The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCS Minor League Baseball; Centerfield Partners 2012Agenda Item No: 4 a Meeting Date: September 19, 2011 SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Department: Community Services Prepared by: Carlene McCart, Director City Manager Approval: SUBJECT: Agreement between the City of San Rafael and Centerfield Partners to utilize Albert Park Stadium and Baseball Field for professional minor league baseball in 2012. RECOMMENDATION: Approve use of facilities and direct staff to return with final Agreement for the 2012 baseball season on October 3, 2011. BACKGROUND: In April 2011, Centerfield Partners, LLC, submitted a Proposal to the City to bring professional baseball to Albert Park. The Proposal submitted by Centerfield required an Agreement with the City due to Centerfield's desire for a three-year term and its offer to make improvements to the facilities as well as pay standard rental fees for use of the facility. The Centerfield Partners application process thus far has been as follows: February through April 2011 - Staff and Centerfield Partners met to discuss the feasibility of the site and facilities to accommodate the Proposal, along with schedules, process, fees, and other potential issues. April 28, 2011 - Proposal to the Park and Recreation Commission to determine if the Commission would recommend to the City Council, as the Council's advisory board, an Agreement with Centerfield Partners for use of Albert Park Stadium and Baseball Field. FOR CITY CLERK ONLY Council Meeting: 7(/17/,:�rl r/ Disposition:,°: =- SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Pa e: 2 45 members of the public attended the Commission meeting. After discussion and public comment, the Commission requested that City staff provide additional information on the following issues: ■ Compliance of the Proposal with General Plan 2020 • Compliance of the Proposal with the Albert Park Master Plan ■ San Rafael Municipal Code, Chapter 8.13 as it applies to noise in and around Albert Park ■ Feasibility of light shields on existing field lights ■ Park -Ing requirements and availability ■ Existing uses of Albert Park Baseball Field and Stadium • Community promotion opportunities May 19, 2011 - 37 members of the public attended the second Park and Recreation Commission meeting concerning the Proposal. After discussion and public comment, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend the Proposal to the Council with the provision that a public review mid way through the first season of the Agreement be conducted to address any issues that exist at that time. May — June, 2011 — Centerfield met with Federation of Neighborhoods, Business Issues Committee, Redevelopment Citizens Advisory Committee, and Downtown Business Improvement District. June, 2011 - Staff and Centerfield negotiate a multi-year, non exclusive Agreement for the use of Albert Park Baseball Field and Stadium. Centerfield was required to produce a site -improvement plan and implementation plans to address management of parking, traffic, security, service of alcoholic beverages, noise, concessions, and community benefits. The implementation plans were reviewed by the office of the City Attorney, and the Departments of Community Development, Fire, Police, Public Works and the Community Services. Comments and requirements as the result of this review were incorporated into the Agreement and its attached implementation plans. July IS - Proposal and Agreement were brought to the City Council. After the presentation from staff and Centerfield Partners, forty-four members of the public spoke. Twenty-one members spoke in favor of the proposal citing benefits to the community, local businesses and hotels of family-oriented entertainment at reasonable cost to the community. Twenty members spoke against the proposal, citing negative impacts such as parking, traffic, noise, vandalism and criminal behavior in the neighborhoods surrounding Albert Park. Three members spoke in favor of the proposal with conditions. Due to the late hour after the comments were submitted, the Council directed staff to return within four weeks with responses to the questions raised. August 4 - A Council subcommittee comprised of Mayor Boro and Councilmember Connolly convened a meeting between neighborhood representatives and Centerfield. Fifty-nine people were in attendance. Presentations on the primary issues of parking, traffic, noise, alcoholic beverage service, site improvements and community benefit were made by staff and Centerfield. Members of the public asked questions on each topic. A meeting to respond to those questions was scheduled for August 9. The responses to questions posed at the August 4 meeting were posted on the City Website prior to the meeting. SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 3 August 9 - Fifty-six people attended the Community Meeting, along with the City Council sub committee of Mayor Boro and Councilmember Connolly, Centerfield representatives, City Attorney, and Community Services, Economic Development, Police and Public Works Department representatives. Presentations were made to address the questions generated at the August 4 meeting. Community concerns remained over the environmental review of the proposed use. At that meeting, Centerfield Partners offered to evaluate an Initial Study of Environmental Impact under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), conducted by an outside consultant hired by the City to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the proposed use. While not required by the City, it was suggested that an Initial Study would address neighborhood concerns for environmental impacts as a result of the proposed use of Albert Park. The list of questions posed by the community at the meeting of August 9 were slated to be integrated into an Initial Study, to the extent they were appropriately within the purview of environmental review, and otherwise through coinciding staff review, and made available for public comment before a recommendation to City Council for review on August 15. August 15 At the request of Centerfield, City Council review of the Proposal and Agreement was postponed to September 19. August 19 - Centerfield Partners submitted a revised Proposal to the City, included here as Attachment A. The same revised Proposal was submitted to the citizen's group known as Communities for Albert Park ("CAP"). Dotty LeMieux, legal council for CAP responded to the revised proposal by letter to the Mayor dated August 30, included in Attachment B to this report. ANALYSIS: Comparison of Original and Revised Proposals Since the July 18 Council Meeting, Centerfield Partners revised the scope of the original Proposal. The following table demonstrates the areas of change in the Proposal. s n .4 rig; -- - — ----------- o -P Term 3 years 1 year Schedule 45 dates, May -mid September same Fees $32,000 with $ 10,000 facility $35,000 with $5,000 facility improvement credits improvement credits Seating Capacity 700 in existing stadium, and 700 in existing stadium and 800 in bleachers 100 in chairs Site Improvements Backstop net, dugout Backstop net, dug out protective fence, clean/paint protective fence, cleaning of grandstand, dugouts and grandstand, dugouts and 1 locker rooms, fencing of 1 locker rooms, modified exterior area around stadium, I portable concession equipment installation of portable I inside stadium I concession, ticket booth equipment, within fence extension, possible outfield fence extension. SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 4 Parking Parking at Seagate parking lot Free parking at Seagate for 490 cars, $3-$5 per car; parking lot; no team parking team parking at Community at community center Center Traffic Anticipated 490 -cars Anticipated 256 cars Noise Operate within the Noise Operate within the Noise Ordinance; reduce PA use Ordinance; eliminate after 10 p.m. amplified music after 9 p.m., reduce PA use after I Op.m. Safety/Security Hire local security firm to Same provide security in the parking lot, around ballpark exterior L and inside ballpark; no tailgating Concessions Install temporary fencing and Using temporary features, concession features outside operate within existing interior the ball park areas of the ball park Alcohol Management No alcohol in parking lot, no Same with addition of no alcohol allowed to be brought alcohol served after the 71h into Stadium, no more than 2 inning or 10 p.m. whichever is beverages sold per person at first one time no service after the 7`h inning Costs to City Estimated $10-11,000 same The revised Proposal responds to the expressed concerns of the community over a long-term agreement with the City, attendance, traffic, parking incentives, noise, and extension of the Stadium use into the Park areas, alcoholic beverage service, and increased revenue for the City. It maintains a portion of the improvements originally offered, a sound security plan, and the number of dates of use. It also maintains the benefit of providing affordable family entertainment, a draw to Downtown businesses, and patronage of local hotels. Consistency with Current and Historic Use. The revised Proposal reduces the original scope of use of the facilities and is consistent with the current and historical uses of the Albert Park Stadium and Baseball Field Scope of use is consistent with current and historic uses. Historically, the use of Albert Park Stadium and Baseball Field has ranged from various large group events and games attracting capacity attendance, to casual games and practices attended by 40-50 participants and spectators. While users are asked to estimate the number of attendees as park of the Facility Use Permit process, the only restriction is the capacity of the Stadium for safety reasons. Examples of uses that draw under 300 spectators include: High school league baseball games, Junior League games, City -sponsored recreational league games, Novato Knicks I games, Bay Area league games, Marin High School Fall Ball games, Dominican College games and College of Marin practices. SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 5 Examples of larger group baseball uses include: Marin County Athletic League Playoffs with 200- 1200 spectators according to MCAL statistics, attending league playoff and championship games. . The North Coast Section has also used Albert Park for both baseball and softball playoff games. Attendance has been as high as 1,000 according to NCS statistics. From 1997 to 2002 the San Francisco Seals Collegiate Baseball Team utilized Albert Park. The Seals played, on average, 30 games per year from June into early August. The Seals business plan was similar to Centerfield, and the organization had hoped to draw over 1,000 patrons to their games, more typically drawing less than 300. The revised Proposal from Centerfield reduces the number of seats from the original plan for 1500, 700 stadium and 800 bleacher seats, to 800, 700 stadium and 100 chairs. Centerfield now estimates an average of 500-700 tickets will be sold for typical games. Specific games, for instance those scheduled on a holiday such as Labor Day, may produce a higher demand for tickets. Centerfield plans to offer standing room only tickets on those occasions, within the historic attendance levels for baseball games at Albert Park. Dates, days and game times are consistent with current uses. Centerfield games will be scheduled after the typical youth, high school, college, and spring recreational baseball seasons, on days and hours used now for games by semi professional and private baseball leagues, and recreation leagues. Seating capacity is consistent with the larger group uses of the facilities. The City has typically allowed the temporary addition of bleachers along the first and third base lines, behind the fences, for uses that may exceed the 700 seat capacity of the Stadium. MCAL and NCS generally add these seats; Davidson Middle School graduation adds chairs to increase seating availability, as examples. • Fees relate directly to the Fee Schedule. Centerfield will pay the Commercial Rate for hourly use of the field for games and practices. In addition City will also benefit by the proposed Stadium/field improvements • Parking proposal exceeds the requirements of existing uses. Centerfield is providing off site -parking, at no charge to attendees. Typical users are not required to do so. • Traffic management exceeds the requirements of existing uses. Centerfield has responded to traffic issues identified by the City by monitoring the efficient entry of cars from the street into the parking lot and providing crosswalk and sidewalk safety measures. Typical users are not required to do so. • Noise management exceeds the requirements for existing uses. Centerfield will utilize the same public address system available to all users. In addition they have agreed to conclude music amplified over the system at 9:00 p.m. and reduce announcing after 10:00 p.m. Typical users are not restricted on the use of the PA system. SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 6 • Alcohol management exceeds the requirements for existing uses. Alcoholic beverages are allowed to be consumed in the Stadium with specific permission from the City. Sales of alcoholic beverages are allowed with permission from the Community Services and Police Departments and then only with a pen -nit for sale from the California Alcoholic Beverage Control office. The Seals baseball team received permission for sale of alcoholic beverages. Other groups have occasionally been permitted to consume alcoholic beverages within the Stadium. When permission is granted, additional security measures, such as those that apply to the revised Proposal are required. Centerfield commits to screening ticket holders to prevent alcohol from entering the stadium. They also agree to selling no more than two beverages per person per sale and stop selling at the end of the 7t" inning or 10 p.m. which ever comes first. These measures, along with staff training on the nationally recognized TEAM alcohol beverage service management program, provide measures beyond City and State requirements to successfully operate beverage concessions. 