly and address any problems or unforeseen challenges on a small manageable
program before gradually building to full program integration for an expected customer base of
approximately 71,000 accounts.
The MCE program started in February 2010. Phase I customers, which include local
governments such as the City of San Rafael and some of the largest commercial and
residential users in the target area, have been receiving a series of notices. This first group will
need to make a choice about energy providers. Phase I customers receiving notices can go to
the MEA and PG&E web sites for more information. This staff report is only focused on City of
San Rafael electricity accounts currently billed by PG&E.
9,200 notices were sent out to Phase I customers in the Marin Clean Energy Program. Phase I
customers represent approximately 20% of the energy load of the Marin Energy Authority
jurisdiction and the summary of those accounts is shown in the chart below, excerpted from the
MCE Implementation Plan.
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 3
MCE will provide two unique energy supply options which its customers may choose from. A
"light green" option contains at least 25 percent renewable power and is expected to increase
(per MEA projections) by 50% within five years. MCE's short term Light Green rates are
comparable to PG&E rates. A "Deep Green" option offers customers the choice of 100 percent
renewable power, and comes at a premium of approximately 7% ($.01 cents per kilowatt hour —
kwh) above PG&E existing rates. A full schedule of MCE 2010 rates, as approved by the MEA
Board in February via a contract with Shell Energy North America, is included as Attachment
"A" to this report.
San Rafael Decisions:
As noted in the City's Climate Change Action Plan, San Rafael's facilities and operations
account for only 1% of the total green house has (GHG) emissions for our community.
Electricity accounts represent only a fraction of this I% calculation. I noted this data just to lend
additional context to the City's consideration of Phase I options under the MCE program.
a The City of San Rafael has the same options provided as all other MEA/MCE customers in
this Phase I process. The City can make decisions for any and all of our electricity accounts.
The three choices which are available include:
1. Opt out of the MCE program only for the City of San Rafael electric accounts. If the City
chose to opt out and stay with PG&E, the City would remain a member of the MEA JPA,
and all of the City's electricity customers would still be a part of this CCA program.
2. Remain in MCE and enroll in the "Light Green' product. This actually requires no action
on the City's part for our accounts.
3. Remain in MCE and enroll in the "Deep Green' product. This action would have
budgetary impacts, which I will address below.
Phase I customers are expected to be provided MCE power in July. After consultation with
MEA staff, they suggest customer decisions for all Phase I consumers be completed in May to
allow for a timely and orderly transition and start of service using MCE's product options. It is
my intention to formally notify the MEA representatives of your decision by next month, based
upon your direction at this meeting.
Marin Clean Energy
Enrolled
Retail Service Accounts
Phase -In Period (End of Month)
Juado
Juu•11
J44t•12
Marin Customers
Residential
6.858
6.892
61.462
$ma ' Commerc,a
4a8
44;
; .4 $
�.'edl.urn Commercia'
2R
� 8
_-.
araec—ommercial
3
J
Industrial
$treet7 'ghtmg & Traffic 124
124
368
?Uta:
1.453
1,490
7u,L15
MCE will provide two unique energy supply options which its customers may choose from. A
"light green" option contains at least 25 percent renewable power and is expected to increase
(per MEA projections) by 50% within five years. MCE's short term Light Green rates are
comparable to PG&E rates. A "Deep Green" option offers customers the choice of 100 percent
renewable power, and comes at a premium of approximately 7% ($.01 cents per kilowatt hour —
kwh) above PG&E existing rates. A full schedule of MCE 2010 rates, as approved by the MEA
Board in February via a contract with Shell Energy North America, is included as Attachment
"A" to this report.
San Rafael Decisions:
As noted in the City's Climate Change Action Plan, San Rafael's facilities and operations
account for only 1% of the total green house has (GHG) emissions for our community.
Electricity accounts represent only a fraction of this I% calculation. I noted this data just to lend
additional context to the City's consideration of Phase I options under the MCE program.
a The City of San Rafael has the same options provided as all other MEA/MCE customers in
this Phase I process. The City can make decisions for any and all of our electricity accounts.
