HomeMy WebLinkAboutPW Class II Bike LanesAgenda Item No: 5.a
Meeting Date: August 18, 2014
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: Public Works
Prepared by: _ City Manager Approval: ' 2
Director of Public Works
File No.: 16.06.79
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND UPHOLDING STAFF'S DECISION TO
INSTALL A CLASS H BIDE LANE ON POINT SAN PEDRO ROAD WITHIN THE CITY'S
JURISDICTION
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution upholding staff's decision to install Class II bike lanes as
shown in Exhibit C.
BACKGROUND: At the July 21, 2014 City Council meeting, the City Council heard public testimony
from more than 20 people during open time regarding the installation of a Class II bike lane along Point
San Pedro Road. The Council asked staff to bring this issue to the City Council meeting on August 18,
2014 to allow the Council to review staff's design decision.
Based on the comments received during the July 21St meeting, this report addresses the following topics:
1. Public notification
2. Limits of the proposed Class II bike lane
3. On -street parking fronting the Village at Loch Lomond Marina
The following documents are attached to this report:
Exhibit A - Chronology of events
Exhibit B – Class I, II, III bike lane detail
Exhibit C – Point San Pedro Road Class II and Class III bike lane
Exhibit D – August 5, 2014, Memorandum from Community Development Director Paul Jensen
Public Notification
It is important to provide background information about the Point San Pedro Road Resurfacing Project to
address the public notification issues associated with the installation of a Class II bike lane.
File No.:
P—M
FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
Council Meeting:
Disposition: ���SoLU rc
c21/�`2
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 2
Point San Pedro Road Resurfacing
The County of Marin administers Quarrying Permit #Q71-03 associated with the San Rafael
Rock Quarry. The main trucking route to the quarry is along Point San Pedro Road, which has
shown significant deterioration from heavy loads. Dutra Materials Inc. agreed to pay for a
portion of the resurfacing of Point San Pedro Road as part of the mitigation measures associated
with the quarry. Marin County Public Works took the lead in developing the design and
managing the resurfacing of the roadway. Dutra donated 900 tons of Asphalt Concrete (AC) to
the project. Based on a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between San Rafael and the
County, the City contributed $650,000 which includes $25,000 contingency, to the project with
the remaining cost supported by the County of Marin. As part of the MOU, the County designed,
bid, managed and constructed the project on behalf of the City. The Point San Pedro project was
referenced in the City's FY 12/13 and FY 13/14 Capital Improvement Program.
The County's resurfacing plan for Point San Pedro Road included a Class II bike lane for most of
the length of the roadway. All the aspects of the project, including the Class II bike lane, were
discussed at a public meeting hosted by the County on May 21, 2013. During the design phase of
the project, the City and the County discussed the extent of this bike lane, especially since it
would travel in and out of City and County jurisdictions.
Based on this review and feedback, the County of Marin designed and bid the project in March,
2014 and awarded the resurfacing contract to MCK Construction in the amount of $1,206,628.
On April 7, 2014, the County of Marin held another public meeting to discuss the installation of
the Class II bike lane. Approximately 40 people attended along with City staff. The County also
solicited opinions from residents along the County section of the roadway. As a result, further
modifications were made to the limits of the Class II bike lane within the County's jurisdiction.
MCK started the project on May 16, 2014, and completed the actual resurfacing on July 14, 2014.
Final striping began on July 28, 2014. The County has decided to proceed with striping the Class
II/III bike lanes within their jurisdiction. Final striping within the City section is on hold as the
Council deliberates this issue.
Additional Communication and Outreach
Since 2010, Public Works staff has worked very closely with neighborhood associations,
coalitions and individual residents on Point San Pedro Road in relation to the Median
Landscaping project, resurfacing, and private development projects. Very early in the Median
Landscaping Project, we learned about the challenges associated with uniform and cohesive
communication with all residents and homeowner's associations; there are more than 18 HOA's
which have access to Point San Pedro Road. Opinions and suggestions were diverse. The Point
San Pedro Road Coalition offered to serve as single point of contact to represent the residents and
neighborhood associations. This partnership was extremely effective and resulted in a successful
project in terms of time and budget. Public Works staff continued this partnership and
communication for all projects and matters of interest to Point San Pedro residents. Ongoing
communication with the Point San Pedro Road Coalition has been a highly effective way to
exchange information on a regular basis, on a variety of projects. Some examples:
• Point San Pedro Road Median Landscaping Assessment District formation and annual
reports
• Point San Pedro Road Median Landscaping Project design, architect selection, scope of
work, public meetings and input on project design, and construction feedback
• Post median landscaping project modifications
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 3
0 Point San Pedro Road Median Landscaping maintenance scope of work
• The Village at Loch Lomond Marina
• #2000 Point San Pedro Road single family housing development
• Point San Pedro Road resurfacing project, parking restriction and bicycle facilities
• Outreach and annual meetings
• Third Street Congestion and Parking study between Embarcadero and Hetherton Street
Based on these interactions with the Point San Pedro Road Coalition, City and County staff
communicated their intent to install a Class II bike lane on Point San Pedro Road. On February
13, 2014, via an e-mail, the City and County received favorable comments from the Point San
Pedro Road Coalition.
On July 21, 2014 the City Council did hear from some residents in favor of the Class II bike lane
on this road; however the majority of the comments were not in favor of the Class II bike lane
which is contradictory to the support received from the Point San Pedro Road Coalition.
Limits of the proposed Class H bike lane
Several speakers at the July 21, 2014 Council meeting expressed concerns that the Class II bike lane
would be excessive and that it should be discussed further. A Class II bike lane, which is a dedicated bike
lane, will also limit on -street parking. Some residents stated that the reduction of on -street parking in
front of their houses would negatively impact the use of their property.
Class II and Class III Bike Lane (Exhibit B)
There are three types of standard bike lanes utilized in municipal construction. A Class I bike
lane is a bike path that is separated from the roadway by a minimum of a 4 foot buffer. A Class II
bike lane is a dedicated bike lane, which is a minimum of 4 feet wide and is contiguous with the
roadway. A Class III bike lane shares the road with vehicles. See Exhibit B for a schematic
detail of each of these bike lanes.
San Rafael General Plan 2020 & San Rafael Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan
San Rafael General Plan 2020, adopted on November 15, 2004, and updated in 2011, identifies
key policies associated with the installation of bike lanes within the City. Many of the items
identified in the plan are directly linked to the installation of bike lanes. For instance, the
installation of the bike lane encourages cycling and reduces vehicular traffic, which is part of
Goal 16 ("Bikeways"). Reducing the number of vehicles on the roadway is also part of Goal 33
("Clean Air and Waterways"). Installation of pathways also achieves Goal 13 ("Mobility for All
Users") and further encourages alternative modes of transportation and healthier communities,
whether the bike lane is used for recreational purposes or commuting. Many of the public
speakers who addressed the City Council on July 21, 2014 noted these benefits.
Per Goal 16 of San Rafael General Plan 2020, the San Rafael Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan was
adopted by the City Council in 2002 and updated in 2011. Table 2-2 of the Bicycle/Pedestrian
Master Plan in Chapter 2 states that all of the following actions are to be carried out at a staff
level:
1. Where feasible, include planning and design of bicycle and pedestrian facilities as an
integral part of the process for all transportation improvements.
2. Seek funding for bicycle projects through regional, state and federal funding
programs.
3. Coordinate with multi jurisdictional planning and funding applications, and system
integration when appropriate.
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Paye: 4
Table 5-2 of the Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan identifies Point San Pedro Road as a Class II
bike lane. The City of San Rafael utilizes a multi -modal approach to all projects. While a simple
drainage project may only require the replacement of a drainage culvert, our engineers also assess
all modes of travel within a project area. We will upgrade existing curb ramps and other
infrastructure to address as many issues as possible while construction crews are on site. For
Point San Pedro Road, curb ramp improvements and the installation of other improvements fully
complied with the City's Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan.
As this project developed, staff saw an opportunity where feasible to improve the existing bicycle
system by installing a Class II bike lane. The City also required the installation of updated curb
ramps to improve pedestrian access. The goals in the General Plan and the Bicycle/Master Plan
state clearly that this determination is to be carried out at a staff level.
Proposed Class HBike Lane Limits (Exhibit Q
During the initial public meetings held by the County in March 2013, and on April 2014,
residents noted that they were concerned about restricting parking along several areas of Point
San Pedro Road. The area fronting the field area next to Point San Pedro School, which is
utilized heavily by parents picking up and dropping off students, was mentioned as one such area.
City staff has also observed this parking condition in front of the school, and proposes to have
this area remain a Class III bike lane on the south side of the road from the school entrance to the
San Pedro Cove entrance.
Several properties on the east -bound section of Point San Pedro Road from Bayview to Main
Drive, which are in the County jurisdiction, lack sufficient off-street parking. Based on earlier
comments from the Point San Pedro Road Coalition and residents at the public meetings in March
2013 and April 2014, the County has installed a Class III bike lane (shared bike lane) in this area.
In addition, the area in front of San Rafael High School from Union to Mooring, fronted by a
number of businesses and establishments, relies heavily on on -street parking for their customers.
This area is proposed to remain a Class III bike lane, shared by cyclists and motorists.
On August 6, 2014, City Public Works staff met with the Principal of San Pedro Elementary
School to discuss the removal of on -street parking for installation of Class II bike lanes on Point
San Pedro Road. In general, the Principal feels that there is a high demand for on -street parking
and that it should remain on both sides of Point San Pedro Road between Lochinvar Road and
Bay Way. The Principal is concerned that the 540 students and 50-60 staff members that attend
the school daily will have no choice but to park within the Loch Lomond neighborhood during
drop off and pick up times. She also mentioned that the school district plans to increase
enrollment to 690 students within a two year period. The majority of students who attend San
Pedro Elementary School live outside the area and utilize bus service or are driven to the school.
In addition to daily parking, the Principal is concerned about impacts caused by special events
such as back to school night, little league, etc. where the demand for parking is even higher.
Over the past several years, the Public Works Department has been monitoring the area in front
of San Pedro School and has not noticed a demand for parking in front of the school that would
N\ arrant removal of the bike lane on the north side of the road or expansion of the current limits
shown on Exhibit C. During special events, the Department of Public Works will work with the
school to provide temporary on -street parking on Point San Pedro Road to minimize parking
impacts to the adjacent Loch Lomond Neighborhood.
On -Street Parkin6 fronting the Village at Loch Lomond Marina
Several members of the public have asserted that installing the Class II bike lane in front of the Village at
Loch Lomond contradicts the original conditions of project approval. They expressed concerns that there
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 5
will be insufficient parking on the Village at Loch Lomond site, resulting in the need to retain or
supplement parking for the site by providing additional parking on Point San Pedro Road or even in
adjacent communities.
The Village at Loch Lomond — Conditions of Approval
Exhibit D, a memo from Community Development Director Paul Jensen, provides additional
history and background on the parking issues that were addressed prior to the ultimate City
approval of the Village at Loch Lomond project (Village). The memo addresses the history of the
Village development, the parking studies prepared for the project, and the parking requirements
imposed in the August 6, 2007 approval of the project by City Council Resolution No. 12332. Of
relevance and importance is Environmental and Design Review Permit (ED04-063) Finding 5f in
Resolution 12332, which states:
The project as revised has been designed to provide adequate onsite parking by either
meeting the minimum City -adopted municipal code requirements for parking or
providing adequate parking to meet peak use period demands. As conditioned, the
parking for the marina and recreation use areas, which is based on peak use period
demand would be monitored and contingency measures are in place (parking reserve) in
the event additional parking is warranted.
Further, Master Use Permit (UP04-007) Condition 7a in Resolution 12332 confirms the following
marina use parking for the Village project, which was focus of the parking studies:
A total of 259 vehicle parking spaces and 27 vehicle + trailer parking spaces (35 spaces
proposed) are required as presented on the approved development plan. The parking
plan also includes an approved `parking reserve' (landscaping that can be converted to
parking and a `landscape reserve' (parking that can be converted to landscaping) for
future use.
This Design Review Permit finding and Use Permit condition confirm that there is sufficient
parking on site, with the option of additional reserve parking if needed. Please note that the
parking demand study that was prepared for the Village project was commissioned to determine
adequate parking need for the marina and supportive/ancillary marina uses. The residential and
neighborhood commercial (grocery store) components of the Village project comply with the City
parking code requirements. As explained in Exhibit D, overflow parking onto City streets was
not factored into the parking study completed for the Village development, thus the study's
conclusions and recommendations did not rely upon the extent of available on -street parking
along Point San Pedro Road.