0 Security exceeds the requirements of existing uses. San Rafael Police Department reviews applications for large group uses of City -owned recreational facilities and determines the need and level of required security. Often a user group is mandated to pay for off-duty Police Officers. High school baseball games, for instance are often require to have 1-2 off duty Officers on the site. The Centerfield Proposal was reviewed by the Police Department and determined to be sufficient for the Stadium, and goes beyond to provide service to the parking lot and the exterior of the facility. • Concessions are consistent with current uses. The facility had a concession stand structure on site in the area identified in the Centerfield Proposal. Facility users were given access to the concession stand during game hours. It was demolished after many years of service. A temporary installation of concession equipment is in keeping with past use and current large group use. • Light usage is projected to be consistent or slightly less than current uses. In the spring and fall months the field lights are in operation more hours per week than the summer season, due to natural light availability. Centerfield will play during the Z:) summer season. • Costs to City are consistent with current uses. Costs estimated to service the Centerfield proposal are consistent with current expenses. Maintenance provided by the Parks Division will remain at the same level, as the field requires the same amount of mowing, irrigation, and general preparation to serve Centerfield and the other field users. The specific game day field day preparation, dragging, lining, setting out bases, preparing the pitching mound and home plate areas is consistent with the service now provided by seasonal part-time employees. Revenue from rental fees will support the service to the Centerfield games, as with other users. SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 7 • Additional facility requirements such as restrooms andgarbage collection are consistent with large group uses. When warranted by anticipated attendance, the City requires supplemental services for restroom facilities and garbage containment/collection. Centerfield has agreed to provide additional restroom facilities to accommodate the anticipated attendance at games, and to increase the number of garbage containers if necessary. Environmental Review As more thoroughly explained in prior staff reports, the City Attorney determined that the scope of the original Proposal was consistent with the historic uses of Albert Park stadium and Baseball Field, which for many years has hosted both daytime and nighttime softball and baseball games, including games almost every night of the week during the summer season. Accordingly, the City Attorney advised staff and the Council that the project qualified for a Categorical Exemption from environmental review under Section 15323 of the CEQA Guidelines, an exception for the "Normal Operations of Facilities for Public Gatherings". The City Attorney also advised, however, that application of a Categorical Exemption is not mandatory, and that the City Council retains discretion to determine whether an exemption is appropriate in a particular case. Thus, after the original Proposal drew concerns from the community over possible environmental impacts on the neighborhoods surrounding Albert Park, but prior to a decision by the City Council on the applicability of the Categorical Exemption, Centerfield announced it would evaluate the request by community members for preparation of an Initial Study of the Proposal. Centerfield has now determined to revise and reduce the scope of its proposal rather than proceed with an Initial Study of the original Proposal. Staff believes, and the City Attorney concurs, that the reduced scope of the revised Proposal reinforces the conclusion that the proposed use is entirely consistent with current and historic uses of Albert Park Stadium and Baseball Field, and that a Categorical Exemption from environmental review is warranted. Staff believes that requiring the preparation of an Initial Study for this application would be inconsistent with the requirements imposed by the City on other similarly- situated users of Albert Park Stadium and Baseball Field, and would be inappropriate. Recommendation The Centerfield revised Proposal represents a use of Albert Park Stadium and Baseball Field that is appropriate and consistent with current and historic use. It includes more and specific commitment to parking, traffic, noise, security, and alcohol management than any of the current groups utilizing the facility. Fees generated are slightly higher than current revenue from the facility rental, as the rate is higher for this commercial use. In addition to fees collected, the City will receive a level of facility improvements that will benefit all users. Minor league professional baseball in San Rafael will provide a valuable community resource for multi- generational recreation and entertainment at a reasonable cost to participants. It will also benefit Downtown businesses and local hotels, as endorsed by the San Rafael Chamber of Commerce. These benefits to the residents and businesses of San Rafael come with no risk to the City. The public; private -partnership represented in the Agreement is an effective model used by the City to provide citizens with services that local government cannot solely support. The scope of the revised Proposal qualifies the use for a Categorical Exemption from environmental review, and an Initial Study should not be required. Previous to this meeting, eight public meetings have been held, along with five meetings with specific organizations. Comments and questions have been addressed in meetings and circulated SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Pa e• 8 in writing and on the City web page. The revised Proposal responds to the major issues raised by the public. It does not satisfy all factions of the public engaged in this issue, but it has evolved to be a viable, valuable and appropriate use of City -owned recreation facilities. Staff recommends the City Council approve the use of Albert Park by Centerfield Partners as outlined in the revised Proposal. It is further recommended that staff be directed to amend the original Agreement to reflect the reduced scope of use of the revised Proposal. Staff will return to the City Council for approval of the final Agreement at the first meeting in October. The Council took a similar action earlier this year when it approved the use of Albert Park Stadium and Baseball Field by Paul Nave, and Liberty Boxing, LLC and directed staff to prepare and execute a Facility Use Permit appropriate for the specific event. FISCAL IMPACT The City will receive hourly rental fees under this Proposal for use of facilities and field lights. In addition, Centerfield will provide temporary and permanent improvements that will benefit the City budget and the users of the ballpark. The rental rate for use of Albert Park Baseball Field and Stadium set forth in the City of San Rafael Master Fee Schedule is $80 for Commercial Use. In addition the City charges $40 per hour for the use of the field lights. Revenue to the City for this use will be determined by the number of hours the pre -game facility is utilized annually for practice, and games, and the I number of hours that lights will be required for night games. Revenues will be calculated per season. Revenue is estimated to be $35,000, depending on the number of hours used and lighting required. 4:1 The Agreement calls for Centerfield to provide limited permanent improvements to the facility for which credit will be applied against the annual rental fees. Centerfield will provide expenditure evidence, and be allowed up to $5,000 credit annually against rental fees for approved permanent improvements. Regular maintenance service provided by the Parks Division will remain at current levels. The scope of use in the revised Proposal does not expand the need for mowing, irrigation, utilities, etc beyond the use patterns the field receives now so no additional call for City resources is anticipated in this regard. Game day preparation will increase, however, and to respond to this need, a seasonal part-time employee will be hired by the Community Services Department to supplement City resources for this rental use. This employee will line and prepare the infield before each game, clean the Stadium seating and surfaces as needed, empty garbage, stock interior restrooms, unlock facilities and generally ready the Stadium and Baseball field prior to game time. The projected expenditure for this seasonal position is $5-6,000 annually. It is prudent to assume minor additional expenditures to respond to facility repairs or equipment replacement each season. Staff allows $5,000 for these expenditures. To summarize the annual fiscal impact Agreement: Projected Annual Revenue $35,000 Less: Projected Annual Expenditures 10-11.000 Less: Maximum Credit for Improvements 5,000 Net Revenue $20-21,000 SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 9 Currently the City receives $17,000 for use of the field by non-profit and private groups. This amount will not vary significantly as the spring and fall seasons will not be affected by Centerfield use, and only a portion of the summer season reservations will be usurped. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the Use of Albert Park stadium and Baseball Field for one year by Centerfield Partners and direct staff to return with a final Agreement for approval. 2. Direct staff to work with Centerfield Partners to amend the revised Proposal for use of Albert Park Stadium and Baseball Field by Centerfield Partners and direct staff to return with a final Agreement for approval. 3. Reject the revised Proposal and the use of Albert Park by Centerfield Partners. ACTION REQUIRED: By motion, approve the revised Proposal for use of Albert Park Stadium and Baseball Field by Centerfield Partners, and direct staff to return with a final one-year Agreement for approval at the first meeting in October. Encls. Attachment A Revised Proposal to bring Minor League Baseball to Albert Field Attachment B Correspondence from the public Attachment A August 24, 2011 Ms. Carlene McCart Director, Community Services City of San Rafael 618 B Street San RafaeL CA 94901 RE: Revige -mm Baseball Albert Fie d .4 RMpgW 19 brim hfin—or -Le o Dear Ms. McCart, After careful consideration, Centerfield Partners, by way of this letter, is submitting a revised application for a use agreement to play professional minor league baseball at Albert Park. The terms of our revised application are outlined below. We essentially propose to use the park "as is", with limited seating expansion and no change to existing perimeter fence lines. A 1 year non-exclusive lease, ftom Effective Date to September 30, 2012. 2. Sc—hedule. As before, would play 45 regular season it between late May and September. Season schedules would be negotiated with the City in accordance with the procedures and conditions previously set forth in our original application. 3. EM. As before, we would pay $80 per field hour, and an additional S40 per hour when lights are used. The City would grant Centerfield Partners $5,000 in fee credits for permanent improvements, as agreed and approved by the City. We estimate this would generate $35,000 in revenue to the City (gross revenue, before any $5,000 credit is applied). 4. Se ,ating Cap"ily Adi squents. We would add approximately 100 field level seats (in jIL _ accordance with our original application). For clarity, we would not add temporary bleachers and we would not increase capacity beyond what is currently, and what historically has been, permitted. 5. Site IM2rgvqmen d F ce Line-. We would agree to make several safety and cosmetic j§ ga _en improvements to Albert Field: a- New backstop net to replace the chicken wire, to be installed by the City - b. New field -level fence in front of dugouts for player and field -seating slial c. Clean up grandstand, dugouts and locker rooms. For clarity, the existing fence lines would define the perimeter of the facility as they do today, and all ballgame activities would be contained within the existing perimeter. 6. _EMWed jrgffic Assuming (as before) 80% of fans arrive by car and 2.5 fans per car, with 500 fans we would expect 160 cars, and with 700 fans we would expect 224 cars. 7. Parkj= Fans would park at the San Rafael Corporate Center (as before). Parking would be five. The team would not use the Community Center parking lot 8. NQjV. We intend to operate within the guidelines of the existing ordinance. Further, we would not play music or conduct on -field between -inning entertainment after 900p. adgly and S . We would hire a local security firm, to provide security in the parking lot, around the ballpark perimeter, and inside the ballpark. No tailgating would be permitted. 10. CgnMs jM. As has historically been done, we would operate temporary conmsions, including the sale of beer and wine, in the existing areas within the fence line. 11. Akgh<—)l hjmg== We would use the techniques from the TEAM (Techniques for Effective Alcohol Management) program that nearly every sports and entertainment arena utilizes. In addition to this training program we will not allow alcohol consumption in the parking lot or around the ballpark perimeter; no one will be allowed to bring alcoholic beverages into the ballpark, no alcohol will be served after the '�h inning and no one will be served more than two alcoholic beverages at one time. M am Met 1111111 i i ii 11;1IN ;iiiijllj; w we believe it should be reasonable for the City to find our proposed use is an acceptable use of Albert Field. Sincerely, —Y Brian Clark CEO, Centerfield Partners Dotty E. Lei Lid Green 8 Willow Street San Rafitel, CA 94901 4 Fax.