The three choices which are available include:
1. Opt out of the MCE program only for the City of San Rafael electric accounts. If the City
chose to opt out and stay with PG&E, the City would remain a member of the MEA JPA,
and all of the City's electricity customers would still be a part of this CCA program.
2. Remain in MCE and enroll in the "Light Green' product. This actually requires no action
on the City's part for our accounts.
3. Remain in MCE and enroll in the "Deep Green' product. This action would have
budgetary impacts, which I will address below.
Phase I customers are expected to be provided MCE power in July. After consultation with
MEA staff, they suggest customer decisions for all Phase I consumers be completed in May to
allow for a timely and orderly transition and start of service using MCE's product options. It is
my intention to formally notify the MEA representatives of your decision by next month, based
upon your direction at this meeting.
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 4
FISCAL IMPACT:
Back on January 4m of this year, I provided the City Council and community an estimate of the
financial obligations related to remaining in the MEA/MCE effort. Specifically, this report stated:
Continuation in the MEA and MCE programs does not cause any immediate financial impact to the
City's budget. If the PPA moves forward, the City over the next year will need to decide to what
extent we will be customers (for City facilities), and under which options would we participate.
Some MCE program options (e.g.' dark green) will increase the cost of the City's budget.
We currently budget $876k for annual electricity costs across all funds. Using the MCE pricing
model, we can assume about % of this sum ($438k) is for PG&E transmission and distribution; the
other 50% being tied to consumption/usage. If so, a 10% dark green cost to the City could run
$44k per year. 1'11 state the obvious — with our budget challenges, any decision to pay for
electricity procurement above current costs is just another reduction in some other level of
service. This decision is not for now, but if the PPA and MCE move forward, it will be before us
for fiscal year 2010-2011.
At my request, the staff of MEA have provided a more refined estimate of annual costs should
the City consider moving to the Deep Green MCE option. Please refer to Attachment "B". All
City accounts, including public buildings, street lights, park facilities, the Terra Linda Pool, and
other electricity accounts are included in this data. As you can tell, selecting the "Deep Green'
option adds about $53,000 per year to our annual operating budget. Stated another way, the
budget for next year is projected at the same cost of $876k for electricity costs. Participating in
the 'Deep Green' program would require $53,000 of additional appropriations beyond this
forecasted budgeted level. The super -majority of this premium cost would fall to the General
Fund, beginning in fiscal year 2010-2011.
Given all of our budgetary plight and difficult decision making over these past years, even a
sum of $53,000 must be placed in context. Our forecast for next year is guarded at best.
Rising pension costs, flat tax revenues and other unknowns (such as the State picking our
pockets) result in my recommendation being stay with the MCE program and utilize the Light
Green products for all of our electricity accounts. This decision does not forgo an opportunity
to consider Deep Green in the future. And this choice places the City into a greener electricity
product at comparable costs to the PG&E rates of today.
OPTIONS:
The City Council may choose to:
1. Take no action. In doing so, the City of San Rafael will remain in the Marin Energy
Authority and the MCE 'Light Green' program. This result could also be achieved by a
formal vote, supporting the MCE Light Green alternative.
2. Withdraw from the MCE program, and keep any or all electricity accounts with PG&E.
This would require the City of San Rafael to follow the established 'opt out' processes
established by MEA.
3. Remain in MEA and direct staff to enroll in the "Deep Green' products for any or all
accounts. If this option is chosen, the cost increases will be rolled into the City fiscal
year 2010-11 budget the Council would approve in June.
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 5
ACTION REQUIRED:
Hear the staff report, and, by motion, direct staff to either withdraw from MCE as a Phase I
customer, or remain in MEA and choose either the Light or Deep green product option.
Attachments:
Attachment A — Marin Energy Authority MCE Rates with Shell Energy North America
Attachment B — MCE Deep Green Rates — San Rafael Accounts
WACity Managers- WorkRe\Council Material\Staff Reports\10\mce san rafael phase I options.doc
marin energy
authority
Rates
Attachment 'A'
Marin Clean Energy (MCE) provides two distinct energy products between which
customers may choose. The energy that you purchase from MCE affects only the
generation portion of your monthly PGEtE bill.
