HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRB 2017-10-17 #3REPORT TO DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
SUBJECT: 6 Tamal Vista —Environmental and Design Review 1,180 square foot addition to an existing
single family residence; APN: 010-252-06; R5 -H Zone; Stewart Summers, Applicant; James
McDowell, Owner; West End Village Neighborhood
PROPERTY FACTS
Location General Plan Designation
Project Site: Low Density Residential
North:
Low Density Residential
South:
Low Density Residential
East:
Low Density Residential
West:
Low Density Residential
Zoning Designation
Single-family residential (R5)
Single-family residential (R5)
Single-family residential (R5)
Single-family residential (R5)
Single-family residential (R5)
Existing Land -Use
Single-family
Residential
Single-family residential
Single-family residential
Single-family residential
Single-family residential
Lot Size
Lot Coverage (Max.)
Required: 5,000 sq. ft.
Standard: (40% max. lot coverage)
Existing: 5,718 sq. ft.
Max allowed Proposed:
2,287 sq. ft. 1,596.4 sq. ft.
Gross Building Square footage
Natural State Max
Standard (2,500+ 10% of lot area; includes
Standard: (25% of lot plus percent slope (31.5%)
garage and accessory structures)
Min. Required Proposed:
Max allowed Proposed
3,230.67 sq. ft. N/A
3,072 sq. ft. 3,067 sq. ft. (includes
garage)
Height
Parking
Allowed: 30 feet
Required: 2 covered parking spaces
Proposed: 21.5 feet
Proposed: 2 covered parking spaces
Min. Lot Width (Lot area/lot depth)
Setbacks
Required: 50 feet (60 feet corner lot)
Required
Existing
Proposed addition
Existing: 55 feet
Front:
15'
16' (5' to
garage)
7.5'
(5' to garage)
Tree Removal
Total(No./Species): 0)
Side(s):
10% of lot width
3' (south)
6.5' (south)
(Min T and Max
5' (north)
5.5' (north)
5')
Ext side:
n/a
Ped. side:
n/a
Bldg. sep:
n/a
Rear:
10'
+17.5'
+17.5'
SUMMARY
The project is being referred to the Board for Environmental and Design Review permit
recommendation for a setback waiver related to a proposed 1,180 square foot addition to an existing
single-family residence.
The setback waiver would allow the upper story addition will encroach 7.5 feet into the required 15 -feet
front yard and would require an increased rear yard setback of at least 17.5 feet where 10 feet is
required for this district. The applicant proposes to comply with all other development standards
including height limit, gross building square footage, and natural state requirements.
Staff requests that the Board review this report and provide a recommendation on the proposed front
yard setback waiver. Specifically, staff asks the Board to consider the following:
Site Plan
• Whether a front yard setback waiver is appropriate given the increase in the rear yard setback.
Architecture
• Whether the proposed architectural design provides enough variation in wall setbacks and variation
in roof and wall articulation to minimize the impact of the setback waiver.
• Whether the upper story addition is proportionately smaller than the lower level floor area such that
bulk and mass is minimized.
Materials and Colors
Whether proposed colors and materials are appropriate.
BACKGROUND
Site Description & Setting:
The project site is located on a developed site in the West End Village neighborhood. The site has a
slope of over 31.57% and is currently developed with a 1,556 square foot single family residence.
Access to the residence is from an exterior stairway that provides access to the upper level of home.
The rear of the property is terraced with a concrete patio and terraced landscaped and play areas
flowing upslope toward the rear property boundary. A large redwood tree is located on the northerly
corner of the site and will not be affected by the proposed addition. The project is subject to the Hillside
Development Standards given the site slope is greater than the 25% threshold.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Use: The project consists of a 1,180 square foot single family addition to an existing 1,556 square foot
residence.
Site Plan: The project site plan demonstrates that there will be very little expansion beyond the existing
foot print of the building. Some regrading and resurfacing of the existing driveway will occur.