- 415485-1044 (SENT VIA EMAIL ATTACHMENT) City of i �k fiis 1400 Fifth Avenue r Rafael, 9490 1_1943 ON W111,410 baseball r Albert Park Fm -i understands ,rrarr r. concerns raised the below delineated changes to their original Proposal in, an aftempt to address the manj by ►us residents of i rr sr+ communitiesthe Albert Park � � a As such, C" believes that it is inilimper to prejudge the outcome of an already agreed upon independent IS, and that it is finpwative that the IS should move forward to its own conclusions regardless of any modificatiow that CP may make to the eAstiag Proposal. To do otherwise wouldundermine#.. desiredcredibilityof the iand thehug4thoseiii " the. Proposal. i # # The effects of displacement of manyBay Arm amateurandsemi-protearasnow ii. the Park generalHow the bewfit, if any, to the City coffers, the downtown businesses and the public in be t S-7RES) ii ` i e ° } 4 a ► i i i i tea. a �. t # . ° t. + t i #. # ' t CP must openly and thoroughly addrm the following Wpics: con"ons, and responsibilities of the parties to &e contract, including the issue of Assignment to do-d-pardes of any delmeated, rcR)onstbdIIAe& The resulting Apvemmt should t" of a type in substance, and form that is consistentwith that of } between two mcorporatedentities that are mi aformalbusiness relattonshipnd not that of t ' facilities use permit Sincerely, Greg # t..Mayor Damon # # t # Council # i'' Barba , out t ! " Mr. Marc Levine, Council Member Ms. Nancy Mackie, City Manager . Serv], # of #i i I 6 d (SENT VIA EMAIL ATFACHM NT) AlbertBorn, Mayor City of Rafael ,00 Fifth Avenue As you acenrately acknowledged during Tuesday night's meeting, there is a great deal of distrust among of # fmunity gu&eholders who are involved discussing#times, this, has even * i contentious debate, # # because forgotten dunng the discussions focusthe fiuA that the of discussion i i not# ti pro -baseball or i in my opinion, n should sit mcil with Mr Clark and his !capitalists it provides dxm vdth exactly what they appear to be looking fiw long4erm — four teams and four potential stadiums 'in four market wgptents with enough geographical distance between each of In my opmion,those, conducting ft hutiaj, EnvmnnmtgReview should 2'# solicit and 4 property values in the Albert Park am and consequential loss of property tax tevenue to the City, should the CP proposal be adopted with Albert Park as its venue Mayor,Cc: (Via Fmail) Vice * : # #. f Council Member,�). ft Connolly Council Member, Ms. Barbara Heller Council Mernber� Mr. Marc Levine City Manager, # # # } 4 1 Eno, On- 1,711=iMsEzilm Carlene McCart From: _. �-- Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 12:35 PM To: Carlene McCart Subject: Albert Park Commercial Use - Changing the Tactics Carlene, and other City Council members, and the Mayor ... It has come to my attention that Centerfield Partners has changed their mind about paying for the study about the impact of 45 nights of commercial baseball at Albert Park. They want to ignore all of us who will be affected (sonically, for me, as the sound of amplified music and announcements will interfere with the existing peacefulness of the neighborhood I chose to invest in), using a one-year contract instead of three years to avoid any public review. I am not surprised. These are "business men," as they have said. I see them as slippery, dishonest, disrespectful, and greedy. They want to use our park as a foothold to their greater franchises in the area. Being stepped on this way hurts us. If Centerfield is going to be allowed to go ahead, then I request and require that NO AMPLIFIED MUSIC be played at all, before, during, or after any of the 45 games. I must also request and require that the City of San Rafael SHARE EQUALLY IN THE PROFITS that Centerfield makes. There are many other problems that my community faces in addition, which I am sure you are aware of. Please don't ignore us. There is not enough benefit to the city of San Rafael to give Centerfield these rights. --Catherine "Tndill Yo�ing Carlene, Bringing minor league baseball to Gerstle Park is a bad idea. It only hurts the residents of Gerstle Park. It does nothing positive for us, only negative. It is your job to serve your constituents, not yourselves for purposes of greed and profit. You will hurt our lives by doing this. We will have more crime, less park, less parking, less peace, less quiet, etc. so that YOU can have money. Do you actually know why BART does not run to Marin? Because Marin County put a stop to it when it originally was mapped out around the Bay Area, because we want a nice lifestyle. Minor league baseball teams are for armpit cities like Hayward, Brentwood, Oakley, or even Santa Rosa. Is that what you want for San Rafael? Armpit status? You will not be re-elected. You will not be remembered as a positive City Council member. Instead, you will be known as the clown that brought hicks, criminals, and public nuisance to San Rafael. People will despise you. Your choice... Merit Toutjian San Rafael, CA 94901 -----Original Message ----- From: Damon Connolly [mailto: Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 2:08 PM To:GannonB] Cc: Greg Brockbank; Barbara Heller; Al Boro; Marc Levine Subject: Re: Albert Field -Benefits? Brian: I'm not sure what statements you are referring to that I allegedly made. I think the one reference to an "opinion" was the specific discussion you and I had regarding your views on how far minor league baseball players are likely to hit home runs relative to major league players and the fence height that you believe would be required to deal w/ such home runs. That was the sum total of any instance where I referenced anything about your "opinion," and it was limited to you alone and not any group's "entire agenda." Your suggestion to the contrary is inaccurate. I have been open minded throughout this process and have spent considerable time listening to the community (with all different points of view) as part of the sub -committee with Mayor Boro looking at all of the issues and impacts. We have now been presented with a revised proposal by Centerfield that will undergo further consideration and review. As before, we will solicit community input as part of our deliberations, and I know that an additional community meeting with the sub- committee is being planned. I welcome any continued input you may have individually, as well as from other affected groups and parties. But let's get the facts straight about what was said and done. Damon On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:06 PM, GannonBJ < > wrote: As you know, several hundred citizens of San Rafael from four different neighborhoods surrounding Albert Field have joined together to form Citizens for Albert Park (CAP). Please keep in mind that only one of those groups is the Southern Heights Neighborhood Association representing 300 households and approximately 900 citizens who are unanimously opposed. You personally have been very critical of our entire agenda as representing our "opinion". The points we raised about the wisdom, or lack thereof, of bringing professional baseball to Albert Field are based on hundreds of hours of research done by dozens of citizens. This effort included: Finding, reading, and transmitting to the City Council numerous articles on the financial impacts experienced by other municipalities Phone calls to staff members at other Cities currently building baseball facilities to ask specific questions about liability, financial impacts, traffic, noise, etc. The resulting information and contact information was shared with you at the Subcommittee meetings and via email. Approximately 25 hrs was spent researching the issue of the City's liability regarding baseballs leaving the field and causing injury to passersby and/or property damage. A detailed set of CAD drawings including a budget was provided to you and to Mayor Boro. The names and contact information for the principals contacted was provided to you and Mayor Boro. We recommended that you contact these professionals and ask them directly about the issue of fencing and the liabilities associated with allowing projectiles to leave the field at speeds in the 80-100 mph range. Hundreds of hours spent combing the internet for other relevant materials on the environmental impacts to the community like noise, traffic, parking, etc. All of this research was provided to the City Council Days of effort by three citizens walking the downtown San Rafael area talking to local merchants to find out how they felt about it. The results were overwhelmingly anti -Proposal and demonstrated that the Chamber Of Commerce was out -of -touch with the merchants. These results were shared with the City Council. Hundreds of email messages and phone calls; dozens of meetings both large and small between CAP and the City Staff, City Council Members, and other concerned citizens. This hard work by CAP and its' supporters continues unabated. The list goes on. The point is that we are very well informed on every detail of this proposal and can debate the issue at length with anyone. In short, our opinion is very well informed. Despite being asked many times, no one from the City Council has answered our question "what are the benefits to the City of Professional baseball being played in Albert Park?" I am asking you to share with me and the rest of the citizens of San Rafael the specific benefits to the City of San Rafael. It is unacceptable for you to continue making statements like "I have to do what is best for the City" or "This is not a neighborhood park it is a community park". Statements like these avoid dealing with the very serious issues raised by CAP and the thousands of homeowners, residents, taxpayers, and voters who have joined our ranks. We want to see the studies you have read; we want to see the financial data that you have pored over; we want to know that you have read and understand the information we have transmitted to you. Please give us some reason to believe that this is not just your opinion, but rather an informed opinion as is ours. Thank you Brian Gannon TO: Mayor Boro, City Council Members, City Manager and Director of Community Services: We have been residents of Gerstle Park for the past twenty plus years. We are firmly opposed to bringing professional baseball to Albert Park and we intend to fight the proposal for whatever it takes. The reasons for our opposition have been specifically addressed by us in a previous email to each of you, but suffice it to say that we do not believe the City is acting in the best interests of the citizens of the surrounding neighborhoods. We are in full agreement with Brian Gannon's email letter below to Damon Connolly. Robert and Mary Butler Hello Councilman Damon: When will the Council show proper respect to the citizens of San Rafael? After being at the meetings where you have been in attendance it has become obvious that the Mayor and you (conveniently selected to be the sub committee for the Alberts Park Development) have no regard for the environment nor financial future of the City of San Rafael. It is beyond common sense that you and the Mayor have not put a final stop to the waste of our City's scant financial resources for promoting the Centerfield Developers. Despite the effort to prevent the community from learning about the plan to take over our Park, by the Council and Mayor, we have learned about the plan and have requested a environmental study be done. It was agreed to be done, the initial study, at the last community meeting. Now, there is another loop hole you and the Developers are trying to sneak through by down grading the original Proposal. We, the people, are not stupid nor are we willing to put up with this type of blatant misuse of your ELECTED authority. It is time for you and the rest of the Council to stop abusing your position to secure the use of a public park for a profit seeking group of Developers. Please realize that you are elected not by the Developers but by the residents of the City of San Rafael. Put your efforts towards helping improve our City not to degrade it with public sale of alcohol and traffic problems in the future. Sincerely, Claudia and Jim Pauloo. I am a resident of Gerstle Park. My family and I are VERY much in FAVOR of Centerfield Partner's proposal for pro baseball at Albert Park. Please do not let a vocal minority stop a great opportunity for San Rafael and our families. Please approve the plan so we can play ball! Bob Lenz San Rafael, CA 94901 Dear Mayor Boro, I'm writing in support of the pro baseball team at Albert Park. I understand that there is presently a proposal in front of the San Rafael City Council by Centerfield Partners to bring a pro baseball team to play at Albert's park. I'd like you to vote in favor of this measure to bring baseball "back" to San Rafael. It's a long standing tradition within America that instills wonderful family values and my family will certainly attend these games. It will also generate revenue for the City of San Rafael. Sincerely, Carter Edgerton Good morning, I am writing this morning in the hopes that you folks WILL APPROVE PRO BASEBALL AT ALBERT PARK. I live nearby and would welcome the opportunity to take my young kids to the games. What a nice addition to our community this would be! Please pass the bill and allow baseball at Albert Park. Thank You. Christopher Carey San Rafael Christopher Carey ( CA DRE License: 01212515 N M LS#: 377644 • Real Estate Equity Loans • High -yield Trust Deed Investments • Asset-based Business Loans Our investors earn 8% or more, safely & securely, using their savings & IRA accounts. www.PacificPrivateMoney.com Downtown Office: 1604 Grant Avenue • Novato, CA 94945 (415) 883-2150 ext 104 (866) 521-0418 Fax Sounds like a positive impact will be created by having this baseball game, I can only assume it will bring families and friends together and more money for the local businesses and city. sounds like a win win situation! Thanks, Milton Davis Jr Davis Sign Co., Inc. 36 Belvedere St. Suite 2, San Rafael, CA. 94901 PH: 415.457.4091 FX: 415.457.5754 www.dscsigns.com Dear Friends, There is presently a proposal in front of the San Rafael City Council by Centerfield Partners to bring a pro baseball team to play at Albert park field. The facility would be upgraded and tax revenue would be generated from these games. More importantly, San Rafael families would be able to attend local professional baseball games here in town that are affordable and fun. Plus this would be a family friendly event ... The Parks and Recreation Commission unanimously approved of this plan and my family is in support as well. It's my understanding that there is a small number of people voicing their concern about the plan. The issues stem from parking, traffic, sound and security which must be addressed. There have been three different presentations by Centerfield Partners and a contract with the City will have guarantees to ensure a balanced approached. At this point no neighborhood organizations have come out against the plan, just individuals. If you would like to see this pro baseball proposal be given a chance to go forward, please contact our city council members by email (below) and let your voice be heard. if the council does not hear from a large number of citizens in favor of this proposal it will fail. Kindest regards, Carter Edgerton City Council Emails Greg Brockbank I am the Jrs. commissioner (12-14 year old) for SRLL. 1 also manage the Jrs. San Rafael baseball team, have a son and a daughter, and a business and home in San Rafael. 