The conditions alleged to be violated by the decision to implement the Class II bike lane are
conditions of the Master Use Permit for the project. Master Use Permit Condition 7f requires the
preparation of an updated parking study two years after completion and occupancy of the project.
Condition 7f contains remedial actions to be taken to increase or decrease the on-site parking
depending upon the results of the study, including the conversion of the required landscape
reserve to parking on site.
In addition, Master Use Permit (liPO4-007) Condition 7g requires a study of on -street parking use
along the Point San Pedro Road property frontage:
The updated parking study required in 7f above shall also assess the extent of on -street
parking use along the Point San Pedro Road property frontage with the current Class III
bicycle route (route shared with vehicle travel lane and parking lane). In the event the
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 6
updated parking study determines that the on -street parking demand is low, the City may
proceed with implementing a Class H bicycle lane along the property frontage.
It is important to note the clarification in Mr. Jensen's memo (Exhibit D) that Condition 7g is applicable
to the Point San Pedro Road frontage of the Village at Loch Lomond prope only, not any other portion
of Point San Pedro Road. The conditions of approval cannot and do not place requirements on the
developer to modify or study other frontages adjacent to the development. There have been no changes to
the Village project since the City approvals in August 2007. The scope and type of land uses that were
approved have not changed. The project approvals for the Village have been vested and the City has no
discretion to revise or add conditions or requirements to this development, except those requirements set
forth in Resolution 12332.
The City Attorney has reviewed Resolution No. 12332 and has determined that its conditions will not be
violated if the City proceeds at this time to install a Class II bike lane on the Point San Pedro Road
frontage of the Village at Loch Lomond Marina. The bike lane will not prevent or void the condition for
preparation of an updated parking study by the project developer, nor will it prevent further action by the
City Council to return the bike lane to a Class III bike lane should the Council determine that to be
necessary. Nothing in Resolution No. 12332 was meant to, or legally does, prohibit the City from
undertaking a public project to implement the City's Bicycle Master Plan, along the project frontage or
elsewhere.
The Class II bike lane fronting the Village at Loch Lomond Marina was discussed at the City/San Rafael
Federation Coalition of Neighborhoods meeting on June 25, 2014. Based on comments received from the
residents, staff modified the design and proposed to maintain the Class III bike lane from San Pedro
School field to Main Drive. This has been referred to as a "compromise" solution to meet the intent of
the bike plan yet allaying community concerns in this area.
ANALYSIS: The resurfacing of Point San Pedro Road has given the City an opportunity to further
improve the roadway by adding Class II bike lanes within the City's jurisdiction. This bike lane complies
with policies and direction given to staff in General Plan 2020 as well the 2011 San Rafael Bicycle/
Pedestrian Master Plan.
Limits of the proposed Class H bike lane
Staff recommends the installation of a Class II bike lane along Point San Pedro Road from Union Street
to the City limits with the exception of the following locations which should be maintained as a Class III
(shared) bike lane:
From
To
Descri tion
Union Street
City/County Limit near
Reinstall Class III
Mooring
bike lane on both
sides of Third
Street/Point San Pedro
Road
Point San Pedro
San Pedro Cove Entrance
Reinstall Class III
School Entrance
bike lane on south
side of the street
Point San Pedro
The City limits east of the
Reinstall Class III
Cove Entrance
Village at Loch Lomond
bike lane on south
Marina
side of the street
City staff has complied with the San Rafael General Plan and the San Rafael Bicycle/Pedestrian Master
plan by coordinating with the County of Marin and implementing improvements.
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 7
Exhibit C which is a general plan for the striping also delineates the areas within the County where they
have chosen to stripe the roadway as a Class II and a Class III bike lane.
During the City Council meeting, the public voiced concerns about vehicle speed, large truck traffic and
the safety of the cyclists. Point San Pedro Road is currently utilized by recreational cyclists, commuters
and members of the public. Sharing the road with live traffic while looking to see if a parked vehicle will
open its door or exit a parking space without identifying a cyclist is certainly a concern. Installing a bike
lane may not impact vehicle speed. However, even a limited dedicated bike facility should reduce the
risk of accidents.
FISCAL IMPACT: Delaying the striping until this meeting will cost the City at least $6,000 in
contractor remobilization expenses
ACTION REQUIRED:
1. Adopt the resolution approving and confirming staff's decision to install Class II bike lanes
along Point San Pedro Road, per Exhibit C. Staff recommends this option.
2. Do not install Class II bike facility and direct staff to maintain the existing Class III bike lane.
Staff does not recommend this option because it does not comply with the San Rafael
Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan.
3. Modify the resolution and change the limits of the Class II bike lane to install "No Parking"
signs on the North side of Point San Pedro Road from Bayview Drive to Manderly Road. All
other sections of the roadway shall be installed per Exhibit C. This option is also supported
by staff.
Enclosures:
- Exhibit A (Chronology of Relevant Events, August 18, 2014 Memo to the File)
- Exhibit B (Class I, II, III Bike lanes drawing)
- Exhibit C (Point San Pedro Class II and Class III bike lane)
- Exhibit D (Memo from Paul Jensen, Community Development Director)
- Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 13792
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND UPHOLDING STAFF'S DECISION TO
INSTALL A CLASS II BIKE LANE ON POINT SAN PEDRO ROAD WITHIN THE
CITY'S JURISDICTION
WHEREAS, the City of San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan, as adopted in 2002 and revised in 2011, identifies Point San Pedro Road as an
Existing Class III/Proposed Class II Bikeway (Class II where feasible); and
WHEREAS, the County of Marin has completed the resurfacing of
Point San Pedro Road from Union Street to the San Rafael Rock Quarry entrance with
the exception of the final striping of the shoulder area within the City jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, it is the City Council's policy, as identified in the San
Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, to require staff to implement the following:
Where feasible, include planning and design of bicycle and pedestrian
facilities as an integral part of the process for all transportation
improvements.
2. Seek funding for bicycle projects through regional, state and federal
funding programs.
3. Coordinate with multi jurisdictional planning, funding applications, and
system integration when appropriate.
WHEREAS, City staff is recommending the installation of a Class II
bike lane along Point San Pedro Road within the City's jurisdiction, with the exception
of installing a Class III bike lane in the locations shown on Attachment 1 (Exhibit C to
the staff report), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
WHEREAS the installation of a Class II bike lane at this time does not
violate any conditions of approval for the Village at Loch Lomond contained in City
Council Resolution No. 12332; and
WHEREAS modifications to the striping in front of the Village at Loch
Lomond can be modified at a later time if the parking study, performed 1 year after
occupancy, or as soon as practicable, shows that parking is necessary on Point San
Pedro Road; and
WHEREAS, the County of Marin has already installed signage and
striping for sections of Point San Pedro Road that are within their jurisdiction;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City
of San Rafael that it approves and authorizes the Public Works Director to instruct the
County of Marin to install Class II bike lane signage along the recently resurfaced
sections of Point San Pedro Road that are within the City's jurisdiction, with the
exception of installing Class III striping and signage in the locations shown in
Attachment 1.
I, ESTHER C. BEIRNE, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a
regular meeting of the Council of said City on the 18th day of August, 2014, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Councilmembers: Bushey, Colin, Connolly, McCullough & Mayor Phillips
NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
d?
ESTHER C. BEIRNE, City Clerk
File No.: 16.06.79
�� ., ._
6J., __. eora Hess y �Gy �o Des y�\N c�s` G ans�por� pecrc ��e �n�o��. 5
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 18, 2014 FILE NO: 16.06.79
TO: Note to File
FROM: Kevin McGowan, Assistant Public Works Director/City Engineer
RE: Point San Pedro Road Class H Bike Lane - Chronology of Events
The following is a chronology of events associated with the installation of a Class Il bike lane on Point
San Pedro Road. Although there are many other communications, e-mails, phone calls and relevant
documents associated with this subject, the items listed below are intended to provide a brief history to
be attached the City Council Report on this subject.
1998 The City of San Rafael formed the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee.
1999 The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and City staff initiated the
preparation of the San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
February 2002 The San Rafael City Council adopted the Bicycle Pedestrian Plan — Final Report.
The report identifies Point San Pedro as a proposed East-West Bike Route and shows
Point San Pedro Road as a Class II/IH Bike Route. The segment of Point San Pedro
from North San Pedro Road to Third Street is identified in the report as a priority
"A." Priority "A" projects were to be addressed in the first year following adoption
of the bike plan.
This document identifies policy actions in Objective B, which states that staff is
responsible for the following:
1. Where feasible, include planning and design of bicycle and pedestrian facilities
as an integral part of the process for all transportation improvements.
2. Seek funding for bicycle projects through regional, state and federal funding
programs.
3. Coordinate with multi jurisdictional planning, funding applications and system
integration when appropriate.
2002 to Present San Rafael Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee generally meets biannually to
discuss active bicycle/pedestrian projects within the City. These meetings are open
to the public.
November 2006 The Central Marin Countywide Bicycle Master Plan is developed in three workshops
in San Rafael to improve cohesion and connectivity of the bicycle and pedestrian
network in the City and to address the goals of the Non -Motorized Transportation
Pilot Program (NTPP). Marin County is one of four communities nationwide
selected by Congress to participate in the NTPP and to receive $25 million for
improvements to walkways and bicycle facilities.
Exhibit A Chronology
Point San Pedro Road Class II Bike Lane - Chronology of Events
August 18, 2014
Page 2 of 4
August 6, 2007 City Council adopts Resolution 12332 approving the development at Loch Lomond
Village.
May 22, 2008 BPAC reviewed the Plan Update and recommended its adoption by City Council.
August 26, 2008 Notice regarding the Initial Study/Negative Declaration prepared for this Plan was
published in the Marin IJ.
August 26, 2008 — September 15, 2008
Copies of the Initial Study/Negative Declaration were made available for a 20 day
review period by pertinent agencies and interested members of the public.
Sept. 15, 2008 City Council held a public hearing to adopt an update to the plan and the
corresponding negative declaration. Based on comments, City Council decided
improvements to the plan were required.
Fall 2010 Marin County opens discussions with the City about the San Rafael Rock Quarry
participating in resurfacing the roadway as part of the Quarry Permit.
January 13, 2011 BPAC Vice -Chair requests installing a Class 11 bike path on Point San Pedro Road.
March 2, 2011 BPAC voted unanimously to recommend adoption of the plan to City Council.
March 8, 2011 County Public Works Director initiates discussion with the City's Public Works
Director to resurface Point San Pedro Road.
March 14, 2011 Notice regarding the Initial Study/Negative Declaration prepared for this Plan was
published in the Marin IJ
March 14, 2011 — April 4, 2011 Copies of the Initial Study/Negative Declaration were made available for
a 20 -day review period by pertinent agencies and interested members of the public.
April 4, 2011 San Rafael City Council adopted the San Rafael Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan
Update, which shows Point San Pedro Road from Union to the City limits as
"Existing Class M/Proposed Class II Bikeway (Class II where feasible). This
document also reiterates the role of staff as stated above in the February 2002
document.
March 1, 2012 Resident e-mail requesting bike lanes on Point San Pedro Road.
February 13, 2013 Installation of the Class 11 bike lanes on Point San Pedro Road was discussed at the
BPAC meeting.
March 17, 2013 E-mail from Point San Pedro Road Coalition noting that they want to discuss the
installation of bike lanes on Point San Pedro Road.
May 21, 2013 A public meeting was held by the County of Marin, with City Staff present,
regarding the median project and the road resurfacing of Point San Pedro Road.
Supervisor Susan Adams presented several subjects, including the resurfacing of
Point San Pedro Road.
Exhibit A Chronology
Point San Pedro Road Class II Bike Lane - Chronology of Events
August 18, 2014
Page 3 of 4
May 2013 County of Marin wanted to install a test resurfacing section to allow residents and
the public to drive on Bonded Wearing Course Asphalt to determine if it is sound
attenuating and meets their requirements. The County, in working with Dutra
Materials, has a short window to place this material in August and requested that the
City assist by funding this portion of the work immediately.
May 28, 2014 E-mail from Alan Schaevitz.
August 12, 2013 City hires Windsor Fuel Company to install the test patch area. The County manages
construction in this area. Work completed within two weeks.