With MCE, you can choose from two separate energy products called Deep Green and
Light Green.
Deep Green is 100% renewable and will come at a premium of $0.01 per kWh for
customers in Phase I of MCE.
Many customers who are part of Phase II have contacted MEA inquiring about their
ability to begin service under the 100% renewable energy Deep Green option in advance
of the Phase II rollout of the Marin Clean Energy program.
Early Phase II Deep Green Volunteers will pay a cost premium estimated at $10 per
month plus $0.01 per kWh used. The incremental cost would be higher for customers
that use more energy during the month as it would be $10 plus the amounts shown in
the following table:
Light Green is 25-50% renewable and mirrors PGEtE's rates.
The Marin Energy Authority Board of Directors has the ultimate responsibility for
setting the electric generation rates for the customers of Marin Clean Energy. The
primary objectives of the rate setting plan are to set rates that achieve rate stability,
equity among customers in each tariff, customer understanding, and revenue
sufficiency.
At the February 4, 2010 Board meeting, the Marin Energy Authority adopted the
following rate schedule for Marin Clean Energy customers.
Monthly KWH Usage
250
500
750
Deep Green Variable
Cost Premium
$2.50
$5.00
$7.50
Light Green is 25-50% renewable and mirrors PGEtE's rates.
The Marin Energy Authority Board of Directors has the ultimate responsibility for
setting the electric generation rates for the customers of Marin Clean Energy. The
primary objectives of the rate setting plan are to set rates that achieve rate stability,
equity among customers in each tariff, customer understanding, and revenue
sufficiency.
At the February 4, 2010 Board meeting, the Marin Energy Authority adopted the
following rate schedule for Marin Clean Energy customers.
MARIN ENERGY AUTHORITY
MARIN CLEAN ENERGY
2010 ELECTRIC RATES
PG&E EQUIVALENT SCHEDULE
MCE RATE SCHEDULE
UNIT/PERIOD
RATE
RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS
E-1, M, S. SR, T
RES -1
ENERGY CHARGE ($/K1NH)
TIER 1
0.04315
TIER 2
0.05206
TIER 3
0.13472
TIER 4
0.21112
TIER 5
0.25117
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH) `
(0.01446)
EL -1 (CARE)
RES-11-1-
ES-1-LENERGY
ENERGYCHARGE ($/KWH)
Baseline
0.05104
Above Baseline
0.06351
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH) `
(0.01446)
E-6
RES -6
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
Summer Peak
TIER 1
0.17156
TIER 2
0.18194
TIER 3
0.27810
TIER
0.36699
TIER 5
0.41356
Summer Part Peak
TIER 1
0.07390
TIER 2
0.08427
-
TIER 3
0.18044
TIER 4
0.26932
TIER 5
0.31590
Summer Off -Peak
TIER 1
0.03448
TIER 2
0.04486
TIER 3
0.14102
TIER 4
0.22991
TIER 5
0.27649
Winter Partial Peak
TIER 1
0.04483
TIER 2
0.05521
TIER 3
0.15137
TIER 4
0.24026
TIER 5
0.28684
Winter Off -Peak
TIER 1
0.03712
TIER 2
0.04750
TIER 3
0.14366
TIER 4
0.23255
TIER 5
0.27913
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH) `
(0.01446)
Page 1 of 8
Preliminary- MEA Energy Credit to equal the Power Charge Indifference Rate in effect as of commencement of service. April 1, 2010