1 have also been deeply involved in improving the San Rafael fields. Pro baseball at Albert filed would be excellent for San Rafael's community. I am always on the look out for ways to improve the playing conditions of our local fields, and this would be a big one. It is my understanding that the San Rafael little league Jrs would continue to be able to use this field during our season. If that is the case, I see this as a major improvement for our league, and for the entire community. It will improve one of our key playing fields at absolutely no cost to the city. My family will look forward to riding our bikes to the games. I represent the many parents of players of the San Rafael Little league, and I say absolutely yes to allowing pro baseball in San Rafael, as long as San Rafael little league Jrs level may continue to use the field. Brian Joyce President San Rafael Field Foundation SRLL Jrs Commissioner San Rafael Jrs Manager San Rafael resident San Rafael City Council, I live at Bret Harte Rd., San Rafael and vote in every election. I am also on the Board of the San Rafael Little League. I have two boys ages 8 and 6 who love baseball. We live a few blocks from Albert Field. We would be delighted to have professional baseball played there on the weekends. My boys and I could walk down to the games and spend a fun, family -friendly evening watching baseball. I do not want a few dissenters to ruin this possibility for the rest of us. This is an incredibly important issue for me, my family, and my friends. Please do the right thing and allow professional baseball at Albert Field. Thanks. Thomas Weathers, Esq. Qawalangin Tribe of Unalaska (Aleut) Alexander, Berkey, Williams & Weathers LLP 2030 Addison St., Suite 410 Berkeley, CA 94704 ph (510) 548-7070 fax (510) 548-7080 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail (and any attachment thereto) contains confidential information belonging to the sender and intended only for use by the addressee. It may constitute a privileged attorney-client communication. If you are not the addressee, or if you have received this e-mail in error, please do not disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on this information. Such action is prohibited. Any unauthorized intentional interception of this transmission is illegal. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then destroy all copies of this e-mail. IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax -related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein. Thank you. I live only a few blocks from Albert Field and I vote in every election. I would like to voice my support for professional baseball at Albert Field. I attended the community meeting at San Rafael Community Center on August 411 and I understand the concerns of the community. However, I do believe that the city officials and Centerfield Partners have addressed many of their concerns and are more than willing to work with local residents to make this work for everyone. What the opponents are missing is that this will be an incredible way to BUILD community. Local families will come together to have fun in a non-destructive, supportive environment to root on a local team. Many of these families will walk or ride bikes which will alleviate the traffic concerns. This will be a safe place for High School students to come with friends... and they have little opportunity for this now. In addition, I have been to many minor league baseball parks and am amazed at how much marketing is done for local businesses. No wonder the Chamber of Commerce is in support of the baseball team. There are contests, giveaways, announcements etc. all advertising LOCAL businesses... which is what we need to do to keep the San Rafael business community vital AND to keep sales tax dollars HERE. I speak for myself, my family and my friends in wholehearted support of bringing professional baseball to Albert Park. Please do the right thing for local families and businesses!! Thank you! Melina Shepherd Dear San Rafael City Council Members, K8vhusband and | have lived inSan Rafael for 23years and raised our two children here. We were active inLittle League and inthe SRH8baseball program for four years. yNyfamily urges you toapprove the plan tobring baseball huAlbert Park. Now more that ever, families and teenagers need safe, affordable venues for entertainment. While there are difficulties with any change iostatus quo, the issues raised by the opponents do not in my opinion, outweigh all the good that can come from this. Let's bring some good old-fashioned sense Vfwhat itiatobeon American toSan Rafael. Baseball and Apple Pie! Please vote yes! Sincenely, Lori B. Coleman Dear Mr. Boro, My wife and I oppose the proposal to have a pro minor league team play at Albert Park. We are concerned about the problems that plague pro -sporting events, including violence, gang activity, alcohol consumption, litter, traffic, and parking. We understand that the vast majority of people attending these events are good, law- abiding folks. However, history shows that it is inevitable that some who attend will not act responsibly and the cost to San Rafael, both in policing bad behavior and in the quality of life for residents, is just too high. Please vote against the proposal to allow pro baseball at Albert Park. Daniel Bacon San Rafael, CA 94901 Dear Mr. Brockbank, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Levine, Ms. Heller and Mr. Boro: Hi, myname isKim Lofrano.Iama single parent of two San Rafael Little League players and l think it would be so much fun to have the opportunity Lotake my children to watch pro baseball atAlbert's Field. What agreat event for families, especially those that can't necessarily afford Uo drive all the way hothe city, pay for gas, pay for parking and buy Giants tickets. I used to go see the San Jose Giants play when I lived on the Peninsula and i1was just a great time for parents and kids. We have a terrific connnnuntyof people who love baseball in all of our towns /n Marin. What great opportunity for San Rafael to make little money and provide nice, safe environment for families in Marin toget together for some wholesome family fun! l would definitely frequent those games with nnykids! Ihope you'll consider mywords! Thank you for your time. Most sincerely, 0mLofrano I have heard many positive things regarding the pro baseball proposal for Albert's Park. 1 think this would be a great addition to San Rafael and many families would benefit from it. How nice would it be to go to downtown San Rafael to see a baseball game instead of San Francisco or Oakland? People would save money on gas by seeing a game here and the money revenues would help San Rafael. I don't really see anything negative for having this go forward and I will for sure vote for it in our next election. Thank you. Linda Roland Dear Members of the San Rafael City Council, I've been an active volunteer in the community, volunteering with Carol Mills and DFA for years when my kids were little before I went back to work. I've since been an active member of the Glenwood PTA and the San Rafael HeadsUp Foundation, and was very involved in developing the Andy's Summerfest (now Summerfest) event to support San Rafael City Schools. I continue to enjoy living in Glenwood, and my son Liam has played baseball in the SRLL since he was 5. I would absolutely love to see a semi-professional baseball team come to Albert Park. I think it makes so much sense now, as local businesses are struggling in this economy, to bring an event to downtown San Rafael that has the potential to attract families from outside the city to come visit beautiful downtown San Rafael. I can already taste the hot dogs and imagine the endless conversations that my son and I will have about player stats. And in a community that struggles with the challenges of economic and cultural division, I see this as an opportunity to bring people together. So, I want to encourage you all to vote yes for this proposal --I'm ready to buy my tickets! Cheers, Cristine Cristine Dewey ro*co films international, llc Sausalito, CA 94965 Dear Mayor and Council Members, I have spoken with some people who live in that area who are against the idea and I agree. I am all for having the benefits of minor league baseball in San Rafael. The pro people spend most of their agreement over the virtues of baseball. That is NOT the point. The problem is the location. It would work better out by the McInnis golf course or someplace where it will not interfere with traffic, parking and noise to neighborhoods that (most of which) want peace and quite. Regardless of how they downplay the concerns, there would be traffic problems and noise problems and parking problems. (I have read over some of the pro emails going around) Please tell them to find another location. Thanks kindly, Daniel Daniel B. Holeman San Rafael, CA Dear Council Members, I am a homeowner in San Rafael and would like you to know that I support professional baseball atAlbert Park. At58years old and with ason just graduated from San Rafael High School, |was involved inthe youth baseball community aaavolunteer for many years. | also have anK8.8. Degree in Parks and Recreation from San Francisco State University and could speak at length about the benefits of positive recreation activities for youth, adults, and seniors. Personally, | would really enjoy attondinggannea-enhoncingthequa|ityofmy|ife. I'm confident that our Community Services staff will do a fine job working to ensure the safety and enjoyment of all participants - and addressing any concerns from the neighboring communities. The park was built for baseball -along time ago. Please support the history ofSan Rafael and the benefits oforenovated ballpark for everyone. Thank you very much for your ongoing service to San Rafael. |tissincerely appreciated. Ron Hamilton To whom it may concern, 1 am a resident of San Rafael and think having a pro baseball field and team in San Rafael would be wonderful for the city's economy and the community. Please consider the proposal to build a site! Rebecca Thompson I have lived in San Rafael for 17 years, and have been involved in Little League baseball here since my son started t -ball almost 10 years ago. This year, as a player at the Juniors level, my son had the opportunity to play baseball on the big field, at Albert Park. What a thrill for him and for the other boys. Albert Park is a great field, and although it has been in some disrepair over the last several years, I feel confident that it can become great again. The plan to bring minor league baseball to Albert Park will give thousands of Marin baseball fans a chance to see high-quality baseball at an affordable price. Just as important, from my perspective, it will give San Rafael youth baseball players a chance to play some of their own games on an excellent field, that is well-designed and well-maintained. I am sure that the neighbors close to Albert Park will have some concerns about the proposal, and these concerns should be taken seriously. Even so, I hope you can work out a way to allow the Albert Park baseball proposal to proceed. I can see a lot of benefits for the City. Most important, I can see extensive benefits for the hundreds of kids who play baseball every year in San Rafael. Sincerely, Josh Libresco San Rafael, CA 94901 Please consider this another vote for pro baseball at Albert's Park! It is, after all, a baseball diamond. What a great event for families to attend ---imagine if Albert's Park was what it was intended to be instead of a homeless encampment. I have no doubt that the loudest voices are from the few who oppose this. It has been a discussion amongst the parents in my school district (Sun Valley) and the youth sports leagues (SRYSC & SRLL). I have only heard of support FOR the proposal. I hope more of those for it take the time to make their voice heard. Regards, Jen Oliver President I Shooting Stars Productions .- ___ -- Voted as one of the top 100 Bay Area Women -Owned Businesses by SF Business Times. Council Contact Form � �� '��"�� 0r �� V�� w�"�� `�� p�� ~~�� ~�� '�� `°~�0�0� ��n��w�n�� = �� Contact �� rm Thank you for visiting the City of San Rafael website. This hnnn is available to facilitate contacting our Mayor and Councilmembers concerning topics of interest to the community. Please contact the City Manager's office at 415-485-3070 for any additional assistance. *Fimst Name my/es * Last Name Miller Address City San Rafael State [A Zip Code 94901 * Send email tm(select one) Mayor Albert ]. Bono * Please enter your questions/comments below Mr. Boro, I'm writing you to show you my support for Centerfie|d partners and their idea for Alberts Park. l am very active in our community and have not talked to anyone who is against having professional baseball at Alberts. I believe the opponents are a small yet vocal minority. Most of us have assumed wrongly that this was going to pass without much debate. We were wrong. l encourage you to vote yes for professional baseball at Alberts Park. Thank you. Myles Council Contact Form City of San Rafael City Council Contact Form Thank you for visiting the City of San Rafael website. This form is available to facilitate contacting our Mayor and Councilmembers concerning topics of interest to the community. Please contact the City Manager's office at 415-485-3070 for any additional assistance. * First Name Karin * Last Name Donlan Address 1 Address 2 City San Rafael State Ca Zip Code 94903 Phone Number * Fmail Address * Send email to (select one) Mayor Albert I Boro * Please enter your questions/ comments below Yes to baseball at Albert Park!! Council Contact Form � �� ~�� 0r �� «�� '� w�� m�x�� w��°�� ~�� City Council ~~-_ �� "� ��~ Contact ��N[��Ny ��rm Thank you for visiting the City of San Rafael website. This form is available to facilitate contacting our Mayor and Councilmembers concerning topics of interest to the community. Please contact the City Manager's office at 415-485-3070 for any additional assistance. *Fimst Name Peter * Last Name Rudy Address 1 Address City San Rafael State CA Zip Code 94901 r2t,-~-w,.