September 9, 2013 Grading permit issued for the grading to commence at the Village at Loch Lomond.
October 23, 2013 Installation of the Class II bike lanes on Point San Pedro Road was discussed at the
BPAC meeting.
January 12, 2014 E-mail from Kevin Hagarty — BPAC meeting.
January 21, 2014 Subdivision Map approved for the Village at Loch Lomond.
February 13, 2014 E-mail noting that the Point San Pedro Road Coalition Board of Directors supports
the installation of the Class II bike lane on Point San Pedro Road, except for keeping
the Class III lane from Bayview to Main, and in front of San Pedro School.
February 14, 2014 E-mail requesting a meeting regarding Loch Lomond HOA.
February 18, 2014 City Council approves the Memo of Understanding with the County of Marin for the
resurfacing of the road allowing the County to take the lead on the project.
February 25, 2014 County of Marin approves the plans and specifications for the resurfacing of Point
San Pedro Road.
March 24, 2014 County of Marin Authorizes the Construction of the resurfacing project to MCK
Services, Inc. of Martinez in the amount of $1,206,628.80.
April 7, 2014 Marin County Public Works hosts a public meeting to address the public's comments
on the proposed construction project. In addition to standard construction questions,
the County notes the inclusion of the Class II bike lane in the plans and identified the
areas where a Class III bike lane would be maintained (from Bayview to Main
eastbound, San Pedro School south of the school entrance eastbound, Union to
Mooring Road both east and westbound).
April 8, 2014 City communicates via e-mail with Alan Schaevitz. Representatives from the Loch
Lomond HOA believed that the Village at Loch Lomond has sufficient parking on
site and would not impact the adjacent community. The proposed Class II bike path
should be acceptable.
April 8, 2014 Point San Pedro Road Coalition indicates in an e-mail that the onsite parking for
Loch Lomond Village is more than adequate for the use and that installing a Class II
bike lane seems appropriate.
May 16, 2014 MCK services starts construction.
Exhibit A Chronology
Point San Pedro Road Class II Bike Lane - Chronology of Events
August 18, 2014
Page 4 of 4
July 14, 2014 MCK finalized main paving construction. Striping and signage to follow.
June 20, 2014 County of Marin e-mailed residents and Coalition members.
June 25, 2014 Federation of San Rafael Neighborhoods met and discussed the installation of bike
lanes on Point San Pedro Road. The City and the Federation made a compromise to
reinstall a Class III bike lane on the south side of the road at the Village at Loch
Lomond, from Union to Mooring and in front of the field on the south side of the
road at San Pedro School.
June 25, 2014 Point San Pedro Road Coalition forwards a letter to the City Council objecting to the
installation of the Class 11 bike lane in front of the Village at Loch Lomond.
July 8, 2014 Letter from Point San Pedro Road Coalition requests that the striping in front of the
Village at Loch Lomond be delayed until two years after completion of the
development.
July 21, 2014 San Rafael City Council received public comments on the installation of bike lanes
on Point San Pedro Road.
August 6, 2014 Public Works staff met with the San Pedro School principal. She is expecting the
enrollment to increase next year from 490 to 510 and is further expecting enrollment
to expand within two years to 690 students. The principal requested that the parking
on both sides of the road remain and that parking from Bellevue Avenue to the
school entrance be removed. She also noted that they host large events during which
street parking is essential. At this time, the principal was not aware of any expansion
of the parking at this site to accommodate any increase in enrollment.
Exhibit A Chronology
EXHIBIT B
BICYCLE LANE DESIGNATION
REFERENCED FROM THE SAN RAFAEL BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN
Class I Bicycle Facility: Referred to as a bicycle path. It provides for two-way bicycle
travel on a paved right-of-way completely separated from any street or highway. These
are described in Section 1003.1 of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual.
Class II Bicycle Facility: Referred to as a bicycle lane. It provides a striped and
stenciled lane for one-way travel on a street or highway. These are described in
Section 1003.2 of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual.
Class III Bicycle Facility: Referred to as a bicycle route. It provides for shared use with
pedestrian or motor vehicle traffic and is identified by signing and (sometimes) 'Shared
Roadway Bicycle Marking' or `Sharrow' stenciling. These are described in Section
1003.3 of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual.
BIKE PATH
::<EearO
vzxLZ)Z s
uoro�::Eo �iu�r
r4LES
�•✓`4,14
1
BIKE LANE
BIKE ROUTE
v^ow G
Class I
AlSmII
Class Ili
Figure 1-1
Class 1, 11 and III Bicycle Facilities
etz\'�6 .n0 ] San. a kes...a g (Cty—county)\Oes qr\Pans\oes�gn Pans\pcnt so p aro bre e.n�pt.Ewg
o-0
2z
�cp
DD
Z Z
m o
om
ao
O�
�a
�V)
—„
z n
o z
a �
a
m O
m
m�
m
A
m
D vl
C m L T
cn
A N
11)\Design\Plc-s\Design Plons�yont s tlwg
MATCHLINE - SEE ABOVE
i
C-) C) m c m ��Irm
c m O mm
z r A �rz
j O D
C z
o U)m m
m
z F- r
m D
zr V)
cn
(n D _
Z
m
n
D
U)
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 5, 2014
TO: Nader Mansourian, Public Works Director &
Kevin McGowan, Deputy Public Works Director
FROM: Paul Jensen, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Village @ Loch Lomond Marina Development; project parking studies and approved
parking for development
You have requested that I prepare a memorandum that summarizes the recommendations and
findings of the parking studies prepared for the Village at Loch Lomond Marina development
(Village). Of particular interest is the relationship of the Village development parking requirements
(including the requirement for a post -development parking study) with the Point San Pedro Road
bicycle route classification that was in-place at the time of project approval (2007).
I reviewed the parking studies prepared for the Village development including the Village at Loch
Lomond Marina Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR), and the numerous staff reports
prepared for public hearings on the project. All of these documents were prepared to support the
City Council's August 7, 2007 action to adopt Resolution 12332. This resolution approves (among
others) the Master Use Permit for the Village development (UP04-007), which includes condition 7.
Master Use Permit Condition 7 requires monitoring of on-site parking and a post -development
parking study. This condition is presented under Summary & Facts, below.
This memorandum is formatted into two sections: a) Summary of Facts & Findings; and b) History
and Background. The former section summarizes the key points and findings which are critical to
responding to your request. The latter section provides more detailed facts on the Village project
history and background to support the summary of facts and findings.
SUMMARY OF FACTS & FINDINGS
➢ San Rafael General Plan Neighborhood Element Policy NH-118a(d) specifically requires that a
parking analysis be prepared for the Loch Lomond marina site. The purpose of the analysis is to
establish adequate parking requirements for the development of the site with mixed-use.
The Village development parking requirements for the marina and marina support facilities
were based on parking demand analyses (parking accumulation studies). However, the City
municipal code requirements for off-street parking were used for the residential and
neighborhood commercial components of the project.
EXHIBIT D - CDD MEMO
➢ Two parking studies were conducted for the Village project. The first parking study was
commissioned by the developer and prepared by W -Trans, transportation engineers. The W -
Trans study was structured to focus on shared parking within the marina site. An independent
parking study was commissioned by the City for the preparation of the project EIR. The
independent study was conducted by Kimley-Horn Associates, Inc. (KHA), transportation
engineers (2004-2007). The KHA study focused on studying parking demand and parking use at
other similar marinas. Note: A separate, two-year assessment of dry dock boat storage use
was completed by City staff, which found that the storage use activity and demand is very low.
During this review period, it was determined that many of the boats stored were unregistered
or inoperable.
➢ As proposed and approved, the on-site parking for the residential (81 units) and neighborhood
commercial use (grocery store and commercial space = 22,250 square feet) components of the
Village development meet or exceed the City Code requirements (collective surplus of 54
spaces).
As proposed and approved, the 12 parking spaces provided for the publicly -accessible park
(marina green, jetties and breakwater) were deemed to be adequate by KHA. The adequacy of
this parking was based on a survey of parking supply and use in other City parks.
The approved parking for the marina and marina support services does not meet City parking
requirement (3 spaces/4 berths + parking required for each marina support services use).
However, the City parking requirement for a marina use is excessive and does not reflect the
true parking demand for a marina use. A strict application of the parking code would require
427 spaces. Based on the findings of the parking studies, this use component of the project was
proposed and approved with 294 spaces (259 spaces + 27 day -use vehicle + trailer spaces 16 dry
dock boat storage spaces with potential conversion to day -use vehicle + trailer spaces). KHA
determined that the proposed parking would meet peak demand for the marina and marina
support uses. The difference between the parking code requirement and the determined
parking demand is 133 spaces.
KHA reported that overflow parking onto City streets was not factored into the demand analysis
and no reliance of on -street parking along Point San Pedro Road or beyond was considered in
the recommendations for the parking study. However, given the proximity and orientation of
proposed residential units fronting Point San Pedro Road, use of on -street parking would occur
because of convenience (source: Planning Commission staff report, 5/8/2007)
➢ As a safeguard, KHA recommended: a) a post -development study of marina parking (not
applicable to residential or neighborhood commercial as these use elements meet or exceed
the code requirements); and b) inclusion of a "parking reserve" area to accommodate any
additional spaces if, after study, it is determined to be needed (29 spaces designated on plan)
and a "landscape reserve" for parking found to be unnecessary (26 spaces designated on plan).
The post -development parking study was incorporated as Master Use Permit condition 7 in
Resolution 12332, which is presented below.
The consideration to require a Class II bicycle lane along the property frontage surfaced late in
the Village review process and was first discussed by the Planning Commission in 5/2007
(following the completion of the project EIR and parking demand studies). The 5/8/2007
Planning Commission staff report summarizes the Class II/III bicycle route issue, which is
discussed in detail in the following History and Background section of this memo. Ultimately,
the Village project was approved to maintain the current Class III route (shared with travel lane
and maintaining on -street parking) along the property frontage of Point San Pedro Road, but
included a requirement to review the on -street parking use and demand along this street
frontage as part of the post development parking study (Master Use Permit condition 7. See
condition 7g below, which states: "In the event the updated parking study determines that the
on -street parking demand is low, the City may proceed with implementing a Class II bicycle lane
along the entire property frontage." This condition is applicable to the property frontage along
Point San Pedro Road only. This condition is not applicable to the on -street parking along any
other segments along Point San Pedro Road.
City Council approved Village project in 8/2007. City Council Resolution 12332, Use Permit
(UP04-007) includes condition 7, which reads as follows:
7. This Master Use Permit is approved subject to monitoring on-site parking for marina and
recreation uses and on -street parking along the Point San Pedro Road property frontage.
On-site parking for the marina and recreation uses (Area A 1 & 2) is authorized based on
peak parking demand and shall be subject to the following conditions and monitoring
requirements:
a. A total of 259 vehicle parking spaces and 27 vehicle + trailer parking spaces (35
spaces proposed) are required as presented on the approved Development Plan.
The parking plan also includes and approves a 'parking reserve' (landscaping that
can be converted to parking) and a 'landscape reserve' (parking that can be
converted to landscaping) for future use.
b. Twelve(12) of the total vehicle parking spaces shall be marked and reserved for
public use of the shoreline, recreation and park facilities during daytime hours (dawn
to dusk). Of the 12 spaces, four (4) shall be designated on the west spit, five (5) shall
be designated on the east spit and three (3) shall be designated shall be designated
at the southern terminus of the marina parking lot (entrance top breakwater). Signs
shall be placed at these locations designating public use of these parking spaces
during the daytime hours.
c. The 52 liveaboards berth tenants shall be provided assigned parking at a ratio of
one parking space per berth. The assigned spaces shall be distributed throughout
the site at points closest to the access to docks.
d. The Use Permit approves the use of eight (8) of the 35 vehicle + trailer parking
spaces in the marina day use parking lot (presented on the Development Plan) for
16 dry dock boat storage spaces rented on a month-to-month basis. Per condition
7.f. below, the dry dock boat storage shall be monitored with the marina parking
and may be phased out should the demand for vehicle + trailer day use parking
exceed 27 spaces.
e. The marina operator shall implement a valet parking program or similar parking
management program for vehicle + trailer day use parking during peak use days
(summer holidays). The valet parking program shall be submitted to the City prior to
the issuance of a building permit. While it is not expected that peak demand will
exceed 27 vehicle + trailer spaces for marina use, the program is required as a
3
contingency measure. If valet parking is implemented, all parking shall be
accommodated on-site.
f. Two (2) years following completion and occupancy of the project (build -out), an
updated parking study shall be prepared and submitted to the City. The updated
parking study shall be prepared by a licensed Traffic Engineer approved by the City
and funded by the project sponsor or the project Owners' Association to assess
marina and recreation parking demand. The updated parking study shall be
submitted to the Community Development Department for review and shall include
the following actions:
1) In the event the parking demand report finds that additional parking is
recommended to meet increased demand, the City shall require the
implementation of the 'parking reserve.'