MARIN ENERGY AUTHORITY
MARIN CLEAN ENERGY
2010 ELECTRIC RATES
PG&E EQUIVALENT SCHEDULE MCE RATE SCHEDULE UNIT/PERIOD
E-7 RES -7
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
Summer Peak
TIER 1
TIER 2
TIER 3
TIER 4
TIER 5
Summer Off -Peak
TIER 1
TIER 2
TIER 3
TIER 4
TIER 5
Winter Peak
TIER 1
TIER 2
TIER 3
TIER 4
TIER 5
Winter Off -Peak
TIER 1
TIER 2
TIER 3
TIER 4
TIER 5
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH) `
EL -7 (CARE) RES-7-1-
ENERGY
ES-7-LENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
Summer Peak
Summer Off -Peak
Winter Peak
Winter Off -Peak
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)'
E-8 RES -8
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
Summer
TIER 1
TIER 2
TIER 3
TIER 4
TIER 5
Winter
TIER 1
TIER 2
TIER 3
TIER 4
TIER 5
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWi)
RATE
0.17961
0.17961
0.28143
0.37556
0.42487
0.03365
0.03365
0.13547
0.22959
0.27891
0.05344
0.05344
0.15526
0.24939
0.29870
0.03578
0.03578
0.13759
0.23172
0.28103
(0.01446)
0.25792
0.05084
0.07892
0.05386
(0.01446)
0.07004
0.07004
0.19942
0.31905
0.38172
0.03208
0.03208
0.16147
0.28109
0.34377
(0.01446)
Page 2 of 8
Preliminary- MEA Energy Credit to equal the Power Charge Indifference Rate in effect as of commencement of service. April 1, 2010
MARIN ENERGY AUTHORITY
MARIN CLEAN ENERGY
2010 ELECTRIC RATES
PG&E EQUIVALENT SCHEDULE
NICE RATE SCHEDULE
UNIT/PERIOD
EL -8 (CARE)
RES -8-11
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
Summer
Winter
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)'
E-9
RES -9
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
Summer Peak
TIER 1
TIER 2
TIER 3
TIER 4
TIER 5
Summer Part Peak
TIER 1
TIER 2
TIER 3
TIER 4
TIER 5
Summer Off -Peak
TIER 1
TIER 2
TIER 3
TIER 4
TIER 5
Winter Partial Peak
TIER 1
TIER 2
TIER 3
TIER 4
TIER 5
Winter Off -Peak
TIER 1
TIER 2
TIER 3
TIER 4
TIER 5
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)"
RATE
0.13036
0.09646
(0.01446)
0.17254
0.17254
0.27435
0.36848
0.41780
0.04585
0.04585
0.14766
0.24179
0.29111
0.00758
0.00758
0.05118
0.05175
0.08616
0.04577
0.04577
0.14758
0.24171
0.29103
0.01342
0.01342
0.04837
0.04893
0.08334
(0.01446)
Page 3 of 8
Preliminary - MEA Energy Credit to equal the Power Charge Indifference Rate in effect as of commencement of service. April 1, 2010
MARIN ENERGY AUTHORITY
MARIN CLEAN ENERGY
2010 ELECTRIC RATES
PG&E EQUIVALENT SCHEDULE
MCE RATE SCHEDULE
UNIT/PERIOD
RATE
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND
GENERAL SERVICE CUSTOMER
A-1
COM -1
ENERGY CHARGE($/KWH)
SUMMER
0.10276
WINTER
0.06742
ENERGY CREDIT($/KWH)
(0.01516)
A-6
COM -6
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
SUMMER
PEAK
0.26649
PART -PEAK
0.10526
OFF-PEAK
0.05205
WINTER
PART -PEAK
0.08089
OFF-PEAK
0.05286
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)'
(0.01516)
A -10-A
COM -10-A
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
SUMMER
0.09814
WINTER
0.07102
DEMAND CHARGE ($/KW)
SUMMER MAX
3.08
