Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCD 999 3rd Street - BioMarin R&D Buildings - Whistlestop Senior Center - Eden Senior Housing 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1980 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL APPROVING AN AMENDMENT (ZO18- 003) TO SAN RAFAEL MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 14.16.190.A (HEIGHT BONUS) TO ESTABLISH A NEW 20-FOOT HEIGHT BONUS FOR THE 999 3RD STREET PROPERTY WHEREAS, in 1992, the City of San Rafael adopted Section 14.16.190 of Title 14 (Zoning Ordinance) of the San Rafael Municipal Code (SRMC) via Ordinance No. 1625; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2018, BioMarin Pharmaceutical (BioMarin) and Whistlestop/Eden Housing submitted project applications to the City of San Rafael Community Development Department for a General Plan Amendment (GPA18-001), Planned Development (PD) Rezoning (ZC18-002), Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (ZO18-003), Development Agreement (DA19-001), Master Use Permit (UP18-034), Environmental and Design Review Permit (ED18-087), Small Subdivision (S18-001), and Sign Program Amendment (SP18006) for the development of two 72-foot tall, four-story Research and Development buildings and a 67- unit, 70-foot tall, six-story senior center and affordable senior housing building on a 133,099 sq. ft. parcel at 999 3rd Street; and WHEREAS, the maximum height bonus for development in the Second/Third Mixed Use (2/3MUE) District is 12 feet based on the provision of the following public amenities; a. Affordable housing, consistent with SRMC Section 14.16.030 (Affordable housing); b. Public parking, providing it is consistent with the downtown design guidelines; c. Skywalks over Second or Third Streets, with the approval of the traffic engineer, and the recommendation of the design review board; d. Mid-block passageways between Fourth Street and parking lots on Third Street, with the recommendation of the design review board that the design is attractive and safe; and WHEREAS, the project application for the total BioMarin development includes a request to amend SRMC Section 14.16.190 to increase the allowable maximum height bonus for the 118,099 sq. ft. BioMarin portion of the 999 3rd Street property from 12 feet to 20 feet based on the provision of one or more of the following public amenities: a. Affordable housing (minimum 60 units); b. Privately owned public plaza (5,000 sq. ft. or more in size); c. Community facility (e.g. senior center, 10,000 sq. ft. or more in size); d. Pedestrian crossing safety improvements at adjacent intersections; e. Donation of funds for development of bike lanes; and WHEREAS, the proposed request for additional height bonus requires an amendment to the General Plan (Exhibit 10 Height Bonus) and the City Council has approved that General Plan Amendment in conjunction with the review of the planning applications for the proposed project; and WHEREAS, following the initial filing of the BioMarin/Whistlestop/Eden Housing planning applications, the City commenced with environmental review of the project. Consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and the City of San Rafael Environmental Assessment Procedures Manual, the appropriate steps were followed to complete environmental review of the project, which included: a) the publication of a Notice of Preparation (NOP) in February 2019 for the purpose of scoping the topic areas of study for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report; b) the preparation and publication of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) in August 2019, which included a 45-day public review 2 process and Planning Commission public hearing for commenting on the DEIR; and c) the preparation of a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) by responding to all comments made and submitted on the DEIR; and WHEREAS, the FEIR assesses the environmental impacts of the proposed amendment to San Rafael General Plan 2020 to allow for the maximum Height Bonus for the subject property. The FEIR finds that the proposed amendment to the General Plan will not result in a significant impacts, resulting from the change in height bonus provisions and would not be in potential conflict with San Rafael General Plan 2020 Land Use Element Land Use Element Policies LU-23 (Land Use Map and Categories), LU-10 (Planned Development), LU-9 (Intensity of Nonresidential Development), LU-14 (Land Use Compatibility), Neighborhood Element Policies NH-15 (Downtown Vision), NH-16 (Economic Success), NH-38 (Lindaro Office District) and NH-8 (Parking), which are adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating the physical, environmental effect of new development; and WHEREAS, the FEIR states that there is a conflict with the San Rafael General Plan 2020 Land Use Element Policy LU-2 (Development Timing) and Circulation Element Policy C-5 (Traffic Level of Service), because of the significant and unavoidable traffic impacts to the local circulation network, which would result from the proposed project, however, these are not related to the additional height of the buildings, but from the intensity of the use; and WHEREAS, in considering the application to amend SRMC Section 14.16.190, the City Council has reviewed and considered the proposed project benefits against the unavoidable, adverse environmental effects from the impacts to the circulation network. By separate resolutions, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15063 and consistent with San Rafael General Plan 2020 Circulation Element Policy C-5D (Evaluation of Project Merits) and Program C-5c (Exception Review), the City Council has: 1) certified the FEIR; and 2) adopted CEQA Findings of Fact; and Statement of Overriding Considerations and approved an Exception to the Circulation Element Policy C-5 (Level of Service), and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) to ensure that required mitigation measures are incorporated into project action; and WHEREAS, on January 28, 2020, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project, including this Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (ZO18-003), along with a General Plan Amendment (GPA18-001), Planned Development (PD) Rezoning (ZC18- 002), Development Agreement (DA19-001), Master Use Permit (UP18-034), Environmental and Design Review Permit (ED18-087), Small Subdivision (S18-001) and Sign Program Amendment (SP18-18-006), accepting all oral and written public testimony and the written report of the Community Development Department Planning staff and closed said hearing on that date; and WHEREAS, on January 28, 2020, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 20- 04, recommending to the City Council approval of the proposed amendment to SRMC Section 14.16.190; and WHEREAS, on February 28, 2020, a Notice of Availability for the FEIR/Response to Comments was mailed to interested persons and property owners and occupants within 500 feet of the property and to all responsible, trustee and other public agencies that commented on the DEIR, informing them of the City Council hearing for final action. A Notice of Availability was also published in the Marin Independent Journal on Saturday, February 29, 2020 and the site was posted with public hearing signs; and 3 WHEREAS, on March 23, 2020, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to review the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and considered all oral and written public testimony and the written report of the Community Development Department; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2020, by adoption of separate two resolutions, the City Council certified the FEIR, adopted CEQA findings of fact, adopted a statement of overriding consideration and approved the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP); and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2020, the City Council, by adoption of separate Resolutions, approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA18-001), Use Permit (UP18-034), Environmental and Design Review Permit (ED18-087), Small Subdivision (S18-001), and Sign Program Amendment (SP18-006); and WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings, pursuant to SRMC Section 14.27.060 for adoption of the amendment to SRMC Section 14.16.190 set forth in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein by reference: 1. The proposed amendment would be generally consistent with the related elements, goals, policies or programs of the San Rafael General Plan 2020 in that: a. Although the proposed amendment conflicts with San Rafael General Plan 2020 Land Use Element Policy LU-2 (Development Timing) and Circulation Element Policy C-5 (Traffic Level of Service), which are adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating a physical, environmental effect associated with traffic , the Planning Commission has determined, through adoption of a separate resolution of CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Findings of Overriding Consideration, that the benefits of the General Plan amendment outweigh the unavoidable, adverse environmental effects of the action. These findings conclude that the amendment would be consistent with and implement Circulation Element Policy C-5D (Evaluation of Project Merits) and Program C-5c (Exception Review), which acknowledge that the City Council may approve an action that would exceed the LOS standards set by Policy C-5, if the City Council finds that the benefits of the project to the community outweigh the traffic impacts. The findings in the resolution approving the General Plan Amendment are reaffirmed herein to support this action to amend the San Rafael Zoning Ordinance. b. This Ordinance would be consistent with and implement San Rafael General Plan 2020 Neighborhood Element Program NH-40, which encourages the redevelopment of the project site with a mix of uses that would also extend the uses of the San Rafael Corporate Center. As drafted, overall, the amendment would be consistent with: a) Neighborhood Element Policy NH-40 (Second Third Mixed Use District) and NH-41 (Second Third Mixed Use District Design Considerations), by promoting a high quality mixed-use development in the downtown designated areas; b) Economic Vitality Element Policies EV-2 (Seek, Retain and Promote Businesses that Enhance San Rafael), EV-4 (Local Economic and Community Impacts), EV-8 (Diversity of our Economic Base), and EV-13 (Business Areas) by broadening, with limited application, the uses that are permitted in areas that are designated for general commercial and office land uses. 4 c. The public health, safety and general welfare are served by the adoption of the proposed amendment to San Rafael Municipal Code, which would modify the permitted maximum Height Bonus for the portion of the 999 3 rd Street property to be included in the newly modified San Rafael Corporate Center PD District (PD- 1936) in that: d. This Ordinance would be consistent with and implement San Rafael General Plan Land Use Element LU-9 (Intensity of Nonresidential Development), with an appropriate development intensity based on consistency with the following factors: site resources and constraints, traffic and access, potentially hazardous conditions, adequacy of infrastructure, and City design policies. e. This Ordinance would be consistent with and implement San Rafael General Plan Neighborhoods Policy NH-40 (Second Third Mixed Use District). Program NH-40, which is specific to the Second/Third Mixed Use District in the downtown area, as it encourages the redevelopment of the project site with a mix of uses that would also extend the uses of the SRCC. f. This Ordinance would permit a project that will provide desired public benefits and amenities, including: Affordable housing (minimum 60 units), a privately- owned public plaza (5,000 sq. ft. or more in size), a community facility (e.g. senior center, 10,000 sq. ft. or more in size), pedestrian crossing safety improvements at adjacent intersections, and donation of funds for development of bike lanes. These public benefits would be consistent with other public benefit requirements for height bonuses for developments in the downtown area. g. This Ordinance would not be growth inducing nor would it be precedent setting as the property and proposed square footage addition would be consistent with the development standards and land uses included in the existing San Rafael Corporate Center. The development of the proposed project at this location would be in the public interest in that it would further the policies of the General Plan by developing an infill property within the downtown area of San Rafael. In summary, as the proposed amendments would not result in similar development increases for other areas of San Rafael, the action would not be precedent setting or growth-inducing. 2. The public health, safety and general welfare are served by adoption of the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments, in that: a) an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and certified, consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and considered the proposed height bonus allowance, b) City department and regulatory agencies have been provided copies of plans and asked to provide input on the proposed project, including the amendment to the height bonus table; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: DIVISION 1. Findings The City Council of the City of San Rafael hereby determines and finds that all of the facts and statements contained in the recitals herein and the finding s of Planning Commission Resolution 20-05, adopted January 28, 2020, recommending to the City Council adoption of this Ordinance, are true and correct. 5 DIVISION 2. Amendment The City Council of the City of San Rafael hereby approves and adopts the amendments to Section 14.16.190 of SRMC Title 14 (Zoning Ordinance), as presented in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. DIVISION 3. Publication; Effective Date This Ordinance shall be published once, in full or in summary form, before its final passage, in a newspaper of general circulation, published, and circulated in the City of San Rafael, and shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. If published in summary form, the summary shall also be published within fifteen (15) days after the adoption, together with the names of those Councilmembers voting for or against same, in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of San Rafael, County of Marin, State of California. GARY O. PHILLIPS, Mayor ATTEST: LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk The foregoing Ordinance No. 1980 was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Rafael, held on the 23rd day of March 2020 and ordered passed to print by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmembers: Bushey, Colin, Gamblin, McCullough and Mayor Phillips NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None and will come up for adoption as an Ordinance of the City of San Rafael at a Regular Meeting of the Council to be held on the 6th day of April 2020. LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk Exhibit A-1 Exhibit A Amendment to San Rafael Municipal Code (SRMC) Title 14 – Zoning The following section of the San Rafael Municipal Code (SRMC) Title 14 – Zoning is hereby amended to provide a new maximum height bonus of 20 feet for the 999 3rd Street property, including public amenities, as shown with the new (underlined) and modified (strike thru), as follows Section 14.16.190.A – Height Bonus A. Downtown Height Bonuses. A height bonus may be granted by a use permit approved by the planning commission in the following downtown zoning districts. No more than one height bonus may be granted for a project. 1. In the Fourth Street retail core, a twelve-foot (12′) height bonus for any of the following: a. Affordable housing, consistent with Section 14.16.030 (Affordable housing); b. Public courtyards, plazas and/or passageways, with the recommendation of the design review board that the public improvements are consistent wit h downtown design guidelines; Public parking, providing it is not facing Fourth Street and it is consistent with the downtown design guidelines. 2. In the Lindaro district, on lots south of Second Street and fronting Lindaro Street, a twenty-four-foot (24′) height bonus for any of the following: a. Park area adjacent to Mahon Creek, accessible to the public and maintained by the property owner; b. Community facility, ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more in size. The facility must be available to the public for cultural and community events, and maintained and operated by the property owner. 3. In the Second/Third mixed use east district, a twelve-foot (12′) height bonus for any of the following: a. Affordable housing, consistent with Section 14.16.030 (Affordable housing); b. Public parking, providing it is consistent with the downtown design guidelines; c. Skywalks over Second or Third Streets, with the approval of the traffic engineer, and the recommendation of the design review board; d. Mid-block passageways between Fourth Street and parking lots on Third Street, with the recommendation of the design review board that the design is attractive and safe. 4. On the 999 3rd Street Property, a twenty-foot (20’) height bonus for any of the following: a. Affordable housing (minimum 60 units) b. Privately owned public plaza (5,000 sq. ft. or more in size) c. Community facility (e.g. senior center, 10,000 sq. ft. or more in size) d. Pedestrian crossing safety improvements at adjacent intersections e. Donation of funds for development of bike lanes; 4.5. In the West End Village, a six-foot (6′) height bonus for any of the following: a. Affordable housing, consistent with Section 14.16.030 (Affordable housing); b. Public parking, providing it is consistent with the downtown design guidelines; Exhibit A-2 c. Public passageways, with the recommendation of the design review board that the public passageway serves an important public purpose and is attractive and safe. 5.6. In the Second/Third mixed use west district, on lots located on the north side of Third Street and east of C Street, an eighteen-foot (18′) height bonus for the following: a. Public parking, providing it is consistent with the downtown design guidelines. **No changes to Sections B OR C OF SRMC 14.16.190** Legal No. Marin Independent Journal 4000 Civic Center Drive, Suite 301 San Rafael, CA 94903 415-382-7335 legals@marinij.com I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the MARIN INDEPENDENT JOURNAL, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published daily in the County of Marin, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Marin, State of California, under date of FEBRUARY 7, 1955, CASE NUMBER 25566; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 03/28/2020 I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated this 30th day of March, 2020. PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Marin Signature PROOF OF PUBLICATION 0006474249 2070419 CITY OF SAN RAFAEL CITY OF SAN RAFAEL CITY CLERK, ROOM 209 1400 FIFTH AVENUE, SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901 SAN RAFAEL, CA 94915-1560 r.BP7-11/10/16 1 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 1980 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL APPROVING AN AMENDMENT (ZOlB-003) TO SAN RAFAEL MUNICI PAL CODE SECTION 14.16.190.A (HEIGHT BONUS) TO ESTABLISH A NEW 20-FOOT HEIGHT BONUS FOR THE 999 3RD STREET PROPERTY This Summary concerns a proposed Ordinance of the City Counc il of the City of San Rafael, designated as Ord inance No. 1980, which wi ll amend the City of San Rafael Zoning Ordi- nance , Title 14 of the San Rafael Municipal Code, as detailed in the complete t ext of Ordi- nance No. 1980. Ordinance No. 1980 is sched- uled for adoption by the San Rafae l City Coun- ci l at its regular meeting of Apri l 6, 2020. Th e City Clerk has been directed to publish this Summary pursuant to City Charter and Califor- nia Government Code section 36933(c)(l). SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE This Ordinance amends the Zoning Ordinance of the Cit y of San Rafael by amending Section 14.16.190.A (Height Bonus) to establish a new 20 ft height bonus wi th projects that provide certain spec ified ame nities, which allows the Bi oMarin project to build 2 buildings upto a 72 ft tall based on the project providi ng : 1) Af- fordable hous in g. 2) Privately owned public plaza, 3) Community facility, 4) Pedestrian crossi ng safety improvements at adjace nt in- tersections and 5) Donation of funds for devel- opme nt of bike lanes. For a complet e copy of the text of the Ordi- nance ame nding the Municipal Code, please co ntact the City Clerk at (415) 485-3066 or the Co mmunity Develop ment Department, Plan- ning Di vision at (415) 485 -3085. Copies of the Ordin ance co ntai nin g this Municipal Code ame ndment are also available for public re- view by contacti ng the City Clerk's office by email to Lindsay.lara@cityofsan rafael.org LINDSAY LARA, San Rafael City Clerk Dat ed: 03 /26/2020 No. 349 March 28, 2020 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1981 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL ADOPTING AN AMENDED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) REZONING (ZC18-002) FOR THE SAN RAFAEL CORPORATE CENTER (SRCC) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING THE RESCISSION OF THE PD 1936 DISTRICT, BY ADOPTION OF A NEW PD DISTRICT TO: 1) ALLOW EXPANSION OF THE CURRENT SRCC PD DISTRICT BY INCORPORATING THE 118,099 SQ. FT. OF THE 999 3RD STREET PROPERTY INTO THE BOUNDARIES; AND 2) UPDATE PD DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO INCORPORATE REVISED PARKING STANDARDS AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO 72-FOOT TALL, FOUR-STORY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BUILDINGS (APN 011-265-01 AND 013-021-34, 35, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 & 55,) WHEREAS, in February 1998, the San Rafael City Council adopted a Planned Development District (PD-1721) approving a Master Plan for the development of a 406,000 square foot office park on a 15.54-acre site located south of Second Street in Downtown San Rafael (the “SRCC Property”). The PD-1721 District established zoning and standards for development of the subject property with the San Rafael Corporate Center office park (SRCC), consisting of five buildings (totaling 406,000 square feet), two parking structures, surface parking, campus landscaping and publicly accessible park area along Mahon Creek; and WHEREAS, in August 2000, the City Council adopted an amendment to the Planned Development (PD-1721) District to approve changes in the zoning district development standards in order to accommodate multi-tenant use of the SRCC. The amended Planned Development District was rezoned to PD-1754; and WHEREAS, in October 2011, the City Council adopted an amendment to the Planned Development (PD-1754) District to expand the allowed land uses for the SRCC to include medical use and research and development and allowed the adopted parking standard of 3.3 parking spaces per 1,000 in the Master Plan (instead of 4.4 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. for medical office). The amended Planned Development District was rezoned to PD-1901; and WHEREAS, in October 2015, the City Council adopted an amendment to the Planned Development (PD-1901) District approving a 72,396 square foot, 54-foot tall, four-story office building at 755 Lindaro Street on the western parcel surface parking lot (Parcel 1) and a six story expansion of the previously approved and built parking structure at 788 Lincoln Ave. (Parcel 8) of the SRCC. The build-out of the approved campus totals 478,396 sq. ft. allowed by the PD 1936. The amended Planned Development District, PD-1936, is the zoning currently governing the SRCC Property; and WHEREAS, between 2000 and today, the SRCC Property has been developed in various phases. The last office building (5th of 6 entitled) and the second parking garage approved were constructed in 2015-2016 under the terms of the Planned Development (PD- 1901) District. The build-out of the approved campus totals 400,700 sq. ft., which is 5,300 sq. ft. less than the 406,000 sq. ft. allowed by the PD 1901; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2018, BioMarin Pharmaceutical (BioMarin) submitted project applications to the City of San Rafael Community Development Department for a General Plan Amendment (GPA18-001), Planned Development (PD) Rezoning (ZC18-002), Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (ZO18-003), Development Agreement (DA19-001), Master Use Permit (UP18-034), Environmental and Design Review Permit (ED18-087), Small 2 Subdivision (S18-001), and Sign Program Amendment (SP18-006) for the development of two 72-foot tall, four-story Research and Development buildings for BioMarin and a 67-unit, 70-foot tall, six-story senior center and affordable senior housing building for Whistlestop/EDEN Housing on a 133,099 sq. ft. parcel at 999 3rd Street (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the total development for BioMarin includes a request to incorporate 118,099 square feet of the 999 3rd Street property into the existing SRCC Property’s PD District. The total site area of the proposed campus would be 795,021 sq. ft.; and WHEREAS, the application to incorporate the portion of 999 3rd Street into the SRCC campus and development of the two new buildings at 999 3rd Street, create a blended FAR amongst all SRCC properties, and use a shared parking arrangement requires an Amendment to the PD-1936 District; and WHEREAS, on March 12, 2019, the Planning Commission held an appropriately noticed public scoping hearing on the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to assess the impacts of the Project. The Planning Commission directed staff to prepare an EIR for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) to address the following issues, Aesthetics, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Noise, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Services, Utilities, and Project Alternatives; and WHEREAS, the DEIR was completed and a Notice of Completion (NOC) was filed and the DEIR made available and circulated for a 45-day public comment period, beginning on August 9, 2019 and closing on September 23, 2019; and WHEREAS, on September 24, 2019, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to accept comments on the DEIR and directed staff to prepare a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR); and WHEREAS, the Final EIR was prepared and released for public review on January 10, 2020; and WHEREAS, on January 28, 2020, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project, including this Planned Development Rezoning (ZC18-002), along with a General Plan Amendment (GPA18-001), Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (ZO18-003), Development Agreement (DA19-001), Master Use Permit (UP18-034), Environmental and Design Review Permit (ED18-087), Small Subdivision (S18-001) and Sign Program Amendment (SP18-18-006), accepting all oral and written public testimony and the written report of the Community Development Department Planning staff; and WHEREAS, on January 28, 2020, the Planning Commission considered the responses to comments contained in the FEIR and recommended to the City Council, by Resolution No. 20-01, certification of the Final EIR in that it complies with all requirements of CEQA; and WHEREAS, on January 28, 2020, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 20- 05, recommending to the City Council approval of the proposed Planned Development Rezoning; and 3 WHEREAS, on February 28, 2020, a Notice of Availability for the FEIR/Response to Comments was mailed to interested persons and property owners and occupants within 500 feet of the property and to all responsible, trustee and other public agencies that commented on the DEIR, informing them of the City Council hearing for final action. A Notice of Availability was also published in the Marin Independent Journal on Saturday, February 29, 2020 and the site was posted with public hearing signs; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2020, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to review the application to amend the PD-1936 Zoning District and considered all oral and written public testimony and the written report of the Community Development Department; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2020, by adoption of separate two resolutions, the City Council certified the FEIR for the Project, adopted CEQA findings of fact, adopted a statement of overriding consideration and approved the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP); and WHEREAS, as required by San Rafael Municipal Code (SRMC) Sections 14.07.090 and 14.27.060, in support of amending the Zoning Ordinance to rescind the existing Planned Development (PD) District (PD-1936) and Second/Third Mixed Use East (2/3 MUE) District, as shown on the map contained in Exhibit “B” and further described in Exhibit “C,” and to establish a new PD District as outlined in Exhibit “A” (San Rafael Corporate Center Master Plan), which exhibits are attached and incorporated herein by reference, the City Council makes the following findings: 1. As proposed and conditioned, approval of this PD Amendment to expand the allowable uses to include an additional 207,000 square feet of laboratory and general office uses in two 72-foot tall, four-story buildings, on 118,099 square feet of 999 3rd Street, would be consistent with the applicable goals and policies of the San Rafael General Plan 2020 and in conformance with the provisions of the PD-1936 District, as amended. Specifically: a. As proposed, the laboratory and office land uses are consistent with General Plan Land Use Element Policies LU-23 (Land Use Map and Categories), LU-10 (i), LU-9 (Intensity of Nonresidential Development), LU-12 (Building Heights), LU-14 (Land Use Compatibility) in that these uses would be: allowable under the adopted Lindaro Office land use designation; compatible with the current land uses allowed under the PD-1936 District adopted for this site; and compatible with existing land uses found in the surrounding area. In addition, by separate action, the City Council has approved a height bonus and an accompanying General Plan amendment. b. Although the proposed Project will conflict with Circulation Element Policies C-5 (Traffic Level of Service Standards), the City Council has adopted by separate Resolution a waiver to the LOS standards for this Project consistent with C-5e, based on a finding that the benefits of the Project outweigh the impacts. c. The Project would be consistent with C-7 (Circulation Improvements Funding) and C- 12 (Transportation Demand Management) in that the office use component would be subject to the adopted citywide traffic mitigation fees which would be used to fund long-term transportation improvements; and the Project would not change the current City requirement and obligation of the office park owner to implement transportation demand measures such as encouraging tenants, through incentives, to carpool and use public transit. 4 d. As proposed, the laboratory and office land uses would be consistent with General Plan Neighborhood Element Policies NH-15 (Downtown Vision), NH-16 (Economic Success), NH-38 (Lindaro Office District) and NH-8 (Parking) in that they would: facilitate additional employment and future economic success in the Downtown area; promote build-out of the San Rafael Corporate Center project by allowing a land use that is appropriate and marketable; allow compatible land uses that would fill current and long-term projected vacancies in general and administrative office space; and promote a reasonable reduction in required parking supported by the Project’s proximity to Downtown, the Bettini Transit Center and the SMART rail stations. e. As proposed, the laboratory and office land uses would be consistent with the General Plan Community Design Element Policy CD-21(Parking lot landscaping) in that: the uses proposed will have an approved landscaping plan that will provide shade cover and adequate screening of vehicles within parking lot areas. f. As proposed, the laboratory and office land uses would be consistent with the General Plan Sustainability Element Policies SU-1 (Land Use) and SU-2 (Promote Alternative Transportation), and the adopted Climate Change Action Plan in that: the uses are proposed within an existing and approved development office park that is close to public transit and Downtown; the project proposes a reduction in the amount of required parking for the medical use component, thus reducing thermal gain and shared parking; and the additional mix in land uses would facilitate the implementation of transportation demand measures such as encouraging tenants, through incentives, to carpool and use public transit. g. The approval of additional laboratory and office land uses would be consistent with Our Vision of Downtown San Rafael in that it would further promote new businesses and employment in the Downtown area. h. The approval of laboratory and office land uses would be consistent with the PD- District, as amended by this PD rezoning. 