2) In the event demand is less than supply, the City may consider allowing the
implantation of the 'landscape reserve.'
3) In the event the parking demand report finds that the demand for marina
day use vehicle + trailer parking exceeds the 27 spaces that are provided,
the 16 dry dock boat storage spaces shall be considered for conversion to
eight (8) vehicle + trailer spaces.
g. The updated parking study required in 7,f above shall also assess the extent of on -
street parking use along the Point San Pedro Road property frontage with the
current Class 111 bicycle route (route shared with vehicle travel lane and parking
lane). In the event the updated parking study determines that the on -street parking
demand is low, the City may proceed with implementing a Class 11 bicycle lane along
the entire property frontage.
h. If, at any time, project -generated parking is occurring on residential streets outside
the project boundary, other than on Point San Pedro Road, the Community
Development Director may require: 1) modifications to the enforcement activities by
the Owners' Association; or 2) initiation of the updated parking study and
consideration of on-site parking modifications by the City Council.
HISTORY AND BACKGROUND
San Rafael General Plan 2020- Program NH -118a
In 2004, the City adopted the San Rafael General Plan 2020. Included in the Neighborhood
Element of the General Plan is Policy NH -118, which specifically addresses the Loch Lomond
Marina site. Policy NH -118 and accompanying Programs NH -118a — c set forth specific land use
and design recommendations for property redevelopment. Program NH -118a addresses
specific design and review measures that are to be followed for site development. NH-118a(d)
presents the following measure that is specific to the review of parking for a mixed-use
development on this site:
d. Require a mixed use parking analysis to establish adequate parking requirements.
Given that the General Plan recommends retaining the marina and marina support services,
along with new neighborhood commercial, residential uses and publicly -accessible park area
(mixed-use), this program was intended to determine parking adequacy and need through a
parking analysis.
4
W -Trans Parking Study Prepared for Village Development Application
Following the 2004 adoption of the San Rafael General Plan 2020, development applications
were filed for the Village at Loch Lomond Marina (late 2004). This application included the
submittal of a parking study prepared by W -Trans, transportation engineers, which was
commissioned by the property owner. The parking study is included in the Traffic Impact Study
for the Loch Lomond Marina Mixed -Use- Updated Report, dated April 6, 2005. This study is
available in project EIR, Volume Il, Appendix C of the Village at Loch Lomond Marina Final EIR
(February 2006).
The W -Trans parking study utilized the Urban Land Institute Guidelines for assessing parking
demand in mixed-use developments, which included a review of 'shared' parking. W -Trans
completed parking counts at the marina site, Hourly parking counts were accumulated over
weekdays, Saturday and a holiday weekend (Memorial Day) during one season. The parking
counts were taken for each land use at the marina site from 6:00am to noon. Parking demand
was calculated for each hour to determine peak parking demand.
Based on the accumulation studies, W -Trans determined that the peak parking demand for the
whole project (all uses collectively), at project build -out is 531 parking spaces. As approved
(August 2007), the project proposes 618 parking spaces, which exceeds the demand
determined by W -Trans.
Kimley-Horn & Associates (KHA) Parking Studies Prepared for Project EIR
Initially, a peer review of the W -Trans study was to be conducted by the City for the project EIR.
However, during the EIR scoping process, the City determined that it would be prudent to hire a
traffic engineering consultant to conduct an independent parking demand study for the project
for the following reasons:
1. The W -Trans study of parking demand focused on 'shared' parking among the mix of land
uses within the development. The independent study would focus assessment of parking
needs by individual land use.
2. Independent parking counts should be conducted for a more extended period of time
(varying seasons and peak periods) to confirm the counts documented by W -Trans.
3. The findings of the two independent parking studies were to be compared and incorporated
into the project EIR.
Kimley-Horn & Associates (KHA), transportation engineers was hired to conduct the parking
assessment for the Village project EIR. The parking study prepared by KHA provides an analysis
and presents recommendations based on the premise that all parking would be provided on the
project site. As noted, no reliance of on -street parking along Point San Pedro Road was
considered in the recommendations for this parking study. The scope of the parking study is
summarized as follows:
• KHA recommended that the residential and neighborhood commercial use components of
the project be designed to meet City parking code requirements.
5
For the marina and supportive marina uses (e.g., bait shop, harbormaster's office, boat
repair, yacht club), KHA recommended the assessment of parking demand as the City code
requirement is excessive and does not reflect true or actual marina parking demand and
use. The City's parking requirement for a marina use is three parking spaces for every four
marina berths, plus parking calculated and required for each supportive marina use. The
base parking requirement for berths assumes that the parking need at any one given time is
three parking spaces for every four berths, which likely never occurs.
Similar to the W -Trans study, the KHA parking demand study for the marina and supportive
marina uses was based on surveys and daily parking counts taken at the marina site over a
2.5 -year period (parking accumulation study), particularly focusing on the summer season
and summer holidays when marina use is at its peak. The daily count totals for parking use
at the marina ranged from 45-257 spaces collected by KHA. Other parking count sources
were documented in the EIR (counts from W -Trans, City staff and Point San Pedro Road
Coalition) showing a range of present parking use from 124-337 spaces (source: Final EIR,
Table 3.4-13).
KHA also incorporated parking study findings from surveys of other similar/comparable
marinas.
Based on the collective 2.5 -years of parking counts and an assessment of other marinas, KHA
found that:
a. The marina parking exceeds peak demand periods of summer weekend use, which are
231 spaces at 85% marina occupancy and 244 spaces at 100% marina occupancy.
b. The highest demand and use of marina parking is by liveaboards (there are 52
liveaboards at the Loch Lomond Marina).
c. The average demand for marina day -use vehicle + trailer parking is 27 spaces.
As reported to the Planning Commission on April 24, 2006, the neighborhood commercial and
residential use components of the project meet or exceed the minimum parking requirements
set forth in the San Rafael Municipal Code. While marina and recreation uses parking is based
on the results of the parking demand study, the provisions of a "parking reserve" provide a
contingency measure for adding 25 spaces if it is deemed necessary. For these reasons, KHA
concluded that overflow parking is not likely to occur on Point San Pedro Road. However, KHA
reported that given the proximity and orientation of the proposed residential units fronting
Point San Pedro Road, use of on -street parking would occur because of convenience.
Regarding the publicly -accessible park area within the development, the City's municipal code
does not include a parking requirement for public park land use. KHA reported that the
Institute of Transportation Engineers, Parking Generation 3rd Edition contains only one category
for park use. This park use category reflects larger, community -sized parks with active
recreation areas with playing fields for organized sports. KHA determined that this parking
requirement was appropriate for smaller, neighborhood parks with less active recreation
improvements (e.g., children's play equipment, picnic areas). For this reason, a parking survey
0
was conducted of the City parks with recreation uses and improvements similar to the publicly -
accessible park improvements in the Village development. Eleven Bay Are local jurisdictions
were polled (October 2006) and none have an adopted parking standard for parks. KHA
recommended a parking standard of 4.5-5.0 parking spaces per acre of park land, which is the
amount of parking provided for the three -acre Redwood Village Park in North San Rafael. A
parking demand survey of similar neighborhood parks in San Rafael was conducted to
determine parking usage (November 2006). Based on the findings of the survey, the 12 -parking
spaces designated for the park area within the Village development was determined to be
adequate.
As discussed above, the parking study prepared by KHA provides an analysis and presents
recommendations based on the premise that all parking would be provided on the project site.
Overflow parking onto City streets was not factored into the demand analysis and no reliance of
on -street parking along Point San Pedro Road was considered in the recommendations for this
parking study.
Public Review Process for Village Project
The Village development project was subject to a very lengthy and comprehensive public review
process that spanned over three years. Twenty-five public hearings and meetings were held,
which included numerous Planning Commission study sessions focusing on specific project
topics and issues of community interest (including parking and dry dock boat storage). During
the review process, a lot of attention was given to this issue for several reasons: a) the Village
development is comprised of a mix of land uses with differing parking requirements and parking
demands; b) while most of the project complies with the City parking standards, the parking
proposed for the marina and marina support uses was based on parking demand studies rather
than a rigid code requirement; and c) the community residents were concerned that the
proposed parking for the Village is inadequate and there would likely be parking spillover into
the adjacent neighborhoods (specifically, Loch Lomond). As a result of the comments from the
Planning Commission workshop, KHA completed some additional analysis of parking demand
for the marina use.
The parking studies and a detailed assessment of parking were included in the four -volume
Village at Loch Lomond Marina Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR), February 2006. Over
the course of 2.5 years, two, independent parking studies were conducted by licensed traffic
engineers. Ultimately, the EIR reported that the traffic engineers determined that the project
would result in less -than -significant parking impacts. No special mitigation measures were
required in the EIR in that the project: a) meets the parking requirements set forth in the San
Rafael Municipal Code for the residential, neighborhood commercial and grocery store/market
land uses; and b) the marina use and recreation meet the parking demand for peak use
periods. Nonetheless, the project sponsor agreed to the precautionary requirement to conduct
a post -development parking study (specified in Resolution 12331. Further, the project sponsor
proposed and committed to impose a parking valet plan for marina day use in the event that
additional parking was warranted over and above the use of the parking reserve.
During the three-year project review process, the Planning Commission conducted special study
sessions on specific project topics including parking (10/2006) and dry dock boat storage
(5/2006). At the study session on parking, the Planning Commission supported significantly
7
reducing or eliminating dry dock boat storage to increase amount of marina and day use parking
(vehicle + trailer parking). Planning Commission found that dry dock boat storage was not the
highest and best use for redevelopment of the marina site.
Approved Parking for Village Development
In August 2007, the City Council approved the Village at Loch Lomond Marina development
project (Village). The City approvals grant the development of: a) 81 residential units; b)
22,000+ square feet of neighborhood commercial use (including a new grocery store); and c) a
publicly -accessible marina green and shoreline park. Further, the approvals grant the continued
operation of and improvements to the 517 -berth marina along with marina support services.
The following table presents the proposed and approved parking along with the parking study
findings:
Approved Land Use
Propasedl/Appraved Parking.
Parking study Findings
Residential (81 units)
218 (2 spaces/unit + 56 guest
Exceeds City parking code
spaces)
standard
Grocery Store/
95 spaces
Exceeds City parking code
Neighborhood Commercial
standard
Recreation
12 spaces
Meets parking demand
(publicly -accessible park)
based on City park study
Marina and marina support
294 spaces+
Meets parking demand for
uses (boat repair, yacht club,
peak time marina use++
harbormaster's office)
Total parking on-site parking
619 spaces+++
spaces
+ 294 total parking spaces includes 259 parking spaces 52 designated for liveaboard
berths), 35 vehicle + trailers day use spaces and 16 dry dock boat storages spaces; 52
designated liveaboard berth parking spaces
++ City parking code would require 427 parking spaces (3 spaces/4 berths + parking
required for each supportive marina use)
+++ "Parking Reserve" could add 29 spaces; "Landscape Reserve" could delete 26 spaces
There have been no changes to the Village project since City approvals in 8/2007. The scope
and type of land uses that were approved have not changed. However, since 2007, a Mello -
Roos Assessment District has been formed to fund the maintenance of the publicly -accessible
park and the Final Subdivision Map for the first phase of development has been recorded with
the County of Marin. Site grading is underway.
Relationship to Point San Pedro Road Bicycle Route
As you are aware, at the time the Village development project was in process (2004-2007), the
2002 -adopted City of San Rafael Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan was in effect. This 2002 plan
designated Point San Pedro Road as a Class II/III bicycle route.
The consideration to require a Class II bicycle lane along the property frontage was first
discussed by the Planning Commission (5/2007), following the completion of the project EIR and
parking demand studies. The request for the City to require the Village development to install
I
a Class II bicycle lane along the Point San Pedro Road property frontage was made by the Marin
bicycle advocates.