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)'
(0.01542)
A -10-B
COM -10-B
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
SUMMER
PEAK
0.12102
PART -PEAK
0.09844
OFF-PEAK
0.08500
WINTER
PART -PEAK
0.07645
OFF-PEAK
0.06566
DEMAND CHARGE ($/KW)
SUMMER MAX
3.08
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)'
(0.01542)
Page 4 of 8
' Preliminary- MEA Energy Credit to equal the Power Charge Indifference Rate in effect as of commencement of service. April 1, 2010
MARIN ENERGY AUTHORITY
MARIN CLEAN ENERGY
2010 ELECTRIC RATES
PG&E EQUIVALENT SCHEDULE
MCE RATE SCHEDULE
UNIT/PERIOD
E-19-5, V
COM -19-S
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
SUMMER
PEAK
PART -PEAK
OFF-PEAK
WINTER
PART -PEAK
OFF-PEAK
DEMAND CHARGE ($/KW)
SUMMER
PEAK
PART -PEAK
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)
E -19-P, V
COM -19-P
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
SUMMER
PEAK
PART -PEAK
OFF-PEAK
WINTER
PART -PEAK
OFF-PEAK
DEMAND CHARGE ($/KW)
SUMMER
PEAK
PART -PEAK
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)
EA9-T, V
COM -19-T
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
SUMMER
PEAK
PART -PEAK
OFF-PEAK
WINTER
PART -PEAK
OFF-PEAK
DEMAND CHARGE ($/KW)
SUMMER
PEAK
PART -PEAK
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)
RATE
0.11805
0.07847
0.06172
0.06795
0.05848
9.15
1.95
(0.01602)
0.12088
0.07811
0.05905
0.06456
0.05497
8.80
1.89
(0.01602)
0.09217
0.07012
0.05694
0.06212
0.05302
9.16
2.07
(0.01602)
Page 5 of 8
Preliminary- MEA Energy Credit to equal the Power Charge Indifference Rate in effect as of commencement of service. April 1, 2010
MARIN ENERGY AUTHORITY
MARIN CLEAN ENERGY
2010 ELECTRIC RATES
PG&E EQUIVALENT SCHEDULE
MCE RATE SCHEDULE
UNIT/PERIOD
RATE
E-20-5
COM -20S
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
SUMMER
PEAK
0.11226.
PART -PEAK
0.07528
OFF-PEAK -
0.05945
WINTER
PART -PEAK
0.06542
OFF-PEAK
0.05636
DEMAND CHARGE ($/KW)
SUMMER
PEAK
8.74
PART -PEAK
1.79
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH) *
0.00367
E -20-P
COM -20-P
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
SUMMER
PEAK
0.12077
PART -PEAK
0.07813
OFF-PEAK
- 0.05922
WINTER
PART -PEAK
0.06467
OFF-PEAK
0.05517
DEMAND CHARGE ($/KW)
SUMMER
PEAK
9.46
PART -PEAK
2.07
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)
0.00348
E -20-T
COM -20-T
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
SUMMER
PEAK
0.08683
PART -PEAK
0.06635
OFF-PEAK
0.05413
WINTER
PART -PEAK
0.05893
OFF-PEAK
0.05050
DEMAND CHARGE ($/KW )
SUMMER
PEAK
11.12
PART -PEAK
2.49
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH) -
0.00311
Page 6 of 8
Preliminary - MEA Energy Credit to equal the Power Charge Indifference Rate in effect as of commencement of service. April 1, 2010
PG&E EQUIVALENT SCHEDUI
AGRICULTURAL CUSTOMERS
AG -1-A
AG -1-B
AG -4-A
AG -4-B
MARIN ENERGY AUTHORITY
MARIN CLEAN ENERGY
2010 ELECTRIC RATES
NICE RATE SCHEDULE UNIT/PERIOD
AGA -A
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
RATE
0.09498
0.07508
1.22
(0.01524)
0.09467
0.07257
(0.01524)
0.13873
0.05719