°°h=, * Email Address * Send email tm(select one) Mayor Albert l8oru * Please enter your questons/mmmmmmemtmbeUono Please count me as one of your many constituents in favor of pro baseball at Albert Park. While l understand the concerns of the minority voicing their opposition, I believe those concerns have been adnessed and will be respected by the team's management. Pro baseball in San Rafael will be boon tothe entire community and our businesses downtown. Let's not let slip away another great opportunity to bolster the sagging fortunes of this town. Regards, Peter Rudy Dear City Council Members, I am writing you today to voice my strong support for the Centerfield Partners proposed professional baseball at Alberts Park. As a Marin County native, San Rafael resident and voter, father of 2 kids and former collegiate baseball player I feel this would be a wonderful addition to the city/community of San Rafael. The thought of being able to get on a bike, or walk to a professional baseball game is one that is more than just appealing it is, to coin a phrase from San Francisco Giants announcer Mike Krukow, AWESOME. I have played many baseball games growing up at Alberts Park and can think of nothing better than to restore this first class facility for use by a professional baseball team. For my kids it would be a wonderful experience to see a professional game without the high costs and commute commitment that the Giants/A's game requires.. Please consider this when reviewing and vote in favor of bringing baseball to San Rafael. Sincerely, Dan Lovette San Rafael Hello Al , My husband and I live in Gerstle Park and we say YES to the purposed ball park . It will bring in the much needed tax dollar for our poor city and lots of family fun ! PLAY BALL !!!! Katherine Louden 538 D street San Rafael Council Contact Form City of San Rafael City Council Contact Form Thank you for visiting the City of San Rafael website. This form is available to facilitate contacting our Mayor and Councilmembers concerning topics of interest to the community. Please contact the City Manager's office at 415-485-3070 for any additional assistance. * First Name Shauna * Last Name Rudy Address 1 Address 2 City San Rafael State CA Zip Code 94901 Phone Number * Email Address * Send email to (select one) Mayor Albert J. Boro * Please enter your questions/comments below Dear Mayor Boro, Please help to bring professional baseball to Albert Park! It would be great for San Rafael residents and businesses alike. Thank you, Shauna Rudy Council Contact Form City of San Rafael City Council Contact Form Thank you for visiting the City of San Rafael website. This form is available to facilitate contacting our Mayor and Councilmembers concerning topics of interest to the community. Please contact the City Manager's office at 415-485-3070 for any additional assistance. * First Name Greg * Last Name Stilson Address 1 Address 2 City San Rafael State CA Zip Code 94903 Phone Number * Fm�;I A" * Send email to (select one) Mayor Albert I Boro * Please enter your questions/comments below Hello Mayor Baro, My family and I would really like to see professional base ball in San Rafael, Please do what you can to make this a reality. Thanks. Council Contact Form C a ity of San Rafael City Council Contact Form Thank you for visiting the City of San Rafael website. This form is available to facilitate contacting our Mayor and Councilmembers concerning topics of interest to the community. Please contact the City Manager's office at 415-485-3070 for any additional assistance. * First Name Ken * Last Name Tong Address I Address 2 City State Zip Code Phone Number * Email Address * Send email to (select one) Mayor Albert J. Boro * Please enter your questions/ comments below Please help bring the minor baseball team to San Rafael. I've lived in cities that had minor teams and it's all about having a good time and it brings out families to the event. You want families to come out and enjoy the city, then give them a reason. There are so many pluses you can add on to a baseball game, theme nights, food trucks, just think of the possibilities. Yes, of course you will have to make sure it's safe and think of the neighborhood I get that, but I think it's feasible to control the parking and encourage using shuttles, carpools, walking, biking to the games. Council Contact Form � �� Rafael �� 0r �� "�� n�r� w�� nu�� _~�� City �� m�r�� *� ��~ �� Thank you for visiting the City of San Rafael website. This form is available to facilitate contacting our Mayor and Cnunci|membersconcerning topics ofinterest ho the community Please contact the City Manager's office at 415-485-3070 for any additional assistance. * First Name Bella &Claudette * Last Name Ferriter Address 1 Address ' City San Rafael State CA Zip Code 94903 * Send email tm(select one) Mayor Albert ]. Boro * Please enter ymwrqwemtiows/commrments below Dear Mayor Boro, Please approve our city getting a professional baseball team. What an incredible opportunity for our city. This will increase business & revenue for all of San Rafael. It'aa great thing for everyone involved! Sincerely, Coach 8e||e Ferriter Hello Al, I am a voter in San Rafael and have learned about the possibility of a baseball team coming to Alberts Park. I've looked at the plans and 1 think it would be really exciting for the city of San Rafael with very few drawbacks! I have a 9 year old son who loves baseball and I can't think of a better family oriented way to spend time than at the ballpark right in our home town! I hope you are in favor of this great possibility for San Rafael and 1'd love to hear your thoughts. Where do you stand on this topic? Best regards, Scott Ray Vice President I Equity Sales ConvergEx Group I Global Electronic Trading 222 Kearny St., 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 T: 415.400.0203 ( M: 415.271.9384 F: 415.400.0218 The information in this message, including any attachment, is confidential and intended for use only by the designated recipient(s) named above. It is the property of BNY ConvergEx Group, LLC or its affiliates. If you are not the intended recipient, please return the message to the sender and delete all copies of it, including attachments, from your computer. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination or copying of this message or any part hereof is strictly prohibited. This message is for information purposes only, is not intended to provide a sufficient basis on which to make an investment decision and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product. The information expressed herein may be changed at any time without notice or obligation to update. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure, virus -free or error -free. Therefore, we do not represent that this message is virus -free, complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. BNY ConvergEx Group, LLC and its affiliates accept no liability for any damage sustained in connection with the content or transmission of this message. Dear San Rafael City Council Members: I would like to voice my strong support for a Pro Baseball team there at Albert Park. As a long time resident of San Rafael (17 years), we have enjoyed and championed baseball as a great family activity throughout the years from Little League to baseball summer camps (our son loved the Seals baseball camps at Albert Park H) to high school baseball. My husband volunteered and umped Little League baseball for many years throughout San Rafael and Marin county and saw first hand how families came out in support as well as older kids and others in the community looking for a fun place to hang out - enjoy a hot dog and snacks and a nice afternoon/evening of fun, socializing and supporting their favorite team. Baseball brings people together from all demographics. Albert Park is centrally located and easily accessible and already is a great venue. San Rafael should embrace this terrific opportunity to bring a pro baseball team to the area. Margaret Green Dear Mayor Boro- It is my understanding that there is presently a proposal in front of the San Rafael City Councilto bring a pro baseball team to play at Albert park field. I believe that much needed tax revenue would be generated from these games. More importantly, San Rafael families and other Marin families would be able to attend local professional baseball games here in town that are affordable and fun. I would like to express my SUPPORT of this plan! Sports activities are a great way to keep families in San Rafael, in an atmosphere of fun, healthy competition! I love the idea! Please continue to vote in favor of this. Sincerely, Pamela Champion Franklin,. Ph.D. San Rafael, CA 94901 Dear Mayor Boro, I would like to share my view on the Pro Baseball discussion around Albert Park As a San Rafael resident, this would be a great addition to our community. It would be wonderful to have local, cost effective, professional baseball being played so close to home. It also seems that it would only be positive in terms of the contribution to the city's tax revenues and people coming to downtown. I recognize that some individuals have expressed concerns though these seem to be addressed through the parking and other plans. The reality is the field was likely there before most if not all of them bought their houses, so trying to prevent it from being used for its original purpose and for the greater good now seems to be baseless. I strongly urge you to support this initiative. You can be sure your stance on this will be something 1 look at next election time. (This and progress towards pension reform, which is another issue entirely) Thank you for your consideration, Mark Mark Abrams San Rafael, CA, 94901 Council Contact Form � �� `�� 0r �� U�� w�pm�,�� `�m�v�� .� �� ~�� ~�� City Council �� «� ��~ Contact �� Thank you for visiting the City of San Rafael website. This form is available to facilitate contacting our Mayor and Cound|members concerning topics ofinterest tothe community. Please contact the City Manager's office at 415-485-3070 for any additional assistance. * First Name Michael *Last Name Arend Address 1 Address 2 City San Rafael State ca Zip Code 94901 Phone Number *Semd email tm(select one) Mayor Albert J.Bom * Please enter your questions/comments below Dear Mayor, I am writing you in support of San Rafael having a baseball team at Albert Park. Ateam with the cities support could do great things for San Rafael. It would help keep Marin entertainment money in Marin instead of sending it to 5F or the East Bay. The proposed compromise is just a recipe for failure. Charging $20 a game for a team of the stature is way over priced and ifthat's what they have todotostay afloat they are going tofail. You can get a decent ticket to see the A's for the same price. The great thing about minor league baseball is that it's a cheap night out of entertainment that you can take the whole family to. Don't let afew spoilsports ruin itfor everyone. Mike Arend Council Contact Form City of San Rafael City Council Contact Form Thank you for visiting the City of San Rafael website. This form is available to facilitate contacting our Mayor and Councilmembers concerning topics of interest to the community Please contact the City Manager's office at 415-485-3070 for any additional assistance. * First Name Pat * Last Name Ford Address 1 Address 2 City San Rafael State Ca Zip Code 94901 * Send email to (select one) Mayor Albert I Boro * Please enter your questions/comments below Hello Mayor Boro, I am writing to you in favor of baseball at Albert Park . My wife and I,who alwways vote,and two Little League sons would like your support on this issue. We live in Gerstle Park and are not concerned about a little more noise or traffic. Thank you, Pat Ford and Kay Bolla Council Contact Form City of San Rafael City Council Contact Form Thank you for visiting the City of San Rafael website. This form is available to facilitate contacting our Mayor and Councilmembers concerning topics of interest to the community. Please contact the City Manager's office at 415-485-3070 for any additional assistance. * First Name Miya * Last Name chambers Address 1 Address 2 City san rafael State CA Zip Code 94903-1231 Phone Number * Send email to (select one) Mayor Albert I Baro * Please enter your questions/comments below Please consider bringing pro baseball to Albert Park! We would love to take our little league kids to see the "Real Stuff" right here in our back yard! What a treat and great for the county! I am in favor of the council and you as mayor to support this agenda for a professional baseball team here in our town. Lee Sweeney San Rafael, CA 94901 Michael A. Soldavini San Rafael, CA 94901 (SENT VIA EMAIL ATTACHMENT) September 12, 2011 Re: Centerfield Partners LLC Proposal to Bring Professional Baseball to Albert Part - Honorable Albert J. Boro, Mayor City of San Rafael 1400 Fifth Avenue San Rafael, CA 94901-1943 Dear Mayor Boro: The contents of my prior letters to you dated July 14, 2011 and August 11, 2011 are incorporated herein by reference. I was present at the July 18, 2011 City Council meeting on the captioned subject and each of the two subsequent Community Meetings that were presided over by you and Councilman Connelly on August 4, 2011 and August 9, 2011. 1 am writing to you this time to share my observations and concerns on various matters which I believe are pertinent to this proposal in the hope that you and the Council might find them useful. Please be guided accordingly. The Centerfield Partners, LLC ("CP") proposal was originally presented to the City as a public/private venture that would have a potential duration of at least 3 years. After several meetings with various civic groups, CP made its formal presentation to the City Council at its Regular Meeting on July 18, 2011. At the conclusion of an extremely long public comment period, you formed a sub -committee of the City's Finance Committee and nominated yourself and Mr. Connelly to co-chair this sub -committee. Its stated purpose was to schedule and conduct subsequent Community Meetings with those residents who voiced objections to the CP proposal in order to address and mitigate the possible negative impacts associated with noise, traffic, parking, and neighborhood safety. The two Community Meetings that followed on August 4, 2011 and August 9, 2011 identified many issues of concern to residents, in addition to those mentioned above, and resulted in a promise by CP to fund an Initial Study of Environmental Impact ("IS"). Its purpose was to factually assess the identified issues and report on whether or not the proposed use of Albert Field would have a detrimental impact on the residents of the various neighborhoods under discussion. Regrettably, CP has now opted to revise and scale back its initial proposal in the hope of avoiding the expense of conducting the IS. This approach has left a very bad taste in the mouths of many residents who feel that this is a means of disguising what appears to be the first stage of a more ambitious project, and a ploy to circumvent the process. The IS is viewed by many residents as being essential, as it provides a neutral and objective means of addressing their concerns. I strongly recommend that, in the interest of fostering trust in the comminifty, that any consideration to abandon the IS not be justified based upon an unsubstantiated and projected reduction in the use of the Park facilities. Regardless of the ultimate length of Term of any definitive Lease/Use Agreement, (one, two, or three years), the annual impact on the Park facilities and surrounding neighborhoods will likely remain the same. Forty-five games per year is still 45 games/yr no matter how one looks at it. Only a proper IS can determine the extent of impact on the neighborhoods, and whether mitigation of identified areas of impact is viable. Another concern that I want to raise rests with the perception that many residents have that their extensive research and personal observations offered for consideration to the Council are being marginalized by the Council by being called merely personal "opinions" and inconsistent with the Council's "position" on the matter. These remarks only foster resentment and undermine the trust that has been acknowledged by you as being so desperately lacking in these proceedings. Other comments and actions that undermine the community's trust include the extremely vague responses offered by City staff to the questions raised by the