The report to Planning Commission (source: Planning Commission staff report dated 5/8/2007)
summarizes the Class II bicycle lane issue and presents following facts, findings and
recommendations from KHA and City staff:
• The Village property frontage width along Point San Pedro Road can accommodate up to 50
parallel parking spaces; parking would be eliminated if a Class II bicycle lane is striped.
• If a Class II lane is implemented, any overflow of parking from project site could occur on
the north side of Point San Pedro Road, which would be the next closest area available for
on -street parking.
• KHA reported that people will generally walk a distance of 500 feet from the parking to the
point of destination. However, KHA qualified that as Point San Pedro Road is a wide, busy
street, it creates a barrier/constraint that would deter marina visitors from parking on the
north side of the street and beyond.
• The Village project can be conditioned to require the project sponsor to install a Class II lane
along the Point San Pedro Road property frontage only within the existing public right-of-
way. The City's authority and ability to exact this improvement from the property owner is
set forth in the City's Subdivision ordinance (requirements for street frontage
improvements). Requiring a Class II lane along other segments of Point San Pedro Road is
beyond authority of City's exaction powers, unless it is determined that the project creates
a nexus for such an improvement.
The staff report acknowledged that at that time (2007), a detailed study of the Point San
Pedro Road corridor is necessary to determine the impacts of on -street parking and
available road right-of-way to accommodate a Class II bicycle lane. It was reported that
such a study would need to be commissioned by and coordinated between the City and
County. Report also notes that a Class II lane is good along this corridor because: a) the
road is fairly wide and divided and that the majority of the development along this corridor
is low density residential and accessed from other streets; and b) on -street parking is rarely
used because many of the residential areas do not front Point San Pedro Road, with
exceptions such as San Pedro Elementary School and several residential areas (e.g., Bayside
Acres/Pigeon Point).
Since the 2007 City approvals for the Village development, the City adopted an update of the
City of San Rafael Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan (2011). This updated master plan designates
Point San Pedro Road as a "Existing Class III/Proposed Class II Bikeway (Class II where feasible)."
9
Sources:
Village at Loch Lomond Marina Final Environmental Impact Report (certified August 2007),
which includes:
Traffic Impact Study for Loch Lomond Marina Mixed Use- Updated Report, April 6, 2005; W -
Trans
The Parking Analysis for the Village at Loch Lomond Marina, KHA; June 2005 and updates
for Final EIR, February 2007
Planning Commission Staff Report, October 24, 2006 (workshop on Village development
parking)
Project Chronology/Summary, April 2007
Planning Commission Staff Report, April 24, 2007
Planning Commission Staff Report, May 8, 2007
City Council Staff Report, July 16, 2007
Lchlmnd,prkng memo 8 5 14
10
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND UPHOLDING STAFF'S DECISION TO
INSTALL A CLASS II BIKE LANE ON POINT SAN PEDRO ROAD WITHIN THE
CITY'S JURISDICTION
WHEREAS, the City of San Rafael Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan
was adopted in 2002 and revised in 2011 identifies Point San Pedro Road as an Existing
Class III/Proposed Class II Bikeway (Class II where feasible); and
WHEREAS, the County of Marin has completed the resurfacing of
Point San Pedro Road from Union Street to the San Rafael Rock Quarry Entrance with
the exception of the final striping of the shoulder area within the City jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, it is the City Council's policy as identified in the Sara
Rafael Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan to require staff to implement the following:
1. Where feasible, include planning and design of bicycle and pedestrian
facilities as an integral part of the process for all transportation
improvements.
2. Seek funding for bicycle projects through regional state and federal
funding programs
3. Coordinate with multi jurisdictional planning and finding application and
system integration when appropriate.
WHEREAS, City staff is recommending the installation of a Class II
bike lane along Point San Pedro Road within the City's jurisdiction, with the exception
of installing a Class III Bike lane in the locations shown on Attachment 1 (Exhibit C to
the Staff Report), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
WHEREAS the installation of a Class II bike lane at this time does not
violate any conditions of approval for the Village at Loch Lomond contained in City
Council Resolution No. 12332; and
WHEREAS modifications to the striping in front of the Village at Loch
Lomond can be modified at a later time if the parking study performed two years after
the project is completed shows that parking is necessary on Point San Pedro Road; and
WHEREAS, the County of Marin has already installed signage and
striping for sections of Point San Pedro Road that are within their jurisdiction;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City
of San Rafael that it approves and authorizes the Public Works Director to instruct the
County of Marin to install Class II bike lane signage along the recently resurfaced
sections of Point San Pedro Road that are within the City jurisdiction, with the
exception of installing Class III striping and signage in the locations shown in
Attachment 1.
I, ESTHER C. BEIRNE, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a
regular meeting of the Council of said City on the 18th day of August, 2014, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ESTHER C. BEIRNE, City Clerk
File No.: 16.06.79
u\t6 is\t6.06 Q eriay\16 G
SI—�� ��� "'}
� 4"
IIII 4k,M
t
�x
ro
T �
OCH,
71 LOMAND
R
U
LEITH
LANE
v 9
O
20 zs
>cp
D cp
Z D
� Z
m
oM
C) o
C) 0
n O
sm
cn T
z n
O Z
m O
z
m y
ATTACHMENT 1
<'u)
Ln>M
--I
170
>jo D
U)c7u
r� z
.DC7
T
AQUA'
VISTA
DR
ROYAL A`
CT r
pORTO
BELLOw4
DR
N n
Z�
>
D
m
r
o ani
Fye
9
` 0
�"\t6 Strecis\16.06 �Cver!ay\Io.O
O0
Z
Ul y
Z D
Z Z
m 0
mm
00
o A
n O
m
c') D
z D
Z 0
c Z
L)
CD
mr O
D m
z�
m
u
ATTACHMENT 1
i
i"
0 5F s n CD C 7
c
z
z
O � mrZi
K: W C7
D
D m �
Z U) r cn
(n D
Z
m
C)
r
D
cn
fr'
CD
0
MATCHLINE - SEE ABOVE
C
,
_3W
f
Al
x
i 0
A�
{ O
TI
77 41
D
#
4
3 #x
0)0Al
a r
O0
Z
Ul y
Z D
Z Z
m 0
mm
00
o A
n O
m
c') D
z D
Z 0
c Z
L)
CD
mr O
D m
z�
m
u
ATTACHMENT 1
i
i"
0 5F s n CD C 7
c
z
z
O � mrZi
K: W C7
D
D m �
Z U) r cn
(n D
Z
m
C)
r
D
cn
fr'
CD
0
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
ROUTING SLIP / APPROVAL FORM
INSTRUCTIONS: USE THIS FORM WITH EACH SUBMITTAL OF A CONTRACT, AGREEMENT,
ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION BEFORE APPROVAL BY COUNCIL / AGENCY.
SRCC AGENDA ITEM NO.
DATE OF MEETING: August 18, 2014
FROM: Nader Mansourian
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DATE: August 8, 2014
FILE NO.: 16.06.79
TITLE OF DOCUMENT: A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND UPHOLDING STAFF'S DECISION TO
INSTALL A CLASS II BIKE LANE ON POINT SAN PEDRO ROAD WITHIN THE CITY'S JURIDICTION
Department Head (signature)
(LOWER HALF OF FORM FOR APPROVALS ONLY)
APPROVED AS COUNCIL / AGENCY
AGEN[ sA.-I�T,EM: f`l (
City Manager (signature),
NOT APPROVED
REMARKS:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
v -0 Y, /
r
City Attorney (signature)'
Law Office of Edward E. Yates
1000 Fourth Street, Suite 800
San Rafael, CA 94901
415-526-6314
eyates@mariniandlaw.com
August 13, 2014
Gary Phillips, Mayor
Members of the City Council
City of San Rafael
1400 Fifth Avenue, Room 203
PO Box 151560
San Rafael, CA 94915-1560
Dear Mr. Mayor and Members of the Town Council;
I represent the Loch Lomond Homeowners Association (Loch Lomond) in regard to the Point San Pedro
Resurfacing project (Project). Loch Lomond greatly appreciates the City Council's decision to reconsider
its direction on the Project and to convene a special meeting to arrive at a resolution.
First, as the members of Loch Lomond have previously told the City, Loch Lomond has no objection to
better bicycle planning and safety on Pt. San Pedro Road. However, the Loch Lomond community urges
the City to not reverse the City Council's clear commitment to Loch Lomond to prepare a parking study
before restriping Point San Pedro Road. Instead, my client urges your Council to maintain the agreed
upon commitment by your Council, which will result in both a better planned bike lane and a project
which has buy -in from the community.
In a meeting on August 12, 2014, Public Works Director Nader Mansourian proposed a solution that we
believe would meet all parties' concerns regarding the Project. In brief, the proposal is to allow parking
on the south side of Pt. San Pedro Road and to establish a de facto Class II bike lane on the north side by
establishing a "No Parking" zone. Permitted event parking would provide flexibility. After occupancy
of the Marina development project, the City could work with the developer to require the parking study
if the City staff found that parking issues were indeed arising. Loch Lomond supports this logical
proposal from City staff and urges the City Council to adopt it.
1. Approval of the restriping would constitute a breach of the City's 2007 Commitment to Loch
Lomond
During project planning for the Marina development project, Loch Lomond pointed out deficiencies in
the Marina project EIR and parking studies.1 Loch Lomond believes the Marina development project
1 Loch Lomond pointed out several inaccuracies in those studies in 2007. For instance, a quick review of the CEQA
analysis and development project findings shows the EIR's analysis was based on the assumption that a certain
amount of residential parking would be provided yet the Conditions of Approval do not include that condition.
will have inadequate parking and many Loch Lomond residents have separately calculated that
potentially 300 hundred Marina development residents and recreational users will need to park outside
the Marina. Loch Lomond believes both sides of Pt. San Pedro Road will be needed to accommodate
this overflow parking.
Because of these potential impacts, Loch Lomond has been relying on the City to honor its 2007
commitment to not install a Class II bike lane on Pt. San Pedro Road until a parking study has been
prepared. (See Condition of Approval 7(f) for Marina Development Project Master Use Permit,
Resolution 12332, Master Use Permit, p. 18 ) One may view the study as simply a mitigation measure
for the project. However, the record — the Staff Report and the Environmental Impact Report - show
that the City contended that there was adequate parking and that the Project would cause no parking
impacts on Point San Pedro Road or Loch Lomond. (Resolution 12330, CECW Findings, p. 8, Impact 3.4-
5.) Thus, the City's reason for approving Condition 7(f) was not to mitigate the impacts but instead was
an effort by the City to avoid litigation and offer a settlement agreement condition to benefit Loch
Lomond. In our meeting on August 12, City Planning Director Jensen's explanation of the history of the
Marina development project confirmed this.
Despite this promise and Loch Lomond's continuing concern, the City has proposed not fulfilling its
promise to Loch Lomond to not stripe the Road until a study was prepared. As I understand it, in 2011,
the City adopted the Master Bicycle Plan, which provided for a Class II bicycle lane on Pt. San Pedro
Road. What that meant was the City Council had approved two competing, inconsistent policies
regarding this issue, one to wait to study the issue and the other to quickly restripe the road. To Loch
Lomond, approval of the restriping would mean the City Council is unilaterally reversing its agreement
with Loch Lomond and not carrying out its commitment to the community. If the City meant to reverse
its commitment made to Loch Lomond, it should have convened a fully noticed and transparent hearing
to amend Resolution 12332. It did not do so.
Despite the existence of Resolution 12332, a review of the City's entire Pt. San Pedro Road project file
showed little consideration of the potential parking issues of the Project when the Master Bike Plan was
approved four years later. Why does this matter? One reason is that restriping Pt. San Pedro Road will
preclude any usefulness of the Condition of Approval and the promised parking study. Once the
infrastructure investment has been made and the restriping accomplished, any promised parking study
will have little utility as it is unlikely the City would reverse course after establishing a Class II bike lane.
Again, the reason for the bike study condition of approval was that the City mollified Loch Lomond by
promising that the Study would be done before restriping was done. This path still makes sense.
Fulfilling the commitment to Loch Lomond as Mr. Mansourian has suggested allows the City to meet its
commitments and meet its policy of improved bicycle safety.
Another example of the inadequacy of the parking analysis was the conclusion in the Planning Commission Staff
Report that elimination of parking on San Pedro would not cause parking impacts because overflow parking would
not occur on San Pedro Road. Yet the very next sentence acknowledges that this assumption is wrong because
"use of on street parking would occur because of convenience." (Planning Commission Staff Report, 5-8-2007, p.