0.06089
0.05117
1.21
(0.01524)
0.10581
0.05933
0.05773
0.04040
2.08
2.15
(0.01524)
Page 7 of e
' Preliminary- MEA Energy Credit to equal the Power Charge Indifference Rate in effect as of commencement of service. April 1, 2010
SUMMER
WINTER
DEMAND CHARGE ($/KW)
SUMMER MAX
WINTER MAX
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)'
AGA B
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
SUMMER
WINTER
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)'
AG -4-A
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
SUMMER
PEAK
OFF-PEAK
WINTER
PART -PEAK
OFF-PEAK
CONNECTED LOAD ($/HP)
SUMMER
WINTER
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)'
AG -4-B
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
SUMMER
PEAK
OFF-PEAK
WINTER
PART -PEAK
OFF-PEAK
DEMAND CHARGE ($/KW)
SUMMER
MAX
PEAK
WINTER
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)'
RATE
0.09498
0.07508
1.22
(0.01524)
0.09467
0.07257
(0.01524)
0.13873
0.05719
0.06089
0.05117
1.21
(0.01524)
0.10581
0.05933
0.05773
0.04040
2.08
2.15
(0.01524)
Page 7 of e
' Preliminary- MEA Energy Credit to equal the Power Charge Indifference Rate in effect as of commencement of service. April 1, 2010
MARIN ENERGY AUTHORITY
MARIN CLEAN ENERGY
2010 ELECTRIC RATES
PG&E EQUIVALENT SCHEDULE
NICE RATE SCHEDULE
UNITIPERIOD
RATE
AG -5-A
AG -5-A
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
MER
PEAK
0.12992
OFF-PEAK
0.06174
WINTER
PART -PEAK
0.06491
OFF-PEAK
0.05464
CONNECTED LOAD ($/HP)
SUMMER
3.20
WINTER
-
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)
(0.01524)
AG -5-B
AG -6-13
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
SUMMER
PEAK
0.12283
OFF-PEAK
0.03892
NTER
PART -PEAK
0.05691
OFF-PEAK
0.03148
DEMAND CHARGE ($/KW)
SUMMER
MAX
3.92
PEAK
4.81
WINTER
-
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)'
(0.01524)
STREET AND OUTDOOR LIGHTING
LS -1, LS -2, LS -3, OL -i
SL -1
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
0.07427
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)'
(0.01929)
TG -1
TC -1
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH)
O.Ofi868
ENERGY CREDIT ($/KWH)'
(0.01516)
DEEP GREEN OPTION
Eligible customers electing the Deep Green service option will pay the applicable rate for the Light Green service option plus the Deep Green Energy Charge.
ENERGY CHARGE ($/KWH) 0.01000
Page 8 of 8
' Preliminary- MEA Energy Credit to equal the Power Charge Indifference Rate in effect as of commencement of service. April 1, 2010
z
O
F-
13-
O
Z
LU
W
Lr
U
a
W
W
0
W
U
LL
O
U
O
U
J
z
z
z
J
W
LL
Z
U)
LL
O
U
.s(
E
3 V
E c
E
a—
.fr
OL (p
R N z .di
N, o :
E 0 0 !R lY
U
0
7
(o
M
N
1
N
0
000000000eo00oo0000000000000000000e
r
W
M
r
0
V
O
fO
M
(O
V'
M
(O
(O
O
V
f`
V'
O
d'
O
O
(O
N
M
0
M
M
O
O
M
0
r
(O
W
W
0
N
0
M
M
M
O
f�
N
0
('-
R
tO
O
o
O
CA
fA
N
M
e
r
(O
(O
M
N
(O
N
W
co
V
M
d'
W
0
O
m
N
(O
a0
0
(O
N
M
O
M
0
co
(O
r
(D
0
O
O
M
O
w
0
r
M
O
N
V
0
co
(O
O
M
't
0
O
V
(O
n
C
0
O
N
M—
M
0
O
W
r
M
0
O
o0
M
O—
'-
0
co
N
V
N
N
M
N
O
M
Z
M
r
N
N
N
N
M
N
n
n
V
O
M
N
M
(O
M
N
o
M
([)
N
a
N
O
M
a
O
(O
O
M
—
o
N
OO
OD.
M.