residents during these Community Meetings, the constant reminders that the Albert Park facilities are "Community" facilities and not "Neighborhood" facilities when, in fact, there is no such distinction, since the community is comprised of its neighborhoods, and we are all residents of San Rafael. And, while I am on the topic of fostering and maintaining the public's trust, I respectfully urge you to address the reasons behind the need to have held a closed door session with Mr. Clark and Mr. Shapiro of Centerfield Partners, along with Mr. Connelly, Mr. Epstein, and other City staff immediately after concluding the public portion of the August 9, 2011 Community Meeting. Many residents are asking why the public was excluded from these continuing discussions concerning CP's use of the Albert Field assets. For my part, I continue to research the historical aspects of Albert Field and, in so doing-, I find the deed conveying the Park to the City of San Rafael to be of crucial importance. Of particular concern are the following paragraphs which seem to prohibit any long term commercial use of z:1 the Park. I'm certain that you will find them of interest as well. "THIRD: Said real property shall never be sold nor otherwise disposed of nor leased except as herein provided. FOURTH: The board, commission or agency havinZ the control of said real property shall have the power and the power is hereby given, in its absolute discretion, to rent the whole or any -portion of said real property for compensation for periods not exceeriin one ,1. wcek in duration for suchur oses as said commission may deem proper together with the power to provide either with or without compensation the use of said real property for public exhibitions, concerts or other enterprises conducted by any non-profit fraternal or charitable organization within said city for charitable and civic purposes.... SIXTH: Said city shall own, manage and control said real property in its governmental capacity in all respects except as herein provided with respect to the occasional renting or leasing of said real property." (Emphasis added.) Excerpted from the Deed of Albert Park to the City of San Rafael executed by Jacob and Annie Albert on the 8th day of May, 1937. -WHEREAS Jacob Albert and Annie Albert, his wife, have tendered to the City of San Rafael their certain deed conveying to said City for Park, Playground and Public Recreational purposes a large tract of land lying East on B Street in said City and known as "Dufficy Field.... NOW THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Rafael, California, that the generous gift of Jacob Albert and Annie Albert, his wife, evidenced by said conveyance, be and the same is hereby accepted in behalf of said City, upon the terms, uses, conditions and reservations therein contained." (Emphasis added.) Excerpted from City of San Rafael Resolution No. 735, which was duly adopted by the San Rafael City Council at its Adjourned Regular meeting on Monday the Tenth day of May, 1937, and recorded together with the above referenced Deed. I'm not an attorney; however, in light of the terms and conditions profiled in the above referenced sections of Mr. Albert's deed, it would appear that the City Council is prohibited outright from approving the CP proposal to bring professional baseball to Albert Field if it intends to do so for a period of time exceeding one week in duration. These preclusions seem to be very specific and without alternative remedy. I've attached a copy of Mr. Albert's deed for your convenience. The entirety of Mr. Albert's deed can also be found on microfiche in the County Recorder's office. From my perspective, and in view of the provisions contained within Mr. Albert's deed, it appears that a modicum of research would have prevented this entire matter from becoming one grand, unnecessary, and costly debacle that is potentially riddled with legal improprieties. I only hope that the manner in which this matter was handled is not indicative of how the City of San Rafael conducts its business on a regular basis. Sincerely, Vic Wof9-ni Distribution: (Via Email Attachment) Mr. Greg Brockbank, Vice Mayor Mr. Damon Connolly, Council Member Ms. Barbara Heller, Council Member Mr. Marc Levine, Council Member Ms. Nancy Mackle, City Manager Ms. Carlene McCart, Director of Community Services Mr. Robert Epstein, City Attorney Mr. Brian Clark, CEO Centerfield Partners, LLC Mr. Mike Shapiro, Esq., Attorney, Centerfield Partners, LLC Mr. Brian Sobel, Consultant, Centerfield Partners, LLC Communities for Albert Park, Steering Committee Members 4 341 0 IZ !l ' 7:,s j�jvnnryq We thin Ah dnW of lay, IY7, hohloon T, �,"':IRT rol'.1 o!" San TMAle" Unforria, the partins of M! 05st PwA, am! 2VT _� WN 9A"EW 1-1-arllcipal (.Oranoration, Awato in the loanty of Min, sync of 20"Orma, to? party of t. no noenm part, To I T N E S S F 11 A Thatfor '(n'! In Cr rn'-lamstlon of f.i1C d ollre of the _irot par- V- � 000 W coatributo to .1n3 of the porple of nam HwCacl, to Inc.rca.-sc, tho CItyf S o V 1 s'l VY " p 1 10 '"As am! playgmumdo, Ord m1maul of W loco of too Poole UP Ban Qfvoj fez UQU t1on.al reol",at"Mrsl F Rellitios, to afAnd tho restdmtr of said GIW a pWU1c pails for nenwa- tjonal and pAn.yGpound unns, the sat 1 partino OC rho first 'pz".rt do L"y th'-'3o pre'sonts "-'rant' har- ,in an! 3011, conv,-,Y ar+(l 0011f.17 -M, untD thn amid rmrty of ',lo" nocond pflr-t' It's Iticconlove and assljna forever, all that 3ortain real proporLy S.It'tlato In the City OC San 7�a�"ac'1' County of loscribod as follows: t.'nc 1'ritoraoetion of the s"tharly line of tho rtjit of way oC the orthwostern ullroa�j any' with 4 -ho easterly line of TA. daro tr A, I,�,a If the td ?Jndai,o etended; on,,! rq'Inn1ra,; Lfteace southerly a ont t1in said emsto,.rly line of Lindaro s,treot a.,-l— t"&Od to tne ncrtoesst corner of Ant certain lot of land conveyed to nndrevi canonna by ! C. 1)u."f*t.cy, el, ux, by flood demo j:lrco!,,jber 30, 1900, W recorded In toric office of thfn, ac!.d County III ','oltmlo Jig of Do", at rate 108; Knonce north 810 56, West 07A lot Mon, the 11,1-10 of ul� sn1d Just; montionod lot to Um noMwest comer of the said %at mr;Micamfl thonro eoMmly along tho NvosterIT line, of thn anil last iwntlonod. lot to the corton lot of land to !"'11shn DuBois, A al, by TUMU97 Eahon, by Doed MA My 23, 188, and rawv"d In the Knee of t nnij ComAy ReamVer in vowme I " MUs' ct, p'�-.P' -'�lonco the rort'norly 11no the snIA l.: -tot nenti.onod Tot", 00 ,'(,ot to cot MWQMY Ine of, ,,I" Street, if the sante were axtundod; thence northerly said easterly Me o!" "A" "''rent, 75 feet to the rortlicast enrnor o,f that certein lot ot' lqr,-' -)y Armed dntod Soptnmbor 1�, .1.90) n,,chrmw, ot al, by We snAd M. 0. DuffIcy, rat pix, L'C'(nr)rdto,1 !n- tho c)fflce of W sald Count Roc,,crder In '01UP10 6) 0, DOOdS, at _ D 1,101' the •northenly line N' the said lost mentlonxi lot, 307 Mt, mom w, its. t... to the 0 "B" Most; thence noMhoMy alcn,-, tlr._ said oas".rly llirto of "B" 7trvet, f"t _n Tc Lmilhn-ly line of QM "rtain lot of lynd C ..oycd to C. re. BUTIAWt at W, 0y Dood two juse ,,,t pagn §15; thmee ah MWX �wtmly 1'T NQ , AOO' rj- Stroen 225 lot; thmen at rQ"t wqlos gyros lorly 150 Vet to tva oald nostorly line of at 01re0t, thence nortHerly alorig we sr 'tl'Ect' f"t; thmne at W ht in, -Ins Qastepiy ljo foot; Wnnoa at rn,t an,--,lon 1)(, _'Cet; t�- - 150 feet tr vo westerly Mn if "A" Street, Q MY ;"Von N,ra nXtoncrld olon"- t'nn nail Wastc ly Unn of "A" rywc-r to 'Il�' W11 0. t,:. said 7 or"hwow no% FA 4 p C �! 1 mad n"Vau, �- 1 , ""Cl n0j owsh"U- Uno 0 T� at! § 11 "t n rqy 0' U SAI� "rQw Wyer"I Y 4 W 1po';i tl-;c' rc-' n, t , corn, 7"I"A knoval Vr -"J Pai`.• I I �_ 1"' 9 mart, O"c, less. XT te :"War tow"Aif i0 -X lon W-1, 4- mad Wed Z%Jy b 1933, 0-0 worylai mrny awvK-d for ord igon tna ana Wjach to "m Nlllnvlq- lo in ' Waya Y !Y, w by - ph or"''Ic, on to ill AWM of &A Kty, ' . 400.0 3"1-1 "nn3 by co�,";Mnn or IN, b n7A or nwwasalcn jmwnG Wn muna,Lcyont and amain! of snj! rqal pro.. PWAY, anK Mal 1novoty s!,.,1' a a i�IainVhwd In poUotuity for nw Amu use ano o,orwni; 0f the pu its In nald City, T13 RD, Said roil jawparty shall iwvcr in) soU wr othwalse Wsp-3m�i of nor 10"M wn�npi: YPOVIded. 7TI7M: The boaM, commlsolon -, agr,.oy w_-, -.n;* icit, `,)MK l"imyg,n 10 aVol-- to r nt wholo or ,.ny to" on of *aid isal jwoport.y, for n"!i oxoownng Ono (1) w" In QUILIOn for suM XWP030s ,an u,ai'd oo',snlaclon n!ny !'onnr w*'th� plwnr to proJ!Ao oltinor wl'.h or Wttho-1,11' the 11ac c.)f' -_",:Ld Polio oonuej"Q Or OtMP "MerMU`,O5 Gondlclte(l Oy an -y chaMMY10 orgwIzatinn ',,jittyin wald C_'tY Mr CNYqtablo =1 &VIC Paz -poses. 1711'A Khclojil title theroto shall revort, ti"', nd t"'o OVccnL Llo C'Ity of San Infaca ohnt,j All wz;jj,j fl -e (71 frmn tho to F en l trig sada L7a� i; AV K—Inant lWomemont of said weal proparty by to cmm'troot'or. of orf; o�,.-on batayinq tank tar pool, play7rouaO W ro"wavowl inrZynowntv, w0voY'res wnrl uwuyow� Moseapiny and such Uthor Qprovwontn K a P"rruncow 0a"wo a. l UY the ;P�rmn bely OV 1'ual PrOPOVtY "Q1d nuil rqwrlon o, tlth% STMA 1" Wominod q n to q&ot civic in Mah act4j, o"13 be detomi"I cue n, =V, Mont 'Old sor-i paid "v;!."I'I'n i: slid MEY ont! oirn' 1--cnna�(" an,�i 2mPw?Y in its Fr"rMMMMI caynolty in all rvap"ta ax"pt as 1wrcin ro Me owvr"nal woting cc, W�Aq of oin! tqmj y,Tuvoy, IN Tr77W ,,,6 Of 5, first nart love N-wanon 30incrin'sol tj 12 zEnnn &c 0, f,,t ' `,n :oy of My !n thq y(sar ne Too-tsand an! tnvtsmvn bnA�- e T. � n�10.1 ;CA*ry T&KC in in! for the County K Kwin Mtn of cri"40"a, W"i Mj nAy cm"I"Imwd anj swon, Pwswally appear -d WON AJ"�c,i-c arl %-nnis oe tiIc Persoiis atescribed in God nan:en !ant, and Gwy a&mnw1Mqed to r,..o tbr"t tong th,:; sm.. Is unto oat nW hand and nff1xoc1 my Official Seal, tho My and your In this certificate Prot onove Wrl ttell. H. A. PITARri PW_,tio 'Ul and s<+,16 Z f�l FT W, A L to KA KAW Wo Ob "Kert a- An% to 0. Oarm, n 0 L so, , OVO 0 :Aorol to U>. v ty W Sin "-Ael n -d =v-y1na Q vM . city "ni oh, lay,nnn ; s,v: �)f -nod lyng ,at an n zweno Al vain "nty ny =VA1 us "MMICY ?qel&" am r pxw00 no oTrwna Annsulan or dei,Wiy, !w,, Y )MO PC 00d won Y j 1 Y W in 1WR , "1OVVV1:M to 0 nol!ng 1-100. ( Mai N Ven in 3"M qrO ly MwAonm! !' y n, �,ver r,". C1 la AOO p . pin S, 3 IOAwlt mco I itw,,� z,o - I All 4 QW& r 1 he WON, A SAW 1,0 of pqOjjc :411co UArcin and OW dovoted ', i'. t. inc, Monts od 'the T1-tP,WJRE A& TT WNPI 01WRED MY Omwei-I 4a:u,j, 1,1hownw, Unt th) jnMWUS QVt of jamb Albert tali r, Aa Alb"t ov oUyicod by sui.iA convoy.,.jjc(,, tae an(I t1jo Lome in hamby aocopttod In bohal fi of said ,01, thn towns, uses, non C I tions and rosp,watijmn thmoin cantainod. 111 V A70DINIX that ,,jLtion, mA r";Orvatjona 1mve boon set witn prudcrc"o nand V., I that; -jo pul,01(- 11)ii,-,k and, Pkay�'rouncl S;Tstcjtn ol� City to ;a ran! pjaa�rty be rhmaced wItli-In Q .,,tronod by tha Pftrl< {.`IO;,,ijr.Jsn,,()n tacroaf. Bi�� VIai- decd, bo Col,th— "Jzu july rw"rded tcncthcwith a cwq- or this resmajon Ady cori-Ified 1--y tho (Lor% Of ,,Alld Bj 1T .t. ,:;I. t',nat said CAQ Ommall dam with 1AGhtnolls tuid In'_-c— � f5lslninss, the Fcnoronity or On pnopin of San Rat'nel acknmvWd9C the Civic Pride, Ue u no- -j ., and affentinn of Ur. Namb Albert NUCh IM70 prompted Inis Lt!t us VIV AITN in WI ;Cnerov'Lty, J,ct us Rcknow1eqge oux peoru.ef-- forttxe Irn !,ho ro,,.olpt nrDTQd , �Ivnljnnal center, iip "I opsponk of W pnto of our 107 ''Wr m&vrW,7 I -a, m flm Lly rnw3l— WA t Hill anfl, all v;`K-,� spiania gift way vem no to hanop, Q: W. InVA, aws of 010 City of Wn Wall 1M2 OY cortify out low 'to sow,, rrvArti-n imn VuLy :nd m>I"rtr QW0d at J. --nc o", "Wo �O 'Own LQ V� by the AULVOng V�;Loj ",Yus- -,Ocs: Wouncilmon: YN^�_ My Clork, 11W2 fol� r(,'C(-rd CL "'. r,'Ll-`.9i, C i 1("'37 at !"oll"'I'l -, y - Dear Elected Officials, I am sending the information below, after having sent a letter initially, when I first heard about the plans for Albert Park presented by Centerfield. I am a long-term San Rafael resident and a homeowner at Picnic Hill Condos. I also have been a long-term County employee and have a business in San Rafael. I raised my two children in San Rafael and would like to continue living where I am, in peace and quiet, the few hours and days we currently have it. I am a good citizen who votes for those who represent the interests of the community and it's citizens. In my opinion, the extreme disruption proposed to use Albert Park in the way it is being considered is of grave concern to me. I can not imagine being able to live in the same home with all the noise and traffic; and the loss in value to my home will be profound. I love watching baseball! But my objection to using Albert Park for professional baseball is endeavoring to keep our community park for community activities. I am concerned about local groups who will not be able to use the field as they had. Do be assured, that any elected official who does not address these issues, and pushes this project through, will not only Not get my vote, but I shall be vocal about it. Several hundred citizens of San Rafael from four different neighborhoods surrounding Albert Field have joined together to form Citizens for Albert Park (CAP). Please keep in mind that only one of those groups is the Southern Heights Neighborhood Association representing 300 households and approximately 900 citizens who are unanimously opposed. The points of concern raised about bringing professional baseball to Albert Field are based on hundreds of hours of research done by dozens of citizens. Noise: • the stands are rarely full and • of • time the sound • is not used, thank iii• Even with the reduced attendance of 800 the surrounding neighborhoods will i• •i impacted. The amplified music will i• •! off at 9pm. However, there will be still be the loud speaker announcing games and the roar of the crowds, going on late into the night. This is extremely disruptive to people of all ages, especially those who must study, have quiet and go to sleep early to get up early for work. Please try to imagine living right next to this, the sound amplifies in this area. It is difficult enough with the sound levels now! Concession Stands: Mike Shapiro of Centerfield has stated that the concessions stands is one way for them to make money and that they will not be using any local restaurants. One rationale for bringing in professional baseball was to benefit the downtown merchants. This will not be the case now. Frequency: 45 games a season, averaging 3 times a week that the ball field will be used for private commercial, instead of public recreational, use. This is high impact use. Alcohol: This is of concern to many. To compare alcohol consumption at the Bocce courts where the average age is older adult, is far from equivalent to anyone over 21 drinking at a baseball game. Centerfield said they