2. The proposed additional laboratory and office uses would not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the residents or community in that: a. These uses would be compatible with the currently approved and operating administrative, laboratory, and general office uses. These uses would be compatible with surrounding and immediate land uses and development. b. These uses would be consistent and not in conflict with the deed restriction recorded for the San Rafael Corporate Center, which permits commercial and office land uses but prohibits use and development with residential and day care land uses. No residential uses would be included on the 118,099 sq. ft. land area addition to the San Rafael Corporate Center. c. The addition of these land uses would realize the development of a vacant downtown parcel that is contemplated for laboratory and general office uses. The Corporate Center is adequately served by local facilities and utilities and the proposed land uses would be an extension of the ongoing operations. 3. The proposed addition of laboratory and general office land uses will result in a reduction in parking ratio requirements currently adopted in the San Rafael Corporate Center Master Plan (3.3 spaces/1,000 square feet). The initial approval of the San Rafael Corporate Center found that this development has been designed to adequately address the automobile, bicycle and pedestrian traffic systems. Consistent with SRMC Section 5 14.18.040B, the Project has been studied for parking needs for laboratory, office, and amenities uses at this location finding that the use of the proposed parking standard for the office park is reasonable, appropriate and adequate in that: a. The proposed parking standard of 3.0 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross square feet (GSF) for office, 1.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of GSF for laboratory/research and development, and 1.0 spaces per 1,000 GSF of amenities is equitable and logical based on the parking study demand and usage on the existing BioMarin campus and studies and usage for other biotech campuses around the Bay Area as documented in the parking demand study for the proposed project. b. The approvals and agreements established for the San Rafael Corporate Center will require a parking contingency plan should the office park be used for multi-tenants or converted from laboratory land uses. The project owner will be required to demonstrate available parking upon sale of the property or conversion from BioMarin (a single tenant) to multi-tenant uses. c. The San Rafael Corporate Center is in immediate proximity to t he Bettini Transit Center (major transit hub for Marin County) and the Downtown San Rafael SMART rail station. The immediate access to mass transit reduces parking demand, which appropriately supports lower parking standards. 4. The proposed uses are found to be appropriate in area, location and overall planning for the purpose intended, and the design and development standards create a non - residential environment of sustained desirability and stability given that the Project is located on a centralized , downtown, vacant, infill-parcel contemplated for development in the General Plan along a major arterial road. The proposed uses are consistent with the surrounding development and the existing BioMarin campus at the San Rafael Corporate Center. The proposed Project uses high quality design materials and has been reviewed by the Design Review Board for recommendation of approval. The proposed Project will allow for growth of a major employer in the downtown area. 5. The applicant demonstrates that public fac ilities are provided to serve the anticipated population as documented in the Final EIR for the proposed Project and based on review by City departments for Code consistency regarding sewer, water, and other utilities. The proposed project is located in the downtown area of San Rafael where existing infrastructure is already in place to serve the Project site. 6. The development is improved by deviations from typical zoning ordinance property development and parking standards given that it functions as a campus for a large biotechnology company and promotes high quality design, including clustering, landscaping, and parking sharing across the campus, and allows for flexibility of height and FAR standards. 7. The auto, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic system is adequately designed for circulation needs and public safety and emergency vehicle access is provided to serve the proposed development based on review by City departments including Police and Fire. The proposed access points have been reviewed by City d epartments for Code consistency. Improvements to the bike and pedestrian networks in the surrounding area are included as part of the Project. Although the Project deviates from Level of Service standards as documented by the Final EIR for the proposal, th e project has been approved by separate actions, including a Exception to LOS standards and a 6 statement of overriding considerations for circulation impacts which remain significant and unavoidable impacts . NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: DIVISION 1. Amendment of Map. The Zoning Map of the City of San Rafael, California, adopted by reference by Section 14.01.020 of the San Rafael Municipal Code is amended by reclassifying the following real property from PD-1936 (Planned Development District 1936) and Second/Third Mixed Use East (2/3MUE) District to PD (Planned Development Ordinance No. District. Said property so reclassified is located at 999 3rd Street (portion of), 750, 770, 775 and 790 Lindaro Street and 781, 788 and 791 Lincoln Avenue, designated as County Assessor’s Parcel No’s (APN): 011-265-01 (portion of) and 013-021-34, -35, -50, -51, -52, -53, -54 & -55, as shown on the map attached as Exhibit “B” and described in Exhibit “C”, which are attached and incorporated by reference. DIVISION 2. Conditions. Any development of this property shall be subject to the conditions outlined Exhibit “A”, the San Rafael Corporate Center Master Plan, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. DIVISION 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase be declared invalid. DIVISION 4. Publication; Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be published once, in full or in summary form, before its final passage, in a newspaper of general circulation, published, and circulated in the City of San Rafael, and shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. If published in summary form, the summary shall also be published within fifteen (15) days after the adoption, together with the names of those Councilmembers voting for or against same, in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of San Rafael, County of Marin, State of California. 7 _____ GARY O. PHILLIPS, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________ LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk The foregoing Ordinance No. 1981 was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Rafael, held on the 23rd day of March 2020 and ordered passed to print by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Bushey, Colin, Gamblin, McCullough and Mayor Phillips NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None and will come up for adoption as an Ordinance of the City of San Rafael at a Regular Meeting of the City Council to be held on the 6th day of April 2020. __________ LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk Exhibit A: Development Standards Exhibit B: PD Map Exhibit C: Property Description (Meets & Bounds) Exhibit A-1 Exhibit A San Rafael Corporate Center Master Plan (Formerly Ordinance 1721, 1754, 1901, and 1936 Fair, Isaac Office Park Master Plan) (ZC18-002) INTENT The San Rafael Corporate Center (formerly Fair, Isaac Office Park and currently known as BioMarin San Rafael Campus) Master Plan is based on the plans (Development Plan) approved for the Environmental and Design Review Permit (ED97-24, ED14-097 and ED18-087), Master Use Permit (UP14-052 and UP18-034) and Tentative Maps (TS97-1 and S18-001), approved by the City Council on February 17, 1998, August 7, 2000, December 5, 2011, October 19, 2015, and March 16, 2020. LAND USES This office park permits a maximum of 715,500 sq. ft. of building area within 8 buildings approved for the following uses: administrative office, general office, research/development uses, an d accessory uses and parking. 1. Administrative and General Office Use. Administrative and general office uses as defined by San Rafael Municipal Code Title 19 (Zoning). 2. Research and Development Use. Research and development use is defined as a use engaged in scientific, medical or technological research with limited product testing and production. This use excludes full production of industrial type manufacturing and generally operates similar to and characteristic of low-intensity, general office use. Medical laboratories established for research (as opposed to labs providing testing services for patients/visitors) would be defined as a research and development use. 3. Uses determined to be incidental or accessory to the above-listed land uses shall be permitted, as determined to be appropriate by the Community Development Director. In addition to the above buildings, the office park permits accessory parking structures to support the proposed development. Requirements and conditions for all uses in the office park shall be consistent with Master Use Permit UP14-052 and UP19-034. Residential and day care land uses are prohibited by recorded deed restriction. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The following standards shall apply to all development of the San Rafael Corporate Center (formerly Fair, Isaac Office Park and currently known as BioMarin San Rafael Campus): 1. Maximum floor area ratio: 0.90 blended maximum floor area ratio, per Development Plan approved under the office park Master Use Permit (UP18-034) and Environmental and Design Review Permit (ED18-087). 