14.) Thus, the City's own conclusions regarding overflow parking contradict the assumptions of the traffic study.
OA
2. The City has not complied with CEQA and thus, may not move ahead with the Proiect
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that a municipality must consider the
environmental impacts of any project before it approves a project. (California Public Resources Code §
21000 et seq.) The record shows, however, that neither the City nor the County completed the
required CEQA compliance previous to the decisions that have led to the project.
The City has not prepared any CEQA documentation for the project but contends that as a responsible
agency it may rely on the lead agency's (Marin County) Notice of Exemption (NOE) for the project.
However, the March 24 NOE was filed by the County after the City Council approved the MOU on
February18. Thus, that NOE cannot be used for CEQA compliance for the City's earlier decision to
approve the Project because NOEs prepared prior to decisions are not valid under CEQA. ( See, e.g.,
CEQA Guidelines § 15062(b); Coalition for Clean Air v. City of Visalia (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 408 - NOE
filed before project approval is invalid and does not trigger the running of the applicable limitations
period).2
Also, Section 15096 of the CEQA Guidelines provides that responsible agencies must make their own
determination regarding the environmental impacts of the project. In the case at hand, the City did not
consider the new circumstances regarding potential parking, traffic or public safety issues or the unusual
circumstances that may trigger an exception to the exemption invoked by the County. (CEQA Guidelines
§ 1500.2.)
3. Approval of the Restripine Project at this point serves no immediate infrastructure or other
purpose
As reported by dozens of Loch Lomond residents, currently, no one parks on Point San Pedro Road, on
either side. (Aside from an occasional car for sale on the south side near Andy's Market). Thus the road
is a virtual Class II bike lane already. The only factor that will adversely affect parking and traffic is
overflow from the Marina project. If the City's conclusions on parking impacts are accurate, then Pt.
San Pedro Road will remain a de facto Class 2 bikeway on both sides even though marked as Class 3. If
the City Council is convinced that the Marina Development project approved by the City will not push
parking onto Pt. San Pedro Road or into Loch Lomond, then the City should logically retain the current
striping until after the Marina development project is occupied and a parking study is completed
because bicyclists would continue to have a marked, de facto Class II level bike lane. If the parking
study shows no overflow parking onto Pt. San Pedro, the road can be restriped as a Class II bike lane.
Two council members floated a proposal to only eliminate parking on the north side of Pt. San Pedro
Road. As much as the Loch Lomond community appreciates this overture, such a proposal would put
Loch Lomond at risk if the City's parking studies are as faulty as residents believe. This is because once
either side of Pt. San Pedro Road is made into a Class 2 bikeway, it will be extremely difficult to get the
2 The Negative Declaration for the Bicycle Master Plan - a general program level document - in no way constitutes
CEQA compliance. The DEIR for the development project cannot serve as a CEQA compliance document as it does
not contemplate the environmental impacts of a Class 11 bike lane.
City to agree to restripe again. The Mayor essentially admitted this in a recent meeting with Loch
Lomond residents.
Another factor is that there are new circumstances which will create an adverse cumulative parking
impact. Because of student growth, onsite parking at San Pedro Elementary School is already
demonstrably inadequate. Currently, parents already must park along Pt. San Pedro Road (as well as in
Loch Lomond) whenever there is a special function. The south side of Pt. San Pedro Road in front of the
school already has no parking signs, so cars can't currently park there. Removal of parking from the
north side of Pt. San Pedro Road near to the school will necessarily push cars dropping children off into
Loch Lomond. This potential cumulative impact should have been examined in a CEQA document. A
parking study could possibly remedy this oversight and lack of CECtA compliance by the City.
Conclusion
In sum, the City of San Rafael should carry out its commitments made during the 2007 planning process
for the Marina development project and not restripe the Pt. San Pedro Road until the promised parking
study is completed. Loch Lomond believes that a satisfactory settlement can be made based on Mr.
Mansourian's practical suggestion and urges the Council to adopt Mr. Mansourian's agreement in a new
resolution. This would accommodate the bicyclists' primary concern, safety, and the Loch Lomond
residents' primary concern, the potential for negative parking impacts from the Marina development.
Loch Lomond appreciates the time the City has spent on this and the consideration of Loch Lomond's
viewpoints.
Sincerely, ��^^
vr,-,S G,
Edward E. Yates
Esther Beirne
From: form_engine@fsl8.formsite.com on behalf of com
<form_engine@fsl8.formsite.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 11:05 AM
To: City Clerk
Subject: San Rafael Contact Email - 7980162
San Rafael Contact Form
City of San Rafael
Email Contact Form
Thank you for visiting the City of San Rafael web site. This form is intended for communicating with City of San Rafael staff. Your input will be
forwarded to the appropriate staff member for their attention during regular business hours.
Note that the City of San Rafael considers email to staff as informal communication. Please send a signed letter if you prefer to make your
comment/question a matter of public record. Mail formal letters to PO Box 151560, San Rafael, CA, 94915.
* First Name
Sarah
* Last Name
Gant
Address 1
President, Loch Lomond Homeowners Association
Address 2
20 Tweed Ter
City
san Rafael
State
cA
Zip Code
94901
Phone Number
* Email Address
Send To
City0erk
1
* Please enter your questions/comments below
I would like to request that the following be added to the agenda for Monday, August 18 Council meeting:
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014, two meetings took place at City Hall between representatives of the City and representatives from Loch Lomond
Homeowners Association and other neighborhoods along PSPR. Both meetings appear to have reached similar conclusions: Instead of installing
Class II restricted bike lanes along the Loch Lomond Boundary from Bayview to Manderly, the City Traffic Engineer, Nader Mansourian, has
suggested that the city install "No Parking Anytime" signs. The shoulder would remain Class 111 but would operate as a Class II bike lane in effect.
My understanding is that the group meeting with Andrew McCullough came to a similar conclusion.
The benefit to bicyclists is a safe lane free of parked cars.
The benefit to San Pedro Elementary School is that they can apply for a parking permit on occasions when they know they will have parents coming
for school events like Back To School Night in the Fall, Open House in the Spring, Graduation at the end of the year and any other events that will
require significant on -street parking. Getting a parking permit for a Class II lane is more difficult if I understood Mr. Mansourian.
The benefit to Loch Lomonders is that the No Parking Anytime signs can be more easily removed in the event that the Village at Loch Lomond
Marina requires off-site parking. If Village traffic seeks additional parking in our neighborhood streets, we can trigger a parking study, as originally
negotiated in the 2007 Resolution 12332. Parking along PSPR could then be installed, keeping unwanted Marina traffic out of our neighborhood
streets. If the current Class Il proposal were in place, it would be virtually impossible to remove it in order to add parking along the North or
Westbound side of PSPR.
I would like to request that the City Council allow this proposal to be an agenda item for the City Council Meeting on Monday 8/18, rather than
continuing to force Loch Lomond residents to line up at the microphone to state our position in Open Comments. I believe that if Nader Mansourian
presents the compromise reached between the city representatives and President Gant, Treasurer London and Attorney Ed Yates of LLHOA in
Tuesday's meeting, This item of business will proceed much more quickly and harmoniously for the council.
Thank you all for your willingness to continue working with Loch Lomond on this very important issue. I look forward to seeing you all on Monday
night.
Sincerely,
Sarah Gant, President
Loch Lomond Homeowners Association
_.i►
The petition below includes over 610 petition signers supporting the
C installation of bike lanes on both sides of Point San Pedro Road through the
AR,h oUNrf B,4Y�,f CoA ,,,cN Loch Lomond area as part of the current 2014 roadway resurfacing project.
wwvv.marinbike.org
Petition to the City of San Rafael City Council:
4 415 4'->6 34 G9
F 4-1 4 5 G `d 344 We the undersigned, urge the City of San Rafael to install bike lanes on Point
'-s.i ('l ai dSan Pedro Road. The City of San Rafael must consider the immediate safety
needs of residents and visitors who regularly bicycle on Point San Pedro
Road, including commuters, recreational riders, children, and students. The
existing roadway condition, with heavy and high speed traffic and no bicycle
facilities, presents a clear and present danger to bicyclists.
The Marin County Bicycle Coalition has been working closely with the County
of Marin and the City of San Rafael to get bike lanes installed on most of
Point San Pedro Road, an important local roadway and a very popular
segment of the San Francisco Bay Trail. However, bike lanes on one of the
most dangerous (and soon to be very congested) parts of Point San Pedro
Road are being threatened by those who believe that just needed in 2018.
We urge the City of San Rafael to include bike lanes through the Loch
Lomond area now. Doing so will fill a clear and present safety need and
protect lives now. The time is now for the City of San Rafael to take a
leadership role through direct action and to support alternative transportation
modes to better meet the needs of San Rafael residents and visitors. This
includes collaborating with ALL stakeholders and exploring creative
engineering solutions such as travel lane narrowing and/or lane reduction.
It is time for the City to stand by its General Plan policies, including:
• Design roadways to be safe and convenient for motor vehicles, transit,
bicycles and pedestrians, with highest priority placed on safety (Safe
Roadway Design, C-4).
• Identify opportunities to improve pedestrian, bicycle and transit
connections between San Rafael neighborhoods and between San
Rafael and adjacent communities (Connections Between
Neighborhoods and with Adjoining Communities, C-23).
Policies on paper mean nothing if the City does not enact them. The time has
come for the City of San Rafael to support active, healthy and affordable
transportation options for San Rafael and Marin residents and to support a
safe and attractive alternative to the automobile.