would provide private security to ensure the neighborhood is kept safe. Having security persons roaming around does not make me feel safer, it is weird and uncomfortable and very much changes the feeling of the area. Safety: Professionally hit balls are very likely to leave the ball park unless fences are raised significantly. Already, balls are leaving the field now, landing up in Parkside School and the apartment building across the street. Liability: If the City as the landlord of Centerfield would be liable for any injuries as a result from balls causing damage to persons or property, then Centerfield should be required to pay a significant bond, to cover for this eventuality. If Centerfield fails, as has been the case with many minor league teams in recent years, we do not want the City of San Rafael, e.g. us the taxpayers, left paying the bills. Ticket Prices and Long Term Ramifications: At the very first meeting, Brian Clark of Centerfield said they would need an attendance of 1500 to break even. With the new plan at 800 attendees, this now means they will have to increase the ticket price. Now it is no longer the "cheap family outing" that they originally touted. Plus, how can this new scaled down plan be economically viable for them? I agree with "CAP" who urges the City to go through the CEQUA process to study the long term effects of this proposal. Real Estate Values: If Centerfield is here to stay and grow their business, their success means more negative impact for surrounding residents. The character of our neighborhood changes and becomes more urban. What does that do to the desirability of living here and property values? I spoke to two young people who spoke at the first public meeting who live in Sausalito and were hired by CP to talk why they want baseball in SR. Please listen to the people who live here. Imagine, please, that the disturbance of our quiet neighborhood with this project will be paramount to those of us who live here. Do the study. Protect those of us who love baseball, but who want to live in peaceful surroundings. Suzanne D. Alfandari, MS, MFT Page I of 2 Esther Beirne From: Patti Brennan on behalf of City Manager Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 2:20 PM To: Dana Melnichek; Esther Beirne; Nancy Mackle Subject: FW: Centerfield From: Mary Valente Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 11:39 AM To: City Manager Subject: Centerfield Hello - and thank you, respectfully, for taking time to read my letter. I have been following the proposal of a new Minor League team in Gerstle Park since I first learned of it, which due to poor communication with the adjacent neighborhoods, was well after much of the city's consideration process had been done. While not opposed to local San Rafael baseball activity in our neighborhood baseball park, we am very opposed to this outside venture Centerfield's proposal for a minor league team in this particular location. While my husband and I support the local teams that play at the park, we are not at all interested in it becoming a field for higher level baseball for these reasons: 1. Reports/Honest Disclosure: At the beginning we were told the city had unilaterally decided there was no need for environmental impact reports (formal or otherwise). Eventually, in response to very unhappy local citizens, it was decided that some noise and traffic studies would be done ... and the results given to us. Citizens voiced that the city should not pay with our tax dollars for these reports, but rather Centerfield should pay - not unlike any other private business or home buyer who must pay for their own inspections, environmental reports etc. Evidently Centerfield looked at the cost and decided not to do the studies but rather reduce the size of the seating. Yet, what's to say, once they are using the field, that they will petition for adding more seats and get what they want without ever doing the appropriate studies. 2. The noise. The league will likely draw attendees from all over Marin County - thus the stadium, even at its current size, will be fuller - and noisier. The loud speaker and even the noise from the crowd will travel up and hit again the bowl shape of our area - amplifying the sound as it travels up and out. 45 games: approx. 3`week - a big increase in noise in our area. Also, for Wildcare - how can wild sick animals cope with the increase noise that will come from the park? 3. Parking & traffic. Attendees will likely come from work - often one person per car. Parking will increase in the neighborhoods. Congestion near our middle and elementary schools will increase. Potential for children injured increases. Noise from parking and people returning to their cars, esp. from night games, will increase. 9/13/2011 Page 2 of 2 3. Property Values: When I moved here there was a revitalization going on. The city was finally cracking down on illegal units. Our neighborhood has many old lovely homes. Families enjoy the area, the proximity to school, the diversity. However, to provide affordable housing the city made a policy turn and gave amnesty to illegal units in what should be single family residences. This was bad for our property values. We also have to contend with the soup kitchen and an adult video store being in walking distance of our homes. This minor league endeavor will be an additional pox on our neighborhood - a negative affec to what should a more local, family -use field, 4. Alcohol. If people become inebriated at the game, they will spill over into on our local neighborhood after the game. The area will be noisier; there will be a greater likelihood of fights, urination in the bushes around the park etc. The whole feel of our neighborhood will change. I'll bet none of the local politicians that have supported this minor league proposal live in the adjacent neighborhood. So why should they care? An increase in security guards doesn't make the neighborhood nicer - rather more slum -like. 5. Financial considerations: Liability costs: who will pay for the law suits the city will have to defend should their be injuries inside or outside the ball park. The park, under Centerfield, will sell food and drink in the concession stands. This does not lend itself to promoting more business for local restaurants and pubs. The city will not be making enough money from whatever Centerfield has agreed to pay to cover real and potential costs of this endeavor. 6. Safety: From the beginning I've asked about how the children and staff at Parkside will be impacted by stronger players hitting harder, faster balls. The school already gets balls coming onto it's property. Again, this is the WRONG place for minor league team. Thank you again, for 'listening' to one of Gerstle Parks homeowners. Please consider all these ramifications and how you would feel if this was down the street from where you live. Mary Valente 9/13/2011 Page I of 2 Esther Beirne From: Patti Brennan onbehalf ofCity Manager Sem*: Tuesday, September 13.2O112:21PM To: Esther Berne;Nancy Mackie Subject: FW: Semi -Professional Baseball inAlbert Park From: Cindi Hubbard IL _ Sent:', September13,2O11 11:44 AM To: AJBoro; Greg Brockbank;Marc Levine; Barbara Heller; City Manage Cc: Subject: Semi -Professional Baseball inAlbert Park Dear Honorable Mayor 8muCity Council Members and Staff, I had the opportunity to speak with Council Member Greg Brockbank at the recent Gerstle Park Neighborhood Association Annual Picnic about the proposal from Centerfield to develop Albert Park for semi-professional baseball games. As a homeowner, I have serious concerns about the impact of such a proposal onthe quality oflife and onproperty values innnyneighborhood. While lannnot opposed to. baseball osasportand a�endgamnesonoccasion inSan Francisco, Iarnnot infavor of"just trying it' as suggested by Mr. Brockbank without appropriate due diligence including completion of an appropriate Financial Impact Analysis and CEQAevaluation. As elected officials I believe the Mayor and City Council have a responsibility to address the concerns being put forth bvhonoeownensand residents and, inthis case, especia|hthose ofuyvvhoreside inthe neighborhood of' erst|u Park. The Council needs to show how the City, and Gerste Park in particular, will benefit bvdisplacing those non-professional connnnunityorganizations that curnanthuse the baUparkona regular basis -- siy and, importantly, from the Centedie|d proposal - financially, environmentally, and h currentMarket/ThursdayRa Pa�ya|nsady otherwise. AsI explained to Mr. Brockbank, the negabvek/irnpa�smyneighborhood onnweeWybasis vvithincreased tra05c,noise and disturbances that generally 'dunot occur other nights ofthe week. Idonot call the police for every incident ofdrunken behavior, yelling of obscenities and other acts that happen on Thursdays, as I consider once a week tolerable. What is intolerable is the potential for similar situations four nights a week for five months out ofthe year. While I appreciate their attempt ata scaled back version of the plan, in some instances, Centerfie|d has missed the point This proposal is being put forth as a benefit to the community and local businesses, yet to my knowledge there has been no comparative benefit analysis to show the positive or negative impact of semi-professional ballparks in other similar cities. (Baltimore is nota similar city!)This proposal includes no local businesses as food or beverage vendors, and while plans to offer free parking are helpful, having worked in the enhe�ainnnentindustry for more than 20 years, I know firsthand an audience's desire to be the flrst out of the area once the last ball is hit. I fully anticipate people will seek freeparkingnot in the lots where they must contend with other drivers, but in my neighborhood where parking and traffic are already becoming a challenge. AsIexplained toMr. Brockbank, Ihave lived in Gerstle Park now for seven years and highly value the 9/13/2011 Page 2 of 2 peaceful and quiet nature of the neighborhood I moved into. What I have experienced most recently are events and situations that lead more and more to an increased urban and disassociated environment, including more unrestricted, unlicensed sober living facilities with boarding house lodging situations and inappropriate safety precautions; an arrest for selling meth in front of Short Elementary School; homeless living in and littering Gerstle Park; an attempt to entice a child at Gerstle Park; gang activity including a car chase through the neighborhood and fatal stabbing; people openly smoking pot; increased traffic with more vehicles speeding through the neighborhood to the point where my elderly neighbor can't cross the street. I share all of this so you will understand why I cannot support the Centerfield proposal or agree to "just to try it" without appropriate research and consideration given to the financial, environmental and quality of life impacts for the residents of Gerstle Park. While the question of semi-professional ballgames seems innocuous on the surface, I do not believe Centerfield, a non -local business with no previous experience managing a ballpark has the City of San Rafael's interests at the forefront of their thinking. I am asking that the City Council share with the neighbors of Gerstle Park the specific benefits to us and to the City of San Rafael based on factual impact studies, comparative analysis and solid research before moving forward. I appreciate your time and consideration. Yours sincerely, Cindi Hubbard, Homeowner San Rafael, CA 94901 91` 13/2011 Bel Albert Holdings LLC C/O Eaton Vance Mgmt Real Estate Investment Group Two International Place, 8th Floor Boston, MA 02110 September 13, 2011 Via Electronic Delivery City of San Rafael 1400 Fifth Avenue San Rafael, CA 94901-1943 Re: Concerns regarding proposed location of professional baseball team park in San Rafael To Whom it May Concern: I represent the ownership of the Lofts at Albert Park Apartments ("The Lofts"), 155 Anderson Drive, San Rafael, CA 94901 which consists of 125 luxury rental apartments located across the street from Albert Field. I am writing to you today to respectfully request that the City Council and Mayor's office complete a comprehensive review of the Centerfield Partners LLC proposal and engage a third party to complete a study regarding the potential negative impacts of approving the current proposal to establish a professional baseball team playing at Albert Fields. Based on the information that we have been able to obtain there appears to be a number of significant issues that I feel could negatively impact the residents living at The Lofts and therefore cause operational challenges as a result of the proposed use of Albert Park by a professional baseball team/league. These impacts if not appropriately addressed could directly lead to resident dissatisfaction, increased turnover, and higher vacancy and ultimately decrease the value of our significant investment within the community of San Rafael (which would potentially reduce associated property taxes as well). A few of these potential issues are increases in traffic/congestion, noise/light pollution, crime (loitering), safety concerns & increase of liability and property damage from errant baseballs. Based on the current configuration of Anderson Drive our property only has one vehicular access point (a right hand turn) which with the increased traffic of patrons, vendors and employees of the ball field would cause great disruption to residents attempting to return to their homes during peak baseball operational times. Also, new prospective residents likely would not want to deal with the congestion and potential associated delays as well as other negative affects and decide to look elsewhere to lease (including outside of San Rafael). The close proximity of the field to residential uses and the current existing small land parcel to work with doesn't appear to allow for appropriate modifications to the existing layout or give many options to mitigate these concerns. I have learned from past experiences that converting an existing facility within an infill location typically doesn't allow for the appropriate design requirements and adequate buffers to address these types of concerns. The majority of stadium venues are constructed on very large parcels with abundant parking fields, excess land and adequate transportation access determined by third party traffic studies. Additionally it is very rare to have residential uses within such a short proximity from these types of facilities. September 13, 2011 Page 2 As one of the few high end luxury apartments within the City limits I believe it is in the best interest of the City Council and Mayor's office to ensure the continued quite enjoyment for residents at the Lofts by taking all needed steps to understand potential issues and mitigate those issues appropriately. Based