2. Building Height: Proposed buildings - Maximum 54 feet, plus an 20-foot building height bonus for the two new buildings at 999 3rd St, based on Exhibit A-2 provision of public benefit as addressed below.. Existing Buildings - Maximum 54 feet plus a 24 foot height bonus previously granted by City for existing buildings within the campus (750 Lindaro St, 770 Lindaro St, 790 Lindaro St and 791 Lincoln Ave on the Central Parcel). Master Use Permit (UP14-052) (applicable to the Original SRC Property in the Lindaro Office land use district) and Environmental and Design Review Permit (ED14-097), as shown in General Plan Exhibit 10. The building height bonuses requires public benefit provisions as addressed below. 3. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be consistent with the Development Plan approved under the office park Environmental and Design Review Permits (ED14-097 and ED18-087). 4. On-site Parking:  3.0 parking spaces per 1,000 gross square feet of office area,  1.5 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet of research/development area, and  1.0 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet of amenity area. Compliance with and monitoring of on-site parking shall be enforced through the conditions of the approval required by the office park Master Use Permit (UP14-097 and UP18-034). Parking Contingency: BioMarin will incorporate the following provisions into an enforceable deed restriction for the entire project site, Western parcels, Central parcels, Eastern Parcel and northern Parcel (except the portion transferred to Whistlestop/Eden Housing): a. Changes in tenancy or use (type of use of change to multiple tenants, rather than single tenant), expansion of use(s), or expansion of floor area that create a parking demand that is more than five (5) percent greater than the number of required parking spaces approved under the current Planned Development (PD) District shall provide additional automobile parking, bicycle parking, and loading space as required by this Planned Development (PD) District and/or demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City that an enhanced Transportation Demand Management Program will meet the increased parking demand. b. Existing parking shall be maintained, but may be replaced in a reconstructed parking facility. c. A change in occupancy is not considered a change in use if the parking demand of the new occupant is essentially the same as that for the occupant approved with Planned Development (PD) District). Exhibit A-3 5. Building Coverage Building coverage shall be consistent with the Developmen t Plan approved under the office park Environmental and Design Review Permit (ED14-097 and ED18-087). 6. Public Benefits: The existing SRCC development received height bonus for four (4) of the buildings noted above in exchange for certain public benefits, including provision of a privately maintained park with public access adjacent to Mahon Creek and conference/meeting room available to the public. (UP14-052) In addition for the new development of the three buildings (755 Lindaro, and two buildings at 999 3rd St), subdivision and transfer of 15,000 sq ft of land to Whistlestop at the 999 3 rd St site, a 6,000 sq ft “front porch” plaza open to the public and 3,000 sq ft retail space are to be provided in the 999 3 rd St building as required by the Development agreement set forth in the office park Use Permit (UP18-034). Other public benefits required for the Development Agreement, 18 ft height bonus for the two buildings at 999 3rd St, Statement of Overriding Considerations to CEQA Impacts are required as described in DA19-001 7. Development Phasing The three unbuilt buildings and expansion of the Lincoln Ave garage are to be phased within the 10-year term of the Development Agreement (DA). See DA19-001 and UP18-034. 8. Park Facility The office park development shall provide a privately maintained park with public access adjacent to Mahon Creek as set forth in the office park Use Permit (UP14-052 and UP18-034) 9. Minor Additions/ Accessory Structures Minor accessory structures or minor additions to the building that are determined to be accessory to the primary use and minimal in impact as determined by the Community Development Director, may be considered through review and approval of a Environmental and Design Review Permit, without an amendment to the PD District. DESIGN STANDARDS All buildings, structures, site improvements, landscaping, parking and exterior lighting shall be consistent with the Development Plan and conditions of approval for the office park Environmental and Design Review Permit.  ED14-097 and ED17-057 shall govern the new building design at 755 Lindaro St and the expansion to the Lincoln Ave parking garage; and  ED18-087 shall govern the design of the two new buildings at 999 3 rd St. Exhibit A-4 TERM This PD District and project approvals include a Development Agreement, as authorized by the California Government Code Section 65864 et seq., therefore this PD shall be approved for the term as defined by the Development Agreement, as long as there is compliance with all requirements and obligations of the Development Agreement. Exhibit B- 1 Exhibit B PD Boundary Map Exhibit C-1 Exhibit C Legal Description "Western Parcel" (APN 013-012-38 AND 39) Reference PARCEL TWO A portion of that certain parcel of land described in the deed from F. M. Neely and Sara Neely, his wife, to PG&E recorded December 12, 1922 in Volume 11 of Official Records at page 209, Marin County Records and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the southerly boundary line of the city street known as Second Street, with the westerly boundary line of the city street known as Lindaro Street and running thence along said westerly boundary: (1) south 06°45'00" west 299.22 feet; thence (2) south 08°53 '00" west 405.54 feet to a point in the northerly boundary line of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad Right of Way; thence along said northerly boundary line (3) north 54°38'00" west 396.88 feet; thence leaving said northerly boundary line (4) north 06°38'05" east 238.95 feet; thence (5) south 83°33'00" east 241.53 feet to a point herein for convenience called Point "A"; thence (6) north 06°38'05" east 273.54 feet to a point in the southerly boundary line of said Second Street, thence running along said southerly boundary line. (7) south 83°33'00" east 123.00 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. The bearings used are based on the Record of Survey filed for record May 10, 1985 in Book 20 of Surveys at page 47, Marin County Records. Reserving therefrom the following easements over and across those certain portions of the Parcel Two: 1. The "Exclusive Gas Meter Easement"; 2. The "Nonexclusive Gas Meter Easement"; 3. The "West Parcel Slurry Wall Easement"; 4. The "Area SA Extraction Trench Easement"; 5. The "Area SB Extraction Trench Easement"; and 6. The "West Parcel Electric Facilities Easement"; which are more particularly described as follows: Exclusive Gas Meter Easement Exhibit C-2 Beginning at a point in the easterly boundary line of the parcel of land hereinbefore described and designated PARCEL TWO, being also the westerly boundary line of said Lindaro Street, from which the southeast comer of said PARCEL TWO bears south 08°53'00" west 329.67 feet; thence leaving said easterly boundary line: (1) north 81°07'00" west 30.00 feet; thence (2) north 08°53'00" east 30.00 feet; thence (3) south 81°07'00" east 30.00 feet to a point in said easterly boundary; thence along said easterly boundary line (4) south 08°53'00" west 30.00 feet to the point of beginning. Nonexclusive Gas Meter Easement Beginning at the southwest comer of the parcel of land hereinbefore described and designated Exclusive Gas Meter Easement and running thence (1) north 81°07'00" west 20.00 feet; thence (2) north 08°53 '00" east 50.00 feet; thence (3) south 81 °07'00" east 50.00 feet; more or less, to a point in the easterly boundary line of said PARCEL TWO, being also the westerly boundary line of said Lindaro Street; thence along said easterly boundary line. (4) south 08°53 '00" west 20.00 feet to the northeast corner of said Exclusive Gas Meter Easement; thence along the northerly boundary line of said Exclusive Gas Meter Easement (5) north 81°07'00" west 30.00 feet to the northwest corner of said Exclusive Gas Meter Easement; thence along the westerly boundary line of said Exclusive Gas Meter Easement (6) south 08°53 '00" west 30.00 feet to the point of beginning. West Parcel Slurry Wall Easement A strip of land of the uniform width of 20 feet extending from the general northerly boundary line of said PARCEL TWO, southerly to the southwesterly boundary line of said PARCEL TWO and lying 10 feet on each side of the line described as follows: Beginning at a point in the general northerly boundary line of said PARCEL TWO, from which said Point "A" bears south 83°33'00" east 216.93 feet; thence leaving said general northerly boundary line (1) south 06°29'15" west 206.97 feet; thence (2) on a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 100.00 feet and tangent at the northerly terminus thereof to the preceding course, an arc distance of 5-8.23 feet, more or less, to a point in the southwesterly boundary line of said PARCEL TWO. Area SA Extraction Trench Easement Beginning at said Point "A" and running thence along the general westerly boundary line of said PARCEL TWO (1) north 06°38'05" east 273.54 feet Exhibit C-3 to a point in the northerly boundary line of said PARCEL TWO, being also the southerly boundary line of said Second Street, thence along said northerly boundary line (2) south 83°33'00" east 19.63 feet; thence leaving said northerly boundary line (3) south 05°41 '35" west 457.82 feet; thence (4) north 84°18'25" west 27.16 feet; more or less, to a point in the southerly prolongation of the general westerly boundary line of said PARCEL TWO; thence (7) north 06°38'05" east 184.60 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Area 5B Extraction Trench Easement A strip of land of the uniform width of 16 feet extending westerly from the easterly boundary of said PARCEL TWO, and lying 8 feet on each side of the line described as follows: Beginning at a point in the easterly boundary line of said PARCEL TWO, being also the westerly boundary line of said Lindaro Street, from which the southeast comer of PARCEL TWO bears south 08°53 '00" west 157.56 feet; thence leaving said easterly boundary line (1) north 80°40'14" west 135.97 feet to a point within the boundary lines of PARCEL TWO. West Parcel Electric Facilities Easement and the Substation Access Easement That portion of said PARCEL TWO lying westerly and southwesterly of a line described as follows: Beginning at said Point "A" and running thence along the southerly prolongation of the general westerly boundary line of said PARCEL TWO (1) south 06°38'05" west 269.32 feet; thence (2) south 54°38'001 east 125.95 feet, more or less, to a point in the easterly boundary line of said PARCEL TWO. Exhibit C-4 "CENTRAL PARCEL" (APN 013-021-51, 52, 53, 54 AND 55) Reference: PARCEL ONE The 8.280 acre parcel of land as shown upon the Record of Survey filed for record May 10, 1985 