Brian
Scarth
Belvedere
Fredi
Bloom
Fairfax
Scott
Wisenbaker
Belvedere
Stephen
Ducat
Fairfax
Eduard
Still
Belvedere
David
Hoffman
Fairfax
Mark
Peterson
Benicia
Patricia
Oji
Fairfax
Kemal
Abuhan
Benicia
Donald
Johnson
Fairfax
Ernst
Schmidt
Berkeley
Katherine
Hoag
Fairfax
Michael
Kelley
Berkeley
Mark
Williams
Fairfax
Gerry
Coles
Bolinas
Rebecca
Crandall
Fairfax
Maria
Lomeli
Carmichael
Tom
Wilson
Fairfax
Michelle
Slade
Corte Madera
Adam
Ladwig
Fairfax
Steve
Markovich
Corte Madera
Erick
Betancourt
Fairfax
Janet
Lourenzo
Corte Madera
Andy
Peri
Fairfax
Jennifer
Lawson
Corte Madera
Fairfax (home) /
Mark
Norstad
Corte Madera
Jamie
Yosha
San Rafael
(work)
John
Lynch
Corte Madera
Michael
Rogers
Fairfax ca
Jenny
Walsh
Corte Madera
Wendi
Kallins
Forest Knolls
Robin
Furner
Corte Madera
Tom
Boss
Forest Knolls
Christian
Hobbs
Corte Madera
Peter
Oppenheimer
Forest Knolls
Heather
Yerman
Corte Madera
Jean
Severinghaus
Greenbrae
Chris
Churchill
Corte Madera
Diane
Merrill
Greenbrae
Joseph
Barton
Corte Madera
Sissi
Tchehrazi
Greenbrae
David
Bell
Corte Madera
David
Pyle
Greenbrae
Christine
Ritchie
Corte Madera
Conrad
Williams
Greenbrae
Olav
Larsson
Corte Madera
Ian
Prowell
Greenbrae
Jason
Hann
Corte Madera
Lee
McEachern
Greenbrae
Tricia
Wallace
Corte Madera
Cindy
Winter
Greenbrae
James
Sievert
Corte Madera
Michael
Chandler
Greenbrae
Steven
Smith
Corte Madera
Vince
O'Brien
Greenbrae
Sean
O'Day
Corte Madera
Steve
Giondomenica
Greenbrae
Janet
Furman
Corte Madera
Jo -Anne
Hampton
Greenbrae
Cheryl
Longinotti
Corte Madera
Thomas
Miller
Greenbrae
AJ
Shepard
Corte Madera
Christie
Fraser
Greenbrae
Mike
Wood
Corte Madera
Frank
Rollo
Greenbrae
Julie
Chrisman
Corte Madera
Cynthia
Countouris
Greenbrae
Stuart
Rudick
Corte Madera,
Linda
Siegel
Greenbrae
Todd
Quinn
Dublin
John
Chiarello
Half Moon Bay
Leslee
Moon
EI Portal
Amanda
Best
Incline Village
Peter
Repetti
Emeryville
Lynn
Hoerle
Inverness
Enid
Marcus
Fairfax
Martin S
Rayman, DDS
Kentfield
melissa
edeburn
Fairfax
Dmitry
Kosorukov
Kentfield
Walter
Kassoway
Fairfax
Terry
Salzer
Kentfield
Stephanie
Lapine
Fairfax
Charles
Carlson
Kentfield
Lisa
Sebastian
Fairfax
Peter
Newcome
Kentfield
Rich
Dowd
Fairfax
Tom
Arntz
Kentfield
Gwen
Froh
Fairfax
Patricia
Cunningham
Kentfield
John
Ferguson
Fairfax
Michael
Stock
Kentfield
Deborah
Duenas
Fairfax
James
Kendall
Kentfield
Christina
Toms
Fairfax
Michael
Herzog
Kentfield
Neil
Kraus
Fairfax
Alyssa
Schiffmann
Kentfield
Stephen
Hesson
Fairfax
Kevin
Murphy
Kentfield
Brian
Delfanti
fairfax
Laura
Roxon
Kentfield
Brian
Popplewell
Fairfax
Eric
Wilcox
Kentfield
Rachel
Lloyd
Fairfax
Bev
Brody
Kilauea
Cheryl
Scheurer
Fairfax
Carl
Sanders
Lagunitas
Deb
Hubsmith
Fairfax
Margaret
Conner
Larkspur
Marc
Vendetti
Fairfax
Rob
Appleton
Larkspur
William
Levine
Fairfax
Nathan
Cohen
Larkspur
Chris
Borjian
Fairfax
Sabrina
Sam
Larkspur
James
Malaspina
Fairfax
Lauren
Terk
Larkspur
Connie
Siegenthaler
Fairfax
Patrick
Wolf
Larkspur
Charlynn
Baumsteiger
Fairfax
Bryan
Smith
Larkspur
Laurie
Berliner
Fairfax
Nancy
Weninger
Larkspur
Christopher
Mcmanus
Fairfax
Maureen
Gaffney
Larkspur
Peter
Hogg
Mill Valley
Linda
Frender
Larkspur
Mike
Massaro
Mill Valley
Karl
Tede
Larkspur
Marty
Giblas
Mill Valley
Jenna
Langer
Larkspur
Paolo
Pompanin
Mill Valley
David
Moller
Larkspur
Kimberly
Hughes
Mill Valley
Mark
Langer
Larkspur
Victoria
Vogel
Mill Valley
Elizabeth
Swearingen
Larkspur
Craig
Beacock
Mill Valley
Donald
Clark
Larkspur
Richard
Sotelo
Mill Valley
Stevan
Thomas
Larkspur
Elisabeth
Thomas-Matej
Mill Valley
David
Campbell
Larkspur
Alisha
Oloughlin
Mill Valley
Matt
Bearson
Larkspur
Greg
Davis
Mountain View
Bruce
McKay
Larkspur
Christina
Del Villar
Newark
Judy
Yerman
Maetinez
Mark
Birnbaum
Novatao
Wendy
Peabody
Marina
Tom
Schmidt
Novato
Tom
Coleman
Martinez
Skot
McDaniel
Novato
Matthew
Olson
Mill Valley
Randi
Bakken
Novato
Chad
Nordwall
Mill Valley
Vaishnavi
Chandhiramouli
Novato
Penny
Noble
Mill Valley
Ryan
Gibson
Novato
Brett
Olouglin
Mill Valley
Marjorie
Forman
Novato
Anthony
Zahn
Mill Valley
Mike
Cass
Novato
Sean
Perry
Mill Valley
Michael
Luu
Novato
Steve
Connelly
Mill Valley
David
Uhlig
Novato
Kenneth
Hirsch
Mill Valley
Rich
Gasaway
Novato
Charles
Merrill
Mill Valley
Jeanie
Fidler
Novato
karrie
hovey
Mill Valley
Jeff
Gurrola
Novato
David
Sheridan
Mill Valley
John
Malone
Novato
Jim
Elias
Mill Valley
sheryl
braum
Novato
Lee
Kirkpatrick
Mill Valley
Carol
Nienaber
Novato
Terence
Bunton
Mill Valley
Robin
Sloan
Novato
Andrea
Windom
Mill Valley
Mike
Milton
Novato
Steven
Fugaro
Mill Valley
Alex
Montgomery
Novato
Peter
Bowman
Mill Valley
Brent
Beingessner
Novato
Judy
Klein
Mill valley
Thomas
Horne
Novato
Donald
Turner
Mill Valley
Georgia
Hughes
Novato
Dorothy
McQuown
Mill Valley
Mark
Sheron
Novato
Doug
Brown
Mill Valley
Gil
Dowd
Novato
Peggy
Clark
Mill Valley
Edward
Tai
Novato
Wayne
Herman
Mill Valley
Bitsa
Burger
Novato
Craig
Herzog
Mill Valley
Maura
Prendiville
Novato
Jacqueline
Jones
Mill Valley
David
Simon
Novato
Ronald
Schafer
Mill Valley
Tom
Woolley
Novato
Marilyn
Price
Mill Valley
Kristin
Drumm
Novato
Blair
Peterson
Mill Valley
Robert E
Martinez
Novato
Sara
Terrien
Mill Valley
Jane
Kern
Novato
Sherm
Yee
Mill Valley
Mark
Weir
Novato
Hilary
Hyde
Mill Valley
Larry
Castle
Novato
Hans
Fallant
Mill Valley
Hugo
Abaurre
Novato
Melanie
Mociun
Mill Valley
Michael
Dinga
Novato
Jerry
Cahill
Mill Valley
Burton
Greenspan
Novato
Barbara
Strick
Mill Valley
Sherralyn
Klein
Novato
heidi
adler
Mill Valley
Laila
Forsberg
Novato
Sam
McMillan
Mill Valley
Deirdre
Geary
Novato
Leslie
Hallanan
Mill Valley
Melissa
Nuyens
Novato
Donald
Herzog
Mill Valley
Leslie
Schaaf
Novato
Steven
Pletcher
Mill Valley
Robert
Bregoff
Oakland
Michele
Samuels
Mill Valley
Morgan
Fletcher
Oakland
Judd
Williams
Mill Valley
Veronica
Chouinard
Palo Alto
Fred
Falk
Mill Valley
Phil
Heiman
Penngrove
Robert
Freitas
Mill Valley
Robin
Clover
Petaluma
Kalara
Schuster
Mill Valley
Ted
Meister
Petaluma
Todd
English
Mill Valley
Michael
Warner
Petaluma
Christy
Allen
Mill Valley
Benjamin
Sarrazin
Petaluma
Marty
Hartrick
Mill Valley
Rob
Shattuck
Reno
William
Monsen
Richmond
Ellie
Beyers
San Francisco
Angela
Smidt
Rohnert Park
Sara
Davidson
San Francisco
Mark
Gibbon
Ross
Jose
Sanchez
San Francisco
John
Martin
Ross
Anthony
Loncich
San Francisco
Andy
Price
Ross
John
Davis
San Francisco
stuart
Chase
Sa Rafael
Karla
Jonson
San Francisco
Anne
Shuck
Sacramento
ryan
dalton
san francisco
Oreen
Delgado
San Anselmi
T.J.
Lee
San Francisco
Mario
Lamorte
San Anselmo
Suzanne
Jonson
San Francisco
Michael
Lipson
San Anselmo
John
Pacheco
San Francisco
Kevin
Carnahan
San Anselmo
Erica
Wallingford
San Francisco
Kathleen
Lanphier
San Anselmo
Lucas
Montgomery
San Francisco
Len
Goldstein
San Anselmo
Jeremy
Snell
San Francisco
Kelly
Silberberg
San Anselmo
Michael
Jankosky
San Francisco
Anne
Vosler
San Anselmo
Mike
Lee
San Francisco
Colleen
Proppe
San Anselmo
Ronald
Hirsch
San Francisco
Keith
Cronk
San Anselmo
Sarah
Llewellyn
San Francisco
Michael
King
San Anselmo
David
Soward
San Francisco
Ben
Berto
San Anselmo
Ergin
Guney
San Francisco
Peter
Hoch
San Anselmo
Miles
Epstein
San Francisco
Bruce
Clifton
San Anselmo
Boyd
Watkins
San Francisco
Kristine
Lewis
San Anselmo
Jason
Rosson
San Francisco
Lynn
Menard
San Anselmo
Robert
Schuchardt
San Francisco
Seth
Kaufman
San Anselmo
Kelly
Dubisar
San Francisco
Nelson
Branco
San Anselmo
Dan
Gillette
San Francisco
Peter
Pyle
San Anselmo
Annie
Armstrong
San Francisco
Morris
Beazley
San Anselmo
Matty
Morin
San Francisco
Dan
Freeman
San Anselmo
Bowen
Payson
San Francisco
Eric
Warner
San Anselmo
Jason
Sanchez
San Francisco
Ian
Ivarson
San Anselmo
Harold
Klingsporn
San Francisco
Calvin
Schrader
San Anselmo
Susan
George
San Francisco
Sven
Junkergard
San Anselmo
Thea
Cary
San Geronimo
Serena
Emily
Taormino
San Leandro
Anne
Gorby
San Anselmo
Peggy
Butler
San Rafael
Wolfe
Birkie
San Anselmo
Joseph
Louis
San Rafael
Scott
Samet
San Anselmo
Clay
Greene
San Rafael
Arnie
Brooke
San Anselmo
Andrew
Krone
San Rafael
Margaret
Baer
San Anselmo
Chris
Enbom
San Rafael
Alan
Prussia
San Anselmo
Mike
Samuels
San Rafael
Jacqueline
Bourcy
San Anselmo
Ryan
Chernis
San Rafael
Sarinah
Samsudin
San Anselmo
Melissa
Campos
San Rafael
Karl
Baeck
San Anselmo
Frank
Valentini
San Rafael
Ben
Wolin
San Anselmo
Leslie
Eichenberger
San Rafael
Kevin
Porter
San Anselmo
Jon
Bretan
San Rafael
Steve
Eagleton
San Anselmo
William
So
San Rafael
David
Beach
San Anselmo
Aileen
Dunn
San Rafael
Barbara
Dwyer
San Anselmo
Emily
Daniello
San Rafael
Alexis
White
San Anselmo
Richard
Weiss
San Rafael
Maureen
Durnell
San Anselmo
Soleil
Weston
San Rafael
Lou
Goodwin
San Anselmo
Colin
Weiss
San Rafael
Michael
Gaspers, Jr.