on the information currently available and the apparent lack of vetting these types of concerns I do not believe approving the current proposal is in the best interest of the community and its tax payers and ultimately will cause provable economic harm to our investment. Very Truly Yours, Michael Alexander, Vice President Authorized Signatory cc: Mayor, Mr. Albert J. Boro Vice Mayor, Mr. Greg Brockbank Council Members: Mr. Damon Connolly Ms. Barbara Heller Mr. Marc Levine City Manager, Ms. Nancy Mackle Director of Community Services, Ms. Carlene McCart City Attorney, Mr. Robert Epstein Internal Council for EVM, Jennifer Madden Community Manager, Archstone, Andrew Bartlett Operations Manager, Archstone, Todd Marler Communities for Albert Park, Michael Soldavini Page 1 of 1 Al Boro From: Sent: To: Cc: Joel Schwartz/Nancy Hine [r Tuesday, September 13, 2011 10:23 AM opinion@marinij.com Al Boro; Damon Connolly; Marc Levine; Barbara Heller; Greg Brockbank; _ . .. L ------- -n4, Subject: Pro Baseball at Albert Park I just read Adina Beaumont's letter to the Marin Voice, Tuesday, 9/13/2011, regarding more pro baseball at Albert Park. I would like to add one more item that I think is at the root of this scam to bring professional baseball here. I feel that it is a subject too delicate to address, however, I feel as though I am walking on egg shells in mentioning it. I think there is something VERY FISHY going on here. Why does Centerfield Partners appear to be in bed with the city council of San Rafael in their attempt to impose pro baseball here? I think there is absolutely no push back against this proposal what so ever from them. It's all on our shoulders. There are so many things wrong with this proposal, namely, a huge step in procedure that is missing both ethically and legally. I wish we had Perry Mason on our side to help expose this. Joel Schwartz, San Rafael, Ca. 94901, 9/14/2011 M=. From: City Council Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:36 AM To: Al Boro Subject: FW: Formsite email to Mayor Albert J. Boro 6291547 ------------------------------------------- From: form—engine(cDfsl8.formsite.com[SMTP:FORM—ENGINE@FS18.FORMSITE.COM] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:36:10 AM To: City Council Subject: Formsite email to Mayor Albert J. Boro 6291547 Auto forwarded by a Rule Council Contact Form City IdIft ty of ban Rafael City Council Contact Form Page I of 2 Thank you for visiting the City of San Rafael website. This form is available to facilitate contacting our Mayor and Councilmembers concerning topics of interest to the community. Please contact the City Manager's office at 415-485-3070 for any additional assistance. * First Name Michael * Last Name Douglas Address 1 Address 2 City Novato State CA Zip Code 93934 Phone Number 9/14/2011 Page 2 of 2 N * Email Address * Send email to (select one) Mayor Albert I8om * Please enter your questions/comments below I want to urge you to vote in favor of the proposal being presented to the City Council by Centedie|d Partners. A minor league team in San Rafael would not only bring more visitors to the businesses in town, it would also be a positive move for the youth baseball programs in Marin county. The ballplayers would be interacting with leagues and teams by the way of clinics and would present a positive role model influence tothe young ball players inMarin County. 9114112011 Page I of I Al Boro From: Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 2:08 PM To: Al Boro; Greg Brockbank; Marc Levine; Barbara Heller Cc: Subject: Time Sensitive Issues re Professional Baseball in Albert Park, San Rafael am very concerned about the possibility of professional baseball coming to our little neighborhood Albert Park. This park was a gift to the City of San Rafael specifically designated to be used by the community, not to be used as a money -making venture for a developer! So far in the community meetings that have occurred, Centerfield Partners, the developer, has made vague and unfounded promises of all kinds, including that they would pay for an initial study and that they would make all sorts of improvements to the park. Now Centerfield no longer agrees even to pay for an initial study! So, Mr. Mayor, why are you and the City Council wasting your time and ours to consider Centerfield's proposal any longer? Also of concern - why did Carlene McCart of the Parks & Recreation Dept. create a very lengthy report on Albert Park for Centerfield Partners? She defended Centerfield as if she were one of them and not a neutral City employee! In effect, our tax money supported the work of a City employee preparing a lengthy case in favor of a developer! I know that I am one among many property owners concerned about the value of my home going down if the noise, traffic congestion and neighborhood safety are jeopardized as a result of having professional baseball in Albert Park. PLEASE reconsider this proposal. If you believe in the democratic process at all, why not put a significant issue such as the current baseball project on a ballot for the citizens to decide? Sincerely, Johanna Petersen, Resident San Rafael, CA 94901 9/14/2011 Page 1 of 1 Al Boro From: Joel Schwartz/Nancy Hine Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 9:24 AM To: Al Boro; Damon Connolly; Greg Brockbank; Barbara Heller; Marc Levine; Carlene McCart; Rob Epstein Cc: info@communitiesforalbertpark.org; Pam Feagles Subject: Albert Park Pro Baseball In an e-mail of Sept 9, 2011, from Pam Feagles to the above, I support it's content completely. The theme, opposing the proposal to bring professional baseball to and commercialize an agreement with a developer, Centerfield Properties, to Albert Park. Not only have you abused and lost our trust, and since our last meeting where you acknowledged that abuse, you've done it once again in an apparent attempt to let Centerfield offer another approach to a back -door proposal by offering a one year program and reneging on their plan to conduct an EIR, at their expense and put off for another year, the time it would take to conduct the EIR and await it's results. Then to review it once again. I take this entire situation as such horrible insult to, not only mine, but the entire community apposed to the project, our intelligence! You must collectively think we're so stupid as to believe that you can conduct yourselves in this manor and not have us react to you as we have. This is totally unacceptable behavior both professionally and as adults. You must end this endeavor immediately and move on. Respectfully, a concerned citizen and registered voter. Joel Schwartz, San Rafael, Ca 94901, 9114%2011 Page 1 of 1 Al Boro From: Anne Sheldo ---. --- Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 9:42 PM To: Al Bora; Barbara Heller; Marc Levine; Greg Brockbank; Damon Connolly Subject: Albert Park modified plan Importance: High Dear Mayor Boro, Ms. Heller, Mr. Levine, Mr. Brockbank, and Mr. Connolly, We understand that Centerfield Partners are still trying to push their proposal for baseball at Albert Park through and have come up with a new plan from the original one. It seems to us that they are doing everything they possibly can to avoid having to do the right thing by the surrounding neighborhoods and pay for an Initial Study or EIR. The modified plan that CP proposes still does not fully address the core issues which remain huge potential problems for San Rafael. Traffic will still be a nightmare and the offer of free parking does not take into account the certainty that fans will drive over Wolfe Grade and use neighborhood streets to park to be close to the stadium (the entrance to the stadium is not on the Anderson Drive side but on the '13' street side). Not having awful loud pop music etc. play after Spm will not mean that much as we will still have to listen to the racket up until that time and our summers will still be ruined by the noise. And the fact that Centerfield will now not put any higher fences up is simply asking for more trouble as far as safety is concerned. Surely that is a huge red flag. Another point that makes zero sense is that CP claim that the fans will bring business to downtown by eating in the restaurants there, yet they will be serving drinks and junk food to the fans themselves (whether outside or inside the stadium makes no difference). It is blatantly obvious that the only people who will benefit from this project are Centerfield Partners. They are the only ones who will make some money out of it (although the whole thing is so incredibly speculative that nobody really knows whether it will be a success for not). In short, the plan is extremely ill-advised and it does not make any sense whatsoever that it is even being considered. We urge you to please consider how this plan — modified or not — will affect the neighborhoods surrounding Albert Park and how you would feel yourselves if you were living close enough to have your own summers spoiled. Sincerely, The Filby Family Annie, Alan, and Claire 9/14/2011 Page I of 2 Al Boro From: Pam Feagles Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 12:24 PM To: Al Boro; Damon Connolly; Greg Brockbank; Barbara Heller; Marc Levine; Carlene McCart; Rob Epstein Cc: Communities for Albert Park Subject: Albert Park Pro Baseball Honorable Mayor, City Council Members and City Staff, In fallowup to the Community Meeting of 8/9/2011, it is to be recalled that meeting opened with an announcement by Mayor Boro, and Brian Clark of Centerfield that Centerfield would underwrite a "discretionary" study under the California Environmental Quality Act prior to seeking approval of an agreement or contract with the City for the proposed use of Albert Park. There followed at least one half hour of questions posed to the City Attorney concerning this process, and a promise that the Planning Director, Paul Jensen, would be present at the next meeting to explain CEQA to community members. It was further promised that the agenda item originally scheduled 8/15/11, would be no more than a vote to proceed with the CEQA study. All other issues and questions posed from that point on were addressed or deferred with the understanding a CEQA evaluation would be undertaken prior to any further consideration of the proposal. Mayor Boro commented several times during the meeting that he appreciated a "total lack of trust" on the part of the community toward the developers and some of the City representatives. Nonetheless, community members left that meeting with the understanding of a good faith agreement going forwards. Bait and Switch Hitting As you know, Centerfield subsequently formulated a revised proposal which says nothing at all about their promise of funding a CEQA study. Is the whole scheme back at square one? Would someone kindly clarify whether the CEQA study is still on the table? The Marin Independent Journal, which roundly endorsed the original plan, has published conflicting reports. An editorial of 9/5/11, concerning another development, mentions this project incidentally, saying the City intends to conduct a study of environmental issues. However, an earlier news report of the scaled-down plan quotes Mike Shapiro as saying the developer decided to renege on the study because it costs too much and would delay the first season for a year. Keep in mind these same businessmen have proposed an $8 million stadium in Dublin. The costs and delays were known and discussed extensively during the community meeting of 8/9/11, and yet Mr. Clark and Mr. Shapiro happily let everyone go home thinking they were committed to undertake and underwrite the study. This is not good faith negotiation! No wonder Mayor Boro, saw a "total lack of trust" from the community. If this is how these guys do business at the front end, what do you think the community and the City can expect going forwards? It is inconceivable any City representatives would favor further discussions with this group. Apparently the developer has decided unilaterally that scaling back the project will mollify the neighborhood's interest in an environmental review. It does not. It does demonstrate to the neighbors 9/14/2011 Page 2 of 2 and, hopefully to the City's negotiators, that we should anticipate the entire process, should it go forwards, will be fraught with underhanded tactics on the part of the developer. Finances Mayor Boro and Councilman Connolly were to comprise a subcommittee to study financial aspects of this project, particularly the City's costs. Has that study been completed and, if so, is a report available? Will there be any modifications based on the developer's revised proposal? Does it include specifics of the payment for City police directing traffic on overtime paid by the developer? Will those officers be on the City payroll while performing these functions? If so, does that time count toward pension and retirement health care, vacation and sick leave accrual? If so, is the developer paying toward those costs as well as the hourly overtime? How about workers' compensation for the traffic officers and the maintenance worker? Is the developer paying anything for that? As you all know, a relatively modest injury, especially to a police officer, could consume within a few weeks the equivalent of a year's gross permit fees. Revised 'Agreement" (contract vs. Proposal Is it correct that the City Council will not vote on anything further until the latest proposal is formalized in a revised Agreement, rather than the vague revisions presented so far, and that said revised Agreement will be published in time for public review and comment? Very truly yours, Pam Feagles Gerstle Park homeowner, taxpayer, registered voter 9114/2011 Page 1 of 1 Al Boro From: Joel Schwartz/Nancy Hine _ Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 10:46 AM To: Iletters@pacificsun.com Cc: Carlene McCart; Al Boro; Subject: Albert Park I've just received a copy of a terrific letter written by Brian Gannon who's an advocate against the city council of San Rafael wanting to allow ( for the good of the city) a private corporation / for profit, to completely take over use of Albert Park for a season of professional baseball. I am a resident of Gerstle Park in the immediate vicinity of this venture and am apposed to the city council allowing this to take place. I think it benefits only Centerfield Properties, the corporation wanting to enter into this deal, and no one else. Those on the business end of San Rafael have no business expertise in dealing with a program such as this and those representing Centerfield Properties are in business to make a profit and are a mufti -million dollar businesses. We, of San Rafael, are being taken advantage of and are being ripped off. I don't get it. Why is the city council so eager to go ahead with this deal knowing that so many of us are apposed to it. Joel Schwartz, San Rafael, Ca 9/14/2011