in Book 20 of Surveys at page 47, Marin County Records. Reserving therefrom the following easements over and across those certain portions of the Parcel One: A. The "Central Parcel Slurry Wall Easement"; B. The "Central Parcel Extraction Trench Easement"; and C. The "Central Parcel Electric Facilities Easement"; which are more particularly described as follows: Central Parcel Slurry Wall Easement A strip of land of the uniform width of 20 feet extending from the westerly boundary line of the parcel of land hereinbefore described and designated PARCEL ONE easterly and northerly to the northerly boundary line of said PARCEL ONE and lying 10 feet on each side of the line described as follows: Beginning at a point in the westerly boundary line of said PARCEL ONE, from which a rebar and cap stamped "LS 4545", herein for convenience called Point "B", accepted as marking the northeasterly terminus of a course in the westerly boundary line of the 8.280 acre parcel of land as shown upon said Record of Survey filed for record May 10, 1985, which course as shown upon said map has a bearing of S8°53' wand a length of 421.24 feet, bears north 08°53 '00" east 364.35 feet; thence leaving said westerly boundary line• (1) south 76°44'52" east 70.89 feet; thence (2) south 84°17'14" east 32.74 feet; thence (3) south 79°31'32" east 111.67 feet; thence (4) south 76°52'26" east 104.19 feet; thence (5) north 87°55'06" east 104.33 feet; thence (6) north 62°01'36" east 31.14 feet; thence (7) north 46°27'46" east 23.10 feet; thence (8) north 33°08'08" east 12.71 feet; thence (9) north 19°37'58" east 36.67 feet; thence (10) north 00°14'58" east 46.69 feet; thence (11) north 10°10'3 l" west 41.35 feet; thence (12) north 06°57'47" west 97.03 feet; thence (13) north 04°56'07" west 42.24 feet; thence (14) north 03°58'51" east 124.15 feet; thence · (15) north 09°00'19" east 35.36 feet; thence (16) north 08°34'17" east 106.14 feet; thence (17) north 07°26'47" east 107.63 feet, more or less, Exhibit C-5 to a point in the northerly boundary line of said PARCEL ONE. Central Parcel Extraction Trench Easement A strip of land of the uniform width of 16 feet extending easterly from the westerly boundary line of said PARCEL ONE, and lying 8 feet on each side of the line described as follows: Beginning at a point in the westerly boundary line of said PARCEL ONE, from which Point "B" bears north 08°53 '00" east 249.70 feet; thence leaving said westerly boundary line. (1)-south 80°42'05" east 14.39 feet; thence (2) south 79°43'14" east 64.83 feet to a point within the boundary lines of PARCEL ONE. Central Parcel Electric Facilities Easement That portion of said PARCEL ONE, lying easterly and southerly of the general easterly boundary line of the strip of land hereinbefore described and designated Central Parcel Slurry Wall Easement. Exhibit C-6 "EASTERN PARCEL" (APN 013-021-50) All that certain real property situated in the City of San Rafael, County of Marin, State of California, described as follows: PARCEL ONE: BEGINNING at a point in the Southerly line of Second Street distant 496.5 feet Easterly from the point of intersection of the said Southerly line of Second Street with the Easterly line of Lindaro Street; thence running Easterly along said line of Second Street 140.1 feet to the Southerly line of the San Rafael and San Quentin Turnpike or Toll Road, now known as Francisco Boulevard; thence Southerly and Easterly along said line of said Turnpike 90 feet; thence leaving said Turnpike and running South 14°59 West 153.5 feet; thence North 38°41 West 278.3 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion there of lying within the lines of Lincoln Avenue. AND FURTHER EXCEPTING any portion of the above described property which may have been tidelands in the bed of any tidal slough below the elevation of ordinary high tide. PARCEL TWO: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the Southerly line of Second Street, with the Easterly line of Petaluma Avenue (now known as Lincoln Avenue); thence Easterly along the Southerly line of Second Street 6/10 of a foot to the most Westerly comer of that certain lot or parcel of land which was conveyed by John W. Mackay and James L. Flood to the City of San Rafael, by Deed dated June 5, 1893 and recorded in Book 26 of Deeds at Page 238, Marin County Records; thence along the Southwesterly line of said lot, South 38°041 East 278.3 feet to the most Southerly corner of said lot; thence along the Easterly line of said lot, North 14°59 1 East 153.6 feet to the Southerly line of the Toll Road; thence Easterly along the Southerly line of the Toll Road 6.6 feet to the Westerly bank of the said tidal canal South 1 I 0431 West 289 feet; thence continuing along said Westerly bank on the arc of a circle having a radius of 441.7 feet, 462.3 feet to the said Easterly line of Petaluma Avenue; thence Northerly along the said Easterly line of Petaluma Avenue 702.8 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof as contained in the Deed from the City of San Rafael, a municipal corporation, to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation, recorded October 18, 1961 in Book 1507 of Official Records at Page 381, and re- recorded November 29, 1961 in Book 1519 of Official Records at Page 608, Marin County Records. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof described as follows: A STRIP OF LAND, 10 feet in width, lying Southeasterly of and contiguous to the Southeasterly boundary of that certain parcel of land described in the Deed from the City of San Rafael, a municipal corporation, to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation, recorded Exhibit C-7 October 18, 1961 in Book 1507 of Official Records at Page 381, and re-recorded November 29, 1961 in Book 1519 of Official Records at Page 508, Marin County Records. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM all that portion thereof lying within the lines of Lincoln Avenue. AND FURTHER EXCEPTING any portion of the above described property which may have been tidelands in the bed of any tidal slough below the elevation of ordinary high tide. PARCEL THREE AN EASEMENT for sanitary sewer purposes described as follows: A STRIP of land of the uniform width of 20 feet, the centerline of which is described as follows: COMMENCEMENT at a point on the Easterly line of Lindaro Street at the Intersection of two courses bearing South 7° 15' West and South 8° 15' West, as said courses are shown upon that map entitled, "Map of a Portion of Lindaro Street, City of San Rafael, Marin County, California", filed for record March 2, 1937 in Volume 2 of Official Surveys, at Page 83, Marin County Records; thence North 8° 53' East 32.92 feet to the true point of beginning; thence Southeasterly perpendicular to the aforementioned Easterly line, 315.00 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left, through a central angle of 510 00' 00" having a radius of215.00 feet, an arc distance of 191.37 feet; thence North 47° 53' East 70 feet, more or less, to the termination of the easement and also the Westerly line of Lincoln Avenue, described as an arc 194.78 feet long in a Deed from the City of San Rafael to the Pacific Gas and Electric Company, recorded October 18, 1961 in Book 1507 of Official Records at Page 381, Marin County Records. PARCEL FOUR That certain real property situate in the City of San Rafael, County of Marin, State of California, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the intersection of the southerly line of Second Street with the easterly line of Lincoln Avenue, said point being located South 50°10'00" East 0.32 feet from a lead plug and tag RE5561 set in a concrete sidewalk, and as shown on the Record of Survey Map filed May 10, 1985 in Book 20 of Surveys at Page 47,- Marin County Records; thence along said southerly line of Second Street South 83°33'00" East 1 40.70 feet to the southwesterly line of Francisco Boulevard; thence leaving the southerly line of Second Street and along said southwesterly line of Francisco Boulevard, South 51°37'29" East 98.68 feet to the westerly line ofParcel4, conveyed to the San Rafael Redevelopment Agency by deed recorded October 30, 1997, in Document No. 97-062019; thence along said westerly line South 11°32'07" West 95.76 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Exhibit C-8 thence continuing along said westerly line South 11°32'07" West 189.48 feet; thence on a curve to the right tangent to the preceding course having a radius of 441.70 feet through a central angle of36°0 I'12", an arc length of 277.68 feet to the easterly line of aforementioned Lincoln Avenue; thence along said easterly line of Lincoln Avenue on a curve to the left whose radius point bears North 60°08'08" East 473 feet, through a central angle ofO1°17'20", an arc length of 10.64 feet; thence leaving said easterly line of Lincoln Avenue on a curve to the left whose radius point bears North 31°36'30" West, a distance of315.00 feet, through a central angle of 50°24'27", an arc length of277J3 feet; thence North 12°06'01" East 102.01 feet; thence North 06°19'27" East 109.66 feet; thence leaving the westerly line of said tidal slough North 80°50'15" West 13.96 feet to the Point of Beginning. Said Parcel contains an area of 0.24 acres, more or less. Exhibit C-9 "NORTHERN PARCEL" (Portion of APN 011-265-01) Exhibit C-10 Legal No. Marin Independent Journal 4000 Civic Center Drive, Suite 301 San Rafael, CA 94903 415-382-7335 legals@marinij.com I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the MARIN INDEPENDENT JOURNAL, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published daily in the County of Marin, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Marin, State of California, under date of FEBRUARY 7, 1955, CASE NUMBER 25566; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 03/28/2020 I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated this 30th day of March, 2020. PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Marin Signature PROOF OF PUBLICATION 0006474251 2070419 CITY OF SAN RAFAEL CITY OF SAN RAFAEL CITY CLERK, ROOM 209 1400 FIFTH AVENUE, SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901 SAN RAFAEL, CA 94915-1560 r.BP7-11/10/16 1 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO, 1981 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL ADOPTING AN AMENDED PLANNED DEVELOP· MENT (PD) REZONING (ZClS-002) FOR THE SAN RAFAEL CORPORATE CENTER (SRCC) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING THE RE· SCISSION OF THE PD 1936 DISTRICT, BY ADOP. TION OF A NEW PD DISTRICT TO: 1) ALLOW EX· PANSION OF THE CURRENT SRCC PD DISTRICT BY INCORPORATING THE 118,099 SQ. FT. OF THE 999 3RD STREET PROPERTY INTO THE BOUNDARIES; AND 2) UPDATE PD DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO INCORPORATE REVISED PARKING STANDARDS AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO 72-FOOT TALL, FOUR-STORY RE· SEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BUILDINGS (APN 011-265-01 AND 013·021·34, 35, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54& 55) This Summary concerns a proposed Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Rafael, des ignated as Ordinance No . 