San Anselmo
Melanie
Weiss
San Rafael
Katherine
Csizmadia
San Anselmo
Bill
Kier
San Rafael
Edward
Westbrook
San Anselmo
Kelly
Bartholomew
San Rafael
Helene
Drumm
San Anselmo
Meri
Hayos
San Rafael
Peter
Hively
San Anselmo
Tom
Knott
San Rafael
Scott
Sanchez
San Anselmo
Daniel
Sonnet
San rafael
Richard
Lee
San Anselmo
Jennifer
Beales
San Rafael
Lanny
Lampl
San Anselmo
Bruce
Carmedelle
San Rafael
Raymond
Scruggs
San Anselmo
Maureen
Block
San Rafael
Stephen
Murphy
San Anslemo
Linda
Garb
San Rafael
Walt
Vernon
San Francisco
Colleen
Sonneborn
San rafael
Lydia
Sugarman
San Francisco
Jon
Sonneborn
San Rafael
Bob
Kay
San Francisco
Beth
de Carion
San Rafael
James
Drake
San Rafael
Joan
Nilsen
San Rafael
Moore
George
Froom
San Rafael
Michelle
Schoonover
San Rafael
Mitchell
Golbus
San Rafael
Steven
Schoonover
San Rafael
Carol
Thompson
San Rafael
Stephen
Brand
San Rafael
Barbara
Henricks
San Rafael
Jacquelyn
Brand
San Rafael
Kirsten
Spinelli
San Rafael
Bob
Frommer
San Rafael
James
de Carion
San Rafael
Barbara
Bylenga
San Rafael
Carol
Farrer
San Rafael
Eric
Christ
San rafael
Steve
Levinson
San Rafael
Fran
Halperin
San Rafael
Michael
Yoham
San Rafael
Richard
Schneider
San Rafael
William
Farrer
San Rafael
Steven
Juliani
San Rafael
Preston
McCoy
San Rafael
Judy
Milani
San Rafael
Alden
Hultgren
San Rafael
John
Matocq
San Rafael
David
Hafner
San Rafael
J C
Pouteau
San Rafael
Jon
Francis
San Rafael
Peter
Ekman
San Rafael
Greg
Hemsworth
San Rafael
Elizabeth
Gottlieb
San Rafael
Peter
Gebbie
San Rafael
Thomas
Metzler
San Rafael
Joanne
Giffra
San Rafael
Liliana
Lavezzo
San Rafael
Susanne
Kaufmann
San Rafael
Markus
Duffin
San Rafael
Joan
Braconi
San Rafael
Krista
Tokarz
San Rafael
Sara
Danielson
San Rafael
Ryan
Koontz
San Rafael
Kevin
San Diego
San Rafael
Steve
Taylor
San Rafael
Tim
Gilbert
San Rafael
Alex
Vollmer
San Rafael
Robert
Miller
San Rafael
Kevin
Lyons
San Rafael
Richard
Wootton
San Rafael
Jeffrey
Zanetto
San Rafael
Lisa
Lord
San Rafael
Stephen
Bingham
San Rafael
Paul
Pina
San Rafael
Mary
Collie
San Rafael
Leestma La
Kevin
Weitz
San Rafael
Johanna
Fleur
San Rafael
Neil
Sorensen
San Rafael
Henrik
Lippe
San Rafael
Tom
Johnston
San Rafael
Laurie
Vaala-Olsen
San Rafael
Jenn
Mann
San Rafael
Alex
Cichy
San Rafael
Donna
Malliett
San Rafael
Denise
Mitidieri
San Rafael
Tad
Jacobs
San Rafael
James
Dern
San Rafael
Brian
Walsh
san rafael
Mark
Ingwersen
San Rafael
Jennifer
Katz
San Rafael
William
Robinson
San Rafael
Mike
Samuels
San Rafael
John
Boeschen
San Rafael
Nicole
Persson
San Rafael
Bjorn
Sandberg
San Rafael
Brian
Cardoza
San Rafael
Colby
Teller
San Rafael
David
Ross
San Rafael
Fumio
Shibata
San Rafael
Joseph
Atzberger
San Rafael
Brian
Beaudoin
San Rafael
DON
MAXON
San Rafael
Chris
Gould
San Rafael
Abigail
Urban
San Rafael
Allison
Schutte
San Rafael
Don
Magdanz
San Rafael
Stan
Urban
San Rafael
Jonathan
Frieman
San Rafael
Brian
Hassett
San Rafael
Gary
Najarian
San Rafael
Charles
Harris
San Rafael
Virginia
Fong
San Rafael
Janet
Zanetto
San Rafael
Jocelyn
Freid
San Rafael
Matt
Switzer
San Rafael
Joy
Dahlgren
San Rafael
Tuomas
Kostiainen
San Rafael
Ravan
Moezzi
San Rafael
Thomas
Sutton
San Rafael
Brian
Bane
San Rafael
Barry
Bergman
San Rafael
Betty
Hardin
San Rafael
Barbara
Withers
San Rafael
Lee
Gotshall-Maxon
San Rafael
Wencil
Storek
San Rafael
Susan
Gotshall-Maxon
San Rafael
April
Spooner
San Rafael
Reza
Rezaian
San Rafael
Tracy
Morris
San Rafael
Barbara
Hoeschler
San Rafael
Matt
Sellers
San Rafael
Jessica
Marker
San Rafael
Dru
Parker
San Rafael
Jonathan
Marker
San Rafael
Joshua
Ebersole
San Rafael
Theresa
Eaton
San Rafael
Dana
Aftab
San Rafael
Angel
Garbarino
San Rafael
Jon
Randall
San Rafael
Stewart
Gilbert
San Rafael
Jeffrey
Sanchez
San Rafael
Gerry
Pagano
San Rafael
Amy
Probst
San Rafael
Deborah
Conrad
San Rafael
David
Morris
San Rafael
thomas
Shana
Douglas
Joshua
Sandy
Jeff
Lori
Russ
Lori
Christopher
Phill
John
Paul
Dave
Alejandro
Neil
Beckie
Jim
David
Rodger
Kees
David
Molly
Jack
Allen
David
Dennis
Jeff
Lori
Mark
Jon
Cameron
Anne -
Christine
Jennifer
Rem
Alex
Todd
Jeff
George
Bernard
Daniel
Mark
Elise
Tina
Holly
Allan
Deborah
Joyce
Cheryl
Richard
Ross
Peter
Rob
Matt
Byron
Stacey
Jeff rey
Aaron
Tony
Russ
Dan
carney
Chrisman
Lipinski
Brewer
Liaw
McCullough
Martinez -
Hassett
Erickson
Tompkins
Uren
Hoover
Greene
Daro
Swider
Moreno
Fraser
Menten
Edgar
Thalman
Jacobsen
Briggs
Spitz
O'Donoghue
West
Lavee`
Lazzarini
Crowe
Brown
Harvey
Persson
Haveman
Stewart
Strugnell
Jigarjian
O'Donnelley
Burnham
Crisafulli
Snyder
Doyne
Zylberberg
Stevens
Comin
Loftin
Cash
Mathews
Nichol
Greitzer
Raidle
Williams
Moore
MacLeod
Berridge
Roden
Slepin
Cleary
Farrell
Ivarson
Golbus
Markwick
Young
Hurlbutt
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
Michael
Craig
Terrell
Michael
Jim
Alexander
Mark
Michael
Paxton
Elizabeth
Rick
Justin
Debra
Jonathon
Nysa
Mike
Mark
Ken
Lael
Brian
Vic
James
Dwayne
Daniel
Jordan
Renee
Paul
Todd
Carolyn
Kelley
John
Marjorie
William
David
Winnifred
Wm Carey
John
Lisa
Eric
Susan
David
Kathy
Michael
Janis
Maria
Michael
Bonnie
Wayne
Kenneth
Jay
Michael
Alex
Mark
Joel
Christopher
Parrett
Heimerdinger
Anderson
Dudasko
Geraghty
Herr
Pletcher
Vellard
McCreless
Muir
Helf
Hult
Martin
Gurish
Kline
Leonard
Kaufmann
Reich
DasGupta
Lehman
Rice
Kamphoefner
Warren
McNamara
Kushner
Linde
Jolicoeur
Morton
Hodge
Buhles
Schlag
Thomas
Stephens
Spaulding
Homer -Smith
Chenoweth
Cruz
Lai
Richter
Weaver
Gaus
McLeod
Jenkins
Luft
Durana
Jacobs
Ross
Gilbert
Frank
Cohen
Dab
Thomas
Bewsher
Schmukler
Ruedy
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
(Loch Lomond)
San Rafael
San Rafael
San Rafael
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sausalito
Sebastopol
Sonoma
Soquel
Stinson Beach
Sunnyvale
Tiburon
Tiburon
Tiburon
Tiburon
Tiburon
Tiburon
Tiburon
Tiburon
Tiburon
Tiburon
Tiburon
Tiburon
Woodacre
Woodacre
Eike eKnib�t.tlwg
Rr
D
rn
s 4=oma
A� E a
MMI
�• .< c -< m O m m711 1A 1
z � z
3d 3 O n n .o
Z
` #_45
s
a*
r as � � x.�����' � •� �#4 � -� ._ � r if .: D � !�
m
MATCHLINE - SEE NEXT SHEET MATCHLINE - SEE BELOW
_�g J , 2 56pm - USER je
Sl,—\16-,�6 Stak\16.06 0-1,\1606.79 Pont Son P— Resut-mq (C,C.-ty)\6,sign\Plans\Design PIans\p—t s
MATCHLINE - SEE ABOVE
77,:0,—
V1,
«_
o,
U' z x c F
"ALol,
a D
Fri
l S'p-;�
m
a
rTl
�GZyz j a
o�Anil
pC3
h
O
mcn
r
_En
C,
zn��
m 2
m
5;m
z
1
n n m c m r
m om
r A
< O c) D
cD m
g = -r) U1 m r
W C)
m D
Lo
z D (n
Vl D_
= m"
_ C7
-- r
D
I �
m °
x
A I N g 9
n I �
I
t \tb 6lreels\16.06 —'\16 .6 Point San Pedro Resutacing (ci"c—ty)\Design\Pfaas\Design P-1\painl san P— b&e exbibitdvg
MATCHLINE - SEE ABOVE u c>
00�ory sEn -Ti
.G p
7,11
h�,
ll
tz
O0
> LOCH
OMAND LSH\A1\1A� Ra 0
o DR
t-' u.i2
LEITH Jar2 ��trs. » --- :
LANE m €�:m s
o� RBOR ori
+ W GT o. ..
M ARI A BLVLf
EAST
,'fit`s a x
fY 3 x� gg
N 0
` VISTATi
n
�A ROYAL
y& 3$ CT �0 i` x
Z Z u v
0 0 ; AORTO
O �� BELLOW t
n O
S DI
4 m .3 cn
�
t #. �
y a W
,t
m 9 r to
M:
x m-i a
zq
m m'
ATTACHMENT 1
P1111\P-t - pl- Eke-6it.d.q
MATCHLINE - SEE ABOVE
4,g
s6, -
q-
-3
Cal
cz e 4-
tz
t-
tt
>1)
�u
z U)
9 aid
> -T,
m
m
V)
00.
pA
M
M-4
1A
m ,
zf
4p
Ir;Tul
0K,
LD
cp
A ;W5
M
m 14,
zm
5>m
cl)
32
z 0
z
W -u
m P
m
z c). . . . . . . . . .
o co C
z
F-1
C) C-) >
Tj (1) r -
m
o T
> m >
U)
m
IR
N
U)
M
> x
ti
c
ATTACHMENT 1
Point San Pedro Bike Lanes:
MCBC Recommended Motion
8-18-14
Adopt a resolution to install a Class II bike lane along Point San Pedro Road as
per Exhibit C in the westbound direction. Modify Exhibit C to include a modified
Class II (Class III with no parking) along the frontage of Loch Lomond Marina in
the eastbound direction from the westbound most part of the Marina to Bayview
Drive.
August 18, 2014
The Honorable Gary Phillips, Mayor of `atm Rafael
Ai-ld \ 1c.iibcr,' of the San Rafael City Cotrcil
San Rafael COi Hall
1400 Fifth Street
San Rafael, California 94901.
Subject: Bic%'cle Lanes on Point San Pedro Road
Dear Mayor Phillips and Members of the City Council:
P ' Zo�� 1
I am writing to o, -o on behalf of tb,,, P tit S a ii I �Jno I Coalition, Bouri of
The Coalition 113c-al*'a: -)oft the Cl;,,,, (Stiff Report Option -7-33) ;flat
the bicycle laiie on th11orth sidc opoint San Pedr() RoL'-,", between Manderly Read and
Bayview Drive renicain as a designated Class Its 11-icycle lane ai-J. that the Ci'P. post no
parking signs along tli'at portion of the roadway. tai i days in which the San Pedro
S ,a d; - Elementary School is having a function that reqLiires additional P-irlillv- over and above
their existing parking supply, the school would --'Nie to obtain ji.ahorization from the
City. at n�� cost. 1 o use a portion of the bike lane on Point San Pedro Road across from the
schooi for event parking.
This proposed solution was developed as a result of discussions with representatives of the
Point Safi Pedro Road Coalition, The M�irin County Bicycle Coalition, the City of San
,
Rafael Bic,, cle and 1-1cdestrian Advisory G mmittee and City staff and has the support of
the Loch Lomond Hot neov,piers
sociation.
The Pt. San Pedro R�,ad C, -J, 1 ItTor Board also supports the C'�' ndation that
,
the bicycle lane on the south site of Point San Pedro Road from theof San Pedro
Elementary School to Beach Drive be maintained as Class III bicycle lane at this time.
The designation of bicycle lanes in these two areas i ould be rea�,;-,sped after the Loch
Lomond Marina Development is completed and op =r and a survey taken to
determine whether on street parking on Point San P, T -,O Road is n -',ded for overflow
parking.
Our Board t!, se recommendations offer a rational and fair way to address the
cd. w,
would encourage you to s-rort and approve them.
once 1 C "�,l D� nr
,
Ke in M. Hagerty
Chairperson, Rlv�, N rk�onitntttee
4 Q,