Architecture: The project proposes to add 1,180 square feet to an existing residence as follows:
First level (within crawlspace): 311 square feet to accommodate new entry, stairs, laundry, etc.
Second level: 211 square foot addition to accommodate interior stairs and a living
room addition
Third level: 657 square foot addition to accommodate a master bedroom suite.
Landscaping: • Existing site landscaping will not change
ANALYSIS
General Plan 2020 Consistency:
The following General Plan Policies apply to the project:
Land Use — LU8 (Density of Residential Development) The applicant proposes an addition to an
existing single-family residence. The proposed addition will not change the use of the building and will
not cause an increase in density.
Land Use — LU12 (Building Heights) General Plan Land Use Policy LU12 has establishes a maximum
building height of 30 feet for this lot. For hillside overlay lots, height is measured from natural grade to
highest elevation. The will comply because the height that will result from the addition will not exceed
21.5 feet.
Housing — H2 (Design That Fits into the Neighborhood Context). The project site is located in a
neighborhood with a mix of architectural styles. The applicant proposes a Mediterranean architectural
style which is one of the architectural styles that exist in the neighborhood.
Neighborhood — N2 (New Development in Residential Neighborhoods) The applicant proposes a
design that use stepbacks and articulation in building walls and roof lines. The use of steps as well as
wall and roof variations serve to minimize bulk and mass when viewed from all four sides of the
building.
Zoning Ordinance Consistency:
Chapter 4 — Single Family Residential District
Section 14.04.040 (Residential District) of the Zoning Ordinance identifies the development standards
of the Single Family Residential (R5) Zoning District. The plans demonstrate that the proposed
development would meet all the applicable development standards except for the front setback
deviations as discussed below.
Chapter 12- Hillside Development Overlay District
The applicant requests a Setback Waiver proposing a 7.5 -foot front yard setback reduction for the
residence. Staff requests the Board's formal recommendation as to whether the proposed decrease
minimizes the impact of hillside development and grading by avoiding development toward the back of
the lot.
NEIGHBORHOOD CORRESPONDENCE
Notice.was sent to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the site and the West End Village
Neighborhood association within 15 days of the Design Review Board meeting. Notice was also posted
on the site a minimum of 15 days prior to the meeting. The city received two letters of concern from
neighboring property owners. The primary concerns expressed are related to impacts on views and
privacy.
Views: The San Rafael Zoning Code identifies the need to respect major views from public vantage
points. Views to be protected are those that are directed toward the San Pablo Bay, wetlands, bay
frontage, the Canal, Mt. Tamalpais and the hills. The proposed addition will not affect major views to
any of the above resources as seen from the public vantage points.
Privacy: The San Rafael Zoning Code identifies the need to protect privacy when upper story additions
are reviewed. Specifically, the code requires the following:
• There shall be a minimum number of upper -story windows facing the rear where privacy of
adjacent residential structures would be significantly affected
• Avoid unfiltered and direct views from a primary living area into a primary living room, bedroom
or backyard recreational area of an adjoining residential property would result.
• Windows above the first story shall be designed so that they do not look directly onto private
patios or backyards of adjoining residential property.
• Skylights, opaque glass, permanently affixed louvers, inset windows or windows with high sills
may be required where appropriate when other window designs would severely affect the
privacy of rear yards or patios of adjacent residences
The project is designed such that the master bedroom window is directed toward the front yard facing
the street. Rear yard windows are limited to closet and bathroom windows which are not considered
primary living areas. As such the privacy of adjacent residential structures would not be significantly
affected.
CONCLUSION
Staff recommends that the Board provide the applicant with feedback regarding the proposed setback
waiver and general design feedback as deemed necessary. The Board should also provide a formal
recommendation to be forwarded to the Zoning Administrator to consider as part of the Environmental
and Design Review permit consideration.
EXHIBITS
Project Plans
cc: James McDowell, owner
Stewart Summers, sksarch(u)-gmail.com
Cindy Stier, Cynthia. Stier(a)-usdoi.gov
Nancy Boughey, nancyboughey@gmail.com
4