1981 , which will amend the City of San Rafa el zoning Map, adopted by reference by Section 14 .01.020 of the San Rafael Municipal Code as detailed in the complete text and accompanying maps of Ordinance No. 1981. Ordinance No . 1981 is scheduled for adoption by the San Rafael City Council at its regular meeting of April 6, 2020. The City Clerk has been directed to publish this Summary pursuant to City Charter and California Gov ernment Code section 36933(c)(l). SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE This Ordinance amends th e Zoning Map of the City of San Rafa el to rec lassify certain real property located at 999 3rd St (APN 011-265-01) and 750, 755, 770, 775 and 790 Lindaro St and 781, 788 and 791 Lincoln Av e (APN's 013-021-34, 35, 50, 51, 52 , 53, 54 & 55) in the City of San Ra - fael, Marin County, California, from Second Third/Mi xe d Use East (2/MUE) zoning District and Plann ed Deve lopment (PD-1936) District to Planned Developm ent (PD-1981) District. PD-1981 establishes de ve lopment standards and land use regulations that wo uld allow the ex pansion of the current San Rafael Corporate Center PD District to the 999 3rd St site and the construction of t wo new research and development/office buildings at 999 3rd St, and maintains th e previously approval of a 1) new 72 ,396 sq ft office building at 755 Lindaro St, and 2) 6 story ex pansion to the existing 6 story parking garage at 788 Lincoln Ave. For a complete copy of the text of the Ordi- nance amending the Municipal Code, please contact the City Clerk at (415) 485-3066 or the Community Deve lopment Department, Plan - nin~ Di vision at (415) 485-3085 . Co pies of the Ordinance containing this Municipal Code amendment are also available for public re - view by contacting the City Clerk's office by email to Lindsay.lara@cityofsanrafael .org . LINDSAY LARA , San Rafa el City Clerk Dated: 03 /26/2020 No. 350 March 28, 2020 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1982 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DA19-001) FOR THE SAN RAFAEL CORPORATE CENTER (750-790 LINDARO STREET AND 781-791 LINCOLN AVENUE AND 999 3rd STREET) TO EXPAND THE ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT AND OVERALL LAND AREA TO INCLUDE TWO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BUILDINGS TOTALING 207,000 SQUARE FEET AND TO DEFINE THE AGREEMENT TERMS (APN’s: 011-265-01, 013-012-38 and -39 and 013-021-50, -51, -52 -53, -54, -55) WHEREAS, in February 1998, the San Rafael City Council adopted a Planned Development Zoning District (PD-1721) approving a Master Plan for the development of a 406,000 square foot office park on a 15.54-acre site located south of Second Street in Downtown San Rafael. Concurrent with this action, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1722 approving a Development Agreement with Fair, Isaac and Company, Inc., the initial project developer, who was planning to be the single tenant for the office park. The Development Agreement included specific terms, conditions and requirements agreed to by both the City and Fair, Isaac for a 10-year build-out of the “San Rafael Corporate Center” office park; and WHEREAS, in August 2000, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1755, approving the first amendment to the Development Agreement to approve changes in the property ownership (Equity Office) and to the development standards in order to accommodate multi- tenant use of the San Rafael Corporate Center. Since 2000, the office park ownership has changed and subsequent amendments to the Development Agreement were adopted to reflect the ownership changes; and WHEREAS, in December 2011, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1902, approving a second amendment to the Development Agreement for the San Rafael Corporate Center to expand the allowable land uses to include medical office and research and development; and WHEREAS, since 2000, nearly all of the approved San Rafael Corporate Center office park campus has been developed and occupied by administrative and professional office and R& D businesses. To date, five of the six office approved office/R& D buildings and two parking structures have been built, along with surface parking, campus landscaping and the publicly accessible park area. and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2018, BioMarin Pharmaceutical (BioMarin), in conjunction with Whistlestop/Eden Housing, submitted project applications to the City of San Rafael Community Development Department for a General Plan Amendment (GPA18-001), Zoning Text Amendment (ZO18-003), Planned Development (PD) Amendment (ZC18-002), Master Use Permit (UP18-034), Environmental and Design Review Permit (ED18-087), Development Agreement (DA19-001), Small Subdivision (S18-001), and Sign Program Amendment (SP18- 18-006) for the development of two 72-foot tall, four-story laboratory/research and development buildings, totaling 207,000 sq. ft., and a 67-unit, 70-foot tall, six-story senior center and affordable senior housing building on a 133,099 sq. ft. parcel at 999 3rd Street (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the total development for BioMarin includes a request to include 118,099 square feet of the 999 3rd Street property to be incorporated into the existing San Rafael 2 Corporate Center (SRCC) PD District. The total site area of the amended SRCC campus would be 795,021 sq. ft.; and WHEREAS, the project application for BioMarin includes a request to modify the existing Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for the 118,099 square feet of the 999 3rd Street property from 1.50 to 0.90 and a request to modify the existing FAR for the SRCC from 0.75 to 0.90. The total FAR of 0.90 for the newly amended SRCC would allow the two proposed buildings, totaling 207,000 sq. ft., of the BioMarin project to be included in the total allowed campus development of 715,519 sq. ft.; and WHEREAS, a Development Agreement has been requested by BioMarin to establish a 10-year time frame for the approvals and to freeze the development application and impact fees for a period of 10 years for the BioMarin component of the Project; and BioMarin has offered the City a series of public benefits as consideration for the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, a Development Agreement has been drafted to incorporate the proposed terms and obligations for both parties; and WHEREAS, the proposed Development Agreement has been processed in accordance with the requirements set forth in City Council Resolution No. 6089, which establishes the City’s rules and regulations for the consideration of Development Agreements; and WHEREAS, on January 28, 2020, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the environmental documents and applications and for the Project, including this Development Agreement, accepting all oral and written public testimony and the written report of the Community Development Department Planning staff. The Planning Commission considered the responses to comments contained in the FEIR and recommended to the City Council, by Resolution No. 20-01, certification of the Final EIR in that it complies with all requirements of CEQA. The Planning Commission also recommended to the City Council, by Resolution No. 20-02, adoption of Statement of Overriding Considerations and Approval of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP); and WHEREAS, on January 28, 2020, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 20- 06, recommending to the City Council approval of the proposed Development Agreement, with one modification, to not eliminate a condition of approval, previously imposed on the 755 Lindaro/Lincoln Garage expansion, requiring the creation of a pedestrian connection to SMART on the backside of the Lincoln Avenue garage, along the west side of Mahon Creek; and . WHEREAS, on January 28, 2020, the Planning Commission also adopted the following Resolutions, recommending to the City Council: • Approval of a General Plan amendment (GPA18-001) (Resolution No. 20-03) • Adoption of a Zoning Ordinance text amendment (ZO18-003) (Resolution No. 20-04) • Adoption of a Planned Development Rezoning (ZC18-002) (Resolution No. 20-05), • Approval of a Use Permit (UP18-034), Environmental and Design Review Permit (ED18-087), Small Subdivision (S18-001), and Sign Program Amendment (SP18- 006) (Resolution No 20-07); and WHEREAS, on February 28, 2020, a Notice of Availability for the FEIR/Response to Comments was mailed to interested persons and property owners and occupants within 500 feet of the property and to all responsible, trustee and other public agencies that commented on 3 the DEIR, informing them of the City Council hearing for final action. A Notice of Availability was also published in the Marin Independent Journal on Saturday, February 29, 2020 and the site was posted with public hearing signs; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2020, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to review the proposed Development Agreement and considered all oral and written public testimony and the written report of the Community Development Department; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2020, by adoption of separate two resolutions, the City Council certified the FEIR, adopted CEQA findings of fact, adopted a statement of overriding consideration and approved the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP); and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2020, the City Council, by adoption of separate Resolutions, approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA18-001), Use Permit (UP18-034), Environmental and Design Review Permit (ED18-087), Small Subdivision (S18-001), and Sign Program Amendment (SP18-006); and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2020, the City Council, by adoption of separate Ordinances, approved a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (ZO18-003) and Planned Development Rezoning (ZC18-002); and WHEREAS, the custodian of documents which constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based, is the Community Development Department. WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 6089, for approval of the Development Agreement and incorporated herein by reference: Development Agreement Findings (DA19-001) 1. The proposed Development Agreement is consistent with the policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and other applicable specific plan given that the proposed office and research and development uses within the BioMarin campus would be consistent with the 2/3 MUE general plan land use designation, the proposed floor area ratio and height of the building are consistent