C
O
N N
w IM
R,
r ®a
c j
Q
r
:
MM
MfR
(A
fAMMMMM(»
fR
fAM
(»
MM
MMM
MMM
MM
MM
M(»
(»
MM
M
MEH
O
O
Q'
W
N NL
W
WN
N
M
O
W
MM
O
O
O
t`
M
w
O
OOO
N
t`
r
O
in
O
N
W
7
O
V
M
M
M
M
N
N
M
N
N—M—
N
eD
MN
N
'
O'
M'
� C E
C
O
n
M
M
(V
O
£eco
w
W
MM(»(»
MMM
M(A
(»
(J?M
M
MM
M
MMM
U)
MMM
MM
MM
MMM
MM
M
Mi9
fA
M
O
O
O
M
V
r
7
O
00
(O
M
M
M
M
W
O
W
O
O
W
(O
(O
00
N
O. C
OOrMO
�
Z
(OO
�
OO
M(O7
(O7NrO
�-
rMMM
W
NM
r
O
M
M
N
O—
-OM
y
c
O
O
'Itw
r
M
M
O
CO
LiM
r
O
O
N
M
r
O
O
N
�
W
e0
O
(O
(Oar
N
N
N
N
�
—
—
N
d
c V
O
01
CO
aD
O
0p
d'
(O
W
N
N
N
N
n
M
W
(O
(O
(O
It
It
M
M
N
—
N
M
N
� O v
N
r
ti
G L
w
(O
LL
MMMMGo
61
(
fA
ER
fA
f961J
MM
M
M
MMM
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
MiA
E
mm
O
r
a
W
eO
N
M
O
(O
�
W
N
M
O
M
T
O
7
7
to
c �
V'
.-
M
r
W
(O
W
i�
d_
(n
(n
M
f\
W
N
N
(O
0
ap
.-
01
'cY
O
O
OD
W
CA
M
tO
a
M
(O
M
O
M
O
r
O
d'
'
tO
W
O
N
N
(")
O
W
M
O
M
O
M
f`
1,
O
M
O
N
O
O
f`
O
M
O
N
M
V
O
7
V
M
M
M
(O
N
M
N
N
N
cD
r-7
�
M
M
N
N
O
M
IL
a y.�`
O
n
M
M
N—
I
d
O O
N
N
O O
a
a.
)- m
LL
E
Y
LU
O
N
N
N
N
N
c
N
N
N
Y
Q.
O
U
U
U
(n
U
£
U
U
O
O
U
U
U
(.)
d
N
W
N
N
N
U)
N
>
>
>
>
N
W
Ui
06
06
�
06
EEE
JE
E
>
E
E
N
Y
w
Y
m
Y
m
Y
EpE
E
E
E
E
E
Eaoaaaaoo0a._o����a._ooa
Baa
Wmaa
mom
OLLULLLLLLaa'
LL
U
LL
U
0
aoo
a
(L
Q
0
L
LL
a
00-
acIDQ�D1D000
c
LU
E
3
U
w
U
o
c
c
y
N
c
c
U)
U
W
U
V
M
M
C
O
O
.V
N
O
N
c
J
2
G
O
.O-�
N
>
(n
U
01
C
N
E
+'
C
tl)
¢
E
N
to
C
N
N
`)
N
U
W
O
C
O
W
N
E
LY
C
E
p
U
E£`¢
R
U
U
Y
N
Y
N
p
LL
Q
V
c
Y
O
O
N
U
O
N
U
'E
in
L
U
2
0
0
C
co
W
N
M
M
a-
v
N
y
N
N
o"Za
lY
U
t`6
a)
U
E
ik
N
iko
N�
C
O
E
cC
ik
N
L
N
N
L
O
J
(0
l6
c
O
N
C
C
U
C
O
C
O
E
C
O
V
N
C
O
w
3
O
a
2
`
o
E
O
c
U�
O
O
U
N
C
N
0
N
U)
O
l6
l6
N
O
3
p
U
c�
'Y
J��
0
0`
J
Nx
f6
O
O
O
O
3
N
J
N
LY
CUD
U
Uva
-O
W
UA
U)
a)
N
.�.
U
N
r
U._
y
O
U
c
N
w
O
y
m
a
W
O
c
O
xiq
c
M
On
3
`)
O
N
N
m
w0
E
O
O
O
N
(6
l6
�)
L
Z
N(a
'L
N
N
N
U
'u.
l6
O
O
Z
-L
c
N
(6
()
O
Up
U
n_
0
(L
H
(n
a
i
—i
J
LL
a
a
a
a
LL
0)
2
o
L
L
x
M
LL
LL>
C�
m
W
2Ka(Y
LY
(Y
.....
LY
LYaLY
LY
„
...........
KKK
LY
KK
K
K
KK
Ktr
tY
tr
tY
trK2
rm
wUw(n(n(CO.rn(ncn(n(ncnw(n(now)(nww(n(0(000(nUwrn(nwwwrn(nwE-