with the FAR and height standards, with the inclusion of a General Plan amendment, which has been adopted by separate City Council resolution. The Development Agreement, and the approvals vested therein, would be consistent with: a. Circulation Element Policy C-5D (Evaluation of Project Merits) and Program C-5c (Exception Review), which acknowledge that the City may approve an action that would exceed the LOS standards set by Policy C-5, if the City finds that the benefits of the project to the community outweigh the traffic impacts. b. Neighborhood Element Policy NH-40 (Second Third Mixed Use District) and NH-41 (Second Third Mixed Use District Design Considerations), by promoting a high- quality mixed-use development in the downtown designated areas; c. Economic Vitality Element Policies EV-2 (Seek, Retain and Promote Businesses that Enhance San Rafael), EV-4 (Local Economic and Community Impacts), EV-8 (Diversity of our Economic Base), and EV-13 (Business Areas) by broadening, with 4 limited application, the uses that are permitted in areas that are designated for general commercial and office land uses. 2. The Development Agreement, and the approvals vested therein, is compatible with the uses authorized in the regulations prescribed for the land use district in which the property is located, with an amendment to the PD zoning district which has been adopted by separate City Council resolution, in that: a. This action would be consistent with and implement San Rafael General Plan Land Use Element LU-9 (Intensity of Nonresidential Development), with an appropriate development intensity based on consistency with the following factors: site resources and constraints, traffic and access, potentially hazardous conditions, adequacy of infrastructure, and City design policies; b. The proposed blended 0.90 Floor Area Ratio will reduce the existing 999 3rd Street FAR but raise the existing SRCC FAR from 0.75 to 0.90. The net change will result in a total floor area that will be an increase in 30,678 sq. ft. for the newly modified total Project area. c. This action would not be growth inducing nor would it be precedent setting as the property and proposed square footage addition would be consistent with the development standards and land uses included in the existing San Rafael Corporate Center. The development of the proposed Project at this location would be in the public interest in that it would further the policies of the General Plan by developing an infill property within the downtown area of San Rafael. In summary, the Development Agreement would not result in similar development increases for other areas of San Rafael and would not be precedent setting or growth-inducing. 3. The Development Agreement, and the approvals vested therein, is in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice in that the proposed Project would provide desired public benefits and amenities as described in the adopted modification of General Plan Exhibit 10, including: Affordable housing (67 senior affordable units), a privately-owned public plaza (approximately 6,000 sq. ft.), a community facility (18,000 sq. ft. senior center), pedestrian crossing safety improvements at adjacent intersections, and donation of funds for development of bike lanes. These public benefits would be consistent with other public benefit requirements for height bonuses for developments in the downtown area. 4. The Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare, given that the City Council has certified an EIR assessing potential environmental impacts and most potential impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels with mitigation measures, and, by separate resolution, has adopted a statement of overriding considerations to four potential significant unavoidable impacts to land use and transportation associated with the development of the Project. a. The City Council has balanced the economic, legal, social, and technological benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental impacts when determining to approve the project. The project benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects and are considered “acceptable” and a statement of overriding considerations has been adopted and supported by substantial evidence in the record; 5 b. In support of CEQA Guidelines Section 15063 the San Rafael General Plan 2020 includes Circulation Element Policy C-5D (Evaluation of Project Merits) and Program C-5c (Exception Review), which permits the City to authorize an exception to the City-adopted traffic standards by weighing the community benefits of a project against the potential for the project to deviate from the City-adopted level of service (LOS) traffic standards; WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Planning Commission’s recommendation to retain the previously imposed requirement for a new path behind the Lincoln Avenue parking garage, but finds that the elimination of this requirement is appropriate and warranted based on: 1) the totality of the benefits offered by the Development Agreement, which capture increased funding for pedestrian and bicycle improvements in the area; and 2) the Council’s finding that the proposed new path would be duplicative with two other existing pedestrian paths within two hundred feet (Mahon Creek path along the eastern bank of Mahon Creek and Lincoln Avenue sidewalk), which provide similar and equal public access from Lincoln Avenue to 2nd Street and the Bettini Transit Center. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: DIVISION 1. Findings. The City Council hereby determines and finds that all of the facts and statements contained in the recitals herein, and the findings of Planning Commission Resolution No. 20-06, adopted January 28, 2020, recommending to the City Council adoption of this Ordinance, are true and correct. DIVISION 2. Approval of Development Agreement. The City Council hereby approves the Development Agreement, between with BioMarin (California Corporate Center Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company “CCCA”) and the City of San Rafael concerning the San Rafael Corporate Center project planned for the subject property at 999 3rd Street and the existing San Rafael Corporate Center Campus, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. and the Council authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute said Development Agreement on behalf of the City and to take any other actions necessary to complete this transaction. DIVISION 3. Publication; Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be published once, in full or in summary form, before its final passage, in a newspaper of general circulation, published, and circulated in the City of San Rafael, and shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. If published in summary form, the summary shall also be published within fifteen (15) days after the adoption, together with the names of those Councilmembers voting for or against same, in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of San Rafael, County of Marin, State of California. 6 GARY O. PHILLIPS, Mayor ATTEST: LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk The foregoing Ordinance No. 1982 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Rafael, held on the 23rd day of March 2020 and ordered passed to print by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Councilmembers: Bushey, Colin, Gamblin, McCullough and Mayor Phillips NOES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None And will come up for adoption as an Ordinance of the City of San Rafael at a Regular Meeting of the Council to be held on the 6th day of April 2020. LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk Legal No. Marin Independent Journal 4000 Civic Center Drive, Suite 301 San Rafael, CA 94903 415-382-7335 legals@marinij.com I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the MARIN INDEPENDENT JOURNAL, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published daily in the County of Marin, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Marin, State of California, under date of FEBRUARY 7, 1955, CASE NUMBER 25566; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: 03/28/2020 I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated this 30th day of March, 2020. PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Marin Signature PROOF OF PUBLICATION 0006474254 2070419 CITY OF SAN RAFAEL CITY OF SAN RAFAEL CITY CLERK, ROOM 209 1400 FIFTH AVENUE, SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901 SAN RAFAEL, CA 94915-1560 r.BP7-11/10/16 1 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 1982 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DA19-001) FOR THE SAN RAFAEL CORPORATE CENTER (750-790 LINDARO STREET AND 781 · 791 LINCOLN AVENUE AND 999 3rd STREET) TO EXPAND THE ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT AND OVERALL LAND AREA TO INCLUDE TWO RE· SEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BUILDINGS TO· TALING 207,000 SQUARE FEET AND TO DEFINE THE AGREEMENT TERMS (APN's: 011·265-01, 013-012·38 and •39 and 013-021-SO, ·51, ·52 ·53, ·54, ·55) This Summ ary conce rn s a propose d Ordin ance of the City Co un cil of t he City of Sa n Raf ae l, desig nat ed as Or din ance No. 1982, w hi ch w ill ap prove a Developm ent Agree ment as det ail ed in t he co mpl et e t ext of Ordin ance No. 1982. Or- dinance No. 1982 is scheduled f or ado ptio n by the Sa n Raf ael City Coun cil at its reg ular mee t - in g of April 6, 2020. Th e City Cl erk has bee n d i- rec t ed t o publish this Summ ary pu rsuant to City Charter and Californi a Governm ent Code sec tion 36933(c)(l). SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE Thi s Ordin ance est abli shes a Develop ment Agree ment bet wee n the City of San Raf ae l and Bi o Marin (Ca liforni a Co rp orate Center Acq ui si- ti on, LLC , a Delaware limited li ability co m pany "CCC A") asso ci at ed with the proposal t o build t wo new, 4 st ory (72 ft t all ) resea rch and deve lopment/offi ce buildin gs at 999 3rd St , and the previously approved 72 ,396 sq . ft . of - f ice building at 755 Lind aro St and a six st ory ex pansio n t o the Lin co ln Ave garage. Th e De- ve lop m ent Agree ment woul d es t abli sh a 10 year time frame on pr oj ect the approva ls and freezes applica tio n and impac t f ees at current rat es, in exc hange f or a se ri es of public bene- fits. Fo r a co mplet e co py of th e tex t of th e Ord i- nance am ending t he Municip a l Co de, pl ease contac t the City Clerk at (415 ) 485-3066 o r the Co mmunity Deve lopm ent Depa rtm ent, Pl an- nin g Di vision at (4 15) 48 5-3 085. Cop ies of the Ordin ance co nta ining t his Muni cipa l Code amendm en t are also avail abl e fo r public re- view by co ntactin g the City Clerk's office by email to Lin dsay .l a ra@c ityofsa nraf ae l.o rg. LIND SAY LARA , San Rafae l City Clerk Dat ed: 03/26/2020 No. 351 March 28, 2020